A Brief History of the Westminster Assembly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Brief History of the Westminster Assembly THEOLOGY EVANGEL Autumn 1993 73 ...'. Last, we must be students of the Word for ' ... Special Study Entitled: The Challenge of Evangelical the mysteries of God . cannot be discerned in Theology. themselves ... but we behold them only in his word 2. Sermon on Eph. 3:14-19. '.19 Are we beholding wondrous things out of 3. Sermon on Eph. 1:4-6 . God's law? 4. Comm. on Is. 6:1. We have seen from this brief and cursory glance at 5. Comm. on Is. 6:1. Calvin's thoughts on what it means to know God, 6. Comm. on Is. 6:5. that it means much more than to know about God. To 7. Comm. on Is. 6:2. be Reformed or to be a Calvinist it is not enough '. 8. Comm. on In. 14:21. if the knowledge of Christ dwell on the tongue or 9. Comm. on In. 14:23. flutter in the brain'. 20 It must be that knowledge 10. Comm. on Lk. 24:32ff. which consists principally in the sense of the heart. Is 11. Comm. on Lk. 24:32ff. this the Calvinism we hold to today? 12. Comm. on Lk. 24:32ff. 13. Comm. on Ex. 33: 18ff. 14. Comm. on Ex. 33:18ff. 15. Comm. on Acts 7:55ff. 16. Comm. on Acts 7:55ff. Footnotes 17. Sermon on Eph. 1:15-18. 18. Sermon on Eph. 1:15-18. 1. Wallace, R. S. 1987, 'Calvin's Approach to 19. List 3.2.14. Theology, Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology, 20. Sermon on Eph. 3:14-19. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY Wayne R. Spear July 1, 1993 marked the 350th anniversary of the The Background of the Assembly beginning of the Westminster Assembly, a gathering whose work has profoundly shaped the theology of The Westminster Assembly did not meet in a place those churches which bear the name Presbyterian, as of quiet for undisturbed theological reflection. Rather, well as others such as Congregationalists and some it met in the nation's capital, a stone's throw from the Baptists. Houses of Parliament, in a time of civil war in The Westminster Assembly was not a regular England. ecclesiastical assembly but an advisory commission James I of England, famous for his reluctant support called by the English Parliament to propose legislation of the 'King James' version of the Bible, was succeeded for the restructuring of the Church of England in a on the throne by his son Charles, who was more time of great social and political turmoil. The Assembly ruthless but less politically astute than his father. was composed of ministers ('divines') and laymen Charles I, with the eager assistance of William Laud, who were members of the Houses of Parliament. the Archbishop of Canterbury, tried to rule without They met in Westminster Abbey for more than five the assistance or interference of Parliament for 11 and a half years, and during that time they produced years. Along with economic policies which many documents which are well known and in use today: regarded as ruinous, he also followed a course of The Confession of Faith, Larger Catechism and Shorter revising the liturgy of the Church of England to make Catechism. it more like many practices of the Roman Catholic The commemoration of this anniversary of the Church. Those who resisted were punished by im­ beginning of the Westminster Assembly, it is hoped, prisonment, exile and mutilation. will stimulate new interest in the history of the The resisters were usually part of a group within Asembly, and new study of the remarkable docu­ the Church of England known to their enemies as ments which they produced. 'Puritans'. Deeply influenced by the principles of the 74 EV ANGEL Autumn 1993 THEOLOGY Calvinistic Reformation, they had struggled since the Baillie, Letters and Journals, p. 107). There they sat reign of Elizabeth I to bring their church more closely according to rank, the Lords nearest the fire. into harmony with biblical teaching. Through that time, many future members of Parliament had been Views Represented in the Assembly influenced by the Puritan preachers. In the 1640s, resistance to the policies of Charles I moved from the pulpits and the streets to Parliament, especially the Historians frequently write of the 'parties' of the House of Commons. John Pym, Speaker of the House, Assembly. These were not organized groups or cau­ was a convinced Puritan-and later a member of the cuses, but rather shifting alliances which represented Westminster Assembly. a number of differing points of view on certain issues, Charles' treasury was drained by his efforts to usually having to do with church government. suppress the revolution of the Covenanters in Scotland Some of those named as members of the Assembly which began with the National Covenant of 1638, so were committed to episcopal church government, in­ he reluctantly called the English Parliament into