Locally Developed Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Locally Developed Service Locally developed service Organisation Length of Local Authority Service Name of Has the service been Region delivering the Referral criteria service Links for further information Contact details for further information Area Type service evaluated? service offer South Tyneside North East Locally Evolve South Tyneside Parents who: Up to 18 No [email protected] developed Council Have had one or more children removed from their care months service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Blackburn with North Locally Blackburn with Parents who: Flexible No [email protected] Darwen West developed Darwen Borough Have had one or more children removed from their care service Council AND Are currently pregnant Rochdale North Locally NEST Rochdale Parents who: Have had one or more children 24 No [email protected] West developed Borough Council removed from their care within the last 2 years and months+ service EITHER Have no children currently in their care OR Are currently pregnant u Salford North Locally Strengthening Salford City Parents who: Have had one or more children 24 Yes, more information available View: Salford: Safeguarding Children News (August 2020) [email protected] West developed Families Council removed from their care within the last 2 years and months+ here service EITHER For information regarding the roll-out of Strengthening Families in Have no children currently in their care Greater Manchester please contact [email protected] OR Are currently pregnant u Sefton North Locally Step Together Venus Charity Women who: Up to 18 Yes, evaluation by Essex University View: Step Together | Venus Charity [email protected] West developed Have had one or more children removed from their care months service Stockport North Locally Comma Stockport Parents who: Flexible Yes, more information available View: ‘The Comma Project - Advice for professionals’ project [email protected] West developed Families Had one or more children removed from their care here leaflet here service AND Have no children currently in their care Tameside North Locally STARS Tameside Parents who have: Up to 24 No View: STARS Guide for Parents and STARS Guide for [email protected] West developed Metropolitan Had one or more children removed from their care months professionals project leaflet available here [email protected] service Borough Council AND Are currently pregnant under 12 weeks gestation AND Have no children currently in their care Kirklees Yorkshire Locally Mothers Living Women Centre Mothers who are living apart from their children Flexible Yes, more information available View: Women Centre - Mental health and wellbeing service [email protected] & Humber developed Apart from Kirklees here Tel: 01484 450866 service their Children Organisation Length of Local Authority Service Name of Has the service been Region delivering the Referral criteria service Links for further information Contact details for further information Area Type service evaluated? service offer Leeds Yorkshire Locally Futures Leeds City Council Young parents under 25 years who: Have had one or more children removed Up to 18 Yes - Internal evaluation, summary View: Futures - One minute guide [email protected] & Humber developed from their care in the last year months available on request service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Priority given to care experienc North Yorkshire Yorkshire Locally Inspiration for North Yorkshire Parents who: 24 No [email protected] & Humber developed Change County Council Have had one or more children removed from their care months+ service And Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Sheffield Yorkshire Locally Project 6 Women who Approx 9 [email protected] & Humber developed Have had one or more children removed from their care months service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Lincolnshire East Locally TIME Lincolnshire Parents who: Up to 18 Internal evaluation but not publicly [email protected] Midlands developed County Council Have had one or more children removed from their care months available [email protected] service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Birmingham West Locally Breaking the Birmingham Parents who: Flexible Yes, Original BtC Programme View: ‘Breaking the cycle’ project leaflet available here Joanne Rogers Midlands developed Cycle Children’s Trust Have had one or more children removed from their care evaluated when delivered by After Breaking the Cycle Team Manager service Adoption 07927 665329 Expanded programme not yet evaluated Dudley West Locally Reflect Barnardo’s Parents who: Flexible No local evaluation but Reflect View: Black Country Roots - Reflect Dudley [email protected] Midlands developed Have had one or more children removed from their care