DOCSLIB.ORG

URBAN INTERSECTION DESIGN GUIDE: VOLUME 1 – September 2004 GUIDELINES Resubmitted: February 2005 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
URBAN INTERSECTION DESIGN GUIDE: VOLUME 1 – September 2004 GUIDELINES Resubmitted: February 2005 6 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4365-P2 Vol. 1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date URBAN INTERSECTION DESIGN GUIDE: VOLUME 1 – September 2004 GUIDELINES Resubmitted: February 2005 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kay Fitzpatrick, Mark D. Wooldridge, and Joseph D. Blaschke Product 0-4365-P2 Vol. 1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-4365 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Product Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Urban Intersection Design Guidance URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-4365-P2Combined.pdf 16. Abstract Intersections are an important part of a highway facility because the efficiency, safety, speed, cost of operation, and capacity of the facility depend on their design to a great extent. Each intersection involves through- or cross-traffic movements on one or more of the highways and may involve turning movements between these highways. Such movements may be facilitated by various geometric designs and traffic controls, depending on the type of intersection. The main objective of intersection design is to facilitate the convenience, comfort, and safety of people traversing the intersection while enhancing the efficient movement of motor vehicles, buses, trucks, bicycles, and pedestrians. In order to design intersections that are both functional and effective, designers need current information regarding intersection design that is easily accessible and in a user-friendly format. The prime objective of the Texas Department of Transportation Project 0-4365 is to produce this reference document, the Urban Intersection Design Guide, to provide this information. This document is presented in two volumes: • Volume 1 – Guidelines and • Volume 2 – Applications. This project is designed to provide TxDOT and other interested parties with useful and practical information on operations and design for intersections. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Urban Intersections, Design Guidelines, Intersection Design Examples 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price 382 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized URBAN INTERSECTION DESIGN GUIDE: VOLUME 1 – GUIDELINES by Kay Fitzpatrick, Ph.D., P.E. Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Mark D. Wooldridge, P.E. formerly Associate Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute currently Area Engineer Texas Department of Transportation and Joseph D. Blaschke, D. Eng., P.E. President Transportation Research Analysts Report 0-4365-P2 Vol. 1 Project 0-4365 Project Title: Urban Intersection Design Guidance Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration September 2004 Resubmitted: February 2005 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The engineer in charge was Kay Fitzpatrick, P.E. (TX-86762). v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was conducted in cooperation with TxDOT and FHWA. The authors thank the members of TxDOT’s Project Monitoring Committee: Rick Collins, P.E., Project Coordinator, TxDOT, Traffic Operations Division Elizabeth Hilton, P.E., Project Director, TxDOT, Design Division John Terry, P.E., Project Advisor, TxDOT, Ft. Worth District Clay Smith, P.E., Project Advisor, TxDOT, San Antonio District Duane Browning, P.E., Project Advisor, TxDOT, Beaumont District Larry Colclasure, P.E., Project Advisor, TxDOT, Waco District Jim Cline, P.E., Project Advisor, City of Irving Special thanks go to Elizabeth Hilton for her guidance on the project, Angelia Parham for work on the earlier versions of the document, and Ivan Lorenz and Denise Robledo for patiently making the numerous graphics and typing changes. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Intersection Function.................................................................................................. 1-1 Section 1: Intersection Planning & Development ................................................................ 1-3 Overview.......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Design Considerations and Objectives............................................................................................. 1-3 The Intersection Development Process ............................................................................................1-5 Policy and Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 1-6 Design Exceptions, Variances, and Waivers.................................................................................... 1-7 Ultimate Design................................................................................................................................ 1-7 Arterial to Arterial Intersection Design............................................................................................ 1-8 Section 2: Types of Intersections........................................................................................ 1-13 Overview........................................................................................................................................ 1-13 Types of Intersections .................................................................................................................... 1-13 Innovative Designs......................................................................................................................... 1-16 Section 3: Components of an Intersection.......................................................................... 1-17 Overview........................................................................................................................................ 