DOCSLIB.ORG

URPL 912 2011 Workshop Renewable Energy in SW WI Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
URPL 912 2011 Workshop Renewable Energy in SW WI Report Assessing the Renewable Energy Opportunity in Southwest Wisconsin Phase 1 of 3 University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Urban and Regional Planning Department Workshop, Fall 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5 Implementing Renewable Energy Projects for Economic Development in SW WI ...................................... 5 Key Collaborators ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Southwest Badger ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 SW WI Regional Planning Commission ............................................................................................................................ 6 UW-Extension .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 UW-Madison Department of UrBan and Regional Planning ................................................................................... 6 Other stakeholders ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Situation ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Regional Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Geography ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Population ................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Economy ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Income ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Employment ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 The Solution .............................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Innovation ................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Investment ................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Independence ............................................................................................................................................................................. 13 JoB Creation ................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Import SuBstitution ................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Energy 101 ................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Solar ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Transmission of RenewaBle Energy-Jesse Durst ......................................................................................................... 15 Upfront Costs-Jin Park ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 Wind ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Bioenergy ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Best Practices Regionally and Nationwide .................................................................................................................. 26 Program Design/Implementation .................................................................................................................................... 26 Public Involvement .................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Education/Communication ................................................................................................................................................. 27 Energy Efficiency/LEED certified/Net Zero Buildings ............................................................................................. 27 Creative Uses for Energy/By-Products ........................................................................................................................... 28 Creative Partnerships/Business Models ......................................................................................................................... 28 Additional Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 29 Digested Solids ........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Policy Framework .................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Regulated Power ...................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Wind Siting .................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Focus on Energy Incentives Suspended .......................................................................................................................... 33 Other Incentives ........................................................................................................................................................................ 33 AvailaBility of Credit ............................................................................................................................................................... 34 Assessing the Renewable Energy Opportunity in Southwest Wisconsin 3 Policy Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 History and Inventory of Renewable Energy in SW WI ......................................................................................... 34 Inventory of RenewaBle Energy Projects in SW WI ................................................................................................... 36 II. Community Readiness .................................................................................................... 39 Methodology of Our Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 39 First Impressions Visits .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 Focus Groups .............................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Snowball Survey ........................................................................................................................................................................ 39 Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) ............................................................................................................. 40 Public Involvement .................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Business Plan for Washington, D.C
    Natural Gas and its Contribution to a Low Carbon Future Climate Business Plan for Washington, D.C. MARCH 2020 ALTAGAS // NATURAL GAS AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO A LOW CARBON FUTURE Forward Looking Statement This Climate Business Plan, prepared solely for the Company’s operations in the District of Columbia, contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Such statements are based on our current expectations as of the date we filed this business plan, and we do not undertake to update or revise such forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law. Statements contained in this business plan concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, expenditures, recovery of expenditures, future environmental matters, regulatory and legislative proposals, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statement is made and can often be identified by terms and phrases that include “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “continue,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “will,” “potential,” “forecast,” “target,” “guidance,” “outlook” or other similar terminology. The Company believes that it has chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Substitutability of Electricity and Renewable Materials for Fossil Fuels in a Post-Carbon Economy
