© Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern © Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2016 Committee: Charles Williams Caroline Hartse Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences University of Washington Abstract A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Charles Williams School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Evelyn Nakano Glenn’s application of T. H. Marshall’s tripartite citizenship (2002) informs intersectional understandings of racialized and gendered labor in the historic development of the United States’ imperial colonialism and military industry. Recent place attachment studies challenge assumptions of belonging, home and civic responsibility aligned with social class, while current gentrification and revitalization scholarship reveals neoliberal sustainability practices that maintain unspoken class bias. Social citizenship, gendered labor and vice economy experiences for residents in domestic post-industrial gentrified cities that demonstrate parallels with global US military colonies are not readily documented. This mixed-methods study addresses social construction of home and belonging for residents of a vice labor and military veteran class in Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington, a western US military manufacturing and base city. This thesis seeks to explain how and why some workers and residents in the city of Bremerton, Washington have been historically marginalized, even as their roles, framed as patriotic contributions, have been integral to the socioeconomic efforts and successes of the dominant militarized culture. I explore how study participants make meaning of their experiences – some in gendered and sexualized vice labor in service to military and federal personnel, and some who negotiate social changes after their withdrawal from service in the military – within this community that privileges its military presence and facilities. Demographic data demonstrate the economic and social effects of the city’s federal alliance, illustrating that many residents in the city’s rejuvenation area are not benefitting from an association with the socially enforced militaristic hegemony, either as service workers or as veterans of military service, despite their contributions to the city’s patriotic military alliance. I demonstrate, in conflict with the dominant narrative, the important role a sense of community and belonging play in the lives of participants of this study, indicated by how they view their social and labor contributions to the community, how they negotiate the social hierarchy of the community, and how they envision a future Bremerton that affords them fully applied legal, civil, and social citizenship. This study contributes to multidisciplinary discourses on urban studies, environmental psychology, internal colonialism, and class and gender theory. Keywords: Bremerton, citizenship, gendered labor, home, internal colonialism, place attachment, post-colonial critique, military industry, sexualized labor, vice work vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..…...…...xv Thesis Research Questions……………………………………………………….……..………xx Organization of Thesis…………………………………………………………………..………xx Chapter 1: Research Methodology and Methods……………………………………….……..….……24 Methodological Approach to Research…………………………………………………..….....25 Theoretical Perspective and Interpretive Paradigm Mixed-method Approach of Study…………………………………………………..…………28 Qualitative Research Feminist communitarianism. Convivial research. Interview narratives methods and approach. Quantitative Research Quantitative data. Interdisciplinary Research of Secondary Sources……………………………………….……40 Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Methods of Inquiry Application of multidisciplinary methods. Analytical Framework of Thesis…………………………………………………………..……42 Tripartite Model of Analysis Multidisciplinary Approach to Analytical Framework Chapter 2: Colonialism and Militaristic Hegemony…………………………………...........................46 Colonialism…………………………………………………………………………………..…..46 Definitions Domestic Colonialism Bremerton: Building the colony. 20th Century colonial labor. Politics of Space in the Militarized City Navy Yard City. Charleston. Evergreen Park. Downtown. Militaristic Hegemony……………………………………………………………….…….……62 Local Examples of Militaristic Hegemony vii Chapter 3: Military Culture, Gender Creation, and Sexualized Labor………………….…...……...72 Military and Gender……………………………………………………………..……..……….74 Culture of Violence Local examples. Military and Vice Economics…………………………………………………..……….………84 Exchange of Goods and Services Economic Model Conflation of the labor and the laborer. Commodification of emotions, ownership of bodies. Local Vice In-group Culture…………………………………………………..………………..95 Agency and Autonomy in Vice Labor Cultivating clients. Social In-group Culture Changes in Government Policies and Vice Economy………………………….….…..……..100 Leaving Vice Work Chapter 4: Ownership of Place………………………….…………………………...……............…...108 Organization of Chapter………………………………………………………………………110 Social Citizenship………………………………………………………………………………112 Place Attachment Police and Community Bremerton’s Military Industry and Allocation of Space…………………………………….121 Bremerton City Renewal Projects Gentrification. City planning and priorities of public space. Place Making and Belonging…………………………………………………………………..131 Downtown Residential Housing Bremerton housing history. Residents’ Economic Data from the Downtown Districts Analysis. Veteran residents. Public Housing and Market Rate Rentals………………………………………………...….145 Westpark to BayVista Hiding poverty. viii Conclusion: Goals, Findings, and Recommendations…………………………......……..……..