DOCSLIB.ORG

Polychaeta, Nereididae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polychaeta, Nereididae) A revision of Nereidinae (Polychaeta, Nereididae) Torkild Bakken Dr. scient. thesis Section of Natural History Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim 2004 ISBN 82-471-6205-9 ISBN 82-471-6204-0 (electronic) Preface A copy of ”Identification of Annelida Polychaeta from northern European and adjacent Arctic waters” is a document of personal historic interest. Across the pages are scribbled short annotations beside several polychaete families, and two are circled, Sphaerodoridae and Nereididae. The annotations were made in the office of Torleif Holthe at the Directorate of Nature Management early in 1994, and marked the start of my cand scient education a few months later. I have much to thank Torleif for as my supervisor during my cand scient and dr scient education, he has taught me a lot about polychaetes especially relating to northern areas and a lot about general marine biology, the numerous long discussions we have had, often about completely different topics than polychaetes is much appreciated. He has always been helpful and supportive, and put in a lot of effort when it came to applications and job opportunities. I would like to thank Jon-Arne Sneli for passing along all that marine biology knowledge, not only as my supervisor during the cand scient period but also later. I have really appreciated the collaboration we have had, and still have. I am also grateful to Jarle Mork who has been my supervisor during this work, the quick replies of enquires from me have been valuable. This work would have been something else without the help and support of Robin Wilson. He taught me a lot more than I knew from before about nereidids, everything I know about DELTA, gave valuable insight into biogeography and provided lab space at Museum Victoria in Melbourne. The long discussions about specimens, taxa, methods, analyses, software, theories and projects have been very fruitful, as has those about Australian wine. I stayed two periods at Museum Victoria (MV), five month in 2001/2002 and seven month in 2002/2003 (climatic migration). I would like to thank staff, students and volunteers in the Marine Biology Section at MV for memorable moments and a lot of help. Thanks goes especially to Joanne Taylor for good discussions and valuable help in systematic questions, Gary Poore, Tim O’Hara, Mark Norman, Genefor Walker-Smith, Melissa Storey and Rachael King for sharing their knowledge and always being helpful, Tim also helped during fieldwork as did Jan Watson and David Staples, and Chris Rowley and Tania Bardsley for help in the lab. Janette Norman and Renae Pratt are thanked for their assistance, help and expertise with the molecular work. I would also like to thank Martin Gomon and Dianne Bray, and Les Christidis head of Sciences Department for making the opportunity for me to stay for a whole year in the department. During the time in Australia Chris Glasby were a great host when I visited Darwin, as was Pat Hutchings in Sydney. Pat along with Kate Attwood and Lynda Avery are thanked for a great field trip in northern New South Wales in February 2003. At last, but not least, I would like to thank Rosalind and Barry Poole to let me be a part of their family during my first stay in Melbourne, they taught me a lot about Australia and Australian culture (and heaps of other things). Librarians Else-Mari Leirvoll and Tore Moen and their colleagues at Gunnerusbiblioteket, NTNU have provided enormous help in finding all the strange, not to mention old, literature I have needed. This work would have been very different without their help and effort. After the 7th International Polychaete Conference I got the opportunity to participate in the Postconference Course in cladistics held at Sandgerdi, Iceland, for which I am grateful to Elín Sigvaldadottír, Fredrik Pleijel and Greg Rouse for organising and help during the course. I am also grateful to V.V. Khlebovich (St Petersburg) who provided translations of parts of his monograph on nereidids. Anja Schulze and Kristian Fauchald were very helpful and great hosts when I visited the Smithsonian Institution in December and January 2001/2002, as was Danny Eibye-Jacobsen when I visited Copenhagen in April and May 2002. I would also thank Arne Nygren for patiently answering a novice’s questions about genes and molecules. Staff at Section of Natural History and the former Department of Natural History (NTNU) are thanked for all help, it has been great to work here and I am especially grateful for the flexibility my position has been granted when it comes to travelling, time and that I was allowed to be