Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield Anthony Kosturjak, Steve Whetton, Michael O’Neil and Mark Trevithick Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 15/43 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a partnership between the South Australian Government through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute will enhance the South Australian Government’s capacity to develop and deliver science-based policy solutions in water management. It brings together the best scientists and researchers across Australia to provide expert and independent scientific advice to inform good government water policy and identify future threats and opportunities to water security. The following Associate organisations contributed to this report: Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research Level 1, Torrens Building 220 Victoria Square, Adelaide, SA, 5000 Tel: 08-8303 8952 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Kosturjak, A, Whetton, S, O’Neil, M and Trevithick, M, 2015, Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 15/43, Adelaide, South Australia. Copyright © 2015 South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (SACES). To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (SACES). Disclaimer The Participants advise that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research and does not warrant or represent the completeness of any information or material in this publication. Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield Contents Contents Abbreviations and Glossary i Acknowledgements i Executive Summary ii 1. Introduction 1 2. Background 2 2.1 Establishment of Marine Parks and Sanctuary Zones 2 2.2 Previous Estimates of Potential Impacts 4 2.3 Buybacks of Licences and Quotas 8 3. Method 10 3.1 Choice of Regions 10 3.1.1 Ceduna 10 3.1.2 Kangaroo Island 10 3.1.3 Port Wakefield 13 3.2 Approach 14 3.3 Stakeholders 18 3.3.1 Stakeholders Affected 18 3.3.2 Stakeholders Consulted 18 3.4 Data Limitations 19 4. Community Survey 22 4.1 Methods 22 4.2 Results 22 5. Ceduna 28 5.1 Social-economic Indicators 29 5.1.1 Socio-economic Profile 29 5.1.2 Economic Structure 31 5.1.3 Economic and Social Indicators 32 5.2 Commercial Fisheries 44 5.2.1 Abalone Fishery 44 5.2.2 Rock Lobster Fishery 46 5.2.3 Marine Scalefish Fishery 48 5.2.4 Charter Boat Fishery 50 5.3 Evidence for Economic Impact 50 5.4 Consultations 52 5.5 Environmental Impact 55 6. Kangaroo Island 56 6.1 Social-economic Indicators 57 6.1.1 Socio-economic Profile 57 6.1.2 Economic Structure 59 6.1.3 Economic and Social Indicators 61 6.2 Commercial Fisheries 72 6.2.1 Abalone Fishery 72 6.2.2 Rock Lobster Fishery 72 6.2.3 Marine Scalefish Fishery 77 6.2.4 Charter Boat Fishery 78 6.3 Evidence for Economic Impact 79 6.4 Consultations 82 6.5 Environmental Impact 88 7. Port Wakefield (Wakefield) 89 7.1 Social-economic Indicators 90 7.1.1 Socio-economic Profile 90 7.1.2 Economic Structure 92 7.1.3 Economic and Social Indicators 94 7.2 Commercial Fisheries 102 7.2.1 Abalone Fishery 102 7.2.2 Rock Lobster Fishery 102 7.2.3 Marine Scalefish Fishery 102 7.2.4 Charter Boat Fishery 105 7.3 Evidence for Economic Impact 105 7.4 Consultations 107 7.5 Environmental Impact 115 The Goyder Institute for Water Research Final Report: 1 October 2015 Contents Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield 8. Broader Impacts 116 8.1 Economic Factors 117 8.1.1 Retail Prices 117 8.1.2 Boat Registrations 121 8.2 Commercial Fisheries 121 8.2.1 Abalone Fishery 122 8.2.2 Rock Lobster Fishery 126 8.2.3 Marine Scalefish Fishery 127 8.2.4 Charter Boat Fishery 133 8.2.5 State-wide Impact on the Value of Catch 134 8.2.6 Impact on the Value of Catch, Selected Regions 135 9. Conclusion and Recommendations 139 Bibliography 145 Appendix A: Region Maps 147 Appendix B: Stakeholder Consultations: List of People and Organisations Consulted 154 Appendix C: Fisheries Management Change Summaries 155 Appendix D: Spatial Areas Used for Fisheries Management 160 Appendix E: Disclaimer and Metadata for Maps 164 Appendix F: Environmental Indicators – Ceduna 167 Appendix G: Environmental Indicators – Kangaroo Island 179 Appendix H: Environmental Indicators – Port Wakefield 198 Appendix I: Allocation of Ports to Regions, Fisheries Administrative Data 206 This report was prepared by the following SACES researchers: Anthony Kosturjak, Senior Research Economist Steve Whetton, Deputy Director Associate Professor Michael O’Neil, Executive Director Mark Trevithick, Research Economist Disclaimer: This study, while embodying the best efforts of the investigators is but an expression of the issues considered most relevant, and neither SACES, the investigators, nor the Universities can be held responsible for any consequences that ensue from the use of the