model in Gwent evaluated. service AND Are not currently pregnant Staffordshire West Locally Breathing Staffordshire Parents who: Flexible No [email protected] Midlands developed Spaces County Council Have had one or more children removed from their care service AND EITHER Have no children currently in their care OR Are pregnant under 20 weeks gestation Telford and Wrekin West Locally Changing Telford and Mothers who: Flexible No [email protected] Midlands developed Futures Wrekin Council Have had one or more children removed from their care service Walsall West Locally Daisy Project Walsall Council Parents who: Up to 12 No [email protected] Midlands developed Have had one or more children permanently removed from their care months service AND Are currently pregnant between 12 and 24 weeks gestation Warwickshire West Locally Different Warwickshire Parents who: 24 Yes, more information available View: ‘Warwickshire Different Futures Interim Report - May [email protected] Midlands developed Futures County Council Have had one or more children removed from their care months+ here 2020’ [email protected] service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant AND Are using long acting reversible contraception Cambridgeshire East of Locally Mpower Ormiston Women who: Flexible Early evaluation of Ipswich View: Ormiston Families - Working with communities [email protected] England developed (Fenland area Families Have had one or more children removed from their care Project by Essex University, more service only) information available here Norfolk East of Locally Mpower (Great Ormiston Women who: Flexible Early evaluation of Ipswich View: Ormiston Families - Working with communities [email protected] England developed Yarmouth, Families Have had one or more children removed from their care Project by Essex University, more service Norwich, Kings information available here Lyn areas only) Organisation Length of Local Authority Service Name of Has the service been Region delivering the Referral criteria service Links for further information Contact details for further information Area Type service evaluated? service offer Southend-on-Sea East of Locally Rise Southend-on-Sea Parents who have: Up to 18 Yes, ‘RISE Report - September 2018’ [email protected] England developed Borough Council Had one or more children removed from their care months project leaflet available here service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Suffolk East of Locally (1) Positive (1) Norfolk County (1) Parents who: 1) Flexible Early evaluation of Ipswich View: Suffolk County Council - Positive Choices service [email protected] England developed Choices Council Have had one more children removed from their care within the previous 2 years (2) Project by Essex University, more service (2) Mpower (2) Ormiston (2) Women who: Flexible information available here (Ipswich and families Have had one or more children removed from their care View: Ormiston Families - Working with communities [email protected] Lowestoft areas only) Hammersmith and London Locally Action for London Borough Parents who: Up to 18 No View: Action for Change - Best Practice Toolkit [email protected] Fulham developed Change of Hammersmith Have had one or more children removed from their care months View: Action For Change - Best Practice Tools e-newsletter service and Fulham Council Kensington and London Locally Action for Royal Borough of Parents who: Up to 18 No View: Action for Change - Best Practice Toolkit [email protected] Chelsea developed Change Kensington and Have had one or more children removed from their care months View: Action For Change - Best Practice Tools e-newsletter service Chelsea Council Lambeth London Locally Flourish Lambeth London Women who: Up to 18 No View: ‘Flourish Information Booklet for Women - March 2021’ [email protected] developed Borough Council Have had one or more children removed from their care months project leaflet available here service AND Have no children currently in their care AND Are not currently pregnant Westminster London Locally Action for Westminster City Parents who: Up to 18 No View: Action for Change - Best Practice Toolkit [email protected] developed Change Council Have had one or
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper 4: Deliverability
