University of Nevada, Reno Trace Element Distribution in Chalcopyrite

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Nevada, Reno Trace Element Distribution in Chalcopyrite University of Nevada, Reno Trace Element Distribution in Chalcopyrite-Bearing Porphyry and Skarn Deposits A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Reid I. Yano Dr. Tommy B. Thompson/ Thesis Advisor August, 2012 Copyright by Reid I. Yano 2012 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by REID I. YANO entitled Trace Element Distribution In Chalcopyrite-Bearing Porphyry And Skarn Deposits be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Tommy Thompson, Ph.D., Advisor Jonathan Price, Ph.D., Committee Member Thom Seal, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School August, 2012 i Abstract In today’s environment, large investments are being made to develop new, green energy sources. These technologies include wind turbines, solar panels, geothermal plants, and many others. Many of these new technologies are created or enhanced with the use of relatively uncommon elements. For example, rare earth element-bearing magnets are used in wind turbines and cadmium-tellurium films are used in the production of photovoltaic cells. Other applications of uncommon elements include catalytic converters, car batteries in hybrid vehicles, and high temperature superconductors. The distribution of uncommon elements is geographically uneven. For example, in 2009, 97% of the world’s rare earth production came from China. This makes the rare earths critical elements from a U.S. perspective – elements that are subject to supply disruptions because they are dependent on only one or a few countries. Domestic sources of rare earth and other critical elements should be developed in order to lessen our dependency on foreign export. Much work has been done analyzing gold deposits for trace element association, but little work exists that examines trace elements in copper deposits. The focus of this project is to determine which, if any, trace elements occur within chalcopyrite-bearing deposits, if certain types of copper deposits are more enriched in trace elements than other types, which copper minerals host the trace elements, and if there is any geographical variation in trace elements within the same type of deposit. This project focuses on chalcopyrite-bearing porphyries and skarns due to the widespread nature of the mineral in these deposit types. The key trace elements of interest include tellurium, selenium, gallium, and indium, all of which have potential applications in solar panels. Over the course of this project an analytical error by a commercial laboratory was discovered. The initial geochemical data by ICP-OES determined by the commercial laboratory indicated an anomalously high concentration of tellurium. Iron-tellurium binary plots indicated a near-perfect positive correlation, implying interference. Follow- up analyses by the Denver-based USGS office utilizing an array of analytical techniques (ICP-MS, LA-ICP-MS) failed to reproduce the reported tellurium values. The data indicate that in the presence of high iron there is an iron interference with tellurium when analyzed using ICP-OES. Tellurium occurs as micron-sized inclusions associated with Ag-Bi-Au-Pb and typically hosted within chalcopyrite over other sulfides. Both porphyry and skarn deposits show erratic values, with no discernible preference in type of deposit. Selenium occurs presumably as a lattice substitution into the sulfur site of all sulfide phases but generally is preferentially enriched in chalcopyrite. Other sulfide phases as well as secondary copper phases do show selenium enrichment, but selenium in these phases typically is lower and more erratic than in chalcopyrite. The Yerington and Bingham porphyry deposits report the highest selenium values, with lower values from Grasberg, and none above the detection limit reported from Chuquicamata. Gallium was not identified in sulfide phases in any of the deposits, instead occurring as a lattice substitution into the iron site of magnetite. Indium shows a preferential enrichment in ii skarn deposits over porphyries. Indium values generally follow silver values, and both are more elevated and more consistent in chalcopyrite from skarns versus porphyry deposits. The Pumpkin Hollow deposit, Lyon County, Nevada, is a series of blind IOCG/skarn deposits genetically related to the emplacement of the Jurassic Yerington batholith. The primary host rocks in the region are the Triassic Mason Valley limestones and the Triassic Gardnerville Formation argillites, limestones, and shales. The sulfide mineralogy observed at Pumpkin Hollow consists of chalcopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, and minor sphalerite, each with an associated trace element suite. The tellurium occurs as separate microscopic mineral inclusions within the chalcopyrite, the selenium as a substitution into all of the sulfides,; the gallium as a substitution into magnetite, and the indium as a substitution in the chalcopyrite. iii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the tireless support and guidance of