DOCSLIB.ORG

NWT Highway System 2017 Summer Works.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NWT Highway System 2017 Summer Works.Cdr Sachs Harbour Tuktoyaktuk Dempster Highway (No. 8) Amundsen NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Aklavik • Inuvik Airport Access Road Km 259.3 to Km 269.3Gulf HIGHWAY SYSTEM Plan for Tender 2017 Inuvik 2017 SUMMER WORKS 8 Fort McPherson Dempster Highway (No. 8) PTIC1 Bundle 1 • Campbell Creek Bridge Km 247.0 8 Bearings and Approaches Rehabilitation - Planning Stage PTIC2 Bundle 2 Tsiigehtchic UlukhatokCapital Projects Dempster Highway (No. 8) Paved Highway • Embankment Widening & Culvert Replacement Km 56.9 to Km 58.5 Paulatuk Negotiated with GDC Civil Construction, delayed Gravel Highway • Reconstruction Km 58.5 to Km 60.5 and Km 60.5 to Km 61.8 Winter Roads Plan Tender for 2017 1 Mackenzie Highway 2 Hay River Highway Dempster Highway (No. 8) 3 Yellowknife Highway • Dempster Highway Maintenance Garage Km 15.0 Planning Stage 4 Ingraham Trail 5 Fort Smith Highway Colville Lake Fort Good Hope 6 Fort Resolution Highway 7 Liard Highway 8 Dempster Highway Mackenzie Valley Winter Road • Donnelly River Bridge Km 1118.4 Bearings - Planning Stage River Norman Wells to Canyon Creek 18.75km Norman Wells • Awarded to TDIC/HRN Yukon Tulità Great Bear Déline Lake Nunavut Liard Highway (No. 7) Yellowknife Highway (No. 3) • Poplar River Bridge Km 219.7 • Stagg River Bridge Km 255.1 Wrigley Mackenzie Highway (No. 1) RoutineTungsten Bridge Rehabilitation • Shale Creek Bridge Km 527.2 Foundation Fill Remediation - Planning Stage Planning Stage • Smith Creek Bridge Km 687.2 Gamètì Yellowknife Highway (No. 3) Routine Bridge Rehabilitation - Planning Stage Liard Highway (No. 7) • Reconstruction Km 275 to Km 285 • Resurfacing Km 38 to Km 69 Awarded to DTR Construction, 2016-2018 Awarded to North Country, Completed 2016 Mackenzie • Reconstruction Km 256 to Km 261 • Resurfacing Km 87 to Km 96.5 and 1 Wekweètì Awarded to CJ Construction Km 130 to Km 137.5 Jean Marie River Access Road Awarded to Rowe’s Construction • Reconstruction Km 0 to Km 11 Ingraham Trail (No. 4) Awarded to Rowe’s,Whatì JMR, Nogha, • Baker Creek Bridge Km 2.0 Nahanni Buttte Access Road 2016-2018 (Work In Progress) • Yellowknife River Bridge Km 7.5 • Reconstruction Km 0 to Km 8 Behchokò • Cameron River Bridge Km 54.5 Fort Simpson Routine Bridge Rehabilitation - Planning Stage Awarded to Nogha Enterprises, Nahanni Butte 2016-2018 (Work In Progress) 7 3 INGRAHAM TRAIL (No. 4) Jean Marie River • Reconstruction Km 46 to Km 49 British Awarded to CJ Construction, 2016-2018 Mackenzie Highway (No. 1) 3 Yellowknife 4 • Jean Marie River Bridge Km 411.2 Fort Liard Fort Dettah Access Road Plan for RehabilitationColumbia 2018-2019 Dettah Providence • Reconstruction/Chipseal Km 0 to Km 6.6 1 Mackenzie Highway (No. 1) Awarded to Tlicho Landtran, Completed 2016 • Reconstruction Km 375 to Km 395 Sambaa K’e Yellowknife Highway (No. 3) Lutsel K'e Awarded to Rowe’s, JMR, Nogha, 2016-2017 Great Slave •Lake Deh Cho Bridge Km 24.0 • Reconstruction Km 207 to Km 212 Kakisa Approaches Embankment Remediation Plan for Tender 2018 Hay River 1 Call for RFP Opened May Closes mid June Mackenzie Highway (No. 1) Enterprise 2 Fort Resolution • Bridge Km 106.6 5 6 • Bridge Km 136.1 1 • Kakisa River Bridge Km 169.9 Alberta Fort Resolution Highway (No. 6) Routine Bridge Rehabilitation - Planning Stage • Reconstruction Km 28 to Km 42 and Chipseal Km 28 to Km 62 Awarded to Rowe’s Construction Hay River Highway (No. 2) 5 • Slope Protection at Km11.5 and Km 28 Awarded to Carter Industries Ltd., Completed 2016 • Dip Repairs Km 43 to Km 49 Fort Smith Plan for Tender 2017 Fort Smith Highway (No. 5) • Buffalo River Bridge Km 55.7 Rehabilitation Saskatchewan Awarded to Eiffage (EICI) H:\Technical Services\Designer\Maps\NWT Highway System 2017 Summer Works (May 2017).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Tłı̨chǫ All-Season Road Executive Summary March 2016
    Proposed Tłı̨chǫ All-season Road Executive Summary March 2016 Proposed Tłı̨ chǫ All-season Road Project Description Report March 2016 Department of Transportation i Proposed Tłı̨chǫ All-season Road Executive Summary March 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project description report (PDR) has been written to accompany the Type A Land Use Permit and Type B Water Licence applications to the Wekʼèezhìı Land and Water Board (WLWB) for development of the proposed T ł ı̨ c h ǫ All-season Road (TASR). These applications are being submitted by the Department of Transportation of the Government of the Northwest Territories (DOT – GNWT). The T ł ı̨ c h ǫ Government supports these applications. This project has been identified as a GNWT commitment under the Proposed Mandate of the Government of the Northwest Territories 2016-2019 (GNWT 2016). Over the years, DOT and T ł ı̨ c h ǫ Government have contemplated the possibility of improved transportation to the Wekʼèezhìı area. In 2011, both governments became reengaged under the T ł ı̨ c h ǫ Roads Steering Committee (TRSC) in