DOCSLIB.ORG

United Republic of Tanzania Vice President’S Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Republic of Tanzania Vice President’S Office THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) 2015 - 2020 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT OCTOBER, 2015 Published by the Vice President's Office, Division of Environment, United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es salaam 2015 Copyright © 2015, Division of Environment, Vice President's Office, URT ISBN: 978 - 9987- 807- 01- 7 This publication may be reproduced for educational or non- profit purposes without special permission from the copy right holders provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Vice President's Office would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. For further information, please contact: Division of Environment, Vice President's Office, P.O BOX 5380, Dar es Salaam. TANZANIA. Phone: +255-222-2113857/2116995 Fax: +255-22-211113856/2113082 E-mail: [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. iv LIST OF PLATES .................................................................................................................................v PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................................. vii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. xi CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Value of Biodiversity to Tanzania .................................................................. 1 1.2 Biodiversity Conservation Initiatives ..................................................................... 2 1.3 Rationale ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Scope and Objectives of the NBSAP ................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Scope of the NBSAP ................................................................................ 3 1.4.2 Objectives of the NBSAP ......................................................................... 3 1.5 Preparation Process of the Revised NBSAP ........................................................ 4 1.6 Structure of the NBSAP 2015 - 2020 ................................................................... 5 CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................................. 6 LOCATION, CLIMATE AND PHYSICAL FEATURES.................................................................. 6 2.1 Location .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Climate .............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Physical Features ................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Agro-climatic Zones ............................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................................... 11 BIODIVERSITY STATUS AND TRENDS .................................................................................... 11 3.1 Ecosystem Status .............................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Terrestrial ecosystems ........................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Coastal and marine ecosystems ............................................................ 12 3.1.3 Freshwater Ecosystems ......................................................................... 13 3.2 Species Diversity ............................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Overall species diversity ......................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Endemic species .................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Threatened and endangered species ..................................................... 15 3.3 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................... 17 3.4 Protected Areas ................................................................................................. 18 3.4.1 Terrestrial Protected Areas .................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Marine Protected Areas .......................................................................... 22 3.5 Trends in the Status of Biodiversity .................................................................... 24 3.5.1 Positive Trends ...................................................................................... 24 3.5.2 Regressive Trends ................................................................................. 26 3.6 Initiatives to Support Biodiversity Conservation ................................................. 30 3.7 Financing Mechanism for Biodiversity Conservation .......................................... 34 3.7.1 Internal mechanisms ............................................................................... 34 3.7.2 External Mechanisms .............................................................................. 35 3.7.3 Incentives for Conservation ..................................................................... 35 3.8 Lessons learnt from the NBSAP 2001 ................................................................ 36 CHAPTER FOUR .............................................................................................................................. 41 THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY ..................................................................................................... 41 4.1 Main Threats ...................................................................................................... 41 4.1.1 Habitat loss and degradation .................................................................. 41 4.1.2 Overexploitation of plant and animal species ......................................... 43 ii 4.1.3 Pollution ................................................................................................. 44 4.1.4 Introduction of Invasive Alien species ..................................................... 45 4.1.5 Oil and gas exploration and extraction ................................................... 46 4.1.6 Genetic erosion ...................................................................................... 47 4.2 Underlying Causes ............................................................................................ 47 4.2.1 Socio-economic and cultural environment causes .................................. 47 4.2.2 Climate change associated causes ........................................................ 50 4.2.3 Inadequate Policy, Legal and Institutional Response ............................. 51 4.3 Impacts of Changes In Biodiversity .................................................................... 53 4.3.1 Impacts on ecological environment ........................................................ 53 4.3.2 Impacts on human well-being ................................................................. 53 CHAPTER FIVE ................................................................................................................................ 55 POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK......................................................... 55 5.1 Policies ............................................................................................................ 55 5.2 Legislation ......................................................................................................... 60 5.3 Other Supporting Documents ............................................................................ 64 5.4 Institutional Arrangement ................................................................................... 65 5.5 Regional and International Cooperation Related to Biodiversity Conservation ... 67 CHAPTER SIX ................................................................................................................................... 72 THE STRATEGY: PRINCIPLES, GOALS AND TARGETS ........................................................ 72 6.1 Vision ............................................................................................................ 72 6.2 Mission ............................................................................................................ 72 6.3 Principles Governing the Strategy ...................................................................... 72 6.4 Strategic Goals .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of the Evolutionary Relationship and Geographical Patterns of Genetically Varied Populations of Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella (L.)