information in this report. Neither SACES, the investigators, nor the Universities make any warranty or guarantee regarding the contents of the report, and any warranty or guarantee is disavowed except to the extent that statute makes it unavoidable. Final Report: 1 October 2015 The Goyder Institute for Water Research Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield Page i Abbreviations and Glossary ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics DEWNR Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources CPUE Catch per unit effort (a measure of productivity in commercial fisheries) FTE Full-time equivalent (a measure of job impact expressed in terms of hours worked by full- time workers) GSP Gross State Product (a measure of the total market value of all goods and services produced in the state) MFA Marine Fishing Area (spatial administrative unit for recording fisheries data) MP Marine Park MSF Marine scalefish fishery PIRSA Department of Primary Industries and Regions, South Australia SACES South Australian Centre for Economic Studies SALM Small Area Labour Markets SARDI South Australian Research and Development Institute SAU Spatial Assessment Unit SZ Sanctuary zone TACC Total allowable commercial catch Acknowledgements SACES would like to thank the various individuals and organisations that supported and helped inform the Regional Impact Assessment Statement. In particular, we would like to thank the commercial fishers in the various regions for taking the time to meet and provide feedback on their experiences, including industry representatives and regional representatives for the main fisheries who helped organise access to fishers. Similarly, we thank those individuals and organisations that provided submissions and responded to our enquiries. The level of analysis undertaken would not have been possible without the support of staff of DEWNR, PIRSA, SARDI and the State Government Marine Parks Regional Impacts Working Group who provided background information, access to various data, identified relevant stakeholders, and clarified various issues as they arose. We would also like to thank the peer reviewers for providing insightful comments on the draft report which allowed us to make a range of improvements to the report. Any remaining errors, omissions or misinterpretations of data are the authors’ own. The Goyder Institute for Water Research Final Report: 1 October 2015 Page ii Sanctuary Zones Regional Impact Assessment Statement: Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield Executive Summary Background The following Regional Impact Assessment Statement (RIAS) summarises the results of an investigation into the economic, social and environmental impacts of marine park sanctuary zones (SZ) on the South Australian communities of Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield. The aim of the RIAS is to “identify the actual negative and positive impacts of the sanctuary zones on these communities” and assess “effects on employment, existing businesses, capital investment, average income, local population and future development potential” (State Government statement, October 2014). The South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (SACES) is a joint research unit between the University of Adelaide and Flinders University. As a partner of the Goyder Institute for Water Research, SACES was engaged by the Goyder Institute as independent experts to undertake the RIAS. Management plans for the State’s 19 marine parks were adopted in 2012. As part of the subsequent final management plans for marine parks, zoning for 83 SZs covering about 6 per cent of the state’s waters was established. Provisions relating to the prohibition of commercial and recreational fishing in the SZs came into effect on 1 October 2014. In addition to providing habitat protection, SZs are designed to have long-term benefits for a range of species in terms of changes in size and/or abundance (Bailey et al. 2012a) that may have positive socio-economic impacts. However, in the short term there are valid concerns that there may be some socio-economic impacts for commercial and recreational fishers and regional communities due to the loss of fishing grounds and displacement of fishing effort. In response to this concern, the State Government pledged to complete a RIAS by 1 October 2015 for three regions – Ceduna, Kangaroo Island and Port Wakefield. Methodology and Limitations The RIAS was undertaken using a mixed methods approach involving analysis of existing economic and social indicators, including commercial fisheries data; economic modelling to estimate broader flow-on economic impacts for the regions; consultations with regional stakeholders; and conduct of a community survey to gauge community attitudes.
