Inventing the Steadicam®

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inventing the Steadicam® Inventing the Steadicam® Part 1: Code Name “Pole” by Garrett Brown excerpted from his forthcoming book PHOTOS AND ILLUSTRATIONS COURTESY OF GARRETT BROWN Garrett Brown on the set of Bound for Glory. 26 CAMERA OPERATOR: STEADICAM / GARRETT BROWN Introduction could inspect the thoroughbreds. Garrett Brown had been working on a prototype of what John said, “Do you have a version in 16mm?” would become the Steadicam®. He formed The Moving & I said, “Of course.” Talking Picture Company of Philadelphia, New York and It was July 14th. We had three weeks. Gradyville, with good friend Warren Paul as the company’s producer and sales rep in the New York office. I had already tried hanging my Eclair on the iron pole but it Garrett explains: “‘The Pole’ became our code name for the was heavy and much too flexible—the camera visibly whipped whole project. My first experimental version had been cobbled around as I walked. I met Warren in Manhattan the next day out of plumbing pipe and lead ingots, as a simple pole with a to go to Canal Street, home of New York’s remaining WWII weighted t-bar at the back. The camera was bolted to the front surplus stores, where bargain-lots of just about every human and I held it at the center-of-balance and ran around the artifact were still to be found. Warren had remembered seeing Pennsylvania backwoods, recording the results on an Akai 1⁄4˝ racks of rectangular aluminum box-beams in all sizes, thin- reel-to-reel video recorder.” walled and light, but immensely rigid. How the Pole became the Steadicam involved many changes We drove downtown and parked his old Volvo and within a and many people. These three excerpts from Garrett’s book half hour had bought several eight-foot lengths of rectangular chronicle some of the nail-biting events in the process. Note some one-inch by two-inch extrusion. We set a piece between the of the other comical names they used to conceal it! curb and the street, and Warren stood on it to prove that it was strong. Back in Gradyville, Carl Ewing helped me square off the ends and make an impressively stiff and shiny T-bar rig with a handle that could lock at the balance point between the camera in front and vertical section in back where our new Kenyon gyro replaced the weights. John Wilcox didn’t intend to record Robyn’s dialogue, so he wouldn’t care if my rig sang with the gyro’s high- pitched duet of beating tones. Carl also helped me mount the five-foot fiber optic bundle from Dr. Siegmund so its lens could peer through the eyepiece of my camera, and we attached the view- ing end to the headband. The result wasn’t miraculous. Because the 16mm image had to squeeze through an 8mm bundle, it was exceedingly dim and the real world was comparatively, painfully brilliant. Only if I squinted the other eye like Long John Silver, could the viewfinding eye see what I was shoot- ing! At the last minute, I cut a hole through one lens of a pair of dense sunglasses, threaded the Garrett with the “handheld crane” prototype. bundle through the opening, and committed my fortunes to that notoriously absent-minded From Chapter 8, “New York” guardian angel of inventors (and fools). It was clear to Warren and me that ordinary unconfident On August 8, 1972 I stood on my opening mark outside the mortals might not be good prospects for something as radical weighing room door, holding the handle of my newly built, as the Pole, but a month later we suddenly got a customer. complicated-looking rig, whose mysterious bulges—cardboard John Wilcox was a genuine hotshot. He was hired to direct a boxes draped with black velour—concealed the fact that under- segment for ABC’s Monday Night Sports Special about Robyn neath it was still a pole. The camera was in front, the disguised Smith, the celebrated and beautiful female jockey who would gyro sang its intriguing song in back, the black garter snake become Fred Astaire’s youthful bride. Wilcox had heard about viewer writhed up and through the hole in my shades. I felt my invention from his cameraman, Urs Ferrar, who owned an like the cyborg from a cheesy science fiction film, but Robyn equipment rental house in New York. Urs and John watched Smith was oblivious—she had in mind only the impending my little video demo and hired me on the spot. They had race and her fierce competition with the male jockeys. been scratching their heads over a sequence that was a perfect Wilcox called ‘roll camera’ and on ‘action’ the door flew opportunity for my mysterious rig. Wilcox wanted a