undisturbed when I needed all the time I could get. I am especially grateful to Toril Loennechen Moen who has been a great discussion partner when no one else could answer questions relating to systematics, molecules and software (questions are still unanswered but we are getting there). Mari-Ann Østensen were of great help in the molecular lab. Mona Ødegården, Anita Kaltenborn and Dag Altin have been fantastic when the deadline moved much faster than I did, they have inked and prepared most figures in Paper III and Paper IV. Anita and Dag are also thanked for all the fun with different projects, and so is also Jussi Evertsen who has from time to time diverted my time to nudibranchs and diving trips. Thanks also goes to my parents for being so supportive throughout the years although they have not got a clue what all this has been all about, and to Mona who has been so patient the last few months. Finally I would like to thank the following persons for access to collections, logistics during visits, and loan of material (institution acronyms are found in Paper III and Paper IV): Kate Attwood, Penny Berents and Pat Hutchings (AM, Sydney), Harry ten Hove (AZM, Amsterdam), Chris Glasby (MAGNT, Darwin), Fredrik Pleijel (NMHN, Paris), Leslie Harris (NHMLAC, Los Angeles), Stefan Lundberg and Sabine Stöhr (SMNH, Stockholm), Anja Schulze and Kristian Fauchald (USNM, Washington DC), Angelika Brandt and Brigitte Hilbig (ZMH, Hamburg), Jon Anders Kongsrud (ZMUB, Bergen), Danny Eibye-Jacobsen (ZMUC, Copenhagen), Cathrine Vollelv (ZMUO, Oslo), Wim Vader (ZMUT, Tromsø). Financial support was provided by NTNU through a position as Research Fellow, and through grants from Sparebanken Midt-Norge and Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology (NTNU). The Norwegian Research Council (grants no 138717/419 and 151548/432) provided two scholarships that made it possible to stay 5+7 months at Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. A visit to the Zoological Museum, Copenhagen (ZMUC) was made available through a grant from the European Commission’s programme ”Transnational Access to Major Research Infrastructures” to COBICE (Copenhagen Biosystematics Center). Torkild Bakken Trondheim, 9 October 2003 Contents Preface................................................................................................................. 2 Contents............................................................................................................... 4 List of papers ....................................................................................................... 5 Abstract................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 The family name......................................................................................................... 8 Family Nereididae − relationships and supra-family classification............................. 8 Classification and Phylogeny of Nereididae − an historic review .................................... 9 Approaches........................................................................................................ 14 Morphological characters ......................................................................................... 14 An attempt to include molecular studies .................................................................. 14 Aims and summary of papers ............................................................................ 16 Discussion.......................................................................................................... 18 Conclusions and prospects for further work............................................................. 19 References......................................................................................................... 20 4 List of papers I. Bakken, T. 2002. A new species of Neanthes (Polychaeta: Nereididae) from southern Australia. Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 59: 327-331. II. Wilson, R. S., Bakken, T. & Glasby, C. J. 2003. Nereididae (Polychaeta) - A DELTA database of genera, and Australian species. In R. S. Wilson, P. A. Hutchings and C. J. Glasby (Eds), Polychaetes: An Interactive Identification Guide (pp. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing. III. Bakken, T. & Wilson, R.S. Phylogeny of nereidids (Polychaeta, Nereididae) with paragnaths. Submitted Zoologica Scripta. IV. Bakken, T. Revision of Pseudonereis (Polychaeta, Nereididae) based on type material. Manuscript. These are referred to in the text by the roman numerals. 5 Abstract Groups of taxa of the polychaete family Nereididae were studied with the aim of presenting a revision of the subfamily Nereidinae. Detailed description of characters starting with a selected group, Neanthes, was extended to include a wider range of species level taxa to include as much variation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blue Mussels (Mytilus Edulis Spp.) As Sentinel Organisms in Coastal Pollution Monitoring: a Review