1-17 Principles of Intersection Design.................................................................................................... 1-17 Right-of-Way Needs ...................................................................................................................... 1-17 Right-of-Way Acquisition.............................................................................................................. 1-18 Intersection Area ............................................................................................................................ 1-18 Section 4: Utility Accommodation ..................................................................................... 1-21 Overview........................................................................................................................................ 1-21 Growing Demand for Utility Accommodation............................................................................... 1-21 Alternative Installation Methods .................................................................................................... 1-22 Subsurface Utility Engineering ...................................................................................................... 1-22 Inclusion of Utility Relocation in Construction Contract............................................................... 1-22 Potential Impacts on Intersection Design ....................................................................................... 1-22 Section 5: References ......................................................................................................... 1-25 Chapter 2: Design Control and Criteria ....................................................................................... 2-1 Section 1: Modes of Travel................................................................................................... 2-3 Overview.......................................................................................................................................... 2-3 Motorized Vehicles .......................................................................................................................... 2-3 Transit and Light Rail....................................................................................................................... 2-5 Bicycles............................................................................................................................................ 2-7 Pedestrians........................................................................................................................................ 2-7 Section 2: Users .................................................................................................................... 2-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Manual on Uniform Traffic
    MManualanual onon UUniformniform TTrafficraffic CControlontrol DDevicesevices forfor StreetsStreets andand HighwaysHighways U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for Streets and Highways Control Devices Manual on Uniform Traffic Dotted line indicates edge of binder spine. MM UU TT CC DD U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration MManualanual onon UUniformniform TTrafficraffic CControlontrol DDevicesevices forfor StreetsStreets andand HighwaysHighways U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 2003 Edition Page i The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is approved by the Federal Highway Administrator as the National Standard in accordance with Title 23 U.S. Code, Sections 109(d), 114(a), 217, 315, and 402(a), 23 CFR 655, and 49 CFR 1.48(b)(8), 1.48(b)(33), and 1.48(c)(2). Addresses for Publications Referenced in the MUTCD American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, DC 20001 www.transportation.org American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) 8201 Corporate Drive, Suite 1125 Landover, MD 20785-2230 www.arema.org Federal Highway Administration Report Center Facsimile number: 301.577.1421 [email protected] Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) 120 Wall Street, Floor 17 New York, NY 10005 www.iesna.org Institute of Makers of Explosives 1120 19th Street, NW, Suite 310 Washington, DC 20036-3605 www.ime.org Institute of Transportation Engineers
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Road Narrowings on Cyclists
    The effect of road narrowings on cyclists Prepared for Charging and Local Transport Division, Department for Transport A Gibbard, S Reid, J Mitchell, B Lawton, E Brown and H Harper TRL Report TRL621 First Published 2004 ISSN 0968-4107 Copyright TRL Limited 2004. This report has been produced by TRL Limited, under/as part of a contract placed by the Department for Transport. Any views expressed in it are not necessarily those of the Department. This report focuses on highway infrastructure as installed by a highway authority. Some illustrations may depict non- prescribed and unauthorised signing and road markings, which may be unlawful. Unless specifically referred to and explained in the report, the inclusion of non-standard signing in illustrations does not imply endorsement of its use by the Department for Transport. All prescribed signs are set out in Regulations (the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions and the Pedestrian Crossings Regulations) made under the provisions of the Road Traffic Regulation Act and published by the Stationery Office. TRL is committed to optimising energy efficiency, reducing waste and promoting recycling and re-use. In support of these environmental goals, this report has been printed on recycled paper, comprising 100% post-consumer waste, manufactured using a TCF (totally chlorine free) process. ii CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Study objectives 3 2 Current guidance 3 3 Consultation exercise 5 3.1 Consultation results 5 4 Questionnaire survey 7 4.1 Survey results 8 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Calming Fact Sheets May 2018 Update Speed Table/Raised Crosswalks