cluding three bishops. None of them participated in session in order to obtain more tax money. The the main work of the Assembly. Parliament refused to grant revenues unless Charles A number of the English ministers were 'pragmatic would agree to respond to their grievances. Among Presbyterians', open to presbyterial church govern­ their demands was a change in church government, ment as the only viable option in the circumstances, for the Puritans who led the House of Commons but favored limited rule by bishops. For example, were determined to removed from power the bishops Edward Reynolds, who helped draft the Westminster in whom Charles found some of his strongest allies. Confession, later served as Bishop of Norwich. In 1642, when negotiations failed, Charles attempted A small number of Assembly members were called to invade the House of Commons to arrest the Erastians. They defended the supremacy of the civil leaders. The armed guards turned his forces back, magistrate in the church. Their most eminent spokes­ and Charles withdrew from London. The great English man was a member of Parliament, John Selden. They Civil War had begun. had powerful allies in Parliament, where there was much distruct of a church which would operate with The Calling and Operation of the Assembly some independence from the state. There were many in the Assembly who were com­ mitted to presbyterian church government as a matter The Parliament (excluding those who supported the of conviction. They had been taught by the writings King) adopted an ordinance on June 12, 1643, calling of the Elizabethan Puritan leaders Thomas Cartwright together an assembly of 'learned and godly Divines, and WaIter Travers. On most matters they agreed and others', for assistance in establishing a govern­ with the Scottish commissioners. ment in the Church of England which would be 'most Another small but influential group was the agreeable to God's holy word, and most apt to English Independents (the name was given by their procure and preserve the peace of the Church' opponents; they held that theirs was a 'middle way' (Mitchell, The Westminster Assembly, p. ix). The ordin­ between independency and presbyterianism. Thomas ance named 10 members of the House of Lords, 20 Goodwin and Philip Nye were their most prominent members of the House of Commons and 121 ministers. spokesmen. Dissenters in Scotland, including Re­ Not all of those named actually attended; the King formed Presbyterians, later came to adopt views of forbade attendance, and some of those nominated church membership which resembled theirs. obeyed. Sixty-nine gathered for the opening session. As the time the Assembly met stretched out into years, some grew ill or weary. The usual attendance Scottish Participation in the Assembly was probably around 60. Parliament had named the moderator of the The members of the Westminster Assembly were Assembly and two scribes. Almost unlimited debate Englishmen; they met on English soil, to debate the was permitted; members often complained of the doctrine, worship and government of the Church of length of the debates. Thomas Goodwin told his England. The work of the Assembly, however, had brothers that if they studied more they would debate its most lasting effect in the Church of Scotland and less! Decisions were by majority vote. One notable her daughter churches. God's providence used mili­ vote which passed by that margin was in favor of tary and political developments to bring this surprising women deacons; the action was quietly dropped in outcome. the final editing. In 1643, the English Parliament seemed to be losing The rules provided that a member who disagreed the war against the King. They sent a delegation to with any action could have his dissent recorded, and Scotland, which had already successfully resisted give his reasons. In the time of civil war, that measure Charles, to obtain the help of the Scottish Army. The meant more than the relief of conscience. If the treaty under which Scotland agreed to send assistance Parliament lost the war, members of the Assembly was called the 'Solemn League and Covenant'. Its would face trials for treason, and a written record of terms included a commitment by the countries to dissent might prove helpful. seek to bring the churches of England, Ireland and At first the Assembly met in the ornate chapel of Scotland into 'the nearest conjunction and uniformity Henry VII, behind the main sanctuary of the Abbey. in religion, confession of faith, form of church gov­ When cold weather came, they moved to the smaller ernment, directory for worship and catechising'. Jerusalem Chamber, which had 'a good fire' (Robert To implement that pledge, commissioners were THEOLOGY EV ANGEL Autumn 1993 75 sent to participate in the Westminster Assembly.