Dr. Jonathan Price. I am also deeply indebted to Dr. Tommy Thompson for his guidance through the course of my graduate career. Furthermore, this project would not have been completed if not for the support and assistance of Poul Emsbo, Alan Koenig, and the other USGS staff; Hank Ohlin and Greg French of Nevada Copper for allowing me unrestricted access to samples and geochemical data and providing housing during my field work in Yerington; Terri Garside (formerly) of the NBMG, and the UNR College of Sciences for funding my thesis. I would also like to thank my classmates both within the CREG program and the geology department as a whole. I also want to thank my parents for instilling in me a love for the outdoors at an early age, and my brother and sister for always being there. Finally, this paper is dedicated to Brigid Doran, without whom I would not have made it to or through grad school. Thank you for believing in me. iv Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Focus of Project . 3 Trace Elements . 8 Tellurium . 9 Selenium . 10 Gallium . 11 Indium . 12 Analytical Discrepancies . 14 Distribution of Trace Elements . 17 Bingham Canyon, Utah, USA . 18 Chuquicamata, Antofagasta Province, Chile . 20 Yerington, Nevada, USA . 22 Grasberg, Irian Jaya, Indonesia . 24 Cananea District, Sonora, Mexico . 27 Republic, Arizona, USA . 31 Outokumpu, Finland . 33 Case Study – Pumpkin Hollow . 35 Regional Geology . 36 Deposit Geology . 37 Sulfide Mineralogy . 39 Trace Element Package . 44 Comparison . 46 Conclusions . 50 v Reference . 55 Appendix . 57 vi List of Tables Table 1: Global production of critical elements in 2009 . 6 Table 2: Summary of trace elements from spot analyses . 48 Table 3: Summary of trace elements from bulk rock analyses . 48 vii List of Figures Figure 1: Crustal abundance versus price . 5 Figure 2: Periodic table with critical elements . 13 Figure 3: Comparison plots of tellurium versus iron . 16 Figure 4: Comparison of element composition by analytical technique . 16 Figure 5: Pumpkin Hollow deposit map . 38 Figure 6: Chalcopyrite photomicrographs . 41 Figure 7: Pyrite photomicrographs . 43 Figure 8: Magnetite photomicrograph and SEM image . 44 Figure 9: SEM images of inclusions . 45 Figure 10: Selenium frequency plots by phase . 52 Figure 11: Bulk rock binary plots of bismuth versus tellurium . 52 1 Introduction In today’s political environment, the mining industry has become an international business. As new technologies are developed and produced, more and more resources are necessary to maintain a steady supply. One of the fastest-growing industries is in the field of green energy, due in no small part to the recent push throughout much of the world to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Many of these new green energy sources (such as solar, wind, and geothermal) require a large amount of resources that historically had little use or demand. Due to the lack of historical use, relatively little is known about occurrence or distribution of such elements as opposed to the base or precious metals. This project came about as a result of the increasing demand for such elements, and the need for a better understanding of how these particular elements are distributed within copper systems. The University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) is fortunate to possess the Mackay-Stanford Ore Deposits Collection, donated to UNR by Stanford University after the closure of Stanford’s economic geology program. This collection provides an excellent opportunity to study a wide number of deposits from across the world, including many classic deposits that were studied by Stanford professors and students over the last 150 years. Utilizing this collection, as well as other ore samples collected by myself and Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering colleagues, splits were taken from larger specimens (preserving a specimen in the collection for future examination and analysis) and analyzed by colleagues at the USGS Denver office to determine, primarily using their newly developed laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) technique (Wilson et al., 2002), what trace elements are present and in which mineral they reside. A field study, involving sampling of core from the Pumpkin Hollow IOCG/skarn deposit, provides an excellent comparison to skarn and porphyry-copper 2 samples selected from the Mackay-Stanford collection. Finally, comparisons of trace elements are being made to determine which deposit types preferentially host which trace elements, and if there are variations within deposit types. 3 Focus of Project This project is part of a joint effort between the USGS, the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and various other academic and government agencies. The overall goal of this project is to identify trace element distributions in various ore deposits in order to lower the United States’ dependence on foreign import of critical elements. The elements of interest are those which are rare in the earth’s crust, are vital in the development of both green energy sources and military applications, and are at risk of restricted supply.
