Flappie Met Pruimen?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flappie Met Pruimen? Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Tine Ketelaars Flappie met pruimen? Een analyse van de ambiguïteit in de Westerse mens- dierverhouding. Masterproef voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de Moraalwetenschappen Academiejaar 2011-2012 Promotor Prof. dr. Johan Braeckman Vakgroep Wijsbegeerte en Moraalwetenschap 1 2 Dankwoord Onze interactie met dieren is een onderwerp gebleken dat weinig mensen onberoerd laat. Ik kreeg geregeld een mailtje met een artikel, een link, een weetje of een tip. Velen maakten mij deelgenoot van hun ideeën omtrent de mens-dierrelatie. Allerhande gesprekken leverden interessante denkpistes op, nieuwe invalshoeken en inzichten. Het zou mij te ver leiden om alle mensen op te sommen die ik dankbaar ben, maar weet dat ik jullie hulp en steun enorm waardeer. Dank jullie wel, liefste vrienden en familieleden! Mijn ouders verdienen op de eerste plaats een welgemeend woord van dank, omdat ik van hen moraalwetenschappen mocht studeren ondanks het feit dat ik reeds een diploma behaald had. Zij begrijpen de drang tot zelfontplooiing en mijn grote wens om een zorgboerderij op te richten, geven mij alle kansen en steunen mij onvoorwaardelijk. Mama en papa, dank jullie wel! Andere mensen die een dankwoordje verdienen zijn mijn tweelingzus Lore, mijn broer Lander en mijn vriend Thomas. Jullie stonden altijd klaar met woord en daad, lazen vele hoofdstukken zorgvuldig na en gaven zeer gewaardeerde opbouwende kritiek. Ook dank aan Bregt voor de onvoorwaardelijke vriendschap en steun. Een aantal mensen hebben mij geheel belangeloos bijgestaan met hun expertise. Dank aan Prof. Dr. Luc Crevits voor de uitleg in verband met hersencircuits en spiegelneuronen. Dank ook aan Prof. Dr. Gie van den Berghe, voor de correspondentie over de mens-dierrelatie in Nazi-Duitsland, de nuanceringen en verdiepingen van mijn onderzoeksthema en voor uw betrokkenheid. Dr. Pieter De Leemans, dank voor het uitlenen van de zes volumes ‘A Cultural History of Animals’. Prof. Dr. Samantha Hurn, dank voor uw zinvolle opmerkingen over de uitgewerkte ideeën in mijn essay. Mr. Tobias Leenaert, dank voor het opsturen van uw thesis en de tips. Maar bovenal ben ik Prof. Dr. Johan Braeckman dankbaar, voor de ondersteuning, de grote interesse, expertise en hulp om dit werk tot een goed einde te brengen. 3 4 Inhoudsopgave DANKWOORD.................................................................................................................................... 3 INLEIDING .......................................................................................................................................... 7 HOOFDSTUK 1 DE MENS IS EEN VREEMD BEESTJE.......................................................................... 9 1.1 DE RUIMERE CONTEXT .............................................................................................................. 9 1.2 ETHISCHE RELEVANTIE .............................................................................................................10 1.3 DE ROUTEPLANNING ...............................................................................................................11 HOOFDSTUK 2 DE ONDERZOEKSVRAAG ........................................................................................13 HOOFDSTUK 3 HET ONDERZOEKSDOMEIN VAN DE ANTROZOÖLOGIE ..........................................14 3.1 ANTROZOÖLOGIE ...................................................................................................................14 3.2 OORSPRONG EN ONTWIKKELING. ...............................................................................................15 3.3 VOOR- EN TEGENSTANDERS. .....................................................................................................17 HOOFDSTUK 4 DE GESCHIEDENIS VAN DE MENSDIERRELATIE.......................................................18 4.1 INLEIDING ............................................................................................................................18 4.2 DE PREHISTORIE .....................................................................................................................20 4.3 DE NEOLITHISCHE REVOLUTIE EN DE VROEGE BESCHAVINGEN ..........................................................21 4.4 DE GRIEKSE OUDHEID .............................................................................................................27 4.5 DE ROMEINSE TIJD .................................................................................................................33 4.6 DE MIDDELEEUWEN EN HET CHRISTENDOM .................................................................................38 4.7 DE RENAISSANCE ...................................................................................................................54 4.8 DE VERLICHTING EN DE INDUSTRIËLE REVOLUTIE ...........................................................................63 4.9 DE MODERNE TIJD .................................................................................................................70 4.10 OVERZICHT VAN DE BELANGRIJKSTE VISIES. ..................................................................................73 HOOFDSTUK 5 VERKLARINGEN VOOR DE AMBIGUÏTEIT IN DE WESTERSE MENS-DIERRELATIE .....81 5.1 PSYCHOLOGISCHE BESCHERMINGSMECHANISMEN. ........................................................................81 5 5.2 BIOLOGISCHE VERKLARINGEN ....................................................................................................99 5.3 TAAL .................................................................................................................................107 HOOFDSTUK 6 EINDCONCLUSIE...................................................................................................113 6.1 HET BELANG VAN DE CONTEXT ................................................................................................113 6.2 DE BELANGRIJKSTE VISIES .......................................................................................................115 6.3 DE VERKLARINGEN ...............................................................................................................115 6.4 NOTIES VOOR VERDER ONDERZOEK ..........................................................................................117 APPENDIX A: DE BELL CURVE THEORIE - GENDER EN ATTITUDES TEN OPZICHTE VAN DIEREN. ........................................................................................................................................118 APPENDIX B: EEN SCHULDIGE HOND - ANTROPOMORFISME IN D E MENS- DIERRELATIE. ..............................................................................................................................120 APPENDIX C: AGNOSTEN IN DE 18E, 19E EN 20STE EEUW. ............................................124 BIJLAGE 1: DIERCATEGORIEËN VAN AERTS. ET AL. .........................................................................127 BIJLAGE 2: DE VERGELIJKING VAN MENSEN EN DIEREN OP BASIS VAN UITERLIJK EN VERONDERSTELDE KARAKTEREIGENSCHAPPEN. ............................................................................128 BIJLAGE 3: WHY MAN IS MAN ........................................................................................................129 BIJLAGE 4: NEOTENIE EN HET WWF-LOGO .....................................................................................130 BIJLAGE 5: GEDEELDE BIOLOGISCHE CONSTITUTIE. ........................................................................131 REFERENTIES ..................................................................................................................................134 ARTIKELS EN BOEKEN: ..................................................................................................................134 WEBSITES ....................................................................................................................................142 6 Inleiding Al van kindsaf aan ben ik gefascineerd door de natuur in het algemeen, en door dieren in het bijzonder. Vandaar mijn grote enthousiasme toen ik mij mocht verdiepen in de uiterst intrigerende mens-dierrelatie. Ik heb lange tijd nagedacht over