DOCSLIB.ORG

Representing the Severan Empresses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Representing the Severan Empresses REPRESENTING THE SEVERAN EMPRESSES Women as Rhetorical Devices in the Narratives of Roman Imperial Historiography Reinier Langerak Student number: 4163176 RMA Ancient, Medieval, and Renaissance Studies Utrecht University Supervisor: Dr. Saskia Stevens Second Reader: Dr. Rolf Strootman A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts September 2020 Abstract This thesis examines the narrative and rhetorical functions of the Severan empresses – Julia Domna, Julia Maesa, Julia Soaemias, and Julia Mamaea – in the historiographical works by Cassius Dio, Herodian, and in the Historia Augusta. These works have fundamentally shaped our perceptions of the Severan empresses and the Severan era at large. These depictions, however, should not be taken at face value and are, as this thesis aims to show, best understood as rhetorical devices. By placing the depictions of these women in the broader context of the aims of Roman imperial historiography as a genre and the Roman historiographers’ respective narratives and theses, this thesis argues that the characterisations of the Severan empresses were first and foremost determined by their rhetorical functions in the assessments of their male kin – particularly their imperial (grand)sons. The portrayals of the Severan empresses were furthermore formed by subverting the ideal of the Augusta and the official Severan representations of these women, by eastern stereotypes, and earlier historiographical depictions of other imperial women. “And I have met my destiny in quite a similar way, The history book on the shelf, Is always repeating itself” Benny Andersson, Björn Ulvaeus, Stig Anderson, Waterloo Contents Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Severan Family Tree .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Historiography .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Method ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Roman Historiography, its Machinations, and the Role of Women ..................... 14 1.1 The Development of Imperial Historiography ................................................................................... 14 1.2. History and Biography in Roman Imperial Historiography ........................................................ 15 1.3. Inner Workings, Exempla and Topoi ..................................................................................................... 17 1.4. Manliness as a Virtue ................................................................................................................................... 18 1.5. Concerning Emperors and their Female Kin ..................................................................................... 19 1.6. Going Public: Female Transgressions into the Public Sphere .................................................... 20 1.7. Imperial Women, Imperial Virtues ........................................................................................................ 21 1.8. Imperial Mothers........................................................................................................................................... 24 1.9. Oriental Influence ......................................................................................................................................... 26 1.10. Eastern Rulers and Allegations of Easternness in Roman Historiography ........................ 27 1.11. Gendering the East and its Corrupting Nature ............................................................................... 28 1.12. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 2: Imperial and Historiographical Narratives ...................................................................... 32 2.1. Imperial Narratives regarding the Severan Empresses ................................................................ 33 2.2. Severan Narratives in Historiography ................................................................................................. 36 2.3. Cassius Dio: A Change in History and in Narrative ......................................................................... 38 2.4. Herodian: Conservative in Beliefs and Style ...................................................................................... 43 2.5. The Historia Augusta: A Narrative of Denominative Determinism .......................................... 46 2.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 50 Chapter 3: Analysis of the Narrative and Rhetorical Functions of the Severan Empresses in Roman Historiography ................................................................................................................................... 51 3.1. Cassius Dio’s Julia Domna .......................................................................................................................... 51 3.1.1. Domna under Septimius Severus ................................................................................................... 52 3.1.2. Domna under Caracalla ...................................................................................................................... 53 3.1.3. Domna after Caracalla’s death ........................................................................................................ 57 3.2. Herodian’s Julia Domna .............................................................................................................................. 59 3.3. The Historia Augusta’s Julia Domna ...................................................................................................... 62 3.4. Conclusion Julia Domna .............................................................................................................................. 