Recommended publications
  • Fundamental Flotation Behaviors of Chalcopyrite and Galena Using O-Isopropyl-N-Ethyl Thionocarbamate As a Collector
    minerals Article Fundamental Flotation Behaviors of Chalcopyrite and Galena Using O-Isopropyl-N-Ethyl Thionocarbamate as a Collector Yongjie Bu ID , Yuehua Hu *, Wei Sun *, Zhiyong Gao ID and Runqing Liu School of Mineral Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; [email protected] (Y.B.); [email protected] (Z.G.); [email protected] (R.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (W.S.); Tel.: +86-731-8830-482 (Y.H.); +86-0731-8883-6873 (W.S.) Received: 31 January 2018; Accepted: 12 March 2018; Published: 13 March 2018 Abstract: Copper and lead are two important and widely used metals in industry. Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) is associated with galena (PbS) in ore, and it has been a research hotspot in separating galena from chalcopyrite by flotation. In this study, the flotation behaviors of chalcopyrite and galena were studied through flotation tests, adsorption measurements, solution chemistry calculation, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The results show that the floatability of chalcopyrite is better than that of galena in the presence of O-isopropyl-N-ethyl thionocarbamate (IPETC), and the recovery difference between chalcopyrite and galena is about 20% when IPETC is 7 × 10−4 mol/L at pH 9.5, while the floatability difference between the two minerals is significant. Competitive adsorption of OH− and IPETC on mineral surfaces leads to lower floatability of galena than that of chalcopyrite. IPETC is able to remove the hydration layer on mineral surfaces and then adsorb on active sites. The floatability of minerals is enhanced with the increase of their hydrophobicity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Column Leaching Model of Low-Grade Chalcopyrite Ore: Mineral Preferences and Chemical Reactivity
    minerals Article A Column Leaching Model of Low-Grade Chalcopyrite Ore: Mineral Preferences and Chemical Reactivity Heike Bostelmann and Gordon Southam * School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-07-3365-8505 Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 8 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: Bioleaching models to examine copper extraction from low-grade chalcopyrite ores were set up to identify the influence of pyrite on leaching efficacy. A combination of scanning electron microscopy and geochemical analysis showed that extraction was marginally enhanced by the addition of pyrite when using a combination of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, an iron oxidiser, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, a sulphur oxidising species and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, an iron and sulphur oxidiser. Extensive biofilms formed on the pyrite surfaces (>106 cells/mm2) but were severely limited on chalcopyrite, possessing approximately the same number of cells as quartz grains, an internal non-nutrient control “substrate” (with ca. 2 103 cells/mm2). The presence of dissolved copper did × not inhibit the growth of this consortium. Indirect “bioleaching” of chalcopyrite appears to be limited by proton activity at the chalcopyrite surface. Keywords: bioleaching; chalcopyrite; pyrite; low-grade ore 1. Introduction Economic processing of chalcopyrite ores through bioleaching, i.e., the mobilisation of metals from ore by microorganisms, has not been as successful as secondary copper sulphide leaching operations [1]. This chalcopyrite “problem” needs to be solved, as it is the dominant copper mineral in many low-grade copper deposits. This has resulted in large quantities of low-grade waste material being stockpiled or discarded in mining operations, as they are not economic to process, though they do contain massive quantities of metals (i.e., copper) simply due to their combined volume [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Electrical Resistivity of Galena, Pyrite, and Chalcopyrite
