Northern Hub Northern Chord Ordsall

Subchapter Numbers | 1 Page [P06.2]

Subchapter Numbers A-RER-A-000001

NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WP

January 2016 doc. no. Design Guide Project - Ordsall Chord - Ordsall Project northern hub northern Chord Ordsall

Subchapter Numbers e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 2 Page C C M S L C A Design Guide Design

APPENDICES A - B - ontrol rust of staining report - C oncrete finishes report(Concrete Society) D - Porter) (Gustafson Landscape proposals OSI - E taged submission drawings F - Schedulesighting G - rime Impact Assessment ncillary Equipment Report RELATED DOCUMENTS MortonEd Schedule listed Works of structures Ordsall assessment impact Crime Chord Schedule listed to structures Works of Conservation Management Plan drawings) associated Assessment (and Transport drawings) associated report (and Drainage Archaeology Crime Impact Statement Code Construction of practice (CoCP) report land Contaminated planEcology

Subchapter Numbers 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 8 8 8 9 9 9 47 10 37 28 40 39 84 96 112 151 133 ground ground [ [ [ [ [ [ D [ S S O C H S R I Ac E D T U O S T O Back I

3.6 3.6 3.7 Stage F] Middlewood Viaduct Stage Salford G] Central Victoria to Station 3.2 3.3 and Viaducts Zig-zag Stage 1830 B] 3.4 Bridge Stephenson’s C] Stage 3.5 Stage River D] Irwell banks and Princes’ Bridge Stage E] Network bridges arch Way and Trinity 3.0 3.0 3.1 ESIGN DEVELOPMENT Stage Castlefield A] ViaductWater Streetand 2.10 2.11 pecific project wide elements 2.12 tages Plan -Condition 2 rdsall Glossary Chord and terminology 2.7 2.7 2.8 rime Impact Assessment -Condition 13 2.9 eritage Assets -Condition 14 election and specification11 of materials - Condition 2.3 2.3 2.4 ail infrastructure requirements 2.5 design ntegrated 2.6 cessibility -Condition 5 nvironmental Issues 2.0 2.0 2.1 CONSIDERATIONS ESIGN 2.2 he Project Design Philosophy rban Design Objectives 1.4 1.4 1.5 bjectives cope 1.1 1.1 1.2 he Design Guide 1.3 ther Related Documents Subchapter Numbers 1.0 NTRODUCTION Contents Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C

ross orth, c N

he anchester January 2016 t

M n i

irection) nter-continental d i

f o rewe), irport

a C ach

work n via i (

net

ignificant outh three s ( ith

w r

ost he t m hou

orth

he t rom

ach f he t e

n i

rains irport t ervices

irport A s

a ix

nly han o

catering for more passengers for catering northern other the all than airports combined and an important transport region entire the for hub scheduled servicesthe by Department and is identified for (DfT)Transport delivering in airport international as a key gateway a sustainable transport system. Airport can beonly or passing reached reversing through, by Services operating central through Manchester at, Piccadilly. Manchester Victoria,station, other currently Manchester’s cannot directly airport. reach the station which are six outside lines the Manchester Piccadilly as station ‘throat’. referred the to • Manchester • It he • Other • Currently Each train entering Manchester Piccadilly has a three minute spacing spacing hasEach Manchester a three minute train entering Piccadilly period a safe time of provide its order timetabled in path to into built and distancebetween services. crossing the of nature the Due to are and Manchester out of Piccadilly into routes the movement, is crossing the movement are fromwhilst being utilised prevented being minutes This capacity 18 constraint equates to underway. capacity. available overall the of almost a third per hour, employed services times trains Piccadilly, variability arrive at the the in Due to clear. to path heldare Ardwick at routinely an Junction for available This requires a measure performance of the into be built to time as referredtimetable a performance to This requires allowance. to route impacts on services which are Trans-Pennine using the proceed. a clear signal to The industry await to Leeds also which have within type provision plans this additional for activity including of by which could timetable otherwisethe be occupied operation the with a train service.of apartQuite from these timetabled performance during allowances, 9,163 of a total 2013 November to 2012 calendarthe November year performanceseparate been six trains caused the incidents have by These incidents equate each hour. throat which cross Piccadilly the of a total to amounting station, the at delay overall the of 26% to passengers operations to and lost to delay minutes and 35,923 goods. The loss impact caused the resulting capacity in by Manchester at services route and inability the to Piccadilly Manchester through ManchesterVictoria Airport to a connection of lack the to due between two main rail corridors the fundamental is the cause the of Manchester capacityoverall problem.

Subchapter Numbers he hat T t

rans- . t

ervices ervices s s ransport

T anchester

ider ail ervices M r

w s

he t

anchester dditional n i M a

ritical c

otential nd anchester’s rth-south p a he

t no

f aluable nd o v eds

ovements

Le m reater

ost

fficient G m

peed

s n rain i

xisting he | 3

e f nd etween

o a

uch b

Page

rovide s he

t p

f a o t

onflicting

ervices s requency

f velopment alue

v de

he dentified everal i t s

he he mpossible t i t n

Design Guide Design Innovation Fund bid work, where rail is seen as having to play play where bid work, rail is seen to as Fund having Innovation and growth support development to role an expanding city’s the alongside complementary measures; across connect Manchester with employment to areas low of areas opportunity; employment of and areaHub affects that performance the network the reliability of North the in destinations accessability these trains of to key Manchester including AirportWest capacity by across is limited Manchester. link the North’s eight City eight Regions; North’s the link increase rail could access to bethat provided Manchester to Airport; support and to network grow which needs bePennine able to to urban network services centres; of an integrated key many to • had een • make • results • Trans-Pennine • constrain • impede • reduce There is no direct link between Manchester’s two largestThere stations, between is no direct link Manchester’s the This to is due Manchester Victoria and Manchester Piccadilly. networkthe and associatedjunctions. rail the railway of configuration Connection which performing can be only made by move a lengthy Salford Crescent a train to station where of routing the require would Ordsall direction then Such be of the reversed in a Junction. it would a significanteffect have on capacity. would movement issues need beThe addressed following to The emergence Manchester of Airport transport as a key node in great to any networkrail existing the reflected regionin is not the degree. The current rail access airport the to has been added onto and is sub-optimal largelythe Victorianlayout as a consequence. and across restrict Manchester, The alignments now movement in This increase to the ability rail capacity. limit significantly thus turn is a veryof significant regeneration the constraint on potential enhanced rail usage. its 2009In report, The Northern identified Manchester Hub as Way whole the most rail for in single criticalthe infrastructure investment North the of rail network the central in of because limitations the of which: Manchester,

Subchapter Numbers Introduction 1.3 Background rail key a network 14 NorthThethe of cities of by are linked recognised be a rail to corridors on Manchester, which converge These urban regional services and inter inter (Manchesterhub hub). express servicesare supplemented by North the to and South of country. the infrastructure area Manchester the in of andThe Salford railway economic the requirements the Driven by of 1830. to back dates form a combined to rail network intended and not was it was time a largely in piecemealdeveloped different fashion by commercial operators. restricts configuration now infrastructure’s the of The nature the ability limits and significantly thus across Manchester, movement increase rail capacityto and serve adequately changed transport Thisnodes turn is a very region. in the in significant constraint on economic growth. to contribute rail network the to of potential the 1.2 Documents Other Related report, this of page contents on the As there are a number noted of been prepared enable discharge documents the other have to that Consent Where and Conditions. Listed Building relevant Planning of these are cross-referred document, and this as in a consequence to are included asthey an appendix. Subchapter Numbers 1.1 Guide Design The to related information The provide purpose document this is to of Ordsall design the a projectthe of Chord, proposed Network by The Irwell proposedRiver straddles and Rail. the hence works The Design Guide is affects Salford and Manchester. both in sites heart the sit the at documents provide to of that intended a suite of building and required discharge planning listed the of for information Transportto ActWorks Orderrelating & as conditions definedthe in is included conditions planning the project. as section of this A list document this of 2.9

1.0 Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 4 Page Design Guide Design Whilst the Ordsall the Whilst Chord has a significant economic andfinancial benefit, further more substantial benefits can be realised a as result operation change Manchester the the in of Victoriaof which the Ordsall Chord provides. corridors all capable connecting of Now to Manchester Victoria will per train a hour largely operation, to terminus from being a 17 move trainsfacility each being hour. capable 42 accepting of The increase services in a series infrastructure of follow will enhancements as part Northern the of programme Hub works of Level High 2012 beenrecognised have which Government’s the in the total enhancedOutput Specification.In capacitythe networkof trainseach 700 an additional close to be capableproviding of will corridors. key spread 14 across the day of all effect the shift quantum Overall, this of service in is provision assessed UK economy the as a result to billion as generating £4.2 goods. for more passenger paths freight of and improved journeys connection the Without and capacity increase Ordsall which the provide. Chord will

Subchapter Numbers t a ill a

he t w

ve o rdsall t

assing ha ich O etween

p emoved b racks r

an anchester wh he

M irectly is

he d t ub

ithout

H erated

outes w r

round op ross a iccadilly

ictoria c e P V

rea ottleneck t o a b apacity t

anchester c

lectrified

e he M a t

f rains

t he o anchester t wly

anchester

ervices M n M or i

ne s

he t rom ed f

whenever f irect ( ne o d

egeneration ottleneck w apacity ross-Manchester r rains he

c b t c t

ne f

he f o t he

a o o t

eliability erate u r dvantage or

f a

o t f

r c f

Introduction Victoria (which includes the redevelopment of the station); and station); the of includes redevelopment Victoria the (which delivery the Northern the of Chord facilitates programme Hub across economic North. unlock the the potential which will performance improves) connect Leeds Liverpool Manchester via Victoria; to Airport Manchester Airport and places such Halifax, as Bradford, and Rochdale Todmorden Manchester Piccadilly; be effect provided extra will train paths positive many on how increase the frequency in servicesand of allow easing thus passenger Manchester through Piccadilly, congestion station as the at more passengers the come into Manchester Victoriacurrently Station; under-used • by lleviating • improved • takes • complements ull • ability • provision • the • reeing the reation • the emoval 1.5 Scope The the benefitsof Ordsall Chord increased are performanceof opportunityand risk the Manchesterthe Piccadilly mitigate to furtherof services caused the delay by the of crossing throat the Servicesstation. Manchester via be routed be able to now will and Victoria Calder connections and the Valley additional include to routes. Trans-Pennine benefitsthe of Ordsall Chord are: The key The Ordsall Chord rail link will provide the capability connect the to provide The the Ordsall will Chord rail link rail corridors serving and Manchester Manchester Victoria Piccadilly across option rail routing a new stations so and doing provides in support will routing Thisnew changea operation in at city. the Manchester see Victoria station operating and the predominantly will a terminus. of as station instead a through servicesThe route ability to remove across will city the such in way a needthe services for Manchester cross of Piccadilly throat the to releasing capacity to central Manchester within and key and is the Manchesterthe Hub. Subchapter Numbers 1.4 Objectives

1.0 Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 4 1 2 3 destrian, cycle and vehicle routes Pe H I W L

1. 2. 3. 4. ampson Street rwell Park River is well-established,each these Whilst routes Ordsall of the Chord Street ater benefits provide and projectenhancethem. will iverpool of Road each fig. 2.2.i fig. The Ordsall routes a series Chord structuresexisting of sit over which run perpendicularin north-west south-east to and south-west north-east to 2.2.i): figure directions (see

