TIMELINE of INDEPENDENT CINEMA and the AMERICAN NEW WAVE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kubrick Film Streams Supporters Met Op
Film Streams Programming Calendar The Ruth Sokolof Theater . October – December 2008 v2.2 2001: A Space Odyssey 1968 MGM/Photofest Film Screams! October 3 – October 31, 2008 The Cabinet An American Werewolf of Dr. Caligari 1921 in London 1981 Bride of Frankenstein 1935 Evil Dead 2 1987 The Innocents 1961 Eyes Without a Face 1960 Les Diaboliques 1955 The Raven 1963 What better way to celebrate the Halloween and of little worth artistically, that’s hardly the case. The eight films in this month than with a horror series? While other series offer a glimpse of the richness and variety of the genre, in terms of genres, such as musicals and westerns, tend to its history, cultural significance, creative influence, and talent produced. wax and wane in interest over certain periods of Whether deathly terrifying or horribly silly, there is something here for time, horror has maintained a constant presence everyone to enjoy and appreciate. ever since the inception of cinema. And while the — Andrew Bouska, Film Streams Associate Manager and Series Curator genre often bears the stigma of being lowbrow See the reverse side of this newsletter for full calendar of films and dates. Great Directors: Kubrick November 1 – December 11, 2008 2001: A Space Odyssey 1968 Spartacus 1960 Dr. Strangelove 1964 Lolita 1962 The Killing 1956 Barry Lyndon 1975 A Clockwork Orange 1971 Full Metal Jacket 1987 Paths of Glory 1957 Eyes Wide Shut 1999 Almost a decade after his death, the great myth fiction (2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY) to period drama (BARRY LYNDON) to of Stanley Kubrick seems as mysterious as ever. -
Ross Lipman Urban Ruins, Found Moments
Ross Lipman Urban Ruins, Found Moments Los Angeles premieres Tues Mar 30 | 8:30 pm $9 [students $7, CalArts $5] Jack H. Skirball Series Known as one of the world’s leading restorationists of experimental and independent cinema, Ross Lipman is also an accomplished filmmaker, writer and performer whose oeuvre has taken on urban decay as a marker of modern consciousness. He visits REDCAT with a program of his own lyrical and speculative works, including the films 10-17-88 (1989, 11 min.) and Rhythm 06 (1994/2008, 9 min.), selections from the video cycle The Perfect Heart of Flux, and the performance essay The Cropping of the Spectacle. “Everything that’s built crumbles in time: buildings, cultures, fortunes, and lives,” says Lipman. “The detritus of civilization tells us no less about our current epoch than an archeological dig speaks to history. The urban ruin is particularly compelling because it speaks of the recent past, and reminds us that our own lives and creations will also soon pass into dust. These film, video, and performance works explore decay in a myriad of forms—architectural, cultural, and personal.” In person: Ross Lipman “Lipman’s films are wonderful…. strong and delicate at the same time… unique. The rhythm and colors are so subtle, deep and soft.” – Nicole Brenez, Cinémathèque Française Program Self-Portrait in Mausoleum DigiBeta, 1 min., 2009 (Los Angeles) Refractions and reflections shot in the Hollywood Forever Cemetery: the half-life of death’s advance. Stained glass invokes the sublime in its filtering of light energy, a pre-cinematic cipher announcing a crack between worlds. -
Common Horror Elements 2.Pages
Common Horror Elements 1) “Elements of Aversion” by Elizabeth Barrette - All horror has motifs in common - Elements of absence = Takes away certitudes (constant things in our lives) - The Unknown = primal fear, anything can happen, limitless potential, endless power - The Unexpected = reversal of expectation, confuses what we expect from reality - The Unbelievable = places beyond belief, boundaries of everyday reality - The Unseen = something new and strange, only become visible when something goes seriously wrong - The Unconscious = we fear ourselves, we can neither control nor escape it - The Unstoppable = we can not avoid or control it, confront the inevitable - Elements of Presence = Puts in certitudes, adds an intrusion to our comfort - Helplessness = lack of control, relate to the feeling - Urgency = the feeling that something has to be done, variables that place pressure on it - Pressure = build up of tension adding to urgency, slow build of tension, we connect to it in terms of the pressure in our own life, but is different then reality as it always reaches a resolution - Intensity = heightened awareness and senses, enhances all emotions, drowns out common sense, so all consuming, everything else becomes heightened, drowns out rational thinking of brain. - Rhythm = rise and fall of tension, pattern of action or lack of, comforting or disruptive, playing on our innate desire for the world to make sense - Release = comes to a conclusion, uncertainty keeps us waiting, redemption or disaster offer completion, balance restored or altered, its over, allows us to let the story go - What you get out of it largely depends on how you go into it - Your own fears will sustain you even as they threaten to drive you mad - Come out more powerful then when you went in 2) “The Evolution of American Horror Film” - Major Hollywood Figures in the Horror Genre - Larry Cohen: sophisticated, physiological. -