    Southend Central Area Action Plan TOPIC PAPER 4: DELIVERABILITY March 2017 SOUTHEND-ON-SEA BOROUGH COUNCIL SOUTHEND CENTRAL AREA ACTION PLAN (SCAAP) VIABILITY UPDATE NOTE - FEBRUARY 2017 1 Introduction 1.1 Southend-on-Sea Borough Council (‘the Council’) are due to submit the Southend Central Area Action Plan (‘SCAAP’) Revised Proposed Submission (November 2016) to the Secretary of State for Examination imminently. 1.2 The purpose of the SCAAP is to give more detailed consideration to how and where regeneration and growth can sustainably be accommodated in the Southend Central Area, including the Town Centre, Central Seafront Area and gateway neighbourhoods of Victoria and Sutton. In this regard the SCAAP contains proposals for ‘Policy Areas’ and ‘Opportunity Sites’ aimed at strengthening and transforming Southend Town Centre’s sub-regional role as a successful retail and commercial destination, cultural hub and educational centre of excellence, leisure and tourist attraction and an excellent place to live. We understand that there has been much public consultation on the issues and principles underlying the policies in the SCAAP which has helped inform the Revised Proposed Submission version. 1.3 The Council commissioned BNP Paribas Real Estate to prepare a Combined Policy Viability Study in 2013 (CPVS), which formed part of the evidence base informing the Council’s draft Development Management and SCAAP DPDs. The Development Management DPD was adopted in July 2015. This note provides an update on the market position within the Borough and an analysis of the impact this will have on viability. This note also provides an update as to the changes to policies which are considered to have a cost impact on development.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK COUNTRY EXECUTIVE JOINT COMMITTEE Access to Information Procedure Rules – General Exception Key Decisions Notified After Publication Deadline
    BLACK COUNTRY EXECUTIVE JOINT COMMITTEE Access to Information procedure rules – General Exception Key Decisions notified after publication deadline Project Name Key Decision to be considered (to provide adequate details for Contact Officer Date Item to Chair of relevant Overview and Scrutiny those both in and outside of the Council) be Committee informed considered Growth Hub - Grant Funding Approval for the Accountable Body for the Black Simon Neilson 24/06/20 Dudley Council Agreement Approval 2020/21 Country Growth Hub (Walsall Council) to [email protected] - Cllr Ray Burston – 11/06/20 proceed to a Grant Agreement, with the Black Country Consortium Ltd, to deliver the Black Sandwell Council Country Growth Hub Funding for 2020/21. - Cllr Laura Rollins – 15/06/20 Walsall Council - Cllr John Murray – 15/06/20 City of Wolverhampton Council - Cllr Paul Sweet – 10/06/20 Hub to Home Transport Approval for the Accountable Body for the Alan Lunt 25/09/19 Dudley Council Innovation Centre and Test Local Growth Deal programme (Walsall [email protected] - Cllr Nicola Richards – 28-8-19 Track Project: Very Light Rail Council) to proceed to enter into a Grant and Autonomous Agreement and/or other appropriate Stuart Everton Sandwell Council Technologies – Test Track documentation, with Dudley Council to [email protected] - Cllr Laura Rollins – 29-8-19 Project Grant Agreement deliver the Local Growth Deal funded elements ov.uk of the Very Light Rail Test Track Project. Walsall Council - Cllr Louise Harrison – 29-8-19 Notes that there is work currently ongoing with Dudley Council, the BC LEP and the City of Wolverhampton Council Accountable Body, to validate the available - Cllr Paul Sweet – 3-9-19 funds in the Black Country Enterprise Zone, to fund the next phases of the project which will include the Innovation Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Download – 102.39 KB
    OFFICIAL ADEPT South West Board Terms of reference (Updated March 2021) Background The Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and Transport (ADEPT) represents Place Directors from county, unitary and metropolitan authorities, along with Local Enterprise Partnerships and corporate partners drawn from key service sectors. ADEPT members are at the very heart of maximising sustainable growth in communities throughout the UK. We are delivering the projects that are key to unlocking broader economic success and creating more resilient communities, economies and infrastructure. The South West Board Remit The South West Board leads ADEPT’s understanding and response to strategic issues and policies in the South West of England. The Board understands that, while sometimes local authorities in the region have differing priorities, economic growth is a shared aspiration and often needs to be unlocked and fostered through joint partnership working. In all situations sustainable growth requires good quality planning, investment and infrastructure. The South West Board has a broad and diverse remit and provides the space for its Member organisations to respond to, influence and support each other in addressing and implementing strategic policies and issues that are of relevance to its area of focus. However regular items include the progress being made by the region’s subnational transport bodies; Western Gateway and Peninsula Transport, climate change and the environment, discussions with government departments and partner agencies on policy changes, consultations and place based funding, the challenges faced by local government, and the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Membership The Board’s membership is voluntary and is drawn from Directors and Heads of Service at member local authorities and Local Enterprise Partnership Chief Executives.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Accessibility Across UK Local Authorities
