Introduction to Supernovae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Supernovae introduction to supernovae According to the In any case, no European record of the event has Annals of the Sung Dynasty (the ever been found. Sung-shih), on the first day of the chi-ho Since the appearance nearly a millennium ago of reign period, during the 5th month, on the the Sung “guest star” there have been only two chi-chou, a “guest star” appeared to the south other similar objects seen in our Galaxy. One oc- east of Tian-kuan. curred in 1572 in the constellation Cassiopeia. The guest star was so This was observed by the Danish astronomer Ty- bright that it could be cho Brahe and bears his name. It became bright seen during the day- enough to be visible in full daylight. The other time, and it remained star appeared in the constellation Ophiuchus in so for 23 days. Af- 1604 and was studied by Tycho’s student and col- An ter that, it gradually laborator, Johannes Kepler, though it was seen un- dimmed, finally fading known artist earlier by several other people. Kepler’s star, while may have recreated the from visibility after two years. not as bright as Tycho’s, was still as bright as Jupi- appearance of the Crab Japanese records also mention the ter. Since the appearance of Kepler’s star, no oth- Nebula supernova in star. 1054 on the side of ers have been seen in the Galaxy. a cave wall in Chaco At around the same time, half a This does not mean, however, that no additional Canyon, New Mexico. world away from China in what similar objects have been observed. In 1885 a new we now call Chaco Canyon, in star appeared in the center of the Milky Way’s Northern New Mexico, an ancestor of today’s companion galaxy M31, in the constellation of Hopi and Navajo painted what appears to be a Andromeda. It reached a peak brightness of 6-7th “guest star” into a protected rock overhang. The magnitude, making it easily visible in small tele- star is shown next to the crescent moon, and scopes against the background glow of the galaxy a hand print, perhaps that of the artist, is also itself. The object is important for historical rea- painted on the rock. Though this record is not sons because it was used to argue, incorrectly, that as detailed as that of the Sung astronomers, the the great spiral nebula of Andromeda was a new orientation of the moon and the guest star is star system, like our solar system, in the process of what it would have been on that day when the forming within our own galaxy. The astronomer Sung reported their guest star, strongly suggest- Harlow Shapley, in a famous 1922 debate with ing that the two are the same. Heber Curtis on the nature of the spiral nebulae, Such an impressive object, recorded in dispa- claimed that the appearance of the guest star in rate cultures around the globe, must have been Andromeda was due to a “new sun” just begin- visible in Europe as well as Asia and North ning to turn on. His argument was later shown to America. However, the date given in the Chi- be wrong. Edwin Hubble measured the distance nese annuls, by our modern reckoning, would to the Andromeda nebula and proved it was ex- have been July 4, 1054. At that time Europe- tremely far away and, in fact, an independent sys- ans were in the throes of the Dark Ages, and tem of stars – a galaxy on a par with our own the Norman Invasion was just a few years Milky Way. away. Perhaps they were too occupied Though these guest stars are rare with worldly concerns to mark down events in any given galaxy, the the appearance of a celestial visitor, universe or perhaps whatever record existed has been lost. The Crab Nebula is located just above the star mark- ing the tip of the lower horn of Taurus, the Bull. If you point a telescope toward the patch of sky described in the Chinese records from 1054, just a few degrees north and east of Aldebaran, the “eye” of Taurus, the bull, you will find a faintly glowing cloud. This is the Crab Nebula. It is the remains of a star that exploded some 7000 years ago. The explosion was seen on contains many, many galaxies. With the ad- Earth only 1000 years ago because it was vent of large telescopes in the 1920s and 30s it so distant that its light required 6000 years was soon noticed that guest stars could be seen to reach us; the Sung and Chaco Canyon quite often if one looked at many galaxies. The inhabitants were seeing the explosion 6000 