DOCSLIB.ORG

Torrens Rail Junction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Torrens Rail Junction Torrens Rail Junction National Heritage Impact Assessment DA153199 : Revision A : 09.12.15 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................. 2 1 Scope ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 Project Scope ............................................................................... 3 1.2 Author Identification ....................................................................... 5 1.3 Scope of Assessment ................................................................... 6 2 Heritage Impact Assessment Overview ....................................... 7 3 Heritage Places .......................................................................... 8 3.1 Scope of Listing ............................................................................ 8 3.2 Historic Context ........................................................................... 11 4 Summary of Works That May Result in Potential Impacts ......... 27 5 National Heritage Impact Assessment ...................................... 29 5.1 Criterion A Assessment ............................................................... 30 5.1.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 31 5.2 Criterion B Assessment ............................................................... 32 5.2.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 32 5.3 Criterion D Assessment ............................................................... 32 5.3.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 33 5.4 Criterion F Assessment ................................................................ 34 5.4.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 34 5.5 Criterion G Assessment ............................................................... 35 5.5.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 36 5.6 Criterion H Assessment ............................................................... 37 5.6.1 Potential Heritage Impacts ..................................................... 37 6 National Heritage Impact ‘Self Assessment’ ............................. 38 7 Summary .................................................................................. 40 Appendix A .................................................................................... 41 National Heritage Listing ....................................................................... 41 Adelaide Park Lands and City Layout ................................................ 41 2 National Heritage Impact Assmt : DA153199 : 0 Junction Torrens Rail : Rev 8 Adelaide Park Lands and City Layout ....................................... 42 Summary Statement of Significance ..................................................... 42 Official Values ....................................................................................... 43 Description ........................................................................................... 45 History .................................................................................................. 47 Appendix B .................................................................................... 55 Bibliography ......................................................................................... 55 A 9 .12.15 1 Scope 1.1 Project Scope DASH Architects has been engaged by The Department of Planning Transport & Infrastructure (DPTI) to undertake a National Heritage Impact Assessment of the proposed Torrens Rail Junction Project. This project was summarised (in broad terms) in our project brief provided by the Department as follows: The department is currently in the planning phase for the upgrade of the Torrens Rail Junction; between the River Torrens rail bridge and Chief Street, Brompton. The interstate mainline freight railway crosses the Outer Harbor metropolitan passenger railway at-grade at the existing Torrens Rail Junction, imposing restrictions on rail freight. The project will involve removing the junction by lowering the metropolitan passenger railway below ground level and underneath the interstate mainline railway. Once completed, freight trains up to 1,800 metres (currently restricted to 1,500 metres when coming from the north) will be able to pass through this location without reducing speed, which will provide significant improvements to freight rail productivity. Traffic delays caused by Outer Harbor passenger trains at the existing Park Terrace Bowden level crossing will be eliminated through the continuation of the rail underpass underneath Park Terrace and through to Bowden. The project also includes provision of some temporary rail track works outside of the project corridor.... This assessment is based upon the following documentation: • “Outer Harbor, Torrens Rail Junction Grade Separation, Outer Harbor (Down Track)” Option 2 (by DPTI): - IW089300-ESR-SK-0009 (Rev B, dated 23.06.15): Plan and Profile; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0048 (Rev B, dated 28.07.15): Bowden Station Plan and Profile; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0101 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 1 General Construction; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0102 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 2 General Construction; 3 National Heritage Impact Assmt : DA153199 : 0 Junction Torrens Rail : Rev - IW089300-ESR-SK-0103 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 3 General Construction; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0104 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 4 General Construction; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0105 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 5 General Construction; - IW089300-ESR-SK-0106 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 6 General Construction; A - IW089300-ESR-SK-0107 (Rev A, dated 31.07.15): Construction Staging (Option 5)- Stage 7 General Construction. 