    Analysis of the evolutionary relationship and geographical patterns of genetically varied populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) by Shijun You MSc., The University of British Columbia, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Botany) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2017 © Shijun You, 2017 Abstract The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella, is well known for its extensive adaptation and distribution, high level of genetic variation and polymorphism, and strong resistance to a broad range of synthetic insecticides. Although understanding of the P. xylostella biology and ecology has been considerably improved, knowledge on the genetic basis of these traits remains surprisingly limited. Based on data generated by different sets of molecular markers, we uncovered the history of evolutionary origin and regional dispersal, identified the patterns of genetic diversity and variation, characterized the demographic history, and revealed natural and human-aided factors that are potentially responsible for contemporary distribution of P. xylostella. These findings rewrite our understanding of this exceptional system, revealing that South America might be a potential origin of P. xylostella, and recently colonized across most parts of the world resulting possibly from intensified human activities. With the data from selected continents, we demonstrated signatures of localized selection associated with environmental adaptation and insecticide resistance of P. xylostella. This work brings us to a better understanding of the regional movement and genetic bases on rapid adaptation and development of agrochemical resistance, and provides a solid foundation for better monitoring and management of this worldwide herbivore and forecast of regional pest status of P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fishery of Portunus Pelagicus and Species Diversity of Portunid
    Western Indian Ocean J. Mar.FISHERY Sci. Vol.OF PORTUNUS 2, No. 1, pp.PELAGICUS 75–84, 2003 IN DAR ES SALAAM 75 © 2003 WIOMSA TheFisheryofPortunuspelagicusandSpeciesDiversityof PortunidCrabsalongtheCoastofDaresSalaam,Tanzania A.I.Chande1andY.D.Mgaya2 1Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute, P.O. Box 9750, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2Faculty of Aquatic Sciences and Technology, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Key words: Portunid crabs, production, species diversity, habitat preference Abstract—Production, habitat preference and distribution of the blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus and the diversity of portunid crabs were studied along the Dar es Salaam coastline, Tanzania. Samples were obtained from beach seine nettings and basket traps. The samples from basket traps were used in habitat preference studies only. The production of Portunus pelagicus was assessed in terms of catch rate and biomass, and the biomass and contribution of recruits to the stock estimated using the Leslie method. Seasonal variations in catch rate were found, with peaks between December and May. The highest catch rate was recorded at Msasani Bay (2.24 kg/haul/100-m net), and the lowest at Mzinga Creek (1.08 kg/haul/100-m net). The harvestable biomass for Dar es Salaam coast on average was 34.5 tonnes/year, while the contribution of recruitment to the biomass was about 20.2 tonnes/year. Portunus pelagicus was the most abundant portunid in all the sites, comprising between 39.1 and 81.5% of the catches at Mzinga Creek and Kunduchi respectively. Charybdis anisodon, Scylla serrata and Portunus sanguinolentus were also found in various proportions at the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Diadegma Insulare Or Microplitis Plutellae a More Effective Parasitoid of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella ?
