DOCSLIB.ORG

New Data on Shield-Bugs with Notes of Its Distribution in Siberia (Heteroptera: Pentatomomoidea)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROBLEMS OF ANIMALS SYUDY AND PROTECTION IN THE NORTH Proceedings Scientific conference November 16-20, 2009 Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russia P. 59-61 NEW DATA ON SHIELD-BUGS WITH NOTES OF ITS DISTRIBUTION IN SIBERIA (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMOMOIDEA) E.V. Kanyukova, N.N. Vinokurov Zoological Museum, Far Eastern State University E-mail: [email protected] Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithzone, Siberian Department, Russian Academy of Sciences E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on distribution of 57 Canthophorus niveimarginatus Scott, 1874. species and 2 subspecies of 6 families of NW Yakutia: Alakit R., right tributary of Olenek pentatomoid bugs in Siberia. Of them 46 species R. have been recorded for 18 regions of the territory Legnotus picipes (Fallén, 1807). Buryatia: investigated for the first time, 13 species and 1 Ulan-An, Maloe More, Baikal. Chita Prov.: subspecies have been eliminated from list of Ingoda R. Siberian Heteroptera as indicated mistakenly or Ochetostethus opacus (Scholtz, 1847). Omsk not confirmed by materials of the Zoological Prov.: Omsk. Institute. All new records of shield-bugs are Sehirus luctuosus Mulsant et Rey, 1866. based in the collection of the Zoological Institute Irkutsk Prov.: Bunbui, 80 km NE Taishet. (St. Petersburg – ZISP), Institute for Biological Khakasia: Abakan. Tomsk Prov.: Tomsk. Problems of Cryolithozone, SD RAS (Yakutsk – Sehirus morio (Linnaeus, 1758). Krasnoyarsk IBPC) and the Siberian Institute of Physiology Terr. (south): Minusinsk. and Biochemistry of Plant SD RAS (Irkutsk – Sehirus parens Mulsant et Rey, 1866. SIPBP). Distribution of this species in West Siberia (Lis, 2006) not confirmed by materials of ZISP Fam. UROSTYLIDAE collection and must be excluded from a list of Siberian Heteroptera. Uroсhela quadrinotata (Reuter, 1881). In Tritomegas bicolor (Linnaeus, 1758). Russia this species distributed only in South of Khakasia: junction of Balyksy R. and Tom’R. the Far East. Its indication from East Siberia (Rider, 2006a) wasn’t confirmed by rich Fam. PLATASPIDIDAE materials of ZISP. Coptosoma scutellatum (Geoffroy, 1785). Fam. CYDNIDAE Altai Republic: Ongudai. Khakasia: lake Shira. Microporus nigrita (Fabricius, 1794). Irkutsk Fam. ACANTHOSOMATIDAE Prov.: Alari, 35 km WWS Cheremkhovo. Adomerus biguttatus (Linnaeus, 1758). Acanthosoma haemorrhoidalis (Linnaeus, Krasnoyarsk Terr. (middle belt): upper reaches of 1758). A wide morphological variability is well Nizhnyaya Lebedyanka R. known for A. haemorrhoidalis L. and in the Adomerus notatus (Jakovlev, 1882). eastern part of Russia distributed subspecies A. h. Buryatia: Ust’-Urluk on Selenga R. Chita Prov.: angulatum Jak. (Kerzhner, 1964). As Pertova Sretensk. Tomsk Prov.: Tomsk. (1975) shown hiatus not distinctive and border between both subspecies approximately lies in 1 West Siberia. An indication of nominotypical Angarsky Districit, Mechet. Khakasia: stream subspecies in East Siberia (Göllner-Scheiding, Berezovyi, tribute of the Abakan R.; junction of 2006a) not confirmed by material of ZISP the Balyksy and Tom’ Rivers. collection. Zicrona caerulea (Linnaeus, 1758). Buryatia: Elasmostethus interstinctus (Linnaeus, Troitskosavsk; Elanskoe-Ungurkui. Jewish Aut. 1758). Yamalo-Nenetsky Autonomous Okrug: Prov.: Birobidzhan, khrebet B. Churki. Yamal penisnula, Obskaya bay, cape Kamenny. Aelia acuminata (Linnaeus, 1758). Buryatia: Elasmucha fieberi (Jakovlev, 1865). Pribaikal’sky District, Zolotoi Klyuch vill., Turka Northern Yakutia: delta of the Yana R. NW R., island Zmeiny (SIPBP). Yakutia: Zhigansk. Aelia klugii Hahn, 1833. Altai Republic: Jailu E cost of lake Teletskoe. Kemerovo Prov.: Fam. SCUTELLERIDAE Kuznetsky okrug, Bochat’. Tomsk Prov.: Tom’R., 8 rm of Tomsk. Irochrotus caspius Jakovlev, 1875. Aelia sibirica Reuter, 1884. Buryatia: Distribution of I. caspius in West Siberia Verkhne-Udinskoe; Dureny-Kyakhta, Ust’-Urluk (Göllner-Scheiding, 2006b) not confirmed on on the Selenga R.; Bichura; Dzhidinsky District, material of ZISP collection and must be excluded Khuldat vill. (SIPBP). Chita Prov.: lake Barun- from a list of Siberian Heteroptera. This species Torei. Kemerovo Prov.: Tisul’ Mariinsky uezd. was recorded from Minusisk (Horváth, 1901) that Neottiglossa pusilla (Gmelin, 1790). Altai obviously will be concerned to I. sibiricus Kerzh. Terr.: Pavlovsk. Eurygaster dilaticollis Dorhn, 1860. Omsk Homalogonia obtusa (Walker, 1868). Jewish Prov.: Omsk. Aut. Prov.: Birobidzhan, Tikhon’kaya station. Eurygaster laeviuscula Jakovlev, 1886. This Antheminia aliena (Reuter, 1891). Buryatia: Far Eastern species was recorded mistakenly by mount Afonskaya, the MBol’shaya Bichura R.. Balakhonova, Kachesova (1998) but in a next Irkutsk