Centennial Clean Water Fund Grant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Centennial Clean Water Fund Grant CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER FUND GRANT State of Washington Department of Ecology & Port of Illahee Illahee Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Grant G0700283 FINAL REPORT June 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER GRANT 4 3. BASIN ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4 (THE PARAMETRIX REPORT) 3.1 Project Overview 3.2 Primary Watershed Issues 3.3 Recommended Strategies 3.4 Funding and Partnerships Required 3.5 Implementation of SWMP Findings 3.6 Demonstration Rain Garden 3.7 Gifting of Rolling Hills Golf Course 4. WATER QUALITY MONITORING 7 4.1 Summary Findings 4.2 Background 4.3 Objective 4.4 Previous and Ongoing Efforts 4.5 Monitoring Stations 4.6 Criteria for Analyzing the Results 4.7 Monitoring Results 4.8 Analysis Conclusions 4.9 Recommendations 5. RIPARIAN PLANTING 12 5.1 Delayed Installation Due to Flooding 5.2 Culvert Dredging Results 5.3 Landowners Agreement 5.4 Riparian Planting 6. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION 13 6.1 Reaching Residents 6.2 New Methods Electronic Communication (Website/Email/Blogs/Facebook) 6.3 Website 2 6.4 Website Advertised 6.5 Frequency of Website Use 6.6 Direct Electronic Communication 6.7 Email Numbers 6.8 Email Newsletter Approach 6.9 Updates Posted on Blog 6.10 Updates on Facebook 6.11 Website Transition 6.12 Port of Illahee Website 6.13 Website Collaboration 6.14 Archival History 6.15 Labor Intensive 6.16 Websites Volunteer Supported Educational Signs (Rain Garden/Preserve/SWMP) 6.17 Educational Sign Concept 6.18 Sign Locations 6.19 Rain Garden Opportunity 6.20 Rain Garden Agreements & Plots 6.21 Rain Garden Educational Signs 6.22 Preserve/SWMP Educational Signs Illahee Film Project 6.23 Strategy 6.24 Illahee Film Traditional Meetings 6.25 Four Public Meetings Held 6.26 Parametrix Mid-Project Briefing 3/11/08 6.27 Combined Meeting & Parametrix Briefing 1/29/09 6.28 Keta Waters Presentation 6/30/09 6.29 Second Keta Waters Presentation 3/29/11 7. ECOLOGY SITE VISIT 19 8. CONCLUSIONS 21 8.1 Just the Beginning 8.2 Storm Water Surges Continue 8.3 Aquifer Problems Continue 8.4 Golf Course Acquisition - A Giant Step Forward 8.5 Public Information & Education Efforts 8.6 Illahee Film – A Grant Project Summary Report 3 1. INTRODUCTION Illahee is a community with many amenities including a small fish bearing stream, a nearly self contained watershed, critical areas, aquifer recharge areas, riparian areas, and flood plains, such that nearly half of Illahee is still in its natural state. It is also a community with major water related issues affecting local aquifers, Illahee Creek, and Puget Sound waters and shorelines. The Illahee Creek watershed is relatively small when compared to other watersheds in the Puget Sound region, but it is a major contributor of sediment pollution in Port Orchard Bay. Although much of the watershed is protected by the natural features of the Illahee Preserve, it has been impacted by increasing urban development in the upland margins of the watershed. These developments were believed to be influencing peak storm flows and exacerbating low flow problems in Illahee Creek. Additionally, Illahee Creek is on Ecology’s 303(d) list (impaired water bodies list) for excess fecal coliform bacteria and low dissolved oxygen. Those issues are the reason the Port of Illahee was awarded a Centennial Clean Water grant by the Washington State Department of Ecology. 2. CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER GRANT The Centennial Clean Water grant seeks to improve the waters of Illahee Creek and Port Orchard Bay by supporting four specific tasks: Basin Assessment and Surface Water Management Planning, Water Quality Monitoring, Riparian Planting, and Public Information and Education. Total Cost of Project: $268,000.00 Grant Amount: $181,000.00 Project Start Date: 4/17/2007 Project End Date: 6/30/2011 3. BASIN ASSESSMENT AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.1 Project Overview. The engineering firm Parametrix was contracted to complete an Illahee Basin Assessment and Surface Water Management Plan. The assessment was conducted by project manager and water resources specialist Erin Nelson, PE, LG; watershed assessment lead and recognized watershed expert Derek Booth, PhD, PE, PG; aquifer protection lead and recognized hydrologist Joel Massmann, PhD, PE; and fisheries/habitat lead and fisheries biologist Pete Lawson. The Illahee Creek Watershed Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) was issued in September 2008. Portions of the executive summary are as follows: 4 An aerial view of the Illahee