DOCSLIB.ORG

Nonpoint Source Assessment Report Nibi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nonpoint Source Assessment Report Nibi NONPOINT SOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT NIBI NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT MARCH 2017 1 NONPOINT SOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT NIBI NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT FINAL DRAFT UPDATED MARCH 2018 Contact: Eric Kerney, Senior Environmental Specialist Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi - Environmental Department 1485 Mno-Bmadzewen Way Fulton, MI 49052 (269)704-7046 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 9 3. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1. Program Area Summary ............................................................................................................. 11 3.2. Water Data Collection Methods ................................................................................................ 16 3.3. Adopted Surface Water Quality Reference Values ................................................................... 16 4. WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION & LAND USE SUMMARY ............................................................. 18 4.1. Program Area Description .......................................................................................................... 18 4.2. General Setting ........................................................................................................................... 18 4.3. General Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.4. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed ....................................................................... 20 4.5. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Land Cover ................................................. 21 4.6. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – EcoRegions ................................................. 23 4.7. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Topography ................................................ 24 4.8. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Bedrock Geology ....................................... 25 4.9. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Quaternary Geology .................................. 26 4.10. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Hydrologic Soil Groups .............................. 27 4.11. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watershed – Climate & Monitoring ............................... 28 4.12. Snyder Creek Sub-Watershed .................................................................................................... 29 4.13. Snyder Creek Sub-Watershed – Land Cover .............................................................................. 30 4.14. Snyder Creek Sub-Watershed –Topography ............................................................................. 32 4.15. Snyder Creek Sub-Watershed – Hydrologic Soil Groups ........................................................... 33 5. SURFACE & GROUND WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................. 34 5.1. Surface Water ............................................................................................................................. 34 5.2. Pine Creek ................................................................................................................................... 34 5.3. Lower Nottawa Creek ................................................................................................................. 35 5.4. Snyder Creek Sub-Watershed .................................................................................................... 35 5.5. Surface Water Flow Data ........................................................................................................... 35 5.6. Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 35 5.7. Groundwater Data ..................................................................................................................... 37 5.8. Designated Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................................ 38 3 6. RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................. 39 6.1. Water Quality Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 39 6.2. Non-Point Sources and Causes of Concern................................................................................ 39 6.3. Data Presentation & Analysis .................................................................................................... 42 6.4. Data Interpretation for Each Waterbody .................................................................................. 52 6.4.1. Use Goal Attainment Status Determination ............................................................................. 52 6.4.2. Pine Creek Sampling Site Summaries ........................................................................................ 52 6.4.3. Nottawa Creek Sampling Site Summaries ................................................................................. 54 7. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 57 7.1. Pine Creek ................................................................................................................................... 59 7.2. Nottawa Creek ............................................................................................................................ 60 8. SELECTION OF NPS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES........................................................................ 61 8.1. NHBP Environmental Mission .................................................................................................... 61 8.2. Core Participants ........................................................................................................................ 61 8.3. NHBP Governance Related to NPS Program Management ...................................................... 65 8.4. Existing BMPs on NHBP Properties ............................................................................................ 66 8.5. Future BMP Selection to Reduce of Non-Point Source Pollution ............................................. 68 8.6. Partner Participation and Government Coordination .............................................................. 69 9. EXISTING NHBP AND NON-TRIBAL NPS CONTROL PROGRAMS ........................................................ 72 9.1. Existing Programs to Address NPS Water Impacts .................................................................... 72 9.2. Available NPS Programs Summary ............................................................................................ 75 10. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................ 76 11. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 78 12. APPENDICIES ................................................................................................................................... 81 12.1. APPENDIX 1 - NHBP Land Use Classification Guidelines Amended .......................................... 