Recommended publications
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF
    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Ceduna 3D Marine Seismic Survey, Great Australian Bight
    Referral of proposed action Project title: Ceduna 3D Marine Seismic Survey, Great Australian Bight 1 Summary of proposed action 1.1 Short description BP Exploration (Alpha) Limited (BP) proposes to undertake the Ceduna three-dimensional (3D) marine seismic survey across petroleum exploration permits EPP 37, EPP 38, EPP 39 and EPP 40 located in the Great Australian Bight (GAB). The proposed survey area is located in Commonwealth marine waters of the Ceduna sub-basin, between 1000 m and 3000 m deep, and is about 400 km west of Port Lincoln and 300 km southwest of Ceduna in South Australia. The proposed seismic survey is scheduled to commence no earlier than October 2011 and to conclude no later than end of May 2012. The survey is expected to take approximately six months to complete allowing for typical weather downtime. Outside this time window, metocean conditions become unsuitable for 3D seismic operations. The survey will be conducted by a specialist seismic survey vessel towing a dual seismic source array and 12 streamers, each 8,100 m long. 1.2 Latitude and longitude The proposed survey area is shown in Figure 1 with boundary coordinates provided in Table 1. Table 1. Boundary coordinates for the proposed survey area (GDA94) Point Latitude Longitude 1 35°22'15.815"S 130°48'50.107"E 2 35°11'50.810"S 131°02'16.061"E 3 35°02'37.061"S 131°02'15.972"E 4 35°24'55.520"S 131°30'41.981"E 5 35°14'38.653"S 131°42'16.982"E 6 35°00'47.460"S 131°41'40.052"E 7 34°30'09.196"S 131°02'44.991"E 8 34°06'27.572"S 131°02'11.557"E 9 33°41'24.007"S 130°31'04.931"E 10 33°41'25.575"S 130°15'22.936"E 11 34°08'47.552"S 130°12'34.972"E 12 34°09'16.169"S 129°41'03.591"E 13 34°18'22.970"S 129°29'32.951"E BP Ceduna 3D MSS Referral Page 1 of 48 1.3 Locality and property description The proposed seismic survey will take place in the permit areas for EPP 37, EPP 38, EPP 39 and EPP 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Protection Act 1992
    Wilderness Protection Act 1992 ANNUAL REPORT 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 Wilderness Protection Act 1992 Annual Report 2014-15 For further information please contact: Manager, Protected Areas Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Telephone: (08) 8124 4707 Website: www.environment.sa.gov.au ABN: 36 702 093 234 ISSN: 1832-9357 IBSN: 978-1-921800-72-6 September 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ................................................................................... 4 WILDERNESS PROTECTION ACT 1992 ANNUAL REPORT ..................................... 5 OBJECTS OF THE WILDERNESS PROTECTION ACT ............................. 5 ADMINISTRATION OF THE ACT ...................................................... 5 IDENTIFICATION OF LAND UNDER THE ACT ..................................... 5 CONSTITUTION OF LAND UNDER THE ACT ....................................... 6 ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................ 6 NAMES, LOCATIONS AND QUALITY OF WILDERNESS PROTECTION AREAS AND ZONES ................................................................................ 7 EXTENT OF MINING OPERATIONS IN WILDERNESS PROTECTION ZONES14 MANAGEMENT OF WILDERNESS PROTECTION AREAS AND ZONES ...... 14 MANAGEMENT PLANS ADOPTED ................................................... 16 DECLARATION OF PROHIBITED AREAS .......................................... 17 EXPENDITURE ON MANAGEMENT OF WILDERNESS PROTECTION AREAS17 MONIES RECEIVED AND EXPENDED ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coffin Bay National Park National Bay Coffin
    www.environment.sa.gov.au you have appropriate wet-weather clothing. wet-weather appropriate have you • Weather conditions can change quickly. Ensure Ensure quickly. change can conditions Weather • April 2008 • FIS 80006 FIS • 2008 April route and expected time of return. of time expected and route © Department for Environment and Heritage and Environment for Department © visit areas. visit Inform a responsible person of your proposed proposed your of person responsible a Inform • weather may frequent camp sites and day day and sites camp frequent may weather Keep to the defined walking trail. walking defined the to Keep • Website: www.parks.sa.gov.au Website: Bees seeking water during hot summer summer hot during water seeking Bees - Bees • drinking water. drinking Email: [email protected] Email: and await police direction. police await and Do not rely on tanks or creeks in the park for for park the in creeks or tanks on rely not Do Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910 8204 (08) Line Information Phone thick smoke or flames. Seek refuge in bare areas areas bare in refuge Seek flames. or smoke thick Carry sufficient food and drinking water. water. drinking and food sufficient Carry • area. During a bushfire, avoid driving through through driving avoid bushfire, a During area. Wear sturdy shoes, hat and sunscreen. and hat shoes, sturdy Wear • Web: www.environment.sa.gov.au/parks/ Web: Large bushfires have occurred in this this in occurred have bushfires Large - Bushfires • Be prepared when bushwalking: when prepared Be Fax: (08) 8688 3110 8688 (08) Fax: and keep within the speed limit.