    Accepted Manuscript Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review Jonny Beyer, Norman W. Green, Steven Brooks, Ian J. Allan, Anders Ruus, Tânia Gomes, Inger Lise N. Bråte, Merete Schøyen PII: S0141-1136(17)30266-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024 Reference: MERE 4356 To appear in: Marine Environmental Research Received Date: 20 April 2017 Revised Date: 28 July 2017 Accepted Date: 31 July 2017 Please cite this article as: Beyer, J., Green, N.W., Brooks, S., Allan, I.J., Ruus, A., Gomes, Tâ., Bråte, I.L.N., Schøyen, M., Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review, Marine Environmental Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution 2 monitoring: A review 3 Jonny Beyer a,*, Norman W. Green a, Steven Brooks a, Ian J. Allan a, Anders Ruus a,b , Tânia Gomes a, 4 Inger Lise N. Bråte a, Merete Schøyen a 5 a Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway 6 b University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway 7 *Corresponding author: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadallèen 21, NO-0349 OSLO, 8 Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Neanthes Limnicola Class: Polychaeta Order: Phyllodocida a Mussel Worm Family: Nereididae
    Phylum: Annelida Neanthes limnicola Class: Polychaeta Order: Phyllodocida A mussel worm Family: Nereididae Taxonomy: Depending on the author, Trunk: Very thick segments that are Neanthes is currently considered a separate wider than they are long, gently tapers or subspecies to the genus Nereis (Hilbig to posterior (Fig. 1). 1997). Nereis sensu stricto differs from the Posterior: Pygidium bears two, genus Neanthes because the latter genus styliform ventrolateral anal cirri that includes species with spinigerous notosetae are as long as last seven segments only. Furthermore, N. limnicola has most (Fig. 1) (Hartman 1938). recently been included in the genus (or Parapodia: The first two setigers are subgenus) Hediste due to the neuropodial uniramous. All other parapodia are biramous setal morphology (Sato 1999; Bakken and (Nereididae, Blake and Ruff 2007) where both Wilson 2005; Tusuji and Sato 2012). notopodia and neuropodia have acicular However, reproduction is markedly different in lobes and each lobe bears 1–3 additional, N. limnicola than other Hediste species (Sato medial and triangular lobes (above and 1999). Thus, synonyms of Neanthes below), called ligules (Blake and Ruff 2007) limnicola include Nereis limnicola (which was (Figs. 1, 5). The notopodial ligule is always synonymized with Neanthes lighti in 1959 smaller than the neuropodial one. The (Smith)), Nereis (Neanthes) limnicola, Nereis parapodial lobes are conical and not leaf-like (Hediste) limnicola and Hediste limnicola. or globular as in the family Phyllodocidae. (A The predominating name in current local parapodium should be removed and viewed intertidal guides (e.g. Blake and Ruff 2007) is at 100x for accurate identification). Neanthes limnicola.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (Marlin)
    The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Volume 1. Background to biotope research. Report to Cyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru / Countryside Council for Wales Contract no. FC 73-023-255G Dr Harvey Tyler-Walters, Charlotte Marshall, & Dr Keith Hiscock With contributions from: Georgina Budd, Jacqueline Hill, Will Rayment and Angus Jackson DRAFT / FINAL REPORT January 2005 Reference: Tyler-Walters, H., Marshall, C., Hiscock, K., Hill, J.M., Budd, G.C., Rayment, W.J. & Jackson, A., 2005. Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Report to Cyngor Cefn Gwlad Cymru / Countryside Council for Wales from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Marine Biological Association of the UK, Plymouth. [CCW Contract no. FC 73-023-255G] Description, sensitivity and monitoring of important Welsh biotopes Background 2 Description, sensitivity and monitoring of important Welsh biotopes Background The Marine Life Information Network® for Britain and Ireland (MarLIN) Description, temporal variation, sensitivity and monitoring of important marine biotopes in Wales. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................5 Crynodeb gweithredol ........