    Traffic Calming Fact Sheets May 2018 Update Speed Table/Raised Crosswalks Description: • Long, raised speed humps with a flat section in the middle and ramps on the ends; sometimes constructed with brick or other textured materials on the flat section • If placed at a pedestrian crossing, it is referred to as a raised crosswalk • If placed only in one direction on a road, it is called an offset speed table Applications: • Appropriate for local and collector streets; mid-block or at intersections, with/without crosswalks • Can be used on a one-lane one-way or two-lane two-way street • Not appropriate for roads with 85th percentile speeds of 45 mph or more • Typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top or within limits of ramps • Work well in combination with textured crosswalks, curb extensions, and curb radius reductions • Can be applied both with and without sidewalks or dedicated bicycle facilities • Typically installed along closed-section roads (i.e. curb and gutter) but feasible on open section (Source: Google Maps, Boulder, Colorado) (Source: Delaware Department of Transportation) ITE/FHWA Traffic Calming EPrimer: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/traffic_calm.cfm Design/Installation Issues: • ITE recommended practice – “Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps” • Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (reported as high as 6 inches) • Ramps are typically 6 feet long (reported up to 10 feet long) and are either parabolic or linear • Careful design is needed for drainage
    [Show full text]
  • SIMULATION of DIFFERENT INTERSECTION DESIGN for IMPROVING TRAFFIC FLOW with FACTORS CONSIDERING LOCATION, POPULATION and DRIVER EXPECTANCY Sourabh Kumar Singh Dr
    Science, Technology and Development ISSN : 0950-0707 SIMULATION OF DIFFERENT INTERSECTION DESIGN FOR IMPROVING TRAFFIC FLOW WITH FACTORS CONSIDERING LOCATION, POPULATION AND DRIVER EXPECTANCY Sourabh Kumar Singh Dr. Anil kunte Associate Professor, Research Scholar, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Department of Civil Department of Civil Engineering Engineering, Shri JJT Engineering, Shri JJT Noida International University University University Dr. Paritosh Srivastava Abstract: In today’s economic growth the vehicular traffic is increasing day by day, which leads to failure of intersections before their time period. To increase the efficiency of these failed intersections the engineers added lanes to the existing major and minor roads, but this method do not give results which it used to deliver in the past, hence other methods were adopted. So to increase the efficiency and fulfil the criteria for successful intersection ,to cape with it several intersection are designed which are unconventional in nature like jug handle, bow tie, continuous flow intersection and median u turn which are very effective in increasing green time on highway and minor roads. The software used in this study is Auto- cad for planning and drawing purpose which can be used in sim-traffic software which will be used for simulation purpose of the traffic flow on different designs of intersections. The factors which are considered in this study are -location of town centre, population of the zone and driver expectancy. The final conclusion of this study is that continuous flow intersection provides the best results when the traffic is increased. The construction cost is least in median u turn and giving maximum result than all other intersections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gibraltar Highway Code
    P ! CONTENTS Introduction Rules for pedestrians 3 Rules for users of powered wheelchairs and mobility scooters 10 Rules about animals 12 Rules for cyclists 13 Rules for motorcyclists 17 Rules for drivers and motorcyclists 19 General rules, techniques and advice for all drivers and riders 25 Road users requiring extra care 60 Driving in adverse weather conditions 66 Waiting and parking 70 Motorways 74 Breakdowns and incidents 79 Road works, level crossings and tramways 85 Light signals controlling traffic 92 Signals by authorised persons 93 Signals to other road users 94 Traffic signs 96 Road markings 105 Vehicle markings 109 Annexes 1. You and your bicycle 112 2. Vehicle maintenance and safety 113 3. Vehicle security 116 4. First aid on the road 116 5. Safety code for new drivers 119 1 Introduction This Highway Code applies to Gibraltar. However it also focuses on Traffic Signs and Road Situations outside Gibraltar, that as a driver you will come across most often. The most vulnerable road users are pedestrians, particularly children, older or disabled people, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders. It is important that all road users are aware of The Code and are considerate towards each other. This applies to pedestrians as much as to drivers and riders. Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/ MUST NOT’.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Glastonbury Bid No. Gl-2020-07