Recommended publications
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Mobilizing the Metropolis: Politics, Plots and Propaganda in Civil War London, 1642-1644 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gh4h08w Author Downs, Jordan Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Mobilizing the Metropolis: Politics, Plots and Propaganda in Civil War London, 1642-1644 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Jordan Swan Downs December 2015 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Eacott Dr. Randolph Head Dr. J. Sears McGee Copyright by Jordan Swan Downs 2015 The Dissertation of Jordan Swan Downs is approved: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude to all of the people who have helped me to complete this dissertation. This project was made possible due to generous financial support form the History Department at UC Riverside and the College of Humanities and Social Sciences. Other financial support came from the William Andrew’s Clark Memorial Library, the Huntington Library, the Institute of Historical Research in London, and the Santa Barbara Scholarship Foundation. Original material from this dissertation was published by Cambridge University Press in volume 57 of The Historical Journal as “The Curse of Meroz and the English Civil War” (June, 2014). Many librarians have helped me to navigate archives on both sides of the Atlantic. I am especially grateful to those from London’s livery companies, the London Metropolitan Archives, the Guildhall Library, the National Archives, and the British Library, the Bodleian, the Huntington and the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle 1909 Michaelmas
    IV CONTENTS. PAGE From a Latin Hymn on St John the Evangelist Voluntaries 224 The Hymn Book 226 Halley's Comet 229 "Cornish Breakers" 236 Obituary 237 Our Chronicle 239 The Library 247 Notes tram 277 the College Records (con/iuued) In 28'i\ Memoriam : Edward VII. THE EAGLE. "By your Worship 317 and a Dymchurch Jury" St 318 Venus' Eve October Term 1909. The Rose by Other Names 328 The Book Invisible 332 Hallucinations 345 The Upper River 347 THE QUATER CENTENARY OF The New Hymn Book and 353 Certain of Our Own Poets LADY MARGARET. Epigram 354 The Hand 358 of Plato in Modern Legislation Catullus 359 [llN St Peter's day, 29 June 1909, the four­ hundredth anniversary of Lady Margaret's The New Window in Chapel 363 death, the Dean of Westminster preached in Commemoration Sermon 364 the Abbey at the afternoon service on our Unveiling of the New Window 377 Memorial Service 387 saintly Foundress, whose tomb, by Torrigiano, is one Reviews 389 of the jewels of the church. Obituary: 390 Near midnight a party viewed the tomb and other Rev Herbert Edward Trotter M.A. monuments by lamp-light, and the Dean distributed Rev Edwarcl Kerslake Kerslake M.A .. 396 photographs of Torrigiano's masterpiece. Richard Burton 398 Worthington M. A. At eight o'clock there met in the Jerusalem Chamber Our Chronicle 399 guests representing all the foundations of Lady Margaret, The Library 400 and all the places where she has left a name. The hosts List of Subscribers, 421 1909-10. were the Dean and Chapter of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Providence Island Company on 28Th September 1629 Letters Of
    The Providence Island Company On 28th September 1629 letters of marque were issued for an expedition to be mounted to St Catalina, an island in the Caribbean (later to be renamed Providence Island). Subscriptions were invited from Lord Saye's circle of powerful political and business friends, who were opposed to the arbitrary rule of the king, for twenty shares at £200 per head. In the summer of 1630 the first meeting of shareholders was held in Brooke House, Holborn, London (held there to avoid the plague in the country). On 4th December a patent was sealed granting the formal incorporation of the splendidly named company of 'The Governor and Company of Adventurers of the City of Westminster for the Plantation of the Islands of Providence, Henrietta and adjacent islands