81 4 List of Figures Figure 1. NHBP Properties and Major Watersheds ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 2. St. Joseph River Watershed Sampling Sites ................................................................................. 14 Figure 3. Kalamazoo River Watershed Sampling Sites ................................................................................ 14 Figure 4. NHBP 2015 Water Sampling Sites ................................................................................................ 15 Figure 5. Adopted NHBP Water Quality Standards ..................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. Land Use Maps for NHBP Properties ........................................................................................... 19 Figure 7. NHBP Land Use Chart & Table ..................................................................................................... 20 Figure 8. Pine Creek & Lower Nottawa Creek Watersheds ........................................................................ 21 Figure 9. Land Cover Map, Chart, & Table of Pine & Nottawa Creek Watersheds ..................................... 22 Figure 10. EcoRegions of the Pine & Nottawa Creek Watersheds ............................................................. 23 Figure 11. Topography of the Pine & Nottawa Creek Watersheds ............................................................. 24 Figure 12. Bedrock Geology of the Pine & Nottawa Creek Watersheds..................................................... 25 Figure 13. Quaternary Geology of the Pine & Nottawa Creek Watersheds ..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kalamazoo River Assessment
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 35 September 2005 Kalamazoo River Assessment Jay K. Wesley www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 35 September 2005 Kalamazoo River Assessment Jay K. Wesley MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment
    Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Attorney General April 2021 Regulatory Notes An Environmental Assessment is prepared to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The NEPA is the Nation’s premier environmental law that guarantees every American the right to review, comment, and participate in planning of federal decisions that may affect the human environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on July 16, 2020 issued in the Federal Register a final rule updating its regulations for the NEPA (85 Fed. Reg. 43304, July 16, 2020). On January 20, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden issued an Executive Order entitled “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis” that requires agencies to immediately review promulgation of Federal regulations and other actions during the previous four years to determine consistency with Section 1 of the Executive Order. This may include the CEQ reviewing the July 16, 2020 update to the NEPA regulations. The goals of the July 2020 amendments to the NEPA regulations were to reduce paperwork and delays and to promote better decisions consistent with the policy set forth in section 101 of the NEPA. The effective date of these amended regulations was September 14, 2020. However, for actions that began before September 14th, such as this one, agencies may continue with the regulations in effect before September 14th because applying the amended regulations would cause delays to the ongoing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Oil Spill Restoration
    U.S Fish & Wildlife Service NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES Kalamazoo River Oil Spill Restoration Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Fish passage project in tributary of the Kalamazoo River Band of the Pottawatomi Tribe first project implemented from oil spill restoration plan National Oceanic and On July 25, 2010, Enbridge’s Lakehead Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Line 6B, a 30-inch diameter pipeline, and Atmospheric Administration, Match ruptured near Marshall, Michigan, and -E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of the Pot- discharged crude oil into a wetland adja- tawatomi Tribe, and the Nottawaseppi cent to Talmadge Creek in Calhoun Huron Band of the Potawatomi Tribe. County, Michigan. The oil flowed down The Trustees completed the Damage Talmadge Creek and into the Kalamazoo Assessment and Restoration Plan in Oc- River which was in floodstage at the tober, 2015. The Natural Resource Trus- State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources time (Figure 1). Oil flowed down the tees recently announced the completion Kalamazoo River and through the river of a fish passage project on Pigeon floodplain for approximately 38 miles to Creek, a tributary of the Kalamazoo Riv- Morrow Lake. Numerous species of er, in Calhoun County, Michigan. wildlife and their habitats, and their re- State of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality lated services, were injured as a result of this spill which remains the Nation’s largest inland oil spill. State of Michigan Department of the Attorney General Figure 2. The culvert system at E Drive on Pigeon Creek, a tributary of the Kalamazoo River, prior to restoration of fish passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 1 3 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 1 4 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan
    Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan Prepared by the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council March 2011 (updated August 2015) This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded in part through the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #2006-0148 to the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council for the Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. The contents of the document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Recommended Citation: Kalamazoo River Watershed Council. 2011. Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the United States Environmental Protection Agency). ii Acknowledgments This Watershed Management Plan is the culmination of several years of work on the part of the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council and particularly our Coordinator and the lead author of this report, Jeffrey A. Spoelstra. Jeff attended innumerable meetings in the community, studied dozens of reports, and assimilated and compiled the information presented here. The Plan was greatly enhanced by the technical and scientific support of Kieser & Associates, LLC, who contributed with spatial data analysis, map production, and modeling. We would also like to acknowledge our many partners in the quest to improve watershed protection and management in the Kalamazoo River watershed. Funding to prepare this Plan was provided primarily through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 319 grant administered by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ; also known as MDNRE during the report preparation).