Subchapter Numbers ill nd w

eries erms t ail s

n i ean l

w istinctive

det

d a

ne a

nd re

a a a

enefits ffer b

o hey

reate aterial c hey

m t

f ill assive o alford w

S ites

nd hey ffers t hoice a

o c

| 5 heir t

roject p

Page egeneration r anchester

he treetscape t M s

roximity o ocal

l p

f o

ontext c

entres c

urrounding ontext ity s c

i c

t t t a t

Design Guide Design be appropriate in their setting their be in appropriate alongside heritage structures of economicof opportunity and regeneration structureseffective and urban existing use of space andidentity unique act designas their a through forms, to catalyst surrounding for regeneration realm spaces public a of connecting two cities, which (as the area the more attractive, make point) previous the of continuation encouraging pedestrian use and street life • In he mmediate Of the existing structures,Of bridgethe existing designedfit forms the were to arches and include skew to specificconstraints their of context trusses finishes paint various inserted and with colours) (decorated as wider spans between plain viaducts. The comparatively viaducts into thousands bricks went of way; own are their also in impressive their by context. alignments influenced sometimeseach, twisting to The Ordsall a series Chord proposals create structures of will and spaces perform that across context a variety their in role a positive differentof scales: • In • In egional • he In he • In he Developing the issues the particular in describedDeveloping fourth the above, bullet a sequence form create project an spaces the inter- of point, will to north. the connect south to This fromconnecting the will the route Irwell River south bank,original Manchester Liverpool Station, Road site. ECF and Bridge, Irwell Park the River Prince’s new Quays,

Subchapter Numbers ail he he ub r t t

w n o i t round,

a ne

nformed i f

o ites

s ve orthern

ritical ealm N r

ha c

he is t

f rban nsertion i o ensitive

s widened

he t t tructures

s ost

or f nd

m tructures been a

he mblematic t deal i e xisting

f have e e

o waterways

carriageway b b

he o t ill structures

t ne roposed

w o

p which dual

canal

a is

nfrastructure,

he t ite ridge and Way railway

ail

b r

roposed i p

viaducts his he

rch t river t ocation is

l a

f f

Trinity

o o

existing uality the

q the

work

on existing

l h v l net

D project Network aspirations of Rail and long-term the success project, the design core and of of the development is at is an part integral Ordsall act the as Chord a will design; the of regeneration catalyst global evolution of the railway the of evolution global and enriched design the process history on the rail use of of overlaid next layer the infrastructure; site the • over • • on • sat above • The • Holistic • The egacy • The • The istoric • This alues ocation 2.1 The Project Design Philosophy Northern overall the Within programme, intervention Hub other no has importance a similar Ordsall the its function, terms Chord of in to aesthetic or aspirations: Subchapter Numbers 2.2 Urban Objectives Design TheOrdsall Chord project offers an opportunity new a provide to appreciation important of heritage assets which currently are in lesserpoor or condition are shielded by structures. from view area the has of beenThe value historic a majorthe influence on proposeddesign the of immediate the structures terms of in both the Liverpool Station and Road of of also wider the context context perimeter encircling Salfordand of the Manchester, industrialof role the city define viaducts that centres. railway connect Ordsall Chord to is going two existing an urbanAt level, sequences between a link viaducts Piccadilly & bridges of provide to The proposed alignment previously. and Victoria has existed that not a leanand and structural sustainable forms approach the have in proposed Very little the urban of context. and structure historic is majority the the of space’; be termed might what ‘open locatedin is: railway

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 2 3 ublic realm spaces P 1

I Z L

1. 2. 3. rwell park River –Heart City the of (South) a particular these beEach spaces given of will identity arches through plazaig-zag restored heritage of quality high fabric, integration to the finishes Station iverpool Road engineering structures and realm landscape public features. fig. 2.2.iv fig. The nodes and points of interest are grouped together into three Theare groupednodes into interest andtogether of points 2.2.iv): spaces realm (figure public individual

Subchapter Numbers 4 3 | 6 1 Page 5 oints of interest 2 P

N S S M W i

Design Guide Design

fig. 2.2.i fig.i 1. 2. 3. 4. orth bankabutment 5. Bridge terrace tephenson’s bankabutmentouth The characteristic aspects uses future each of space and potential entrance west OSI design proposals been into specificto eachlocation. developed have Street gateway ater Also along the routes are specific points of interest (figure 2.2.iii), 2.2.iii), Also(figure are specific routes interest alongof the points represent not which do a decision-making or point change in offer but instead direction, spaces particular individual with features:

Subchapter Numbers 2 3 1 odes / junctions N

P H W i

At each these positions of pedestrianAt accessibility and cyclist is to be enhanced, as part realm enhancements. public of 1. 2. 3. rinces bridge Irwell /River Park Street ampson Street /Water Street /Liverpoolater Road The routes interconnect at node positions (figure 2.2.ii) that form that 2.2.ii) The interconnect node routes at positions (figure betweenjunctions each: Subchapter Numbers 2.2.i fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 7 Page otential riverside walk P

Design Guide Design fig. 2.2.vi fig.

Subchapter Numbers 4 2 3 ccommodating future change A 5 1

D C P W A T

fig. 2.2.v fig. 3. 4. riverside boardwalk potential onnection to 5. Manchester site Quays to link otential as be part delivered will these works none of the of above, As noted 2.2.vi) (fig. along Manchesteralkway river bankof been proposals designed the have however Ordsall Chord works; such maximum that to hasthe enable flexibility been integrated these spaces their with into tie to adjacent sites of developers schemes. and stakeholders other to each area incorporates flexibility the thesethe includepotential 2.2.v); changeaccommodate future (figure connections future for and should legal funding agreements permit: 1. 2. canalLocks basin ccess Middlewood to site along ECF owpath Subchapter Numbers Through neighbouringconsultation with land-owners, developers

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 heelchair accessible routes W

fig. 2.5.i fig.

Subchapter Numbers | 8 Page Design Guide Design

2.5 Accessibility with Equality (compliance Condition - 5 Act) access The purposeimprove the to defining of Ordsall Chord is the and northern cities of between however, towns the England; structures support that bridges the andviaducts interface the with spaces public the around locations. various Inevitably ground in infrastructure. importantAn the railway areby influencedthe of aim scheme enhance design current the is to experiences rail users, of pedestrians and cyclists. between tightly weave structure will proposedthe of The railway route an produce constraintsvarious a design to to appropriate solution proposed the of bridges footprint the Muchis urbanof context. river the structures, or positioned existing over alongside or above Thisor roads. means Ordsall the that Chord has little adverse impact and pedestrian redevelopment for space. landon available the scheme design the the of has been to facilitate an urge to A key character the the of improve life, public for environment a positive regenerate area the expressed to impetus the in add to area and to local policy. planning anelegant with The Ordsall cross level, high at Chord through will form haswhich been sympathy designedbe and in distinctive to pedestrian with routes, and integrate cycle its neighbourswith To function Bridge, no longer which serveshighway its intended Prince’s pedestrian The be structure. replaced new and a new will with and bridge addressescycle needs the pedestrians, all and of cyclists movement wheelchair connections existing users to improved with patterns.

Subchapter Numbers nterpretation i

odern supports

subframe

ithout w

structural

materials

irectly d

outside

orms f

sheeting the

with

istorical h

f o

finishes

• Applied • Copying structures and historic buildings listed of context The distinctive requires standards high design of qualityproposals the for on the Ordsall This quality Chord. aspects is inherent all in design the of from large-scalesolutions qualities material the forms to through anddetailed interfaces. Thebest engineering cannot solutions to and the around clutter uncoordinated fixed by be down let structures.The basic design the function proposals look beyond change accommodate future and be structures, able to the of to adaptation. Theappearance term long structures the and of has maintenance been considered design the in process ensure structures that to appearance. their retain • Over-cladding 2.4 Integrated design the following a strategy Considering above, factors various the listed engineering a design chosen, with approach was railway of tradition robust andof honestly expressed surfaces; externally visible the surfaces structure primary the are the of structural materials. ‘dishonest’ a comparatively considered take was It to inappropriate proposed the approach structures to such as: Rail infrastructure requirements infrastructure Rail on eitherexisting modifiedThe Ordsall be elevated Chord will structures structures or line associated new with overhead link will It equipmentequipment, junction plant, and signalling. (between line Bolton Ordsall the Lane lines; railway two existing Chat Moss the line and (between andjunction) junction Castlefield Ordsall The Lane Ordsall Chord and junction Deal Street junction). comprisewill 30mph twin each junctions at and the end tracks are designed permit to parallel movements. Subchapter Numbers 2.3

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 2.7 13) Condition (Planning Impact Crime The scheme design the of has been appraised and a Crime Impact Assessment has An been Greater Manchester conducted Police. by processaccompanying British the Transport consultation with of has also being undertakenPolice parallel. in Crime Impact the stages has reviewed Thefollowing design the for local the authorities Assessment BTP, and stakeholder (from input addressand an MOSI) to outstanding issues, these the include anti social anti behavior, deter to / railings gating of introduction to archesfencinggraffiti and to materials, enhanced coatings specific realm spaces. public to The design lighting measures taken each project stage the within of has been the identifiedof in each sections follow. that ensure construction the will to team continue will Further works process.secure build materials during the all concernsMeasures mitigate raised Greater manchester to police by Crime impact the assessment been in addressed(GMP) have (CIA) areas. indvidual Sectionin to 3, 2.8 14) Condition (Planning Assets Heritage A detailed analysis and design specific of elementsof proposals which affect or setting their forms building part listed the of managementConversation plan Secton 2.5.

Subchapter Numbers | 9 Page A C E S P T Nu N Design Guide Design

- – CoCP the addendum to This following includes, the 7 -Condition rchaeology: Scheme Written Investigation of 8 Construction -Condition ode of Practice (CoCP) - - - - xternal programme; Communications - Management Plan; Waste ite - and incidentplan; control prevention ollution raffic ManagementPlan; Land- Contaminated 9 - Condition isance Management Plan; 10 - Ecology - Condition oise and Vibration management plan. 2.6 Environmental As part discharge a submission conditions planning the to of assessmentsnumber environmental been of produced have the for informedThese design. the proposals are: which have

Subchapter Numbers

urfaced s

mproving i ppearance w

extended. a

it l

and ith

nd heir t a w

hat t long

leaned re-graded c uch

ntroduced, i

signed epaired, replaced, r

b de

e be

ill b e

w b

will ill

ill w

rossings c

surfaces

acades f

D compliments the historic fabric. fabric. historic compliments the routes. cycling visibility in the public realm public visibility the in • New • Pedestrian tructures • Historic • Pavement The development will create a series of streets and plazas. To a series create streets and of will plazas.The development To be exposed Bridge to is to enhance Stephenson’s realm, public the Further to a century. has been not that possible over for a way in view prominence. greater be befitthis a manner restored in it is to to this ownership, private out of be infrastructuretaken will Formerrailway maintenance. long term of level a greater restored and brought into surrounding streetscape. the in role an active then play will They unappealingPresently and structures unattractive and spaces will be transformed means: various through Subchapter Numbers There access are issues to areas. various in relating certain In constraints result ramps in places which are steeper level than recommended alternative by gradients, but these are mitigated this of example One 2.5.i). adjacentareas in provided fig. routes (see landings the adjacent to river areas the is the Salford bank of on the bridges. cycle / and foot utilities new the of a sequence create The streets authorised of and will plazas works running around original from Liverpool the station around Road structures,various across Irwell the canal and the ending at before As site. (ECF) development Fund Cities English south the endthe of Ordsall be the a seriesa result of Chord there will high-quality, of pedestrian-focussed spaces connect that Salford and Manchester, benefit historic gaining the of and character the combination from fabric insertions. and new

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 The selection and assessment materials has been of undertaken in project the close conjunction with stakeholders seek to agreement specification. eachon individual a variety in steel and The concrete of major structures utilise will text finishes. Thesefocussed materials following are the two in on and images.

Subchapter Numbers | 10 Page Design Guide Design Some proposed stages works, all materials are the common of to and others areto specificspecific areas. former The category are the and images; text further in explained following the detail in specific the in latterstagesare materials the covered of in group the of layout the explains latter sections report. this of 2.8.i Figure samples sections the area of and cross-refers relevant the to this design guide.