single, open and Robyn came striding out, brilliant in her silks and long, uncut tracking shot preceding Robyn as she walked the walking fast. I backpedaled frantically, the miniature flickering 200 yard flagstone path from the ‘weighing room’ at the figure in my right eye looming into a head-and-shoulders shot Saratoga Springs racecourse to the paddock where the crowd as I lost my way through the over-bright monocular world in 28 CAMERA OPERATOR: STEADICAM / GARRETT BROWN my other eye. My assistant unhelpfully whispered “No!” as I backed up the wrong path, and Smith, ignoring me, contin- ued on her way to the paddock For 50 fran- tic yards, I carried her in an increasingly dis- tant profile twisting my head around to see how I might get back near her; finally lurch- ing across a flower bed, blindly lifting my legs like a stork as she entered the paddock. I held the ‘pole’ up as high as possible, shooting between the top two rails as she mounted her horse and jogging alongside as she circled the enclosure. There was only one take. John Wilcox was a veteran, not given to Early sketches and notes, some nearly indecipherable now, show the genesis of the “crane” version. conversational flour- ishes. He said, “Have we got any usable pieces? I said “Yes.” His gadget and mine shared one irritating characteristic—if I drove home in a cloud of exhaustion and unhappiness. The you tilt up a camera-on-a-stick, it also rises in the air—but still, protruding fiber bundle had jerked the eyepiece and caused where was it? Why wasn’t it being used and why hadn’t Howard the image to swim in and out of view, so I was quite unsure of become famous and rich? the results. Urs Ferrar had been kind, but the other cameramen I dragged out dozens of my sketches from the early days of gazed upon me as if I was from Mars. the Pole concept and spread them out on the floor and repeat- A couple of weeks later I called John and asked how the shot edly studied them over a long weekend retreat in a motel. had turned out. He laconically said ‘fine’ but I missed seeing it Some were bizarre—dawn’s earliest alpha-wave glimmers. on the air and didn’t have the nerve to ask for a videotape. Others might actually have worked, but were too weird to be Wilcox recently told me he used the entire shot from begin- carried onto a film set. ning to end in the broadcast; and his boss at the time, the late The most detailed and practical drawing of all showed a great Roone Arledge, pronounced it to be sensational!—the parallelogram arrangement of pipe—like a miniature hand- look, the ‘ballsy’ operating choices, the diverging and rejoining, held crane—that would preserve the stability of the pole but the changing sizes! keep the camera level when it boomed up and down! I never knew. Roone was a hero of mine and his reaction I distinctly recalled the euphoria that accompanied finishing would have helped my morale, but it was already clear that this drawing. I stared and stared at it and began to exult all even with the black cloth and phony lumps and bumps, no over again. [See illustration above.] It was complicated! It was simple T-bar was likely to stand the movie business on its ear. probably patentable! It would do the wonderful Pole-type My attorney, J Donald McCarthy, had given me a sheaf of inertial trick, but the lens could be at any height from floor to ‘Agreements-of-Secrecy,’ and I had awkwardly insisted that ceiling, booming smoothly up and down while I strolled John have his entire crew sign them, even though the object effortlessly along, with the quintessential ‘look’ on my face, itself remained hidden under black cloth, but I couldn’t con- peering through my new big fiber-optic bundle at the bright ceal the thing forever! Worst of all, Howard K Dearborn had and perfect image! come to light in my patent search, and his vaguely similar My weary present-day eye looks at this sketch and sees its (and equally primitive) contraption, circa 1960, would have obvious flaws. My too-eager 1972 eye was dazzled, shot rendered the simple Pole unpatentable. through with the same moonbeams that have lured inventors I specifically remember being puzzled, even alarmed, that on, ever since a hirsute ancestor tried holding the arrow and Howard Dearborn’s device had apparently not been successful. releasing the bow! I knew that this baby would be a success. I CAMERA OPERATOR: STEADICAM / GARRETT BROWN 29 30 CAMERA OPERATOR: STEADICAM / GARRETT BROWN knew that the Hand-held Crane would revolutionize the movies and get an Oscar, and I fell asleep at the table with my head resting on my wonderful drawing.