    American Mineralogist, Volume61, pages248-259, 1976 The electricalresistivity of galena,pyrite, and chalcopyrite Doneln F. PnlorrronreNn RnlpH T. Suurv Departmentof Geologyand Geophysics,Uniuersity of Utah Salt Lake Cily, Utah 84112 Abstract. The sulfidesgalena, chalcopyrite, and pyrite are semiconductorswhose electrical resistivity and type are controlled by deviationsfrom stoichiometryand impurity content,and henceby their geochemicalenvironment. We measuredelectrical resistivity,type, and the impurity content (emissionspectrograph and microprobe) on small volumesof sample.Our results, together with those obtained from a comprehensiveliterature analysis, are usedto construct histogramsof the natural variability in carrier density and resistivity. Sulfur deficiency is the dominant defect in chalcopyrite and hence almost all natural samplesare n-type. lt appearsthat the copper/iron ratio is also important electrically,the copper-richsamples being the more resistive. lmportant donor deiectsin galena(z-type samples)are antimony and bismuth impurities, and sulfur vacancies;acceptor defects(p-type samples) include silver impurities and lead 'Mississippi vacancies.P-type samplesappear to be restrictedto Valley' and argentiferous deposits. In pyrite, electricallyactive impurities include cobalt, nickel, and copper as donors, and arsenicas an acceptor.Deviations from stoichiometry,in the same senseas galena,may be important. Pyritesfrom sedimentaryand epithermaldeposits are usuallyp-type if cupriferous sulfidesare not present.Samples from hypothermaldeposits
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Separation of Chalcopyrite from Galena Using a Green Reagent Scheme
    minerals Article Selective Separation of Chalcopyrite from Galena Using a Green Reagent Scheme Kaile Zhao 1,2,3, Chao Ma 1,4, Guohua Gu 1,* and Zhiyong Gao 1,* 1 School of Minerals Processing and Bio-Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; [email protected] (K.Z.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Mineral Processing, Beijing 100162, China 3 Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China 4 Hunan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Changsha 410004, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (Z.G.) Abstract: The study of the depression effect of non-toxic depressants on the flotation separation of chalcopyrite from galena is of great importance for both industrial applications and theoretical research. The mixed depressant (DFinal) of four common inhibitors—sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium silicate, sodium sulfite, and zinc sulfate—exhibited high selectivity during the separation of chalcopyrite from galena. Flotation tests on an industrial copper–lead bulk concentrate showed that using this depressant mixture can achieve highly efficient separation of chalcopyrite from galena at the natural pH of the pulp. Copper and lead concentrates were produced at grades of 21.88% (Cu) and 75.53% (Pb), with recoveries of 89.07% (Cu) and 98.26% (Pb). This showed a similar performance of DFinal with dichromate, which is a depressant that is widely used in industry, but without the environmental risks or the need for pH control. Zeta potential and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) results showed that interaction between the surface of the chalcopyrite and the mixed depressant Citation: Zhao, K.; Ma, C.; Gu, G.; was prevented by pre-treatment with a composite thiophosphate collector (CSU11), while the mixed Gao, Z.
