DOCSLIB.ORG

Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2Nd Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2Nd Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook PARTY AND PROCEDURE IN THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jacob R Straus | 9781442258747 | | | | | Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2nd edition PDF Book Texas Monthly Press. A member of the House is referred to as a representative , congressman , or congresswoman. Straus and Matthew E. Congress U. CBS News. Delivery not available. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. November 6, Each House committee and subcommittee is led by a chairman always a member of the majority party. An "open rule" permits all germane amendments, but a "closed rule" restricts or even prohibits amendment. They may retire with reduced benefits at ages 55 to 59 after five years of service. June 28, A convicted official is automatically removed from office and may be disqualified from holding future office under the United States. Each state is entitled to at least one representative, however small its population. Tulsa, Oklahoma. This section does not cite any sources. House rules prevent a member from making a point of order that a quorum is not present unless a question is being voted on. The number of voting representatives is fixed by law at Send me an email when my question is answered. Cancel Submit. FOX News. Lower house of the United States Congress. Brady, David W. This post—Civil War provision was intended to prevent those who sided with the Confederacy from serving. Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2nd edition Writer Gavels Mace of the House Seal of the Senate. US Dept. The Committee meets in the House chamber; it may consider and amend bills, but may not grant them final passage. Straus , Matthew E. The states of Washington and California now [ when? Reconciliation and Revival: James R. Together they compose the national bicameral legislature of the United States. However, the North held no such advantage in the Senate, where the equal representation of states prevailed. In the instance when the presidency and both Houses of Congress are controlled by one party, the speaker normally takes a low profile and defers to the president. Office of the Historian. Specifications Language English. Virgin Islands. Power is nowhere concentrated; it is rather deliberately and of set policy scattered amongst many small chiefs. Each House committee and subcommittee is led by a chairman always a member of the majority party. As of the Census , the largest delegation is that of California , with 53 representatives. The smaller states, however, favored the New Jersey Plan , which called for a unicameral Congress with equal representation for the states. About This Item. Guide Board Congr. Dierenfield, Bruce J. Debate on a bill is generally restricted to one hour, equally divided between the majority and minority parties. He teaches courses on the Congress and interest groups as an adjunct professor at Catholic University in Washington, D. Federal government. Forge of Democracy: The House of Representatives. Presently, the District of Columbia and the five inhabited U. Audio help More spoken articles. In most cases, members do not refer to each other only by name, but also by state, using forms such as "the gentleman from Virginia," "the distinguished gentlewoman from California," or "my distinguished friend from Alabama. House U. Adler, E. Each member may employ no more than 18 permanent employees. Archived from the original on September 26, Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2nd edition Reviews In , Republicans under Newt Gingrich set a limit of three two-year terms for committee chairs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Add to list. Accessed November 23, It is essential to understand the combined impact of political parties, organization, and the role and use of procedure. Closed session list Saxbe fix. It is also used during the inaugural ceremonies for all presidents of the United States. House members are eligible for a Member's Representational Allowance MRA to support them in their official and representational duties to their district. Each state is entitled to at least one representative, however small its population. Some joint committees oversee independent government bodies; for instance, the Joint Committee on the Library oversees the Library of Congress. By length of service historically Current members by wealth From multiple states Died in office Killed or wounded in office Party switchers. The largest committee of the House is the Committee of the Whole , which, as its name suggests, consists of all members of the House. Likewise a State could not establish additional qualifications. Each state determines its own district boundaries, either through legislation or through non-partisan panels. The chaplain leads the House in prayer at the opening of the day. Current selection is: Paperback. The presiding officer sits in a chair in the front of the House chamber. The sergeant at arms is the House's chief law enforcement officer and maintains order and security on House premises. Missouri's Cannon in the House. Unanimous consent Salaries. Each representative must: 1 be at least twenty-five years old; 2 have been a citizen of the United States for the past seven years; and 3 be at the time of the election an inhabitant of the state they represent. A True Story of Washington. Berman, Daniel M. The House is commonly referred to as the lower house and the Senate the upper house , although the United States Constitution does not use that terminology. Senate during the session. It is divided up, as it were, into forty-seven seigniories, in each of which a Standing