    Accessibility across UK Local Authorities Socitm and Sitemorse collaboration – supporting BetterConnected Introduction Digital accessibility regulation is challenging to manage and is negatively impacting those for whom the rules should be assisting. Public sector bodies must deal with accessibility, against a timetable. Now with a specific timeline in relation to the public sector achieving accessibility compliance for their websites, we have summarised our Q3 / 2019 results, reporting the position across the sector. For over 10 years Sitemorse have been in partnership with Socitm, working on numerous initiatives including BetterConnected. Sept. 29th 2019 | Ver. 1.9 | Release | © Sitemorse In Summary. For the Sitemorse 2019 Q3 UK Local Government INDEX we assessed over 400 authority websites for adherence to WCAG 2.1. The INDEX was compiled 37% following some 250 million tests, checks and measures across nearly 820,000 URLs. 17% Comparing the Q3 to the Q2 results; 49 improved, 44 dropped, with the balance remaining the same. Three Local Authorities achieved a score of 10 (out of 10) for accessibility. It’s important to note that the INDEX covers the main website of each authority. The law applies to all websites operated, directly or on behalf of the authority. 46% The target score is 7.7 out of 10. • Pages passing accessibility level A: 87.11% • Pages passing accessibility level AA: 12.2% • Of the 3,550 PDF’s 56.4% PDF’s passed the accessibility tests. Score 10 - 7 Score 5 - 6 Score 1 - 4 It is important to note that this score is for automated tests; there are still manual tests that need to be performed however, a score of 10 demonstrates a thorough understanding of what needs to be done and it is highly likely that the manual tests will pass too.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopt Thames Valley 2020-2021 Statement of Purpose 2018-19
    Statement of Purpose Adopt Thames Valley 2020-2021 Statement of Purpose 2018-19 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Principles and Values Statement 3. Aims and Objectives 4. Responsible Officers 5. Organisational Structure of Adopt Thames Valley 6. Roles and Responsibilities 7. Adopt Thames Valley Adoption Panel 8. Systems for the Monitoring, Quality Assurance and Evaluation of Services 9. Complaints and Compliments 10. Appendices Appendix A – Values Statement Appendix B – Schedule of Responsibilities Appendix C – Adopt Thames Valley Staffing Structure Appendix D – Adopt Thames Valley Administrative Structure Appendix E – Our Vision - 2 - 1. Introduction Adopt Thames Valley (ATV) is a Regional Adoption Agency, established in December 2017, with delegated responsibility for discharging certain adoption functions of Bracknell Forest Council, Oxfordshire County Council, Reading Council (Brighter Futures for Children), Royal Borough of Windsor (Achieving for Children) and Maidenhead, Swindon Council, West Berkshire Council and Wokingham Council. Adopt Thames Valley also works in partnership with PACT. This statement of purpose has been written in accordance with the Adoption & Children Act 2002 and associated Regulations, and the Adoption Statutory Guidance 2013. It fulfils the requirements of Regulations 2 and 4 of the Local Authority Adoption Service (England) Regulations 2003; Regulations 3 and 24B and Regulations 4 and 24 C of the Voluntary Adoption Agencies and the Adoption Agencies (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2003; and of Regulations
    [Show full text]
  • Building Control Regularisation Form 2021
    Building Control Wessex Group Regularisation Application Form Wessex Group The Building Act 1984 - The Building Regulations 2010 Please use BLOCK CAPITALS or TYPE This form can only be used for works commenced after 11th November 1985 1 OWNERS DETAILS: Name: Address: Postcode: Tel: Email: 2 AGENTS DETAILS: Name: Address: Postcode: Tel: Email: 3 LOCATION OF BUILDING TO WHICH WORK RELATES: (attach site plan if building was extended or new build) 4 DESCRIPTION OF WORKS CARRIED OUT: (Please provide plans indicating work carried out) 5 USE OF BUILDING: 1. Previous Use: 2. Current Use: 6 CHARGES: Estimated Cost of Works Floor Area (New Build/Extension) m2 Charge Enclosed See charges information overleaf. Full details on Building Regulation charges are contained within the Building (Local Authority) Charges Regulations 2010. 7 OTHER INFORMATION: 1. Have you applied for Planning Permission and/or Listed Building Conservation Area Consent: Yes No If yes, please provide application reference number(s), If no, please contact your local planning office for advice. 8 DATE WORKS CARRIED OUT: (If not known give approximate date): 9 STATEMENT: STATEMENT: This notice is given in relation to the building work as described, is submitted in accordance with Regulation 21 (3) and is accompanied by a site plan and the appropriate charge I / We understand that further details / information may be required by the Local Authority. Name: Signature: Date: REGULARISATION CHARGES (Valid from 1st April 2021) TABLE A - NEW DWELLINGS (including flats up to three storeys)