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 2.4MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236 (2014) Published December 2014 ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://museumvictoria.com.au/about/books-and-journals/journals/memoirs-of-museum-victoria/ Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars EIVIND OUG1,* (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:EF42540F-7A9E-486F-96B7-FCE9F94DC54A), TORKILD BAKKEN2 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FA79392C-048E-4421-BFF8-71A7D58A54C7) AND JON ANDERS KONGSRUD3 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:4AF3F49E-9406-4387-B282-73FA5982029E) 1 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Region South, Jon Lilletuns vei 3, NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway ([email protected]) 2 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway ([email protected]) 3 University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway ([email protected]) * To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for re- assessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Neanthes Limnicola Class: Polychaeta, Errantia
    Phylum: Annelida Neanthes limnicola Class: Polychaeta, Errantia Order: Phyllodocida, Nereidiformia A mussel worm Family: Nereididae, Nereidinae Taxonomy: Depending on the author, Ne- wider than long, with a longitudinal depression anthes is currently considered a separate or (Fig. 2b). subspecies to the genus Nereis (Hilbig Trunk: Very thick segments that are 1997). Nereis sensu stricto differs from the wider than they are long, gently tapers to pos- genus Neanthes because the latter genus terior (Fig. 1). includes species with spinigerous notosetae Posterior: Pygidium bears two, styli- only. Furthermore, N. limnicola has most form ventrolateral anal cirri that are as long as recently been included in the genus (or sub- last seven segments (Fig. 1) (Hartman 1938). genus) Hediste due to the neuropodial setal Parapodia: The first two setigers are unira- morphology (Sato 1999; Bakken and Wilson mous. All other parapodia are biramous 2005; Tusuji and Sato 2012). However, re- (Nereididae, Blake and Ruff 2007) where both production is markedly different in N. limni- notopodia and neuropodia have acicular lobes cola than other Hediste species (Sato 1999). and each lobe bears 1–3 additional, medial Thus, synonyms of Neanthes limnicola in- and triangular lobes (above and below), called clude Nereis limnicola (which was synony- ligules (Blake and Ruff 2007) (Figs. 1, 5). The mized with Neanthes lighti in 1959 (Smith)), notopodial ligule is always smaller than the Nereis (Neanthes) limnicola, Nereis neuropodial one. The parapodial lobes are (Hediste) limnicola and Hediste limnicola. conical and not leaf-like or globular as in the The predominating name in current local in- family Phyllodocidae. (A parapodium should tertidal guides (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Namanereidinae (Polychaeta: Nereididae). Part 1, Taxonomy and Phylogeny
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 1999 Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 25 (1999). ISBN 0-7313-8856-9 The Namanereidinae (Polychaeta: Nereididae). Part 1, Taxonomy and Phylogeny CHRISTOPHER J. GLASBY National Institute for Water & Atmospheric Research, PO Box 14-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT. A cladistic analysis and taxonomic revision of the Namanereidinae (Nereididae: Polychaeta) is presented. The cladistic analysis utilising 39 morphological characters (76 apomorphic states) yielded 10,000 minimal-length trees and a highly unresolved Strict Consensus tree. However, monophyly of the Namanereidinae is supported and two clades are identified: Namalycastis containing 18 species and Namanereis containing 15 species. The monospecific genus Lycastoides, represented by L. alticola Johnson, is too poorly known to be included in the analysis. Classification of the subfamily is modified to reflect the phylogeny. Thus, Namalycastis includes large-bodied species having four pairs of tentacular cirri; autapomorphies include the presence of short, subconical antennae and enlarged, flattened and leaf-like posterior cirrophores. Namanereis includes smaller-bodied species having three or four pairs of tentacular cirri; autapomorphies include the absence of dorsal cirrophores, absence of notosetae and a tripartite pygidium. Cryptonereis Gibbs, Lycastella Feuerborn, Lycastilla Solís-Weiss & Espinasa and Lycastopsis Augener become junior synonyms of Namanereis. Thirty-six species are described, including seven new species of Namalycastis (N. arista n.sp., N. borealis n.sp., N. elobeyensis n.sp., N. intermedia n.sp., N. macroplatis n.sp., N. multiseta n.sp., N. nicoleae n.sp.), four new species of Namanereis (N. minuta n.sp., N. serratis n.sp., N. stocki n.sp., N.