    [Show full text]
  • CHALCOPYRITE Visiting
    communication, 2000). The quarry is privately owned and permission must be obtained before CHALCOPYRITE visiting. 13. Groveland mine, near Felch. CuFeS2 Common as attractive microcrystals (DeMark, A widespread and common copper ore mineral 2000). occurring in veins, disseminations, or as replacement deposits. Northern Peninsula. Alpena County: 1. Lafarge Corporation, Great Lakes Region (formerly National Gypsum Company) quarry, Alpena: Rare, with calcite, dolomite, barite, sphalerite, marcasite, pyrite, and strontianite (Morris, 1983). 2. Paxton quarry, Paxton: With calcite, dolomite, quartz, sphalerite, pyrite, and marcasite (Morris, 1983). Baraga County: Ohio mines (Webster and Imperial mines), Imperial Heights near Michigamme: Associates are apatite, goethite, grunerite, graphite, palygorskite, carbonates, and Figure 56: A 1.3 mm chalcopyrite crystal on dolomite other sulfides (Morris, 1983; DeMark, 2000). from the Groveland mine, Dickinson County. Ramon Crystals on calcite rhombohedra. DeMark specimen, Dan Behnke photograph. Dickinson County: 1. Metronite quarry, 4 km east-northeast of Felch: In tremolite marble Gogebic County: 1. Eureka mine near Ramsay, (Randville Dolomite) along contact of aplite- sections 12 and 13, T47N, R46W: With pyrite and pegmatite dike and in marginal parts of the dike gold in quartz veins at contact between granite and itself (Heinrich, 1962b). 2. Rian’s quarry southeast the Palms slate (Dickey and Young, 1938). 2. of Felch: Similar occurrence (Pratt, 1954). 3. In Copp’s mine 10 km north of Marenisco: With iron formation of the Menominee iron range and galena, sphalerite, pyrite, and dolomite (Dana, also just north of Felch: Rare, usually associated 1892). 3. Roadside exposure on south side of with secondary pyrite (Pratt, 1954; Brower, 1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study at Lokop, Dairi, Latong, Tanjung Balit and Tuboh)
    INDONESIAN MINING JOURNAL Vol. 17, No. 3, October 2014 : 122 - 133 MINERALIZATION OF THE SELECTED BASE METAL DEPOSITS IN THE BARISAN RANGE, SUMATERA, INDONESIA (CASE STUDY AT LOKOP, DAIRI, LATONG, TANJUNG BALIT AND TUBOH) MINERALISASI CEBAKAN LOGAM DASAR TERPILIH DI BUKIT BARISAN, SUMATERA - INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS DI LOKOP, DAIRI, LATONG, TANJUNG BALIT DAN TUBOH) HAMDAN Z. ABIDIN and HARRY UTOYO Geological Survey Centre Jalan Diponegoro 57 Bandung, Indonesia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Three types of base metal occurrences discovered along the Barisan Range, Sumatera are skarn, sedex and hydrothermal styles. The skarn styles include Lokop, Latong and Tuboh, while Dairi and Tanjung Balit belong to sedex and hydrothermal deposits, respectively. The Lokop deposit is dominated by galena with minor pyrite and is hosted within interbedded meta-sandstone, slate, phyllite, hornfels and quartzite of the Kluet Forma- tion. The Skarn Latong deposit consists of galena with minor sphalerite and chalcopyrite with skarn minerals of magnetite, garnet and calcite. It is hosted within the meta-limestone of the Kuantan Formation. The Skarn Tuboh deposit is dominated by sphalerite with minor galena, pyrite, manganese, hematite and magnetite. It is hosted within interbedded meta-sandstone and meta-limestone of the Rawas Formation. The Dairi deposit belongs to the sedimentary exhalative (sedex) type. It is hosted within the sedimentary sequence of the Kluet Formation. Two ore types known are Julu and Jehe mineralization. The Julu mineralization referring to as sediment exhalative (sedex), was formed syngenetically with carbonaceous shale. Ore mineralogies consist of galena, sphalerite and pyrite. The deposit was formed within the temperature range of 236-375°C with salinity ranges from 9,3-23% wt.NaCl.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Oxidation of Chalcopyrite,Chalcocite, Galena