Committee is the court-baron and its chairman lord-proprietor. Individually, each book chapter can stand on its own, but together these works paint a fascinating picture of the strategic use of procedural rules in the modern Congress. That bill proposes to increase the House membership by two, making members, by converting the District of Columbia delegate into a member, and until the census grant one membership to Utah , which is the state next in line to receive an additional district based on its population after the Census. Wikimedia Commons Wikinews. Members are not required to live in the districts they represent, but they traditionally do. In addition, five, non-voting Delegates represent the District of Columbia and the U. Retrieved March 5, The late 19th and early 20th centuries also saw a dramatic increase in the power of the speaker of the House. Update location. Party and Procedure in the United States Congress 2nd edition Read Online After a census is taken in a year ending in 0 , the year ending in 2 is the first year in which elections for U. Retrieved September 21, Tulsa World. Archived from the original on October 9, The House is commonly referred to as the lower house and the Senate the upper house , although the United States Constitution does not use that terminology. Ch10 Partisanship Filibustering and Reform in the Senate. This includes everything from payroll to foodservice. London: The Macmillan Company. The presiding officer is the speaker of the House , who is elected by the members thereof and is therefore traditionally the leader of the controlling party. Albert, Carl; Goble, Danney Bandemer , the Supreme Court held that gerrymandered districts could be struck down based on the Equal Protection Clause , but the Court did not articulate a standard for when districts are impermissibly gerrymandered. House U. Straus and Matthew E. Archived from the original on April 1, These tables are occupied by members of the committee that have brought a bill to the floor for consideration and by the party leadership. Since its inception in , all representatives have been directly elected. A convicted official is automatically removed from office and may be disqualified from holding future office under the United States. Senate during the session. The rules were changed in to permit party caucuses to elect chairs, shifting power upward to the party leaders. The powers of the speaker included chairmanship of the influential Rules Committee and the ability to appoint members of other House committees. The Twelfth Amendment requires the House to choose from the three candidates with the highest numbers of electoral votes. Party and Procedure in the United States Congress. Namespaces Article Talk. Press of Kansas. However, the North held no such advantage in the Senate, where the equal representation of states prevailed. Lower houses of national legislatures. King, Frank J. Shop Our Brands. Under the Articles of Confederation , the Congress of the Confederation was a unicameral body with equal representation for each state, any of which could veto most actions. House of Representatives established the Office of the Sergeant at Arms. https://files8.webydo.com/9583014/UploadedFiles/D2436946-43FC-670C-223C-69FF471E8373.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583610/UploadedFiles/3835B1BB-152D-827D-5ADC-786A93188D7B.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583198/UploadedFiles/2449ED24-C279-9A03-8AEA-2830463FDA56.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9584494/UploadedFiles/1A39D39E-4D27-7066-C4B2-749E4246FA89.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/nellienordinjo/files/why-we-dont-talk-to-each-other-anymore-the-de-voicing-of-society-209.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583717/UploadedFiles/2451BF0D-2803-D501-67A7-AF526EFB3036.pdf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Constitution: a Bicentennial Chronicle, Nos. 14-18
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 300 290 SO 019 380 AUTHOR Mann, Shelia, Ed. TITLE This Constitution: A Bicentennial Chronicle, Nos. 14-18. INSTITUTION American Historical Association, Washington, D.C.; American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.; Project '87, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 87 NOTE 321p.; For related document, see ED 282 814. Some photographs may not reproduce clearly. AVAILABLE FROMProject '87, 1527 New Hampshire Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036 nos. 13-17 $4.00 each, no. 18 $6.00). PUB TYPE Collected Works - Serials (022) -- Historical Materials (060) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) JOURNAL CIT This Constitution; n14-17 Spr Sum Win Fall 1987 n18 Spr-Sum 1988 EDRS PRICE MFO1 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Class Activities; *Constitutional History; *Constitutional Law; History Instruction; Instructioral Materials; Lesson Plans; Primary Sources; Resource Materials; Secondary Education; Social Studies; United States Government (Course); *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Bicentennial; *United States Constitution ABSTRACT Each issue in this bicentennial series features articles on selected U.S. Constitution topics, along with a section on primary documents and lesson plans or class activities. Issue 14 features: (1) "The Political Economy of tne Constitution" (K. Dolbeare; L. Medcalf); (2) "ANew Historical Whooper': Creating the Art of the Constitutional Sesquicentennial" (K. Marling); (3) "The Founding Fathers and the Right to Bear Arms: To Keep the People Duly Armed" (R. Shalhope); and (4)"The Founding Fathers and the Right to Bear Arms: A Well-Regulated Militia" (L. Cress). Selected articles from issue 15 include: (1) "The Origins of the Constitution" (G.