fact that the guest stars were nearly as bright as years after it happened. The Crab Nebula the galaxies in which they occurred meant that is a supernova remnant, the debris from they were enormously energetic. Their great an exploded star. It is still expanding brightness and release of energy prompted the today at more than 1000 km/s, (for astronomer Fritz Zwicky to dub them superno- more about supernova expansion vae, because they appeared similar to, but far see p.11) having slowed from an brighter than, the “novae” seen in our galaxy. initial expansion speed of more than Supernova is the name by which we still call 10,000 km/s. Inside the nebula is them today, though we now know they have the Crab pulsar, the compact nothing in common with novae except a name: remnant of the core of the supernovae are exploding stars, whereas novae exploded star. The pulsar is a are the much smaller explosion of the atmo- highly magnetized, rapidly sphere of a white dwarf star that is acquiring spinning neutron star, a class matter from a nearby binary companion star. of object that is among the (For more about supernova life cycle, see p.8.) most bizarre found in nature. In an ironic twist, recent observations of super- A mere teaspoon of the crab novae similar to the one seen in Andromeda pulsar would weigh in 1885 have allowed us to measure the vast more than a billion size and expansion rate of the universe. To our tons (for more about great surprise, these extremely distant superno- neutron stars see vae indicate that the expansion is accelerating, p.22.) rather than slowing down. These observations In the remainder indicate that approximately 70% of the energy of this education in the universe is something never before unit, you will ex- observed, with properties heretofore only plore the amazing properties imagined in the most speculative of our of supernovae and neutron stars. theories of nature. Far from showing You will also begin to learn that the universe is small, as Shapley ar- about some of the gued, supernovae have shown us that tools scientists use the universe is not only vast, but to understand much stranger than we had them. imagined. why stars explode The stars in the sky seem eternal and unchanging. But that’s an illusion. Like Initially, the star fuses hydrogen into helium. Like all things, stars are born, live out ash in a fire, the helium builds up in the core, but it their lives, and eventually die, doomed does not fuse because helium takes a lot more pres- to fade away. Stars like the Sun, which have sure and heat than hydrogen does to fuse. If the star a relatively low mass, age gracefully and die is massive enough, though, it can ignite helium fu- quietly after billions of years. But massive stars, sion in its core. The helium fuses into carbon, which with more than ten or so times the mass then starts to pile up in the core. In very mas- of the Sun, “do not go gently into sive stars this process repeats again and H that good night, but instead again, fusing lighter elements into rage, rage against the dying of He heavier ones: hydrogen to he- the light”. They explode in lium, helium to carbon, carbon a catastrophic detonation, C to neon, neon to oxygen, oxy- sending their outer layers O gen to silicon, silicon to iron. screaming outwards at a Si The star’s core starts to look few percent of the speed Fe like an onion, with layers of light: what astronomers nested inside one another. call a supernova. At every step, the process The seeds of a star’s ulti- generates more heat, and the mate destruction are plant- fusion goes ever faster. A star ed deep in its core, where its may fuse hydrogen into helium energy is generated. Stars are for millions or billions of years, giant balls of gas, and when a gas but by the time it starts to fuse sili- is compressed it heats up. Be- con into iron, it may take mere cause stars are so big they have Near the end of a massive star’s life, the fusion occurs in shells days. As iron piles up in the a lot of gravity, so at the core around the core, like the layers of an onion. core, the star is headed for di- of a star the pressure is intense. saster. This means they get very hot, hot enough to smash Why? Because up until iron, all the fusion reactions together atomic nuclei. And when nuclei collide, have produced energy in the form of heat. That heat they can stick together in a process called fusion.
