DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Karst Site Assessment, Camp Bullis, Texas: Maneuver Areas 8, 9, 10, and 11, and Southern Cantonment 144

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Karst Site Assessment, Camp Bullis, Texas: Maneuver Areas 8, 9, 10, and 11, and Southern Cantonment 144 MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF RARE AND ENDANGERED KARST SPECIES, CAMP BULLIS, BEXAR AND COMAL COUNTIES, TEXAS by George Veni Ph.D., James R. Reddell, and James C. Cokendolpher Executive Summary Camp Bullis is a 113.3-km2 military training facility under the Fort Sam Houston Command. It is located in north-central Bexar County and southwestern Comal County. Camp Bullis’ mission is to provide field training and support for military activities in south Texas, including weapons training, field training and maneuvers, map and compass courses, parachute operations training, combat assault landing training, and field medical training. Soon after the now-listed species were petitioned for endangered listing, Camp Bullis initiated a series of cave and karst investigations that continue to the present in order to pro-actively evaluate the installation’s potential to contain the species and manage those species according to the best available scientific information (Veni and Elliott, 1994; Veni et al., 1995, 1996, 1998a, 1998b, 1999, 2000, 2002a, 2002b). To date, three of the species have been found on the installation, Cicurina (Cicurella) madla, Rhadine exilis, Rhadine infernalis. Additionally, one species on the State of Texas list of threatened species has been found, Eurycea tridentifera, plus 15 new or possibly new species known only from Camp Bullis. The presence of these listed and rare species of concern suggests that Camp Bullis has effectively managed its impact to the environment and these animals. This includes the potential impacts from the installation’s live fire ranges where one of the listed species is known to occur in five caves despite several decades of firearm use. With the increasing rate of urban development of the area around the installation, Camp Bullis may become an important refuge where these and other listed and rare species will continue to survive. The mission requirements of Camp Bullis demand the presence of large tracts of undeveloped land for training operations that are mostly compatible with successfully preserving in perpetuity the ecosystems of the listed species and species of concern. This management plan is designed to minimize and/or direct potentially detrimental impacts away from those species where feasible, including impacts (like fire ant infestation) not resulting from Camp Bullis actions. Where impacts to the species cannot be avoided, Camp Bullis will enter into consultations with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This management plan represents the cumulative efforts of Camp Bullis to eliminate, mitigate, and prevent harm to the four federally or state-listed species and the 15 rare but unlisted species of concern. All of the species are troglobites, known only from caves and related karst voids, and all but the state-listed species are invertebrates. Most of the species are known only from Camp Bullis. 1 This plan is written in the format of a USFWS recovery plan to best address past and current threats and management actions, and to efficiently propose and coordinate future management action for the species, including an Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation if necessary with USFWS for the listed species. By proposing a plan that includes non-listed species of concern, Camp Bullis can take a broader and more effective ecosystem-based approach to species management, similar to habitat conservation plans. This management plan is designed to provide detailed steps for management of the listed karst species and species of concern at Camp Bullis and to outline a general strategy for situations not covered by specific management actions. The management plan has two goals: 1) preservation and protection of the listed karst species and species of concern and their habitat in perpetuity, within the limits possible through the caves, land, and authority of Camp Bullis and its operational and mission requirements; 2) ensure the species’ survival, genetic diversity, and evolution in a manner consistent with the delisting or downlisting of endangered and threatened karst species as recognized by the USFWS (1994) recovery plan for related listed species in the Austin, Texas, area. Below is an outline of the tasks needed to meet the objectives of this plan. Narrative descriptions of the tasks are discussed in the plan followed by specific management recommendations for the 32 karst management areas. Attainment of this plan will proceed as allowed by funding and Camp Bullis’ mission and operational requirements. 1. Identify karst management areas needed to meet the management plan criteria. 