    PLEASE 00 Nor REMOVE FRCM LIBRARY Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations/1987 Analysis of the Oxidation of Chalcopyrite, Chalcocite, Galena, Pyrrhotite, Marcasite, and Arsenopyrite By G. W. Reimers and K. E. Hjelmstad UBRARY ""OKANERESEARC H CENTER .... RECEIVED OCT 021 1981 US BUREAU Of MINES t 315 MONTGOMBlY ",'IE. SPOICANl,. WI>. 99201 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Report of Investigations 9118 Analysis of the Oxidation of Chalcopyrite, Chalcocite, Galena!' Pyrrhotite, Marcasite, and Arsenopyrite By G. W. Reimers and K. E. Hjelmstad UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Donald Paul Hodel, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES David S. Brown, Acting Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data : Reimers, G. W. (George W.) Analysis of the oxidation of chalcopyrite, chalcocite, galena, pyr­ rhotite, marcasite, and arsenopyrite. (Bureau of Mines report of investigations; 9118) Bibliography: p. 16 . Supt. of Docs. no.: 128.23: 9118. 1. Pyrites. 2. Oxidation. I. Hjelmstad, Kenneth E. II . Title. III. Series: Reportofinvestiga­ tions (United States. Bureau of Mines) ; 9118. TN23.U43 [QE389.2] 622 s [622'.8] 87-600136 CONTENTS Abst 1 Introduction ••••••••• 2 Equipment and test • .,.,.,.,.,.,., .•. .,., ..... .,.,.,.,., ... ., . ., ........ ., .... ., ..... ., .. ., . .,. 3 Samp Ie ., .. ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., .. ., .• ., .. ., ..... ., •.••• ., . ., ., ..•. ., ., ., . ., ., ., ., • ., ., ., ., • 4 Results and discussion .. ., . .,.,.,. ........ .,., ...... ., ., .... " . ., . .,.,., . .,., . .,., ,.,.., ., . .,
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
    Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee,
    [Show full text]
  • Chalcopyrite Cufes2 C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Chalcopyrite CuFeS2 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Tetragonal. Point Group: 42m. Equant, tetrahedral-shaped crystals, may be modified by scalenohedral faces, to as large as 10 cm. Sphenoidal faces {112} typically large, dull in luster and striated k [110]; {112} faces are small and bright. Commonly massive, compact; can be botryoidal. Twinning: Twin plane {112}, composition surface commonly {112}; twin plane {012}; also by rotation about [001] with composition plane {110}, producing penetration twins. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Poor on {011} and {111}. Hardness = 3.5–4 VHN = 187–203 (basal section); 181–192 (vertical section) (100 g load). D(meas.) = 4.1–4.3 D(calc.) = 4.283 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Brass-yellow, may be tarnished and iridescent. Streak: Greenish black. Luster: Metallic. Anisotropism: Weak. R1–R2: (400) 16.0–17.3, (420) 20.0–21.3, (440) 24.8–26.1, (460) 30.2–31.4, (480) 34.9–35.9, (500) 38.9–39.9, (520) 41.9–42.7, (540) 44.0–44.9, (560) 45.4–46.4, (580) 46.6–47.6, (600) 47.1–48.3, (620) 47.5–4.86, (640) 47.6–48.7, (660) 47.6–48.7, (680) 47.6–48.6, (700) 47.6–48.6 Cell Data: Space Group: I42d. a = 5.281 c = 10.401 Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Merkur mine, Ems, Hesse, Germany. 3.038 (100), 1.8570 (35), 1.5927 (27), 1.8697 (22), 1.5753 (14), 2.644 (5), 1.2025 (5) Chemistry: (1) (2) Cu 35.03 34.63 Fe 31.00 30.43 S 34.96 34.94 Total 100.99 100.00 (1) Western mines, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada; by electron microprobe, leading to Cu1.01Fe1.01S2.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of in and Other Rare Metals in Cassiterite and Associated Minerals in Sn ± W Ore Deposits of the Western Variscan Belt