    Article Substitutability of Electricity and Renewable Materials for Fossil Fuels in a Post-Carbon Economy Antonio García-Olivares Received: 7 September 2015; Accepted: 17 November 2015; Published: 25 November 2015 Academic Editor: Robert Lundmark Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute of Marine Sciences, Ps. Maritim de la Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-932309500 Abstract: A feasible way to avoid the risk of energy decline and combat climate change is to build a 100% renewable global energy mix. However, a globally electrified economy cannot grow much above 12 electric terawatts without putting pressure on the limits of finite mineral reserves. Here we analyze whether 12 TW of electricity and 1 TW of biomass (final) power will be able to fuel a future post-carbon economy that can provide similar services to those of a contemporary economy. Contrarily to some pessimistic expectations, this analysis shows that the principle economic processes can be replaced with sustainable alternatives based on electricity, charcoal, biogas and hydrogen. Furthermore, those services that cannot be replaced are not as crucial so as to cause a return to a pre-industrial society. Even so, land transport and aviation are at the limit of what is sustainable, outdoor work should be reorganized, metal primary production should be based on hydrogen reduction when possible, mineral production should be increasingly based on recycling, the petrochemical industry should shrink to a size of 40%–43% of the 2012 petrochemical sector, i.e., a size similar to that the sector had in 1985–1986, and agriculture may require organic farming methods to be sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wind Coordinating Committee C/O RESOLVE 1255 23Rd Street, Suite 275 Washington, DC 20037
    NuclearRegulatoryCommission Exhibit#-APL000019-00-BD01 Docket#-05200016 Identified:01/26/2012 Admitted:Withdrawn:01/26/2012 Rejected:Stricken: APL000019 10/21/2011 Permitting of Wind Energy Facilities A HANDBOOK REVISED 2002 Prepared by the NWCC Siting Subcommittee August 2002 Acknowledgments Principal Contributors Dick Anderson, California Energy Commission Dick Curry, Curry & Kerlinger, L.L.C. Ed DeMeo, Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Inc. Sam Enfield, Atlantic Renewable Energy Corporation Tom Gray, American Wind Energy Association Larry Hartman, Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Karin Sinclair, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Robert Therkelsen, California Energy Commission Steve Ugoretz, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources NWCC Siting Subcommittee Contributors Don Bain, Jack Cadogan, Bill Fannucchi, Troy Gagliano, Bill Grant, David Herrick, Albert M. Manville, II, Lee Otteni, Brian Parsons, Heather Rhoads-Weaver, John G. White The NWCC Permitting Handbook authors would also like to acknowledge the contributions of those who worked on the first edition of the Permitting Handbook. Don Bain, Hap Boyd, Manny Castillo, Steve Corneli, Alan Davis, Sam Enfield, Walt George, Paul Gipe, Bill Grant, Judy Grau, Rob Harmon, Lauren Ike, Rick Kiester, Eric Knight, Ron Lehr, Don MacIntyre, Karen Matthews, Joe O’Hagen, Randy Swisher and Robert Therkelsen Handbook compilation, editing and review facilitation provided by Gabe Petlin (formerly with RESOLVE) and Susan Savitt Schwartz, Editor NWCC Logo and Handbook Design Leslie Dunlap, LB Stevens Advertising and Design Handbook Layout and Production Susan Sczepanski and Kathleen O’Dell, National Renewable Energy Laboratory The production of this document was supported, in whole or in part by the Midwest Research Institute, National Renewable Energy Laboratory under the Subcontract YAM-9-29210-01 and the Department of Energy under Prime Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State
    energies Review Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State Stephanie Taboada 1,2, Lori Clark 2,3, Jake Lindberg 1,2, David J. Tonjes 2,3,4 and Devinder Mahajan 1,2,* 1 Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Institute of Gas Innovation and Technology, Advanced Energy Research and Technology, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (D.J.T.) 3 Department of Technology and Society, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 4 Waste Data and Analysis Center, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Public attention to climate change challenges our locked-in fossil fuel-dependent energy sector. Natural gas is replacing other fossil fuels in our energy mix. One way to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of fossil natural gas is to replace it with renewable natural gas (RNG). The benefits of utilizing RNG are that it has no climate change impact when combusted and utilized in the same applications as fossil natural gas. RNG can be injected into the gas grid, used as a transportation fuel, or used for heating and electricity generation. Less common applications include utilizing RNG to produce chemicals, such as methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia. The GHG impact should be quantified before committing to RNG. This study quantifies the potential production of biogas (i.e., Citation: Taboada, S.; Clark, L.; the precursor to RNG) and RNG from agricultural and waste sources in New York State (NYS).
    [Show full text]
  • Agstar Industry Directory for On-Farm Biogas Recovery Systems
    Industry Directory for On-Farm Biogas Recovery Systems September INDUSTRY DIRECTORY FOR ON-FARM BIOGAS RECOVERY SYSTEMS The AgSTAR Program produces this Industry Manufacturers/Distributors include entities that Directory to assist livestock producers and ot hers manufacture, distribute, and in some cases, install involved in developing anaerobic digestion systems equipment used in biogas recovery systems, to identify consultants, designers, developers, including covers, engines, tanks, and other system equipment vendors, and other providers of biogas components. energy services. Publishers distribute journals and reports of If you are in the planning stages of a biogas interest to farm owners and ot hers interested in recovery system, we recommend that you use the biogas recovery systems. Industry Directory in combination with the AgSTAR Handbook (which is available on the AgSTAR Universities are educational institutions, including website at www.epa.gov/agstar) as project land grant colleges and uni versities, involved in development tools to begin the initial project developing and demonstrating on-farm biogas planning process to increase the potential for recovery systems and technologies. success. The Directory is not all inclusive. We will update the Commodity Organizations represent the interests Directory regularly as we learn of new businesses in of a specific crop or livestock commodity. the livestock waste market. These updates will be Commodity organizations generally are involved in posted on t he AgSTAR website, along with other marketing or lobbying activities. AgSTAR products. Consultants provide a variety of services related to If you wish to be included in the Directory, go t o biogas recovery systems, including feasibility www.epa.gov/agstar/tools/experts/signup.html.
