Paul Tudor Jones Has Waded Into the Fray, Bankrolling Underwater Turbines in New York’S East River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paul Tudor Jones Has Waded Into the Fray, Bankrolling Underwater Turbines in New York’S East River As energy prices soar, a motley crew of green- power entrepreneurs is racing to harness the oceans. Billionaire Paul Tudor Jones has waded into the fray, bankrolling underwater turbines in New York’s East River. By Anthony Effinger B l o o m b e r g M a r ke t s J u n e 2 0 0 7 85 Making waves: Dublin-based OpenHydro has installed tidal turbines off the coast of Scotland. Blo o m b e r g M a r ke t s 86 J u n e 2 0 0 7 ‚When the tide rushes into New York Harbor, a strange thing happens at the Gristedes supermarket on Roosevelt Island. The freezers, cash regis- ters—even the red neon “Bagels” sign— hum with electricity from the rip coursing up the East River. • The power comes from six underwater turbines bolted to the river bottom by a little-known startup called Verdant Power LLC. The 7-foot-long blades turn, silent and out of sight, until the flux crests. When the tide turns, How It Works: the contraptions pivot 180 Unlike rivers, tides run in two directions. Rotors on Ver- degrees and make juice on dant’s six tidal turbines are mounted behind generators. the ebb. • Tiny Verdant has The units pivot when the tide turns, aiming their noses a rich and famous partner, into the current. The turbines make power 77 percent of billionaire hedge fund the time, stopping at high and low tide. manager Paul Tudor Jones. His Tudor Invest- ment Corp. has staked $15 million on New York– From New York Harbor to San Fran- there, they’ll get first dibs on federal li- based Verdant, a company cisco Bay, a new breed of green-energy censes. The price of one of these poten- with 20 employees, zero entrepreneurs is warring over the tides, tial golden tickets: $0. the next big thing in alternative power. profit and one very aggres- As oil and natural gas prices climb, he froth is flying. Washing- sive competitor lurking upstarts such as Verdant and rival ton-based Oceana has an- just upstream. Oceana Energy Co. are vying for inves- gered Verdant Power tors’ money and staking executives by seeking a site claims to America’s coastal Tjust north of Verdant’s East waterways. Since 2005, the River turbine farm. Oceana, chaired by U.S. Federal Energy Regula- William Nitze, son of the late NATO ar- tory Commission, which reg- chitect Paul Nitze, has also irked the ulates the energy industry, city of San Francisco by laying claim to has granted Oceana, Verdant the currents that swirl beneath the and six other companies the Golden Gate Bridge. The company has exclusive right to study the applied for a total of 13 study permits tides in 21 locations, from and is trying to use its pull in Washing- the East River in New York ton to steer taxpayer money its way. to the Icy Passage in Alaska. “They’re claim jumpers,” Verdant Power If the companies can figure co-founder William “Trey” Taylor says Paul Tudor Jones is betting on tidal power. out how to make projects pay of his competitor. PREVIOUS PAGE; OPENHYDRO; MICHAEL J.N. BOWLES(2) B l o o m b e r g M a r ke t s J u n e 2 0 0 7 87 Tide Power Gushers? Why the East River: East River, New York Turbines need fast currents, which occur where tides push Golden Gate, California through narrow channels. When the tide rises in New York, Puget Sound, Washington water rushes north up the East River, between Manhattan Columbia River, Oregon and Queens, accelerating to 500 feet per minute. Tides in Canada’s Bay of Fundy, the world’s largest, rip along at Wrangell Narrows, Alaska 800 feet per minute in some places. Icy Passage, Alaska Piscataqua River, Maine Bay of Fundy, Canada Inside a Turbine: The blades on Verdant’s tidal turbines turn slowly—about 32 times a minute. Housed in front of the rotor is a gear- box and a generator. The turbines are designed to detach easily from the bedrock for servicing. Verdant needs to put about 300 turbines in the East River to reach its goal of generating 10 megawatts, enough to light 8,000 homes. Oceana co-founder John Topping says his company has played by the rules. He says the best tidal sites were there for the taking. “Somebody is going to do it, and we racingracing ttoo mmasteraster tthehe ttides.ides. OOnene ooff to catch the wave of money that’s want to be the somebody,” says Topping, Oceana’s consultants helped design a washed over energy startups as the president