    [Show full text]
  • (Haliaeetus Leucogaster) and the Eastern Osprey (Pandion Cristatus
    SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ORNITHOLOGIST VOLUME 37 - PART 1 - March - 2011 Journal of The South Australian Ornithological Association Inc. In this issue: Osprey and White-bellied Sea-Eagle populations in South Australia Birds of Para Wirra Recreation Park Bird report 2009 March 2011 1 Distribution and status of White-bellied Sea-Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, and Eastern Osprey, Pandion cristatus, populations in South Australia T. E. DENNIS, S. A. DETmAR, A. V. BROOkS AND H. m. DENNIS. Abstract Surveys throughout coastal regions and in the INTRODUCTION Riverland of South Australia over three breeding seasons between May 2008 and October 2010, Top-order predators, such as the White-bellied estimated the population of White-bellied Sea- Sea-Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, and Eastern Eagle, Haliaeetus leucogaster, as 70 to 80 pairs Osprey, Pandion cristatus, are recognised and Eastern Osprey, Pandion cristatus, as 55 to indicator species by which to measure 65 pairs. Compared to former surveys these data wilderness quality and environmental integrity suggest a 21.7% decline in the White-bellied Sea- in a rapidly changing world (Newton 1979). In Eagle population and an 18.3% decline for Eastern South Australia (SA) both species have small Osprey over former mainland habitats. Most (79.2%) populations with evidence of recent declines sea-eagle territories were based on offshore islands linked to increasing human activity in coastal including Kangaroo Island, while most (60.3%) areas (Dennis 2004; Dennis et al. 2011 in press). osprey territories were on the mainland and near- A survey of the sea-eagle population in the shore islets or reefs. The majority of territories were mid 1990s found evidence for a decline in the in the west of the State and on Kangaroo Island, with breeding range since European colonisation three sub-regions identified as retaining significant (Dennis and Lashmar 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-89.02.017.Pdf
    t9l .Ig6I pup spu?Fr rr"rl?r1mv qnos raq1oaqt dq panqs tou pus 916I uao^\teq sluauennboJ puu surelqord lusue8suuur 1eneds wq sauo8a uc .fu1mpw snorru,r aql uI luar&(oldua ',uq .(tg6l a;oJareqt puuls1oore8ueltr 0t dpo 1u reted lS sr ur saiuzqc aql s,roqs osIB elqeJ srqt usrmoJ 'urpilsny 'V'S) puels tseSrul geu oq; ur 1sa?re1p4ql aql 3o luetugedeq Z alq?J rrr rtr\oqs su padoldua puu prr"lsr aroqsJJorrprJpnsnv qlnos lsJErel aql ruJ ere,u eldoed ZS9 I feqf pa roqs snsseC srllsll?ls dq r ?olp sp qlr^\ puplsl oorp8ue1 Jo neomg u"rl?Jlsnv eql uo{ sorn8g luereJ lsour ,u1 0g€ t Jo eW T86I ul puu 00S € ,{lel?urxorddu sr uoqelndod '(derd ur '8ur,no:8 7r luosaJd eqJ petec pue uoqcnpord ,a uosurqoU) uoqecrJqndro3 peredard Smeq ,{11uermc '(tg6l )potsa^q roJ perualo Suraq puel$ oql Jo qJnu eru sda,r-rnsaseql3o EFSer pa[elop aqJ &usJ qlvrr pedolaaap fuouoce Surqsg puu Surure; e puu pue uosurqo;) pegoder useq aleq pesn spoporu palles-er su,rr prrqsr eql sreo,{ Eurpeet:ns eq1 re,ro prru s{nser druuruqord aqt pue (puep1 ooreSuqtr rnq 698I uI peuopwqs sE^\ elrs lrrrod seaeell eql SumnJcxa) sprrelsl aroqsJJo u"{e4snv qlnos '998I raqueJeo IIl eprelepv Jo tuaruslDesIeuroJ oqt aql Jo lsou uo palelduor ueeq A\ou aaeq s,{e,rrns aro3aq ,(ueduo3 rr"4u4snv qtnos qtgf 'oAE eqt dq ,{nt p:6o1org sree,{009 6 ol 000 L uea r1aq palulosr ur slors8rry1 u,no1paserd 6rll J?eu salaed 'o?e ;o lrrrod ererrirspuulsr Surura sr 3ql Jo dllJolpu aq; sree,{ paqslqplse peuuurad lE s?a\lueurep1os uuedorng y 009 0I spuplsl dpearg pue uosr"ed pup o8e srea,{ 'seruolocuorJ-"3s rel?l puB