9 .12.15 • Concept visualisation (file provided 12 August titled TorrensJunction_v011.mp4); • Torrens Rail Junction Concept Study (by Cox and Outer Space, 17 Sept 2015 Rev C, drawings: - Site Plan; - Station Precinct Plan; - Longitudinal Section Through Station Section A; - Longitudinal Section Through Station Section B and C; - Longitudinal Section Through Station Section D and E; and - 3D massing. • Torrens Rail Junction Construction Noise and Vibration Management Framework (dated 1 Sept 2015, Rev A), by Resonate Acoustics. The Torrens Rail Junction Construction Noise and Vibration Management Framework (CNVMF) prepared by Resonate Acoustics provides the following project description: The Torrens Rail Junction project is the second project planned as part of the separation of freight and passenger rail lines in metropolitan Adelaide, the first being the recently completed Goodwood Rail Junction project. The project will grade separate the Melbourne to Adelaide freight line and the Outer Harbor passenger rail line at the existing crossing point near Bonython Park and will also underground the passenger line beneath Park Terrace and Gibson Street in Bowden. The concept design includes: • creation of a cutting along the alignment of the existing Outer Harbor passenger rail line from just north of the Torrens River Rail Bridge in the Adelaide Parklands to just north of the current Gibson Street level crossing in Bowden; • a rail bridge to allow the Melbourne to Adelaide freight line and Gawler passenger rail line to cross the Outer Harbor line at the existing junction point; • removal of the existing level crossings at Park Terrace and Gibson Street; 4 • creation of a new underground railway station in the Bowden National Heritage Impact Assmt : DA153199 : 0 Junction Torrens Rail : Rev urban development site; and • improved cycling and pedestrian facilities. The rail junction currently creates problems for operation of the freight line in particular, in the form of delays and length restrictions for trains. The project will have a number of significant benefits for the transport network including: • removal of the requirement for freight trains to wait for passenger A trains to pass through the junction, thereby increasing efficiency of movements on the freight line; 9 • increased safety by the removal of the Park Terrace and Gibson .12.15 Street level crossings; • removal of the Park Terrace level crossing improving traffic flows and reducing waiting times on Park Terrace, an important part of Adelaide’s inner ring route; • reduced traffic waiting times at the Hawker Street and Torrens Road level crossings; and • creation of a new passenger railway station at Bowden, which is an important urban development site for Adelaide. It is expected that construction will commence in 2016 and be completed by 2017. During the construction phase, a temporary rail alignment will be established for all three lines, largely on the western side of the existing junction. The key project features, including the temporary rail line proposal, and the surrounding areas are shown on Figure 1. 5 National Heritage Impact Assmt : DA153199 : 0 Junction Torrens Rail : Rev Image 1. Project Overview as included in Resonate Acoustics CNVMF. 1.2 Author Identification This report has been prepared by Jason Schulz B Arch St, B Arch (Hons) FRAIA, Director of DASH Architects. A 9 .12.15 1.3 Scope of Assessment The scope of this report is limited to the potential impact on the non-Aboriginal formally identified National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16131 New Connections 6 Ƒ R.Indd
    ISSUE 6 WINTER 2010 onwards and upwards The Glenelg tramline is realising its potential as part of a rejuvenated public transport network for Adelaide following the realisation of two major milestones on its journey coast to coast. > Gallipoli Underpass see page 7. Project Director, Manuel Delgado said a sense of history came with seeing the fi rst trams run between the city and the Adelaide inside this issue Entertainment Centre. “We had a great response during the Adelaide > coast to coast light rail Entertainment Centre’s open day earlier this year > glenelg tram overpass when more than 2,500 people took the chance to ride on the extended tramline for the fi rst time. > gallipoli underpass “Since the start of timetabled services, on the 22nd > south road superway of March this year, we’ve had a steady increase in patronage and usage of the Park and Ride facility. > northern expressway “We’ve also seen the trams service a big concert like Lady GaGa and Asian Champions League > rail revitalisation football at Hindmarsh Stadium, which is great.” > seaford rail extension see page 6 www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au Winter 2010 1 by Hook contents We’ve all been horrifi ed by deaths rail revitalisation and serious injuries p11 on our roads in gawler the fi rst half of 2010 and we all have a responsibility to address the issue. northern p8-9 Delivering a road safety benefi t is a key strategy expressway behind all of the major projects underway in and around Adelaide. rail revitalisation dry creek Often road safety is among the primary p12 rail car depot motivators for building new or improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Buildings of Metropolitan Adelaide