    Eur. J. Mineral. 2017, 29, 739–753 Special issue dedicated to Published online 26 June 2017 Zdeněk Johan Distribution of In and other rare metals in cassiterite and associated minerals in Sn ± W ore deposits of the western Variscan Belt 1,* 1,2 1,2 1 CATHERINE LEROUGE ,ERIC GLOAGUEN ,GUILLAUME WILLE and LAURENT BAILLY 1 BRGM, 3 Avenue Claude Guillemin, 45060 Orléans, France *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 2 ISTO, UMR 7327 - CNRS/Université d’Orléans, 1A rue de la Férollerie, 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France Abstract: We present data available on rare metal and indium distributions in cassiterite and associated minerals from thirteen Sn ± W granite-related ore deposits in the western Variscan Belt (Massif Central and Armorican Massif, France; Galicia, Spain; and SW England). Cassiterite and associated minerals including sulfides and titanium oxides were analysed using an electron probe micro- analyzer (EPMA). Significant indium contents were only measured in cassiterite from hydrothermal vein-type mineralizations associated with peraluminous granites of Montbelleux, Abbaretz (French Armorican Massif) and Marcofán (Galicia); they correlate with the highest Nb, Ta and Fe substitutions. Two coupled substitutions are proposed: (1) 2 (Sn4þ,Ti4þ) ↔ (Fe3þ,In3þ) þ (Nb5þ, Ta5þ) and (2) Fe2þ þ (Nb, Ta)5þ ↔ In3þ þ (Ti, Sn)4þ depending on Fe valence state. Sulfides (stannite, chalcopyrite, pyrite, arsenopyrite and sphalerite) and rutile associated with cassiterite contain significant amounts of indium, even when cassiterite is indium-free, suggesting preferential partitioning into the sulfides. Key-words: cassiterite; tin; indium; tungsten; ore deposit; trace element; sulfides; mineral chemistry. 1. Introduction et al., 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Petrography and Geochemistry of the Mesoarchean Bikoula Banded Iron Formation In
    1 Petrography and geochemistry of the Mesoarchean Bikoula banded iron formation in 2 the Ntem complex (Congo craton), Southern Cameroon: Implications for its origin 3 4 Tessontsap Teutsonga,b,*, Tomaso R.R. Bontognalib, Paul-Désiré Ndjiguia, Johannes C. 5 Vrijmoedb, Damon Teaglec, Matthew Cooperc, Derek Vanceb 6 a Department of Earth Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon 7 b Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 8 c Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of 9 Southampton, United Kingdom 10 *Corresponding author: [email protected] / [email protected] 11 12 Abstract 13 Precambrian banded iron formations (BIFs) represent an important source of mineable 14 iron, as well as an archive recording secular changes in the chemistry of the Earth’s early 15 oceans. Here we report petrographic and geochemical characteristics of unweathered drill core 16 samples from the Bikoula BIF, a virtually uncharacterized oxide facies iron formation, hosted 17 in the Mesoarchean Ntem complex, southern Cameroon. The BIF is cross-cut with syenitic 18 veins. The entire succession is highly deformed and metamorphosed under granulite facies 19 conditions. The BIF is characterized by alternating micro-bands of magnetite, quartz and 20 pyroxene. Sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite), oligoclase, ferro-pargasite, biotite and 21 ilmenite occur as minor phases. The presence of pyroxene, ferro-pargasite and oligoclase, 22 relatively high contents of major elements such as Al2O3 (0.76 – 7.52 wt.%), CaO (1.95 – 4.90 1 23 wt.%), MgO (3.78 – 5.59 wt.%), as well as positive correlations among Al2O3, TiO2, HFSEs, 24 LILEs and transition metals (V, Cr, Ni, Cu and Zn), suggest that the BIF protolith included a 25 significant amount of clastic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits
    Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits Open-File Report 2008–1321 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits By Byron R. Berger, Robert A. Ayuso, Jeffrey C. Wynn, and Robert R. Seal Open-File Report 2008–1321 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Berger, B.R., Ayuso, R.A., Wynn, J.C., and Seal, R.R., 2008, Preliminary model of porphyry copper deposits: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1321, 55 p. iii Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Regional Environment ...................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]