Recommended publications
  • Determination of the Night Sky Background Around the Crab Pulsar Using Its Optical Pulsation
    28th International Cosmic Ray Conference 2449 Determination of the Night Sky Background around the Crab Pulsar Using its Optical Pulsation E. O˜na-Wilhelmi1,2, J. Cortina3, O.C. de Jager1, V. Fonseca2 for the MAGIC collaboration (1) Unit for Space Physics, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa (2) Dept. de f´isica At´omica, Nuclear y Molecular, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid, Spain (3) Institut de Fisica de l’Altes Energies, UAB, Barcelona, Spain Abstract The poor angular resolution of imaging γ-ray telescopes is offset by the large collection area of the next generation telescopes such as MAGIC (17 m diameter) which makes the study of optical emission associated with some γ-ray sources feasible. In particular the optical photon flux causes an increase in the photomultiplier DC currents. Furthermore, the extremely fast response of PMs make them ideal detectors for fast (subsecond) optical transients and periodic sources like pulsars. The HEGRA CT1 telescope (1.8 m radius) is the smallest Cerenkovˆ telescope which has seen the Crab optical pulsations. 1. Method Imaging Atmospheric Cerenkovˆ Detectors (IACT) can be used to detect the optical emission of an astronomical object through the increase it generates in the currents of the camera pixels [7,3]. Since the Crab pulsar shows pulsed emission in the optical wavelengths with the same frequency as in radio and most probably of VHE γ-rays, we use the central pixel of CT1 [5] and MAGIC [1] to monitor the optical Crab pulsation. Before the Crab observations were performed, the expected rate of the Crab pulsar and background were estimated theoretically.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Familiarizing Yourself with the Night Sky
    Chapter 3: Familiarizing Yourself With the Night Sky Introduction People of ancient cultures viewed the sky as the inaccessible home of the gods. They observed the daily motion of the stars, and grouped them into patterns and images. They assigned stories to the stars, relating to themselves and their gods. They believed that human events and cycles were part of larger cosmic events and cycles. The night sky was part of the cycle. The steady progression of star patterns across the sky was related to the ebb and flow of the seasons, the cyclical migration of herds and hibernation of bears, the correct times to plant or harvest crops. Everywhere on Earth people watched and recorded this orderly and majestic celestial procession with writings and paintings, rock art, and rock and stone monuments or alignments. When the Great Pyramid in Egypt was constructed around 2650 BC, two shafts were built into it at an angle, running from the outside into the interior of the pyramid. The shafts coincide with the North-South passage of two stars important to the Egyptians: Thuban, the star closest to the North Pole at that time, and one of the stars of Orion’s belt. Orion was The Ishango Bone, thought to be a 20,000 year old associated with Osiris, one of the Egyptian gods of the lunar calendar underworld. The Bighorn Medicine Wheel in Wyoming, built by Plains Indians, consists of rocks in the shape of a large circle, with lines radiating from a central hub like the spokes of a bicycle wheel.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Which Remained Immutable and Unchanged Thereafter
    THE ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS BY WILLIAM A. FOWLER CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA They [atoms] move in the void and catching each other up jostle together, and some recoil in any direction that may chance, and others become entangled with one another in various degrees according to the symmetry of their shapes and sizes and positions and order, and they remain together and thus the coming into being of composite things is effected. -SIMPLICIUS (6th Century A.D.) It is my privilege to begin our consideration of the history of the universe during this first scientific session of the Academy Centennial with a discussion of the origin of the elements of which the matter of the universe is constituted. The question of the origin of the elements and their numerous isotopes is the modern expression of one of the most ancient problems in science. The early Greeks thought that all matter consisted of the four simple substances-air, earth, fire, and water-and they, too, sought to know the ultimate origin of what for them were the elementary forms of matter. They also speculated that matter consists of very small, indivisible, indestructible, and uncreatable atoms. They were wrong in detail but their concepts of atoms and elements and their quest for origins persist in our science today. When our Academy was founded one century ago, the chemist had shown that the elements were immutable under all chemical and physical transformations known at the time. The alchemist was self-deluded or was an out-and-out charla- tan. Matter was atomic, and absolute immutability characterized each atomic species.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars: Introduction