…….154 Goals of the Thesis……………………………………………………………………………..154 Themes in the Qualitative Findings…………………………………………………………...154 Community Recommendations………………………………………………………………..155 Economic Alternatives Diversified manufacturing. Charleston Historic District theme. Rental Habitability Issues Home Ownership Incentives As residents. As landlords. Possible Future Study………………………………………………………………………….158 Broader Implications…………………………………………………………………………..158 Other Applications of the Tripartite Model References……………………………………………………………………………………….....…....162 Appendices……………………………………………………………………………………..……......177 Appendix A: List of Images…………………………………………………………………..…177 Appendix B: List of Tables…………………………………………………………………...…179 Appendix C: Definitions……………………………………………………………………...…184 Appendix D: Additional Readings................................................................................................187 Appendix E: Human Research Procedural Documentation…………………………………..…192 Appendix F: Thesis Committee Approval………………………………………………………197 ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Early on in this work, I was advised to research something about which I care deeply, even if others may not find it important. This turned out to be advice I revisited several times during three years of research and writing. Originally motivated by rental housing conditions in my city’s downtown neighborhood, my research expanded into issues of class and gender, labor, and the use of powerful imagery in the social construction of militarized hegemony of America’s self-image as harbinger of freedom, individualism, and democracy as they related to the internal political economy of the Western US militarized city that I called home. This thesis is the culmination of this undertaking, and its direction and discoveries are the result of an interdisciplinary approach supported by the Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies program offered at the University of Washington’s Tacoma campus. If there is one thread continuously woven throughout the curriculum of the University’s School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, it is that there is no “self-made” success; communalism and reciprocity persistently animate the machinery of our culture, in defiance of that machine’s proclamations of operational individualism. So in that spirit, I want to express my sincere thanks to the following people for their contributions to my completion of this work. To the many scholars who came before me, whose labors and ideas provided an academic basis and theoretical framework for this thesis, enabling me to put names on the forces I see at work in the city of Bremerton, I give my recognition. To the participants in this study, and the informants who offered anecdotes and insight, I am indebted to you. You entrusted me with your stories. When you dared to tell your truths, you helped to validate my interpretations of my own experiences. With this thesis, I hope that I have honored you in return. I appreciate the assistance from the Federal Student Aid program. It kept the wolves at bay, and I never could have afforded this privileged experience without it. To the many educators who helped me along the way, I offer my deep gratitude. In particular, I thank Dr. Susan Digby, for sharing her humor, kindness, and wisdom, and for taking a personal interest in my artwork and ideas; my project on Bremerton in her Human Geography course was the impetus for this thesis. I am thankful to Professor Phil Schaeffer: for sharing his juicy historical anecdotes,
Recommended publications
  • Wac Seasons and Limits
    Chapter 232-28 Chapter 232-28 WAC SEASONS AND LIMITS WAC 232-28-02201 Game management units (GMUs)—Special game areas 232-28-248 Special closures and firearm restriction areas. —Boundary descriptions—Region one. [Statutory 232-28-259 Electronic treeing switches. Authority: RCW 77.12.040, 77.12.010, 77.12.020, 232-28-266 Damage prevention permit hunts. 77.12.770, 77.12.780. WSR 00-04-017 (Order 00-05), § 232-28-273 2012-2014 Moose seasons, permit quotas, and areas. 232-28-02201, filed 1/24/00, effective 2/24/00. Statu- 232-28-283 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special tory Authority: RCW 77.12.040. WSR 99-10-102 incentive permits. (Order 99-40), § 232-28-02201, filed 5/5/99, effective 232-28-286 2013, 2014, and 2015 Spring black bear seasons and 6/5/99; WSR 98-10-015 (Order 98-64), § 232-28- regulations. 02201, filed 4/22/98, effective 5/23/98; WSR 97-06-050 232-28-288 2012-2014 Fall black bear hunting seasons and regula- (Order 97-34), § 232-28-02201, filed 2/27/97, effective tions. 3/30/97; WSR 94-11-031 (Order 639), § 232-28-02201, filed 5/10/94, effective 6/10/94.] Repealed by WSR 03- 232-28-290 Washington raffle hunts. 06-110 (Order 03-23), filed 3/5/03, effective 4/5/03. 232-28-291 Special hunting season permits. Statutory Authority: RCW 77.12.047. 232-28-292 Washington auction hunts. 232-28-02202 Game management units (GMUs)—Special game areas 232-28-293 Landowner raffle hunts.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County GWM Plan, Background Data Collection and Management Issues Volume I