of the Washington-based Cli- bunker-busting nuclear bomb for the price of oil has tripled during the past mate Institute, which promotes aware- U.S. military. An engineer at Dublin- five years. Costly OPEC crude and con- ness of global warming. based tide power company OpenHydro cern about global warming have ush- The idea that the oceans might yield Group Ltd. used to advise Ferrari SpA. ered in a rich era for green power. an endless supply of pollution-free Another tide entrepreneur built a fast Venture capitalists have invested mil- power has lured an odd cast of charac- boat for Colombian drug smugglers, lions of dollars in solar-energy and ters. Tudor Jones joins a crush of engi- which landed him in prison. geothermal startups. Money managers neers, lawyers and former politicians Tide power proponents are trying such as Tudor Jones are clamoring Oceana Energy has snapped up rights to tide power sites. ‘Somebody is going to do it, and we want to be that somebody,’ says co-founder John Topping. KEVIN HAND (ILLUSTRATION) Blo o m b e r g M a r ke t s 88 J u n e 2 0 0 7 WAR OF THE TIDES Verdant co-founder William Taylor wants to put 300 turbines in New York’s East River to power 8,000 homes in the city. 89 after companies that cook up gasoline substitutes from corn, sugar and soy- beans. Alternative energy stocks have surged the way dot-com shares did in 1999. The 43-stock WilderHill Clean Energy Index has rocketed since its August 2004 debut, rising 62 percent as of April 11. Tudor Jones, 52, has five people evaluating alternative-energy invest- ments at his firm. A fishing enthusiast, he’s chairman of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. He declined to be interviewed for this story. Dan Schiff, an analyst who works in Boston at On New York’s Roosevelt Island, this Greenwich, Con- supermarket gets electricity from six Verdant turbines such as the one on necticut–based the left. Tudor Invest - ment, says his says. “It looks like someone is trying boss is eager to in- to corner the market.” That’s not the vest in green com- case, he says. Oceana needs to study panies, provided lots of sites because many won’t make they pay off for the grade, says Hoover, 29. He got the firm’s inves- interested in tidal energy while at New tors. Tudor Jones’s Orleans–based Tulane University Law flagship Tudor BVI Global Fund Ltd. an Oceana unit applied to FERC for a School, from which he graduated has posted an average annual return of permit to study a swath of the East in 2002. 24 percent since its inception in 1986. River north of Roosevelt Island. The “We’re always interested in deploying stretch is called Hell Gate, for the cur- o far, the reach of tide capital in a green fashion with a good rents that once wrecked sailing ships power enthusiasts far ex- return,” Schiff, 30, says. against hidden rocks. The frigate HMS ceed their grasp. Taylor Tudor Investment is hardly betting Hussar sank there in 1780, with a trove foresees a time when hun- the farm on tide power. The firm man- of gold coins. The treasure has never Sdreds of Verdant turbines ages $16.1 billion and has committed a been found. in the East River will power 8,000 mere $15 million to Verdant. Tudor In- In a filing with FERC in July, Ver- homes in New York. He imagines drop- vestment has also invested in Bermuda- dant lawyer Gilbert Sperling com- ping his machines into rivers and bays based Infinity Bio-Energy Ltd., which pared Oceana with “dot-com exploiters the world over to light houses and of- makes ethanol from sugar in Brazil. who seized domain names and held fices, desalinate water—even pull hy- “We’ve been looking at a lot more of them for ransom.” Oceana plans to drogen from water to provide fuel for these,” says Schiff, who sits on Verdant snap up sites and then sell the rights, green-power cars. Because water is 850 Power’s board. Sperling wrote. times denser than air, a tide mill can The clash between Verdant and “I fully appreciate their position,” generate more energy than a much Oceana started in March 2006, when Oceana General Counsel Mike Hoover larger windmill. Unlike breezes, tides are predictable. That’s Verdant’s vision. Right now, its generators power a grocery store and ‘We’re always interested in deploying charge a few hybrid buses on Roosevelt capital in a green fashion with a good Island, which lies between Manhattan Island and the borough of Queens. The return,’ says Tudor Investment analyst company is still testing its turbines and Dan Schiff. doesn’t collect a dime.