Watershed shows a substantial forested area surrounding the mainstem of Illahee creek and its tributaries. To view it from this perspective, one might conclude that the creek is sufficiently protected from urban growth or stormwater impacts. This is not the case. Despite the excellent riparian conditions afforded by the Illahee Preserve, Illahee Creek and its tributaries are being impacted by stormwater runoff, and reduced aquifer recharge from development outside the forested area. Without implementation of stormwater controls on existing development and greater regulatory or institutional controls on future development, including insurance of adequate aquifer protection, the aquatic habitat conditions in Illahee Creek will continue to degrade. We do believe recovery is possible; however, it will take a combination of strategies and partnerships between public and private stakeholders for funding and implementation. Illahee Creek Watershed Surface Water Management Plan Report 3.2 Primary Watershed Issues. The report summarizes the primary issues impacting the watershed as: Surface Water Runoff Surface water runoff from impervious surfaces and conversion of watershed forested properties has altered the natural hydrology of Illahee Creek resulting in channel erosion and sedimentation that has degraded aquatic habitat conditions in the creek. Landslides Inappropriate stormwater discharge locations on steep erosive slopes have caused landslides that deliver high volumes of sediment to the creek and subsequently the Illahee Creek delta. Reduced Aquifer Recharge Groundwater seeps are the primary source of water to Illahee Creek. With groundwater resources in the Illahee Creek watershed being over-allocated, the withdrawal of groundwater for domestic purposes and the conversion of more land to impervious surfaces will reduce the baseflows available to Illahee Creek, impacting salmonids that need fresh, cold water for survival. 5 Water Quality Illahee Creek is on Ecology’s 303(d) Category 5 list for impairment due to elevated fecal coliform bacteria and low dissolved oxygen. Functionality of Illahee Creek Culvert The Illahee Creek culvert is being impacted by high sediment loads originating higher up in the watershed. The culvert could be jeopardized by continued sediment deposition and high peak flows, as well as an ongoing maintenance problem for Kitsap County staff. Degraded Salmonid Habitat All of the above issues result in degraded habitat for aquatic species, including salmonids that have historically used Illahee Creek for spawning and rearing. 3.3 Recommended Strategies. Strategies recommended in the assessment are as follows: The Illahee Community in partnership with Kitsap County and others have largely accomplished one of the most important aspects of surface water management: protection of high quality resources and land in the watershed. Acquisition of the 460-acres that is now the Illahee Preserve make it possible to address other issues in the watershed and perhaps, reverse the trend of aquatic habitat degradation in Illahee Creek. The recommended strategies for addressing the issues affecting Illahee Creek include planning, educational and capital strategies that will involve multiple stakeholders, regulations, and agencies with different interests. The strategies include projects that (1) preserve ecological function, (2) retrofit existing development, and (3) plan for and strive to reduce impacts from future development. Additionally, monitoring programs are recommended to track progress as these strategies are implemented. The lists for the recommended strategies discussed in this plan as well as priority and timeframe for implementation are noted in the report in Table ES-1 of the Executive Summary, in the report body, and in Appendix C. 3.4 Funding and Partnerships Required. The report goes on to recommend that implementation of the recommendations will require significant funding and partnerships. Implementation of the strategies identified in this plan will require significant funding and partnerships. Many communities struggle to get basic funding needs met, let alone funding for beneficial projects that are not required for basic health-and-safety needs. This will be the primary challenge for the Port of Illahee and the Illahee Community in implementing this plan. Possible funding sources for projects identified in the plan include (1) Kitsap County for projects directly related to County needs or requirements, (2) granting agencies, (3) taxes or fees collected by a special drainage district or the Port district, (4) individual private donors, and (5) volunteer labor. For many projects, the best approach will be to develop strategic partnerships and cost-sharing arrangements between stakeholders. 6 The total estimated cost to bring existing development into compliance with current stormwater standards that are considered protective of the environment is approximately $20 million. The best strategy to protect Illahee Creek from future degradation is to ensure that