Subchapter Numbers D sketch of samples area at Water Street compound 3

D fig. 2.9.i fig. Subchapter Numbers 2.9 11 -Condition materials of specificationSelection and The Ordsall Chord project proposes variety a wide materials of assist with across structural elements To and realm features. public a samples area (materials) processthe discharging consent of 11 Street. This area incorporates hasbeen numerous Water at set up proposals. the to samples which are relevant This sampling process heritage also incorporates to structures, works Appendixfurther in 3 (Specificationfor is available which detail of Conservation the of Repairs) Fabric Management Plan.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers hotograph of parapet sample (relevant stages to A and F) p

| 11 Page fig. 2.9.iii fig. Design Guide Design The welding of individual steel sheets to one another will be produced one another sheets will steel individual to of The welding same the useadjacentassteel material sheets. the of the through colour a similar across whole the to down gradually weather This will During discussions stakeholders with assembly. about network the effect weld - xi)the darkening roughthe of 2.9.ii arch sample (fig. partial a the of grinding surfacesraised was as a concern. However, is proposed soften visual affect. weld this to shortA section the of has the beenat mannerthis (visible in ground on fig.2.9.xvii weld image). the centre of the proposed undertake is not to It welds to the grind of a full This processadjacentthe aresteel. flushwith wherepoint they is considered produce an appearance aesthetic inferior to as it surface. the of produces an ‘dishing’ inconsistent

Subchapter Numbers D view of parapet detail (relevantstages to A and F) 3

D 2.9.1 - proposed Materials Steelwork ream public is proposed the in visible two finishes, in Steelwork Thebe former utilised and steel galvanised steel. weathering will primary the for latter structuralthe is structure; elements the of proposed use for on secondary where and elements.how, Details of each reference in to used each material was below is provided why specific location. This section document the samples combines the of of photographs been prepared have alongsidethat diagrams 3D which place them together. fit elements the will how and explain context in been undertakenA seriestests have graffiti of the steel on removal a process ensure Networkand maintainabilityto have Rail which is achievable. Subchapter Numbers 2.9.ii fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 equential images show to development of patina on urface of weathering steel (18/12/14) S s

fig. 2.9.vii fig.

Subchapter Numbers | 12 Page equential images show to development of patina on urface of weathering steel (11/12/14) S s

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9vi fig.

Subchapter Numbers equential images show to development of patina on isualisation of network arch crossing the River Irwell (relevant stage to section E; denoted in red has been prepared as full a size sampleas shown in fig. xi - xvii) urface of weathering steel (19/11/14) S s V

D fig. 2.9.v fig. Subchapter Numbers 2.9.iv fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 artial grinding of welds (centre of image) reduce to P

‘shadowing’ effect of rough surface fig. 2.9.xi fig.

Subchapter Numbers | 13 Page equential images show to development of patina on urface of weathering steel (02/07/15) S s

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.x fig.

Subchapter Numbers ssembly of elements making up the sample arch section shown in photographs The below. arch will be made up of 3 sections welded equential images show to development of patina on urface of weathering steel (19/05/15) S s A

D together; this weld (visible on these images) is of the same steel specification as the arch sections, and hencewill graduallyweather to the same Alsocolour. visible on the photographs is an inconsistency of tone resulting from the internal diaphragm plates; this too istemporary a effect. fig. 2.9.ix fig. Subchapter Numbers 2.9.viii fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 14 Page oncrete finishes (lower image indicates final choice of surfaces across skewback and spandrel) c

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xivfig.

Subchapter Numbers oncrete samples oncrete with acid etched and smooth finishes c c

D fig. 2.9.xiifig. fig. 2.9.xiiifig. Materials proposed - - proposed Materials Concrete series large- an elements of work, extensive As other the with of beenscalematerial samples prepared enable project the have to and considerphysical visual, the to stakeholders) (including team constructability aspects proposals. the of The these is location of Street. a dedicated The area earlierwithin off section Water 2.9 describedprinciples and material the are structure of proposed.that Subchapter Numbers 2.9.2

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 15 Page arious pier and abutment forms proposed for Ordsall Chord structures v

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xvfig.

Subchapter Numbers he t

rban n i u

urface ighting l

s ollected

e nd a b

ealm

r o

t ariations

v mportant i

ublic exture rack t t p

t he

t nd

o a t

olour,

nto c ncorporate i

n i

ighways alling f h

moothly ppropriate or s a f

ater

ariations

v w an

outes eed r f hat

t o

t isguise anguage

l d

ails o t abling ipes

c det p

a a

D & telecoms & betweenvariation pre-cast and concrete in-situ width and alignment of the original viaducts, as well as curve the original viaducts,the asand of well width alignment structures existing the planin of street level to and subsequently down facades created by the Northern the facades created by project Hub • The bility • Interface • Drainage • Electrical • An esthetic A variety different of pier and be abutment formed forms will from the and for a selectionthese forms), of 2.9.xv figure (see concrete provide: been to developed designs have Subchapter Numbers stagesIn and steel are proposed A and weathering concrete F historic the to widening form of the structuresas new which take but separated adjacent to, immediately concrete the viaduct (with been applied for have The principles above structure). new from the viaducts the (see of widening the and metal concrete use to the of 2.9.xvii). and 2.9.xvi fig. The supporting piers be from formed concrete are to situ from in 2.9.xviii arch the (fig. of springing point the ground to up the below changes latter concrete use the the from of point At and 2.9.xix). 2.9.xx) above precast, (fig. to in-situ spandrel namely wall outer the as the known archthe and underside (also the arch the vaults of be formed will constraints from a each vault size Due to intrados). Each precast arch 2.9.xix). series fig. rings (see concrete separate of effect in is which springingpoint the ‘skewback’, a sitinto sectionwill Castlefield (Stage the Viaduct the skewbacks each A) For of arch. be pre-castwill piers in-situ the elements of concrete sat (fig. on top be poured will Viaduct skewbacks the Middlewood along the 2.9.xxi; as per concrete as pier insitu the below.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Arch installed New foundations

Subchapter Numbers Pier separating layer separating Pier Spandrel separating layer 2. Foundations 4. concrete elements Precast | 16 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers Significant defects stabilised Skewback installedSkewback Piers installed dressed back sequential diagrams illustrate to the modification of existing structures, followedby the construction of concrete archwidening and layingwaterproofing of slab with track on top Existing skewback Vegetation removed Vegetation

D 3. New piers New 3. 1. Repairs 1.

Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xvifig

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Remove track workRemove and ballast Take down parapet Take / part spandrel of Infillto replicate existing

Subchapter Numbers 6. removal Parapet 8. Finishing | 17 Page Track installed Track Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers sequential diagrams illustrate to the modification of existing structures, followedby the construction of concrete archwidening and layingwaterproofing of slab with track on top Waterproofing Waterproofing deck installed

Cast insitu fillto precast arches Steel parapet D 7. Waterproofing 7. 5. Insitu concrete

Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xviifig

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Precast concrete spandrel Drainage from track Outer surface actto as transition between and insitu (below) precast (above) finishes Metal plate cover concreteover channel/ slot (mill finished aluminium)

Subchapter Numbers Lighting strip external finishes to pier, skewback, spandrel and cover to inset services channel services inset to cover and spandrel skewback, pier, to finishes external lighting strip and pre-cast concrete spandrel panel to outer elevation outer to panel spandrel concrete pre-cast and strip lighting

fig 2.9.xxifig fig 2.9.xxfig | 18 Page Precast Concrete arches Design Guide Design Precast concrete skewback Precast concrete pier electrical and communication services Subchapter Numbers One brick offset concrete arches spanning between skewbacks between spanning arches concrete insitu pier with pre-cast skewback (springing block) on top D

Subchapter Numbers

One brick offset fig 2.9.xixfig fig 2.9.xviiifig 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 painted concrete finishes smooth concrete finishes concrete smooth textured concrete (on left)

fig 2.9.xxiii 2.9.xxiii fig fig 2.9.xxiifig fig 2.9.xxivfig

Subchapter Numbers a ve

an c ha

aint p chieving

nishes a fi

f o

ineral m

mooth f s eans o

m ith

ifferent d amples

re f | 19 oncentrations a o c

Page here eries T s

ifferent A

nishes: fi nishes:

nishes: fi

Design Guide Design been provided (see fig.2.9.xxii). These worked through differentthrough worked These been fig.2.9.xxii). (see provided finishesmixtures,techniques and pouring formwork self- before identified was the process as compacting concrete which could best the minor surface with balance finish a smooth provide of imperfectionsThis which reflectfinishesthe natural of concrete. is based inherent concrete colour in minor on variations the widerproposed the design of aesthetic as to being appropriate Northernthe masonry existing of and context Hub the structures. an even, to through wash from a light concrete, be applied to of surface method This finish. consistent finishing canprovide effects the negative benefits of a cheaper as it canmitigate finish a surfaceor concrete has which been to significant subject One the of formwork. of removal the repairamounts following of earlier samples concrete 3 on fig.i) prepared (number on site a poor quality how can concrete be has display been to painted masked2.9.xxiii). (fig. patterned a with formwork including in finish concrete, textured surfaceacid of with removal the (through acid-etching liner, retarded or formwork) of surfaces removal the following finishes prior inner formwork the faces the is applied of a liquid to (where Three 2.9.xxiv). on being fig. poured, as concrete is shown the to of (one been lattersamples this finish prepared of have on site colour in some variations This could mitigate which is sample 6). between and(between, precast insitu example, for concrete). • Smooth • Paint • Textured Concrete Society reportConcrete commissionedNetwork an independent have Rail report from the samples the During prepared Society Concrete review on site. to samples visit the observed the 4 and of 7 were representative the by The report SocietyConcrete as anotably being quality. of high also address inconsistencies colour incorporatedrecommendations to damaged repairs the in corners undertaken (deliberately) (see to subsequent details of for samples text undertaken). following

Subchapter Numbers D Concrete finishes Concrete is proposed be concrete cast (i.e. in-situ both to in above, As noted and pre-cast pouredmanufactured factorya and in cast onsite) (i.e. These two methods can elements). as individual site the and sent to alongside visual inconsistencies one another, whendisplay viewed and hence considerable has been work undertaken consider to how and finishes can formwork managedifferences mix, concrete the between an two in aesthetically manner. the appropriate been integrate producedto have - xiv) 2.9.xii samples Site (fig. construction, buildability and ensure judgements aesthetic the to concrete multiple this, achieve To required quality is achieved. and been formwork different pouredsample have utilising mixes, Thistechniques. process has engaged and client stakeholders finishes. and a input the range preferencesWhilst provide to to been there are three principle explored, differentof have options approaches available: Subchapter Numbers geometries and principles Setting out 11 The widened external be the inclined by facade of viaducts will degrees vertical) (from shape the and piers the and arches follow will brick viaductand piers pattern existing the of and spandrels behind. 100mm approximately be situated arch spans will new the However, brick existing the visibility in of resulting existing, higher the than offset structuresimilar A behind. is proposed vertical where the arch the supportof concrete piers brickwork. addresses existing the The corners outer tapering on plan, each the of pier are ‘pleated’ 2.9.xviii). mass pier the as of it approaches figure ground (see the details pleated andSimilar inclined planes other are common to bridge- piers figure and viaduct-supporting and (see abutments corners locations all the In are proposed concrete the of to 2.9.xv). of the risk minimise to be finished a 45-degree with angled chamfer, edges. cracked inconsistent,

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

reas edged in blue receive to anti-grafitti a c

oating, edged in green be to left unfinished fig. 2.9.xxvfig.