    I I KITSAP COUNTY I GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN I I GRANT NO. 1 BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES I VOLUME I I I I I I I April 1991 I Prepared By I Kitsap County Ground Water Advisory Committee Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. Hart-Crowser, Inc. Pacific Groundwater Group I Robinson & Noble, Inc. I A Project Funded In Part Through The I Centennial Clean Water Fund IUIIIiTII ITIU I I P I I T • I I T I f PROPERTY OF STATE OF WASHINGTON I III ECOLOGY . DEPAimiENT OF ECOLOGY UBRARY I I ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. El~ ?0 5o-: 9;'6 • .J26 So.u~""o:a St ·-,w • Sc..\e .z-:... I 0:1"'t:-'a ::as~'rg'o~ 9E507 2C6l 352-'5090 • ;;:._'!. :2C6l ?57-6:::13 I April 28, 1991 I Fe" 41660.0 Ms. Clair Burwell I 5028 N.W. ElDorado Blvd. Bremerton, WA 98312 Subject: Kitsap County Ground Water Management Plan I Grant No.1- Volume I & Volume II Report I Dear Ms. Burwell: Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., in association with Hart-Crowser, Inc., Pacific Groundwater Group, and Robinson & Noble, Inc., is pleased to submit documentation for I the Kitsap County Ground Water Management Plan (GWMP), Grant No. 1 activities. Grant No. 1 activities focused upon the collection and analysis of data used to characterize I the groundwater of Kitsap County. Where data was insufficient to accurately characterize conditions of particular interest, a specific program was recommended to collect and analyze additional information during Grant No. 2 activities and in later years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons MAIS Projects and Theses School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Spring 6-10-2016 A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern University of Washington Tacoma, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters Part of the Community-Based Research Commons, Human Geography Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Fern, Anna K., "A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony" (2016). MAIS Projects and Theses. 48. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters/48 This Open Access (no embargo, no restriction) is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAIS Projects and Theses by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. © Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2016 Committee: Charles Williams Caroline Hartse Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences University of Washington Abstract A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Service Area and Infrastructure Detail
    KITSAP COUNTY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4.0 SERVICE AREA AND INFRASTRUCTURE DETAIL 4.1 Administration: Public Buildings Overview Kitsap County’s public buildings, which include government administrative offices, courtrooms, juvenile justice, maintenance facilities, and community centers, serve the county as a whole, including incorporated and unincorporated populations. Kitsap County Administration Building Kitsap County Coroner’s Office www.wbdg.org Inventory of Current Facilities Exhibit 4-1 shows the location and size of each public building. The 2015 inventory shows that the County has approximately 193,350 square feet of administrative courthouse campus space, 106,417 square feet of administration space, 69,560 square feet of buildings serviced by parks space, 89,456 square feet of maintenance facilities, and 50,850 square feet of community centers space. In total, Kitsap County has approximately 509,633 square feet of public building space. Final 4-33 June 2016 KITSAP COUNTY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Exhibit 4-1. County Public Buildings: Current Facilities Inventory (2015) Facility Location Size (Sq Ft) Administrative Courthouse Campus Courthouse (includes 4 district 614 Division Street, Port Orchard 105,000 and 7 superior) courtrooms) Bullard Building 8,000 New Administration Building 619 Division Street, Port Orchard 80,350 Total Administrative Courthouse Campus 193,350 Corrections Facility Juvenile Jail Facility 35 beds Total Corrections Facility 35 beds Other Administrative Facilities 730 Prospect, Port Orchard (Leased Child Support*
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Clean Water Fund Grant
    CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER FUND GRANT State of Washington Department of Ecology & Port of Illahee Illahee Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Grant G0700283 FINAL REPORT June 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER GRANT 4 3. BASIN ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 (THE PARAMETRIX REPORT) 3.1 Project Overview 3.2 Primary Watershed Issues 3.3 Recommended Strategies 3.4 Funding and Partnerships Required 3.5 Implementation of SWMP Findings 3.6 Demonstration Rain Garden 3.7 Gifting of Rolling Hills Golf Course 4. WATER QUALITY MONITORING 7 4.1 Summary Findings 4.2 Background 4.3 Objective 4.4 Previous and Ongoing Efforts 4.5 Monitoring Stations 4.6 Criteria for Analyzing the Results 4.7 Monitoring Results 4.8 Analysis Conclusions 4.9 Recommendations 5. RIPARIAN PLANTING 12 5.1 Delayed Installation Due to Flooding 5.2 Culvert Dredging Results 5.3 Landowners Agreement 5.4 Riparian Planting 6. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION 13 6.1 Reaching Residents 6.2 New Methods Electronic Communication (Website/Email/Blogs/Facebook) 6.3 Website 2 6.4 Website Advertised 6.5 Frequency of Website Use 6.6 Direct Electronic Communication 6.7 Email Numbers 6.8 Email Newsletter Approach 6.9 Updates Posted on Blog 6.10 Updates on Facebook 6.11 Website Transition 6.12 Port of Illahee Website 6.13 Website Collaboration 6.14 Archival History 6.15 Labor Intensive 6.16 Websites Volunteer Supported Educational Signs (Rain Garden/Preserve/SWMP) 6.17 Educational Sign Concept 6.18 Sign Locations 6.19 Rain Garden Opportunity 6.20 Rain Garden Agreements & Plots 6.21 Rain Garden Educational Signs 6.22 Preserve/SWMP Educational Signs Illahee Film Project 6.23 Strategy 6.24 Illahee Film Traditional Meetings 6.25 Four Public Meetings Held 6.26 Parametrix Mid-Project Briefing 3/11/08 6.27 Combined Meeting & Parametrix Briefing 1/29/09 6.28 Keta Waters Presentation 6/30/09 6.29 Second Keta Waters Presentation 3/29/11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Facility Plan