Free Indirect Affect in Cassavetes' Opening Night and Faces Homay King Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]
Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History of Art Faculty Research and Scholarship History of Art 2004 Free Indirect Affect in Cassavetes' Opening Night and Faces Homay King Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons Custom Citation King, Homay. "Free Indirect Affect in Cassavetes' Opening Night and Faces." Camera Obscura 19, no. 2/56 (2004): 105-139, doi: 10.1215/02705346-19-2_56-105. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs/40 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Homay King, “Free Indirect Affect in Cassavetes’ Opening Night and Faces,” Camera Obscura 56, v. 19, n. 2 (Summer 2004): 104-135. Free Indirect Affect in Cassavetes’ Opening Night and Faces Homay King How to make the affect echo? — Roland Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes1 1. In the Middle of Things: Opening Night John Cassavetes’ Opening Night (1977) begins not with the curtain going up, but backstage. In the first image we see, Myrtle Gordon (Gena Rowlands) has just exited stage left into the wings during a performance of the play The Second Woman. In this play, Myrtle acts the starring role of Virginia, a woman in her early sixties who is trapped in a stagnant second marriage to a photographer. Both Myrtle and Virginia are grappling with age and attempting to come to terms with the choices they have made throughout their lives. -
Why Call Them "Cult Movies"? American Independent Filmmaking and the Counterculture in the 1960S Mark Shiel, University of Leicester, UK
Why Call them "Cult Movies"? American Independent Filmmaking and the Counterculture in the 1960s Mark Shiel, University of Leicester, UK Preface In response to the recent increased prominence of studies of "cult movies" in academic circles, this essay aims to question the critical usefulness of that term, indeed the very notion of "cult" as a way of talking about cultural practice in general. My intention is to inject a note of caution into that current discourse in Film Studies which valorizes and celebrates "cult movies" in particular, and "cult" in general, by arguing that "cult" is a negative symptom of, rather than a positive response to, the social, cultural, and cinematic conditions in which we live today. The essay consists of two parts: firstly, a general critique of recent "cult movies" criticism; and, secondly, a specific critique of the term "cult movies" as it is sometimes applied to 1960s American independent biker movies -- particularly films by Roger Corman such as The Wild Angels (1966) and The Trip (1967), by Richard Rush such as Hell's Angels on Wheels (1967), The Savage Seven, and Psych-Out (both 1968), and, most famously, Easy Rider (1969) directed by Dennis Hopper. Of course, no-one would want to suggest that it is not acceptable to be a "fan" of movies which have attracted the label "cult". But this essay begins from a position which assumes that the business of Film Studies should be to view films of all types as profoundly and positively "political", in the sense in which Fredric Jameson uses that adjective in his argument that all culture and every cultural object is most fruitfully and meaningfully understood as an articulation of the "political unconscious" of the social and historical context in which it originates, an understanding achieved through "the unmasking of cultural artifacts as socially symbolic acts" (Jameson, 1989: 20). -
Introduction to Screenwriting 1: the 5 Elements
Introduction to screenwriting 1: The 5 elements by Allen Palmer Session 1 Introduction www.crackingyarns.com.au 1 Can we find a movie we all love? •Avatar? •Lord of the Rings? •Star Wars? •Groundhog Day? •Raiders of the Lost Ark? •When Harry Met Sally? 2 Why do people love movies? •Entertained •Escape •Educated •Provoked •Affirmed •Transported •Inspired •Moved - laugh, cry 3 Why did Aristotle think people loved movies? •Catharsis •Emotional cleansing or purging •What delivers catharsis? •Seeing hero undertake journey that transforms 4 5 “I think that what we’re seeking is an experience of being alive ... ... so that we can actually feel the rapture being alive.” Joseph Campbell “The Power of Myth” 6 What are audiences looking for? • Expand emotional bandwidth • Reminder of higher self • Universal connection • In summary ... • Cracking yarns 7 8 Me 9 You (in 1 min or less) •Name •Day job •Done any courses? Read any books? Written any screenplays? •Have a concept? •Which film would you like to have written? 10 What’s the hardest part of writing a cracking screenplay? •Concept? •Characters? •Story? •Scenes? •Dialogue? 11 Typical script report Excellent Good Fair Poor Concept X Character X Dialogue X Structure X Emotional Engagement X 12 Story without emotional engagement isn’t story. It’s just plot. 13 Plot isn’t the end. It’s just the means. 14 Stories don’t happen in the head. They grab us by the heart. 15 What is structure? •The craft of storytelling •How we engage emotions •How we generate catharsis •How we deliver what audiences crave 16 -