Subchapter Numbers as he t w

X M

hanges he c t

o t

pplied ignificantly a s

self raffiti it g

X | 20 M he

Page he t

emoved. r lthough

Design Guide Design r

comprehensively fully appearance considered which is not concrete the acceptable of in importantthis the graffiti from the Most of was location. removed emoved, althoughsome surface GStreated water, scrubbing soapy with by remained. shadowing surface Concretal concrete the W has of also Keim been with Painting graffiti of application the overpainting by and undertaken, followed furtherwith failed paint to coat of additional Concretal. The initial graffiti the disguise adequate and a subsequent coat produced a areas the with which inconsistency a slight and gave ‘shadowing’ paint. coats of additional the has had not enable a consideration effect the of surface of capability on the To three the on weretests taken a series graffiti of of removed to be specifications (massand self-compacting finishes / concrete, producedtextured) sampling process. concrete during the The less porous surface concrete self-compacting the of smoother, performed better slightly mass than graffiti terms of in concrete and solvent techniques (jet-wash, All three removal removal. tried retarded were on the surfaceabrasive) some and paint whilst a substantial amount remained the removed place in within was and recessesvoids finish. the of a suitable with identified treatment a not these Whilst trialshave aesthetic appearance applied the graffitito be simply which allows surfacea that felt is it the gives impregnation removed, andfully best aesthetic appearance of combination and capability graffiti for beremoved. to Following consultation with the treatment manufacturers, treatment the consultation with graffiti Following a solvent use the of jetting, has water beenby removal attempted The basedwater. graffiti and soapy scrubbing hot with remover most substrates successful treated on all graffiti method of removal, cases all In based solvent remover. the was concrete, and untreated a partial whilst that it should benoted graffiti the cleaning of can surfaces concrete on untreated degree limited be of achieved this is considered be inadequate. removal to The surface a certain leave impregnation treatments amount of residualtreated areasof the graffiti concrete. on visible shadowing There are marginal differences between surfaces post-cleaning the products. HB and the PP of The products coating enabled both graffiti the to be more

Subchapter Numbers a

nd s a a

equire r

hat t ractical

oatings, p

n e o

nishes) o fi t

ased b fig.2.9.xxvii);

xxxii);

e b

(HB; fig.2.9.xxx). and

and; ax-based

onsidered w

c hould

s (GS; s

re a

S) Stop

such ( egime G

fig.2.9.xxviii Bridgeguard r

fig.2.9.xxix),

nd a (PP;

Graffiti

(MX; X

reatments reatment t t

air Paints Glaze

p Hydrophobic

Paraguard

D s re-application after removal of graffiti were not appropriate forre-application graffiti of wereappropriate afternot removal project this locationsuse presented the in by realistic initial application and removal techniques which do techniqueswhich and application removal initial realistic onerous unduly require access not requirements or difficult to products source

The clearlysurface visible appliedis canwhich detract from the layer aesthetic quality concrete. econd the of overall • Epicuro • Parex • Keim • Richard’s productsAll four are ‘permanent’ which should withstand treatments, The first graffiti of two cycles removal. andapplication (>10) several are considered be surface(HB and PP) to do impregnations as they the significanta appearance change in lead the to concrete. not of • The raffiti • Anti-graffiti As structural concrete elements Ordsall be the exposed of Chord will it is considered some areas be that graffiti risk at of will groundat level, be with elements coated concrete will the being Some applied. of numberA ofsamples 2.9.xxv. an anti-graffitifig. on as shown finish, differentof anti-graffiti surfacewere undertakentreatments to assist be used.one aspectThis was to material the number a with of of the (amongst others) works undertakenexplore to ‘post-finishing’ visual appearance repair and methods of different of mixes concrete damaged to surfaces. A summary these processes of is illustrated 2.9.xxvi.in fig. surface for The options make to which are treatments intended graffiti of simpler removal and the more successful, the anduse without up producing graffitian to be covered allow to painting of trials. A during the has been investigated patch’ ‘painted obvious moredetailed appraisalincluded study is the as an of appendixto is a summary text main findings. the of following the document; this stages been graffiti of undertaken.trialstreatment have The Two identify widera to range treatments a of stage reviewed initial shortlist second the for four The stage. of main conclusions from firstthis were: stage Management of graffiti of Management Subchapter Numbers second the anti-graffitiFor stage trials, the of treatments applied were:

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 21 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers rotective coatings and cleaning of grafitti; products sampled p

Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xxvifig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C

January 2016 eim Glaze MX rea on right subject cleaning to process as noted) upper part of sample not treated with product and lower K ( a p

art has coating applied; area on left not cleaned and fig. 2.9.xxixfig.

Subchapter Numbers | 22 Page arex Paraguard rea on right subject cleaning to process as noted) upper part of sample not treated with product and lower P ( a p

art has coating applied; area on left not cleaned and Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xxviiifig.

Subchapter Numbers picuro Hydrophobic Bridgeguard Hydrophobic picuro rea on right subject cleaning to process as noted) upper part of sample not treated with product and lower E ( a p

D art has coating applied; area on left not cleaned and

Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xxvii fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 arex Paraguard on a textured finish concrete full surface subject cleaning to process as noted) P (

fig. 2.9.xxxiifig.

Subchapter Numbers | 23 Page ame product cover to graffiti) eim paint lower part of wall subject multiple to coats K ( of s

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xxxifig.

Subchapter Numbers ichards Graffiti Stop rea on right subject cleaning to process as noted) upper part of sample not treated with product and lower R ( a p

art has coating applied; area on left not cleaned and

Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xxxfig. Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C

January 2016 amples of damaged (left hand sidephotograph) of and epaired and colour matched concrete surface to r ex s r

kewback epaired (right hand side) concrete finishes fig. 2.9.xxxvifig. fig. 2.9.xxxivfig.

Subchapter Numbers | 24 Page ample of non-colour matched repair amaged concrete surface skewback to d ex

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xxxvfig. fig. 2.9.xxxiiifig.

Subchapter Numbers D Repair strategy Repair purposes the sampling process,For the of a number areas of damageddeliberately were and Therepaired. repair entails the enablecutting area effective the the around damage of back the to When using smooth- of concrete. patch aninfill of introduction repairfinishes,careappropriate a with reproducecan accurately the geometry or surface surrounding areas of consistency figure (see to a material goodcan difficult Thisbe colour mix infill to 2.9.xxxiii). consist against surrounding different material as the of it will match proportions cement, and of constituent elements. aggregate other finished the repair differences these potential minimise colour, in To 2.9.xxxiv). (see figure a colour finish matched with can be tinted processA similar can be undertaken considered if necessary on surfaces.other this subject The was to surface a skewback of 2.9. xxxvprocess, on figure 2.9.xxxvi). as shown and displays This specifichow surfaces texture to a colour similar andcan be brought areas. adjacent to Rust-staining risks Rust-staining canAnother that affect factor appearance long-term the the of run-off is water concrete steel elements, from the particular in number A of steel. from weathering rust-coloured the rainwater measures areproposed addressand client stakeholder concerns to specific regard,and separate, a documentthis in has been prepared subjecton this (it is included as design Appendix this guide). A to Subchapter Numbers Interfaces and edges trial sampling process the has enabled above, As noted the assist delivery strategies which will the review construction to team discharge conditions. the through of design the which is approved of ensurethe that will detailswhich of Thishas enabled evolution the producednatural variation between not elements concrete will finished the visualbe detrimental appearance. to this to Critical cornerare the to and themselves also in relation in both details, neighbouring structures.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 urface variation in concrete urface in variation ariation in colour between adjacent pre-cast panels s v

fig. 2.9.xlii fig. fig. 2.9.xlifig. One Peters St. Square (pre-cast concrete) an comparator for appropriate is not building this someIn ways Northernthe structures Hub asit is factory-formed as cladding which surfacethe thanconcrete insitu rather the building of finish is particularly it useful in is performing a structural However, role. be expected between is to which colour pre- the variation illustrating are cast same they from if the cast sources material panels even of Various aspectsthe surfaceof figure xli). finish are(see when useful consideringbe addressedissues proposed the the will that use by Northern the for concrete self-compacting of The at cladding Hub. SquareOne has St. Peters areas cracking figure xlii) hairline (see of occur when concrete to self-compacting be lesswhich would likely is be used.

Subchapter Numbers | 25 Page nconsistencies visual appearance in n-situ concrete i i

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xl fig. fig. 2.9.xxxixfig. Deansgate Castlefield Metrolink (insitu concrete) Deansgate(insitu Metrolink Castlefield Thisrecently cast figure structure (see xxxix) does appear not been be left designed to have which is intended as concrete to unfinished and hence it is to as assumedpainted perbe it is that its in However, example). structures previous (see Metrolink other of of some reference a useful it currentlyprovides unfinished state problems figure xl)surfacethe which (see arise from: repairs of an colour;inconsistent partial finished the surface of grinding (exposing and surfaceaggregates some in areas others); and contaminants not often staining, rust-coloured in from (resulting formwork on the degrading formwork).

Subchapter Numbers ainted concrete finish raffitiover-painted g p

D Review of comparable structures comparable of Review concrete) (insitu stops Recent TFGM structures the is for TFGM A common approach by utilised a mineral with paint. be painted to stops associated Metrolink with This can be seen recently locations various at on the constructed (see Road Manchester Airport,to line St. Werburgh’s including figure varying xxxvii).the a slightly exhibit these(to of degree) Each true expression the effect which removes paint the of ‘deadening’ The for strategy colour and concrete texture. the in variations of the samewith colour; repainting graffitimanaging involves principally a theoretically is sound approach this it is dependent whilst however correcton the colour beingsuccessful applied is not (if this patch the can as(see graffiti the be as wasfigure obvious over-painting of xxxvi)ii). is strategy (based this that should be on painting) It noted particularof merit where areas track’ access beaten in the ‘off is natural surveillance. little) butpossible there is no (or vandalism for fig. 2.9.xxxviiifig. Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xxxviifig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 26 Page agged-up concrete finish b

Design Guide Design Victoria Station (insitu concrete) buttress is the concrete in-situ Another of recent details example which support ribs figure xlv). ends Victoria main at roof the (see of of self-compacting) not These cast were as mass (i.e. concrete compounded qualityan inconsistent which was mix poor of with between formwork cast of buttresses.protection individual Problems the arising finish addressed(i.e. from these were a ‘bagged-up’ with evens voids and render / cracks a concrete which fills of application technique can address This post-finishing out colour variation). problemsmany but cannotconceal some major defects. fig. 2.9.xlvfig.

Subchapter Numbers -situ concrete -situ urface cracking repairs and in s

D fig. 2.9.xliii fig. Piccadilly GardensPiccadilly concrete) (insitu hasthat an finish This exposed of project concrete is a useful example It does xliii). figure decade a (see weathering been of over subject to honey-combing with appear be concrete, not self-compacting to the staining and degradation towards visible and extensive evident The latter effect walls. the lack the of by top is probably exacerbated It has beento wall. subject the of top flashing a the or at of coping the in exposed variations cleaningvarious techniques have which xliv). figure (see andmix qualityconcrete formwork of Subchapter Numbers 2.9.xliv fig.

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 27 Page nal sample with proposed finishes and details fi

Design Guide Design fig. 2.9.xlvifig.

Subchapter Numbers f t a in o

( an an

no ore c c is

ome

bility

m is s nd

nestly it itigate

e it

aint m b ho

he mount

here

p t uccessful t

o ometimes

a t

s f ppearance

s an

ich a o

i.e. c olour (

ainting

c re wh ore

a ws

isks reater

assuming m r ( o

g uration

fla e d

erformance, t b successful s

emoval

exture

r a roduces t

sed

is rior oncentration ue

p u an a urfaces p

c d c

consistency

atisfactory

erceived e

ixes s raffiti raffiti

p b g

g a

tinting

ppropriate o ny reates o t if a t epairs a c

eakest colour

roduct

deal n i

w p djacent

f ggregates

he ixes oncrete a o t he ther dequate

t c predictability m a

o chieve

emove

orrect un matched

lemishes

ours c f ffers o ven nd b degree an asic t

o p o e

c b

ith rovide f exture isk p o p’ his ith t w

t oncrete colour

o w f c s

t urface ppropriate

ifficult se

s highest a urface

be u d

ha f

aper

o onsistent f f

re p c he the asic

o bility o

a emoval can

b n a pplied

a o

‘ c

D risk of horizontal ‘tide-marks’ horizontal risk of expected of concrete in terms of slight variation in colour in variation slight terms of in concrete expectedof techniques other than reflects the nature of concrete reflects nature the particularly) texture enhanced surface of variation is acceptable) or etching in variations to due more apparent anticipated than conditions. environmental to achieve a truly smooth finish a truly smooth achieve to which is exposedaggregate pitted the in remain surface) ‘ingrained’ without risks in terms of consistency of reapplication of consistency terms of in risks without masked easily achieve texture consistency texture achieve aesthetic concrete loss a ‘true’ of • Choice • Graffiti • Repairs • Requires • Reduction • Repairs • Allows • Consistency • Variation • Final • Limited olour • Enables • Provides • With • When bagging • Whilst Summary identificationproposal and of options of issues three each the with of summarise key notes the The following primary surface finishes. Painted It is for the reasons the is for as-struck,It described that self- smooth above a surface with compacting concrete impregnation anti-graffitifinish is proposed Network Northern the for Rail by finishes. Hub is This based as inherent being concrete colour in minor on variations the wider existing the design of aesthetic and context the to appropriate masonry structures. As-struck Subchapter Numbers Textured

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 B espoke OLE gantries as proposed in application TWA 2.10.i fig. fig.