Prov.: Belaya R, tribute of Angara R.; publication (Balakhonova, 1998) have been Irkutsk, Mal’ta; Padun; Bunbui, 80 km EN of mentioned another species, Eu. austriaca Taishet. Tyumen’ Prov.: Tobol’sk; upper reaches Schrank, that is more realistic. of Vakh R., right tributary of Ob’ R., environs of lake Andreevskoe. Fam. PENTATOMIDAE Antheminia pusio pusio (Kolenati, 1846). Kerzhner (1972) and Petrova (1975) recorded this Arma custos (Fabricius, 1794). Buryatia: subspecies for Western Siberia but accidentally Borgoj steppe; Botyi R. near Naushki left out of the Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the (=Troitskosavsk); Pribaikal’sky District. Chita Palearctic Region (Rider, 2006b). Prov.: Chita; Urul’ga station; Shivanda. Omsk Antheminia pusio longiceps (Reuter, 1884). Prov.: Omsk. Buryatia: Shara-Gol on Chikoi R. Irkutsk Prov.: Jalla dumosa (Linnaeus, 1758). Chita Prov.: Belaya R., tributary of Angara R.; Mal’ta-Usol’e, Ingoda R. Krasnoyarsk Terr. (south): etc. Tuva: Saigyn, W of Samagaltai. Verchneusinskoe. Antheminia varicornis (Jakovlev, 1874). Jalla subcalcarata Jakovlev, 1885. Khakasia: Buryatia: lake Gusinoe, near Selenga R. Chita mouth of Matur R., tribute of Abakan R. Prov.: lake Barun-Torei, mouth of Ulosy R.; Picromerus bidens (Linnaeus, 1758). Tomsk Saigyn. Prov.: Tomsk. Central Yakutia: Lena valley, Carpocoris coreanus Distant, 1899. Tuva: Khatyryk vill., 11- km N of Yakutsk. Barun-Khemchik; Fedorovka; Kaa-Khem; Kyzyl; Pintaeus sanguinipes (Fabricius, 1781). Sosnovka; Ulug-Khem. Jewish Aut. Prov.: Birobidzhan, khrebet B. Chlorochroa juniperina juniperina Churki. (Linnaeus, 1758). Krasnoyarsk Terr. (middle Rhacognathus punctatus (Linnaeus, 1758). belt): Eloguisk. Tuva: Biche-Aryk, triboute of the Buryatia: Ulyatui; Kyakhta. Chita Prov.: Buren R. Bal’zino, Chita. Chlorochroa pinicola (Mulsant et Rey, Troilus luridus (Fabricius, 1775). Chita 1852). Chita Prov.: Chita. Krasnoyarsk Terr Prov.: Baleisky District, Undy vill. Irkutsk Prov.: (middle belt): Alinskoe. Kurgan Prov.: From 2 Kurgan to Kryukovo. This species have been Eurydema oleracea (Linnaeus, 1758). This indicated for Yakutia (Kulik, 1965; Petrova, species had been recorded from Yakutia (Shapiro, 1975; Vinokurov, 1979). But later Vinokurov 1951; Kulik, 1965а – Yakutsk; Petrova, 1975 – (1985) have been excluded it from the fauna of Aldan) based on 1 specimen with doubtful label Yakutia and all previous records were referred to “Yakutsk” collected in the border of XIX and XX Ch. juniperina L. Afterward only this species centuries and stored in ZISP collection. In 2008 have been mentioned for Siberia (Vinokurov, second author collected it in South-Western Kanyukova, 1995). Yakutia near the border of Irkutak Prov. (upper Holcostethus ovatus (Jakovlev, 1889). Chita sources of the Pilka R., right tribute of the Lena Prov.: Sretensk. R., reserve territory “Pil’ka”). Rubiconia intermedia (Wolff, 1811). Altai Eurydema wilkinsii Distant, 1879. This Terr.: Belokurikha. Tyumen’ Prov.: Tobol’sk. species recorded from East Siberia (Rider, 2006b) Rubiconia peltata Jakovlev, 1890. Buryatia: be subject to cancellation from list of Siberian Troitskosavsk. Heteroptera because it not distributed in Russia. Eysarcoris lewisi Distant, 1883. Record of Eurydema dominulus (Scopoli, 1763). this insular (Sakhalin, Kuril and Japan) species in Kemerovo Prov.: Berchikul’; Khrebet Dzhesin; south of the Khabarovsk Territory (Kanyukova, Kuznetsk; Myski. Krasnoyarsk Terr. (middle 1988) is mistaken. belt): Baikit, Podkamennaya Tunguska; Erema Menida musiva Jakovlev, 1876. Jewish Aut. and Nepa on Nizhnaya Tunguska. NE Yakutia: Prov.: Raddevka. khrebet Cherskogo, vill. Sasyr on upper reaches Lelia decempunctata (Motschulsky, 1860). of Moma R., right tributary of Indigirka R. Jewish Aut. Prov.: Birobidzhan, khrebet B. Eurydema ventralis Kolenati, 1846. This Churki. In Russia this species distributed only in species widely distributed in south of Western South of the Far East. Its indication from East Siberia but accidentally left out of the Catalogue Siberia (Rider, 2006b) wasn’t confirmed by rich of the Heteroptera of the Palearctic Region materials of ZISP. (Rider, 2006b). Pentatoma metallifera (Motschulsky, 1860). Ancyrosoma leucogrammes (Gmelin, 1790). Jewish Aut. Prov.: Birobidzhan, khrebet B. This species recorded from East Siberia (Rider, Churki. 2006b) be subject to cancellation from list of Rhaphigaster brevispina Horváht, 1889. This Siberian Heteroptera because it not distributed in southern species distributed from East Russia. Mediterranean to Central Asia has been recorded Dybowskyia reticulata (Dallas, 1851). Chita for East Siberia (Rider, 2006b) and be subject to Prov.: lake Bol’shoi Chindant W Kharanor cancellation from list of Siberian Heteroptera. station. Irkutsk Prov.: Yurty. Sciocoris microphthalmus Flor, 1860. NW Yakutia: Zhigansk.
Recommended publications
  • Liste Commentée Des Pentatomoidea De La Manche