laying upon the coast of America'; known as 'The Providence Island Company'. The total cost of the Patent and fees was £60. The name Providence had great significance at that time; the Adventurers (men who advanced venture capital) believed they were responding to divine will in founding the settlement. They were casting themselves on God's providence. The project could only succeed with God's approval.4 St Catalina, as the Spanish called the island, was situated in the south-west corner of the Caribbean, off the coast of Nicaragua; it is six miles long by four wide and was considered, in the seventeenth century, to be the choicest of the Caribbean islands. It had an equable climate, was fertile and salubrious; with plenty of water. It was easily fortified and there were no venomous creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • I the Committee of Safety
    .· (~. ll II Ii ) ' THE COMMITTEE OF SAFETY. 11 "A thesis submitted to the ,, faculty of the Graduate School of the University of • Minnesota by Etheleen Frances ;emp in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ii degree of Master of Arts, May 5, 1911. 1;1 I Ii II Ii 11 ' :S I:BLI OGRAPHY. l. Source Material 1. Journals of the House of Lords, vol. V and VI. Journals of the House of Commons, vol. II and III. These contain the greater portion of the material on the Committee of Safety. 2. Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts. London, 1874 etc. These volumes contain here and there a com­ munication to or from the Committee of Safety but have much less material that might be expected. References found:- 4th Report p 262. 5th Report pp. 48, 54, 56, 63, 65, 69, 80, 107, 114. 7th Report pp. 550-588. 10th Report App. 6 pp. 87-88. 13th Report App. 1 p. 104. 3. Calendar of State Papers. Domestic 1641-1644 London, 1887-8 lla.ny order for military supplies are given in the State Papers but not in full. 4. Rushworth,John, Historical collections, 8 vol. London, 1682-1701. Compilation of declarations and proclamations. Vol. 3 and 7 contain material on the Committee. They contain valuable proclamations of the King which cannot be found elsewhere. 5. Somers, Lord. Tracts, 13 vol. London, 1809-1815. Has several remonstrances of value. ){) 1 ~ ( ' ,.... 6. Whitacre. Diary Add. M S S 31, 116, fol. Had notes from first six months of the Committee period especially.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION This volume publishes the papers and correspondence of the Hotham family during the civil wars and interregnum. The head of the family and first baronet, Sir John Hotham, is well known in the national narrative because of his critical role in denying the king entry to Hull on 23 April 1642. This episode ignited much contemporary controversy, raising the stakes in a pamphlet war between the king and his parliamentary opponents, and making armed conflict far more likely. It has attracted considerable attention from constitutional historians who have debated its legal ramifications, while political and military historians have recognized that the king’s failure to seize the large arms magazine at Hull badly undermined the royalist war effort. Yet, despite their national importance in 1642, the Hotham family’s papers have only rarely been utilized by academics. Late twentieth-century historians such as J.T. Cliffe, Barbara English, and Peter Roebuck drew upon the collection to inform their work on the wider theme of Yorkshire gentry landowners,1 but few others have been to Hull to access the archive. This also reflects a relative neglect of northern England in civil war historiography. There has been no biography of either of the Hothams, and their most recent family histories date from as long ago as the First World War. 2 This is unfortunate, because Sir John Hotham and his eldest son were extremely colourful and enigmatic figures, whose letters reveal much about the cultural attitudes of the English gentry in the 1640s. This volume seeks to redress this imbalance and restore the centrality of the Hotham family to the parliamentary cause.
