Reviewed by Lee Macdonald

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Reviews In addition to being a historian of as- The Haunted Observatory tronomy, with many papers published in this Journal, Richard Baum is a former Di- rector of the BAA Mercury and Venus Sec- Curiosities from the astronomer’s cabinet tion and is a renowned visual observer of the planets. His experience as an observer by Richard Baum astronomers whose work is described in is evident throughout the book. For exam- each essay. ple, when discussing nineteenth-century ob- Prometheus Books, New York, 2007. There are four new chapters – on strange servations of Venus, he demonstrates that ISBN 9781-59102-512-2. Pp 416, appearances of Venus, possible nineteenth- although the interpretations of detached £19.99 (hbk) century sightings of near-Earth objects, mov- spots on Venus as high mountains have ing objects seen near the Sun and a possible turned out to be fanciful, these early ob- The Haunted Observatory is a collection explanation of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s servers were honestly recording what they of essays on unexplained or erroneous ob- lines about ‘The hornéd Moon, with one saw. Modern observers see detail on Venus servations of the planets and other Solar bright Star / Almost atween the tips’. Each similar to that recorded by their forebears, System bodies by astronomers of the chapter is meticulously documented with and spacecraft discoveries have shown that past, mostly in the nineteenth and early many bibliographical ref- the features seen may twentieth centuries. Seven of its chap- erences, presented as well have been real de- ters were originally published in 1973 in endnotes at the rear of the tail in Venus’ clouds. The Planets: Some Myths and Realities volume, some of which are I greatly enjoyed The by the same author, but at around twice essays in their own right. Haunted Observatory. I the length of the original work, this is much For example, in the chap- recommend it to anyone more than a new edition. The essays from ter on Schröter’s observa- with an interest in the the old volume, covering subjects from tions of Venus, we learn history of Solar System searches for a satellite of the Moon to a in an endnote of the sad astronomy, and also to suspected planet beyond Neptune, have fate of his observatory, a the modern planetary been revised and expanded so extensively victim of Napoleon’s ar- observer, who will find as to have been effectively rewritten. For mies. Both the main text in its pages much fasci- example, we now learn that a body that and the endnotes are writ- nating reading and valu- was wrongly recorded as a new planet in ten at a level accessible to able instruction. 1831 was used by John Couch Adams to general readers and schol- Lee Macdonald predict the position of his supposed ars alike. There are also trans-Uranian planet, greatly reducing the many illustrations, includ- Lee Macdonald has observed accuracy of his prediction and so slowing ing a central section of col- the planets and the deep sky down James Challis’ hunt for Neptune our plates. The text is visually for many years. He is by giving him a much larger field to search. very accurate, and the very currently doing postgraduate Baum also enlivens his narratives with few errors are all merely work in the history of science colourful mini-biographies of the various typographical. at Cambridge University. 104 J. Br. Astron. Assoc. 118, 2, 2008.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Maxwell and the Rings of Saturn
newsletter OF THE James Clerk Maxwell Foundation Issue No.5 Spring 2 015 Maxwell a nd t he Rings of Saturn by Professor Andrew Whitaker, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Queen’s University, Belfast Le Verrier, or to be worthy of the credit bestowed on him by Britain and, in particular, Cambridge. The funds for the Adams Prize were A view of the rings of Saturn (from Gribbin, John and provided by alumni of Adams’ Cambridge Goodwin, Simon (1998). Empire of the Sun: Planets college, St. John’s, and the prize was in and Moons of the Solar System. Constable, London.) the gift of the University. Airy and Challis were heavily involved in choosing topics Maxwell considered the rings of Saturn Against this background, why was in the first few years of the prize, and in to be ‘ the most remarkable bodies in the Maxwell prepared to put in so much work Maxwell’s year William Thomson was heavens ’, second only, in his opinion, to over several years on the rings of Saturn? also an examiner. Thomson, later Lord the spiral nebulae. Yet it seems extremely Admittedly the prize was substantial – Kelvin, had, of course, been Professor of unlikely that he would have devoted £130, or perhaps £13,000 in today’s terms, Natural Philosophy at Glasgow University a substantial amount of time and and this was rather more than a third of since 1846, but retained very strong links effort to determining their structure his full year’s salary at Aberdeen. But it is with Cambridge throughout his career. mathematically had the topic not been more likely that the reasons for taking Thus the institution of the Adams Prize chosen in 1855 as the subject of the on the challenge were, firstly, personal and the quality of the prize-winning Adams Prize of 1856.