de inconsistenties in ons gedrag - waar ik overigens ook niet vrij van ben1. Jarenlang kon ik niet bevatten waarom mensen met huisdieren bijvoorbeeld vlees eten. De één ziet Flappie als een geliefd huisdier, de ander ziet eerder een delicatesse rondhuppelen. We geven voedseldieren echter nooit een naam; geen enkel restaurant heeft ‘Flappie met pruimen’ of ‘Bella in Madeirasaus’ op het menu staan. Zodra we een dier een naam geven, wordt het namelijk een subject waarmee we ons kunnen identificeren. We houden de categoriën ‘huisdier’ en ‘vlees – voorheen anoniem levend wezen’ liever gescheiden. Vandaar de titel van dit werk: ‘Flappie met pruimen’ doorbreekt deze categorieën en zet ons aan om na te denken over onze omgang met dieren. Ik wens de lezer veel leesplezier!!! 1 Overdag vis ik muggen uit de regenton, omdat ik niet wil dat ze verdrinken, maar als ze ’s avonds rond mijn oren zoemen sla ik ze wel dood. 7 8 Hoofdstuk 1 DE MENS IS EEN VREEMD BEESTJE Er was eens een slager in een klein idyllisch dorpje in West-Vlaanderen. Geen haar op zijn hoofd dat er aan dacht om paardenvlees te verkopen; daarvoor hield hij te veel van zijn eigen paard. Ook zijn hond kwam niets te kort. Maar uit protest tegen de fois-du-gras actie van GAIA, had hij in plaats van 12 kilo zo’n 15 kilo ganzenlever besteld om te verkopen. Andere anekdotische voorbeelden
Recommended publications
  • Karaoke Catalog Updated On: 24/04/2017 Sing Online on Entire Catalog
    Karaoke catalog Updated on: 24/04/2017 Sing online on www.karafun.com Entire catalog TOP 50 Uptown Funk - Bruno Mars All Of Me - John Legend Blue Ain't Your Color - Keith Urban Shape of You - Ed Sheeran Jackson - Johnny Cash 24K Magic - Bruno Mars EXPLICIT Tennessee Whiskey - Chris Stapleton Piano Man - Billy Joel Unchained Melody - The Righteous Brothers Sweet Caroline - Neil Diamond House Of The Rising Sun - The Animals I Want It That Way - Backstreet Boys Don't Stop Believing - Journey Black Velvet - Alannah Myles Sweet Home Alabama - Lynyrd Skynyrd Girl Crush - Little Big Town Before He Cheats - Carrie Underwood (Sittin' On) The Dock Of The Bay - Otis Redding Friends In Low Places - Garth Brooks My Way - Frank Sinatra Santeria - Sublime Ring Of Fire - Johnny Cash Turn The Page - Bob Seger Killing Me Softly - The Fugees Bohemian Rhapsody - Queen Love on the Brain - Rihanna EXPLICIT He Stopped Loving Her Today - George Jones Can't Help Falling In Love - Elvis Presley Take Me Home, Country Roads - John Denver Wannabe - Spice Girls Folsom Prison Blues - Johnny Cash Can't Stop The Feeling - Trolls Love Shack - The B-52's Summer Nights - Grease Closer - The Chainsmokers I Will Survive - Gloria Gaynor Crazy - Patsy Cline Amarillo By Morning - George Strait A Whole New World - Aladdin Let It Go - Idina Menzel Wagon Wheel - Darius Rucker At Last - Etta James How Far I'll Go - Moana These Boots Are Made For Walkin' - Nancy Sinatra Strawberry Wine - Deana Carter My Girl - The Temptations Sweet Child O'Mine - Guns N' Roses Fly Me To The Moon
    [Show full text]
  • Onderwijsrecensies Basisonderwijs 2015 - 1 4-6 Jaar Prentenboeken
    Onderwijsrecensies basisonderwijs 2015 - 1 4-6 jaar Prentenboeken 2014-29-3450 Bon, Annemarie • Hiep hiep Haas! Niveau/leeftijd : AK Winkelprijs : € 14.95 Hiep hiep Haas! / Annemarie Bon ; met illustraties van Gertie Jaquet. - Amsterdam : Bijzonderheden : J1/J2/EX/ Moon, [2014]. - 26 ongenummerde pagina's : illustraties ; 30 cm Volgnummer : 44 / 173 ISBN 978-90-443-4521-6 Nog een nachtje slapen en dan is Haas jarig. Een verjaardagsfeest organiseren kost veel energie en tijd. Als Haas om acht uur naar bed gaat is hij best moe, maar slapen kan hij niet. Dan maar weer zijn bed uit! De hele nacht blijft hij doorgaan, waarbij brokken worden gemaakt en de taart verbrandt. Uitgeput valt hij ten slotte in slaap en wordt pas weer wakker als de feestgangers om zijn bed staan te zingen. Grappig, vlot leesbaar prentenboek met duidelijke tekst. De illustraties, in krijt stift en verf, zijn feestelijk gekleurd en in wisselende afmetingen. Ze zijn speels over de bladzijden verdeeld en sluiten naadloos aan op de situaties. Op elke pagina is een spinnetje verstopt