    [Show full text]
  • EB WARD Diary
    THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE Transcribed and prepared by Dr. M.M. Knappen, Professor of English History, University of Chicago. Edited by John W. Cowart Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE. Copyright © 2007 by John W. Cowart. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by Lulu Press. Apart from reasonable fair use practices, no part of this book’s text may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address Bluefish Books, 2805 Ernest St., Jacksonville, Florida, 32205. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data has been applied for. Lulu Press # 1009823. Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info SAMUEL WARD 1572 — 1643 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………………..…. 1 THE TWO SAMUEL WARDS……………………. …... 13 SAMUEL WARD’S LISTIING IN THE DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY…. …. 17 DR. M.M. KNAPPEN’S PREFACE ………. …………. 21 THE PURITAN CHARACTER IN THE DIARY. ….. 27 DR. KNAPPEN’S LIFE OF SAMUEL WARD …. …... 43 THE DIARY TEXT …………………………….……… 59 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ DEDICATION TO THE KING……………………………………….… 97 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ PREFACE TO BIBLE READERS ………………………………………….….. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………….…….. 129 INTRODUCTION by John W. Cowart amuel Ward, a moderate Puritan minister, lived from 1572 to S1643. His life spanned from the reign of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, through that of King James. and into the days of Charles I. Surviving pages of Ward’s dated diary entries run from May 11, 1595, to July 1, 1632.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnston of Warriston
    F a m o u s Sc o t s S e r i e s Th e following Volum es are now ready M S ARLYLE H ECT O R . M C HERSO . T HO A C . By C A P N LL N R M Y O L H T SM E T O . A A A SA . By IP AN A N H U GH MI R E T H LE SK . LLE . By W. K I A H K ! T LOR INN Es. JO N NO . By A . AY R ERT U RNS G BR EL SET OUN. OB B . By A I L D O H GE E. T H E BA L A I ST S. By J N DDI RD MER N Pro fe sso H ER KLESS. RICH A CA O . By r SIR MES Y SI MPSON . EV E L T R E S M SO . JA . By B AN Y I P N M R P o fesso . G R E BLA I KIE. T HOMAS CH AL E S. By r r W A D N MES S ELL . E T H LE SK. JA BO W . By W K I A I M L E OL H T SME T O . T OB AS S O L T T . By IP AN A N U G . T O MON D . FLET CHER O F SA LT O N . By . W . R U P Sir GEOR E DO L S. T HE BLACKWOOD G O . By G UG A RM M LEOD OH ELL OO .
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Williams, Richard Title: County and municipal government in Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Somerset 1649- 1660. General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT IN CORNWALL, DEVON, DORSET AND SOMERSET 1649-1660 by RICHARD WILLIAMS xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A THESIS Submitted to the University of Bristol for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1981 XXXXXXX*1XXXXXXXXXXX County and Municipal Government in Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Somerset 1649-1660.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Soul Recreation: Spiritual Marriage and Ravishment in the Contemplative-Mystical Piety of Isaac Ambrose SCHWANDA, TOM How to cite: SCHWANDA, TOM (2009) Soul Recreation: Spiritual Marriage and Ravishment in the Contemplative-Mystical Piety of Isaac Ambrose, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/55/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 DURHAM UNIVERSITY SOUL RECREATION: SPIRITUAL MARRIAGE AND RAVISHMENT IN THE CONTEMPLATIVE- MYSTICAL PIETY OF ISAAC AMBROSE TOM SCHWANDA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN TOTAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGION NOVEMBER 2009 ABSTRACT Tom Schwanda Soul Recreation: Spiritual Marriage and Ravishment in the Contemplative-Mystical Piety of Isaac Ambrose This thesis examines the theology and piety of Isaac Ambrose (1604-1664), a moderate Lancashire Puritan minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 UNITY IN DIVERSITY: ENGLISH PURITANS AND THE PURITAN REFORMATION 1603-1689 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. Carel Stolker volgens besluit van het College voor promoties te verdedigen op 7 November 2013 klokke 15:00 uur door Randall James Pederson geboren te Everett, Washington, USA in 1975 Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. dr. Gijsbert van den Brink Prof. dr. Richard Alfred Muller, Calvin Theological Seminary, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA Leden: Prof. dr. Ernestine van der Wall Dr. Jan Wim Buisman Prof. dr. Henk van den Belt Prof. dr. Willem op’t Hof Dr. Willem van Vlastuin Contents Part I: Historical Method and Background Chapter One: Historiographical Introduction, Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ............. 1 1.1 Another Book on English Puritanism? Historiographical Justification .................. 1 1.2 Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ...................................................................... 20 1.2.1 Narrative and Metanarrative .............................................................................. 25 1.2.2 Structure ................................................................................................................... 31 1.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]