Bachelorarbeit
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver der Hochschule Mittweida BACHELORARBEIT Frau Annett Petzold Digital Effects in Spielfilmen 2016 Fakultät Medien BACHELORARBEIT Digital Effects in Spielfilmen Autor: Frau Annett Petzold Studiengang: Medientechnik (Ba. Eng.) Seminargruppe: MT12F-B Erstprüfer: Professor Doktor-Ingenieur Robert J. Wierzbicki Zweitprüfer: Master of Science Rika Fleck Einreichung: Mittweida, 08.01.2016 Faculty of Media BACHELOR THESIS Digital Effects in Feature Films author: Ms. Annett Petzold course of studies: Media Engineering seminar group: MT12F-B first examiner: Professor Doctor-Engineer Robert J. Wierzbicki second examiner: Master of Science Rika Fleck submission: Mittweida, 08.01.2016 IV Bibliografische Angaben: Nachname, Vorname: Digital Effects in Spielfilmen: Werden Spezialeffekte in Zukunft nur noch digital umgesetzt? Digital Effects in Feature Films: Are there going to be only computer- generated effects in the future? 2016 - 69 Seiten Mittweida, Hochschule Mittweida (FH), University of Applied Sciences, Fakultät Medien, Bachelorarbeit, 2016 Abstract Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, den aktuellen Einsatz von Filmeffekten im Spielfilmbereich zu untersuchen und mit Hilfe der Ergebnisse auf zukünftige Entwicklungen zu schließen. Im Fokus des Forschungsinteresses steht dabei die Frage, ob Digital Effects das Potential besitzen, den Gebrauch traditioneller Special Effects auf lange Sicht in Spielfilmproduktionen zu ersetzen. Diese Untersuchungen -
The New Hollywood Films
The New Hollywood Films The following is a chronological list of those films that are generally considered to be "New Hollywood" productions. Shadows (1959) d John Cassavetes First independent American Film. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966) d. Mike Nichols Bonnie and Clyde (1967) d. Arthur Penn The Graduate (1967) d. Mike Nichols In Cold Blood (1967) d. Richard Brooks The Dirty Dozen (1967) d. Robert Aldrich Dont Look Back (1967) d. D.A. Pennebaker Point Blank (1967) d. John Boorman Coogan's Bluff (1968) – d. Don Siegel Greetings (1968) d. Brian De Palma 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) d. Stanley Kubrick Planet of the Apes (1968) d. Franklin J. Schaffner Petulia (1968) d. Richard Lester Rosemary's Baby (1968) – d. Roman Polanski The Producers (1968) d. Mel Brooks Bullitt (1968) d. Peter Yates Night of the Living Dead (1968) – d. George Romero Head (1968) d. Bob Rafelson Alice's Restaurant (1969) d. Arthur Penn Easy Rider (1969) d. Dennis Hopper Medium Cool (1969) d. Haskell Wexler Midnight Cowboy (1969) d. John Schlesinger The Rain People (1969) – d. Francis Ford Coppola Take the Money and Run (1969) d. Woody Allen The Wild Bunch (1969) d. Sam Peckinpah Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) d. Paul Mazursky Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid (1969) d. George Roy Hill They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969) – d. Sydney Pollack Alex in Wonderland (1970) d. Paul Mazursky Catch-22 (1970) d. Mike Nichols MASH (1970) d. Robert Altman Love Story (1970) d. Arthur Hiller Airport (1970) d. George Seaton The Strawberry Statement (1970) d. -
ASC History Timeline 1919-2019
American Society of Cinematographers Historical Timeline DRAFT 8/31/2018 Compiled by David E. Williams February, 1913 — The Cinema Camera Club of New York and the Static Camera Club of America in Hollywood are organized. Each consists of cinematographers who shared ideas about advancing the art and craft of moviemaking. By 1916, the two organizations exchange membership reciprocity. They both disband in February of 1918, after five years of struggle. January 8, 1919 — The American Society of Cinematographers is chartered by the state of California. Founded by 15 members, it is dedicated to “advancing the art through artistry and technological progress … to help perpetuate what has become the most important medium the world has known.” Members of the ASC subsequently play a seminal role in virtually every technological advance that has affects the art of telling stories with moving images. June 20, 1920 — The first documented appearance of the “ASC” credential for a cinematographer in a theatrical film’s titles is the silent western Sand, produced by and starring William S. Hart and shot by Joe August, ASC. November 1, 1920 — The first issue of American Cinematographer magazine is published. Volume One, #1, consists of four pages and mostly reports news and assignments of ASC members. It is published twice monthly. 1922 — Guided by ASC members, Kodak introduced panchromatic film, which “sees” all of the colors of the rainbow, and recorded images’ subtly nuanced shades of gray, ranging from the darkest black to the purest white. The Headless Horseman is the first motion picture shot with the new negative. The cinematographer is Ned Van Buren, ASC. -
Innovators: Filmmakers