Recommended publications
  • Informing a Tidal Turbine Strike Probability Model Through Characterization of Fish Behavioral Response Using Multibeam Sonar Output
    ORNL/TM-2016-219 Informing a Tidal Turbine Strike Probability Model through Characterization of Fish Behavioral Response using Multibeam Sonar Output Mark Bevelhimer Approved for public release. Jonathan Colby Distribution is unlimited. Mary Ann Adonizio Christine Tomichek Constantin Scherelis July 2016 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via US Department of Energy (DOE) SciTech Connect. Website http://www.osti.gov/scitech/ Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange representatives, and International Nuclear Information System representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn Bridge Park - Case Study
    BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK - CASE STUDY URBAN REGENERATION KSB 1 2 ANNOTATED OUTLINE – BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK - CASE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENT Summary 5 Background 6 The Process 7 Project Outcomes 8 Challenges 9 Lessons Learned 11 Sources 12 URBAN REGENERATION KSB 3 1 SUMMARY PROJECT & LOCATION Brooklyn, New York City, USA LAND-BASED Ongoing operations & maintenance of public ame- FINANCING INSTRUMENT nities funded by PILOT (Payment in lieu of property USED taxes); out-lease of excess government-owned land TOTAL PROJECT COST US$355 million 85-acre (34 hectares) of former industrial waterfront LAND AREA land along 1.3 miles of the Brooklyn side of the East River Creation of an iconic park with resilient, world-class design and construction standards, serving locals and visitors; increase in land value and therefore BENEFITS TO THE CITY property taxes in adjacent neighborhoods; enhance the quality of life in surrounding neighborhoods in the borough; financially self-sustaining (i.e., maintained at no cost to the city) ANNUAL O&M BUDGET US$16 million (2016) In the early 1980s, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) decided to cease all cargo ship operations along Brooklyn’s Piers 1 to 6 due to a decline in use, as cargo was increasingly going to other ports. As a result, the piers became a barren, post-industrial site with little activity. Even so, the area had significant potential for reuse, in part due to its panoramic views of the Manhattan skyline across the East River. In the 1990s, PANYNJ announced plans to sell the land for commercial development.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC.Gov Web Site At
    This page is located on the NYC.gov Web site at http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bridges/miscbridges.shtml Bridges Movable Bridges over Smaller Waterways Mill Basin Bridge, Mill Basin, Brooklyn Roosevelt Island Bridge, East River, Queens-Manhattan Mill Basin Bridge The Mill Basin Bridge is a double leaf trunnion bascule supporting the Belt (Shore) Parkway over Mill Basin in the Borough of Brooklyn. Each leaf carries six lanes of traffic - three in each direction. There is a sidewalk on each side of the leaf. Re-Decking of the Mill Basin Bridge DOT has reconstructed the Belt Parkway Bridge over Mill Basin. The bridge was constructed in 1942 and had outlived its useful service life. Due to the effects of age, weather and increased traffic volume, reconstruction was deemed necessary. The work was substantially completed in December 2006 Mill Basin Bridge Facts Bridge ID Number 2-23147-9 Borough Brooklyn Type Bascule Telephone (718) 388-0860 Location Exits 11 & 12 Belt Pkwy. Waterway Mill Basin Miles from Mouth 0.8 Channels 1 Used by Hwy Total Cost $1,390,000.00 Date Opened Jun. 29, 1940 Roosevelt Island Bridge The Roosevelt Island Bridge is a tower drive, vertical lift, movable bridge across the East Channel of the East River between the borough of Queens and Roosevelt Island, New York City. The span length is 418 feet. It was known as the Welfare Island Bridge when it was first opened to traffic in 1955. The bridge is the only means of vehicular access to Roosevelt Island. Prior to construction, the bridge carried two 17-foot lanes of vehicular traffic and a 6-foot sidewalk.