2. Determine the appropriate size and shape of the karst management areas. 3. Provide protection in perpetuity to the karst management areas. 3.1 Coordinate with USFWS, TPWD, and other agencies. 3.2 Review and update Camp Bullis regulations as needed. 4. Implement conservation measures and manage karst management areas. 4.1 Apply USFWS fire ant management techniques. 4.2 Identify and protect important sources of nutrients into karst ecosystems. 4.3 Determine and implement appropriate means to prevent siltation and/or entry of other contaminants to the karst management areas. 4.4 Determine and implement appropriate means to prevent vandalism, dumping of trash, and unauthorized human entry of caves and karst features. 4.5 Other actions as needed. 5. Additional research. 5.1 Conduct additional karst and biospeleological surveys. 5.2 Continue hydrogeologic studies of karst management areas that are currently incomplete. 5.3 Conduct additional studies on the ecology of the listed species and species of concern. 5.4 Revise the karst species management plan as needed. 6. Education 6.1 Develop educational programs to raise awareness and encourage protection of karst ecosystems by Camp Bullis personnel. 6.2 Develop educational programs on karst ecology and hydrogeology to help 2 key Camp Bullis personnel with the management of the karst management areas and the listed species and species of concern. 6.3 Develop educational information for public relations. 7. Monitoring The one notable management issue involves the ability of Camp Bullis to redirect the training at the live fire ranges. Reorienting these firing areas is not feasible within the current Army training doctrine or funding level of the installation. Activities on the ranges that could have a detrimental effect are accidental fires that destroy native vegetation, mowing around the target arrays, bullet strikes around and near cave entrances that damage the vegetation, and the release of potentially harmful levels of heavy metals to the environment. Camp Bullis will mitigate these possible impacts by undertaking the following actions on the live fire ranges: 1) Any accidental range fire will be fought vigorously in the area around any cave on a live fire range to limit the impact to the smallest possible area. 2) A buffer area of 10 meters will not be mowed around cave entrances on the live fire ranges. 3) Camp Bullis will continue to monitor water leaving the live fire ranges for contaminants that may prove detrimental to the cave species. 4) Camp Bullis will enter into consultation with the USFWS if there is a major increase in training activity near any cave with listed species. 3 Introduction The Bexar County, Texas, region is hydrogeologically and biologically complex. Species living in the region’s caves have become physically isolated from each other through time, resulting in genetic isolation that has produced new species known to occur only within small geographic areas. The northward expansion of San Antonio onto the karst areas where these species occur poses a threat to their survival. This is due to the destruction of caves, sealing of caves, changes in nutrient and moisture input into caves, contaminants introduced into caves, and competition with and predation by non-native species introduced by urbanization (Elliott, 1993a, 2000). Due to concern about their survival, nine species of karst invertebrates were federally listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in December 2000 (USFWS, 2000a), with critical habitat proposed in August 2002 (USFWS, 2002): Batrisodes (Excavodes) venyivi Neoleptoneta microps Cicurina (Cicurella) baronia Rhadine exilis Cicurina (Cicurella) madla Rhadine infernalis Cicurina (Cicurella) venii Texella cokendolpheri Cicurina (Cicurella) vespera These species are currently only known from northern and parts of western Bexar County. Camp Bullis is a 113.3-km2 military training facility under the Fort Sam Houston Command. It is located in north-central Bexar County and southwestern Comal County. Camp Bullis’ mission is to provide field training and support for military activities in south Texas, including weapons training, field training and maneuvers, map and compass courses, parachute operations training, combat assault landing training, and field medical training. Soon after the now-listed species were petitioned for endangered listing, Camp Bullis initiated a series of cave and karst investigations that continue to the present in order to pro-actively evaluate the installation’s potential to contain the species and manage those species according to the best available scientific information (Veni and Elliott, 1994; Veni et al., 1995, 1996, 1998a, 1998b, 1999, 2000, 2002a, 2002b). To date, three of the species have been found on the installation, Cicurina (Cicurella) madla, Rhadine exilis, Rhadine infernalis, plus 15 new or possibly new species known only from Camp