order to assess the feasibility, desirability and implications of realigning the T ł ı̨ c h ǫ Winter Road System to provide improved community access. As of May 2013, the vision of the TRSC has been to pursue development of an all-season road. The route would end at the boundary of the community government of Whatì and predominantly follow ‘Old Airport Road,’ an existing overland alignment that was utilized up until the late 1980s as an overland winter road. The proposed TASR is defined as an all-season road approximately 94 km in length and 60 m in width with a cleared driving surface of approximately 8.5 m in width in order to accommodate a two lane gravel road with culverts and/or double lane bridges over water crossings as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Stantec Consulting Ltd
    Stantec Consulting Ltd. Stantec 130-2886 Sunridge Way NE, Calgary AB T1Y 7H9 October 26, 2016 MV2016E0006 File: 144902381.300 MV2016E0025 Attention: Mr. Glen MacKay Assessment Archaeologist NWT Cultural Places Program Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre PO Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Dear Mr. MacKay, Reference: Archaeological Impact Assessment: Department of Transportation – Highway Corridor Granular Supply Sources, Eastern Segment, Highways 3, 5 and 6, Interim Report #1 Archaeologist Permit 16-003 Permit Holder and Report Author: Matthew Moors, M.A. (Stantec Consulting Ltd.) Project Conservator: Prof. Elisabeth Robertson, Ph.D. Proponent Contact: Alexander Murray (Department of Transportation, GNWT) PO Box 1320, Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 – Ph: 867-688-1144, Email: [email protected] On behalf of the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT), Department of Transportation (DOT), Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) conducted an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) for the proposed Eastern Segment of the Highway Corridor Granular Supply Sources along Highways 3, 5 and 6 (the Project). The proposed Project will involve the development of 18 borrow sources and related facilities (i.e., along Highways 3, 5 and 6 (Figure 1). In early 2016, a desktop Archaeological Overview Assessment (AOA) was completed for the initial comprehensive program of proposed GNWT DOT borrow sources, associated with highways 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7. The AOA report was submitted to the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre (PWNHC), with recommendations for the completion of a targeted AIA for all areas of high archaeological site potential. The PWNHC agreed with this recommendation, as communicated by letter on April 5, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Canadian Transportation Sector 2016 (Pp
    3 · Northern Territories CHAPTER 3: NORTHERN TERRITORIES LEAD AUTHOR: KALA PENDAKUR1 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: JACKIE DAWSON (UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA), KATERINE GRANDMONT (UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL), DOUG MATTHEWS (MATTHEWS ENERGY CONSULTING), ART STEWART (GOVERNMENT OF NUNAVUT) RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pendakur, K. (2017). Northern Territories. In K. Palko and D.S. Lemmen (Eds.), Climate risks and adaptation practices for the Canadian transportation sector 2016 (pp. 27-64). Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada. 1 The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, ON Climate Risks & Adaptation Practices - For the Canadian Transportation Sector 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Findings .........................................................................................................................................................29 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................29 1.1 Regional overview .............................................................................................................................30 2.0 An introduction to Canada’s northern transportation system...............................................................31 2.1 System overview ................................................................................................................................31 2.2 Road transportation ..........................................................................................................................33 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • CZN Comments on Final Arguments