    Liste Commentée Des Pentatomoidea De La Manche

    Liste commentée des Pentatomoidea de la Manche Deuxième partie : les Pentatominae Cet article constitue donc le deuxième volet de l’inventaire provisoire des pentatomoïdes de la Manche. Le premier, rappelons-le, paru dans L’Argiope 73 (LIVORY , 2011) traitait les Acanthosomatidae, les Cydnidae, les Thyreocoridae, les Scutelleridae et deux sous-familles de Pentatomidae, les Podopinae et les Asopinae. Nous terminons ce recensement avec la sous-famille des Pentatominae. Avant de poursuivre notre énumération, je voudrais rendre hommage à Jean PÉRI C ART (1928-2011) qui nous a quittés l’année passée. Cet éminent entomologiste avait rédigé la plupart des ouvrages de la Faune de France consacrés aux punaises, soit comme auteur unique soit en tant que co-auteur. Les travaux de PÉRI C ART sur les hétéroptères ont une valeur immense et une portée internationale. Les volumes sur les pentatomoïdes étaient en cours de parution et sur les cinq prévus, seuls deux actuellement ont vu le jour. Nous espérons que la disparition de cet auteur n’empêchera pas la poursuite de cette publication et qu’elle conservera le même niveau scientifique. Sous-famille des Pentatominae Ces punaises possèdent un scutellum triangulaire qui ne dépasse guère en arrière le milieu de l’abdomen, ce qui les distingue nettement des Podopinae. Le rostre est mince et atteint au moins les hanches moyennes. Son premier article est logé dans un sillon qui occupe toute la longueur de la tête. Ce caractère sépare sans ambiguïté les Pentatominae des Asopinae. La 28 Bull. trim. ass. Manche-Nature, L’Argiope N° 76-77 (2012) plupart des Pentatominae sont phytophages mais quelques-uns complètent ce régime par une nourriture animale.
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea

    Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea

    VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO SISTEMÁTICA DE THYREOCORIDAE AMYOT & SERVILLE (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMOIDEA): REVISÃO DE ALKINDUS DISTANT, MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE DUAS ESPÉCIES DE GALGUPHA AMYOT & SERVILLE E ANÁLISE CLADÍSTICA DE CORIMELAENA WHITE, COM CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE A FILOGENIA DE THYREOCORIDAE, E MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE 16 ESPÉCIES DE PENTATOMIDAE COMO EXEMPLO DO USO DE CARACTERES DE IMATUROS EM FILOGENIAS Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, como requisito parcial à obtenção do Título de Doutor em Biologia Animal. Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia Co-Orientador: Prof. Dr. Cristiano F. Schwertner UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL PORTO ALEGRE 2014 “Sistemática de Thyreocoridae Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea): revisão de Alkindus Distant, morfologia do ovo de duas espécies de Galgupha Amyot & Serville e análise cladística de Corimelaena White, com considerações sobre a filogenia de Thyreocoridae, e morfologia do ovo de 16 espécies de Pentatomidae como exemplo de uso de caracteres de imaturos em filogenias” VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO Tese apresentada como parte dos requisitos para obtenção de grau de Doutor em Biologia Animal, área de concentração Biologia Comparada. ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Augusto Ferrari (UFRGS) ________________________________________ Dra. Caroline Greve (CNPq ex-bolsista PDJ) ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Cláudio José Barros de Carvalho (UFPR) ________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia (Orientadora) Porto Alegre, 05 de fevereiro de 2014. AGRADECIMENTOS À minha orientadora, Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia, pelos ensinamentos e por todas as oportunidades que me deu durante os treze anos em que estive no Laboratório de Entomologia Sistemática. Ao meu co-orientador, Prof.
  • Punaises » De Savoie Etat Des Connaissances En 2019 Familles Des Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae, Cydnidae, Acanthosomatidae, Thyreocoridae, Plataspidae

    Punaises » De Savoie Etat Des Connaissances En 2019 Familles Des Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae, Cydnidae, Acanthosomatidae, Thyreocoridae, Plataspidae

    Novembre 2019 « Punaises » de Savoie Etat des connaissances en 2019 Familles des Pentatomidae, Scutelleridae, Cydnidae, Acanthosomatidae, Thyreocoridae, Plataspidae Les « PUNAISES » de Savoie Liste illustrée des espèces, état 2019 André MIQUET Conservatoire d’Espaces naturels de Savoie (CEN Savoie), décembre 2019 Méconnues et mal aimées … Il n’est pas exagéré de dire que les punaises ne bénéficient ni de bataillons de naturalistes dédiés, ni d’un capital sympathie démesuré auprès du grand public. L’imaginaire collectif ne trouve aucune vertu à ces insectes exclusivement associés à des nuisances, notamment olfactives ... Le sous-ordre des hétéroptères (punaises et gendarmes) sont des insectes souvent plus ou moins aplatis, aux ailes en partie durcie, souvent colorées. Prédateurs ou phytophages, leur appareil buccal piqueur-suceur leur permet d’aspirer la lymphe des chenilles comme la sève des plantes. Le CEN Savoie pend en charge leur connaissance dans ce département dans le cadre de sa stratégie envers les « groupes orphelins ». Les Hétéroptères comportant 1400 espèces en France, il est proposé de focaliser sur le groupe des Pentatomoides, et ce pour trois raisons : - « seulement » 120 espèces en France, - la plupart identifiables sur (bonnes) photos macros, - guide national et atlas régional (Franche-Comté) récemment parus. Ce groupe est donc à même de bénéficier d’une meilleure prise en compte, en attendant un atlas de répartition, une liste d’espèces déterminantes ZNIEFF, une liste rouge, et une stratégie de conservation. Au- delà de leurs deux espèces exogènes, bien loin de n’être qu’une « nuisance », les punaises sont avant tout une partie intégrante de notre patrimoine naturel ! … désormais prêtes à « sortir de l’ombre » en Savoie Afin de promouvoir et faciliter leur identification en vue d’un pré-atlas de répartition, 79 espèces connues ou à rechercher en Savoie sont présentées.
  • Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises

    Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises

    Building-Up of a DNA Barcode Library for True Bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Germany Reveals Taxonomic Uncertainties and Surprises Michael J. Raupach1*, Lars Hendrich2*, Stefan M. Ku¨ chler3, Fabian Deister1,Je´rome Morinie`re4, Martin M. Gossner5 1 Molecular Taxonomy of Marine Organisms, German Center of Marine Biodiversity (DZMB), Senckenberg am Meer, Wilhelmshaven, Germany, 2 Sektion Insecta varia, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB – ZSM), Mu¨nchen, Germany, 3 Department of Animal Ecology II, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany, 4 Taxonomic coordinator – Barcoding Fauna Bavarica, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB – ZSM), Mu¨nchen, Germany, 5 Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany Abstract During the last few years, DNA barcoding has become an efficient method for the identification of species. In the case of insects, most published DNA barcoding studies focus on species of the Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Hymenoptera and especially Lepidoptera. In this study we test the efficiency of DNA barcoding for true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), an ecological and economical highly important as well as morphologically diverse insect taxon. As part of our study we analyzed DNA barcodes for 1742 specimens of 457 species, comprising 39 families of the Heteroptera. We found low nucleotide distances with a minimum pairwise K2P distance ,2.2% within 21 species pairs (39 species). For ten of these species pairs (18 species), minimum pairwise distances were zero. In contrast to this, deep intraspecific sequence divergences with maximum pairwise distances .2.2% were detected for 16 traditionally recognized and valid species. With a successful identification rate of 91.5% (418 species) our study emphasizes the use of DNA barcodes for the identification of true bugs and represents an important step in building-up a comprehensive barcode library for true bugs in Germany and Central Europe as well.
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Berend Aukema, Frank Bos, Dik Hermes & Philip Zeinstra

    Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Berend Aukema, Frank Bos, Dik Hermes & Philip Zeinstra

    nieuwe en interessante nederlandse wantsen ii, met een geactualiseerde naamlijst (hemiptera: heteroptera) Berend Aukema, Frank Bos, Dik Hermes & Philip Zeinstra Dit artikel biedt een overzicht van 42 soorten nieuwe of anderszins interessante Nederlandse wantsen, waargenomen of ontdekt in de periode 1998 tot en met 2004. Tupiocoris rhododendri (Miridae), Xylocoridea brevipennis (Anthocoridae), Metopoplax fuscinervis (Lygaeidae) en Elasmostethus minor (Acanthosomatidae) zijn nieuw voor de Nederlandse fauna. De tingiden Copium clavicorne en Derephysia sinuatocollis, de anthocoride Amphiareus obscuriceps, de lygaeiden Horvathiolus superbus en Holcocranum saturejae en de pentatomide Stagonomus bipunctatus pusillus werden elders al als Nederlandse soorten genoemd, maar worden hier voor het eerst in detail behandeld. Tupiocoris rhododendri, Stephanitis takeyai en Nysius huttoni zijn exoten, die ons land op niet-natuurlijke wijze hebben bereikt. Tot besluit wordt een geactualiseerde lijst gegeven van alle 618 in Nederland waargenomen soorten. inleiding in voorbereiding is. Tenzij anders tussen haakjes Sinds het vorige overzicht van nieuwe, zeldzame vermeld bevindt het materiaal zich in de collectie of anderszins interessante wantsen (Aukema et van de verzamelaar. Gebruikte afkortingen: al. 1997) zijn inmiddels veel vermeldenswaardige ac Amersfoortcoördinaten, ba - Berend Aukema, vonsten gedaan, die nog niet of niet in detail fb - Frank Bos, dh - Dik Hermes, pd - Planten- gepubliceerd zijn. ziektenkundige Dienst, pz - Philip Zeinstra, Met deze
  • Сравнительный Анализ Вибрационных Сигналов 16 Видов КлоповЩитников Семейства Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) © 2015 Г

    Сравнительный Анализ Вибрационных Сигналов 16 Видов КлоповЩитников Семейства Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) © 2015 Г

    ЗООЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ, 2015, том 94, № 3, с. 320–335 УДК 595.754.1:591.582 СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ВИБРАЦИОННЫХ СИГНАЛОВ 16 ВИДОВ КЛОПОВЩИТНИКОВ СЕМЕЙСТВА PENTATOMIDAE (HETEROPTERA) © 2015 г. Л. С. Шестаков Институт проблем передачи информации им. А.А. Харкевича РАН, Москва 127994, Россия email: [email protected] Поступила в редакцию 05.12.2013 г. Изучены репертуар и функциональное значение вибрационных сигналов 16 видов Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) европейской России. Близкие виды могут иметь разный репертуар. Анализ изменчи вости сигналов большинства изученных видов показал, что они стабильны по большинству пара метров. Наиболее изменчивым параметром является длительность серий, а самым стабильным – длительность пульсов. Ключевые слова: полужесткокрылые, вибрационная коммуникация, вибрационные сигналы, Pen tatomidae, Heteroptera, изменчивость. DOI: 10.7868/S0044513415030125 В настоящее время вибрационная коммуника (Draslar, Gogala,1976; Gogala, 1978). Например, ция обнаружена у представителей многих отрядов симпатрические виды Tritomegas (Cydnidae) изда насекомых (Claridge, Drosopoulos, 2006; Hoikkala, ют видоспецифичные вибрационные сигналы, 2006; Tishechkin, 2000). По мнению ряда авторов, производимые стридуляцией и вибрацией брюш именно этот способ передачи сигналовˆ является у ка (Gogala, Hocevar, 1990). Некоторые представи насекомых преобладающим (C okl, VirantDober тели Coreidae также используют вибрационные сигналы, причем их репертуар и структура у раз let, 2003; Laumann et al., 2007; VirantDoberlet ных видов могут сильно различаться. В частно et al., 2011). Эта форма коммуникации играет в сти, у Coreus marginatus обнаружены призывные жизнедеятельности многих насекомых важную сигналы самцов и сигналы ухаживания, а у Spa роль не только во внутривидовых, но и в межви thocera laticornis – только агрегационные сигналы, довых взаимодействиях. Например, хищник мо привлекающие особей обоих полов (Shestakov, жет искать жертву, ориентируясь по колебаниям 2009). субстрата, а потенциальная жертва – восприни мать его сигналы (Casas, Сhristelle, 2006).
  • Goldbachs- Und Ziebachsrück – Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1 Dorow, W

    Goldbachs- Und Ziebachsrück – Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1 Dorow, W

    Natwres-11-2.1:Layout 1 13.11.08 15:18 Seite 1 HESSEN Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, HESSEN ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz www.hmulv.hessen.de Naturwaldreservate in Hessen GOLDBACHS-GOLDBACHS- UNDUND ZIEBACHSRÜCKZIEBACHSRÜCK ZOOLOGISCHEZOOLOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGENUNTERSUCHUNGEN Naturwaldreservate in Hessen Naturwaldreservate Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück – Zoologische Untersuchungen NO OO 11/2.1 NN 11/2.111/2.1 Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 11/2.1 Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1 Wolfgang H. O. Dorow Theo Blick Jens-Peter Kopelke mit Beiträgen von Beate Löb, Sabine Kiefer & Michael Hoffmann (Aves) Jörg Römbke (Lumbricidae) Petra M. T. Zub (Lepidoptera) Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 45 2009 Impressum Herausgeber: Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Mainzer Str. 80 65189 Wiesbaden Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 3 34131 Kassel Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Grätzelstr. 2 37079 Göttingen http://www.nw-fva.de Dieser Band wurde in wissenschaftlicher Kooperation mit dem Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg erstellt. http://www.senckenberg.de – Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 45 – Titelfoto: Die häufige Krabbenspinne Diaea dorsata (FABRICIUS, 1777) lebt bevorzugt an Stämmen und auf Ästen von Laubbäumen. (Foto: Jürgen Fischer, Wunsiedel) Layout: Eva Feltkamp, 60486 Frankfurt Druck: Elektra Reprographischer Betrieb GmbH, 65527 Niedernhausen Umschlaggestaltung: studio zerzawy agd, 65329 Hohenstein Wiesbaden, April 2009 ISBN 978-3-89274-285-2 ISSN 0341-3845 Zitiervorschlag: DOROW, W. H. O.; BLICK, T. & KOPELKE, J.-P. 2009. Naturwaldreservate in Hessen. Band 11/2.1. Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück. Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1. Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung 45: 1-326. Inhaltsverzeichnis Band 11/2.1 DOROW, W.
  • Heteroptera) of Protected Areas of South-Eastern Received: 09-07-2018 Accepted: 10-08-2018 Kazakhstan, with Notes on Natural History

    Heteroptera) of Protected Areas of South-Eastern Received: 09-07-2018 Accepted: 10-08-2018 Kazakhstan, with Notes on Natural History