Subchapter Numbers | 28 Page Design Guide Design For the first two options technical first the and For options constructabilitytwo constraints quickly mean standard only that gantries and can be provided, gantries bespoke the it is suggested for it is appropriate therefore that furtherno extend to current directions the those than proposal,in to incongruous changesavoid between different structuralforms. possibility the gantries bespoke to for reviewed option Thethird as / amended farcontinue as possible existing standard before gantries are This encountered. change occurs Youth the close to construction constraints (in terms of However, building. Hostel and OLE supports mean the that phasing) between COL 117 cantilever); track format (TTC must a cantilever be of - Twin 119A legsrather with than viaduct. These on either the side of cantilever standard the different both andstructures to arequite visually OLE portals.bespoke offer therefore They an ideal opportunity act astransition a betweento standard as line and bespoke the progresses north. from south to utilise change designthe to logicto there is a strong As this a result of and 121. 3 gantries the structures betweenbespoke to COL 119A either structures these and side bespoke of to cantilever the With standard use of the appear 3, gantries incongruous would visually beenand hence proposals the amended propose use have the of to view). overall resultantthe for 2.10.ii gantries bespoke fig. here (see Ordsall visual appreciation the the Much of of Chord structures will standard use the of start and the at stopping be from street level, viaduct structures widening concrete the is anof effective junction new around the onwards, point this between From and old. new use the Way, bridges and thenacross Irwell railway the and Trinity designs bespoke is a logicalof visual series new ties which the structural a unique structures these form to for important elements infrastructure. railway of

Subchapter Numbers Viaduct

Viaduct

Castlefield

Viaduct

Castlefield

existing

the

Middlewood existing

the the along

onto

along

north, west south-east

the the the

D • • to • to to Subchapter Numbers Specific2.10. project wide design elements - Gantries (OLE) Equipment Line Overhead 2.10.1 The design OLE TWA proposals incorporated a number ‘bespoke’ of and signal gantries designed the context to respond specificallyto wereThese designed iv). and 2.10.iii Ordsall the fig. of Chord (see particular for sectionsproposed the of railinfrastructure, and have the within been integrate smoothly designed will such they that adjacent areas standard which utilise gantry as designs those (such 2.10.v). fig. in illustrated discussions stakholders, with Following a variety differentof options incorporating for further reviewed OLE gantrieswere bespoke into proposed those application. TWA proposals the the to in addition in These concentrated on producing logical structures groups of that centre the At a considered in sit together manner. andwould holistic gantries bespoke proposal 11 for TWAO the was eachof option areas track and new Castlefield on between the Middlewood the 2.10.i). Viaducts fig. (see OLE frame gantries and additional (similarly (an an accompanying Two been signals gantry) proposals the incorporated bespoke) have into north the ensure to to continuing river, the Salford bank of on the predominant weathering scheme the visual element the that (the of Irwell the Bridge of and Trinity elevation west the of steel ‘ribbon’ This structures introducesbespoke as as many can crossing). Way and technically scheme existing the be the incorporated before into Viaduct begin. frames Middlewood complex the of On Manchester three the logical bank the extending directions for gantries bespoke are: the

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 29 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers O verhead Line Equipment gantries; view 3D identifying locations and diagrams illustrate to visual appearance D

Subchapter Numbers

2.10.ii [for further area[for this details of refer drawings 100380 to - 100385 inclusive] fig. fig. 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 30 Page 3-TRACK BESPOKE PORTAL Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers bespoke gantries bespoke D

Subchapter Numbers BESPOKE PORTAL

2.10.iii fig. fig. 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 BESPOKE SIGNAL GANTRY

Subchapter Numbers | 31 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers bespoke gantries bespoke D

Subchapter Numbers

2.10.iv 4-TRACK BESPOKE PORTAL fig. fig. 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 STANDARDSIGNAL GANTRY

Subchapter Numbers | 32 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers standard gantries standard D

Subchapter Numbers

2.10.v fig. fig. 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 4 3 2

Subchapter Numbers 1 | 33 Page proposed cover plate

Design Guide Design fig 2.10.vi 2.10.vi fig

Subchapter Numbers Due to the visually complex interface complex visually the between Due to inclined the OLEleg vertical and here the design brick the intention face, the last the part towards back allow ‘kick’ leg the is to to of geometrical mimics the viaduct. This ‘kick’ language used when viaduct is being the widened side, opposite on the off steel andviaduct the the below reflecting cantilevered bracket. the of reducing size the has a direction plate proposedThe the language of cover OLE legthe ‘kick’. andlanguage of visual connectionthe to conceal edge bracket, to of back top folds plate The cover two sides the necessary are the leftwhile for provide open to visual inspections.uninterrupted a more slender proposal provide shape. this will On elevation, the beenThe sides pushed OLE leg of have towards in back below angles fixing bracket of to refer centre to the shapeof cover overall then influencesthe This strategy (3) is tapered plate to The cover when seenplate on elevation. reflectthe tapered the legOLE above. of D 4 3 2 1

Subchapter Numbers Specific2.10. project wide design elements - Bespoke2.10.2 OLE Bracket Plate Cover typical of and anchor OLE bracket The design historic evolution arrangements efficient a number highly of has developed and economic As solutions. is described section in xxxx, the for specific the of andhistoric Ordsalldesignthe urban Chord context OLEportal “bespoke” a Ordsallled the to for Chord, development considered supporting was it brackets the most for appropriate standard the be with consistent OLE gantriesOLE bespoke to the portals alongside them. OLE gantriesWhere bespoke on proposed are the mounted does solutions structures standard use not of this (‘off-the-shelf’) visualcause issues any as gantry the support parapet. is behind the structureexisting it gantry whereto an a bespoke is fixed However, designconsidered holistic a that was discussion MCC) (through with plate incorporatecover a This will beappropriate. approach would locations screenthe 4 visually whereat a fixingsto the brackets brickexisting structure the of the side OLE gantryto bespoke is fixed Castlefield the Viaduct. of describe brackets: notes design the the for rationale The following

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 soffit protection edge protection surface protection

Subchapter Numbers | 34 Page l measures deterrant pigeon of ocations Design Guide Design

2.10.vii

Subchapter Numbers fig.

rom f ealm

ifferent d

f uffer o ublic s

ould w ccess)

products

avements, nce p nishes

he fi

he t se

and n (

deterrent o

who

different

edestrians of tructures

equirements s p r

f f o o

impacts

D deterrent products areas and footbridge the presencethe birds of • Protection • Protection • Visual • Maintenance 2.10. Specific2.10. project wide design elements - Pigeon2.10.2 deterrant measures seriesA differentthe been of issues considered develop have to proposed bird deterrence strategy: Subchapter Numbers structural the of forms proposedA review has enabled the of surfaces identification presentwill that (ledges and plinths) bird perching certain In of andrisks nesting. locations the example, proposed flat soffitsthe (for structures have and hence are no deterrent features Gateway) Middlewood required. the areasindicates where deterrant 2.10.vii The plan on fig. measures themselves. are propsed, and plastic spikes the

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

MP for detail) anels (see anels nterpretation i p C

N I fig. 2.10.ix fig. NHE_127523-2405-OCD-WPA-DDR-D-000028 highways engineer Please refer drawing: to TYPE 2 type standard 2: white on blue in locations dictated by

Subchapter Numbers TYPE 1 | 35 Page ype 1: inger post public to ype 1: realm areas t Castlefield (MSJ & AR) Viaduct Ramp Cattle Water St Bridge Colonnade Station Arrivals Viaduct Zigzag Girder Bridge Bridge Stephensons

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ay-finding posts ommemorative plaques: w c

Design Guide Design W 1 TYPE 1 fig. 2.10.x fig. fig. 2.10.viii 2.10.viii fig.

Subchapter Numbers 2.10. (

rovide 2.10.x) p

o t

(fig.

tructures s

signage

nformation i

istoric h

f o

xpansive e

‘finger-post’

ore scriptions m

ith w

hort directional

oards b

cyclist rovide

/ p

o t

S S

context (fig. 2.10.ix) (fig. context viii) • Pedestrian • Plaques • Interpretation 2.10.3 2.10.3 to be required be will signage pedestrian Someexisting way-finding standards appropriate the with align relocatedor replaced. This will Interpretation and ignage already this definedarea.in these of locations The signs indicated are stage. this for plan drawings relevant on the a feature site around the streets and footpaths The existing certain replacedbe (with will which signage, wayfinding amount of adjustments whereappropriate necessary). these to addition In information of basicalso requirements provision be the there will structures. historic the This produces to a schedulerelating of signage which can be summarised under three headings: 2.10. 2.10. pecific project wide design elements - Subchapter Numbers signage, designincluded are[Not this guide elements in highways of document.] separate a by which are covered signage positions across of an overview the provides 2.10.xi Figure each category with site, identified. requirementsthe to beenmatch signs have The proposed finger-post The locations and river. the local of the banks authoritiesof on both 2.10.xxvi. be incorporated on figure directions to are shown compliment the information The plaques and interpretive Conservation works Management mitigation and other the Plan proposedof specific is each plaque wording (the details and the to incorporated be onto information The CMP). the identifiedin plaques has been from research drawn undertaken as part the of HeritageAssessment, Museum the and consultation ongoing with has helped Scienceof develop Industry and Trust Canal and River elements. interpretative the for materials the to be is information interpretation signage, way-finding to addition In Viaduct and Street between 1830 the area Water the in of provided below. section in are provided 3.1.18 this DetailsMOSI. of

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 er Park City Park er w Path ueum of Science & Industry ueum of Science & Industry ueum of Science & Industry iddlewood Viaduct iddlewood rdsall Hallrdsall iver Park Central Park iver iver Park Quays pinningfield Peoples History Museum History Peoples pinningfield eoples History Museum eoples relocation of existing sign; refer to highways proposals] Manchester Manchester History Museum Peoples Central Salford Manchester Spinningfield [relocation of existing sign; refer to highways proposals] [relocation of existing sign; refer to highways proposals] To M S M M Riv P M O R R Cornbrook [

5: 6: Specific2.10. project wide design elements - (Condition Trees 4) 2.10.4 are proposed as part proposals,Trees the of part in as replacement construction the be for the felled which are those required of for to bridges,particularof but primarily definition railway the for spaces and steel structures concrete the and around. as a compliment to beenSpecies urban their chosen and as have to appropriate and specified these setting; are illustrated following waterside the on (fig. page xxvii). Directional Signage: Directional 1: 2: 3: 4:

Subchapter Numbers | 36 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers l ocations ofsignage, plaques and interpretation boards

2.10.xi D fig. fig.

Subchapter Numbers

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 PROPOSED TREE SPECIES: SPECIES: TREE PROPOSED 5NO. COMMON ALDER. PROPOSED TREE SPECIES: SPECIES: TREE PROPOSED PIN OAK.1NO. PROPOSED TREE SPECIES: SPECIES: TREE PROPOSED 3NO. WEST HIMALAYAN BIRCH. PROPOSED TREE SPECIES, SPECIES, TREE PROPOSED PLANTER: RAISED WITHIN AMERICAN1NO. SWEETGUM.