    September 16, 2011 Chuck Hubert Environmental Assessment Officer Mackenzie Valley Review Board Suite 200, 5102 50th Avenue, Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N7 Dear Mr. Hubert RE: Environmental Assessment EA0809-002, Prairie Creek Mine Comments on Final Arguments Canadian Zinc Corporation (CZN) is pleased to provide the attached comments on the Final Arguments submitted by parties at the conclusion of environmental assessment EA0809-002. Technical replies are provided, where necessary, by stating CZN’s position with respect to recommendations made. Where recommendations are unchanged from Technical Reports, the Review Board is directed to CZN’s comments on Technical Reports in Attachment 1. The contents of Attachment 1 should be read first since context is provided for some of our responses to the Final Arguments. Please note that our comments on Technical Reports contain no new information, and no timeline was provided by the Review Board for their submission. Also attached is a final commitments table (Table 1), and the curricula vitae of the main individual consultants who provided deliverables for the environmental assessment process. Yours truly, CANADIAN ZINC CORPORATION David P. Harpley, P. Geo. VP, Environment and Permitting Affairs Suite 1710-650 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6B 4N9 Tel: (604) 688-2001 Fax: (604) 688-2043 E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.canadianzinc.com COMMENTS ON PARTY FINAL ARGUMENTS Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) Water Management and Storage Recommendation 2: Final selection of an additional water storage option must be done in conjunction with the determination of Site Specific Water Quality Objectives for Prairie Creek. If increased capacity associated with construction of an additional pond provides for the ability to meet Reference Condition Approach benchmarks as defined within the derivation process, that option must be selected and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • NWT Transportation Report Card 2015 Is Intended to Provide a Statistical Benchmark of Progress Achieved and an Evaluation Framework to Measure Future Progress
    TABLED DOCUMENT 345-17(5) TABLED ON OCTOBER 7, 2015 Table of Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................3 Strengthening Connections .....................................................................................................5 Capturing Opportunities ...........................................................................................................9 Embracing Innovation ............................................................................................................ 11 Metrics & Data .........................................................................................................................13 1.0 Financial .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Capital and O&M Expenditures and Revenue .............................................. 13 1.2 Analysis of Capital Needs ............................................................................ 14 1.3 Major Partnership Funding ........................................................................... 15 1.4 Airport, Road Licensing and Deh Cho Bridge Toll Revenues ....................... 16 1.5 Northern, Local, Other, contracts and Total Value of Contracts .................... 18 1.6 Community Access Program Expenditures ................................................. 18 2.0 Airports ....................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Bathurst Caribou Range Plan Land Use Scenarios and Economic Considerations
    Bathurst Caribou Range Plan Supporting Report: Land Use Scenarios and Economic Considerations January 2018 2 | P a g e Acknowledgements The Bathurst Caribou Range Plan (BCRP) Project Team is grateful to community members and members of the Working Group who provided generous contributions of time, knowledge, insight, guidance, and encouragement. The Project Team is led by Karin Clark (Government of the Northwest Territories) and includes Dan Ohlson (Compass Resource Management), Shawn Francis (FSR Consulting), John Nishi (EcoBorealis Consulting) and Natasha Thorpe (Trailmark Systems/Thorpe Consulting Services). The Government of Northwest Territories Department of Environment and Natural Resources is serving as overall sponsor of the BCRP. Polar Knowledge Canada is also providing generous funding support to the planning process. Disclaimer This is a technical supporting document to the Bathurst Caribou Range Plan (BCRP). It describes the methods used and technical information considered or created while developing the BCRP. The audience for this report is intended to be technical specialists—a plain language summary has not been produced as key information is included in the Plan. This report does not represent the results of community engagement nor Government policy direction. Separate supporting documents have been created for caribou range assessment technical information and traditional knowledge. This document should be cited as follows: Bathurst Caribou Range Plan, Supporting Report: Land Use Scenarios and Economic Considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • EA1415-01 Developer's Assessment Report