64 3.5. Cassius Dio’s Julia Maesa and Julia Soaemias .................................................................................... 66 3.6. Herodian’s Julia Maesa and Julia Soaemias ........................................................................................ 71 3.7. The Historia Augusta’s Julia Maesa and Julia Soaemias................................................................. 75 3.8. Conclusion Julia Maesa and Julia Soaemias ........................................................................................ 80 3.9. Cassius Dio’s Julia Mamaea ....................................................................................................................... 81 3.10. Herodian’s Julia Mamaea ......................................................................................................................... 82 3.11. The Historia Augusta’s Julia Mamaea ................................................................................................. 87 3.12. Conclusion Julia Mamaea ........................................................................................................................ 91 3.13. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 92 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................... 94 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................. 97 Primary Sources ..................................................................................................................................................... 97 Literature .................................................................................................................................................................. 98 Pictures ................................................................................................................................................................... 105 ~ 2 ~ Abbreviations Amm. Marc. – Ammianus Marcellinus, History Arist. Eth. Nic. – Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics Aur. Vict. Caes. – Aurelius Victor, History Cass. Dio – Cassius Dio, Roman History Cic. Brut. – Cicero, Brutus Cic. De or. – Cicero, On the Orator Cic. Mil. – Cicero, Pro Milone Cic. Part. Or. – Cicero, A Dialogue Concerning Oratorical Partitions Diod. Sic. – Diodorus Siculus, Library of History Flor. Epit. – Florus, Epitome of Roman History Hdn. – Herodian, History of the Empire from the Death of Marcus Hdt. – Herodotus, Histories Juv. Sat. – Juvenal, Satires Lactant. Div. inst. – Lactantius, The Divine Institutes Livy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pushing the Limit: an Analysis of the Women of the Severan Dynasty
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Greek and Roman Studies 4-24-2015 Pushing the Limit: An Analysis of the Women of the Severan Dynasty Colleen Melone Illinois Wesleyan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/grs_honproj Part of the Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons Recommended Citation Melone, Colleen, "Pushing the Limit: An Analysis of the Women of the Severan Dynasty" (2015). Honors Projects. 5. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/grs_honproj/5 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Colleen Melone Pushing the Limit: An Analysis of the Women of the Severan Dynasty Abstract By applying Judith Butler’s theories of identity to the imperial women of the Severan dynasty in ancient Rome, this paper proves that while the Severan women had many identities, such as wife, mother, philosopher, or mourner, their imperial identity was most valued due to its ability to give them the freedom to step outside many aspects of their gender and to behave in ways which would customarily be deemed inappropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Responses to the Rise and Fall of Sol Elagabal in the Roman Empire
    EMPIRE OF THE SUN? CIVIC RESPONSES TO THE RISE AND FALL OF SOL ELAGABAL IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE Martijn Icks During its long and turbulent history, the city of Rome witnessed many changes in its religious institutions and traditions. For many centuries, these came to pass under the benevolent eye of Iupiter Optimus Maximus, the city‟s supreme deity since time immemorial. Not until the fourth century AD would Iupiter finally loose this position to the monotheistic, omnipotent God of Christianity. However, the power of the thunder god had been challenged before. The first deity who temporarily conquered his throne was Sol Invictus Elagabal, a local sun god from the Syrian town of Emesa. This unlikely usurper was the personal god of the emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, whose short-lived reign lasted from 218 to 222 AD, and who has been nicknamed Elagabalus for his affiliation with Elagabal. Even before his rise to power, Elagabalus served as Elagabal‟s high priest. The deity was worshipped in the form of a conical black stone, a so-called baitylos or “house of god”, which resided in a big temple in Emesa. Elagabalus, at that time a fourteen-year-old boy, performed ritual dances in honour of his god. By doing so, he drew the attention of Roman soldiers who were stationed near the town. They proclaimed the boy emperor under the false pretense that he was a bastard son of emperor Caracalla (211-217 AD). Elagabalus won sufficient military support, defeated the reigning emperor and thus gained the throne. He installed himself in Rome and took his god with him.
    [Show full text]
  • A Romano-British Ring Bezel in the Form of the Denarius of Julia Maesa from Ulceby, Lincolnshire Antony Lee, the Collection: Art and Archaeology in Lincolnshire