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB Members (July 2021)
    Local Authority / Combined Authority / STB members (July 2021) 1. Barnet (London Borough) 24. Durham County Council 50. E Northants Council 73. Sunderland City Council 2. Bath & NE Somerset Council 25. East Riding of Yorkshire 51. N. Northants Council 74. Surrey County Council 3. Bedford Borough Council Council 52. Northumberland County 75. Swindon Borough Council 4. Birmingham City Council 26. East Sussex County Council Council 76. Telford & Wrekin Council 5. Bolton Council 27. Essex County Council 53. Nottinghamshire County 77. Torbay Council 6. Bournemouth Christchurch & 28. Gloucestershire County Council 78. Wakefield Metropolitan Poole Council Council 54. Oxfordshire County Council District Council 7. Bracknell Forest Council 29. Hampshire County Council 55. Peterborough City Council 79. Walsall Council 8. Brighton & Hove City Council 30. Herefordshire Council 56. Plymouth City Council 80. Warrington Borough Council 9. Buckinghamshire Council 31. Hertfordshire County Council 57. Portsmouth City Council 81. Warwickshire County Council 10. Cambridgeshire County 32. Hull City Council 58. Reading Borough Council 82. West Berkshire Council Council 33. Isle of Man 59. Rochdale Borough Council 83. West Sussex County Council 11. Central Bedfordshire Council 34. Kent County Council 60. Rutland County Council 84. Wigan Council 12. Cheshire East Council 35. Kirklees Council 61. Salford City Council 85. Wiltshire Council 13. Cheshire West & Chester 36. Lancashire County Council 62. Sandwell Borough Council 86. Wokingham Borough Council Council 37. Leeds City Council 63. Sheffield City Council 14. City of Wolverhampton 38. Leicestershire County Council 64. Shropshire Council Combined Authorities Council 39. Lincolnshire County Council 65. Slough Borough Council • West of England Combined 15. City of York Council 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Walsall Council Walsall Market Location Review and Evidence Base
    Walsall Council Walsall Market Location review and evidence base ARP-WAL-EVB Planning | 10 February 2014 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 232986 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd The Arup Campus Blythe Gate Blythe Valley Park Solihull B90 8AE United Kingdom www.arup.com Walsall Council Walsall Market Location review and evidence base Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this report 1 1.2 Arup’s commission 1 2 Key considerations 2 3 Previously considered market locations 4 3.1 Overview 4 3.2 Location requirements 5 3.3 The preferred location 5 4 Review of existing market and preferred location 6 4.1 Economic context 6 4.2 Public realm 7 4.3 Accessibility 11 4.4 Recognising best practice 11 4.5 Exclusion Zone 22 4.6 Viability 23 4.7 Civil works and infrastructure 27 4.8 Planning and regeneration context 29 5 Revised market location criteria 33 6 Potential market locations 35 6.1 Identifying potential market locations 35 6.2 Updated locations 35 7 Assessment of potential market locations 38 7.1 Assessment of locations 38 7.2 Assessment summary table 41 7.3 Preferred options 45 7.4 Recommendation 45 Tables Table 1: Soft market discussions summary Table 2: Popup stall income and expenditure Table 3: Summary of relevant local planning policy Table 4: Location criteria ARP-WAL-EVB | Planning | 10 February 2014 J:\232000\232986-00\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-05 REPORTS\PLANNING\SUPPORTING PLANNING DOCUMENTS\EVIDENCE BASE REPORT\LOCATION REVIEW AND EVIDENCE BASE FINAL.DOCX Walsall Council Walsall Market Location review and evidence base Table 5: Potential locations assessment summary Figures Figure 1: Locations considered by GVA study.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Lighting As an Asset; Smart Cities and Infrastructure Developments ADEPTE ASSOCIATION of DIRECTORS of ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING and TRANSPORT
    ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT DAVE JOHNSON ADEPT Street Lighting Group chair ADEPT Engineering Board member UKLB member TfL Contracts Development Manager ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT • Financial impact of converting to LED • Use of Central Management Systems to profile lighting levels • Street Lighting as an Asset; Smart Cities and Infrastructure Developments ADEPTE ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY, PLANNING AND TRANSPORT Representing directors from county, unitary and metropolitan authorities, & Local Enterprise Partnerships. Maximising sustainable community growth across the UK. Delivering projects to unlock economic success and create resilient communities, economies and infrastructure. http://www.adeptnet.org.uk ADEPTE SOCIETY OF CHIEF OFFICERS OF CSS Wales TRANSPORTATION IN SCOTLAND ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT ADEPTE SOCIETY OF CHIEF OFFICERS OF CSS Wales TRANSPORTATION IN SCOTLAND ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY PLANNING AND TRANSPORT Bedford Borough Council Gloucestershire County Council Peterborough City Council Blackburn with Darwen Council Hampshire County Council Plymouth County Council Bournemouth Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Portsmouth City Council Bristol City Council Hull City Council Solihull MBC Buckinghamshire County Council Kent County Council Somerset County
    [Show full text]
  • Thousands of Businesses Across England Facing Further Job Losses Or Bankruptcy Due to Local Authorities Failing to Pay up to £1.4Bn of Emergency COVID-19 Grants
    PRESS RELEASE Thousands of businesses across England facing further job losses or bankruptcy due to local authorities failing to pay up to £1.4bn of emergency COVID-19 grants Freedom of Information Request by the Events Industry Alliance to Local Authorities across England has shown that an estimated 87 per cent of the £1.6bn Additional Restrictions Grant (ARG) funds announced by the UK Government have yet to be paid out to companies, despite the scheme being launched four months ago The ARG scheme was announced in October to help businesses forced to close due to COVID-19 restrictions, including those in the events, exhibitions and hospitality sectors Businesses closed by COVID-19 restrictions face being forced into making further job cuts or bankruptcy due to local council delays London, 10 February 2021, The Events Industry Alliance (EIA), which represents the UK’s event organisers, venues, and suppliers, can today reveal that an estimated £1.4bn of Additional Restrictions Grants (ARG) announced by the UK Government on 31 October, has not yet been paid by local authorities in England to businesses closed by the Covid-19 pandemic. The ARG, which could be worth up to £3,000 per month per company, provides funding for local authorities to support businesses that have been forced to close because of national COVID-19 restrictions. These include companies in the retail, hospitality, and leisure sectors, as well as events and exhibitions businesses. The scheme was announced by the UK Government on 31st October 2020 with an initial £1bn funding allocation, with a further £594m issued in early January 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • 2 September 2013 Organisational Improvement and Development
    To: Members of the Organisational Improvement Professor Steven Broomhead and Development Policy Committee Interim Chief Executive Councillors: Town Hall Cllr J Kerr-Brown - Chair Sankey Street Cllr L Murphy - Deputy Chair Warrington Cllrs P Kennedy, L Ladbury, D Price, P Walker WA1 1UH and T Williams, S Wright, T Wood 2 September 2013 Organisational Improvement and Development Policy Committee Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 6.30pm Council Chamber, Town Hall, Sankey Street, Warrington, WA1 1UH Agenda prepared by Louise Murtagh, Democratic Services Officer – Telephone: (01925) 442111 Fax: (01925) 656278 E-mail: [email protected] A G E N D A Part 1 Items during the consideration of which the meeting is expected to be open to members of the public (including the press) subject to any statutory right of exclusion. Item Page Number 1. Apologies for Absence To record any apologies received. 2. Code of Conduct - Declarations of Interest Relevant Authorities (Disclosable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations 2012 Members are reminded of their responsibility to declare any disclosable pecuniary or non-pecuniary interest which they have in any item of business on the agenda no later than when the item is reached. Item Page Number 3. Minutes 1 To confirm the Minutes of the meeting of 26 June 2013 4. Residents’ Survey Briefing note and presentation to the Committee by the Assistant Director Partnerships and Performance 5. Customer Service Strategy Briefing note to the Committee by the Assistant Director Partnerships and Performance 6. Living Wage To Follow Report of the Chair of the Organisational Improvement and Development Policy Committee 7. Co-operative Councils & Services and Mutual Councils Report of the Chair of the Organisational Improvement and Development Policy Committee 8.
    [Show full text]