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INNOVATORS: FILMMAKERS David W. Galenson Working Paper 15930 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15930 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 April 2010 The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by David W. Galenson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Innovators: Filmmakers David W. Galenson NBER Working Paper No. 15930 April 2010 JEL No. Z11 ABSTRACT John Ford and Alfred Hitchcock were experimental filmmakers: both believed images were more important to movies than words, and considered movies a form of entertainment. Their styles developed gradually over long careers, and both made the films that are generally considered their greatest during their late 50s and 60s. In contrast, Orson Welles and Jean-Luc Godard were conceptual filmmakers: both believed words were more important to their films than images, and both wanted to use film to educate their audiences. Their greatest innovations came in their first films, as Welles made the revolutionary Citizen Kane when he was 26, and Godard made the equally revolutionary Breathless when he was 30. Film thus provides yet another example of an art in which the most important practitioners have had radically different goals and methods, and have followed sharply contrasting life cycles of creativity. -
BAM Presents NYC Horror, Oct 31—Nov 5, a Series of New York Nightmares
BAM presents NYC Horror, Oct 31—Nov 5, a series of New York nightmares October 3, 2019/Brooklyn, NY—From Thursday, October 31 through Tuesday, November 5, BAM presents NYC Horror, a series that explores the terrors, both supernatural and quotidian, of life in New York City. The series begins with Michael Almereyda’s downtown vampire film, Nadja (1994), which blends poetic horror and deadpan comedy, accompanied by lustrous black-and-white cinematography and a dreamy soundtrack featuring My Bloody Valentine and Portishead. Other films include Bill Gun’s visionary, avant- garde mélange of vampire tales and Afrocentric mythologies Ganja & Hess (1973), which filmed at the Brooklyn Museum; Brian De Palma’s Staten Island-set, lurid psychosexual thriller Sisters (1973); Mary Harron’s controversial, bloody satire of Wall Street greed and white male privilege American Psycho (2000); Michael Winner’s satanism-in-Brooklyn shocker The Sentinel (1977); Larry Cohen’s subversive, sci-fi portrait of society gone mad God Told Me To (1976), as well as his Q (1982), the director’s homage to Ray Harryhausen-style creature-features; and Michael Wadleigh’s werewolf flick-cum-gentrification critique Wolfen (1981). The series continues with Mark Robson and B-movie producer extraordinaire Val Lewton’s Greenwich Village-set The Seventh Victim (1943), one of the most haunting, transgressive horror films of Hollywood’s Golden Age; the Wes Craven-directed Eddie Murphy cult comedy Vampire in Brooklyn (1995); George P. Cosmatos’ darkly relatable tale of man-versus-rat, Of Unknown Origin (1983); writer- director-producer-star James Bond III’s stylish monster horror Def by Temptation (1990), shot by legendary cinematographer Ernest Dickerson; and cult auteur Larry Fessenden’s portrait of alcoholic paranoia and emotional (and possibly literal) vampirism, Habit (1995). -
Race on the Road: from the Periphery to the Centre in Jonathan Kaplan's Love Field
RACE ON THE ROAD: FROM THE PERIPHERY TO THE CENTRE IN JONATHAN KAPLAN’S LOVE FIELD Carmen Indurain Eraso Universidad Pública de Navarra Following a general cinematic trend, the road movie genre in its beginnings relegated the representation of non-whites to the periphery. After analysing the general state of affairs of racial representation in the genre, we witness in the 1990s a timid but remarkable trend to produce “racial” road movies which vindicate the rights of central representation of racial minorities. This paper analyses a representative racial road film, Jonathan Kaplan’s Love Field (1992), in an attempt to show that the road movie’s generic conventions and traditional liberal pedigree may provide a context where the depiction of racial minorities and race relations may finally reach a central status. In the road movie we have an ideogram of human desire and the last ditch search for self, and who is more plagued for hunger and lostness than the socially disenfranchised? (Atkinson 1994:14). 1. RACE ON THE ROAD: A PERIPHERAL PRESENCE While it reminds us of the inner search, a basic trait of the road movie genre, this quotation by Michael Atkinson also makes the significant point that the socially marginalised are liable to experience an even greater need for this personal quest. As members of this underprivileged group together with women, non-whites can feel more intensely the “call to adventure”, to flee from an emotionally retarded society which has failed to integrate them satisfactorily. Thus, given their unfavourable condition in society which has traditionally allotted them a peripheral position as mere accessories to the white male, African Americans, Hispanics or Native ES 27 (2006-7): 75-94 76 CARMEN INDURAIN ERASO American Indians have started to find a central space of cinematic representation in the road genre.