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Headstart 08/1994 Program (NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-3) TED Regulations for Shrimp Trawls 57 FR 57348 12/04/1992 Recovery Plan - U.S
    Fishing Permits Habitat Conservation Grants Fisheries Environmental Analyses Endangered Spec Search Go fish! nmlkji This si nmlkj All of NMFS Home Threatened and Endangered Species Divisions/Branches Lists What We Do Fishery Bulletins The following list of species under NMFS Fishery Quotas jurisdiction, listed as threatened or endangered, Fishery Regulations for each state and territory. Click on the state, News/Media territory or areas below to view a list of Species: National Employee 1. Southeast Region (North Carolina to Texas and Locator the Caribbean) FOIA Information 2. South Atlantic (North Carolina to Key West Public Records Florida) Request 3. Gulf of Mexico 4. Alabama 5. Florida - Atlantic Coast 6. Florida - Gulf Coast 7. Georgia 8. Louisiana 9. Mississippi 10. North Carolina 11. Puerto Rico 12. South Carolina 13. Texas 14. U.S. Virgin Islands Home · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · About Us · Information Quality · Contact Us · Last Updated: February 2, 2010 NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources OPR Home | About OPR | Species | Permits | Laws & Policies | Programs | Education | Publications Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) Species Marine Mammals Status | Taxonomy | Species Description | Habitat | Distribution | Cetaceans Population Trends | Threats | Conservation Efforts | Regulatory Overview | Pinnipeds Key Documents | More Info Marine Turtles Marine & Anadromous Fish Status Marine Invertebrates & ESA Threatened - throughout its range Plants Species of Concern Taxonomy Threatened & Endangered Kingdom: Animalia Species Phylum: Chordata Critical Habitat Maps Class: Reptilia Order: Testudines Loggerhead turtle hatchling (Caretta caretta) Family: Cheloniidae Contact OPR Photo: Mary Wozny, Broward Glossary Genus: Caretta County Florida Sea Turtle OPR Site Map Species: caretta Conservation Program Species Description Did You Know? Loggerheads were named for their relatively large heads, which support powerful jaws and enable them to feed on Search OPR hard-shelled prey, such as whelks and conch.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester's Guardian Underground Telephone Exchange
    Article for Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society Manchester’s Guardian Underground Telephone Exchange Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture Martin Dodge, Department of Geography, University of Manchester Introduction Deep under the heart of Manchester city centre lies a large network of reinforced concrete tunnels known as the Guardian Underground Telephone Exchange (GUTE). It is an ageing relic from the beginning of the Cold War era, built with some degree of secrecy in the mid 1950s, but it still operates silently and largely unmanned as an infrastructural space facilitating the communications of those above. Surprisingly little information regarding the GUTE is readily accessible and the subterranean nature of the structure itself acts to entomb the reality of its shape and scale. A lack of concrete information has allowed facts to be supplanted by myths, fostering numerous (mis)perceptions of the same intangible space. The GUTE was conceived during a time of escalating international tensions in the early 1950s as a ‘hardened’ bunker to protect vital national communication links in the event of an atomic bomb attack upon Manchester. However, this defining characteristic of subterranean defence was never achieved because, even before construction was complete in 1958, advances in nuclear weapons yield and the accuracy of intercontinental ballistic missiles meant the tunnel design would be ineffective for protection of the telecommunications machinery and personnel working within. The bombproof tunnels
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservation Focused Inventory of Subterranean Invertebrates of the Southwest Illinois Karst
    Julian J. Lewis, Philip Moss, Diane Tecic, and Matthew E. Nelson - A conservation focused inventory of subterranean invertebrates of the southwest Illinois Karst. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 65, n. 1, p. 9-21. A CONSERVATION FOCUSED INVENTORY OF SUBTERRANEAN INVERTEBRATES OF THE SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS KARST JULIAN J. LEWIS J. Lewis and Associates, Biological Consulting, 217 W. Carter Avenue, Clarksville, IN 47129 USA PHILIP MOSS Ozark Underground Laboratory, 1572 Aley Lane, Protem, MO 65733 USA DIANE TECIC Natural Heritage Regional Administrator, 4521 Alton Commerce Parkwary, Alton, IL 62025 USA MATTHEW E. NELSON formerly The Nature Conservancy; current 7401 Placer Run, Fort Wayne, IN 46815 USA In 1998-1999 The Nature Conservancy conducted a bioinventory of caves in Monroe and St. Clair coun- ties in southwestern Illinois. This karst area comprises a small section of the Ozark Plateau isolated from the Missouri Ozarks by the Mississippi River. In the 71 sites that were sampled, 41 species thought to be globally rare were found and were assigned state (S) and global (G) ranks of rarity for conservation use. The list includes 10 species considered to be new to science and 12 species previously unreported from Illinois. Twenty four taxa were classified as obligate subterranean species, including four endemic species: the pseudoscorpion Mundochthonius cavernicolus, the amphipod Gammarus acherondytes, the milliped Chaetaspis sp. (undescribed), and the dipluran Eumesocampa sp. (undescribed). Gammarus acherondytes, recently listed as an endangered species, was found in six previously unsampled caves. All sites were rank-ordered according to the number of global and state rare species. The greatest single site diversity was found in Fogelpole Cave with 18 global and 20 state rare species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan
    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan March 2008 Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan BEXAR COUNTY KARST INVERTEBRATES DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2008 Approved: ___DRAFT_______________________________________ Regional Director, Southwest Region Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concur: __DRAFT____________________________________________ Executive Director Date Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ii Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that the best available science indicates are necessary to recover or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), but are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only. Identification of an action to be implemented by any private or public party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act (U.S.C. 1341) or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after the plan has been signed by the Regional Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D4: Twg #2 Kgs Meeting Report
    APPENDIX D4: TWG #2 KGS MEETING REPORT Draft Kendall Gateway Feasibility Report January 2019 Technical Work Group Meeting #2 Kendall Gateway Study San Antonio District in cooperation with Kendall County and the City of Boerne Kendall County, Texas March 2017 The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2. Attendance ................................................................................................................ 1 3. Welcome and Introductions ...................................................................................... 2 4. Round 1 Overview...................................................................................................... 2 4.1 Technical Work Group #1 Meeting .......................................................... 2 4.2 Stakeholder Working Group #1 Meeting ................................................. 3 4.3 Open House #1 ......................................................................................... 3 5. Constraints Maps ...................................................................................................... 4 6. Traffic Analysis Update .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Down Under Newsletter of the National Caves Association
    DOWN UNDER NEWSLETTER OF THE NATIONAL CAVES ASSOCIATION VOLUME III - NO. 4 DECEMBER. 1968 34 DOWN UNOt" NEWSLETTER OF THE NATIONAL CAVES ASSOCIATION EDITOR: ROY A. DAVIS, Cumberland Caverns, McMinnville, Tenn. 37110 RODNEY SCHAEFFER, Pres. TOM GIBSqN, Vice-Pres. ROY A. DAVIS, Sec. Howe's Caverns Skyline Caverns Cumberland Caverns Howe's Cave, N. Y. Front Royal, Virginia McMinnville, Tenn. REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENTS: ~, 1. Russell Slyden, Penn's Cave, ~entre'Hall, Pa. 2. Dick Bell, Seneca Caverns, Bettvue, Ohio 3. Frank Raulston, Wonder Cave] Monteagle, Tenn. 4. Eddie Mi.Iler , Bridal Cave, Camdenton, Mo. 5. Clara. Heidemann, Natural Bridge Caverns, San Antonio, Texas 6. Carl Brechler, Cave of the Mounds, Blue Mounds, Wis. DOWN UNDER is published quarterly by the NATIONAL CAVES ASSOCIATION, Rt. 6, McMinn,yille, Tenn. 37110. Areacode 615, 668-4396. Material for publi- cation should be sent to the Edit9r at the above address. COV€R: 'I'hle month's cover photo is "Mottern Art", free-form stalagmite of white and orange, one of the scenic points t n CENTURY CAVERNS, Boerne, Texas. BULLETIN: Tom Gibson recently Infor-med us that Past President Ted Graves, Luray Caverns, was in a very serious auto accident Dec. 7,' Ted suffered multiple fractures of the right leg, a broken left ankle and left wrist, and several broken ribs. He was taken to the Rockingham Memorial Hospital at Harrisonburg, Va., and was in the in- tensive care unit there for about a week. He is now in a private room in the same hos- pital and is expected to be in traction t here until early February.
