DOCSLIB.ORG

The Correlation of Keratin Expression with In-Vitro Epithelial Cell Line Differentiation Aden, Deeqo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Correlation of Keratin Expression with In-Vitro Epithelial Cell Line Differentiation Aden, Deeqo The correlation of keratin expression with in-vitro epithelial cell line differentiation Aden, Deeqo The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author For additional information about this publication click this link. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/308 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] The correlation of keratin expression with in-vitro epithelial cell line differentiation Deeqo Aden Thesis submitted to the University of London for Degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Supervisors: Professor Ian. C. Mackenzie Professor Farida Fortune Centre for Clinical and Diagnostic Oral Science Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary, University of London 2009 Contents Content pages ……………………………………………………………………......2 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….........6 Acknowledgements and Declaration……………………………………………...…7 List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………8 List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...12 Abbreviations….………………………………………………………………..…...14 Chapter 1: Literature review 16 1.1 Structure and function of the Oral Mucosa……………..…………….…..............17 1.2 Maintenance of the oral cavity...……………………………………….................20 1.2.1 Environmental Factors which damage the Oral Mucosa………. ….…………..21 1.3 Structure and function of the Oral Mucosa ………………...….……….………...21 1.3.1 Skin Barrier Formation………………………………………………….……...22 1.4 Comparison of Oral Mucosa and Skin…………………………………….……...24 1.5 Developmental and Experimental Models used in Oral mucosa and Skin...……..28 1.6 Keratinocytes…………………………………………………….….....................29 1.6.1 Desmosomes…………………………………………….…...............................29 1.6.2 Hemidesmosomes……………………………………….…...............................30 1.6.3 Tight Junctions………………………….……………….…...............................32 1.6.4 Gap Junctions………………………….……………….….................................32 1.7 Keratinocyte Differentiation……………………….…..........................................34 1.7.1 Molecules Involved in Transition from Basal to Suprabasal Differentiated Cells of the Epidermis ……………………….…..................................................................36 1.7.2 Factors influencing Keratinocyte Differentiation…............................................38 1.8 Intermediate Filaments Proteins (IFPs)……..…………………………….…........40 1.9 Intermediate Filament Structure…………………………………………………..42 1.10 Keratins………………………………..………………………...........................43 1.11 Keratin Function……………………………………………………….….…….47 1.12 Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation of Keratin Gene Expression……....48 1.13 Transcriptional regulation of keratin gene expression………………………......49 1.13.1 Transcriptional regulation of K12 Gene…………….……….……………......49 1.13.2 Transcriptional Regulation of K14, K3, K15 and K6 Genes………………….49 1.13.3 Transcriptional Regulation of K19 Gene……………………………………...49 1.13.4 Transcriptional Regulation of K4 Gene……………………………………….50 1.13.5 Transcriptional Regulation of K17 Gene ………………………………….….50 1.13.6 Transcriptional Regulation of K3 Gene …..……………………………….….50 1.13.7 Using Proximal Promoters………………...……………………………......…51 1.14 Post-translational Modification of Keratin Proteins…………………………….52 1.14.1 Phosphorylation Modification of Other IFPs……………………………….…54 1.15 Keratin Expression in Normal Epithelia……………………………………….. 55 1.15.1 Hair-Specific Keratins……………………………………………………...….56 1.16 Keratin Expression in Pathology………………………….……………………..58 1.17 Keratins Implicated in Genetic Diseases………………………………………...59 1.17.1 Keratin Mutations and Overlapping Phenotypes ……………………………..60 1.18 Keratin 13……………………………………………………………………….61 1.18.1 Factors influencing K13 expression…………………………………………...62 1.18.2 K13 Expression in Development and Experimental Models………………….62 2 1.18.3 Epigenetic Control of Gene Expression……………………………………….63 1.19 Keratin 15…………………………………………………………………..…....65 1.19.1 K15 and 13 Expression as Models of in-vitro Epithelial Differentiation……..65 1.19.2 Factors and Regulatory Elements influencing K15 Expression……………….66 1.20 Hypothesis and Aims of the Study……………………………………………....67 Chapter 2: Methods and Materials 69 2.1 Reporter Gene Assays ……………………………………………………………70 2.1.1Wild-Type GFP to Variant EGFP……………………………………………….71 2.1.2 Control Plasmid Constructs used for Transfection.………………………….…72 2.2 Cloning strategy for K15 and K13 Promoter Constructs…………………………73 2.2.1 Construction of K15 and K13 Promoter Reporter Gene Plasmids……………..74 2.3 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)………………………………...