    Neutron Stars: Introduction Stephen Eikenberry 16 Jan 2018 Original Ideas - I • May 1932: James Chadwick discovers the neutron • People knew that n u clei w ere not protons only (nuclear mass >> mass of protons) • Rutherford coined the name “neutron” to describe them (thought to be p+ e- pairs) • Chadwick identifies discrete particle and shows mass is greater than p+ (by 0.1%) • Heisenberg shows that neutrons are not p+ e- pairs Original Ideas - II • Lev Landau supposedly suggested the existence of neutron stars the night he heard of neutrons • Yakovlev et al (2012) show that he in fact discussed dense stars siiltimilar to a gi ant nucl eus BEFORE neutron discovery; this was immediately adapted to “t“neutron s t”tars” Original Ideas - III • 1934: Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky suggest that supernova eventtttts may create neutron stars • Why? • Suppg(ernovae have huge (but measured) energies • If NS form from normal stars, then the gravitational binding energy gets released • ESN ~ star … Original Ideas - IV • Late 1930s: Oppenheimer & Volkoff develop first theoretical models and calculations of neutron star structure • WldhWould have con tidbttinued, but WWII intervened (and Oppenheimer was busy with other things ) • And that is how things stood for about 30 years … Little Green Men - I • Cambridge experiment with dipole antennae to map cosmic radio sources • PI: Anthony Hewish; grad students included Jocelyn Bell Little Green Men - II • August 1967: CP 1919 discovered in the radio survey • Nov ember 1967: Bell notices pulsations at P =1.337s
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing Hubble
    PRESCOTT ASTRONOMY CLUB PRESENTS EXPERIENCING HUBBLE John Carter August 7, 2019 GET OUT LOOK UP • When Galaxies Collide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP3x7TgvgR8 • How Hubble Images Get Color https://www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue=3&v=WSG0MnmUsEY Experiencing Hubble Sagittarius Star Cloud 1. 12,000 stars 2. ½ percent of full Moon area. 3. Not one star in the image can be seen by the naked eye. 4. Color of star reflects its surface temperature. Eagle Nebula. M 16 1. Messier 16 is a conspicuous region of active star formation, appearing in the constellation Serpens Cauda. This giant cloud of interstellar gas and dust is commonly known as the Eagle Nebula, and has already created a cluster of young stars. The nebula is also referred to the Star Queen Nebula and as IC 4703; the cluster is NGC 6611. With an overall visual magnitude of 6.4, and an apparent diameter of 7', the Eagle Nebula's star cluster is best seen with low power telescopes. The brightest star in the cluster has an apparent magnitude of +8.24, easily visible with good binoculars. A 4" scope reveals about 20 stars in an uneven background of fainter stars and nebulosity; three nebulous concentrations can be glimpsed under good conditions. Under very good conditions, suggestions of dark obscuring matter can be seen to the north of the cluster. In an 8" telescope at low power, M 16 is an impressive object. The nebula extends much farther out, to a diameter of over 30'. It is filled with dark regions and globules, including a peculiar dark column and a luminous rim around the cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeps, Flashes, Bangs and Bursts