Recommended publications
  • Wac Seasons and Limits
    Chapter 232-28 Chapter 232-28 WAC SEASONS AND LIMITS WAC 232-28-02201 Game management units (GMUs)—Special game areas 232-28-248 Special closures and firearm restriction areas. —Boundary descriptions—Region one. [Statutory 232-28-259 Electronic treeing switches. Authority: RCW 77.12.040, 77.12.010, 77.12.020, 232-28-266 Damage prevention permit hunts. 77.12.770, 77.12.780. WSR 00-04-017 (Order 00-05), § 232-28-273 2012-2014 Moose seasons, permit quotas, and areas. 232-28-02201, filed 1/24/00, effective 2/24/00. Statu- 232-28-283 Big game and wild turkey auction, raffle, and special tory Authority: RCW 77.12.040. WSR 99-10-102 incentive permits. (Order 99-40), § 232-28-02201, filed 5/5/99, effective 232-28-286 2013, 2014, and 2015 Spring black bear seasons and 6/5/99; WSR 98-10-015 (Order 98-64), § 232-28- regulations. 02201, filed 4/22/98, effective 5/23/98; WSR 97-06-050 232-28-288 2012-2014 Fall black bear hunting seasons and regula- (Order 97-34), § 232-28-02201, filed 2/27/97, effective tions. 3/30/97; WSR 94-11-031 (Order 639), § 232-28-02201, filed 5/10/94, effective 6/10/94.] Repealed by WSR 03- 232-28-290 Washington raffle hunts. 06-110 (Order 03-23), filed 3/5/03, effective 4/5/03. 232-28-291 Special hunting season permits. Statutory Authority: RCW 77.12.047. 232-28-292 Washington auction hunts. 232-28-02202 Game management units (GMUs)—Special game areas 232-28-293 Landowner raffle hunts.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County GWM Plan, Background Data Collection and Management Issues Volume I
    I I KITSAP COUNTY I GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN I I GRANT NO. 1 BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES I VOLUME I I I I I I I April 1991 I Prepared By I Kitsap County Ground Water Advisory Committee Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. Hart-Crowser, Inc. Pacific Groundwater Group I Robinson & Noble, Inc. I A Project Funded In Part Through The I Centennial Clean Water Fund IUIIIiTII ITIU I I P I I T • I I T I f PROPERTY OF STATE OF WASHINGTON I III ECOLOGY . DEPAimiENT OF ECOLOGY UBRARY I I ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. El~ ?0 5o-: 9;'6 • .J26 So.u~""o:a St ·-,w • Sc..\e .z-:... I 0:1"'t:-'a ::as~'rg'o~ 9E507 2C6l 352-'5090 • ;;:._'!. :2C6l ?57-6:::13 I April 28, 1991 I Fe" 41660.0 Ms. Clair Burwell I 5028 N.W. ElDorado Blvd. Bremerton, WA 98312 Subject: Kitsap County Ground Water Management Plan I Grant No.1- Volume I & Volume II Report I Dear Ms. Burwell: Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., in association with Hart-Crowser, Inc., Pacific Groundwater Group, and Robinson & Noble, Inc., is pleased to submit documentation for I the Kitsap County Ground Water Management Plan (GWMP), Grant No. 1 activities. Grant No. 1 activities focused upon the collection and analysis of data used to characterize I the groundwater of Kitsap County. Where data was insufficient to accurately characterize conditions of particular interest, a specific program was recommended to collect and analyze additional information during Grant No. 2 activities and in later years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons MAIS Projects and Theses School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Spring 6-10-2016 A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern University of Washington Tacoma, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters Part of the Community-Based Research Commons, Human Geography Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Fern, Anna K., "A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony" (2016). MAIS Projects and Theses. 48. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters/48 This Open Access (no embargo, no restriction) is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAIS Projects and Theses by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. © Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2016 Committee: Charles Williams Caroline Hartse Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences University of Washington Abstract A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Service Area and Infrastructure Detail