    [Show full text]
  • New York's Leadership in the Emerging Marine Renewable
    New York’s Leadership in the Emerging Marine Renewable Energy Industry Ron Smith Verdant Power Inc. A new renewable energy industry, marine energy, including tidal and river energy systems, wave energy and ocean thermal energy systems is emerging around the world. Samples of recent headlines from the United Kingdom (UK) periodical “tidal today” include Scotland’s “Pentland Firth marine energy scheme to see investment worth £5B”, and “The Bay of Fundy tides tipped to generate electricity by 2015”. In the 1980’s the New York Power Authority with the US Department of Energy funded the development of a Kinetic Hydropower System (KHPS) at the Applied Sciences Department of New York University (NYU). In 2000, Verdant Power was incorporated to commercialize kinetic hydropower systems, and selected the NYU system for commercial development, and later hired an NYU lead designer, Dean Corren, to head the technology development and commercialization . Since 2002, NYSERDA has awarded Verdant Power eight development awards totaling over $3M to commercialize the KHPS technology at the Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy (RITE) Project in New York City’s East River for potential application around the world. Starting in 2002, the RITE Project has led the development of this industry in North America with an initial installation of a field of six turbines in the spring of 2007 for operational and environmental assessment for an unprecedented technology capability. Verdant completed the Phase 2 demonstration phase of the project this year with significant and positive results. Earlier this year, Verdant Power received approval of its draft commercial license application from the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the world’s first commercial field of up to 30 turbines in the East River.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Transportation
    INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS East River Bridges A $3.14 billion reconstruction program is underway to rehabilitate all four East River crossings. In 2005, these bridges carried some 498,213 vehicles per day. In 2002, working in coordination with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies, the Division implemented enhanced security measures on these bridges. This work is ongoing. BROOKLYN BRIDGE The Brooklyn Bridge carried some 132,210 vehicles per day in 2005. The $547 million reconstruction commenced in 1980 with Contract #1, and will continue with Contract #6, currently in the design phase and scheduled for completion in 2013. This contract will include the rehabilitation of both approaches and ramps, the painting of the entire suspension bridge, as well as the seismic retrofitting of the structural elements that are within the Contract #6 project limits. Engineering Landmark Plaque. (Credit: Russell Holcomb) 1899 Plaque Near the Franklin Truss of the Bridge, Marking the Site of George Washington’s First Presidential Mansion, Franklin House. (Credit: Hany Soliman) Historic Landmark, 1954 Reconstruction, and Two Cities Plaques. (1954 & Cities Credit: Michele N. Vulcan) 44 2006 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT INNOVATIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS The fitting of the remaining bridge elements requiring seismic retrofitting will be carried out under a separate contract by the end of 2013. Work completed on the bridge to date includes reconditioning of the main cables, replacement of the suspenders and cable stays, rehabilitation of the stiffening trusses, and the replacement of the suspended spans deck. The next work scheduled for the bridge is a project to replace the existing travelers with a state of the art technology system.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt Island Astoria
    Neighborhood Map ¯ Ravenswood 35-01 35-01 Ravenswood 35 Avenue 30-02 31 Street 21-01 35-01 Playground Q66 29-02 Houses 35-01 Queens 34-99 12-35 28-12 35 Avenue 25-18 East River 24-02 34-99 Ravenswood 35-01 Greenway Q66 11-01 35 Avenue 35-01 34-99 10-05 12-50 34-99 35-01 9-03 32Street 34-99 35 Avenue 35-01 11-14 Astoria 30Street 29Street 35-01 10-02 28Street 35-01 9-20 35-01 8-02 Ravenswood 35-52 Ravenswood Houses 24 Street Crescent Street Crescent 12 Street Ravenswood Library 35-51 Roosevelt Island Houses Promenade 11 Street Street 21 10 Street 35-99 36 Avenue 35-99 Vernon Blvd 9 Street 35-99 30-11 36 Avenue 29-15 25-35 24-01 35-99 36 Avenue 23-99 35-99 36 Avenue 36-01 30-18 21-01 36-01 29-22 36 Avenue 36-01 28-20 36 Av 14-01 35-99 24-12 23-24 35-99 22-02 36-01 36 Avenue 21-26 36-01 36-01 11-09 14-02 36-01 35-99 36-01 36-01 13-12 10-15 35-99 36-01 12-20 9-15 Pedestrian 36 Avenue Dutch Kills Dutch Kills and bike 8-19 Q100 Playground access 36-01 10-18 St. Rita’s LTD Q100 Q102 Roman Catholic LTD Q102 Roosevelt Island Church Q66 Spirit Playground Q69 Q66 Bridge 36-01 8-16 36 Avenue e Q69 d Bridg Q102 t Islan Dutch Kills Roosevel e School, PS 112 OIiver Wendell Holmes 36 Avenu School, IS 204 Q102 36-69 36-99 36-99 36-99 36-99 21-17 36-99 22-19 36-99 23-17 36-99 24-13 36-69 29-09 30-01 31-19 13-15 37 Avenue William Hallet 36-69 37 Avenue 37 Avenue Public School, 21-04 12-19 22-15 23-12 37-01 24-10 37-01 36-69 25-12 37 Avenue 27-02 37-01 PS 76 Sixteen 37-01 28-10 37-01 30-18 37-01 37-01 31-10 11-17 37-01 36-69 Oaks Grove Social Security 10-15