    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(5): 815-819 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Tree and shrub dwelling Pentatomidae JEZS 2018; 6(5): 815-819 © 2018 JEZS (Heteroptera) of protected areas of South-Eastern Received: 09-07-2018 Accepted: 10-08-2018 Kazakhstan, with notes on natural history Akoev МТ Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Akoev МТ, Khenzhegaliev АМ, Esenbekova PА and Homziak J Khenzhegaliev АМ Abstract Kazakh National Agrarian A biodiversity inventory of the woody vegetation in five protected areas in SE Kazakhstan (Kulsay University, Almaty, Kazakhstan kulderi, Altyn-Emel, Charyn, Ile-Alatau and Alakol Nature Reserves) recorded 23 species of Esenbekova PА Pentatomidae associated with trees, shrubs and woody understory vegetation. Two species, Arma custos Institute of Zoology, Almaty and Zicrona caerulea, are listed as threatened in the Red Data Book of the Almaty region. Of the 23 Kazakhstan recorded species, 8 species are predators (zoophagous), with the remainder plant feeders (phytophagous), further divided by dietary breadth into polyphagous -10 species, broad oligophages – 2 species, and Homziak J narrow oligophages - 3 species. Moisture preference strongly affected the distribution of species: 78.3%, A. Al Farabi Kazakh National were collected from mesophilic habitats, 8.7% were xeromesophiles, 4.3% mesoxerophiles and 8.7% University, Almaty, Kazakhstan xerophiles. The majority of species (20) go through diapause as adults; one species diapauses as larva. B. University of Vermont, All were univoltine. Burlington VT, USA Keywords: Pentatomidae, dendrobiont, protected areas, South-Eastern Kazakhstan 1. Introduction Asanov [2, 3] and Esenbekova [6] described the Heteroptera of southeast Kazakhstan and their biological, ecological features.
  • Notes on Nomenclature and Distribution of Some Palaearctic Pentatomidae (Heteroptera)

    Notes on Nomenclature and Distribution of Some Palaearctic Pentatomidae (Heteroptera)

    © Zoological Institute, St.Petersburg, 2005 Notes on nomenclature and distribution of some Palaearctic Pentatomidae (Heteroptera) I.M. Kerzhner Kerzhner, I.M. 2005. Notes on nomenclature and distribution of some Palaearctic Pen- tatomidae (Heteroptera). Zoosystematica Rossica, 14(1): 73-75. Eurydema dominulus montana Kerzhner, 1972 is considered a separate species (stat. n.). Two tentative synonymies are proposed: Sciocoris macrocephalus Fieber, 1851 = ? S. europaeus Amyot & Serville, 1843; Staria lunata (Hahn, 1835) = ? Cimex impressus Gravenhorst, 1807. Some nomenclatural problems are discussed and some new records of species are included. I.M. Kerzhner, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St.Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper includes new records, new synonymies and Ventocoris halophilus (Jakovlev, 1874). Russia (first discussion of some nomenclatural problems. All the ma- record for Siberia): 1 F, Omsk, 25.VI.1922 (Bezrukov). terial examined is kept at the Zoological Institute in China (new record): 1 F, Xinjiang, lower Kunges [= Kün- St.Petersburg. es], late June (Przewalski). V. obesus (Stål, 1865). Israel (new record): 3 M, 2 F, Subfamily PODOPINAE Eilat, on Capparis sp., 15-16.VI.1999 (Kerzhner). Crypsinus jakowleffi Schouteden, 1905. Lectotype Subfamily PENTATOMINAE (present designation): M, Sarp. [= Sarepta]. Paralecto- types: 1 M, Sarp.; 1 M, 2 F, *Sarp.; 1 F, Bogdo; 1 F, Neolodosocoris chinensis Memon & Ahmad, 2002. *Bogdo; 1 F, R. Pesk. [= Ryn Peski]; 1 F, Astrachan The new genus and species were described from a speci- [printed]. The asterisks mark inscriptions in Cyrillic char- men “with tags, H. sulcata Thunberg, USNM, Poh ho Dist. acters. All the specimens have two additional labels: “k.
  • Les Punaises Pentatomidae Vertes De France

    Les Punaises Pentatomidae Vertes De France

    Les punaises Pentatomidae vertes de France Clé photographique simplifiée Version 2.0 du 01 Février 2012 Par Vincent Derreumaux 1 Résumé Ce document a pour but de permettre l'identification des punaises de couleur verte que l'on trouve en France appartenant à la famille des Pentatomidae. Une clé de détermination simplifiée est donnée. Elle est illustrée par les photographies des parties morphologiques agrandies utilisées pour l'identification. Elle est suivi par des commentaires concernant chaque espèce accompagnés de photographies des adultes et souvent des juvéniles. Les punaises Pentatomidae vertes appartiennent à 3 tribus (Carpocorini, Pentatomini, Piezodorini) et 6 genres (Brachynema, Chlorochroa, Palomena, Acrosternum, Nezara et Piezodorus) Sommaire Anatomie d’un Pentatomidae / Termes utilisés ......................................................................... 3 Présentation des Pentatomidae vertes ...................................................................................... 5 Clé illustrée ................................................................................................................................ 6 Commentaires et photos de chaque espèce ............................................................................ 11 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 21 Bibliographie ............................................................................................................................ 21
  • Rote Liste Der Landwanzen / 2003 / 1. Fassung