    [Show full text]
  • Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera
    THE POLYCHAETE WORMS DEFINITIONS AND KEYS TO THE ORDERS, FAMILIES AND GENERA THE POLYCHAETE WORMS Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera By Kristian Fauchald NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY In Conjunction With THE ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Science Series 28 February 3, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHARACTERS USED TO DEFINE HIGHER TAXA 2 CLASSIFICATION OF POLYCHAETES 7 ORDERS OF POLYCHAETES 9 KEY TO FAMILIES 9 ORDER ORBINIIDA 14 ORDER CTENODRILIDA 19 ORDER PSAMMODRILIDA 20 ORDER COSSURIDA 21 ORDER SPIONIDA 21 ORDER CAPITELLIDA 31 ORDER OPHELIIDA 41 ORDER PHYLLODOCIDA 45 ORDER AMPHINOMIDA 100 ORDER SPINTHERIDA 103 ORDER EUNICIDA 104 ORDER STERNASPIDA 114 ORDER OWENIIDA 114 ORDER FLABELLIGERIDA 115 ORDER FAUVELIOPSIDA 117 ORDER TEREBELLIDA 118 ORDER SABELLIDA 135 FIVE "ARCHIANNELIDAN" FAMILIES 152 GLOSSARY 156 LITERATURE CITED 161 INDEX 180 Preface THE STUDY of polychaetes used to be a leisurely I apologize to my fellow polychaete workers for occupation, practised calmly and slowly, and introducing a complex superstructure in a group which the presence of these worms hardly ever pene- so far has been remarkably innocent of such frills. A trated the consciousness of any but the small group great number of very sound partial schemes have been of invertebrate zoologists and phylogenetlcists inter- suggested from time to time. These have been only ested in annulated creatures. This is hardly the case partially considered. The discussion is complex enough any longer. without the inclusion of speculations as to how each Studies of marine benthos have demonstrated that author would have completed his or her scheme, pro- these animals may be wholly dominant both in num- vided that he or she had had the evidence and inclina- bers of species and in numbers of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cryptic Species of Neanthes (Annelida: Phyllodocida: Nereididae)
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2015 RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY Supplement No. 31: 75–95 Date of publication: 10 July 2015 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A039A3A6-C05B-4F36-8D7F-D295FA236C6B A new cryptic species of Neanthes (Annelida: Phyllodocida: Nereididae) from Singapore confused with Neanthes glandicincta Southern, 1921 and Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis (Monro, 1937) Yen-Ling Lee1* & Christopher J. Glasby2 Abstract. A new cryptic species of Neanthes (Nereididae), N. wilsonchani, new species, is described from intertidal mudflats of eastern Singapore. The new species was confused with both Ceratonereis (Composetia) burmensis (Monro, 1937) and Neanthes glandicincta Southern, 1921, which were found to be conspecific with the latter name having priority. Neanthes glandicincta is newly recorded from Singapore, its reproductive forms (epitokes) are redescribed, and Singapore specimens are compared with topotype material from India. The new species can be distinguished from N. glandicincta by slight body colour differences and by having fewer pharyngeal paragnaths in Areas II (4–8 vs 7–21), III (11–28 vs 30–63) and IV (1–9 vs 7–20), and in the total number of paragnaths for all Areas (16–41 vs 70–113). No significant differences were found in the morphology of the epitokes between the two species. The two species have largely non-overlapping distributions in Singapore; the new species is restricted to Pleistocene coastal alluvium in eastern Singapore, while N. glandicinta occurs in western Singapore as well as in Malaysia and westward to India. Key words. polychaete, new species, taxonomy, ragworm INTRODUCTION Both species are atypical members of their respective nominative genera: N.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Nereididae Marine Sediment Monitoring
    Family Nereididae Marine Sediment Monitoring Puget Sound Polychaetes: Nereididae Family Nereididae Family-level characters (from Hilbig, 1994) Prostomium piriform (pear-shaped) or rounded, bearing 2 antennae, two biarticulate palps, and 2 pairs of eyes. Eversible pharynx with 2 sections, the proximal oral ring and the distal maxillary ring which possesses 2 fang-shaped, often serrated terminal jaws; both the oral and maxillary rings may bear groups of papillae or hardened paragnaths of various sizes, numbers, and distribution patterns. Peristomium without parapodia, with 4 pairs of tentacular cirri. Parapodia uniramous in the first 2 setigers and biramous thereafter; parapodia possess several ligules (strap-like lobes) and both a dorsal cirrus and ventral cirrus. Shape, size, location of ligules is