Recommended publications
  • March 30, 2010 (XX:11) Stanley Kubrick, the SHINING (1980, 146 Min)
    March 30, 2010 (XX:11) Stanley Kubrick, THE SHINING (1980, 146 min) Directed by Jules Dassin Directed by Stanley Kubrick Based on the novel by Stephen King Original Music by Wendy Carlos and Rachel Elkind Cinematography by John Alcott Steadycam operator…Garrett Brown Jack Nicholson...Jack Torrance Shelley Duvall...Wendy Torrance Danny Lloyd...Danny Torrance Scatman Crothers...Dick Hallorann Barry Nelson...Stuart Ullman Joe Turkel...Lloyd the Bartender Lia Beldam…young woman in bath Billie Gibson…old woman in bath Anne Jackson…doctor STANLEY KUBRICK (26 July 1928, New York City, New York, USA—7 March 1999, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, England, UK, natural causes) directed 16, wrote 12, produced 11 and shot 5 films: Eyes Wide Shut (1999), Full Metal Jacket (1987), The Shining Lyndon (1976); Nominated Oscar: Best Writing, Screenplay Based (1980), Barry Lyndon (1975), A Clockwork Orange (1971), 2001: A on Material from Another Medium- Full Metal Jacket (1988). Space Odyssey (1968), Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964), Lolita (1962), Spartacus STEPHEN KING (21 September 1947, Portland, Maine) is a hugely (1960), Paths of Glory (1957), The Killing (1956), Killer's Kiss prolific writer of fiction. Some of his books are Salem's Lot (1974), (1955), The Seafarers (1953), Fear and Desire (1953), Day of the Black House (2001), Carrie (1974), Christine (1983), The Dark Fight (1951), Flying Padre: An RKO-Pathe Screenliner (1951). Half (1989), The Dark Tower (2003), Dark Tower: The Song of Won Oscar: Best Effects, Special Visual Effects- 2001: A Space Susannah (2003), The Dark Tower: The Drawing of the Three Odyssey (1969); Nominated Oscar: Best Writing, Screenplay Based (2003), The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger (2003), The Dark Tower: on Material from Another Medium- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ACADEMY MUSEUM of MOTION PICTURES Collection Highlights
    ACADEMY MUSEUM OF MOTION PICTURES Collection Highlights OVERVIEW The Academy Museum will draw from the unparalleled collection of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, which contains a vast range of motion picture production and history-related objects and technology, works on paper, still and moving images covering the history of motion picture in the United States and throughout the world. The collections include more than 12 million photographs, 190,000 film and video assets, 80,000 screenplays, 61,000 posters, and 104,000 pieces of production art. The collection also includes more than 1,600 special collections of film legends such as Cary Grant, Katharine Hepburn, Alfred Hitchcock, and John Huston. These special collections contain production files, personal correspondence, clippings, contracts, manuscripts, scrapbooks, storyboards, and more. The Academy’s collecting divisions work collaboratively to acquire, preserve, digitize, and exhibit the broad range of materials entrusted to their care by generations of filmmakers and collectors. The Academy Museum has actively been acquiring three-dimensional motion picture objects since 2008. Its holdings now number approximately 2,500 items representing motion picture technology, costume design, production design, makeup and hairstyling, promotional materials and memorabilia, and awards. MOTION PICTURE TECHNOLOGY The collection includes examples of pre-cinema devices, early and modern motion picture cameras and projectors, sound, editing and lighting equipment, and other landmark