……………..74 2.4 pEGFP-N3B Vector……………...………………………………...……………..75 2.4.1 Abolishing AseI restriction site in pEGFP-N3 vector…………...……………..75 2.4.2 Making the K13 and K15 Promoter Construct…………………………..……..78 2.5 Agarose Gel……………………………………………………………………….82 2.5.1 Isolation of DNA from Agarose gel and DNA Purification……………………82 2.5.2 Ligation of Insert to Vector……………………………………………………..82 2.5.3 Bacterial Strains used for Transformation in this Study………………………..83 2.5.4 Plasmid Transformation using Competent Bacterial Cells…………………..…83 2.5.5 Restriction Digestion …………………………………………………………...83 2.6 Purification of Plasmid DNA from 3-10ml Bacterial Culture……………………84 2.6.1 Purification of Plasmid using Qiagen Maxiprep Kit……………………………84 2.6.2 DNA Precipitation………………………………………………………………84 2.7 Spectrophotometer………………………………………………………………..85 2.8 Cell Culture Media and Types of Cell…………………………………………...85 2.8.1 Cell Seeding and Counting using a Haemocytometer………………………….86 2.9 DNA Transient transfection into adherent cell lines using Fugene 6…………….87 2.9.1 DNA Transient Transfection into Adherent Cell Lines using Lipofectamine….88 2.10 Fluorescence Activated Cell-Sorting (FACS) Analysis.………………………...88 2.10.1 Visualization of EGFP and DsRed Labelled Promoters………………….…...89 2.10.2 Flow Cytometry Data Analysis………………….……………………………..89 2.10.3 Flow Cytometry………………….….................................................................90 2.11 Addition of Pharmacological Agents to K13 and K15 Promoter Constructs…...90 2.12 DNA Sequencing………………………………………………………...……...91 2.13 Transcription Factor Database………………………………………………….91 2.14 Isolating and Truncating the Human K13 Promoter Construct…………………92 2.14.1 Designing Primers for pEGFP-N3BK13Pro-7.117kb………………………....96 2.14.2 Designing Primers for Sequencing of pEGFP N3BK13Pro Deletion Series….98 2.14.3 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit………………………………………………...98 2.14.4 Quick-change Multi-site Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene)………..…..99 2.15 Immunocytochemistry…………………………………………………………101 2.16 MTT Assay…………………………………………………………………….102 2.16.1 MTT Assay procedure……………………………………………………….103 2.17 Western Blot…………………………………………………………………...103 2.17.1 Sample Collection……………………………………………………………103 2.17.2 SDS PAGE…………………………………………………………………...104 2.17.3 Protein Transfer Membrane using Semi-dry Method………………………..104 2.17.4 Membrane Staining…………………………………………………………..104 2.17.5 Blocking Membrane………………………………………………………….105 3 2.17.6 Antibody Binding…………………………………………………………….105 2.17.7 ECL Detection and Protein Exposure………………………………………..105 2.17.8 Densitometry …………………………………………………………….......106 2.18 Stable Transfection …………………………………………............................106 2.18.1 K13 or K15 Promoter linked GFP Expression in Oral SCC25 Cells………...106 2.18.2 Analysis of K13 and K15 Promoter expression by FACS…………………...106 2.18.3 Analysis of K13 or K15 Promoter Expression using Colony Forming Assay.107 Chapter 3: Comparative bioinformatics analysis of keratin promoters 108 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….109 3.2 Computational Approach to Identifying Transcription Factor Binding Sites…...109 3.2.2 Technical Approach used to Identify Regulatory Elements…………………..111 3.2.3 Computational Databases used to Identify Keratin Tissue-Specific……….….113 3.3 Aims……………….…………………………………………….........................115 3.4 Materials and Methods……………………………………………....................115 3.5 Results………………………………………….................................................116 3.5.1 5'-upstream region of Keratin Genes………………………………………….116 3.5.2 Data Organisation and Analysis………………..……………….......................118 3.5.3 Transcription Factor Selection………………………………………………...121 3.5.4 Tfbs in skin suprabasal keratins promoters……................................................125 3.5.5 Tfbs in pathological suprabasal keratins promoters…………………………...127 5.5.6 Tfbs in palm and sole suprabasal keratins promoters…………………………128 3.5.7 Tfbs in oral mucosa suprabasal keratins promoters….......................................129 3.5.8 Tfbs in cornea suprabasal keratins promoters…………………………………130 3.5.9 Tfbs in simple epithelia suprabasal promoters………………………………...131 3.5.10 Comparison of Tfbs in basal and suprabasal promoters……………..………131 3.6 Discussion……………………………………………….....................................136 Chapter 4: Isolation and tissue specific expression of K13 promoter 138 4.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………........139 4.2 Aims…………………………………………………………….……………….141 4.3 Materials and Methods………………………………..….……………………...141 4.4 Results………….………………………………………………………………..143 4.4.1 Restriction Analysis of K13 and K15 Promoter Constructs ……………………...143 4.4.2 Restriction Digestion Analysis of K13 Promoter Deletion Fragments…..……145 4.4.3 K13 FL Promoter Sequence Information and Transcription Factor Database...148