    Rote Liste Der Landwanzen / 2003 / 1. Fassung

    HESSISCHES MINISTERIUM NATUR FÜR UMWELT, LÄNDLICHEN RAUM IN HESSEN UND VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ Rote Liste der Landwanzen Hessens 1 Rote Liste und Standardartenliste der Landwanzen Hessens (Heteroptera: Dipsocoromorpha, Leptopodomorpha, Cimicomorpha, Pentatomomorpha) mit Angaben zu Gefährdungsursachen und Habitatkorrelationen Wolfgang H. O. DOROW, Frankfurt am Main Reinhard REMANE, Marburg Hannes GÜNTHER, Ingelheim Carsten MORKEL, Butzbach Günter BORNHOLDT, Schlüchtern Edmund M. WOLFRAM, Mainaschaff Titelzeichnung: Dr. Franz Müller, 36129 Gersfeld 2 3 Inhalt Inhalt 1. Einleitung . 4 2. Stand der faunistischen Erfassung . 5 3. Bestimmungsliteratur . 6 4. Habitatkorellationen . 7 5. Gefährdungsursachen . 8 6. Gefährdungskategorien . 9 7. Standardartenliste . 13 7.1 Bemerkenswerte Arten . 40 8. Gefährdungsliste . 50 9. Gefährdungsstatistik . 58 10. Literatur . 60 10.1 Literatur zur Fauna Hessens . 60 10.2 Graue Literatur . 76 10.3 Weiter zitierte Literatur ohne hessische Fundangaben . 77 11. Danksagung . 79 12. Anschriften der Autoren . 79 4 1. Einleitung nen gehört die allseits bekannte Bettwanze. Entsprechend ihrer viel- Die Wanzen sind in Deutschland fältigen Lebensweisen hat sich un- mit 868 Arten in 36 Familien ver- ter den Heteropteren eine außer- treten (GÜNTHER & SCHUSTER 2000). ordentliche Formenfülle entwickelt, Die systematische Anordnung und die von winzigen milbengroßen Nomenklatur der folgenden Arbeit Moosbewohnern bis zu großen kä- orientieren sich an dieser Publika- ferartigen Baumbesiedlern reicht tion, ergänzt und korrigiert nach und zarte Weichwanzen ebenso AUKEMA & RIEGER (1999, 2001). Die umfaßt wie äußerst robuste Raub- 1. Einleitung 11 Familien der Wasserwanzen wanzen. Spezielle Sprung-, Fang- (Nepomorpha und Gerromorpha) oder Schwimmbeine wurden ent- mit 68 deutschen und 56 hessi- wickelt. Die Formenvielfalt kann an schen Arten wurden für Hessen dieser Stelle nicht ausführlich dar- bereits von ZIMMERMANN (1998) be- gestellt werden.
  • Abies Alba Mill.) in Comparison to Spruce (Picea Abies (L.) Karst.) and Oak (Quercus Petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) for Arboreal Heteroptera Communities in Bavarian Forests

    Abies Alba Mill.) in Comparison to Spruce (Picea Abies (L.) Karst.) and Oak (Quercus Petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) for Arboreal Heteroptera Communities in Bavarian Forests

    AFSV Naturnähe-Indikatoren und Naturwaldreservatsforschung waldoekologie online Heft 2 Seite 90 - 105 6 Fig., 5 Tab. Freising, Oktober 2005 The importance of Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) in comparison to spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) for arboreal Heteroptera communities in Bavarian forests Martin G o ß n e r Abstract Heteropteran communities in the canopies of Silver fir (Abies alba) and spruce (Picea abies) were studied at three lowland and three mountainous sites throughout Bavaria using flight-interception traps. At one lowland site sampling was extended to oak (Quercus petraea). A significantly higher number of species and specimens occurred on fir when compared to spruce. Including all sampled species, numbers on fir were even higher than on oak. Excluding tourists, oak was most species rich. Results demonstrate that fir, spruce, and oak harbour distinct communities. While specific communities including several rare species (e.g. Actinonotus pulcher, Psallus punctulatus) were found on fir, mainly generalists were found on spruce. Pinalitus atomarius, Cremnocephalus alpestris, Phoenicocoris dissimilis and Orius minutus significantly preferred fir. Therefore, with an increased cultivation of fir in lieu of spruce, an increase in Heteropteran diversity can be expected. Introduction Silver fir (Abies alba) was wide spread throughout Bavaria once and it is assumed that it covered around 8-15% of the potential natural forest area (WALENTOWSKI et al. 2004). In upland and mountain forests it was the most frequent coniferous tree species (SEITSCHEK 1978, SCHMIDT 2004). Because of its broad ecological amplitude it colonised a diverse spectrum of sites after postglacial remigration from its refuges which included mountain as well as dry lowland sites in Franconia (KÖLLING et al.