en oplettende kleuters kunnen het tijdsverloop via tal van klokken volgen. Herkenbaar verhaal over de opwinding rondom een verjaardag. Vanaf ca. 4 jaar. Nelleke Hulscher-Meihuizen 2014-27-1933 Heruitgave Burton, Virginia Lee • Het huisje dat verhuisde *zie a.i.'s deze week voor nog vier prentenboeken uit de reeks 'Lemniscaat Het huisje dat verhuisde / Virginia Lee Burton ; vertaling [uit het Engels]: L.M. Niskos. Kroonjuweel'. - Vierde druk. - Rotterdam : Lemniscaat, 2014. - 44 ongenummerde pagina's : illustraties ; 24 × 26 cm. - (Lemniscaat Kroonjuweel). - Vertaling van: The little house. Niveau/leeftijd : AK - Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]
  • Illuminating the Past
    Published by PhotoBook Press 2836 Lyndale Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55408 Designed at the School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 216 Lenoir Drive CB#3360, 100 Manning Hall Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3360 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is committed to equality of educational opportunity. The University does not discriminate in o fering access to its educational programs and activities on the basis of age, gender, race, color, national origin, religion, creed, disability, veteran’s status or sexual orientation. The Dean of Students (01 Steele Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-5100 or 919.966.4042) has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the University’s non-discrimination policies. © 2007 Illuminating the Past A history of the first 75 years of the University of North Carolina’s School of Information and Library Science Illuminating the past, imagining the future! Dear Friends, Welcome to this beautiful memory book for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Information and Library Science (SILS). As part of our commemoration of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the School, the words and photographs in these pages will give you engaging views of the rich history we share. These are memories that do indeed illuminate our past and chal- lenge us to imagine a vital and innovative future. In the 1930’s when SILS began, the United States had fallen from being the land of opportunity to a country focused on eco- nomic survival. The income of the average American family had fallen by 40%, unemployment was at 25% and it was a perilous time for public education, with most communities struggling to afford teachers and textbooks for their children.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Fischer's CV
    BOB FISCHER [email protected] Department of Philosophy bobfischer.net Texas State University orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-393X 601 University Drive 512.245.2403 San Marcos, TX 78666 EMPLOYMENT Texas State University: Associate Professor of Philosophy 2019-present Texas State University: Assistant Professor of Philosophy 2013-2019 Texas State University: Senior Lecturer 2011-2013 EDUCATION University of Illinois at Chicago, Ph.D., Philosophy 2006-2011 Dissertation: Modal Knowledge, in Theory Director: W. D. Hart State University of New York at Geneseo, B.A., English & Philosophy 2001-2004 PUBLICATIONS BOOKS AUTHORED What Do We Owe Other Animals? Under contract with Routledge. (w/ Anja Jauernig) Wildlife Ethics: Animal Ethics in Wildlife Management and Conservation. Under contract with Blackwell. (w/ Christian Gamborg, Jordan Hampton, Clare Palmer, and Peter Sandøe) Animal Ethics — A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2021. The Ethics of Eating Animals: Usually Bad, Sometimes Wrong, Often Permissible. New York: Routledge, 2020. Modal Justification via Theories. Synthese Library. Cham: Springer, 2017. BOOKS EDITED A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox, 5th Edition. Under contract with Oxford University Press. (w/ Anthony Weston) Ethics, Left and Right: The Moral Issues That Divide Us. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. College Ethics: A Reader on Moral Issues That Affect You, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. (1st Edition: 2017) The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics. New York: Routledge, 2020. Modal Epistemology After Rationalism. Synthese Library. Cham: Springer, 2017. (w/ Felipe Leon) The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. (w/ Ben Bramble) ARTICLES & BOOK CHAPTERS “Animal Agriculture, Wet Markets, and COVID-19: A Case Study in Indirect Activism.” Food Ethics, forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Chimpanzee Rights: the Philosophers' Brief