    [Show full text]
  • WHTP-2009-06-National-Security-1.Pdf
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR Louis Fisher is Specialist in Constitutional Law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress. The views expressed here are personal, not institutional. Earlier in his career at the Library of Congress, Fisher worked for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 3, 2006. During his service with CRS he was Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers and research director of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fisher received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools. He is the author of eighteen books, including In the Name of National Security: Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case (2006), Presidential War Power (2d ed. 2004), Military Tribunals and Presidential Power (2005), The Politics of Executive Privilege (2004), American Constitutional Law (with Katy J. Harriger, 8th ed. 2009), Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the Presidency (5th ed. 2005), Nazi Saboteurs on Trial: A Military Tribunal and American Law (2003), and, most recently, The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America’s Freedoms (2008). He has received four book awards. Fisher has been invited to testify before Congress on such issues as war powers, state secrets, CIA whistle-blowing, covert spending, NSA surveillance, executive privilege, executive spending discretion, presidential reorganization authority, Congress and the Constitution, the legislative veto, the item veto, the pocket veto, recess appointments, the budget process, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, the balanced budget amendment, biennial budgeting, presidential impoundment powers, and executive lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capitol Dome
    THE CAPITOL DOME The Capitol in the Movies John Quincy Adams and Speakers of the House Irish Artists in the Capitol Complex Westward the Course of Empire Takes Its Way A MAGAZINE OF HISTORY PUBLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETYVOLUME 55, NUMBER 22018 From the Editor’s Desk Like the lantern shining within the Tholos Dr. Paula Murphy, like Peart, studies atop the Dome whenever either or both America from the British Isles. Her research chambers of Congress are in session, this into Irish and Irish-American contributions issue of The Capitol Dome sheds light in all to the Capitol complex confirms an import- directions. Two of the four articles deal pri- ant artistic legacy while revealing some sur- marily with art, one focuses on politics, and prising contributions from important but one is a fascinating exposé of how the two unsung artists. Her research on this side of can overlap. “the Pond” was supported by a USCHS In the first article, Michael Canning Capitol Fellowship. reveals how the Capitol, far from being only Another Capitol Fellow alumnus, John a palette for other artist’s creations, has been Busch, makes an ingenious case-study of an artist (actor) in its own right. Whether as the historical impact of steam navigation. a walk-on in a cameo role (as in Quiz Show), Throughout the nineteenth century, steam- or a featured performer sharing the marquee boats shared top billing with locomotives as (as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), the the most celebrated and recognizable motif of Capitol, Library of Congress, and other sites technological progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building As Completed, from Walter's Designs
    CHAPTER XVI THE BUILDING AS COMPLETED, FROM WALTER’S DESIGNS DWARD CLARK supervised the completion of the Capitol the old Senate Chamber being devoted to the court room and the west from the designs of Thomas U. Walter, leaving the building as front being used by the court officials for office and robing rooms.1 it stands to-day. The terraces on the west, north, and south are The attic story [Plate 223] is so arranged in each wing that the a part of the general landscape scheme of Frederick Law Olm- public has access from its corridors to the galleries of the House and Ested. The building consists of the central or old building, and two wings, Senate Chambers, with provision for the press and committee rooms or the Capitol extension, with the new Dome on the old building. facing the exterior walls of the building. Document rooms are also pro- The cellar [Plate 220] contained space on the central western vided on this floor. extension available for office and committee rooms. Other portions of Plates 224, 225, 225a show the eastern front of the building as the cellar are given up to the heating and ventilating apparatus, or are completed, the principal new features being the porticoes on the wings, used for storage. Beneath the center of the Dome a vault was built in which are similar to the central portico designed by Latrobe. Although the cellar to contain the remains of George Washington, but because of the original design of Thornton contemplated a central portico he did the objection of the family to his burial in the Capitol his body never not contemplate the broad flight of steps which extends to the ground rested in the contemplated spot.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Period (1763-1789) Part 3: Constitutional Convention