Subchapter Numbers | 37 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers 1) American Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) (Liquidambar Sweetgum American 1) Magnificent, medium-sized tree with a straight leading stem, conical whenyoung, later more rounded and in maturity with an open crown with several strong, spreading main branches. growing Slow when juvenile. whenSize planted: Specimen tree, 35-40cm girth, height, clear 2m 5 x transplanted, stem 6-7m in spread. Annual 30) m in height to growth (up and 12m 20 6 to is to 35 cm in height, cm spread, 20 growth:Potential 10 on deep soils often much more. Characteristics: should Regenerates not be planted Tree on nutrient-rich too well. and sites. wet Prefers warm positions,only limited tolerance urban of sites, requires large area open of soil for root development. Should onlybe planted in spring because possible of frost damage (failure in young plants). glutinosa) (Alnus Alder Common 2) Large tree with pyramidal, open crown and picturesquely hanging branches when old, generally with a straight single leading stem, but also often multi-stemmed. whenSize planted: Specimen tree, 30-35cm girth, height, clear 2m 4 x transplanted, stem 5-7m m in spread. Annual growth is 40 30 cm in height, to (14) m in height 25) and 12 to 8 to (up 20 to growth:Potential 10 cm spread.20 Characteristics:first A class pioneer tree, colonises sterile sands along with Salix caprea,tolerance high of flooding andwinds, good soil amelioration, does not require much warmth, nitrogen fixing. The leaves rot rapidly making good years). humus. 150 to Long lived (up jacquemontii) utilis (Betula Birch Himalayan West 3) Deciduous medium-sized ornamental tree or decorative shrub that makes an excellent multi-stemmed specimen. Theascending branches form a static, formal, upright habit with a denser crown. The papery thin, bark is very shiny, reddish brown, reddish then white, shimmering and white peeling. whenSize planted: Specimen tree, 4 x transplanted, 4-5m height, multi-stemmed m in spread. in height and 10 6 to 18m to growth:Potential 10 Characteristics: Robust shallow rooting tree that prefers moist, well-drained soil. will thrive It in full sun or light, dappled shade. 4) Pin Oak (Quercus palustris) Medium-sized large to tree with a conical crown and mostly a straight leading stem, branches are horizontal and wide spreading, in maturity branches crown in the hang lower The increasingly. sections development nest-like of dry of branches is typical. Slow glowing. whenSize planted: Specimen tree, 40-45cm girth, height, 6 x transplanted, clear 2m stem 7-9m in spread. in height, 20) 25)m to Annual to sometimes (up (up 20 growth to higher is and 15 8 to growth:15 Potential ca. 25cm. Characteristics: tolerant, Frost suitable for urban sites, especially tolerant sulphur of has (DIRR), oxide a tendency to sectionsdevelop dry of branches (also has this tendency in its environment). native pitTree sizes - Specimen tree (35-40 tree x 1500mm & 40-45cm pit x 1700mm girth) with 1700mm - Specimen tree (Multi-stemmed & 30-35cm girth) x 1300mm x 1500mm with 1500mm All tree planting include to underground guying support, irrigation & aeration pipe around root ball system appropriate treeto girth, root barrier mulch, drainage protection layer, i llustrations, specifications and locations of trees D

Subchapter Numbers

2.10.xii fig. fig. 2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 38 Page E S P T Nu N Design Guide Design

- - - - xternal programme; Communications - Management Plan; Waste ite - and incidentplan; control prevention ollution Land 9 – Contaminated Condition Planning raffic ManagementPlan; - Ecology 10 Condition Planning isance Management Plan; Contract Works for 12– Condition Planning oise and Vibration management plan. need be that adhered Conditions to to 1 – Timescale Condition Planning 6– Condition Planning Implementation and of maintenance landscaping beenThe programmed construction have Stages, works in or areas NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA- and drawing see work 2.11.xxviii of designDDR-A-000001 Stages Overview Plan. Division and of guide stages. individual The be submissions planning into will drawing these Stages with the align and therefore will packages madein that construction programme sequence. Conditions to be discharged design and guide to drawings Conditions by Stages 2 – Condition Development of Planning accordance 3 – In drawings Condition planning the with Planning 4 – Landscaping Condition Planning & Lighting and Surfacing 5 – Paving Condition Planning Colour Materials, Scheme the – Details of & 11 Condition Planning Finishes Crime Reduction 13– Condition Planning – Heritage Assets 14 Condition Planning Bridge – Stephenson’s 15 Condition Planning and implementation under – Approval these 16 Condition Planning conditions be discharged Conservation to Conditions by management plan and schedule works of and Consent plans 2 – Schedule works Condition Listed Building of Consent 3 – Conservation Condition Listed Building Management Plan (CMP) Consent accordance 5 – In Condition Listed Building the with plans approved be discharged seperate documents to Conditions by 7 - Archaeology Condition Planning 8 – Code Construction Condition of Practice (CoCP) Planning CoCP the addendum to This following includes, the

Subchapter Numbers D

Subchapter Numbers 2.11 Stages Plan - Condition 2 This section Design the each of Guide at proposals looks area the of sequence running in north. turn, in from south to Each sub-section and discharge TWA condition relevant the of begins a list with across context the provide that notes by This is followed drawings. particular a design and area. illustrations narrative There then follows specificfor the elementsproposals.of The conditions. planning ten included application 16 The TWAO applications each consent included 5 conditions. (LBC) building listed the by wasSecretaryfinalised of planning conditions Thelist final attached conditions number the A Ordsall of the Chord State. to of Ordertaking must be place. discharged works any prior to stakeholders and key other Early engagement LPAs the with designthe of and constructioninfluenced methodology development as necessary meet requirements/aspirations their to or appropriate. (HE) engagement England with Historic This with which will is inline Listed and Conditions the be required heritage the for TWAO related conditions Consent (LBC) Building

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Stage A Castlefield Viaduct Streetand Water

Subchapter Numbers Stage B and Zig-zag 1830 Viaducts Stage C Bridge Stephenson’s | 39 Stage E Network arch and bridges Way Trinity Stage D River Irwell banks Bridge Prince’s and Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers Stage F Viaduct Middlewood ivision of design guide and drawing into individual stages D

D fig. 2.11.i fig.

Subchapter Numbers Stage G Salford Central to Victoria Station

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 iaduct Proposed support track structure across 1830 IrwellProposed River / Network Arch Bridge. Proposed Ordsall Chord North-West Bank Abutment Bridge and associated Way Proposed Trinity Bridge to Way Proposed Abutment connecting Trinity Proposed Water Street Bridge and abutmentsProposed located Water V

OCD4 OCD5 OCD6 OCD7 OCD2 OCD3 Proposed Structures Categorisation Proposed Street Bridge Proposed Water OCD1 within Nikal Car Park. Manchester. Car Park. Nikal within Structure. Salford Bank. Structure. Connects proposed the River Irwell / Network Arch proposed the Bridge Trinity to bridge. Salford Way Salford abutments. carriageway / DSE Viaduct. Salford Middlewood

Subchapter Numbers

| 40 Page rizontal line at the upper the at edge line parapetrizontal / ho A column, either structural or decorative, in a wall at The sloping face of the abutment the The on which an face of sloping A framework suspendedA framework train tracks, across several Underside a bridge of / element. Overhead Line Equipment Permanent Way OLE structure - a form of with Cantilever Track Twin Act Order and Works Transport Unitary Plan Development The area between curve outer an the arch of and the

Design Guide Design

OLE PWAY Soffit TTC UDP TWAO Spandrel Pier bearing strengthen regular A load it, intervals to wall between openings. Skewback extremity an arch of rests. Signal Gantry be mounted. signals and may upon many which one post and carrying catenary two sets of from one boom. cantilevered

Subchapter Numbers

Structure which supports ends a bridge. the of Stone material which forms the trackbed of a railway material which forms trackbed the Stone a railway of Small bridge or pipe carrying stream a under a railway National Planning Policy Framework Policy Planning National The area alongside and below the level of a railway a railway of The area level alongside the and below two points. which joins A line Projects Investment Railway Guide to A curved structure usually a vertical in by that plane, COL refers to the Bolton Railway line between Ordsall between line Ordsall Railway Bolton the COL refers to English Cities Fund Cities English England Historic Manchester City Council Museum Science of and Industry Natural England Salford CityCouncil Greater Manchester for Transport Department Transport for Overhead frame from structures which various can be

between line Moss Chat the SE Railway refers to

GRIP NPPf Chord Cess Arch tie bars / Tie bars components tension. holding in for together A device bar is a member A tie carryingA tied force. a tension arch between is one where joints the arch the and the resist to a tie are joined by foundations thrust. horizontal Ballast line. Arch Ordsall Land and junction Deal Street junction. L & MR Liverpool and Manchester Railway South Junction and AltrinchamMSJ Railway & AR Manchester, Terminology Abutments COL HE MCC MoSI NE SCC TfGM Stakeholders DfT ECF 2.12 Ordsall Chord Glossary and Terminology track into which rainwater is drained. which rainwater into track Culvert or road. Gantry mounted. itsshape spans an opening and carries principally load transmitting foundations by a compressive thrust to Landjunction and junction Castlefield DSE Subchapter Numbers Existing Railway Assets

2.0 esign considerations Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 oposed Plan oposed Plan oposed Reflective View oposed Reflective oposed Reflective View oposed Plan oposed Elevation A oposed Elevation A oposed Elevation B oposed Elevation B oposed & Existing Plan oposed & Existing Elevation A oposed & Existing Elevation B oposed & Existing Plan oposed & Existing oposed & Existing Elevation A oposed & Existing Elevation B MSJ&AR Viaduct & Cast Iron Bridge & 1845 Viaduct Site Edge Red Plan Red Edge Site 1845 Viaduct & Bridge Iron Cast & Viaduct MSJ&AR

Subchapter Numbers Description - Overview Key Plan Heritage Drawing Castlefield Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Elevation A Viaduct - Section 01 Heritage Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Elevation B Viaduct - Section 01 Heritage Castlefield (MSJ&AR) & Pr Viaduct - Section 01 Existing Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Heritage Elevation A Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Part 1 Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Part 1 Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Section 03 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Reflective View Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Heritage Elevation A Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Section 04 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Reflective View Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct -

LBC application documents relevant to Stage A: relevant documents LBC application / doc no. Drawing TWA-3-0-001 TWA-3-1-100 TWA-3-1-101 TWA-3-1-102 TWA-3-1-103 TWA-3-1-104 TWA-3-1-105 TWA-3-1-106 TWA-3-1-201 TWA-3-1-202 TWA-3-1-203 TWA-3-1-204 TWA-3-1-205 TWA-3-1-206 TWA-3-1-301 TWA-3-1-302 TWA-3-1-303 TWA-3-1-304 TWA-3-1-305 TWA-3-1-306 TWA-3-1-401 TWA-3-1-402 TWA-3-1-403 TWA-3-1-404 TWA-3-1-405 TWA-3-1-406 | 41 Page oposed Plan oposed Plan Design Guide Design oposed Plan oposed Elevation A oposed Reflective View oposed Reflective oposed Reflective View oposed Elevation B oposed Elevation A oposed Elevation B

Subchapter Numbers oposed & Existing Plan oposed & Existing Elevation A oposed & Existing Elevation B oposed & Existing Plan oposed & Existing Elevation A oposed & Existing oposed & Existing Elevation B MSJ&AR Viaduct & Cast Iron Bridge & 1845 Viaduct Site Edge Red Plan Red Edge Site 1845 Viaduct & Bridge Iron Cast & Viaduct MSJ&AR Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Reflective View Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Part 1 Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Part 1 Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Section 03 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 03 Reflective View Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Heritage Elevation A Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 04 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct Section 04 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Elevation A Viaduct - Section 01 Heritage Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 01 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Elevation B Viaduct - Section 01 Heritage Castlefield (MSJ&AR) & Pr Viaduct - Section 01 Existing Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Section 02 Heritage Elevation A Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Heritage Elevation B Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Section 02 Existing & Pr Castlefield (MSJ&AR) Viaduct - Description Castlefield