    Lincolnshire Past and Present, Issue 89, Autumn 2012 A Romano-British ring bezel in the form of the denarius of Julia Maesa from Ulceby, Lincolnshire Antony Lee, The Collection: Art and Archaeology in Lincolnshire The Collection has recently acquired an unusual piece of Romano-British jewellery. The item in question is the bezel of a ring made from a Roman coin. Although the hoop of the ring is lost and oly the ezel suries, it is oetheless a ost uusual ad oteorthy additio to the Coutys archaeological collections. The bezel was discovered at Ulceby with Fordington, between Alford and Spilsby in March 2011 and reported as treasure. Although single coin finds are not classed as treasure under the definition in the 1996 Treasure Act, the conversion of this coin into an item of jewellery makes it eligible. The coin is a silver denarius of Julia Maesa, minted in Rome between AD220 and AD222. The obverse shows the draped bust of Julia Maesa, the reverse the figure of Felicitas, the personification of good fortune, holding a long caduceus whilst sacrificing over an altar. The reverse legend, now alost etirely lost, reads SAECVLI FELICITAS – which optimistically translates as the happiess of the age. Julia Maesa herself was a member of one of the most interesting of Imperial dynasties, the Severans, and related to a number of Emperors. She was the sister in law of the Emperor Septimius Severus, grandmother of the Emperors Elagabalus and Alexander Severus and the aunt of the Emperor Caracalla and his murdered younger brother Geta. Far from being a passive figure, she actively involved herself in imperial politics, particularly in her successful plot to overthrow the Emperor Macrinus and replace him with Elagabalus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Augustae: the Most Powerful Women Who Ever Lived a Collection of Six Silver Coins
    The Roman Augustae: The Most Powerful Women Who Ever Lived A Collection of Six Silver Coins Frieze of Severan Dynasty All coins in each set are protected in an archival capsule and beautifully displayed in a mahogany-like box. The box set is accompanied with a story card, certificate of authenticity, and a black gift box. The best-known names of ancient Rome are invariably male, and in the 500 years between the reigns of Caesar Augustus and Justinian I, not a single woman held the Roman throne—not even during the chaotic Crisis of the Third Century, when new emperors claimed the throne every other year. This does not mean that women were not vital to the greatest empire the world has ever known. Indeed, much of the time, the real wielders of imperial might were the wives, sisters, and mothers of the emperors. Never was this more true than during the 193-235, when three women—the sisters Julia Maesa and Julia Domna, and Julia Maesa’s daughter Julia Avita Mamaea—secured the succession of their husbands, sons, and grandsons to the imperial throne, thus guaranteeing that they would remain in control. The dynasty is known in the history books as “the Severan,” for Julia Domna’s husband Septimius Severus, but it was the three Julias—and none of the men—who were really responsible for this relatively transition of power. These remarkable women, working in a patriarchal system that officially excluded them from assuming absolute power, nevertheless managed to have their way. Our story begins in Emesa, capital of the Roman client kingdom of Syria, in the year 187 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Rejected Ruler
    CHAPTER 4 THE REJECTED RULER ‘Nor emperor he, nor Antoninus, nor citizen, nor senator, nor man of noble blood, nor Roman’ - Historia Augusta, Vita Severi Alexandri During his reign, Elagabalus had presented himself as a good and worthy ruler: first as a be- nevolent monarch in the tradition of the Antonines, later as the invincible priest-emperor of Elagabal. After he had been violently overthrown by the praetorians, this positive image was discarded in favour of another, far less flattering view. To what extent this change reflected a genuine dislike for the priest-emperor, and to what extent it was merely keeping in line with the propaganda of Severus Alexander, who had little choice but to condemn his predecessor, is a question which remains ultimately unanswerable. However, this chapter will not only describe the negative images which emerged in Greek and Roman literature after Elagabalus’s death, but will also offer possible explanations for the reasons why particular authors chose to portray the emperor in particular ways. What we are interested in, is the construction of a fic- tional Elagabalus, an imperial monster who surpassed Caligula, Nero and Commodus in al- leged wickedness and vice. Starting with Xenophon in the fourth century BC, who wrote a panegyric on the Spar- tan king Agesilaos, many Greek and Roman authors had defined the boundaries of good and bad rule.1 A good ruler typically came from a line of noble and worthy ancestors. He re- spected the gods, loved his country and ruled wisely and justly, taking heed of the advice of good and worthy councilors.
    [Show full text]
  • Emperor Elagabalus and Traditional Roman Religion