    AÚ¡ University of Adelaide t4 É .8.'ìt T PUBLIC TRANSPORT BUILDII\GS OF METROPOLTTAN ADELAIDE 1839 - 1990 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning in candidacy for the degree of Master of Architectural Studies by ANDREW KELT (û, r're ¡-\ ., r ¡ r .\ ¡r , i,,' i \ September 1990 ERRATA p.vl Ljne2}oBSERVATIONshouldreadOBSERVATIONS 8 should read Moxham p. 43 footnote Morham facilities p.75 line 2 should read line 19 should read available Labor p.B0 line 7 I-abour should read p. r28 line 8 Omit it read p.134 Iine 9 PerematorilY should PerernPtorilY should read droP p, 158 line L2 group read woulC p.230 line L wold should PROLOGUE SESQUICENTENARY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT The one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the establishment of public transport in South Australia occurred in early 1989, during the research for this thesis. The event passed unnoticed amongst the plethora of more noteworthy public occasions. Chapter 2 of this thesis records that a certain Mr. Sp"y, with his daily vanload of passengers and goods, started the first regular service operating between the City and Port Adelaide. The writer accords full credit to this unsung progenitor of the chain of events portrayed in the following pages, whose humble horse drawn char ò bancs set out on its inaugural joumey, in all probability on 28 January L839. lll ACKNO\ryLEDGMENTS I would like to record my grateful thanks to those who have given me assistance in gathering information for this thesis, and also those who have commented on specific items in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Gordon [PDF 359KB]
    The Federal Redistribution 2011 South Australia • t; Public Suggestion Number 1 Martin Gordon 8 pages 86 Companion Crescent Flynn ACT 2615 [email protected] 02-62589372 The Redistribution Committee for South Australia Dear Members, Redistribution of Federal Electoral Boundaries in South Australia I have a whole of state redistribution proposal for South Australia. The population differences between the 11 existing divisions are not significantly out of kilter with the current average enrolment and tolerances. Comparatively minor changes I suggest are necessary to bring all the divisions within tolerance in 2015. The nature ofthe changes I have proposed are consistent with economics, social and regional community of interests; communications and travel within the divisions; physical features and existing boundaries. I have provided comments in relation to each division and have compiled the changes into a table which demonstrates they are all well within tolerances in 2015. Grey The existing division is slightly below average enrolment at 100,095 electors. It is growing at nearly the state average electors growth over the next four years (4.02% versus 4.09%). I have proposed no change to the boundaries and the projected enrolments for 2015 will remain at 104,118 or 99.39% of projected average enrolment at that time. Both adjoining divisions of Wakefield and Barker are above quota and any changes to their boundaries can be applied to remedy elector shortfalls in other divisions. Barker The existing division is well above quota and its growth rate is also above the state­ wide average (4.41 % versus 4.09%), and shedding several thousand electors to Wakefield between Gawler and the Barossa, the principal localities are Lyndoch and Sandy Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Strategic Planning Committee
    NOTICE of STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Pursuant to the provisions of Section 84(1) of the Local Government Act 1999 TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAYFORD CIVIC CENTRE 10 PLAYFORD BOULEVARD, ELIZABETH ON TUESDAY, 11 JUNE 2019 AT 7:00PM SAM GREEN ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Issue Date: Thursday, 6 June 2019 PRESIDING MEMBER - CR PETER RENTOULIS Mayor Glenn Docherty Cr Akram Arifi Cr Marilyn Baker Cr Stephen Coppins Cr Andrew Craig Cr Veronica Gossink Cr Shirley Halls Cr David Kerrison Cr Clint Marsh Cr Misty Norris Cr Jane Onuzans Cr Dennis Ryan Cr Gay Smallwood-Smith Cr Katrina Stroet Cr Cathy-Jo Tame Strategic Planning Committee Agenda 2 11 June 2019 CITY OF PLAYFORD STRATEGIC PLAN 1. Smart Service Delivery Program This program is about continuing to provide for the Outcomes changing needs and expectations of our diverse community, delivering the services they require. It 1.1 High quality services and amenities means making the most of our community’s existing 1.2 Improved service delivery strengths, talents and diversity, and working smarter to 1.3 Working smarter with our community connect our community with each other to contribute 1.4 Enhanced City presentation, community to overall wellbeing and the economic life of the City. pride and reputation 2. Smart Living Program This program is about Council playing its part to make the City more liveable and connected. As our older Outcomes suburbs age and our population and urban footprint 2.1 Smart development and urban renewal expands, we will find innovative ways to renew and 2.2 Enhanced City presentation, community ‘future proof’ the liveability of our neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Noarlunga Rail Line to Seaford Final Report