    TOWN OF GLASTONBURY BID NO. GL-2020-07 MAIN STREET RAISED TRAFFIC ISLAND ADDENDUM NO. 1 SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 BID DUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 11:00 A.M. The attention of bidders submitting proposals for the above-referenced project is called to the following Addendum to the specifications. The items set forth herein, whether of omission, addition, substitution or other change, are all to be included in and form a part of the proposed Contract Documents for the work. Bidders shall acknowledge this Addendum in the Bid Proposal by inserting its number on Page BP-1. Make the following modifications to the Contract Documents: BID PROPOSAL FORM: The bid proposal form is hereby replaced with the attached. ALL BIDDERS MUST USE THE REVISED BID PROPOSAL FORM. CONSTRUCTION PLANS: Sheets 1 of the plan set titled “PLAN DEPICTING PROPOSED TRAFFIC ISLAND IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AND MAIN STREET AND HEBRON AVENUE, GLASTONBURY CONNECTICUT” is hereby replaced with the attached plan. Changes shown on Sheet 1 include notes depicting removal and resetting of existing brick pavers in the vicinity of the existing town-owned locus tree which is to be completed as described in the special provision listed below. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: The following Special Provisions are hereby added to the contract: ITEM 0992093A REMOVE AND RESET BRICK PAVERS This Addendum Contains 6 Pages including the above text and 1 Plan Sheet. MAIN STREET RAISED TRAFFIC ISLAND ADDENDUM 1 BID PROPOSAL – REVISED BID #GL-2020-07 TOWN OF GLASTONBURY * 2155 MAIN STREET * GLASTONURY * CT BID / PROPOSAL NO: GL-2020-07 DATE DUE: September 19, 2019 DATE ADVERTISED: September 6, 2019 TIME DUE: 11:00 AM NAME OF PROJECT: Main Street Raised Traffic Island In compliance with this Invitation to Bid, the Bidder hereby proposes to provide goods and/or services as per this solicitation in strict accordance with the Bid Documents, within the time set forth therein, and at the prices submitted with their bid response.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Network Plan Middleton, WI
    Report Transportation Network Plan City of Middleton, WI December 2006 Report for City of Middleton, Wisconsin Transportation Network Plan Prepared by: Traffic Associates LLC and STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC.® 910 West Wingra Drive Madison, WI 53715 www.strand.com December 2006 Approved by Middleton City Council November 21, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. or Following SECTION 1–INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.01 Overview.................................................................................................... 1-1 1.02 Executive Summary................................................................................... 1-3 SECTION 2–EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM 2.01 Existing Transportation System................................................................. 2-1 2.02 Traffic Data Collection................................................................................ 2-14 2.03 Existing Conditions Modeling..................................................................... 2-16 SECTION 3–FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.01 Future Traffic Forecasting.......................................................................... 3-1 3.02 Future Conditions Traffic Operations Modeling ......................................... 3-4 3.03 Prioritization of Future Motor Vehicle Needs ............................................. 3-6 SECTION 4–SOLUTION TYPES 4.01 Transportation Solutions............................................................................ 4-1 4.02 Traffic Management Perspective ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Expressway Intersection Synthesis of Practice and Crash Analysis
    RURAL EXPRESSWAY INTERSECTION SYNTHESIS OF PRACTICE AND CRASH ANALYSIS Sponsored by the Iowa Department of Transportation (CTRE Project 03-157) Final Report October 2004 Disclaimer Notice The opinions, fi ndings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Iowa Department of Transportation. The sponsor(s) assume no liability for the contents or use of the information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. The sponsor(s) do not endorse products or manufacturers. About CTRE/ISU The mission of the Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) at Iowa State Uni- versity is to develop and implement innovative methods, materials, and technologies for improv- ing transportation effi ciency, safety, and reliability while improving the learning environment of students, faculty, and staff in transportation-related fi elds. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. CTRE Project 03-157 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Rural Expressway Intersection Synthesis of Practice and Crash Analysis October 2004 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. T. H. Maze, Neal R. Hawkins, and Garrett Burchett 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University 11. Contract or Grant No. 2901 South Loop Drive, Suite 3100 Ames, IA 50010-8634 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Iowa Department of Transportation Final Report 800 Lincoln Way 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Ames, IA 50010 15.
    [Show full text]
  • People Transport Vehicles
    PEOPLE TRANSPORT VEHICLES Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) is a $14 billion global business driven by a purpose to advance the quality of life by creating and sustaining safe, comfortable and efficient environments in commercial, residential and industrial markets. Our people and our market-leading brands, including Club Car®, Ingersoll Rand®, Thermo King® and Trane®, are committed to helping meet growing, critical needs for clean and comfortable air, secure homes and buildings, safe and fresh food, energy efficiency and sustainable business practices around the world. Club Car Ingersoll Rand Alma Court Building Lenneke Marelaan,6 BE-1932 Sint-Stevens-Woluwe Belgium +32 2 746 1200 [email protected] Visit our website! Its good to be green! You have a long list of tasks to do every day, and you need a reliable work partner. You’ll find one in Club Car’s line of transportation and utility vehicles. Our cars help you move those ever-growing lists of tasks from the to-do list to the job-well-done list. Although you may have 1000 jobs, you need only one Club Car to help you complete them all. A WARRANTY AS RELIABLE AS OUR VEHICLES. Club Car’s worldwide dealer network provides quality service and prompt support for your vehicles. Our vehicles are backed by the industry’s best 2-year limited warranty. Our batteries are backed by a 4-year warranty. Our warranties represent our promise that you’ll enjoy worry-free performance when you choose Club Car. Job 98: for the shrewd surveyor. Work crews appreciate the rugged durability of our Transporter 4 and the ability to bring their gear with them on the job.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Streets Safe