    KITSAP COUNTY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4.0 SERVICE AREA AND INFRASTRUCTURE DETAIL 4.1 Administration: Public Buildings Overview Kitsap County’s public buildings, which include government administrative offices, courtrooms, juvenile justice, maintenance facilities, and community centers, serve the county as a whole, including incorporated and unincorporated populations. Kitsap County Administration Building Kitsap County Coroner’s Office www.wbdg.org Inventory of Current Facilities Exhibit 4-1 shows the location and size of each public building. The 2015 inventory shows that the County has approximately 193,350 square feet of administrative courthouse campus space, 106,417 square feet of administration space, 69,560 square feet of buildings serviced by parks space, 89,456 square feet of maintenance facilities, and 50,850 square feet of community centers space. In total, Kitsap County has approximately 509,633 square feet of public building space. Final 4-33 June 2016 KITSAP COUNTY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Exhibit 4-1. County Public Buildings: Current Facilities Inventory (2015) Facility Location Size (Sq Ft) Administrative Courthouse Campus Courthouse (includes 4 district 614 Division Street, Port Orchard 105,000 and 7 superior) courtrooms) Bullard Building 8,000 New Administration Building 619 Division Street, Port Orchard 80,350 Total Administrative Courthouse Campus 193,350 Corrections Facility Juvenile Jail Facility 35 beds Total Corrections Facility 35 beds Other Administrative Facilities 730 Prospect, Port Orchard (Leased Child Support*
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Facility Plan
    KITSAP COUNTY UGA SIZING & COMPOSITION REMAND Final Capital Facilities Plan Update AUGUST 2012 KITSAP COUNTY FINAL CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE 2013-2025 Kitsap County UGA Sizing and Composition Remand August 2012 Prepared For: Kitsap County Special Projects Division 614 Division St. MS-4 Port Orchard, WA 98366 Contact: Angie Silva Special Projects Planner/Policy Analyst Phone: (360) 337-4841 Email: [email protected] Principal Authors: BERK 2025 First Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 324-8760 Project Management, Finance, Public Services Parametrix 4660 Kitsap Way, Suite A Bremerton, WA 98312 (360) 377-0014 Transportation and Infrastructure Contributors: BHC Consultants Kitsap County Community Development Department Kitsap County Department of Administrative Services Kitsap County Information Services Department Kitsap County Parks and Recreation Department Kitsap County Public Works Department Kitsap County Sheriff Kitsap County Special Projects Division In consultation with Kitsap County Special Districts and Municipal Service Providers FINAL CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE Kitsap County Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Contents of the Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Growth Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern
    © Copyright 2016 Anna K. Fern A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2016 Committee: Charles Williams Caroline Hartse Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences University of Washington Abstract A Temporary Hometown: Gendered Labor and Social Citizenship in Bremerton, Washington, a Domestic Military Colony Anna K. Fern Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Charles Williams School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Evelyn Nakano Glenn’s application of T. H. Marshall’s tripartite citizenship (2002) informs intersectional understandings of racialized and gendered labor in the historic development of the United States’ imperial colonialism and military industry. Recent place attachment studies challenge assumptions of belonging, home and civic responsibility aligned with social class, while current gentrification and revitalization scholarship reveals neoliberal sustainability practices that maintain unspoken class bias. Social citizenship, gendered labor and vice economy experiences for residents in domestic post-industrial gentrified cities that demonstrate parallels with global US military colonies are not readily documented. This mixed-methods study addresses social construction of home and belonging for residents of a vice labor and military veteran class in Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington, a western US military manufacturing and base city. This thesis seeks to explain how and why some workers and residents in the city of Bremerton, Washington have been historically marginalized, even as their roles, framed as patriotic contributions, have been integral to the socioeconomic efforts and successes of the dominant militarized culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Resources Protection Program