    Final Report October 2007 extension of the noarlunga rail line to seaford Final Report This report has been produced by the Policy and Planning Division Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure extension of the noarlunga rail line to seaford EXTENSION OF THE NOARLUNGA RAIL LINE TO SEAFORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Australia’s Strategic Plan is a comprehensive Initial work on a possible extension commenced in statement of what South Australia’s future can be. Its the mid 1970s during the time of the construction of targets aim for a growing and sustainable economy the Lonsdale to Noarlunga Centre rail line, with the and a strong social fabric. most direct route for a rail alignment from Noarlunga Some of these targets are ambitious and are beyond to Seaford being defined during the 1980s. Further the reach of government acting alone. Achieving consideration occurred in the late 1980s during the the targets requires a concerted effort not only from initial structure planning for the urban development the State Government, but also from local at Seaford. This resulted in a transport corridor being government, regional groups, businesses and their reserved within this development. associations, unions, community groups and In March 2005 the Government released the individual South Australians. Strategic Infrastructure Plan for South Australia which This vision for SA’s future requires infrastructure initiated an investigation into the extension of the and a transport system which maximise South Noarlunga rail line to Seaford as part of a suite of Australia’s economic efficiency and the quality infrastructure interventions to encourage the shift to of life of its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Here
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Source: - TRANSIT AUSTRALIA - February 2004, Vol. 59, No. 2 p41 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ People for Public Transport Conference – October 2003 'Missed Opportunities - New Possibilities' in Adelaide 1. Overview Adelaide's transport action group People for Public Transport held its annual conference 'Missed Opportunities - New Possibilities' on Saturday 25 October 2003 at Balyana Conference Centre, Clapham, attracting some notable speakers and considerable interest. The next three pages present a brief overview of the event and highlights of the speakers' comments. The keynote speaker was Dr Paul Mees, a well known public transport advocate from Melbourne, where he teaches transport and land use planning in the urban planning program at the University of Melbourne. He was President of the Public Transport Users Association (Vic) from 1992 to 2001. (See separate panel page 42.) Dr Alan Perkins talked about the benefits of making railway stations centres for the community, with commercial and medium density housing clustered around the stations and noted places where this had not happened. He stressed the importance of urban design and security at stations. Dr Perkins' work has focused on the nexus of urban planning, transport, greenhouse impacts and sustainability, through research and policy development. He is Senior Transport Policy Analyst with the SA Department of Transport and Urban Planning. See below. Mr Roy Arnold, General Manager of TransAdelaide' talked about his vision for the future of Adelaide's suburban rail, including the new trams, to be introduced in 2005. This is summarised on page 42. Mr Nell Smith, General Manager of Swan Transit (Perth) and a director of Torrens Transit in Adelaide, has been deeply involved in the service reviews that have led to the reversal of long term patronage decline in both cities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 DPTI Annual Report
    Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2017-18 Annual Report Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure GPO Box 1533 Adelaide SA 5001 https://dpti.sa.gov.au/ Contact phone number 08 7109 7313 Contact email https://www.dpti.sa.gov.au/contact_us ISSN (PRINT VERSION) 2200-5879 ISSN (ONLINE VERSION) 2202-2015 Date presented to Minister: 28 September 2018 2017-18 ANNUAL REPORT for the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Contents Contents .................................................................................................................... 3 Section A: Reporting required under the Public Sector Act 2009, the Public Sector Regulations 2010 and the Public Finance and Audit Act 1987 ................. 4 Agency purpose or role ..................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 4 Key strategies and their relationship to SA Government objectives ................................... 4 Agency programs and initiatives and their effectiveness and efficiency ............................. 6 Legislation administered by the agency ............................................................................. 8 Organisation of the agency .............................................................................................. 10 Employment opportunity programs .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan
    INNER WEST PRECINCT TRANSPORT AND PARKING PLAN May 2015 AECOM Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan Client: City of Charles Sturt ABN: 42124960161 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 28, 91 King William Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia T +61 8 7223 5400 F +61 8 7223 5499 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 07-May-2015 Quality Information Document Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan Ref p:\603x\60311346\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\final transport plan 2015\transport and parking plan\revised iwptpp 7-5-2015\inner west transport plan revised - 7 may 2015 (final).docx Date 07-May-2015 Prepared Olivia Franco by Reviewed Christian Bode by AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified.