    Emperor Elagabalus and Traditional Roman Religion The Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus is best-known to history as Elagabalus due to his affiliation with the Syrian god of the same name. As a youth he became a priest of Elagabalus in Syria, and he brought the worship of this god along with himself to the Roman capital. There the god Elagabalus was assimilated with different aspects of the Roman sun-god Sol (especially Sol Invictus or the “unconquered sun”). This, in turn, led to affiliation with the Greek sun-god Helios, from which we get an alternative name for both the emperor and god, Heliogabalus. Recent scholarship has also pushed to reclaim the identification of this emperor by his birth-name, Varius Avitus Bassianus, and examinations of his life as Varian studies (de Arrizabalaga y Prado, 2005). All of these distinctions are used for an emperor who only ruled the Roman Empire for four years (218-222 CE), and is most noted for his religious preference for the god Elagabalus, a questionable sexual identity, and a lack of mental stability. This paper examines Elagabalus and his interactions with traditional Roman religious practices. As emperor he was also pontifex maximus or high priest of and responsible for overseeing Rome’s traditional cults, festivals and sacred objects. Holding multiple priesthoods would not have been in and of itself a problem for most Romans. However, Elagabalus showed overwhelming preference for his god, who was relatively unknown in the capital but at the clear expense of Rome’s traditional religions. The Historia Augusta provides the fullest account of Elagabalus’s outrages including the transfer of sacred objects to his god’s temple including the emblem of the Mother Goddess, fire of Vesta, Palladium, and sacred shields (3.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Magic and the Roman Emperors
    1 MAGIC AND THE ROMAN EMPERORS (1 Volume) Submitted by Georgios Andrikopoulos, to the University of Exeter as a thesis/dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics, July 2009. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. ..................................... (signature) 2 Abstract Roman emperors, the details of their lives and reigns, their triumphs and failures and their representation in our sources are all subjects which have never failed to attract scholarly attention. Therefore, in view of the resurgence of scholarly interest in ancient magic in the last few decades, it is curious that there is to date no comprehensive treatment of the subject of the frequent connection of many Roman emperors with magicians and magical practices in ancient literature. The aim of the present study is to explore the association of Roman emperors with magic and magicians, as presented in our sources. This study explores the twofold nature of this association, namely whether certain emperors are represented as magicians themselves and employers of magicians or whether they are represented as victims and persecutors of magic; furthermore, it attempts to explore the implications of such associations in respect of the nature and the motivations of our sources. The case studies of emperors are limited to the period from the establishment of the Principate up to the end of the Severan dynasty, culminating in the short reign of Elagabalus.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Symbols on Ancient Coins of the Roman Empire – Part Iii: 193–235 Ad
    STELLAR SYMBOLS ON ANCIENT COINS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE – PART III: 193–235 AD ELENI ROVITHIS-LIVANIOU1, FLORA ROVITHIS2 1Dept of Astrophysics, Astronomy & Mechanics, Faculty of Physics, Athens University, Panepistimiopolis, Zographos 15784, Athens, Greece Email: [email protected] 2Email: fl[email protected] Abstract. We continue to present and describe some ancient Roman coins with astro- nomical symbols like the Moon, the Zodiac signs, the stars, etc. The coins presented in this Paper correspond to the Roman Empire covering the interval (193 - 235) AD, which corresponds mainly to the Severan dynasty. Key words: Astronomy in culture – Ancient Roman coins – Roman emperors – Stellar symbols. 1. PROLOGUE In a series of papers ancient Greek and Roman coins with astronomical sym- bols were shown, (Rovithis-Livaniou and Rovithis, 2011–2012 and 2014–2015,a&b). Especially the last two of them, hereafter referred as Paper I & II corresponded to the Roman Empire and covered the intervals 27 BD to 95 AD and 96 to 192 AD, re- spectively. Thus, the Roman numismatic system, and its coins has been examined in detail. For this reason, we do not repeat it here, where we continue with coins of the same subject covering the period (193–235) AD that corresponds mainly to the Severan dynasty. What it is worthwhile to be mentioned is that during this time interval, and when there was some numismatic crisis, the silver contain of the denary was reduced. For example during Caracalla’s[1] epoch a specific silver plated coin with less silver than denary was issued the so-called antonianus or the radiative.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, and Severan Cultural Geography Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7j2862k0 Author Bingley, Christopher Stephen Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, and Severan Cultural Geography A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Christopher Stephen Bingley 2019 © Copyright by Christopher Stephen Bingley 2019 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, And Severan Cultural Geography by Christopher Stephen Bingley Doctor of Philosophy in History University of CaliforniA, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor DAvid DAniel Phillips, Chair During the first two centuries C.E., provinciAl Greek elites reActed to their new stAtus as denizens of the RomAn Empire in part with the literature they produced, often grouped under the heAding of the Second Sophistic. The tAil end of this period, in which a new dynasty of emperors ruled And underwent a crisis of legitimAcy (193-235 C.E.), wAs mArkedly different in the identity of the imperiAl family and as a result the composition of Greek literature. This distinction, however, has not been part of the scholArly approach to the study of this period’s literature, which insteAd focuses on the traits that it shares with eArlier sophistic literature. During this lAter period, the debate over what constituted proper “RomAnness” acquired renewed cultural importAnce especiAlly becAuse of the Severan imperiAl family’s outsider stAtus, SyriAn and AfricAn background, and decree of universAl citizenship in 212 C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 34 AÜEDFD 62 Özge ALTUN Lusnia, Susan, Sowers (1995)
    Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Atatürk University Journal of Faculty of Letters Sayı / Number 62, Haziran / June 2019, 19-44 SEVERUSLAR DÖNEMİ KADIN PORTRELERİ* Women Portraits of Severan Period (Makale Geliş Tarihi: 14.12.2018 / Kabul Tarihi: 22.05.2019) Özge ALTUN** Öz Roma İmparatorluk Tarihine baktığımız zaman, Severuslar Döne- minde sosyal, ekonomik ve siyasal krizlerin giderek arttığı görülmektedir. Severuslar Dönemi sonrasında gerçekleşen 3.yy krizleri de bu durumun en iyi göstergesidir. Makalenin konusunu oluşturan "Severuslar Dönemi Kadın Portreleri"nde, imparatorluk içinde yaşanılan karışıklıkların portre stiline et- kisi ve sonucunda oluşan stilin özellikleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Severus- lar Dönemi kadın portreleri stili ve önemli şahsiyetlerinin portrelerinin kimlik tespitinde kullanılabilecek karakteristik özellikler saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Makale içinde Severuslar Döneminde öne çıkan ve bilinen kadınlar (impara- toriçeler) ve portre örnekleri kronolojik bir sırayla tanımlanmıştır. Augusta- lardan sonra sivil portreler değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar genel değerlendirme kısmında bütün olarak ele alınmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Roma İmparatorluğu, Severuslar Dönemi, Portre Sanatı. Abstract When we look at the history of Roman Empire, it is seen that social, economic and political crises have increased gradually in the period of Se- * Bu makale Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Arkeoloji Anabilim Dalın- da gerçekleştirilen "Geç Roma Dönemi Portreleri" isimli doktora tez çalışmasının bir bölümünden türetilmiştir. ** Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Bozok Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Arkeoloji Bölümü, As- sist Prof. Dr. Bozok University Faculty of Science and Literature, Departmenf of Ar- chaeology, [email protected] ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-7491- 5794 20 AÜEDFD 62 Özge ALTUN verus. The crisis of the 3rd century after the Severus Period is also the best indicator of this situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Elagabalus (218–222 AD): East Meets West with the Assassination of Caracalla, Macrinus Became Emperor, but the Powerful Sever
    Elagabalus (218–222 AD): East Meets West With the assassination of Caracalla, Macrinus became emperor, but the powerful Severan family would not accept the loss of power so easily. They immediately began plotting. In response, Macrinus expelled the family from Antioch and Julia Domna, already seriously ill, starved herself to death. Her sister, Julia Maesa, began to spread the rumor that her grandson, Varius Avitus Bassianus, son of her daughter Julia Soaemias, was the secret child of Caracalla. The child was the high priest of the Syrian god El-Gabal, and thus he was called Elagabalus. Sometimes he is also called Heliogabalus, from the Greek god Helios, who was considered the Greek equivalent of El-Gabal. Julia Maesa convinced the Third Legion and its general, Comazon, to proclaim Elagabalus emperor. More legions followed, discontent that Macrinus had ended the ill- conceived war against Parthia and revoked the high salaries Caracalla had bestowed on the troops. The legions loyal to Elagabalus and Julia met Macrinus’s forces at Antioch and defeated the emperor. Macrinus fled but was captured and executed. Elagabalus was hailed by all as emperor. Before Elagabalus and his family arrived in Italy, his supporters sent a painting of him to the Roman Senate. Elagabalus was portrayed with mascara and priestly robes, characteristics of an Easterner, which was offensive to traditional Roman values. This impression was made worse when the new emperor actually arrived. Elagabalus entered the city on foot while a meteorite, the embodiment of his god, was carried on a triumphal chariot in a bed of priceless gems.
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Domna: the Most Powerful Woman Who Ever Lived Silver Denarius
    Julia Domna: The Most Powerful Woman Who Ever Lived Silver Denarius All coins in each set are protected in an archival capsule and beautifully displayed in a mahogany -like box. The box set is accompanied with a story card, certificate of authenticity, and a black gift box. The best-known names of ancient Rome are invariably male, and in the 500 years between the reigns of Caesar Augustus and Justinian I, not a single woman held the Roman throne—not even during the chaotic Crisis of the Third Century, when new emperors claimed the throne every other year. This does not mean that women were not vital to the greatest empire the world has ever known. Indeed, much of the time, the real wielders of imperial might were the wives, sisters, and mothers of the emperors. Never was this more true than during the reign of Septimius Severus, when Julia Domna—his wife, his Augusta, and his primary advisor—working in a patriarchal system that officially excluded them from assuming absolute power, nevertheless managed to have her way. Our story begins in Emesa, capital of the Roman client kingdom of Syria, in the year 187 CE. The 42-year-old widower Septimius Severus, a tribune of the plebs, had been told by astrologers that he would find his future wife in the province. He met with Julius Bassianus, the pagan high priest and aristocrat, who introduced him to his brilliant 17-year-old daughter, Julia Domna, a prodigy who was well versed in philosophy—and a great beauty. The two wed the following year.
    [Show full text]