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Selected References on PCB and the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Michigan, 1982-2002
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Annotated Bibliography of Selected References on PCB and the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Michigan, 1982-2002 Open-File Report 03-338 In cooperation with Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Cover photo: Health advisory sign warning of the dangers of eating fish contaminated by PCBs at the Plainwell dam foundation, Kalamazoo, Mich. Photo by S.J. Rheaume, U.S. Geological Survey, Lansing, Mich. Annotated Bibliography of Selected References on PCB and the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Michigan, 1982-2002 By Andreanne Simard Open-File Report 03-338 Lansing, Michigan 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Any use of firm, brand, or trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Box 25286 Lansing, MI 48911-5991 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS page Abstract . 1 Introduction . .1 Purpose and scope . .1 Acknowledgments . .9 References describing PCB releases . .9 References describing PCB remediation. 11 References describing PCB safety . 14 References describing PCB testing and cleanup. .14 References cited . .22 FIGURE 1. Map showing the location of the Kalamazoo River watershed and study area in Michigan . .2 TABLE 1. Summary of subjects contained in selected references for the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site . .3 iii CONVERSION FACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS Multiply By To obtain Mass milligram (mg) 0.00003527 ounce kilogram (kg) 2.205 pound Abbreviated water-quality units used in this report: Chemical concentrations for bed sediment are given in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), a unit expressing the concentration of chemical constituents in bed sediment (dry weight) for synthetic organic compounds and trace elements.
    [Show full text]
  • G. the KALAMAZOO RIVER a Local" History up to the Civil War Owen
    - ~ ....._..~-:-"- --- ~~~- -_._---­ ", ~. ..' i• ~.~ , ;.~ PAPERS FROM THE "HISTORY SEMINAR OF KAlJJdAZOO COLLEGE lP No. -g. THE KALAMAZOO RIVER A local" history up to the CiVil War by -~.-J Owen Williams January t 1948' TABLE···· OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I NAME, SOURCE AND RIVER DESCRIPTION . Page 1 - Franquelin's Maramee - Father de Charlevoix' Maromek - De la Potherieverifies de Charlevoix' name - Recanamazoo or "Iron Mine River" - Page 2 - Legend of :the "Boiling Kettle River" - source of the Kalamazoo River .- Page.3 - Descr~ption of the River - hydraulic power. CHAPTER II RIVER IMPROVEMENTS' Page 4 - First ideas of ~provement - Page 5 - The Kalamazoo .and Clinton Canal - First appropriations ­ Page 6 - StevensT. Mason's report - survey report of James Hurd in 1838 - William Woodbridge's report - Page 7 - John S. Barry's report - end of the Kalamazoo and Clinton Canal -. Page 8 - Senator'Wa1bridge's bill in 1848 ­ Page 9 - End of River improvements. CHAPTER III RIVER NAVIGATION AND TRADE Page 10-- Louis Herbin's instructions to Charles Langlade ­ Chicago treaty of 1821 - Oka Town and Abijah Chinchester ­ Page 11 - The "Pioneer" - The I1Tip" - "C. C. Trowbridge" - Page 12 - Description of River trips - freight rates - The "Dropp" - The "Tippecanoe" - The Michigan Central Railroad arrives ­ Tragedy of the Milwaukee - Page. 13 - The "Massabhusetts" - "Adelaide" - "Helen Marti ­ barges "Adam". and "Ever. - End of the Era. CHAPTER IV DAVID S. WALBRIDGE, KING OF THE KALAMAZOO Page 14 - Arrival from Buffalo - his activities. CHAPTER I NAME, SOURCE AND RIVER DESCRIP!'ION ",Towards Michigan's waters so broad and so blue' Flows the bright bubbling River - The Kalamazoo."l These anonymous lines could not have been written too long ago, as the Kalamazoo has not alwa"s been known by its present name.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Cleanup Sheet March 2002