    [Show full text]
  • Coffin Bay National Park
    Coffin Bay National Park Elliston The Pool Campground GREAT AUSTRALIAN Seasick Bay Point Sir Isaac BIGHT Point Sir Isaac The Pool Point Burgess Mullalong Beach Phantom Cove COFFIN BAY THORNY PASSAGE FLINDERS P MARINE PARK h O c Mount Dutton a Morgans Landing I e N B S T even Mile m 'The Hut' Beach Fa r Point EYRE Longnose Reef Point COFFIN BAY PENINSULA 7 Whidbey NATIONAL Wilderness Area PARK 6 Boarding (walking access only) House CO FF IN B AY Lake Wangary nsati Black Springs Bay Se on B PENINSULA ea Wangary ch Black Springs Hike 5 Boarding House Bay Sudden Jerk Port Horse 4 Island Black Rocks Hike Peninsula HWY Hike Douglas Mount Dutton Kellidie Bay Whidbey Hike Conservation Park Port Lincoln Lake CO Eely Point Bay Damascus FFIN Point Avoid Bay Islands Port Lincoln B Whidbey The Brothers COFFIN BAY U NATIONAL PARK Conservation Park R COFFIN BAY Kellidie Bay D Note: track access OA G YANGIE BAY Y R A E by 4WD only SANCTUARY B T S R ZONE IN THORNY PASSAGE Avoid Bay Black Rocks A Rabbit Is F S C F K C O MARINE PARK Yangie Bay Coffin Bay Long Beach 3 THORNY PASSAGE D A O Yangie Bay to MARINE PARK OFFIN R C Long Beach Hike Yangie Island Hike Point Avoid on COFFIN BAY 2 lm ta Be Golden Island Lookout A ach NATIONAL Gu PARK ny Price Island Golden Island ah 4 B W ea ch D o n l Whidbey Islands y Conservation Park GUNYAH BEACH SANCTUARY ZONE COFFIN BAY PENINSULA T R A GREAT AUSTRALIAN BIGHT 0 25 50 C K 1 metres Coffin Bay Sealed road Campground Toilets Coffin Bay National Park parks.sa.gov.au Information Lookout Marine park Unsealed road DEWNR does not guarantee that this map is For more information contact: error free.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining the Monitoring of Pup Production at Key Australian Sea Lion Colonies in South Australia (2013/14)
    Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14) Simon D Goldsworthy, Alice I Mackay, Peter D Shaughnessy, Fred Bailleul and Clive R McMahon SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4 SARDI Research Report Series No. 818 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2014 Final report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre Goldsworthy, S.D. et al. Australian sea lion population monitoring Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14) Final report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre Simon D Goldsworthy, Alice I Mackay, Peter D Shaughnessy, Fred Bailleul and Clive R McMahon SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4 SARDI Research Report Series No. 818 December 2014 II Goldsworthy, S.D. et al. Australian sea lion population monitoring This publication may be cited as: Goldsworthy, S.D.1, Mackay, A.I.1, Shaughnessy, P.D. 1, 2, Bailleul, F1 and McMahon, C.R.3 (2014). Maintaining the monitoring of pup production at key Australian sea lion colonies in South Australia (2013/14). Final Report to the Australian Marine Mammal Centre. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2010/000665-4. SARDI Research Report Series No. 818. 66pp. Cover Photo: Alice I. Mackay 1 SARDI Aquatic Sciences, PO Box 120, Henley Beach, SA 5022 2South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000 3 Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW, 2088 South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyre Peninsula OCEAN 7