    KITSAP COUNTY UGA SIZING & COMPOSITION REMAND Final Capital Facilities Plan Update AUGUST 2012 KITSAP COUNTY FINAL CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE 2013-2025 Kitsap County UGA Sizing and Composition Remand August 2012 Prepared For: Kitsap County Special Projects Division 614 Division St. MS-4 Port Orchard, WA 98366 Contact: Angie Silva Special Projects Planner/Policy Analyst Phone: (360) 337-4841 Email: [email protected] Principal Authors: BERK 2025 First Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 324-8760 Project Management, Finance, Public Services Parametrix 4660 Kitsap Way, Suite A Bremerton, WA 98312 (360) 377-0014 Transportation and Infrastructure Contributors: BHC Consultants Kitsap County Community Development Department Kitsap County Department of Administrative Services Kitsap County Information Services Department Kitsap County Parks and Recreation Department Kitsap County Public Works Department Kitsap County Sheriff Kitsap County Special Projects Division In consultation with Kitsap County Special Districts and Municipal Service Providers FINAL CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE Kitsap County Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Contents of the Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Growth Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Resources Protection Program
    W.W.I.R.P.P. SERIES-NO. 5 INSTREAM RESOURCES PROTECTION PROGRAM KITSAP WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 15 Including PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE RULES STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY JUNE 1981 INSTREAM RESOURCES PROTECTION PROGRAM KITSAP WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 15 including PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Prepared by Water Resources Policy Development Section Washington State Department of Ecology Project Planner, Jeanne Holloman (206) 753-6189 Washington State Department of Printing Olympia, Washington June 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 4 PROGRAM AREA DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 12 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 14 Streams and Lakes.......................................................................................................... 14 Ground Waters ............................................................................................................... 22 WATER USE..................................................................................................................... ........ 24 INSTREAM USES...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment October 1997
    Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment October 1997 Open File Technical Report No. 97-04 Prepared by: Kitsap Public Utility District in association with: Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., Pacific Groundwater Group, Inc. Robinson & Noble, Inc., KCM, Inc. Prepared in cooperation with Washington State Department of Ecology NW Regional Office Water Resource Program 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 P:\basindoc\version3\toc October 3, 1997 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Initial Watershed Assessments..........................................................................1-1 1.2 Kitsap County Portion of Water Resource Inventory Area 15..........................1-1 1.3 Information Sources..........................................................................................1-2 2. Basin Description 2.1 Area Description...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Subareas ............................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Land Cover and Land Use.................................................................................2-2 2.4 Climate ..............................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Water Balance ...................................................................................................2-4 2.6 Population .........................................................................................................2-4 3. Precipitation
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report
    Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report Monitoring Year 2016 - 2017 03/11/2019 RESOURCES L NATURA DNR monitors abundance and depth distribution of native seagrasses to determine status and trends in greater Puget Sound through the Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Program (SVMP) (https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-eelgrass- monitoring). The Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Program is a component of the Puget Sound Ecosystem Monitoring Program (PSEMP) (https://sites.google.com/a/psemp.org/psemp/home). Cover Photo: Eelgrass at Dumas Bay, Federal Way. Photo credit: Lisa Ferrier. Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report Monitoring Year 2016 - 2017 03/11/2019 Bart Christiaen Lisa Ferrier Pete Dowty Jeff Gaeckle Helen Berry Nearshore Habitat Program Aquatic Resources Division Acknowledgements The Nearshore Habitat Program is part of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Aquatic Resources Division, the steward for State Owned Aquatic Lands. Program funding is provided through the Aquatics Resource Management Cost Account (RMCA). The Nearshore Habitat Program monitors and evaluates the status and trends of marine vegetation for DNR and the Puget Sound Partnership. The Nearshore Habitat Program is grateful to several governmental entities that have provided funding for DNR to expand seagrass monitoring in their areas of interest. Entities that have funded specific studies include: the Suquamish Tribe, the City of Bainbridge Island, the City of Bellingham, King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks – Wastewater Treatment Division, the DNR Aquatic Reserves Program, and Washington State Parks. The following document fulfills DNR’s Eelgrass Monitoring Performance measure. It also fulfills tasks in the Puget Sound Partnership’s Action Agenda by providing information on the status and trends of one of the selected indicators of environmental health in Puget Sound.
    [Show full text]