    [Show full text]
  • How to Become a Steadicam Operator 74
    INTRODUCTION 6 DEFINITION 9 HISTORY 9 BACKGROUND 10 STEADICAM CONFIGURATION 12 HOW IT WORKS 13 THE STEADICAM WORKS IN THESE WAYS. 13 ISOLATION OF THE CAMERA 14 THE STEADICAM IS DESIGNED TO ISOLATE TWO ELEMENTS 14 ISOLATION OF THE SLED AND CAMERA 15 THE ARTICULATED ARM 15 SPREADING THE CAMERA'S MASS 17 HOW YOU CONTROL IT 17 CENTER OF GRAVITY 18 CENTER OF MASS 18 CONCLUSION. 18 WHAT STEADICAM IS GOOD AT 19 WHAT STEADICAM IS NOT GOOD AT: 21 EXAMPLES OF GOOD STEADICAM IN FEATURE FILMS 22 BALANCE 23 STATIC BALANCE 23 DYNAMIC BALANCE 25 STEADICAM ARMS 27 PRO ARM 29 DAVID EMMERICHS VIEWS ON THE PRO ARM 30 ARM CONCLUSION 31 THE MASTER SERIES ARM 32 GARRETT BROWNS COMMENTS ON THE NEW MASTER SERIES ISO-ELASTIC ARM 32 ARM MAINTENANCE 34 1 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS 34 SPRING TENSION 35 ADJUSTABLE ARMS. 35 MASTER SERIES ARM 35 PRO ARM 36 ANGLE OF LIFT 36 OLDER MODEL ARMS 36 STEADICAM ARM UPGRADE PATH 39 DIFFERENT STEADICAM MODELS 40 GENERAL 40 MODEL I 40 MODEL II 40 EFP 41 MODEL III AND IIIA 41 MASTER SERIES 41 PRO (PADDOCK RADICAL OPTIONS) SLED 42 SK 42 JR AND DV 42 THE DIFFERENT STEADICAM MODELS MADE BY CINEMA PRODUCTS 43 STEADICAM® MASTER FILM 45 MASTER FILM SPECIFICATIONS 45 MASTER ELITE SPECIFICATIONS 46 MASTER EDTV SPECIFICATIONS 48 MASTER BROADCAST SPECIFICATIONS 49 EFP SPECIFICATIONS 50 PROVID SPECIFICATIONS 51 VIDEO SK SPECIFICATIONS 52 GARRETT BROWNS COMMENTS ON THE MASTER SERIES 53 GEORGE PADDOCK INCORPORATED PADDOCK RADICAL OPTIONS 58 PRO 58 PRO SYSTEM 58 PRO ARM 60 DONKEY BOX 60 GIMBAL 61 5” DIAGONAL HIGH INTENSITY MONITOR II 61 POST 62 BATTERIES 62 BATTERY MODULE 63 PRO LITE 64 PRO GYRO MODULE 64 SUPERPOST 65 PRO PRICE LIST 66 2 SLED: 66 ARM 66 PRO MODULES 67 PRO VEST 67 CINEMA PRODUCTS MASTER SERIES VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse Nicolas Winding Refn, Parrain Du Festival
    Communiqué de presse À La Cinémathèque française La Fondation Jérôme Seydoux-Pathé / La Filmothèque / Le Reflet Médicis Christine 21 / Le Méliès à Montreuil / Le Louvre Nicolas Winding Refn, parrain du Festival Jerzy Skolimowski et Garrett Brown, invités d’honneur À travers un programme cinéphile et éclectique, cette manifestation rend hommage au travail des archives, des ayants droit, studios et laboratoires pour sauver les œuvres du passé. La programmation se composera à nouveau de plusieurs sections thématiques et donnera lieu à un intense programme de rencontres, ateliers et ciné-concerts. Dans le cadre du festival, de nombreuses projections seront accueillies par des cinémas parisiens ainsi qu’en régions, en partenariat avec l’ADRC et l’AFCAE. Nicolas Winding Refn, parrain du Festival En partenariat avec La Rabbia et La Maison du Danemark. De la trilogie danoise Pusher à Drive, Prix de la mise en scène au Festival de Cannes en 2011, et plus récemment The Neon Demon, Nicolas Winding Refn réinvente à chaque film une esthétique de la violence. Exigeant et percutant, son cinéma est devenu une référence pour toutes les générations de cinéphiles. À l’occasion du lancement de la version française de sa plateforme BYNWR.com, il présente une sélection de films de sa collection en version restaurée, ainsi qu’une série de « doubles programmes » alliant une de ses œuvres avec un film l’ayant inspiré. Masterclass, présentations de séances, dialogue avec Alejandro Jodorowsky, Nuit de cinéma… Jerzy Skolimowski, invité d’honneur En partenariat avec Malavida. Hommage suivi d’une rétrospective intégrale à La Cinémathèque française du 14 mars au 4 avril.