    Revolutionary Period (1763-1789) Part 3: Constitutional Convention The Constitutional Convention was held in 1787 in Philadelphia. Fifty-five delegates met to revise, or improve, the nation’s first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were so weak, the framers decided to a write a new constitution. The U.S. Constitution created a strong national government, but with limits against the abuse of power. After the convention ended, the states ratified the new constitution. Problems under the Delegates meet at States ratify the new Articles of Confederation Constitutional constitution. Examples: no president Convention in 1787 and States have too write a new constitution. much power The most important conflict at the Convention was over Another conflict was over the counting of slaves when representation in the legislative branch (Congress). determining the number of representatives each state received in the House of Representatives. Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Northern States Southern States -large state plan -small state plan -did not want to count -wanted to count -2-house legislature -1-house legislature slaves as part of the slaves as part of the -proportional -equal representation population population representation (population) Great Compromise 3/5 Compromise -2-house legislature -three-fifths of all -House of Representatives (proportional slaves would be representation) counted as part of the -Senate – equal representation (2 per population for state) representation Ratification Terms to Know Federalists – supported ratification of the Constitution Delegate - representative Federalist Papers – written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Framer - someone who and John Jay is support of ratification helped write the Constitution Anti-Federalists – opposed ratification of the Constitution, mainly Ratify - to approve or because it did not have a bill of rights accept .
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars
    THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars Scorecard & Voting Guide History About every two years, when Congress takes up an energy bill, the Big Oil Team and the Clean Energy Team go head to head on the floor of the U.S. Senate -- who will prevail and shape our nation’s energy policy? The final rosters for the two teams are now coming together, re- flecting Senators’ votes on energy and climate legislation. Senators earn their spot on the Big Oil Team by voting to maintain America’s ailing energy policy with its en- trenched big government subsidies for oil companies, lax oversight on safety and the environment for oil drilling, leases and permits for risky sources of oil, and appointments of regulators who have cozy relationships with the industry. Senators get onto the Clean Energy Team by voting for a new energy policy that will move Amer- ica away from our dangerous dependence on oil and other fossil fuels, and toward cleaner, safer sources of energy like wind, solar, geothermal, and sustainable biomass. This new direction holds the opportunity to make American power the energy technology of the future while creating jobs, strengthening our national security, and improving our environment. Introduction Lobbyists representing the two teams’ sponsors storm the halls of the Congress for months ahead of the votes to sway key players to vote for their side. The Big Oil Team’s sponsors, which include BP and the American Petroleum Institute (API), use their colossal spending power to hire sly K-Street lobbyists who make closed-door deals with lawmakers, sweetened with sizable campaign contribu- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tips for Visitors