    Chimpanzee Rights: The Philosophers’ Brief By Kristin Andrews Gary Comstock G.K.D. Crozier Sue Donaldson Andrew Fenton Tyler M. John L. Syd M Johnson Robert C. Jones Will Kymlicka Letitia Meynell Nathan Nobis David M. Peña-Guzmán Jeff Sebo 1 For Kiko and Tommy 2 Contents Acknowledgments…4 Preface Chapter 1 Introduction: Chimpanzees, Rights, and Conceptions of Personhood….5 Chapter 2 The Species Membership Conception………17 Chapter 3 The Social Contract Conception……….48 Chapter 4 The Community Membership Conception……….69 Chapter 5 The Capacities Conception……….85 Chapter 6 Conclusions……….115 Index 3 Acknowledgements The authors thank the many people who have helped us throughout the development of this book. James Rocha, Bernard Rollin, Adam Shriver, and Rebecca Walker were fellow travelers with us on the amicus brief, but were unable to follow us to the book. Research assistants Andrew Lopez and Caroline Vardigans provided invaluable support and assistance at crucial moments. We have also benefited from discussion with audiences at the Stanford Law School and Dalhousie Philosophy Department Colloquium, where the amicus brief was presented, and from the advice of wise colleagues, including Charlotte Blattner, Matthew Herder, Syl Ko, Tim Krahn, and Gordon McOuat. Lauren Choplin, Kevin Schneider, and Steven Wise patiently helped us navigate the legal landscape as we worked on the brief, related media articles, and the book, and they continue to fight for freedom for Kiko and Tommy, and many other nonhuman animals. 4 1 Introduction: Chimpanzees, Rights, and Conceptions of Personhood In December 2013, the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) filed a petition for a common law writ of habeas corpus in the New York State Supreme Court on behalf of Tommy, a chimpanzee living alone in a cage in a shed in rural New York (Barlow, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Guardianship of Animals.Pdf
    Edna Cardozo Dias Lawyer, PhD in Law, Legal Consultant and University Professor The Legal Guardianship of Animals Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais 2020 © 2020 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS Editor Edna Cardozo Dias Final art Aderivaldo Sousa Santos Review Maria Celia Aun Cardozo, Edna The Legal Guardianship of Animals / — Edna Cardozo Dias: Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais - 2020 - 3ª edition. 346 p. 1. I.Título. Printed in Brazil All rights reserved Requests for this work Internet site shopping: amazon.com.br and amazon.com. Email: [email protected] 2 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS I dedicate this book To the common mother of all beings - the Earth - which contains the essence of all that lives, which feeds us from all joys, in the hope that this work may inaugurate a new era, marked by a firm purpose to restore the animal’s dignity, and the human being commitment with an ethic of life. THE LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP OF A NIMALS 3 Appreciate Professor Arthur Diniz, advisor of my doctoral thesis, defended at the Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, which was the first thesis on animal law in Brazil in February 2000, introducing this new branch of law in the academic and scientific world, starting the elaboration of a “Animal Rights Theory”. 4 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS Sumário Chapter 1 - PHILOSOPHY AND ANIMALS .................................................. 15 1.1 The Greeks 1.1.1 The Pre-Socratic 1.1.2 The Sophists 1.1.3 The Socratic Philosophy 1.1.4 Plato 1.1.5 Peripathetism 1.1.6 Epicureanism 1.1.7 The Stoic Philosophy 1.2 The Biblical View - The Saints and the Animals 1.2.1 St.