    [Show full text]
  • Edison Gibi Adam, Garrett Brown
    güncel Edison gibi adam, Garrett Brown Savaş Ferhat / [email protected] Merhaba, Geçenlerde usta görüntü yönetmeni arkadaşlarımla mesleki bir muhab- bet içindeyken “Sizce sinema - televizyon alanında en önemli buluşlar nelerdir? “ diye sordum. Benim cevabım kameranın icadından sonra renkli ve sesli film, elektronik kamera, CCD, video asist ve dijital görün- tü - ses teknolojisi derken bir arkadaşım atıldı ve “steadicam” dedi. Ha- liyle konu steadicam çevresinde dönmeye başladı. Yeni yeni gelişmekte Garrett Brown’un ilk steadicam prototipleri. olan gyro-gimbal rig ve dron teknolojisinin steadicam ve jimmy jib’in tahtına göz diktiği, hepimizin ortak görüşüydü. Kullanan operatörlerin dakikalık bir demo filmini çok sayıda yönetmene izletmiş. Bu süreçte kuşandıkları özel yelek dolayısıyla robocop gibi havalı görünmelerinin de Ed DiGiulio, Garrett Brown’nun çalışmalarından etkilenmiş ve onda etkisiyle, neredeyse mesleğe yeni başlayan tüm kameraman ve görüntü ticari bir potansiyel gören ilk kişi olmuş. O dönemin ene önemli sine- yönetmenlerinin kullanmayı hayal ettikleri bir sistemdir steadicam. ma ekipmanları üreticisi olan Cinema Products Corp.’un kurucusu olan DiGiulio, Brown’la anlaşarak tasarımlarını geliştirme ve tanıtma fırsatı Yaşayan efsane steadicam, görüntü yönetmeni - kameraman Garrett vermiş. Brown birçok prototipten sonra profesyonel anlamda ilk başarılı Brown’un insanlığa bir armağanı. Garrett Brown 70’li yılların başların- ürünü 1975’te ortaya çıkartabilmiş. Nihayet ilk kez 1976 yılında Bound dan itibaren hareketli çekimlerde kameradan sarsıntısız, titremesiz gö- for Glory filminde kullanabilmiş. Brown’ ın steadicam’li sahnelerinden et- rüntüler elde edebilmek için çalışmaya başlamış. Aslında işin düşünsel kilenen Sinema Sanatları ve Bilimleri Akademisi üyeleri, filmin görüntü altyapısı ve araştırmalara başlaması 1965’e uzanıyor. İlk çalışmalarında yönetmeni Haskell Wexler’a Oscar vermişler.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINE of INDEPENDENT CINEMA and the AMERICAN NEW WAVE
    TIMELINE OF INDEPENDENT CINEMA and the AMERICAN NEW WAVE PRECURSORS TO AMERICAN NEW WAVE 1954 Roger Coran directs The Monster From the Ocean Floor for independent producers James Nicholson and Samuel Arkoff, for $10,000. Starts a production relationship of low budget, quickly made films and independent distribution that continues until 1970 1956 American International Pictures formed in 1956 from American Releasing Corporation by James H. Nicholson and Samuel Z. Arkoff, dedicated to releasing independently produced, low-budget films, primarily of interest to the teenagers of the 1950s. Nicholson and Arkoff served as executive producers while Roger Corman and Alex Gordon were the principal film producers and, sometimes, directors. 1957 John Cassavetes shoots Shadows. 1957 Louis B. Mayer, legendary head of MGM and founder of Studio Star system dies. Marking in part the end of the old Hollywood moguls 1961 Method actor and maverick auteur film-maker John Cassavetes' low-budget, black and white, non-Hollywood studio film Shadows, was his first directorial effort - deliberately created as a contrast to Hollywood's studio system. The self-financed, self-distributed cinema verite film (initially shot in 1957) with a jazzy score was a story about an inter-racial couple. It was first publically screened in 1958, but then withdrawn and reshots in 1959, and then re- released - first to European audiences and then to US audiences in 1961. Shot on 16-mm film and using a non-professional cast and crew, the improvisational film symbolized the emergence of the New American Cinema movement, and inspired the growth of underground films and other independent ("indie") and personal works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncanniness of the Shining
    Araştırma Makalesi YAZ 2020/SAYI 24 Research Article SUMMER 2020/ISSUE 24 Erensoy, Ş. F. (2020). The uncanniness of The Shining. yedi: Journal of Art, Design & Science, 24, 37-44. doi: 10.17484/yedi. 685208 The Uncanniness of The Shining Cinnet’in Tekinsizliği Şirin Fulya Erensoy, Department of Film and Television, Istanbul Bilgi University Abstract Özet Stanley Kubrick’s 1980 film The Shining has been examined and Stanley Kubrick’in 1980 yapımı The Shining (Cinnet) filmi, bugüne analyzed countless times up until today. Even though 40 years have kadar sayısız defa incelenmiş ve analiz edilmeye çalışılmıştır. 40 yıl gone by since its release, the film’s full meaning and the events geçmiş olmasına rağmen, filmin gerçekte neyi anlatmak istediği, happening to the Torrance family are still unclear. The film unfolds in Torrance ailesinin başına gelen olayların aslı, hala tam olarak a limbo-like state, between dream and reality. While writing the script, anlaşılmamıştır. Hayal ile gerçek arasında, belirsiz bir alanda Kubrick states that he was inspired by Sigmund Freud’s Das süregelen filmin senaryosunu oluştururken Kubrick, Sigmund Unheimlich (1919) essay. According to Freud, things or people that Freud’un Das Unheimlich (1919) isimli makalesinden yararlandığını arouse feelings of dread and horror belong to the realm of the belirtmiştir. Türkçe’ye tekinsizlik olarak çevrilmiş the uncanny, aşina uncanny. The uncanny is related to what is frightening, but more olduğumuz insan ve şeylerin içinde yatan rahatsız edici duyguların importantly it entails a duality, an ambiguity because it encompasses neden olduğu korku ve endişe olarak nitelendirmektedir. Terimin the familiar with the unfamiliar. This study aims to locate the uncanny temelinde bir ikilik yatmaktadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Kubrick, Jewish Filmmaker: a Review Essay