[Show full text]
James Clerk Maxwell
James Clerk Maxwell JAMES CLERK MAXWELL Perspectives on his Life and Work Edited by raymond flood mark mccartney and andrew whitaker 3 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries c Oxford University Press 2014 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2014 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2013942195 ISBN 978–0–19–966437–5 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
[Show full text]
“The Cloud of Unseeing”: Myths Transformed and Pseudo-Scientific
Journal of Tolkien Research Volume 6 | Issue 2 Article 4 2018 “The loudC of Unseeing”: Myths Transformed and Pseudo-scientific nI terpretations of the Book of Genesis Kristine Larsen Central Connecticut State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Larsen, Kristine (2018) "“The loudC of Unseeing”: Myths Transformed and Pseudo-scientific nI terpretations of the Book of Genesis," Journal of Tolkien Research: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch/vol6/iss2/4 This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Services at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Tolkien Research by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Larsen: “The Cloud of Unseeing” 1 Note: This paper was delivered at the Tolkien Seminar, Kalamazoo, MI, on May 9, 2018. The referenced handout is reproduced as an appendix at the end. As more than one astute reader of The Silmarillion has mused, how could life – especially plant life – exist in Middle-earth before the creation of the Sun and Moon? After all, in those early days in Arda after the destruction of the Two Lamps, the Two Trees – the progenitors of the Sun and Moon – only lit the Blessed Lands. Tolkien himself was troubled by these scientific inconsistencies, going back at least as far as 1948. That year he loaned to Katherine Farrer a copy of a radical, experimental version of his creation myth termed by Christopher Ainulindalë C* (called the “Round World Version” by Tolkien) (MR 39).
[Show full text]
The Contrivance of Neptune Downloaded from by DESY-Zentralbibliothek User on 27 November 2019
NEPTUNE The contrivance of Neptune Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article-abstract/57/5/5.28/2738843 by DESY-Zentralbibliothek user on 27 November 2019 Davor Krajnović looks back 170 mid-19th century was, however, very dif- ferent from now. State observatories were years to the planetary discovery not research institutes in the present sense, that startled the world – an but primarily factories producing useful interplay of scientific triumph data, from time-keeping to charting the and human weakness. skies. The use of the observatory tele- scopes was at the discretion of the director and, as an assistant, Galle “ e planète, dont vous avez had to ask for permission to observe signalé la position, réellement for his own private research. Lexiste.” This is the opening The director of the Berlin sentence of an extraordinary letter Observatory, Encke, was aware sent by Johann Gottfried Galle from of Le Verrier’s theory that a more the Berlin Observatory to Jean Joseph distant planet perturbs the motion Urbain Le Verrier on 25 September of Uranus, and did not think much 1846: “The planet whose position you of it. But when Galle approached him predicted really exists.” One can only with the letter, he agreed that it presented imagine the emotions of Galle while a “moral commitment” to Galle to look writing it, or those of Le Verrier reading for the planet. The standard story (e.g. it three days later in Paris. This sentence Turner 1911, Grosser 1962, Standage 2000) announced the most remarkable confir- 1 This 2002 Hubble image of Neptune shows it in is that Encke reluctantly gave permission mation of a theoretical prediction in the detail unimaginable to the 19th-century scientists to Galle to observe that night, but Galle’s history of science.
[Show full text]
John Couch Adams: Mathematical Astronomer, College Friend Of
John Couch Adams: mathematical astronomer, rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org college friend of George Gabriel Stokes and promotor Research of women in astronomy Davor Krajnovic´1 Article submitted to journal 1Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany Subject Areas: xxxxx, xxxxx, xxxx John Couch Adams predicted the location of Neptune in the sky, calculated the expectation of the change in Keywords: the mean motion of the Moon due to the Earth’s pull, xxxx, xxxx, xxxx and determined the origin and the orbit of the Leonids meteor shower which had puzzled astronomers for almost a thousand years. With his achievements Author for correspondence: Adams can be compared with his good friend George Davor Krajnovic´ Stokes. Not only were they born in the same year, e-mail: [email protected] but were also both senior wranglers, received the Smith’s Prizes and Copley medals, lived, thought and researched at Pembroke College, and shared an appreciation of Newton. On the other hand, Adams’ prediction of Neptune’s location had absolutely no inﬂuence on its discovery in Berlin. His lunar theory did not offer a physical explanation for the Moon’s motion. The origin of the Leonids was explained by others before him. Adams refused a knighthood and an appointment as Astronomer Royal. He was reluctant and slow to publish, but loved to derive the values of logarithms to 263 decimal places. The maths and calculations at which he so excelled mark one of the high points of celestial mechanics, but are rarely taught nowadays in undergraduate courses.