    Information for Visiting Public Entrances Hours for Visiting Public* Metro/Parking The Library occupies three buildings on Capitol The closest Metro Stations are Capitol South Hill. Most visitors first come to the historic Thomas Jefferson Building (Blue/Orange/Silver line—a 2 block walk) or Thomas Jefferson Building, located directly east 10 First Street S.E. Union Station (Red line—a ½ mile walk). of the U.S. Capitol Building. The Main Entrance Washington, DC 20540 is at the top of the Grand Staircase facing First Monday–Saturday The Library does not provide parking. Limited Street, SE. 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m. metered and 2-hour zoned parking is available 1st street SE, between Independence Avenue in the surrounding neighborhoods. Limited and East Capitol Street public parking options include Union Station. Accessibility The Library buildings are fully accessible with James Madison Memorial Building elevators to all levels. The ADA entrance for 101 Independence Ave SE Admissions and Ticketing visitors to the Jefferson Building is at the Monday–Saturday Admission to the Library is free and no tickets driveway level beneath the Grand Staircase. 8:30 a.m.–5:00 p.m. or reservations are required for admission. Wheelchairs are available on a first-come, first- Visitors are welcome to visit the Great Hall and served basis from the Jefferson Building John Adams Building exhibitions at their own pace using available Ground Floor Information Desk for use during 10 Second Street S.E. printed materials or to participate in a guided your visit. Braille brochures are available. Monday–Saturday tour (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise 2.7
    The Three-Fifths Compromise 2.7 The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes. The issue was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years, and to determine what percentage of the nation's direct tax burden the state would have to bear. The compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman. The Convention had unanimously accepted the principle that representation in the House of Representatives would be in proportion to the relative state populations. However, since slaves could not vote, non-slaves in slave states would thus have the benefit of increased representation in the House and the Electoral College. Delegates opposed to slavery proposed that only free inhabitants of each state be counted for apportionment purposes, while delegates supportive of slavery, on the other hand, opposed the proposal, wanting slaves to count in their actual numbers. A compromise which was finally agreed upon—of counting "all other persons" as only three-fifths of their actual numbers—reduced the representation of the slave states relative to the original proposals, but improved it over the Northern position.[1] An inducement for slave states to accept the Compromise was its tie to taxation in the same ratio, so that the burden of taxation on the slave states was also reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Access to Information in the United States Congress
    Draft of 5/27/2021 – FOR DISCUSSION Increasing Access to Information in the United States Congress Thomas M. Susman “When the FOIA was on the House floor, right before the vote, Members lined up before the bill’s manager, John Moss. Each in turn asked ‘John, is this going to apply to us?’ When Moss replied ‘Absolutely not,’ the Member responded: ‘Well, then I’ll vote for it.’”1 ---------- “If it’s good for the Executive branch agencies, why isn’t it good enough for the Congress?”2 By its express terms, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applies only to “agencies,” defined in the Administrative Procedure Act as “each authority of the Government of the United States . but does not include—(A) the Congress.”3 The “Final Report and Recommendations” of the 2018-2020 Freedom of Information Act Advisory Committee’s Report to the Archivist of the United States proposed: In the spirit of expanding the reach of FOIA, we believe that the next term of the Committee should give due consideration to the possibility of extending some aspects of FOIA to parts of the legislative and judicial branches.4 This memorandum reflects the conclusions following “due consideration” given to this issue, as to the legislative branch, by the Legislation Subcommittee (“Subcommittee”) of the 2020-2022 FOIA Advisory Committee. The Subcommittee’s consideration included a public presentation to the full Committee on March 3, 2021, from experts on access to both legislative and judicial branch records. Our proposal is that, pursuant to the Advisory Committee’s conclusion, the Archivist should recommend to Congress the following: Congress should adopt rules [or enact legislation] to establish procedures for effecting public access to legislative branch records in the possession of congressional support offices and agencies modeled after those procedures contained in the Freedom of Information Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Compromise in Response to the Virginia Plan, New Jersey Delegate William Paterson Presented an Alternative on June 15