    Beeps, Flashes, Big stars work much faster: Bangs and Bursts. 1,000,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 and Chirps. Forever Peter Watson 3 hours! Live fast, Die Young! Peter Watson, Dept. of Physics Change colour, size, brightness •Vast majority of stars are boring: “main- sequence” (aka middle- class) changing very slowly. •Some oscillate: e.g Cepheids •Large bright stars change by factor 3 in brightness Peter Watson Peter Watson If Stars are large.... • we get supernovae • 6 visible in Milky Way over last 1000 years •well understood: work by blocking mechanism • SN 1006: Brightest •very important since period is proportional to Supernova. intrinsic brightness: • Can see remnants of the expanding •i.e. measure the apparent brightness, the period tells shockwave you the actual brightness, so you know how far away Frank Winkler (Middlebury College) et it is al., AURA, NOAO, NSF Peter Watson Peter Watson Remnant of a very Tycho’s old SN Supernova • Part of the veil nebula in X-rays in Cygnus (1572) Sara Wager NASA / CXC / F.J. Lu (Chinese Academy of Sciences) et al. Peter Watson Peter Watson The Crab (M1) •Recorded by Chinese astronomers "I humbly observe that a guest star has appeared; above the star there is a feeble yellow glimmer. If one examines the divination regarding the Emperor, the interpretation [of the presence of this guest star] is the following: The fact that the star has not overrun Bi and that its brightness must represent a person of great value. I demand that the Office of Historiography is informed of this." PW Peter Watson 1054: Crab •Recorded by Chinese astronomers as “guest star” •May have been recorded by Chaco Indians in New • X-rays (in blue) Mexico • + Optical 4 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2-15-2021 A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System Mariyam Ashai Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Rhea Gautam Mukherjee Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Sanjana Mundharikar Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Vinayak Dev Kuanr Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] Shivali Amit Wagle Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the Other Aerospace Engineering Commons Ashai, Mariyam; Mukherjee, Rhea Gautam; Mundharikar, Sanjana; Kuanr, Vinayak Dev; Wagle, Shivali Amit; and R, Harikrishnan, "A Bibliometric Perspective Survey of Astronomical Object Tracking System" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5151. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5151 Authors Mariyam Ashai, Rhea Gautam Mukherjee, Sanjana Mundharikar,
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean 1592--1593 Record of a Guest Star: Animpostor'of The
    Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society 49: 00 ∼ 00, 2016 December c 2016. The Korean Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. http://jkas.kas.org THE KOREAN 1592–1593 RECORD OF A GUEST STAR: AN ‘IMPOSTOR’ OF THE CASSIOPEIA ASUPERNOVA? Changbom Park1, Sung-Chul Yoon2, and Bon-Chul Koo2,3 1Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Korea; [email protected] 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea [email protected], [email protected] 3Visiting Professor, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Korea Received |; accepted | Abstract: The missing historical record of the Cassiopeia A (Cas A) supernova (SN) event implies a large extinction to the SN, possibly greater than the interstellar extinction to the current SN remnant. Here we investigate the possibility that the guest star that appeared near Cas A in 1592{1593 in Korean history books could have been an `impostor' of the Cas A SN, i.e., a luminous transient that appeared to be a SN but did not destroy the progenitor star, with strong mass loss to have provided extra circumstellar extinction. We first review the Korean records and show that a spatial coincidence between the guest star and Cas A cannot be ruled out, as opposed to previous studies. Based on modern astrophysical findings on core-collapse SN, we argue that Cas A could have had an impostor and derive its anticipated properties. It turned out that the Cas A SN impostor must have been bright (MV = −14:7 ± 2:2 mag) and an amount of dust with visual extinction of ≥ 2:8 ± 2:2 mag should have formed in the ejected envelope and/or in a strong wind afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • EVOLUTION of the CRAB NEBULA in a LOW ENERGY SUPERNOVA Haifeng Yang and Roger A
    Draft version August 23, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 EVOLUTION OF THE CRAB NEBULA IN A LOW ENERGY SUPERNOVA Haifeng Yang and Roger A. Chevalier Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904; [email protected], [email protected] Draft version August 23, 2018 ABSTRACT The nature of the supernova leading to the Crab Nebula has long been controversial because of the low energy that is present in the observed nebula. One possibility is that there is significant energy in extended fast material around the Crab but searches for such material have not led to detections. An electron capture supernova model can plausibly account for the low energy and the observed abundances in the Crab. Here, we examine the