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 2016-2017: PTDT16D00.E02 2017-2018: PTDT17D00.E02 The preparation of this report has been financed through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. This 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Report was funded through the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council SFY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program project, Data Management PTDT17D00.E02, which was funded through matching grants from the Federal Transit Administration and from the Federal Highway Administration. Title VI Statement The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and all related rules and statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • M&J Statement of Qualifications
    M&J Statement of Qualifications 1 Agenda • Introduction • Construction Management Division • Technology Division • Engineering Division • Q/A 2 Introduction 3 CH2M and M&J MPA CH2M Hill, Inc. and M&J Engineering, P.C. have entered into a Mentor- Protégé Agreement (MPA), which was approved by SBA on July 20th, 2016. Under this MPA, M&J aspires to grow its personnel from 100 to 500, and to diversity, both technically and geographically, its professional services. 4 About M&J Engineering, P.C. 2004 90 inception employees 150+ 1 M + projects completed safe work hours recorded with no accidents $2.175B projects managed 5 Services Construction Management Engineering Design Technology Environmental 6 Services Electrical Engineering Civil Engineering Mechanical Engineering Structural Engineering Technology -- Smart Cities, Transportation, Intelligent Cyber Security Transportation Systems Construction Engineering and Management -- Supervision, Environmental Engineering Management, and Inspection Condition Evaluations Water Resources Engineering Program Management, Project Controls, CPM Scheduling and Industrial/Occupational Hygiene Construction Cost Estimating 7 Office Locations Headquarter Connecticut (Satellite Office) 2003 Jericho Turnpike 1224 Mill Street, Building B, Suite 224 New Hyde Park, NY 11040 East Berlin, CT 06023 New Jersey 100 Challenger Road, Suite 309 Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 New York 495 Freedom Plains Road Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Pennsylvania 705 Thompson Park Drive Cranberry, PA 16066 Washington DC (Satellite Office) 20 F Street,
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Tidal In-Stream Energy Conversion (TISEC)
    Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 6 2008 A Rising Tide in Renewable Energy: The Future of Tidal In-Stream Energy Conversion (TISEC) Michael B. Walsh Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, and the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael B. Walsh, A Rising Tide in Renewable Energy: The Future of Tidal In-Stream Energy Conversion (TISEC), 19 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 193 (2008). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol19/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Walsh: A Rising Tide in Renewable Energy: The Future of Tidal In-Stream 2008] A RISING TIDE IN RENEWABLE ENERGY: THE FUTURE OF TIDAL IN-STREAM ENERGY CONVERSION (TISEG) I. INTRODUCTION The idea of generating energy from moving water has existed for thousands of years.' Hydropower was one of the earliest forms 2 of renewable energy used by mankind. Modern Civilizations' en- 3 ergy needs, however, have increasingly been fulfilled by fossil fuels. This reliance has created severe environmental and sociological problems. 4 These problems, such as global climate change and continuously rising energy prices, will continue to affect the entire is found.5 human race until a practical alternative for fossil fuels 6 Fortunately, such an alternative is not far off. Hydropower is currently the largest source of renewable energy in the United States, creating 90,000 megawatts (MW) of power and accounting 7 for ten percent of the country's generated energy.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–99 Edition) § 116.55