    DEVELOPER’S ASSESSMENT REPORT ALL SEASON ROAD PROJECT PRAIRIE CREEK MINE MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 3 SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF: Environmental Assessment of Prairie Creek Mine EA 1415-01 SUBMITTED TO: Mackenzie Valley Review Board Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N7 SUBMITTED BY: Canadian Zinc Corporation Vancouver, BC V6B 4N9 April 2015 PROJECT FACT SHEET CORPORATE DATA Project Name Prairie Creek Mine Company Name and Address Canadian Zinc Corporation Suite 1710, 650 West Georgia Street Vancouver, B.C., V6B 4N9 Telephone: (604) 688-2001 Fax: (604) 688-2043 Canadian Zinc Corporation 9926-101st Avenue PO Box 500 Fort Simpson, NT X0E 0N0 Telephone: (867) 695-3963 Fax: (867) 695-3964 Contacts Alan Taylor, Chief Operating Officer and VP Exploration David Harpley, VP Environment & Permitting Affairs Wilbert Antoine, Manager of Northern Development COMMUNITY DATA First Nation Territory Nahanni Butte Dene Band, Dehcho Nearest Community Nahanni Butte, 95 km south-east Other Communities Fort Liard, 165 km south-east Fort Simpson, 185 km east Land Claims Status In negotiation, Dehcho Process PROJECT DETAILS Location 550 km west of Yellowknife, NWT 61°33’ N latitude, 124°48’ W longitude Undertaking ~185 km all season road to the Liard Highway essentially using the existing, permitted winter road alignment Prairie Creek All Season Road Project – April 2015 1 GONDI AEK’ÉHZE ADLÁ Gondi Éhgonñæá Dii Prairie Creek Mine góhts’edi tå’a Góhdli Ndehé k’eh yunahnee tå’uh nît’i ii gots’ç xôh shíhtah á goæô. Káa azhô t’áh Canadian Zinc Corporation (CZN) gots’êh á agøht’e. K’õô 1980 kéhonñdhe ekúh á ndéh gozhíhe gots’êh satsõ kázhe gha seegúdlá agøht’e t’áh t’ahsíi met’áh alaeda thela á agøht’e.
    [Show full text]
  • Season's Greetings
    I’d like to congratulate the teams that worked on the University of Saskatchewan’s Livestock and Season’s Greetings Forage Centre of Excellence and Calgary Zoo Flood Mitigation projects. Both projects received Awards Thirty-two years ago, I started my career at of Excellence at the annual Canadian Consulting Associated Engineering. As a Design Engineer Engineering Awards. These awards are a testament working on bridges and transportation structures to our innovation and technical excellence. for the resource sector and municipalities, I wanted I’d also like to acknowledge our team who to design safe transportation infrastructure that worked on the Regina Bypass, which opened in supports our economy. Never did I imagine that October. This $1.88 billion project is the largest in three decades later, I would become President, and Saskatchewan’s history. As Owner’s Engineer, we then this year, President & CEO. Thank you to Kerry employed a One Company approach, drawing on Rudd, who retired this year as President & CEO, and the expertise of staff from across the country. Our our Board of Directors for their confidence in me. One Company approach is part of the success of One of my first actions as President was to embark Associated Engineering. on a new Strategic Plan, which we launched last In closing, I’d like to thank all our staff for their year. Themed Shaping our Shared Future, our vision contributions and dedication to our clients and the is to deliver creative solutions for a healthy, resilient projects they work on. Your service and creativity world, and, in doing so, create a meaningful legacy featured: are what differentiates us.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: Case Studies of Roads in Northern Canada
    CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND ADAPTATION: CASE STUDIES OF ROADS IN NORTHERN CANADA Robyn V. McGregor, M.Sc., P.Eng., Senior Transportation Engineer and Principal Consultant Masood Hassan, Ph.D., P.Eng., Senior Transportation Engineer Don Hayley, P.Eng., FEIC, Director - Arctic Resource Development EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd. Paper prepared for presentation at the “Climate Change and the Design and Management of Sustainable Transportation” Session of the 2008 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Toronto, Ontario 1 ABSTRACT Access to communities and resource developments in northern Canada often relies on a single all-weather or winter road. Warming trends in recent years can put these indispensable access routes at risk by impacting road structures that overlie permafrost, and by shortening the duration of winter roads built on ice or seasonally frozen ground. This paper presents two case studies of all-weather and winter roads in northern Canada to describe the issues pertaining to the impacts of climate change and the adaptation strategies that have been or are being implemented to cope with the impacts. 1. The Yellowknife Highway (NWT Highway 3) reconstruction. The design addressed those features of embankment performance over the long term that represent the greatest risk of uncontrolled maintenance and safety. The following features were adopted to mitigate climate change effects and retard the rate of thaw: a. The core of the embankment comprises a minimum of 2 metres of quarried rockfill, providing internal strength to even out future settlements; b. A sacrificial shoulder and flat sideslopes were provided on the embankment as it was recognized that the permafrost soils supporting the slopes would be the first to thaw; c.