    [Show full text]
  • A Shared Vision for Northern Adelaide We Acknowledge the Aboriginal People As the First Peoples and Nations of South Australia
    A shared vision for Northern Adelaide We acknowledge the Aboriginal people as the first peoples and nations of South Australia. We recognise and respect the Kaurna people’s cultural connections as the traditional owners and occupants of northern Adelaide, and that the Kaurna people have made and continue to make a unique and irreplaceable contribution to the area. Disclaimer No responsibility for any loss or damage caused by reliance on any of the information or advice provided by or on behalf of the State of South Australia, or for any loss or damage arising from acts or omissions made, is accepted by the State of South Australia, their officers, servants or agents. Produced by the Government of South Australia © January 2016. Content correct at time of production. Table of contents Executive summary 6 Supporting the north 8 Vision and objective 12 Consultation 14 Regional profile 16 Imperative for change 26 Strategic direction 30 Measuring progress and success 60 How can you be involved? 64 Additional information and key contacts 66 3 Executive summary The Northern Economic We looked closely at the economic data It builds on recently announced State and asked the community what they want Government initiatives, including Plan is a blueprint for now and into the future. We also asked $93 million in the 2015–16 State Budget, a prosperous northern businesses about their plans in the region. to improve housing, roads and schools in Both groups were optimistic about the northern Adelaide. The State Government Adelaide, focused future, with good reason. has also embarked on the most significant on creating jobs and tax reform in its history in order to create The region is a significant contributor to and maintain jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal 161 Passed at Danger Transadelaide Passenger Trainh307
    ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT Rail Occurrence Investigation 2006/003 Final Signal 161 Passed at Danger TransAdelaide Passenger Train H307 Adelaide, South Australia 28 March 2006 Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 15 Mort Street, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: 1800 621 372; from overseas + 61 2 6274 6590 Accident and serious incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6274 6474; from overseas + 61 2 6274 6474 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2007. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca # ISBN and formal report
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining Adelaide's Public Transport by Andrew Leunig 28 August 2013
    Re-imagining Adelaide's Public Transport By Andrew Leunig 28 August 2013 With some further notes as at 20 March 2015 (at rear) Re-imagining Adelaide's Public Transport Exec Summary I believe that Adelaide could be the most livable and most learning City on the Planet. The “most liveable” city in the world will get the balance between Public and Private transport right. It will be “liveable” for the old and the young, the rich and the poor. Why couldn't Adelaide have the cleverest, most vibrant public transport system for a town of it's size on the planet ? No Reason at all. But we have to want it first. At the moment our Public Transport mode share (9.9%) is about the lowest in Australia and that is our accepted norm. Even our state plan is soft and timid. “Increase the use of public transport to 10% of metropolitan weekday passenger vehicle kilometres travelled by 2018”. I like the old saying "If you shoot for the stars you might not get there ­ but you are less likely to come up with fists full of mud". At the moment our state plan shoots for the mud. The solution ? We need to re­imagine our network design. As recommended by leading experts we should toss out our current hub (city) and spoke design and design our Network around the very layout that Adelaide is globally famous for ­ our grid. I propose that we create The Adelaide Metro Grid ­ with buses running frequently in a straight line along our major roads, where transfers are presumed and every major intersection becomes a transfer point.
    [Show full text]
  • Rftf Final Report.Pdf
    Disclaimer The Rail Freight Task Force Report has been prepared with funding and assistance from Mitcham Council. The Report is the result of collaboration between members of the Rail Freight Task Force and various community representatives and aims to provide an alternative perspective on rail freight through the Adelaide area. The information provided in the Report provides a general overview of the issues surrounding rail freight transport in the Mitcham Council (and/or surrounding) area. The Report is not intended as a panacea for current rail transport problems but offers an informed perspective from the Rail Freight Task Force. Findings and recommendations made in the Report are based on the information sourced and considered by the Rail Freight Task Force during the period of review and should not be relied on without independent verification. Readers are encouraged to utilise all relevant sources of information and should make their own specific enquiries and take any necessary action as appropriate before acting on any information contained in this Report. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................3 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................6 Importance of the Railway System.......................................................................................................6 How Much Freight Moves Through the Adelaide Hills
    [Show full text]