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 25 Issue 1 April 2021 Article 63 March 2021 Stanley Kubrick, Jewish Filmmaker: A Review Essay Michael Gibson Peter Lang Academic Publishers, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf Part of the American Film Studies Commons, American Material Culture Commons, American Popular Culture Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Gibson, Michael (2021) "Stanley Kubrick, Jewish Filmmaker: A Review Essay," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 25 : Iss. 1 , Article 63. DOI: 10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.25.1.007 Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol25/iss1/63 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stanley Kubrick, Jewish Filmmaker: A Review Essay Abstract This is a review of two books: Nathan Abrams, Stanley Kubrick: New York Jewish Intellectual (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018), and David Mikics, Stanley Kubrick: American Filmmaker (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020). Keywords Stanley Kubrick, cinema, film, Jewish, eligion,r modernity, Hollywood Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Author Notes Michael Gibson is senior acquisitions editor in film and media studies, performing arts, and communication at Peter Lang Academic Publishers and a PhD candidate at Vanderbilt University. He is also a contributing editor in film and culture for The Bias Magazine and is completing a manuscript on Stanley Kubrick for Rutgers University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Kubrick As Auteur and Adapter University of Sydney
    Grant Domonic Malfitano [REDACTION] The Duality of Man: Stanley Kubrick as Auteur and Adapter University of Sydney Faculty of Arts, Department of English Thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Master of Research 1 Statement of Originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. I certify that the intellectual content of this this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. 2 Dedication For my parents, who lit the flame. 3 List of Contents Title Page 1 Statement of Originality 2 Dedication 3 Abstract 5 Introduction - Adaptation and Adaptation Theory; 6 i) Fidelity 10 ii) Intertextuality 11 iii) Raw Material Adaptation 14 iv) The place of the auteur in adaptation studies 16 The Kubrickian Tenets of Adaptation Chapter 1 – Narrative and Structure. 18 Chapter 2 – Visual Technique 35 Chapter 3 – Actor Performance 60 Chapter 4 – Music Selection, Arrangement and Design 85 In Conclusion 103 4 Abstract In this thesis I examine the scholarship of Adaptation Theory, commencing with the seminal work of George Bluestone in 1957, up to and including the more recent approaches of Kyle Meikle (2013), Thomas Leitch (2007), Linda Hutcheon (2006) and both Brian McFarlane (1996) and Karen Kline (1996). Each of these theorists has grappled with the overarching concept of fidelity, the status of film as autonomous art, the status of film authorship, and textual primacy. Secondly, I apply the current scholarship on Adaptation Theory to the work of film auteur, Stanley Kubrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Eyes Wide Shut
    EYES WIDE SHUT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michel Chion | 96 pages | 15 Apr 2008 | British Film Institute | 9780851709321 | English | London, United Kingdom What I Learned After Watching Eyes Wide Shut Times Stanley Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut'' is like an erotic daydream about chances missed and opportunities avoided. For its hero, who spends two nights wandering in the sexual underworld, it's all foreplay. He never actually has sex, but he dances close, and holds his hand in the flame. Why does he do this? The easy answer is that his wife has made him jealous. Another possibility is that the story she tells inflames his rather torpid imagination. The film has the structure of a thriller, with the possibility that conspiracies and murders have taken place. It also resembles a nightmare; a series of strange characters drift in and out of focus, puzzling the hero with unexplained details of their lives. The reconciliation at the end of the film is the one scene that doesn't work; a film that intrigues us because of its loose ends shouldn't try to tidy up. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman star as Dr. Bill and Alice Harford, a married couple who move in rich Manhattan society. In a long, languorous opening sequence, they attend a society ball where a tall Hungarian, a parody of a suave seducer, tries to honey-talk Alice "Did you ever read the Latin poet Ovid on the art of love? Meanwhile, Bill gets a come-on from two aggressive women, before being called to the upstairs bathroom, where Victor Sydney Pollack , the millionaire who is giving the party, has an overdosed hooker who needs a doctor's help.