    § 116.55 33 CFR Ch. I (7±1±99 Edition) Expired service life of old bridge llll PART 117ÐDRAWBRIDGE $llll Subtotal llll $llll OPERATION REGULATIONS Share to be borne by the bridge owner llll $llll Subpart AÐGeneral Requirements Contingencies llll $llll Sec. Total llll $llll 117.1 Purpose. Share to be borne by the United States 117.3 Applicability. llll $llll 117.4 Definitions. Contingencies llll $llll 117.5 When the draw shall open. Total llll $llll 117.7 General duties of drawbridge owners and tenders. (d) The Order of Apportionment of 117.9 Delaying opening of a draw. Costs will include the guaranty of 117.11 Unnecessary opening of the draw. costs. 117.15 Signals. 117.17 Signalling for contiguous draw- § 116.55 Appeals. bridges. 117.19 Signalling when two or more vessels (a) Except for the decision to issue an are approaching a drawbridge. Order to Alter, if a complainant dis- 117.21 Signalling for an opened drawbridge. agrees with a recommendation regard- 117.23 Installation of radiotelephones. ing obstruction or eligibility made by a 117.24 Radiotelephone installation identi- fication. District Commander, or the Chief, Of- 117.31 Operation of draw for emergency situ- fice of Bridge Administration, the com- ations. plainant may appeal that decision to 117.33 Closure of draw for natural disasters the Assistant Commandant for Oper- or civil disorders. ations. 117.35 Operations during repair or mainte- (b) The appeal must be submitted in nance. writing to the Assistant Commandant 117.37 Opening or closure of draw for public interest concerns. for Operations, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study - Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy (RITE) Project
    Case Study - Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy (RITE) Project Project Name Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy (RITE) Project Location East River - New York, NY Installed capacity 175 kW (first phase of the project) Technology Type Three-blade, horizontal-axis turbine (Free Flow Turbine) Project Type/Phase Commercial use Year December 2006 Project Description Initiated in 2002, Verdant Power’s Roosevelt Island Tidal Energy (RITE) Project is being operated in New York City’s East River, along the eastern shore of Roosevelt Island. In three phases, the RITE Project will test, demonstrate and deliver commercial electricity from a tidal Free Flow system. The Project is progressing from an initial demonstration array of six Free Flow turbines to a complete arrangement of units that could generate up to 10 MW (~300 turbines), enough to power nearly 8,000 New York homes. A world-first initiative In December 2006, Verdant Power installed its first grid-connected Free Flow turbine at the RITE Project. The remaining turbines to make up the full six-turbine demonstration array were installed by May 2007. This stands as the world’s first grid-connected array of tidal turbines. The RITE Project has also accomplished the following: • ~50 MWh of electricity delivered to customers (world leader); • 7000+ hours of operation (world leader); • Fully bidirectional tidal operation (world first); • FERC allows Verdant Power to test energy delivery from RITE demonstration array with its “Verdant” ruling; • Received overwhelming community support. A key objective of the RITE Project is to test the transmission of electricity from the Free Flow system to end users. To help accomplish this, two end-users on Roosevelt Island agreed to receive electricity generated by the test array of Free Flow turbines installed in the Aquatic Renewable Energy Technologies (Aqua-RET) is an aquatic renewable energy e-learning tool funded by the EU Leonardo Da Vinci Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center
    CLUB DIRECTIONS USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center City View Columbia University Harlem Armory Tennis Center Manhattan Plaza Racquet Club Roosevelt Island Racquet Club Sportime @ Randall’s Island Alley Pond Tennis Center Cunningham Tennis Center New York Tennis Club Queens College Westside Tennis Club at Forest Hills Mill Basin Health & Racquet Club Prospect Park Tennis Center Stadium Tennis Center at Mill Pond Park The Club of Riverdale USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center Flushing Meadows, Queens (718) 760 6200 www.usta.com By Subway: Take the IRT #7 Flushing subway to the Shea Stadium / Willets Point Station. The Tennis Center is about a three-minute walk down the ramp from the station. By Railroad: The Long Island Railroad Port Washington branch departs from Penn Station to the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center (Shea Stadium / Willets Point Station). Contact the railroad for schedule information at (718)217-5477. By Car: From Manhattan: Take the Triborough/Robert F Kennedy Bridge to the Grand Central Parkway (East). Travel approximately three miles until the I-678/RT-25A E/Northern Blvd exit -- toward the Whitestone Bridge (it's exit #9E). Then take the RT-25A E/Northern Blvd ramp toward Shea Stadium. At the exit ramp, make a right onto Stadium Road. Take that road straight until the second stop sign, where you will then take a left. The Tennis Center will be located on your right. From Brooklyn: Take the Jackie Robinson Parkway to the Grand Central Parkway (West). Travel three miles toward the Triboro Bridge, exit at the Flushing Meadows/Corona Park/Tennis Center (it's exit #9P).
    [Show full text]