[Show full text]
American Astronomer
Past, present, future- it is all in the sky Galileo Galilei(1564-1642) Physicist Mathematician Astronomer Philosopher Galileo Galilei Galileo was also named „the father of modern observational astronomy” , „the father of modern physics” , „the father of science” and „the father of modern science” Stephen Hawking said about him that he was responsible for the birth of modern science Galileo has also worked in applied science and technology, improving compass construction techniques. Galileo improved the telescopes The discovery of the satellites of the planet Jupiter One day while Galileo is looking at the planet Venus, using a telescope, he noticed 3 fixed, almost invisible stars. After a period of study, he realized that the stars orbit the planet. After a while he noticed the 4th star that Galileo called the Medici Stars. Today the stars are called the Galilean Satellites The study of Saturn's rings Galileo Galilei was the first to notice Saturn's rings. Initially he was believed that the rings were two celestial bodies. Repeated studies gave the astronomer a headache. However, he failed to identify them exactly. The study about the moon After the discovery of the largest satellites of Jupiter, he observed a series of special elements about the moon. He discovers the phenomenon of libration. Then, he guesses that there are mountains and craters on the moon, aș a result of the shadows he sees. The „discover” of Neptun After observing the Milky Way, Galileo looks through the telescope and unknowingly observes the planet Neptune. Without knowing it, he discovered a new planet. The heliocentric theory Most of Galileo's astronomical theories confirmed the heliocentric theory that the Earth and other planets spin around the Sun.
[Show full text]
Tremoring Transits: Railways, the Royal Observatory and the Capitalist Challenge to Victorian Astronomical Science
BJHS 53(1): 1–24, March 2020. © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0007087419000529 First published online 11 October 2019 Tremoring transits: railways, the Royal Observatory and the capitalist challenge to Victorian astronomical science EDWARD J. GILLIN* Abstract. Britain’s nineteenth-century railway companies traditionally play a central role in histories of the spread of standard Greenwich time. This relationship at once seems to embody a productive relationship between science and capitalism, with regulated time essential to the formation of a disciplined industrial economy. In this narrative, it is not the state, but capitalistic private commerce which fashioned a national time system. However, as this article demonstrates, the collaboration between railway companies and the Royal Greenwich Observatory was far from harmonious. While railways did employ the accurate time the obser- vatory provided, they were also more than happy to compromise the astronomical institution’s ability to take the accurate celestial observations that such time depended on. Observing astro- nomical transits required the use of troughs of mercury to reﬂect images of stars, but the con- struction of a railway too near to the observatory threatened to cause vibrations which would make such readings impossible. Through debates over proposed railway lines near the observa- tory, it becomes clear how important government protection from private interests was to pre- serving astronomical standards.
[Show full text]
Historical & Cultural Astronomy
Historical & Cultural Astronomy Series Editors: WAYNE ORCHISTON, University of Southern Queensland, Australia ([email protected]) MARC ROTHENBERG, Smithsonian Institution (retired), USA ([email protected]) CLIFFORD CUNNINGHAM, University of Southern Queensland, Australia ([email protected]) Editorial Board: JAMES EVANS, University of Puget Sound, USA MILLER GOSS, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, USA DUANE HAMACHER, Monash University, Australia JAMES LEQUEUX, Observatoire de Paris, France SIMON MITTON, St. Edmund’s College Cambridge University, UK CLIVE RUGGLES, University of Leicester, UK VIRGINIA TRIMBLE, University of California Irvine, USA GUDRUN WOLFSCHMIDT, Institute for History of Science and Technology, Germany TRUDY E. BELL, Sky & Telescope, USA More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15156 Editor-in-Chief William Sheehan Trudy E. Bell • Carolyn Kennett • Robert W. Smith Editors Neptune: From Grand Discovery to a World Revealed Essays on the 200th Anniversary of the Birth of John Couch Adams Editor-in-Chief William Sheehan Independent Scholar Flagstaff, AZ, USA Editors Trudy E. Bell Carolyn Kennett Sky & Telescope Independent Scholar Lakewood, OH, USA Helston, Cornwall, UK Robert W. Smith Department of History and Classics University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada ISSN 2509-310X ISSN 2509-3118 (electronic) Historical & Cultural Astronomy ISBN 978-3-030-54217-7 ISBN 978-3-030-54218-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
[Show full text]
The Giant of Gravel Hill a Poem with Slides Delivered to The
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo The Giant of Gravel Hill A poem with slides delivered to the Cambridge Astronomical Association by Mark Hurn (Departmental Librarian, Institute of Astronomy) on Friday 13 December 2013. In celebration of 175 years of the Northumberland Telescope (1838-2013). 1 I am the giant of Gravel Hill I hope you have some time to kill I have a tale about the past to tell, So listen up and listen well. For many long year the hill was bare, Until astronomers built something there. It was in the year 1823 SLIDE That Cambridge built an observatory Old Tom Plume’s money paid the bills [Thomas Plume 1630-1704] He left them with the best of wills The astronomers left the smoky city And found this hill in fields right pretty The observatory had a house each end, One for the Prof, one for his friend. Along one side the ‘scopes peeped out To see the stars and roundabout! The other side a library started For all the books they had collected Some were old and some were dusty Some were very, very musty! And on the top there was a dome Where a 4 inch telescope had its home An architect, John Mead by name Designed it all to win his fame The astronomers were rather happy, But just one thing was rather crappy All the telescopes were rather small And hardly saw the stars at all! What they needed was a bigger lens SLIDE A bigger one than all their friends A great big object glass was what they sought And in Paree, there was one to be bought The glass from Cauchoix’s workshop came Around by that old River Seine Across it was eleven inches, plus a bit And for Cambridge that would do the trick But who could stump up that much cash? But a nobleman to cut a dash Of Northumberland he was the Duke [Hugh Percy 3rd Duke 1785-1847 devt.