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development and Maintenance of Epidermal Stem Cells in Skin Adnexa
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Development and Maintenance of Epidermal Stem Cells in Skin Adnexa Jaroslav Mokry * and Rishikaysh Pisal Medical Faculty, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020; Published: 20 December 2020 Abstract: The skin surface is modified by numerous appendages. These structures arise from epithelial stem cells (SCs) through the induction of epidermal placodes as a result of local signalling interplay with mesenchymal cells based on the Wnt–(Dkk4)–Eda–Shh cascade. Slight modifications of the cascade, with the participation of antagonistic signalling, decide whether multipotent epidermal SCs develop in interfollicular epidermis, scales, hair/feather follicles, nails or skin glands. This review describes the roles of epidermal SCs in the development of skin adnexa and interfollicular epidermis, as well as their maintenance. Each skin structure arises from distinct pools of epidermal SCs that are harboured in specific but different niches that control SC behaviour. Such relationships explain differences in marker and gene expression patterns between particular SC subsets. The activity of well-compartmentalized epidermal SCs is orchestrated with that of other skin cells not only along the hair cycle but also in the course of skin regeneration following injury. This review highlights several membrane markers, cytoplasmic proteins and transcription factors associated with epidermal SCs. Keywords: stem cell; epidermal placode; skin adnexa; signalling; hair pigmentation; markers; keratins 1. Epidermal Stem Cells as Units of Development 1.1. Development of the Epidermis and Placode Formation The embryonic skin at very early stages of development is covered by a surface ectoderm that is a precursor to the epidermis and its multiple derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Keratin 19 Regulates Cell Shape and Cell-Cell Adhesion of MCF7 Cells While Maintaining E-Cadherin Localization at the Cell Surface
    Keratin 19 regulates cell shape and cell-cell adhesion of MCF7 cells while maintaining E-cadherin localization at the cell surface Welcome to my poster. This is Sarah Alsharif, a PhD student from the biology department. I am glad to present the work our lab has been doing in the breast cancer field. In fact, after lung cancer, breast cancer is the second cause of death in women worldwide (1). It is estimated that every 18 seconds, approximately one new case of breast cancer is documented (2). No one dies due to cancer itself. The death is because of metastasis which takes place when cancer cells leave a breast in which they are formed and reach other sites such as the brain or lung. Our lab is interested in investigating the mechanism behind metastasis of breast cancer. Metastasis is associated with what is called epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), the process characterized by loss of cell to cell adhesion and expression of epithelial markers such as keratin intermediate filament proteins, as you can see in the first three images of cells. Those filaments are keratins and they are critical for the shape and for maintaining mechanical integrity of epithelial cells via cell to cell complexes called desmosomes. Among different keratins, keratin 19 (K19) is highly expressed in many types of cancer including breast cancer, and is correlated with a worse prognosis (3). Consistently, K19 expression has been reported to be significantly higher in metastatic breast cancer tumor cells compared to primary tumors (4). The role of K19 on mechanical properties of cancer cells for cell migration and possible impact on metastasis in breast cancer patients is still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Associated Palmoplantar Keratoderma