    [Show full text]
  • CRITICAL TERMS for ANIMAL STUDIES
    CRITICAL TERMS for ANIMAL STUDIES Edited by LORI GRUEN THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS Chicago and London Contents Introduction • Lori Gruen 1 1 Abolition • Claire Jean Kim 15 2 Activism • Jeff Sebo and Peter Singer 33 3 Anthropocentrism • Fiona Probyn- Rapsey 47 4 Behavior • Alexandra Horowitz 64 5 Biopolitics • Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel 79 6 Captivity • Lori Marino 99 7 Difference • Kari Weil 112 8 Emotion • Barbara J. King 125 9 Empathy • Lori Gruen 141 10 Ethics • Alice Crary 154 11 Extinction • Thom van Dooren 169 12 Kinship • Agustín Fuentes and Natalie Porter 182 13 Law • Kristen Stilt 197 14 Life • Eduardo Kohn 210 15 Matter • James K. Stanescu 222 16 Mind • Kristin Andrews 234 17 Pain • Victoria A. Braithwaite 251 18 Personhood • Colin Dayan 267 19 Postcolonial • Maneesha Deckha 280 20 Rationality • Christine M. Korsgaard 294 21 Representation • Robert R. McKay 307 22 Rights • Will Kymlicka and Sue Donaldson 320 23 Sanctuary • Timothy Pachirat 337 24 Sentience • Gary Varner 356 25 Sociality • Cynthia Willett and Malini Suchak 370 26 Species • Harriet Ritvo 383 27 Vegan • Annie Potts and Philip Armstrong 395 28 Vulnerability • Anat Pick 410 29 Welfare • Clare Palmer and Peter Sandøe 424 Acknowledgments 439 List of Contributors 441 Index 451 INTRODUCTION Lori Gruen Animal Studies is almost always described as a new, emerging, and growing field. A short while ago some Animal Studies scholars suggested that it “has a way to go before it can clearly see itself as an academic field” (Gorman 2012). Other scholars suggest that the “discipline” is a couple of decades old (DeMello 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Normative Practices of Other Animals
    3 NORMATIVE PRACTICES OF OTHER ANIMALS Sarah Vincent, Rebecca Ring, and Kristin Andrews Introduction Traditionally, discussions of moral participation—and in particular moral agency—have focused on fully formed human actors. There has been some interest in the development of morality in humans, as well as interest in cultural differences when it comes to moral practices, commitments, and actions. However, until relatively recently, there has been little focus on the possibility that nonhuman animals have any role to play in morality, save being the objects of moral concern (e.g., DeGrazia, 1996 ; Gruen, 2002 ; Rollin, 2007 ; Singer, 1975 ). Moreover, when nonhuman cases are considered as evidence of moral agency or subjecthood,1 there has been an anthropocentric tendency to focus on those behaviors that inform our attributions of moral agency to humans. For example, some argue that the ability to evaluate the princi- ples upon which a moral norm is grounded is required for full moral agency (e.g., Korsgaard, 1992 , 2006 , 2010 ; Rowlands, 2012 ). Certainly, if a moral agent must understand what makes an action right or wrong, then most nonhuman animals would not qualify (and perhaps some humans, too). However, if we are to understand the evolution of moral psychology and moral practice, we need to turn our attention to the foundations of full moral agency. We must fi rst pay attention to the more broadly normative practices of other animals.2 In part 1 of this chapter, we will examine the recent attention to animal moral practice by philosophers and animal cognition researchers and argue that their approach underes- timates the distribution of normative practice in animals by focusing on highly developed versions of morality.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter **: Animals Rights
    21 MARCH 2019 Cruelty Against animals PROFESSOR JOANNA BOURKE Jean-Honoré Fragonard’s ‘Girl Making a Dog Dance on Her Bed’ was painted in the late 1760s. The painting is typical of his decadent style, with its warm tones, luxuriant brushwork, and energetic celebration of pleasure. In the painting, a young girl lies back on her bed, holding a small spaniel whose tail moves between her legs, caressing her vulva and buttocks. Its phallic energy is palpable. The girl’s bedside table is open, a visual allegory of her receptivity to sensual advances. The cool blue ribbon of the girl’s nightcap is echoed in the bow of the spaniel: the two beautiful creatures are in harmony. ‘Girl Making a Dog Dance on Her Bed’ is a scene of reciprocal adoration and erotic enjoyment. I have chosen this painting to begin my talk because it is a scene of mutuality between a girl and a dog and – to be frank – most of my talk today is about disharmony – or, worse, outright cruelty. As a species, homo sapiens are singularly bad at “loving animals”. We admire exotic “wildlife”, while destroying their habitats. We are distressed by unkind treatment of animals but regulate slaughter within abattoirs. Western lifestyles are wholly dependent upon farming animals, which involve practices of extraordinary cruelty. Philosopher Jacques Derrida invented a term to describe human-animal relationships: “carno-phallogocentrism”. In other words, our treatment of animals is based on privileging masculine traits (“phallo”) and the possession of language (“logos”); it involves a willingness to kill and eat other sentient beings (“carno”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Mercy: Organized Animal Protection in the United States 1866-1930
    CHAPTERI "THEYOUGHT TO BE THEOBJECTS OF OURBENEVOLENT REGARDS": THEANTE CEDENTSOF ORGANIZED ANIMALPROTECTION INTHE UNITED ST A TES Is it not sufficientfor man to absorb the useful labors and livesof the inferior creation, without superaddiogexcessive anguish. wantand misery? Whenhis own cup of suffering is fulland overflowing. desperateresort to revolutionsometimes rids him of his crueltormentors and taskmasters. But of the inferior animals, generations aftergene rations sufferand expire without any chanceof reliefor redress, unless it begranted by the generosityand justice of man. - Julius Ames,The Spirit of Humanity( 1835) When the anti-crueltymovement in the United States coalesced during the 1860s, it tookroot in a society in which the animal protectionimpulse already had some currency. Beforethe Civil War, some Americans gave their attention to the mistreatment of animals as a social problem, exploring its religious, moral, and legal dimensions. Although no sustained effortsto prevent cruelty to animals ensued, these Americans explored some of the same issues that would lead a later generation to found animal protectionsocieties. A handfulof American thinkers, forinst ance, joined their European contemporaries in settling upon animals' capacity for suffering as the decisive reason for according them better treatment. Nineteenth century Evangelicalism's embrace of Old Testament admonitions on the moral duty to treat animals well reinforced such concern. During the sameperiod, the kindness-to animals-ethic gained recognition as a critical constituent of childhood socialization. In addition, persistent dissatisfactionwith the 14 IS public mistreatment of animals leda number of states to pass statutes that prohibited acts of cruelty. Finally, concernfor animals was tied to several social movements of the antebellum period.
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon and the Intellectual Formation of Animal Rights in America
    Violence, Animals, and Egalitarianism: Audubon and the Intellectual Formation of Animal Rights in America Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Daniel Aaron Vandersommers, B.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Randolph Roth, Advisor John L. Brooke Steven Conn Copyright by Daniel Aaron Vandersommers 2010 Abstract This thesis presents an intellectual microhistory of John James Audubon and his peculiar conceptions of humans and animals. Instead of making the images found in his Birds of America, The Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America and Ornithological Biography the object of study, this thesis examines Audubon’s journals for his penned descriptions of nonhumans. This thesis argues that while Audubon, at first glance, may seem to have held contradictory conceptions of nonhumans, he, in fact, found consistency through an egalitarian worldview based on an animus for social power. Audubon recognized the biological differences that separated humans from nonhumans and that distinguished all species of organisms from each other, but these biological differences did not determine the rhetorical stances that he took toward animals. Audubon’s rhetorical stances toward humans and animals depended on whether he perceived these creatures gaining or losing agency from power structures. Audubon’s ethical principle was simple. If an organism advanced itself in the order of things by utilizing social institutions and exercising social power, this organism deserved moral condemnation. If an organism was controlled or victimized by these institutions, this organism deserved sympathy. The following examination will be divided into four chapters.
    [Show full text]