[Show full text]
Tremoring Transits: Railways, the Royal Observatory and the Capitalist Challenge to Victorian Astronomical Science
BJHS 53(1): 1–24, March 2020. © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0007087419000529 First published online 11 October 2019 Tremoring transits: railways, the Royal Observatory and the capitalist challenge to Victorian astronomical science EDWARD J. GILLIN* Abstract. Britain’s nineteenth-century railway companies traditionally play a central role in histories of the spread of standard Greenwich time. This relationship at once seems to embody a productive relationship between science and capitalism, with regulated time essential to the formation of a disciplined industrial economy. In this narrative, it is not the state, but capitalistic private commerce which fashioned a national time system. However, as this article demonstrates, the collaboration between railway companies and the Royal Greenwich Observatory was far from harmonious. While railways did employ the accurate time the obser- vatory provided, they were also more than happy to compromise the astronomical institution’s ability to take the accurate celestial observations that such time depended on. Observing astro- nomical transits required the use of troughs of mercury to reﬂect images of stars, but the con- struction of a railway too near to the observatory threatened to cause vibrations which would make such readings impossible. Through debates over proposed railway lines near the observa- tory, it becomes clear how important government protection from private interests was to pre- serving astronomical standards.
[Show full text]
Tale-Of-Two-Vectors-Published.Pdf
dialectica dialectica Vol. 63, N° 4 (2009), pp. 397–431 DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01207.x A Tale of Two Vectorsdltc_1207 397..432 Marc Lange† Abstract Why (according to classical physics) do forces compose according to the parallelogram of forces? This question has been controversial; it is one episode in a longstanding, fundamental dispute regarding which facts are not to be explained dynamically. If the parallelogram law is explained statically, then the laws of statics are separate from and (in an important sense) “transcend” the laws of dynamics. Alternatively, if the parallelogram law is explained dynami- cally, then statical laws become mere corollaries to the dynamical laws. I shall attempt to trace the history of this controversy in order to identify what it would be for one or the other of these rival views to be correct. I shall argue that various familiar accounts of natural law (Lewis’s Best System Account, laws as contingent relations among universals, and scientific essentialism) not only make it difficult to see what the point of this dispute could have been, but also improperly foreclose some serious scientific options. I will sketch an alternative account of laws (including what their necessity amounts to and what it would be for certain laws to “transcend” others) that helps us to understand what this dispute was all about. 1. A forgotten controversy in the foundations of classical physics Today’s classical physics textbooks tell us without ceremony that forces, as vectors (i.e. directed quantities), combine by “vector addition”. A force applied at a point can be represented by an arrow from that point in the force’s direction with a length proportional to the force’s magnitude (see figure 1a).
[Show full text]
Robert Smith (1689-1768) and His Prizes at Cambridge University June Barrow-Green
This article was downloaded by: [University of Edinburgh] On: 15 April 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 917677783] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Annals of Science Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713692742 'A Corrective to the Spirit of too Exclusively Pure Mathematics': Robert Smith (1689-1768) and his Prizes at Cambridge University June Barrow-Green To cite this Article Barrow-Green, June(1999) ''A Corrective to the Spirit of too Exclusively Pure Mathematics': Robert Smith (1689-1768) and his Prizes at Cambridge University', Annals of Science, 56: 3, 271 — 316 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/000337999296418 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000337999296418 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
[Show full text]