S TWA-3-1-403 TWA-3-1-403 TWA-3-1-404 TWA-3-1-405 TWA-3-1-406 TWA-3-1-304 TWA-3-1-304 TWA-3-1-305 TWA-3-1-306 TWA-3-1-401 TWA-3-1-402 TWA-3-1-204 TWA-3-1-204 TWA-3-1-205 TWA-3-1-206 TWA-3-1-301 TWA-3-1-302 TWA-3-1-303 TWA-3-1-104 TWA-3-1-104 TWA-3-1-105 TWA-3-1-106 TWA-3-1-201 TWA-3-1-202 TWA-3-1-203 Drawing / doc. no. Drawing TWA-3-1-100 TWA-3-1-101 TWA-3-1-102 TWA-3-1-103 Subchapter Numbers A: to Stage relevant application documents TWA

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 rack rack: Part 1 rack: Part 2 rack rack COL124 est Elevations oposed Plan oposed Sections oposed Elevations op Signal Gantry op. Plan, Ele. &Section A: Landscape Plan/ Highways – Pt. 1 – Pt. Highways Plan/ A: Landscape 2 – Pt. Highways Plan/ A: Landscape description - East Elevations Stage A: COL121-124 - W Stage A: COL121-124 – Plans Stage A: COL121-124 Existing Plan (Demo.) Stage A: COL125a Existing Eles. (Demo.) Stage A: COL125a Existing Section (Demo.) Stage A: COL125a Stage A: COL125a Pr Stage A: COL125a Pr Stage A: COL125a Pr Stage A: COL129 Pr Stage Stage Stage A: Bespoke OLE 2 T Stage A: Bespoke OLE 3 T Stage A: Bespoke OLE 3 T Stage A: Bespoke OLE 4 T Stage A: Bespoke OLE 3 T Stage A: Bespoke OLE OCD2 Stage A: COL129 Pr Stage A: TTC Section and Elevation

ev. ev. r P02 P02 P02 P03 P03 P03 P04 P02 P03 P03 P04 P04 P03 P03 P03 P03 P01 P03 P02 P02

Subchapter Numbers

drawing / doc. no. NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100316 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100317 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100318 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100320 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100321 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100322 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100323 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100324 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100327 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100330 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100350 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100351 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100380 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100381 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100382 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100383 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100384 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100385 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100386 NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100387 | 42 Page op. Plan A op. Ele A op. Plan B op. Ele B oposed Elevations oposed Sections oposed Plan op. Plan , Elevation & Section op. Plan, Elevation & Section Design Guide Design dinated Urban Realm - Manchester dinated Urban Realm - Salford oposed Parapet Plan: Section 1 oposed Parapet Plan: Section 2 oposed Parapet Plan: Section 3 oposed Parapet Plan: Section 4 oposed Parapet Plan: Section 5 oposed Street Plan: Section 1 Plan: Section oposed Street 2 Plan: Section oposed Street Plan: Section 3 oposed Street Plan: Section 4 oposed Street Plan: Section 5 oposed Street

Subchapter Numbers A: COL119a Elevation / Section (Demolitions) Stage A: COL119a Existing Plan (Demolition) Stage Stage A: COL119a Pr Stage A: COL119a Pr Stage A: COL119a Pr Stage A: COL123 Pr Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings - Pr Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings Stage A: Coor Stage A: Coor Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: LBD Boundaries Fabric Repair Scope. Stages A, B & C Stage A: Repairs to Existing Fabric – Ele Section 1 Stage A: Repairs to Existing Fabric – Ele Section 2 Stage A: Repairs to Existing Fabric – Ele Section 3 Stage A: Repairs to Existing Fabric – Ele Section 4 Stage A: COL112 REB Plans Stage A: COL112 REB Elevations Stage A: COL117 REB Plans Stage A: COL117 REB Elevations Stage A: COL117 Pr description Plan Stages Overview Part 1 Stage A: Key Plan: Part 2 Stage A: Key Plan: Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr Stage A: Pr – Existing Plan Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings - Existing Eles Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings - Pr Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings - Pr Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings - Pr Stage A: New Elm Road Buildings

ev. P03 P03 P03 P03 P03 P03 P02 P04 P04 P03 P03 P03 P03 P03 P01 P02 P03 P03 P03 P03 P02 P02 P02 P02 P03 r P03 P02 P03 P03 P03 P03 P04 P03 P03 P02 P03 P03 P03

S NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100308 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100309 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100315 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100213 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100301 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100305 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100306 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100307 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100203 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100204 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100210 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100211 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100212 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100155 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100160 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100165 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100201 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100202 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100131 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100151 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100152 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100153 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100154 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100122 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100125 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100126 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100130 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100104 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100105 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100110 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100111 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100121 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100002 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100002 Strategy P01 Accessibility NHE_127523-5804-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-000201 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100101 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100102 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100103 drawing / doc. no. NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-000001 NHE_127523-BDP-OCD-WPA-DDR-A-100001 Subchapter Numbers drawings with planning in accordance Condition 3 - Planning of conditions: for the discharge Stage A) prepared to (relevant supporting information Additional

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 43 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers COL 106 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Remedial Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 106 Castlefield Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 106 Castlefield Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 107 Castlefield Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 107 Castlefield Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 108 Castlefield 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 108 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 109 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 109 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 110 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 110 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 111 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 111 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 112 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 112 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 112A Castlefield Viaduct 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 112A Castlefield Viaduct 1 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 113 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 113 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 3 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 113 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 113A Castlefield Viaduct 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 113A Castlefield Viaduct 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 114 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 114 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 115 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 115 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Works Sheet 1 of 3 Remedial COL 116 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 3 Remedial COL 116 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 3 of 3 Remedial COL 116 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 117 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 117 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 118 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 118 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 119 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 119 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 119A Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 119A Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 120 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 120 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 120A Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 120A Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 121 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 121 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 122 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial COL 122 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial COL 123 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Description

P01 P01 P01 P01 P02 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P02 P01 P02 P01 P01 P02 P01 P01 P02 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P02 P01 P02 P01 P02 P01 P01 P01 P02 P01 P02 S NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005001 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005002 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005010 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005011 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005020 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005021 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005030 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005031 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005040 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005041 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005050 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005051 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005060 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005061 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005070 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005071 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005080 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005081 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005082 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005090 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005091 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005100 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005101 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005110 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005111 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005120 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005121 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005122 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005130 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005131 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005140 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005141 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005150 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005151 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005160 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005161 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005170 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005171 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005180 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005181 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005190 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005191 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005200 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005201 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005210 Subchapter Numbers drawings with planning in accordance Condition 3 - Planning the discharge of conditions: for A) prepared to Stage information (relevant Additional supporting rev. Drawing / doc. no.

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 44 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers COL 123 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Stage A Masonry Arch Remedial Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 123 Castlefield Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 124 Castlefield Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 124 Castlefield Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 125 Castlefield Works Sheet 2 of 2 Remedial Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage A COL 125 Castlefield Works Sheet 1 of 2 Remedial A Masonry Arch Viaduct Planning Stage COL 125A Castlefield 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 125A Castlefield Viaduct 1 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 126 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 126 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 3 of 3 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 126 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 127 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 127 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 128 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 128 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 1 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 129 Castlefield Viaduct Planning 2 of 2 Works Sheet Remedial Stage A Masonry Arch COL 129 Castlefield Viaduct Planning Sheet 1 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(1) Castlefield Viaduct Sheet 2 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(1) Castlefield Viaduct Sheet 3 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(1) Castlefield Viaduct Sheet 1 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(2) Castlefield Viaduct Sheet 2 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(2) Castlefield Viaduct Sheet 3 of 3 Works Remedial Planning Stage A Masonry Arch COL 130(2) Castlefield Viaduct Description

P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P02 P02 P01 P02 P01 P01 P02 P01 P01 P01 P02 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 S Drawing / doc. no. rev. Drawing / doc. no. NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005211 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005220 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005221 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005230 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005231 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005240 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005241 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005250 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005251 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005252 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005260 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005261 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005270 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005271 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005280 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005281 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005290 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005291 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005292 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005300 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005301 NHE-127523-2405-COL-WPA-DDR-C-005302 Subchapter Numbers drawings with planning in accordance Condition 3 - Planning the discharge of conditions: for A) prepared to Stage information (relevant Additional supporting

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 45 Page Design Guide Design

Subchapter Numbers Masonry Repairs - Specification for the Works - Specification for the Masonry Repairs Works - Specification for the Masonry Repairs Works - Specification for the Cleaning Masonry Repairs Brickwork Bonds - Standard Masonry Repairs than 4 Rings Greater in Arches - Recasing of Defective Brickwork Masonry Repairs up to 4 Rings in Arches - Recasing of Defective Brickwork Masonry Repairs up to 4 Rings of Defective Brickwork in Arches Masonry Repairs - Single Ring Re-casing System and Grouting Pinning Ring Cross Masonry Repairs - Brick Arch & Barrel Between Voissoir Cracks in Arches Masonry Repairs - Stitching of Longitudinal Cracks Barrel (Rotational) Arch Masonry Repairs - Stitching Transverse Cracks Barrel (Shear) Arch Masonry Repairs - Stitching Longitudinal Cracks in Brickwork Masonry Repairs - Stitching of Longitudinal of Bricks Masonry Repairs - Spot Replacement Arrangements Works Masonry Repairs - Temporary Refurbishment Masonry Repairs - Stone Masonry Walls Masonry Repairs - Recasing Vertical Description

P01 P01 P01 P01 P03 P03 P03 P01 P03 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 P01 S Drawing / doc. no. rev. Drawing / doc. no. NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000500 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000501 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000502 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000503 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000504 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000505 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000506 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000507 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000508 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000509 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000510 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000511 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000512 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000513 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000514 NHE_127523-2405-000-WPA-DDR-C-000515 Subchapter Numbers drawings with planning in accordance Condition 3 - Planning the discharge of conditions: for A) prepared to Stage information (relevant Additional supporting

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Water Street bridge

fig 3.1.iii fig 3.1.iii

Subchapter Numbers | 46 Page canal basin canal

Woolam Place Woolam

Design Guide Design fig 3.1.ii fig 3.1.ii fig 3.1.i fig 3.1.i

Subchapter Numbers S 3.1.4 Other elements columns could street street lilghting including the Some furniture of be described as a heritage being of / pastiche style, and there are a variety different of signage styles. 3.1.3 surfaces Existing ground Liverpool and Road Water of junction the at pavements The existing majority the materials; various in are large stone Street are paved The finish. surface the to finishes ‘riven’ a are north flags with paving tarmac and white- is conventional roadway and the lessof value, lining. Areas north the to Castlefield the Viaduct and south of are and are finished in utilitarian control, private predominantlyin materials such as tarmac and gravel. Subchapter Numbers 3.1.1 description Outline Castlefield Viaduct is Thean almost existing sequence continuous in certain broken 3.1.ii), and masonryof structures3.1.i brick in (fig. or iron bridges. steel locations is grade-II by It its length for listed to interruptions One the of Station. Piccadilly Irwell River to from the attractively which is 3.1.iii), Street bridge (fig. Water viaduct is the the functional restrictions height (the it doesdetailed, although have Liverpool Road movements). presents vehicular constraints to bridge; this Street adjacent to a junction at against Water terminates traffic this junction. grade-Ithe overlooks station building listed construction the Trinity of until route; quiet Street a relatively is Water it carriedtraffic. significantly more Way 3.1.2 structures Existing The majority arches, viaduct similar is red the of brick of vaulted (but identical) not structural spans. The structure curves on plan, Street space between the with Water piers varying accordingly. bridge is constructed from a series decorated of arched ribs which bridges as vertically parapets.extend Various on either elevation are varyingin Street and repair they and of conditions cross Water cleanliness.