    [Show full text]
  • NWT/NU Spills Working Agreement
    NORTHWEST TERRITORIES–NUNAVUT SPILLS WORKING AGREEMENT Updated October 2014 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page Cover Front Cover 1 Cover Inside Front Cover 2 Introductory Table of Contents 3 Introductory Record of Amendments 3 1. Introduction/Purpose/Goals 4 2. Parties to the Agreement 5 3. Letter of Agreement 6 - Background 6 - Lead Agency Designation and Contact 6 - Lead Agency Responsibilities 6 - General 7 4. Signatures of Parties to the Agreement 8 5. Glossary of Terms 9 Table 1A Lead Agency Designation for Spills in the NT and NU 10 Table 1B Lead Agency Designation for NT Airport Spills 14 Table 1C Lead Agency Designation for NU Airport Spills 14 Table 1D Territorial Roads and Highways in the NT 15 Table 1E Territorial Roads in NU 15 Table 2 General Guidelines for Assessing Spill Significance and Spill File Closure 16 Table 3 Spill Line Contract and Operation 17 Appendix A Schedule 1 - Reportable Quantities for NT-NU Spills 18 Appendix B Spill Line Report Form 20 Appendix C Instructions for Completing the NT/NU Spill Report Form 21 Appendix D Environmental Emergencies Science Table (Science Table) 22 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS * No. Amendment Description Entered By / Date Approved By / Date 1 GNWT spills response structure changed on April 1. 2014 to reflect the changes of devolution. Departments of Industry Tourism and Investment and Lands were added to the NT/NU SWA 2 Environment Canada nationally restructured their spill response structure in 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 * Starting in 2015, the NT/NU SWA will be reviewed and updated annually during the Fall NT/NU Spills Working Group meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Deh Cho Bridge (Canda)
    Project information Deh Cho Bridge (Canda) Project description mageba scope Highlights & Facts The Deh Cho Bridge, located in Canada’s mageba was awarded the contract to de- Northwest Territories, was completed in sign and manufacture the modular expan- mageba products: the fall of 2012. The $202 million cable sion joints required at each end of the Type: TENSA®MODULAR LR stayed bridge spans the Mackenzie River Deh Cho Bridge. mageba provided an 11 expansion joints of types near Fort Providence, replacing an exist- gap TENSA®MODULAR expansion joint at LR8 and LR11 ing ferry service in the summer, and an one abutment, and an 8 gap modular ex- Installation: 2010–2012 ice crossing route in the winter. The Deh pansion joint at the other. These modular Cho Bridge is the only permanent cross- expansion joints, reliable in the most ex- Structure: ing of the Mackenzie River. The structure treme conditions of northern Canada, are Location: Northwest Territories, ensures that the region to the north will able to facilitate movements of up to 35 in Canada not be cut off from southern Canada for (889 mm). In addition, they are also excep- Completed: 2012 an annual 8 week period, when forming tionally flexible, allowing movements in Type: Cable stayed bridge or melting ice, not strong enough to carry every direction as well as limited rotations Length: 3,642 ft (1,100 m) the ice road, prevents the passage of the about every axis. Contractor: Ruskin ferry. The new 0.68 mi (1.1 km) long bridge has nine spans of lengths ranging between 294 ft (90 m) and 624 ft (190 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report
    Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report July 2010 July 2010 Page 1 Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report: The Sahtu Settlement Area The Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report The Sahtu Land Use Plan Background Report, from now on referred to as the “Background Report”, is intended to capture some of the main characteristics of the Sahtu Settlement Area (SSA), its people, the culture, special places, the biophysical environment, the economy and the regulatory regime. Above all, the Background Report should help readers better understand the Sahtu and the reports and information that were considered in the development, decisions, and planning that resulted in the Sahtu Land Use Plan (SLUP). Introduction The Sahtu Land Use Plan was written by taking into account the three pillars of sustainability: socio-cultural, economic and ecological factors. These three domains are now commonly considered part of a balanced approach to decision-making. The background report is an attempt to briefly describe some of the social, cultural, economic and ecological factors that the Sahtu Land Use Planning Board (SLUPB) has considered in its decision making. INAC’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2007-2010 describes sustainable communities as those which “enjoy a prosperous economy, a vibrant and just society, and a healthy environment for current and future generations.”1 The Sahtu Land Use Planning Board has sought to develop a balanced plan for the Sahtu Settlement Area (SSA) by considering a diversity of resources under each of the three pillars. A summary of the sources used and a general description of the Sahtu Settlement Area follow.
    [Show full text]