    War of the Wasps: Is Diadegma insulare or Microplitis plutellae a More Effective Parasitoid of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella ? ADAMO YOUNG 108 Homestead Street, Ottawa Ontario K2E 7N6 Canada; email: [email protected] Young, Adamo. 2013. War of the wasps: is Diadegma insulare or Microplitis plutellae a more effective parasitoid of the Dia - mondback Moth, Plutella xylostella ? Canadian Field-Naturalist 127(3): 211–215. Parasitism levels by Diadegma insulare (Muesebeck) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Microplitis plutellae (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) at various densities of their host, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), were assessed. Cages with densities of 10 hosts, 20 hosts, and 40 hosts were set up, with the cage volume (40 500 cm 3) and number of wasps (2 females) remaining constant. The host populations were also exposed to the wasps for two different exposure times: 1 day and 3 days. The study showed that D. insulare was a better parasitoid overall, achieving a level of parasitism equal to or higher than M. plutellae at all densities. Microplitis plutellae performed best at a lower host density (76% ± 9% of 10 hosts vs. 43% ± 3% of 40 hosts). Diadegma insulare performed similarly at all densities tested (75% ± 5% of 10 hosts, 83% ± 4% of 20 hosts, and 79% ± 6% of 40 hosts). This suggests that D. insulare may be the better parasitoid overall and should be applied in severe, large-scale infestations, while M. plutellae may be better for small-scale infestations. Key Words: Diamondback Moth; Plutella xylostella; Microplitis plutellae; Diadegma insulare; parasitoids; biological control Introduction ical control can provide better control than pesticides.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on the Reproduction of the Amphisbaenia with Notes on Four Neotropical Species
    Amphibia-Reptilia 27 (2006): 207-217 Habits hidden underground: a review on the reproduction of the Amphisbaenia with notes on four neotropical species Denis V. Andrade1, Luciana B. Nascimento2, Augusto S. Abe1 Abstract. We review the information currently available on the reproduction of the Amphisbaenia and provide original data on the reproductive biology of four Neotropical species: Amphisbaena alba; A. mertensi; Cercolophia roberti,and Leposternon infraorbitale. In total, we compiled data for 22 species: 17 Amphisbaenidae, 1 Rhineuridae, 3 Bipedidae, and 1 Trogonophidae. The majority of the species were oviparous with the exceptions of Loveridgea ionidesii, Monopeltis anchietae, M. capensis,andTrogonophis wiegmanni. Viviparity was interpreted as a derived trait that evolved independently for at least 3 times within the Amphisbaenia. In most species, reproduction is synchronized with the hot and rainy season and seems to vary with latitude. Although Amphisbaenia eggs have been found in ant nests, it remains disputable whether this is an obligatory or even a preferable location for egg-laying. Incubation time in A. mertensii lasts 59 days and this is the first report encompassing egg-laying to hatching for any Amphisbaenia species. Nonetheless, a two months incubation period seems to be the common rule for oviparous Amphisbaenia. The general pattern of reproductive output in Amphisbaenia is characterized by a low number of eggs/embryos per clutch whose individual size is comparatively large in relation to adult body size. Eggs are markedly elongated on the long axis and arranged in-line within the abdominal cavity possibly to prevent/diminish biomechanic drawbacks of egg bearing. Hatchlings of A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion
    The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Strategic Framework for Conservation 2005 – 2025 Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) The Eastern Afrca Coastal Forests Ecoregon Strategc Framework for Conservaton 2005–2025 The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Publshed August 2006 Editor: Kimunya Mugo Design and layout: Anthony Mwangi Cover design: Kimunya Mugo Front cover main photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Front cover other photos: WWF-UK / Brent STIRTON / Getty Images Back cover photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Photos: John Salehe, David Maingi and Neil Burgess or as credited. © Graphics (2006) WWF-EARPO. All rights reserved. The material and geographic designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office ACS Plaza, Lenana Road P.O. Box 62440-00200 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 3877355, 3872630/1 Fax: +254 20 3877389 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.panda.org/earpo Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... iv Foreword........................................................................................................................... v Lst of abbrevatons and acronyms.............................................................................. v A new approach to