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016

Subchapter Numbers | 47 Page Design Guide Design The existing brick parapets The Castlefield partially be Viaduct the existing will of alignments and track associated new the accommodate to removed ballast. The replacement parapet be (inclined 6 degrees) at will specialist the input Following faced plate. a weathered steel with brickviaduct independentwidenings existing are completely the of differently. two structures the of moving nature the to due summarises seriesa through diagramsprocess the of 3.1.iv Figure be undertaken will repair and that extension demolition, the of for viaduct. the of widening Cast Bridge Iron Grade listed (located II TheCOL at 125A existing Castlefield the Viaduct,will with which is listed Street) on Water bridge metal through’ and ‘half two replaced new be removed by Street. The southernstructures, each separately Water spanning carry bridge will on continue which lines realigned Bolton new the Castlefield the Viaduct,the northern and bridgethe OrdsallChord be will Street carriageway Water the headroom to Minimum lines. maintained under bridge both structures. 3.1.7 Priorities arch should recognisethe widening role Thethe by façadecreated a pedestrian one side of to as elevation the provide potentially it will commercialstreet featuring such activities as / food / drink. retail As an standard. are appropriate of materials and a result, the detailing heritage with align standards will arch each profile concrete To masonry a visual existing the offset match slightly achieve behind, to break between two. the The effects Ordsall the of surrounding Chord ground on the a sufficientlyshould be of reflectquality to high importance the of heritagethe fabric city the and aspirations the of council and the Water The of junction adjacent space sites. the at of developers setting the terms of of in beStreet improved and Liverpool will Road heritage the the impacts of mitigate to Liverpool Station, the Road Chord structure opposite. new

Subchapter Numbers S 3.1.6 infrastructureRail works necessary the into bring tracks the Chord the thread position to To Bridge it is necessary and Stephenson’s between Place for Woolam altered the this, to addition In south. be the widened viaduct to the to Water existing the of geometryrequiresremoval the tracks the of Street arched bridge. The first the consistof componentsof Ordsall Chord development gantries line and realignment track signal situated and overhead new (MSJ&AR) Castlefield existing the of on top Viaduct. viaduct This carries rail a double track. lines, Bolton the The arches beneath viaduct are the each numbered reference for these are identifiedthe drawings on purposes as COL); to (referred document. this which accompany be widened viaduct will the side of south west the COL 117, At between Irwell. widened Basin This Castlefield the the andRiver brick viaduct besection existing constructed the will adjacent to masonry lines, arches realigned accommodate the Bolton and will Ordsall turn offthe new the Chord and lines associated their of structures The new will walkways. maintenance (700mm wide) piers reinforcedconcrete consist insitu a pre-cast of with concrete arch and spandrel above. Subchapter Numbers 3.1.5 Constraintsopportunities and Liverpool to Street forms gateway the bridge onThe Water existing Spinningfields the Manchesterand to this Station andRoad beyond north. the regeneration structures to Quays The new should site perform to existing the continue Along southside of the role. this the into façade facing a new create viaduct arch widenings will street and form a potential hence side, regeneration they on this site frontage commercial for activities. issues the Stage of raised A includesAs a continuation section in 2.2, to the south from route firstthe inter-connecting the elementsof traffic the loads on Way north.the construction Since the Trinity of reduced andhence Street have anis there opportunity Water give to character. areathis a pedestrian- and cyclist-focussed

[for further area[for this details of refer drawings 100001, to 100002 - 155 inclusive] 100151 and 3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 3.1.8.3 Lighting (Planning Condition 4) COL be lit; Street will that Water bridgesThere over are three key Arch, MOSI bridge the Line and Pineapple the and Hobson’s 125A Bridge. These been treatment bridges selected a lighting have for objects streetscape the in night them at as key highlight which will and reduce ‘tunnel the effect’ bridges the over of a canopy forming street. the largest the is the of Startingstreet, COL125A the end western of the at underside the onto light wash is to Thebridges be design lit. intent to bridge the of structure street. Luminaires from the either side of a provide to level high at structural the walls to be mounted will Cool colour light solution. temperature maintenance low free, glare the to finish paint new shall be the used augment colour the of to shall lighting Highways N/A. underside bridge the of deck (Lux level: users). road for be provided be used will as a pedestrian COL 125 Arch’, The adjacent ‘Hobson’s be provided space will this to The ambient lighting route. and cycle barrel the base vault of the at mounted luminaires linear LED via effectThis uplight uniform arch. a the oneither side andprovide to approach practical a pleasing and which provides solution aesthetic 25lx 50lx average, (Lux level: vault the form of the alsohighlights minimum). The primary Street between route Liverpool and Road Water South has been pass buses corner the at to designed allow and to eastbound wide and 2.0m advisory 1.5m provides of routes cycle StreetNorth Water designed is Theinto turning southbound. wide to cars occasional and private with vehicles HGVs light for use by Street. service on Water developments future potential between road The bridge route Liverpool and Road Princes’ forms part used 6 and Network Cycle is well National of Route Increased pedestrian cyclists. by numbers due are anticipated area. this in proposed The Greater Manchester to developments DesignCycling Guidance requirements outlines sharing for space between pedestrians, Through and vehicles. discussion with cyclist Manchester Cityto confirmed it was Council it is that appropriate Street as predicted a “Quiet Street” the high class to due Water Water pedestrians traffic of volume. and low andlevels cyclists on-carriageway accommodate both enoughStreet wide is not to lanes and proposed the cycle pedestrian wide Shared footways. conflict canin and is leadonly appropriate to / cycleways footway pedestrianareas demand. The low “Quiet Street” of and cycle pedestrians of free footways movement on the allows environment cycles. for continuity provision and provides of

Subchapter Numbers | 48 Page Design Guide Design 3.1.8.2 4) Condition (Planning Furniture Street new does of propose introduction not works This the the stage of benches specificfences or similar and gates elements. railings, New design a similar and existing colour the be scheme to are to to Castlefield the Viaduct. arches in metalwork to is currently Street / Liverpool junction, Road Water tree to An existing it is proposed be placed; located where pier the is to to widening on away location 2m a new another in treewith existing replace the the to is the alsoThis case a postbox with 2.8.6). (fig. junction the near a be location located to Street which is to south east Water of necessary the consultation with following parties.

Subchapter Numbers S 3.1.8.1 Paving and surfacing - Planning condition 5 & condition 11 been selected have as appropriate 3.1.xiv) - 3.1.ix materials (fig. Paving and townscape historic the terms of in surrounding context the to area. the of values Thishas a palette in resulted focussed around high-quality finishes, to sit alongsidechosen the stone elementsof be lifted which are to and re-laid. pavements existing stage material in A is diamond sawn The paving predominant new difference the delineate between and other this To Yorkstone. setts diamond-sawn granite strips of narrow materials, are proposed. adjacent to existing surfaces the into Replacement tie will highway areas. paving historic Liverpool there are Road large areas existing of To flags, it is proposedclean liftstones, stone and to these existing and structures. As layout we new the to re-lay relation them in laid in is to Street, yorkstone Water from Liverpool to Road move thresholds key slabs. To paving concrete replacement existing the of entrancesand surface existing the be diamond-sawn laid with is to that kerbs setts. concrete granite the is proposed continue It to a robust a surface detail with the provide to will finish appropriate adjacent stone. Street and Liverpool is proposed Road Water The of junction becometo a priority macadam the surface with junction finish configuration. new the to reinstated 3.1.8 11) (Condition details and materials Proposed a small ledge / pier relationship skewback the of nature the Due to LED a continuous feature will where this appropriate be created; will soffit the and to above illuminance toprovide 3.1.vii) fitting (fig. light be connected will This down to pedestrian level. down reflectedlight The conduits face via recessed outer concrete. the street level to into a toprovide 3.1.viii) be finished differently is to (fig. skewback the of visualbreak betweenpre-cast the surfaces and concrete in-situ of spandrel the and pier respectively. piers the feeds it is proposeddrainageinto and power for integrate To a recessed front the have elementeach channel concrete to set into piersthe the faceof runto the up and continue This will pier. the of spandrels.The the channel open the dividing face of parapet above, be closedwill off access a demountable to use the of through infill metal plate. Subchapter Numbers further area[for this details of refer drawings 100102 to - 105 inclusive]

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 Kerb roposed P Yorkstone Tree grilleTree inlaid with paving

fig 3.1.xii 3.1.xii fig fig 3.1.x fig 3.1.x fig 3.1.xiv fig 3.1.xiv

Subchapter Numbers | 49 Page Granite setts Macadam Blister tactile - granite - tactile Blister

fig 3.1.xi fig 3.1.xi fig 3.1.ix fig 3.1.ix Design Guide Design fig 3.1.xiii 3.1.xiii fig

Subchapter Numbers he t ight l

hat t

raffic o t s

with (

unction j

he t unction

j f

ignalised s mphasis

rrently rimary cu p

he he t t

S primary Liverpool Street to connects Water route south of the south of the Street to being than north (rather Road Water of Street) Water lines) a prioritycontrol) give-way to (with junction [for further area[for this details of refer 100130] drawing to • Changing • Changing 3.1.8.4 Highways (Planning Conditions 5 and 14) application TWAO the in design shown proposal that An alternative to has been discussions through Manchester with developed City andCouncil Allied This support has London. been to developed the for ambitions The long-term section in goals outlines the 3.1.5. become Street to high- a Water for intend Manchester site Quays priority lower quality being given vehicles realm space public with that and pedestrians. of cyclists than development the Whilst project is on a longer timescaleNorthern the than it is the works Hub Ordsall the firstthat Chord project the in intended can steps provide future. strategy and agenda the set the this for developing main design principles underpin proposal the junction: the for Two Moving northMoving here street along the MOSI is bridge. The intention bridge the colonnade itself which historic but the highlight to is not formused part to structure the beneath original of bridge the this in conjunction in Lighting, description). for sectionlocation (see 3.1.18 area, this in treatment has been a paving the create usedwith to very luminaireswith specific downlight this areawith to character create is to The intention ground. the spotlight beamnarrow to optics N/A. surface pavement contrast on the high (Lux pools light level: of users). road for shall be provided lighting Highways three bridges the of Line bridge The Pineapple third the is and the Luminaires design the usedapproach COL125A. to here for is similar light wash to road either the side of be positioned level will high at Highways N/A. across underside the bridge the deck of (Lux level: users). road for shall be provided lighting Subchapter Numbers area this (in particularThese give changes to from are the intended a calmer northwards) junction character focussedpedestrians on north the to emphasis changing the By for route the and cyclists. of become and removal will the vehicles vehicles, less to attractive street associated furniture signalised with junctions (traffic lights, square. a public atmosphere the more akin to give to is intended etc.)

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C January 2016 iagram of proposed COL railing infill iagram proposed COL of ite photograph of existing COL railing infill roposed brickwork infill to sit D S P

fig 3.1.xvii 3.1.xvii fig fig 3.1.xv fig 3.1.xx fig 3.1.xx viaduct widened to adjacent

Subchapter Numbers | 50 Page ite photograph of existing brick infill against roposed brickwork infill to sit adjacent to existing roposed brickwork infillto sit adjacentto existing isual of proposed railing infill isual of V P S

fig 3.1.xvi 3.1.xvi fig Design Guide Design fig 3.1.xix fig 3.1.xix brick viaduct fig 3.1.xix fig 3.1.xix brickwork COL original

Subchapter Numbers S

Subchapter Numbers 3.1.8.5 Infill methods to to arches structures, similar As Castlefield other the Viaduct with houses spaces beneath railway. the functions vaulted various inside the Ordsall area the the In of Chord these enclosed include spaces opencontrolled arches privately sides), to both facades infill (with and pavements). (roads and routes public railings) (secured with The majority viaduct, uses remain as of per are to existing the does widening the of certain change configuration the however areas. As a general vaults current the defining the rule, edgesof following detailretain a similar fenced will or open) infilled, (i.e. solid where an existing i.e. structures; constructionthe new the of be demolished viaduct, it will the of south elevation the sits in wall the widening which hasto arch wall and infill replaced a new with effectively lengthened space created. internal the

3.1 tageA: Castlefield ViaductWater andStreet Ordsall Chord e m a r n e t p a h C