    About WalkBoston WalkBoston plays an important role ensuring walker- CHICANE TREES BIKE friendly/safe designs and has an impressive record LANES of getting cities, towns, state agencies, developers, RAISED institutions, and elected officials to provide for the CROSSWALK needs of walkers. Every additional member helps our message be heard. Join online at walkboston.org. We work to transform communities into more walkable CURB places and reintroduce people to walking as a con- EXTENSION venient, healthy and low-cost transportation choice. People who depend on walking most: lower income, elders, children, people with disabilities, and transit PARKED users especially benefit from our advocacy. CARS SPEED How we can help you CUSHION • Advise on walking improvements for your community. MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK • Provide guidance, moral support, technical assistance. making • Give a variety of presentations on pedestrian design and advocacy. Speed Kills: Small-scale fixes go a long way to slow traffic • Help set up advocacy groups and strengthen them. • Demonstrate how these techniques are working streets The human costs and economic consequences of The tools can be small in scale, relatively inexpensive, across Massachusetts and elsewhere. speed-related crashes are immense. In 2007, about and are easily tested and evaluated. Streets can be 31 percent of all fatal crashes were speeding-related, made safer by putting them on a “road diet,” reducing safe resulting in 13,420 fatalities. In Massachusetts, 15 to speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. Techniques Thanks to our supporters 20 percent of all road fatality victims are pedestrians. include signage, pavement devices and paint. Physically Nationwide, the economic cost to society of speed- or visually narrowing a standard width lane by 1 foot Striders ing-related crashes is estimated to be $40.4 billion slows cars by 7 miles per hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelsea Champions League Penalty Shootout
    Chelsea Champions League Penalty Shootout Billie usually foretaste heinously or cultivate roguishly when contradictive Friedrick buncos ne'er and banally. Paludal Hersh never premiere so anyplace or unrealize any paragoge intemperately. Shriveled Abdulkarim grounds, his farceuses unman canoes invariably. There is one penalty shootout, however, that actually made me laugh. After Mane scored, Liverpool nearly followed up with a second as Fabinho fired just wide, then Jordan Henderson forced a save from Kepa Arrizabalaga. Luckily, I could do some movements. Premier League play without conceding a goal. Robben with another cross to Mueller identical from before. Drogba also holds the record for most goals scored at the new Wembley Stadium with eight. Of course, you make saves as a goalkeeper, play the ball from the back, catch a corner. Too many images selected. There is no content available yet for your selection. Sorry, images are not available. Next up was Frank Lampard and, of course, he scored with a powerful hit. Extra small: Most smartphones. Preview: St Mirren vs. Find general information on life, culture and travel in China through our news and special reports or find business partners through our online Business Directory. About two thirds of the voters decided in favor of the proposition. FC Bayern Muenchen München vs. Frank Lampard of Chelsea celebrates scoring the opening goal from the penalty spot with teammate Didier Drogba during the Barclays Premier League. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Eintracht Frankfurt on Thursday. Their second penalty was more successful, but hardly signalled confidence from the spot, it all looked like Burghausen left their heart on the pitch and had nothing to give anymore.
    [Show full text]
  • Median U-Turn Intersections Cost
    System Modification Innovative Intersections MEDIAN U-TURN INTERSECTIONS COST TIME MODERATE STATE MINOR STREET MINOR STREET O REGI NAL IMPACT LOCAL RID OR OR MAJOR STREET MAJOR STREET C PT HO HURDES MAJOR STREET MOVEMENTS MINOR STREET MOVEMENTS CITSTATE RIHT-O-A PUIC ACCEPTANCE More Information: tti.tamu.edu/policy/how-to-fix-congestion SUCCESS STORIES Description How Will This Help? Plano, Texas. In 2011, the City Median U-turn intersections (also called • Costs less and is faster to of Plano installed the state’s only a thruturn or Michigan left) guide all traf- deploy than other innovative median U-turn intersection at fic, except left-turning vehicles, through intersection designs. Legacy Drive and Preston Road. the main intersection. Left-turning vehi- • Simplifies the traffic signal cles turn through U-turn openings in the The intersection timings for the intersection and dramatically improved median beyond the main intersection. whole corridor by eliminating the congestion by reducing Eliminating the left turn at the main need for a left-turn arrow. intersection wait intersection simplifies signal timings and times by 65%. provides more green time and less con- • Increases safety at the gestion to the major direction. intersection by eliminating traffic However, the design conflicts caused by left turns. was abandoned in 2014 Median U-turn intersections are similar due to a lack of public to superstreets but differ in that medi- Implementation Issues understanding and an U-turns allow minor street traffic to This intersection design can require acceptance. pass straight through the intersection. additional right-of-way to accommodate Superstreet intersections require all the U-turn turning radius in the median.
    [Show full text]