    DR ABIGAIL ZIEMAN (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-8236-207X) Article type : Review Article Pathophysiology of pachyonychia congenita-associated palmoplantar keratoderma: New insight into skin epithelial homeostasis and avenues for treatment Authors: A. G. Zieman1 and P. A. Coulombe1,2 # Affiliations: 1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; 2Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA #Corresponding author: Pierre A. Coulombe, PhD, 3071 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Tel: 734-615-7509. Email: [email protected]. Funding Sources: These studies were supported by grant AR044232 issued to P.A.C. from the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease (NIAMS). A.G.Z. received support from grant T32 CA009110 from the National Cancer Institute. Author Manuscript This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/BJD.18033 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved Conflict of interest disclosures: None declared. Bulleted statements: What’s already known about this topic? Pachyonychia congenita is a rare genodermatosis caused by mutations in KRT6A, KRT6B, KRT6C, KRT16, KRT17, which are normally expressed in skin appendages and induced following injury. Individuals with PC present with multiple clinical symptoms that usually include thickened and dystrophic nails, palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK), glandular cysts, and oral leukokeratosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid-Dependent Regulation of the Oviduct: a Cross-Species Transcriptomal Analysis
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences Animal and Food Sciences 2015 Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis Katheryn L. Cerny University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cerny, Katheryn L., "Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences. 49. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/animalsci_etds/49 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal and Food Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    1 Supplementary Materials: Supplemental Figure 1. Gene expression profiles of kidneys in the Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice. (A) A heat map of microarray data show the genes that significantly changed up to 2 fold compared between Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice (N=4 mice per group; p<0.05). Data show in log2 (sample/wild-type). 2 Supplemental Figure 2. Sting signaling is essential for immuno-phenotypes of the Fcgr2b-/-lupus mice. (A-C) Flow cytometry analysis of splenocytes isolated from wild-type, Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice at the age of 6-7 months (N= 13-14 per group). Data shown in the percentage of (A) CD4+ ICOS+ cells, (B) B220+ I-Ab+ cells and (C) CD138+ cells. Data show as mean ± SEM (*p < 0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001). 3 Supplemental Figure 3. Phenotypes of Sting activated dendritic cells. (A) Representative of western blot analysis from immunoprecipitation with Sting of Fcgr2b-/- mice (N= 4). The band was shown in STING protein of activated BMDC with DMXAA at 0, 3 and 6 hr. and phosphorylation of STING at Ser357. (B) Mass spectra of phosphorylation of STING at Ser357 of activated BMDC from Fcgr2b-/- mice after stimulated with DMXAA for 3 hour and followed by immunoprecipitation with STING. (C) Sting-activated BMDC were co-cultured with LYN inhibitor PP2 and analyzed by flow cytometry, which showed the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IAb expressing DC (N = 3 mice per group). 4 Supplemental Table 1. Lists of up and down of regulated proteins Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypomesus Transpacificus
    Aquatic Toxicology 105 (2011) 369–377 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Toxicology jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquatox Sublethal responses to ammonia exposure in the endangered delta smelt; Hypomesus transpacificus (Fam. Osmeridae) ∗ 1 2 Richard E. Connon , Linda A. Deanovic, Erika B. Fritsch, Leandro S. D’Abronzo , Inge Werner Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) is an endangered pelagic fish species endemic to the Received 9 May 2011 Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary in Northern California, which acts as an indicator of ecosystem health Received in revised form 29 June 2011 in its habitat range. Interrogative tools are required to successfully monitor effects of contaminants upon Accepted 2 July 2011 the delta smelt, and to research potential causes of population decline in this species. We used microarray technology to investigate genome-wide effects in fish exposed to ammonia; one of multiple contami- Keywords: nants arising from wastewater treatment plants and agricultural runoff. A 4-day exposure of 57-day Hypomesus transpacificus + old juveniles resulted in a total ammonium (NH4 –N) median lethal concentration (LC50) of 13 mg/L, Delta smelt ␮ Microarray and a corresponding un-ionized ammonia (NH3) LC50 of 147 g/L. Using the previously designed delta + Biomarker smelt microarray we assessed altered gene transcription in juveniles exposed to 10 mg/L NH4 –N from Ammonia this 4-day exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Keratin 9 Point Mutation in the Pedigree of Epidermolytic Hereditary Palmoplantar Keratoderma Perturbs Keratin Intermediate Filament Network Formation