    W.W.I.R.P.P. SERIES-NO. 5 INSTREAM RESOURCES PROTECTION PROGRAM KITSAP WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 15 Including PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE RULES STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY JUNE 1981 INSTREAM RESOURCES PROTECTION PROGRAM KITSAP WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 15 including PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Prepared by Water Resources Policy Development Section Washington State Department of Ecology Project Planner, Jeanne Holloman (206) 753-6189 Washington State Department of Printing Olympia, Washington June 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 4 PROGRAM AREA DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 12 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................. 14 Streams and Lakes.......................................................................................................... 14 Ground Waters ............................................................................................................... 22 WATER USE..................................................................................................................... ........ 24 INSTREAM USES...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment October 1997
    Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment October 1997 Open File Technical Report No. 97-04 Prepared by: Kitsap Public Utility District in association with: Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., Pacific Groundwater Group, Inc. Robinson & Noble, Inc., KCM, Inc. Prepared in cooperation with Washington State Department of Ecology NW Regional Office Water Resource Program 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 P:\basindoc\version3\toc October 3, 1997 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Initial Watershed Assessments..........................................................................1-1 1.2 Kitsap County Portion of Water Resource Inventory Area 15..........................1-1 1.3 Information Sources..........................................................................................1-2 2. Basin Description 2.1 Area Description...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Subareas ............................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Land Cover and Land Use.................................................................................2-2 2.4 Climate ..............................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Water Balance ...................................................................................................2-4 2.6 Population .........................................................................................................2-4 3. Precipitation
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report
    Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report Monitoring Year 2016 - 2017 03/11/2019 RESOURCES L NATURA DNR monitors abundance and depth distribution of native seagrasses to determine status and trends in greater Puget Sound through the Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Program (SVMP) (https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic-science/nearshore-habitat-eelgrass- monitoring). The Submerged Vegetation Monitoring Program is a component of the Puget Sound Ecosystem Monitoring Program (PSEMP) (https://sites.google.com/a/psemp.org/psemp/home). Cover Photo: Eelgrass at Dumas Bay, Federal Way. Photo credit: Lisa Ferrier. Puget Sound Seagrass Monitoring Report Monitoring Year 2016 - 2017 03/11/2019 Bart Christiaen Lisa Ferrier Pete Dowty Jeff Gaeckle Helen Berry Nearshore Habitat Program Aquatic Resources Division Acknowledgements The Nearshore Habitat Program is part of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Aquatic Resources Division, the steward for State Owned Aquatic Lands. Program funding is provided through the Aquatics Resource Management Cost Account (RMCA). The Nearshore Habitat Program monitors and evaluates the status and trends of marine vegetation for DNR and the Puget Sound Partnership. The Nearshore Habitat Program is grateful to several governmental entities that have provided funding for DNR to expand seagrass monitoring in their areas of interest. Entities that have funded specific studies include: the Suquamish Tribe, the City of Bainbridge Island, the City of Bellingham, King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks – Wastewater Treatment Division, the DNR Aquatic Reserves Program, and Washington State Parks. The following document fulfills DNR’s Eelgrass Monitoring Performance measure. It also fulfills tasks in the Puget Sound Partnership’s Action Agenda by providing information on the status and trends of one of the selected indicators of environmental health in Puget Sound.
    [Show full text]