    [Show full text]
  • Mémoire De Master Le Steadicam
    ENS Louis-Lumière La Cité du Cinéma – 20, rue Ampère BP 12 – 93213 La Plaine Saint-Denis Tel. 33 (0) 1 84 67 00 01 www.ens-louis-lumiere.fr Mémoire de master Spécialité cinéma, promotion 2012-2015 Soutenance de juin 2015 Le steadicam : D'un usage classique à une recherche de déséquilibre et de vitesse Andrzej DAMBSKI Ce mémoire est accompagné de la partie pratique intitulée : Seule Directeur de mémoire : Tony GAUTHIER Présidente du jury cinéma et coordinatrice des mémoires : Giusy PISANO 1 REMERCIEMENTS Je remercie : Noël Véry pour l'interview qu'il m'a accordé, pour la possibilité qu'il m'a donné d’assister en partie aux formations steadicam qu'il a dispensé à la Fémis et au CIFAP, pour la location à prix réduit d'un steadicam avec tous ses accessoires et enfin pour le temps qu'il m'a consacré. Loïc Andrieu pour les deux interviews qu'il m'a accordé et pour sa disponibilité. Richard Mercier pour l'interview et le temps qu'il m'a consacré. Fabrice Carballares, pour avoir répondu à mes questions techniques à Planning Caméra. Chris Fawcett, pour avoir répondu à mes questions au Micro Salon à la Fémis. Philippe Dorelli et Fabienne Roussignol pour m'avoir permis d'assister à une partie des essais caméras incluant des essais steadicam à Panavision et pour avoir répondu à mes interrogations. Enfin, Tony Gauthier, mon directeur de mémoire, pour m'avoir accordé un suivi tout au long de mon mémoire, pour ses nombreux conseils et sa disponibilité sans faille. 2 Résumé Inventé dans le milieu des années 1970, le steadicam est un outil relativement nouveau dans le cinéma.
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Serious Proble.1
    P a g e | 3 ‘A Very Serious Problem with the People Taking Care of the Place’: Duality and the Dionysian Aspect in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining Margot Blankier The Shining , Stanley Kubrick’s first and only foray into the horror-film genre, met with poor reviews when originally released in 1980. 1 The New Yorker ’s Pauline Kael wrote at the time that, though the film had ‘a promising opening sequence’ and ‘some spectacular use of the Steadicam’, The Shining fails in part because Kubrick’s characters are too archetypal: ‘he’s using them to make a metaphysical statement about the timelessness of evil […] that man is a murderer through eternity.’ Ultimately, Kael concludes, Kubrick places the audience at such a distance from his meaning and intention that the film ‘just doesn’t seem to make sense’. 2 Film Quarterly ’s review, though longer and apparently more intrigued by Kubrick’s carefully constructed world, also finds the film ‘unsatisfying’. The ‘symbolic and literal levels of the film tend’, the reviewer writes, ‘to diverge from one another, sometimes to too great an extent to be reunited without artificial devices which confuse the viewer’. 3 The Shining is a confusing film indeed. Interpretations as to its meaning, both scholarly and amateur, range from positioning the film as standard gothic horror to reading it as an indictment of Native American treatment at the hands of white settlers; from rejection of postmodern nostalgia for an idealised past vis-à-vis the ontological netherworld that entraps the film’s protagonist, to a position that defies any logical interpretation whatsoever.
    [Show full text]