evolution of the Crab pulsar wind nebula inside a freely expanding supernova and find that the observed properties are most consistent with a low energy event. Both the velocity and radius of the shell material, and the amount of gas swept up by the pulsar wind point to a low explosion energy ( 1050 ergs). We do not favor a model in which circumstellar interaction powers the supernova luminosity∼ near maximum light because the required mass would limit the freely expanding ejecta. Subject headings: ISM: individual objects (Crab Nebula) | supernovae: general | supernovae: indi- vidual (SN 1054) 1. INTRODUCTION energy of 1050 ergs (Chugai & Utrobin 2000). However, SN 1997D had a peak absolute magnitude of 14, con- The identification of the supernova type of SN 1054, − the event leading to the Crab Nebula, has been an en- siderably fainter than SN 1054 at maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Stsci Newsletter: 1991 Volume 008 Issue 03
    SPACE 'fEIFSCOPE SOENCE ...______._.INSTITUIE Operated for NASA by AURA November 1991 Vol. 8No. 3 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE: HSTSCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS WF/PC OBSERVATIONS OF THE STELLAR O NEW SCIENCE RESULTS ON M87, CRAB PULSAR CUSP IN M87 O COSTAR PROGRESSING WELL The photograph on the left shows one of a set of images of the central regions of the giant ellipti­ O ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT HST DATA cal galaxy M87, obtained in June 1991 withHSI's Wide Field and Planetary Camera {WF/PC). 0 CYCLE 2 PEER REVIEW UNDERWAY Analysis of these images has revealed a stellar cusp in the core of M87, consistent with the pres­ ence of a massive black hole in its nucleus. A combined approach of image deconvolution and modelling has made it possible to investigate the starlight distribution in M87 down to a limiting radius of about 0'.'04 from the nucleus (or about 3 pc from the nucleus if the Virgo cluster is at 16 Mpc). The results show that the central struc­ ture of M87 can be described by three compo­ nents: a power-law starlight profile with an r·114 slope which continues unabated into the center, an unresolved central point source, and optical coun­ terparts of the jet knots identified by VLBI obser­ vations. In both the V- and /-band Planetary Camera images, the stellar cusp is consistent with the black-hole model proposed for M87 by Young et al. in 1978; in this model, there is a central mas­ sive object of about 3 x 109 Me.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves from Neutron & Strange-Quark Stars
    Gravitational Waves From Neutron & Strange-quark Stars • A billion tons per teaspoon: the history of neutron stars. • The discovery of pulsars and identification with NS. • Are NS really strange- quark stars? Supported by the National Science Foundation http://www.ligo.caltech.edu • GWs from NS and SQS. Gregory Mendell • What will we learn? LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO-G050005-00-W The Neutron Star Idea • Chandrasekhar Supernova 1987A 1931: white dwarf stars will collapse if M > 1.4 solar masses. Then what? • Baade & Zwicky 1934: suggest SN form NS. • Oppenheimer & Volkoff 1939: work http://www.aao.gov.au/images/captions/aat050.html out NS models. Anglo-Australian Observatory, photo by David Malin. (http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pul sar/tutorial/tut/tut.html; LIGO-G050005-00-W Jodrell Bank Tutorial) Discovery of Pulsars • Bell notes “scruff” on chart in 1967. • Close up reveals the first pulsar (pulsating radio source) with P = 1.337 s. • Rises & sets with the stars: source is extraterrestrial. • LGM? • More pulsars discovered indicating pulsars are natural phenomena. www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pulsar/tutorial/LIGO-G050005tut/node3.html#SECTION00012000000000000000-00-W A. G. Lyne and F. G. Smith. Pulsar Astronomy. Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pulsars = Neutron Stars • Gold 1968: pulsars are rotating neutron stars. •orbital motion •oscillation •rotation • From the Sung-shih (Chinese Astronomical Treatise): "On the 1st year of the Chi-ho reign period, 5th month, chi-chou (day) [1054 AD], a guest star appeared…south-east of Tian-kuan [Aldebaran].(http://super.colorado.edu/~a str1020/sung.html) http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991122.html Crab Nebula: FORS Team, 8.2-meter VLT, ESO LIGO-G050005-00-W Pulsars Seen and Heard Play Me (Vela Pulsar) http://www.jb.m an.ac.uk/~pulsa r/Education/Sou nds/sounds.html (Crab Pulsar) Jodrell Bank Observatory, Dept.
    [Show full text]