    FEBS 17004 FEBS Letters 386 (1996) 149-155 Keratin 9 point mutation in the pedigree of epidermolytic hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma perturbs keratin intermediate filament network formation Setsu Kobayashi, Toshihiro Tanaka*, Norihisa Matsuyoshi, Sadao Imamura Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606 Japan Received 12 January 1996; revised version received 4 April 1996 Abstract Keratins form an intracellular keratin filament net- point mutations in the K9 gene in EHPPK [4-8] but none work in keratinocytes. Point mutations in the epidermal keratins showed a function assay with these mutations. Here, we pro- could lead to the disruption of keratin filament formation, vide the first demonstration that the point mutation found in developing skin diseases such as epidermolytic hereditary a pedigree of EHPPK has a dominant-negative effect on the palmoplantar keratoderma (EHPPK). We found a G to A assembly of keratin intermediate filaments in the cells. transition in keratin 9 (K9) cDNA, resulting in the substitution of glutamine for arginine at 162, in all patients of a pedigree of 2. Materials and methods EHPPK. Transfection into MDCK cells and DJM-1 cells revealed that the plasmid CMX vector containing normal keratin 2.1. PCR and DNA sequence 9 cDNA showed normal keratin network formation, whereas the Genomic DNA was extracted and purified from blood or biopsy vector with a G to A point mutated keratin 9 cDNA showed specimens from the patients. The primers were designed at nucleotide disrupted keratin filaments with droplet formation in the cells. 263 282 and 664-683 based on the K9 cDNA sequence [9].
    [Show full text]
  • 'Montalcino, a Zebrafish Model for Variegate Porphyria'
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2008 montalcino, A zebrafish model for variegate porphyria Dooley, Kimberly A ; Fraenkel, Paula G ; Langer, Nathaniel B ; Schmid, Bettina ; Davidson, Alan J ; Weber, Gerhard ; Chiang, Ken ; Foott, Helen ; Dwyer, Caitlin ; Wingert, Rebecca A ; Zhou, Yi ; Paw, Barry H ; Zon, Leonard I Abstract: OBJECTIVE Inherited or acquired mutations in the heme biosynthetic pathway leads to a debilitating class of diseases collectively known as porphyrias, with symptoms that can include anemia, cutaneous photosensitivity, and neurovisceral dysfunction. In a genetic screen for hematopoietic mutants, we isolated a zebrafish mutant, montalcino (mno), which displays hypochromic anemia and porphyria. The objective of this study was to identify the defective gene and characterize the phenotype of the zebrafish mutant. MATERIALS AND METHODS Genetic linkage analysis was utilized to identify the region harboring the mno mutation. Candidate gene analysis together with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was utilized to identify the genetic mutation, which was confirmed via allele- specific oligo hybridizations. Whole mount in situ hybridizations and o-dianisidine staining were usedto characterize the phenotype of the mno mutant. mRNA and morpholino microinjections were performed to phenocopy and/or rescue the mutant phenotype. RESULTS Homozygous mno mutant embryos have a defect in the protoporphyrinogen oxidase (ppox) gene, which encodes the enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen. Homozygous mutant embryos are deficient in hemoglobin, and by 36 hours post-fertilization are visibly anemic and porphyric. The hypochromic anemia of mno embryos was partially rescued by human ppox, providing evidence for the conservation of function between human and zebrafish ppox.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Biochemical Changes Underlying a Keratoderma-Like Phenotype in Mice Lacking Suprabasal AP1 Transcription Factor Function
    Citation: Cell Death and Disease (2015) 6, e1647; doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.21 OPEN & 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2041-4889/15 www.nature.com/cddis Structural and biochemical changes underlying a keratoderma-like phenotype in mice lacking suprabasal AP1 transcription factor function EA Rorke*,1, G Adhikary2, CA Young2, RH Rice3, PM Elias4, D Crumrine4, J Meyer4, M Blumenberg5 and RL Eckert2,6,7,8 Epidermal keratinocyte differentiation on the body surface is a carefully choreographed process that leads to assembly of a barrier that is essential for life. Perturbation of keratinocyte differentiation leads to disease. Activator protein 1 (AP1) transcription factors are key controllers of this process. We have shown that inhibiting AP1 transcription factor activity in the suprabasal murine epidermis, by expression of dominant-negative c-jun (TAM67), produces