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nomination of the Eastern Arc World Heritage Property
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage NOMINATION OF PROPERTIES FOR INCLUSION ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST SERIAL NOMINATION: EASTERN ARC MOUNTAINS FORESTS OF TANZANIA United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism January 2010 Eastern Arc Mountains Forests of Tanzania CONTENTS EASTERN ARC MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION PROCESS ......................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................5 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY........................................................................................................9 1. A COUNTRY ................................................................................................................................9 1. B STATE , PROVINCE OR REGION ..................................................................................................9 1. C NAME OF THE PROPERTY .........................................................................................................9 1. D GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES TO THE NEAREST SECOND ..........................................................9 1. D MAPS AND PLANS , SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NOMINATED PROPERTY AND
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania National Report Phase 1: Integrated Problem Analysis
    Global Environment Facility GEF MSP Sub-Saharan Africa Project (GF/6010-0016): “Development and Protection of the Coastal and Marine Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa” TANZANIA NATIONAL REPORT PHASE 1: INTEGRATED PROBLEM ANALYSIS Dr Julius Francis (National Coordinator), Dr G M. Wagner, Dr A. Mvungi, Ms. Jema Ngwale and Ms Rose Salema March 2002 Disclaimer: The content of this document represents the position of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views or official policies of the Government of Tanzania, ACOPS, IOC/UNESCO or UNEP. The components of the GEF MSP Sub-Saharan Africa Project (GF/6010-0016) "Development and Protection of the Coastal and Marine Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa" have been supported, in cash and kind, by GEF, UNEP, IOC-UNESCO, the GPA Coordination Office and ACOPS. Support has also been received from the Governments of Canada, The Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom and the USA, as well as the Governments of Côte d'Ivoire, the Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa and Tanzania. Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. i Tanzania Country Profile ....................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1 1. Background...............................................................................................................................1 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Island Biology Island Biology
    IIssllaanndd bbiioollooggyy Allan Sørensen Allan Timmermann, Ana Maria Martín González Camilla Hansen Camille Kruch Dorte Jensen Eva Grøndahl, Franziska Petra Popko, Grete Fogtmann Jensen, Gudny Asgeirsdottir, Hubertus Heinicke, Jan Nikkelborg, Janne Thirstrup, Karin T. Clausen, Karina Mikkelsen, Katrine Meisner, Kent Olsen, Kristina Boros, Linn Kathrin Øverland, Lucía de la Guardia, Marie S. Hoelgaard, Melissa Wetter Mikkel Sørensen, Morten Ravn Knudsen, Pedro Finamore, Petr Klimes, Rasmus Højer Jensen, Tenna Boye Tine Biedenweg AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2005/ESSAYS IN EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY Teachers: Bodil K. Ehlers, Tanja Ingversen, Dave Parker, MIchael Warrer Larsen, Yoko L. Dupont & Jens M. Olesen 1 C o n t e n t s Atlantic Ocean Islands Faroe Islands Kent Olsen 4 Shetland Islands Janne Thirstrup 10 Svalbard Linn Kathrin Øverland 14 Greenland Eva Grøndahl 18 Azores Tenna Boye 22 St. Helena Pedro Finamore 25 Falkland