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Office of Public Affairs Kalamazoo River Superfund Project Fact The Kalamazoo River Cleanup Sheet March 2002 EPA has assumed responsibility for a Superfund cleanup on the Kalamazoo River. The Allied Paper Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, referred to here as the Kalamazoo River Kalamazoo River Superfund Project, stretches 80-miles from Saugatuck on the west Superfund Project to about 10 miles east of Battle Creek, near Sunrise Heights. Community In July 2001, EPA took over as lead agency for the project at the Involvement Team request of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, which will continue to have a significant role in the appropriate cleanup. The Kalamazoo River Superfund Project runs through two counties in southwestern Michigan: Allegan and Kalamazoo (see the map on page 4). The site includes five disposal areas, six paper mill properties, the Kalamazoo River, a tributary of Lake Michigan that flows northwest, and Portage Creek, a tributary of the Kalamazoo River that flows north. The project includes three miles of Portage Creek from Cork Street to where it joins with the Kalamazoo River; and from this confluence Tea m m em bers may be reached directly by E-mail, by phone at the numbers below, downstream to the Allegan City Dam. Because PCBs have migrated or by calling toll-free (800) 621-8431. downstream, the Superfund remedial investigation includes the area For toll-free calls, to the mouth of the Kalamazoo River at Lake Michigan, about 80 enter the approp riate exten sion at the prom pt.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Natural Resource Impacts G P from the Enbridge Pipeline
    Assessinggp Natural Resource Impacts from the Enbridge Pipeline Spill into the Kalamazoo River Jessica Winter - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Stephanie Millsap, Lisa Williams, and Joseph Haas - U.S. Fish & Wildlife R Todd Williamson - Match-E-Be-Nash- Service She-Wish Tribe of Pottawatomi Sharon Hanshue and Jay Wesley - Douglas Beltman, Allison Ebbets, and Michigan Department of Natural Kaylene Ritter - Stratus Consulting Resources Donald E. Tillitt, Diana Papoulias, and William Taft and Michael Walterhouse Diane Nicks - U.S. Geological Survey - Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Peter Badra - Michigan State University Presentation Outline Natural Reso urce Damage Assessment overview Enbridge oil spill incident description Trustees’ data collection efforts Oil Pollution Act Authorizes Natural Resource Damage Assessment OPA (33 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq.) and NRD Regulations: 15 C.F.R. Part 990 “The goal of OPA is to make the environment and the public whole for injuries to natural resources and serviltifilices resulting from an oil spill into navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.” -15 C.F.R. 990.10 Trustees assess natural resource injuries on behalf of the public There are eight trustees for the Kalamazoo River Oil Spill How NRDA Restores and Protects Trust Resources TtTrustees work kithR with Response Agenc ies and Responsible Parties to: Ensure protection of trust resources during response; Identify and quantify lost resources/services; Implement projects to restore injured resources and their associated
    [Show full text]
  • Unsuuseuracsbe