distinctive. They are more developed posteriorly, so often need to see ones from median to posterior setigers. Setae generally compound in both noto- and neuropodia; some genera have simple falcigers (blunt-tipped setae)(e.g., Hediste and Platynereis); completely lacking simple capillary setae. Genus and species-level characters The kind and the distribution of the setae distinguish the genera and species. The number and distribution of paragnaths on the pharynx. Unique terminology for this family Setae (see Hilbig, 1994, page 294, for pictures of setae) o Homogomph – two prongs of even length where the two articles of the compound setae connect. o Heterogomph – two prongs of uneven length where the two articles of the compound setae connect. o Spinigers - long articles in the compound setae. o Falcigers – short articles in the compound setae. o So, there can be homogomph falcigers and homogomph spinigers, and heterogomph falcigers and heterogomph spinigers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download and Streaming), and Products (Analytics and Indexes)
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 53RD EUROPEAN MARINE BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM OOSTENDE, BELGIUM 17-21 SEPTEMBER 2018 This publication should be quoted as follows: Mees, J.; Seys, J. (Eds.) (2018). Book of abstracts – 53rd European Marine Biology Symposium. Oostende, Belgium, 17-21 September 2018. VLIZ Special Publication, 82. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee - Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ): Oostende. 199 pp. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ) – Flanders Marine Institute InnovOcean site, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Oostende, Belgium Tel. +32-(0)59-34 21 30 – Fax +32-(0)59-34 21 31 E-mail: [email protected] – Website: http://www.vliz.be The abstracts in this book are published on the basis of the information submitted by the respective authors. The publisher and editors cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this book of abstracts. Reproduction is authorized, provided that appropriate mention is made of the source. ISSN 1377-0950 Table of Contents Keynote presentations Engelhard Georg - Science from a historical perspective: 175 years of change in the North Sea ............ 11 Pirlet Ruth - The history of marine science in Belgium ............................................................................... 12 Lindeboom Han - Title of the keynote presentation ................................................................................... 13 Obst Matthias - Title of the keynote presentation ...................................................................................... 14 Delaney Jane - Title
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Nicon Kinberg, 1866 (Polychaeta, Nereididae) from Ecuador, Eastern Pacific, with a Key to All Known Species of the Genus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 269: 67–76A new (2013) species of Nicon Kinberg, 1866 (Polychaeta, Nereididae) from Ecuador... 67 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.269.4003 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new species of Nicon Kinberg, 1866 (Polychaeta, Nereididae) from Ecuador, Eastern Pacific, with a key to all known species of the genus Jesús Angel de León-González1,†, Berenice Trovant2,‡ 1 Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Ap. Postal 5, Suc. “F”, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, 66451, México 2 Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET), Boulevard Brown 2915, U9120ACF Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F347D71F-DDEA-4105-953F-4FE71A5D6809 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C9AB5469-9F6E-4F75-9C00-A3C919119900 Corresponding author: Jesús Angel de León-González ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Glasby | Received 18 September 2012 | Accepted 14 January 2013 | Published 18 February 2013 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB15484A-C844-4325-A969-65E4884EDD02 Citation: de León-González JA, Trovant B (2013) A new species of Nicon Kinberg, 1866 (Polychaeta, Nereididae) from Ecuador, Eastern Pacific, with a key to all known species of the genus. ZooKeys 269: 67–76. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.269.4003 Abstract A new species of Nicon Kinberg, 1866 from the east Pacific coast of Ecuador is described. The new species is characterized by a long, thin dorsal ligule on median and posterior parapodia and infracicular sesquig- omph falcigers in the neuropodia. A key to all species of Nicon is provided. Keywords Annelida, polychaetes, Nereididae, intertidal, Ecuador, taxonomy, systematics Copyright J.A.
    [Show full text]