Islands Kristina Boros 29 Cape Verde Islands Allan Sørensen 32 Tristan da Cunha Rasmus Højer Jensen 36 Mediterranean Islands Corsica Camille Kruch 39 Cyprus Tine Biedenweg 42 Indian Ocean Islands Socotra Mikkel Sørensen 47 Zanzibar Karina Mikkelsen 50 Maldives Allan Timmermann 54 Krakatau Camilla Hansen 57 Bali and Lombok Grete Fogtmann Jensen 61 Pacific Islands New Guinea Lucía de la Guardia 66 2 Solomon Islands Karin T. Clausen 70 New Caledonia Franziska Petra Popko 74 Samoa Morten Ravn Knudsen 77 Tasmania Jan Nikkelborg 81 Fiji Melissa Wetter 84 New Zealand Marie S. Hoelgaard 87 Pitcairn Katrine Meisner 91 Juan Fernandéz Islands Gudny Asgeirsdottir 95 Hawaiian Islands Petr Klimes 97 Galápagos Islands Dorthe Jensen 102 Caribbean Islands Cuba Hubertus Heinicke 107 Dominica Ana Maria Martin Gonzalez 110 Essay localities 3 The Faroe Islands Kent Olsen Introduction The Faroe Islands is a treeless archipelago situated in the heart of the warm North Atlantic Current on the Wyville Thompson Ridge between 61°20’ and 62°24’ N and between 6°15’ and 7°41’ W.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Turkana and the Lower Omo the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Account for 50% of Kenya’S Livestock Production (Snyder, 2006)
    Lake Turkana & the Lower Omo: Hydrological Impacts of Major Dam & Irrigation Development REPORT African Studies Centre Sean Avery (BSc., PhD., C.Eng., C. Env.) © Antonella865 | Dreamstime © Antonella865 Consultant’s email: [email protected] Web: www.watres.com LAKE TURKANA & THE LOWER OMO: HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF MAJOR DAM & IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENTS CONTENTS – VOLUME I REPORT Chapter Description Page EXECUTIVE(SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................1! 1! INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 12! 1.1! THE(CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................ 12! 1.2! THE(ASSIGNMENT .................................................................................................................................. 14! 1.3! METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................................... 15! 2! DEVELOPMENT(PLANNING(IN(THE(OMO(BASIN ......................................................................... 18! 2.1! INTRODUCTION(AND(SUMMARY(OVERVIEW(OF(FINDINGS................................................................... 18! 2.2! OMO?GIBE(BASIN(MASTER(PLAN(STUDY,(DECEMBER(1996..............................................................19! 2.2.1! OMO'GIBE!BASIN!MASTER!PLAN!'!TERMS!OF!REFERENCE...........................................................................19!
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bibliographie Des Fringilles, Commentée Et Ponctuellement Mise À Jour. Index Des Noms Scientifiques, Français, Anglais
    BIBLIOGRAPHIE DES FRINGILLES, COMMENTÉE ET PONCTUELLEMENT MISE À JOUR. INDEX DES NOMS SCIENTIFIQUES, FRANÇAIS, ANGLAIS. I N D E X T H É M A T I Q U E INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC, FRENCH AND ENGLISH NAMES OF FINCHES T H E M E S’ I N D E X (126 different themes). INDEX DES NOMS D’AUTEURS (126 thèmes différents). A U T H O R’S I N D E X E S ====================================================== Elle comprend douze fichiers suivant détail ci-après / That bibliography includes twelve files devoted to the following genera: Becs-croisés du genre Loxia soit les Becs-croisés d’Ecosse, bifascié, d’Haïti, perroquet et des sapins ; (Crossbills of the genus Loxia ; les Bouvreuils du genre Pyrrhula (Bullfinches of the genus Pyrrhula) ; les Chardonnerets élégant et à tête grise du genre Carduelis, les Chardonnerets nord-américains, Black-headed and Grey-headed Goldfinches of the genus and species Carduelis carduelis as well as the Goldfinches of North America ; les Gros-becs du genre Coccothraustes (Hawfinches of the genus Coccothraustes, former genera Hesperiphona, Mycerobas,Eophona) ; toutes les espèces de Linottes (Linnets of the world) ; Les Pinsons bleu, des arbres et du Nord (All the species of Chaffinches of the genus Fringilla) ; Les Roselins des genres Carpodacus, Leucosticte, Urocynchramus (Rosyfinches of the genera Carpodacus, Leucosticte, Urocynchramus) ; Le Serin cini, les Serins africains et asiatiques du genre Serinus ; les Venturons montagnard et de Corse (The Serin and african, asiatic Serins of the Genera Serinus, Alario, Citril and Corsican
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]