    [Show full text]
  • GADS Wind Turbine Generation Data Reporting Instructions
    GGAADDSS WWiinndd TTuurrbbiinnee GGeenneerraattiioonn Data Reporting Instructions Effective January 2010 Version 1.1.0 Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 Who Must Report .................................................................................................................... 7 Terms, Definitions, and Equations.......................................................................................... 7 Data Release Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 8 Talk to Us ................................................................................................................................ 8 Section 2 – Data Transmittal and Format .................................................................................. 9 Transmittal .............................................................................................................................. 9 Format ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Wind Generation Data Entry Software ................................................................................. 10 Questions and Comments ..................................................................................................... 10 Section 3 – Plants, Groups, and Sub-Groups ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Carbon Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) from Wood Wastes
    Low-Carbon Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) from Wood Wastes February 2019 Disclaimer This information was prepared by Gas Technology Institute (GTI) for CARB, PG&E, SoCalGas, Northwest Natural, and SMUD. Neither GTI, the members of GTI, the Sponsor(s), nor any person acting on behalf of any of them: a. Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately-owned rights. Inasmuch as this project is experimental in nature, the technical information, results, or conclusions cannot be predicted. Conclusions and analysis of results by GTI represent GTI's opinion based on inferences from measurements and empirical relationships, which inferences and assumptions are not infallible, and with respect to which competent specialists may differ. b. Assumes any liability with respect to the use of, or for any and all damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report; any other use of, or reliance on, this report by any third party is at the third party's sole risk. c. The results within this report relate only to the items tested. d. The statements and conclusions in this Report are those of the contractor and not necessarily those of the California Air Resources Board. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such products.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Natural Gas – Driving Sustainability Goals and Navigating Legal Issues
    Renewable Natural Gas – Driving Sustainability Goals and Navigating Legal Issues David McCullough, Partner Eversheds Sutherland LLP October 30, 2020 © 2020 Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation. This communication is not intended to be, and should not be, relied upon by the recipient in making decisions of a legal nature with respect to the issues discussed herein. The recipient is encouraged to consult independent counsel before making any decisions or taking any action concerning the matters in this communication. This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship between Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP and the recipient. Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP is part of a global legal practice, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities, under Eversheds Sutherland. For a full description of the structure and a list of offices, please visit www.eversheds-sutherland.com. What is Renewable Natural Gas/Biomethane/Biogas? ─ RNG, biomethane and biogas are all terms that relate to the gas (composed primarily of methane) produced from the breakdown of organic material at various locations, including: • Landfills • Wastewater treatment facilities • Dairy, swine, poultry farms and facilities • Food and organic waste collection ─ “Biogas” typically refers to the raw, unprocessed gas that is collected at the source where the breakdown of organic material is occurring. ─ Renewable natural gas (“RNG”), also sometimes referred to as “biomethane”, typically refers to biogas that has been processed and upgraded to pipeline quality specification. This is done through removing a number of the impurities contained in the biogas.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Natural Gas: a Compliance and Voluntary Solution to Lower Greenhouse Gases BLUESOURCE IS…