    212-217US8P R U2C08S2 11/26/02 12:23 PM Page 212 TERMS & NAMES 2 Creating the Constitutional Creating the Convention James Madison ConstitutionConstitution Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Great Compromise MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW Three-Fifths Compromise The states sent delegates to a The Constitutional Convention convention to solve the problems of formed the plan of government that the Articles of Confederation. the United States still has today. ONE AMERICAN’S STORY On the afternoon of May 15, 1787, Edmund Randolph, the young governor of Virginia, arrived in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. The young nation faced violence and lawlessness, as Shays’s Rebellion had shown. And now delegates from throughout the states were coming to Philadelphia to discuss reforming the government. Randolph knew the serious task he and the other delegates were about to undertake. Early in the convention, Randolph rose to speak. He looked squarely at the delegates and reminded them of their grave responsibility. A VOICE FROM THE PAST Edmund Let us not be afraid to view with a steady eye the [dangers] Randolph (left) with which we are surrounded. Are we not on the eve and the other of [a civil] war, which is only to be prevented by the hopes delegates from this convention? gathered in the Edmund Randolph, quoted in Edmund Randolph: A Biography Pennsylvania State House (above) to discuss Over the next four months, the delegates debated how best to creating a new keep the United States from falling apart. In this section, you will read government for about the Convention of 1787 and the creation of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCLASSIFIED US Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc
    Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162980 Date: 09/26/2018 Re: Office of Civil Rights To: Cheryl Mills RELEASE IN PART 86 86 Subject: Re: Office of Civil Rights He could but I doubt he would. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162980 Date: 09/26/2018 Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162981 Date: 09/26/2018 Can I call Harold Koh and Eric Goosby? To: Cheryl Mills ...______ ____, RELEASE IN PART 86 B6 Subject: Can I call Harold Koh and Eric Goosby? I'll be home in ten minutes if you want to talk. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162981 Date: 09/26/2018 Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06162982 Date: 09/26/2018 Office of Civil Rights From: Cheryl Mills RELEASE IN PART 86 86 To: Hillary Clinton [email protected] Subject: Office of Civil Rights Before I mention to D as something perhaps worth exploring- do you think this is a role he can fulfill? Office of Civil Rights At the Department of State, diversity is not just aworthy cause: it is abusiness necessity. Diversity of experience and background helps Department employees in the work of diplomacy. The Secretary believes that diversity is extremely important in making the State Department an employer of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalizing Constitutional Moments? a Reflection on the Japanese Article 9 Debate
    University of New South Wales Law Research Series GLOBALIZING CONSTITUTIONAL MOMENTS? A REFLECTION ON THE JAPANESE ARTICLE 9 DEBATE ROSALIND DIXON AND GUY BALDWIN [2017] UNSWLRS 74 UNSW Law UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia E: [email protected] W: http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/research/faculty-publications AustLII: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/ SSRN: http://www.ssrn.com/link/UNSW-LEG.html GLOBALIZING CONSTITUTIONAL MOMENTS? A REFLECTION ON THE JAPANESE ARTICLE 9 DEBATE Rosalind Dixon* & Guy Baldwin** US scholars have developed a rich toolkit for analyzing informal, as well as formal, processes of constitutional change. A leading example is Bruce Ackerman’s theory of “constitutional moments”. Comparative constitutional scholars, in contrast, have given relatively little attention to the legitimacy of informal modes of constitutional change. This article contributes to filling this gap in our understanding of informal constitutional change outside the US, by analyzing recent attempts by Shinzo Abe’s LDP government informally to amend or “reinterpret” Japan’s pacifist Constitution. Attention to the Japanese experience in this context reveals superficial indications of an actual constitutional moment, but also a lack of true democratic support for such change. This, the article suggests, further helps reveal an important, though largely unstated, precondition for the application of Ackerman’s theory – i.e. that there must be meaningful competition between political parties, in the legislature and at national elections, before informal constitutional change can legitimately occur. Bruce Ackerman has famously suggested that the US Constitution can be amended by both formal and informal constitutional means.1 Basing his analysis on US history, Ackerman argues that several transformative constitutional changes have occurred outside the text of the Constitution, and the formal requirements for amendment under Article V.
    [Show full text]