    S tHw EASTON y 21 (F u TALLMADGE ( Reed Lake l KEENE W GRAND t VERGENNES StHwy 11 o RAPIDS n i l Grand River s Walker East ADA S o t) ) n S y Grand Rapids tHwy 21 Hw A r (Bluewate v GEORGETOWN e Lowell ) Gr iver Grand Rapids and R Forest Saranac BERLIN S Hills Jenison t PORT H BOSTON OLIVE ) w LOWELL BLENDON Dr Grandville y o 3 SHELDON g 7 ca hi ( C B IONIA ( r 1 o 109th Congress of the United States 2 a y 96 w d CASCADE tH Wyoming m S o o Kentwood r A 196 v Morrison Lake 31 e Hudsonville ) KENT (Alden Nash Ave) StHwy 50 Cutlerville 21 wy r) tH o D Clarksville S ag HOLLAND hic (C Zeeland ODESSA PARK OTTAWA Byron CALEDONIA CAMPBELL StHwy GAINES BOWNE ZEELAND Center StHwy 50 Beechwood 21 JAMESTOWN (Thompson Rd) Lake Odessa 9th BYRON St Caledonia 108th St C G Group (Aux Op) Station Holland Lake Macatawa S Jordon Lake t H w 17th St y Freeport 3 DISTRICT 7 Green Lake ( WISCONSIN M MICHIGAN Holland - 3 WOODLAND 7 3 143rd Ave H w y DORR ) CARLTON Woodland SALEM LEIGHTON IRVING 196 Red Run Walnut Ave LAKE- Village Dr 142nd Ave Middleville FILLMORE(LincolnStHwy Rd) 40 OVERISEL TOWN Patterson Rd 18th St THORNAPPLE DISTRICT 136th 2 Ave StHwy 37 Wayland Saugatuck StHwy Douglas 43 Hastings CASTLETON Ka HEATH MONTEREY HOPKINS YANKEE SPRINGS lam S WAYLAND HASTINGS t a 24th St MANLIUS z oo Riv H er w y Thornapple Lake 4 0 Hopkins Gun RUTLAND M-79 Hwy SAUGATUCK Lake Fennville BARRY StHwy 89 (124th Ave) 124th Ave Dumont Rd y Dumont Lake w H BALTIMORE S 3 Hutchins Lake ( tH 4 L - Swan Creek in w c y M Marsh o 4 ln 0 Miner Lake ALLEGAN R Guernsey d M ) Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Watershed Land Conservation Plan
    Kalamazoo River Watershed Land Conservation Plan April 22, 2014 Prepared for: Kalamazoo River Watershed Council & Southwest Michigan Land Conservancy Prepared by: Kyle Alexander, Jamie Jackson, Fumi Kikuyama, Ben Sasamoto, and Alison Stevens of the University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment Abstract: The Kalamazoo River Watershed Land Conservation Plan was developed to select for conservation targets among ownership parcels in the Kalamazoo River Watershed (MI). The watershed, while historically degraded, features large areas of preserved Midwestern habitats. To facilitate for the permanent protection of these lands, this plan was developed using an ArcGIS-based analysis that scored ownership parcels based on the following conservation criteria: land cover, presence of wetlands, proximity to hydrology, proximity to existing conserved lands, presence of cold lands, and presence of threatened and endangered species habitat. These criteria were developed using a literature review of existing conservation plans and Kalamazoo River Watershed stakeholder input. The results from this analysis were used to identify conservation priorities, including: the top 100 scoring parcels in the basin, a database of the top 20% scoring parcels and their contact information, and priority subwatersheds for conservation. Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Tables ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Assessment
    ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��� � STATE OF MICHIGAN � � � � ������� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Kalamazoo River Assessment 2005 DRAFT Jay K. Wesley www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION DRAFT REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Draft January 2005 Kalamazoo River Assessment Jay K. Wesley The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, (1976 MI P.A. 453 and 1976 MI P.A. 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR Office of Legal Services, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909; or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, State of Michigan, Plaza Building, 1200 6th Ave., Detroit, MI 48226 or the Office of Human Resources, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Diversity and Civil Rights Programs, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. 22203. For information or assistance on this publication, contact the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. This publication is available in alternative formats. ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources � � � ��� � � � � Total number of copies printed 200 — Total cost $3,156.27 — Cost per copy $15.78 � ������� DRAFT Kalamazoo River Assessment February 2005 Suggested Citation Format Wesley, Jay K.
    [Show full text]