    Mount F G To Coober Pedy (See Flinders H I Olympic Dam J Christie Ranges and Outback Region) Village Andamooka Wynbring Roxby Downs To Maralinga Lyons Tarcoola WOOMERA PROHIBITED AREA (Restricted Entry) Malbooma 87 Lake Lake Younghusband Ferguson Patricia 1 1 Glendambo Kingoonya Lake Hanson Lake Torrens 'Coondambo' Lake Yellabinna Regional Kultanaby Lake Hart National Park Lake Harris Wirramn na Woomera Reserve Lake Torre Lake Lake Gairdner Pimba Windabout ns Everard National Park Pernatty Lagoon Island Wirrappa See map on opposite Lake page for continuation Lagoon Dog Fence 'Oakden Hill' Gairdner 'Mahanewo' 2 Yumbarra Conservation Stuart 2 Park 'Lake Everard' Lake Finnis 'Kangaroo To Nundroo (See OTC Earth Wells' 'Yalymboo' Lake Dutton map opposite) Station Bookaloo Pureba Conservation 'Moonaree' Lake Highway Penong 57 1 'Kondoolka' Lake MacFarlane Park 16 Acraman 'Yadlamalka' 59 Nunnyah Con. Res Ceduna 'Yudnapinna' Mudlamuckla 'Hiltaba' Jumpuppy Hesso To Hawker (See Bay Hill Flinders and Koolgera Cooria Hill Outback Region) Point Bell 41 Con. Res 87 Murat Smoky Mt. Gairdner 51 Goat Is. Bay 93 33 Unalla Hill 'Low Hill' St. Peter Smoky Bay Horseshoe Evans Is. Gawler Tent Hill Quorn Island 29 27 Barkers Hill 'Cariewerloo' Hill Eyre Wirrulla 67 'Yardea' 'Mount Ive' Nuyts Archipelago Is. Conservation Haslam 'Thurlga' 50 'Nonning' Park Flinders Port Augusta St. Francis Point Brown 76 Paney Hill Red Hill Streaky 46 25 3 Island 75 61 3 Bay Eyre 'Paney' Ranges Highway Army 27 Harris Bluff 'Corunna' Training Cape Bauer 39 28 43 Poochera Lake Area Olive Island 61 Iron Knob 33 45 Gilles Corvisart Highway 'Buckleboo' Streaky Bay Lake Gilles 47 Bay Minnipa Pinkawillinie Conservation Park 1 56 17 31 Point Westall 21 Highway Conservation Buckleboo 21 35 43 Eyre Sceale Bay 17 Park Iron Baron 88 Cape Blanche 43 13 27 23 Wudinna 24 24 Port Germein Searcy Bay Kulliparu Kyancutta 18 Whyalla Point Labatt Port Kenny 22 Con.
    [Show full text]
  • LOWER EYRE PENINSULA Fax : 08 8682 1843 Your fi Rst Port of Call
    98 Tasman Terrace Port Lincoln SA 5606 Tel : 08 8682 1655 LOWER EYRE PENINSULA Fax : 08 8682 1843 Your fi rst port of call www.plrealestate.com 5 10 8 3 54 1 2 35 45 5 5 63 75 87 394 6 7 4 DISTRICT MAP INDEX 12 4 7 6 5 5 6 5 8 8 5 Y Albatross Isles...........................I8 Mena Hill..................................D3 5 2 2 7 5 7 W 5 6 H Avoid Bay Is. Con. Pk. ..............E1 Mikkira Station .........................G4 6 11 4 2 7 2 5 Blackfellows Point 6 6 5 5 4 Bicker Is. ..................................F6 Morgans Landing .....................D2 5 6 3 7 Mottled Cove Mottled Cove............................A9 Mount Hope 7 3 6 6 Big Swamp...............................E4 4 1 13 8 3 8 6 2 Mt Drummond..........................B2 Hall Bay 2 8 2 Butler Tanks 1 Blackfellows Pt.........................A2 2 5 Brooker 5 3 4 4 Cape Burr Black Rocks .............................E2 Mt Dutton.................................D3 A 3 Yeelanna 11 6 2 3 A Mt Dutton Bay ..........................E3 Point Drummond POINT 2 DRUMMOND RD 6 5 Kapinnie 5 7 10 7 Port Neill Blyth Is.....................................E9 Three Mt Gawler ................................E6 9 4 4 7 8 Boarding House Bay.................E1 BRATTEN 5 Brothers 5 6 2 8 Mt Greenly ...............................C3 3 3 3 4 Boston Bay...............................F6 3 8 5 6 7 10 3 Boston Is..................................F6 Mt Hope...................................A2 4 11 7 2 5 Murray Pt.................................G6 HWY Cape Hardy Bocaut Is..................................F9 9 14 Murrunatta Con. Pk ..................E4 Picnic 10 6 4 Ungarra 2 2 2 Brooker....................................A6 Beach Mt.
    [Show full text]