    Renewable Natural Gas: A Compliance and Voluntary Solution to Lower Greenhouse Gases BLUESOURCE IS… DEVELOPER RETAILER INNOVATOR Largest and most-established carbon Renewable Energy Credits (RECs), Bluesource pioneers new offset developer in North America. Low Carbon Fuel Standard Credits environmental attribute markets, (LFCS) as well as carbon offsets creative commercial structures and 200+ Projects, 20+ Project Types proficient capital deployment. 150+ million tons of greenhouse gas emission reductions SIMPLE & EFFICIENT | UNMATCHED EXPERIENCE | COMPREHENSIVE & COST - EFFECTIVE | QUALIFIED Bluesource has been voted Best Project Developer and Best Offset Originator 4 years running by Environmental Finance. Salt Lake City San Francisco Calgary Toronto BLUESOURCE PROJECT PORTFOLIO 25+ RNG plants we pair to Voluntary Buyers, Green Tariff Utilities, Transportation End Use 3 BLUESOURCE RNG TEAM ▪ 4 hub offices: Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Calgary, and Toronto ▪ 43 employees Will Overly Lizzie Aldrich ▪ 10 employees on the RNG team Vice President Vice President of Business ▪ Will Overly- US RNG Business Unit Leader Development ▪ Sarah Johnson- US RNG director ▪ Chelle Davidson- RNG Compliance Manager ▪ Lizzie Aldrich- Ag Methane & LCFS specialist ▪ Justin Friesen- Registration & Implementation Sarah Johnson Chelle Davidson ▪ Courtney Messer- RNG Analyst Director of RNG Projects RNG Compliance Manager ▪ Jamie MacKinnon- Canadian RNG Leader ▪ Kevin Townsend- Offset, RIN & LCFS Sales ▪ Ben Massie- Offset, RIN & LCFS Sales ▪ Matt Harmer- Internal
    [Show full text]
  • A GIS-Driven Approach to Siting a Prospective Wind Farm in South
    A GIS-driven approach to Siting a Prospective Wind Farm in South Central Wisconsin Geography 565: Fall 2010 Colleen Crill Wes Gillman James Malaney Tyler Stenz 2 Abstract: There is a growing need for renewable energy sources in South Central Wisconsin, one that could be met by installing a wind farm in the area. We used a GIS to analyze a variety of criteria and determine the most suitable location for a wind farm in the nine county study area. Based on this research, we concluded that a location in Northwest Rock County is the best possible location to site a wind farm. This conclusion provides valuable base research for a company looking to take advantage of the growing market for renewable energy in South Central Wisconsin. INTRODUCTION Windmills have been in use around the world for hundreds of years, but it is not until recently that they have been widely developed as a reliable power source for large populations. The large-scale implementation of this technology began in the 1970’s and has been rapidly expanding since. The state of Wisconsin has already taken advantage of this energy production strategy with nine established wind farms, and with plans to expand further (RENEW WI 2009). Determining the best location for new farms requires analysis of local wind speeds, elevation, land cover and proximity to existing electrical grids. Our research will utilize a GIS to analyze these factors to determine the most optimal turbine locations in South Central Wisconsin (Fig 1). Figure 1. Our study area in South Central Wisconsin Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Impacts to Raptors (PDF)
    To: John Ford, Director From: Bob Roy County of Humboldt Planning and Building Stantec Consulting Department 30 Park Drive 3015 H Street Topsham, ME 04222 Eureka, California 95501 [email protected] Date: August 23, 2019 Reference: Operational Impacts to Raptors Humboldt Wind has commissioned Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to review the draft EIR for the Humboldt Wind Project and provide a re-evaluation of the DEIR’s analysis of potential impacts to raptors. WEST is a firm that is expert in conducting ecological studies and analyzing complicated natural resource data. The attached memo provides WEST’s recommended analysis of the likely impacts of the project on raptors. As noted in WEST’s memo, the DEIR appears to overestimate what the likely impacts of the project will be on local and regional raptor populations. The DEIR reviews several data sets but does not set an explicit expectation of what the project’s likely impact will be. Rather, it reviews a range of potential impacts using different datasets and metrics, and then concludes that impacts will be significant and unavoidable after mitigation. However, WEST’s analysis provides compelling evidence that the DEIR’s analysis is flawed and that actual impacts at the project are likely to be significantly less than that stated in the DEIR and would not lead to local or regional populations of raptor species to fall below self-sustaining levels. Key to this analysis, or the difference between the two analyses, is that raptor impacts at the Humboldt project would not be similar to those documented at projects in central and southern California (where raptor use is far greater than at the project) and the fact that raptor use at the project site is very similar to that documented at Hatchet Ridge, where raptor fatalities have been found to be very low after three years of post-construction monitoring.
    [Show full text]