a phenotype type that resembles human keratoderma. However, little is understood regarding the structural and molecular changes that drive this phenotype. In the present study we show that TAM67-positive epidermis displays altered cornified envelope, filaggrin-type keratohyalin granule, keratin filament, desmosome formation and lamellar body secretion leading to reduced barrier integrity. To understand the molecular changes underlying this process, we performed proteomic and RNA array analysis. Proteomic study of the corneocyte cross-linked proteome reveals a reduction in incorporation of cutaneous keratins, filaggrin, filaggrin2, late cornified envelope precursor proteins, hair keratins and hair keratin-associated proteins. This is coupled with increased incorporation of desmosome linker, small proline-rich, S100, transglutaminase and inflammation-associated proteins. Incorporation of most cutaneous keratins (Krt1, Krt5 and Krt10) is reduced, but incorporation of hyperproliferation-associated epidermal keratins (Krt6a, Krt6b and Krt16) is increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantigene Flowrna Probe Sets Currently Available
    QuantiGene FlowRNA Probe Sets Currently Available Accession No. Species Symbol Gene Name Catalog No. NM_003452 Human ZNF189 zinc finger protein 189 VA1-10009 NM_000057 Human BLM Bloom syndrome VA1-10010 NM_005269 Human GLI glioma-associated oncogene homolog (zinc finger protein) VA1-10011 NM_002614 Human PDZK1 PDZ domain containing 1 VA1-10015 NM_003225 Human TFF1 Trefoil factor 1 (breast cancer, estrogen-inducible sequence expressed in) VA1-10016 NM_002276 Human KRT19 keratin 19 VA1-10022 NM_002659 Human PLAUR plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor VA1-10025 NM_017669 Human ERCC6L excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 6-like VA1-10029 NM_017699 Human SIDT1 SID1 transmembrane family, member 1 VA1-10032 NM_000077 Human CDKN2A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (melanoma, p16, inhibits CDK4) VA1-10040 NM_003150 Human STAT3 signal transducer and activator of transcripton 3 (acute-phase response factor) VA1-10046 NM_004707 Human ATG12 ATG12 autophagy related 12 homolog (S. cerevisiae) VA1-10047 NM_000737 Human CGB chorionic gonadotropin, beta polypeptide VA1-10048 NM_001017420 Human ESCO2 establishment of cohesion 1 homolog 2 (S. cerevisiae) VA1-10050 NM_197978 Human HEMGN hemogen VA1-10051 NM_001738 Human CA1 Carbonic anhydrase I VA1-10052 NM_000184 Human HBG2 Hemoglobin, gamma G VA1-10053 NM_005330 Human HBE1 Hemoglobin, epsilon 1 VA1-10054 NR_003367 Human PVT1 Pvt1 oncogene homolog (mouse) VA1-10061 NM_000454 Human SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, soluble (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 1 (adult))
    [Show full text]
  • 140503 IPF Signatures Supplement Withfigs Thorax
    Supplementary material for Heterogeneous gene expression signatures correspond to distinct lung pathologies and biomarkers of disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Daryle J. DePianto1*, Sanjay Chandriani1⌘*, Alexander R. Abbas1, Guiquan Jia1, Elsa N. N’Diaye1, Patrick Caplazi1, Steven E. Kauder1, Sabyasachi Biswas1, Satyajit K. Karnik1#, Connie Ha1, Zora Modrusan1, Michael A. Matthay2, Jasleen Kukreja3, Harold R. Collard2, Jackson G. Egen1, Paul J. Wolters2§, and Joseph R. Arron1§ 1Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, CA 2Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 3Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA ⌘Current address: Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Emeryville, CA. #Current address: Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA. *DJD and SC contributed equally to this manuscript §PJW and JRA co-directed this project Address correspondence to Paul J. Wolters, MD University of California, San Francisco Department of Medicine Box 0111 San Francisco, CA 94143-0111 [email protected] or Joseph R. Arron, MD, PhD Genentech, Inc. MS 231C 1 DNA Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 [email protected] 1 METHODS Human lung tissue samples Tissues were obtained at UCSF from clinical samples from IPF patients at the time of biopsy or lung transplantation. All patients were seen at UCSF and the diagnosis of IPF was established through multidisciplinary review of clinical, radiological, and pathological data according to criteria established by the consensus classification of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), and the Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) (ref. 5 in main text). Non-diseased normal lung tissues were procured from lungs not used by the Northern California Transplant Donor Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]