    [Show full text]
  • For Creative Minds
    For Creative Minds The For Creative Minds educational section may be photocopied or printed from our website by the owner of this book for educational, non-commercial uses. Cross-curricular teaching activities, interactive quizzes, and more are available online. Go to www.ArbordalePublishing.com and click on the book’s cover to explore all the links. Animal Homes Animals use homes to sleep, to hide from predators, to raise their young, to store food, and even to hide from weather (heat, cold, rain, or snow). All animals find shelter in or around things that are found in the habitat where they live— living (plants or even other animals) or non-living (water, rocks, or soil). Some animals stay in one location for long periods of time while other animals might make a home for short periods of time—as long as it takes to raise young or when travelling. Animals use dens as nurseries to raise their young. Dens can be burrows, caves, holes, or even small areas under bushes and trees. Caves protect animals from the hot sun during the day. They also provide shelter from wind and cold weather. Some caves are so deep underground that there is no sunlight at the bottom! Narrow cracks in rocks (crevices) and tree holes protect animals from larger predators. Most animals can’t make crevices bigger but many animals make holes bigger. Once they have a hole big enough, they move in. A burrow is an underground hole or tunnel. Some burrows have one entrance but other burrows may have many “rooms” and several ways in and out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Microhabitats in Structuring Cave Invertebrate Communities in Guatemala Gabrielle S.M
    International Journal of Speleology 49 (2) 161-169 Tampa, FL (USA) May 2020 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie The role of microhabitats in structuring cave invertebrate communities in Guatemala Gabrielle S.M. Pacheco 1*, Marconi Souza Silva 1, Enio Cano 2, and Rodrigo L. Ferreira 1 1Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Setor de Biodiversidade Subterrânea, Centro de Estudos em Biologia Subterrânea, Caixa Postal 3037, CEP 37200-900, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brasil 2Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Ciudad Universitaria, Zona 12, 01012, Guatemala City, Guatemala Abstract: Several studies have tried to elucidate the main environmental features driving invertebrate community structure in cave environments. They found that many factors influence the community structure, but rarely focused on how substrate types and heterogeneity might shape these communities. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess which substrate features and whether or not substrate heterogeneity determines the invertebrate community structure (species richness and composition) in a set of limestone caves in Guatemala. We hypothesized that the troglobitic fauna responds differently to habitat structure regarding species richness and composition than non-troglobitic fauna because they are more specialized to live in subterranean habitats. Using 30 m2 transects, the invertebrate fauna was collected and the substrate features were measured. The results showed that community responded to the presence of guano, cobbles, boulders, and substrate heterogeneity. The positive relationship between non-troglobitic species composition with the presence of guano reinforces the importance of food resources for structuring invertebrate cave communities in Guatemalan caves.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District Of
    4:02-cv-03093-LES-DLP Doc # 109 Filed: 06/01/06 Page 1 of 20 - Page ID # 1322 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA INSURANCE AGENCY OF BEAVER ) CROSSING, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) 4:02CV3093 ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) MEMORANDUM OPINION COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION, ) an agency of the United States ) of America within the Department ) of Agriculture. ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) The plaintiff, Insurance Agency of Beaver Crossing, Inc. (“Beaver Crossing”), commenced this action against the United States of America and the Commodity Credit Corporation (“the CCC”), an agency within the United States Department of Agriculture (“the USDA”), under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., seeking damages for negligence and private nuisance.1 Beaver Crossing alleges that the CCC, which operated a grain storage facility across from Beaver Crossing’s farmland (“the Property”) from approximately 1950-1974, negligently handled grain fumigants containing carbon tetrachloride (“CT”) so as to allow the CT to migrate through the 1 Beaver Crossing’s amended complaint also asserted claims against the government for inverse condemnation and trespass. Both of these claims have since been dismissed (See Filing Nos. 23 & 85). 4:02-cv-03093-LES-DLP Doc # 109 Filed: 06/01/06 Page 2 of 20 - Page ID # 1323 soil and contaminate the shallow aquifer below Beaver Crossing’s farmland. A trial to the Court, sitting without a jury, was held on May 15-18, 2006. The Court, having considered the evidence, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, hereby enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Confraternity Thn Lng Folk 2Go
    Edinburgh Research Explorer thN Lng folk 2go Citation for published version: Mulholland, N & Hogg, N 2013, thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns (TM). Punctum , New York. <http://punctumbooks.com> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 thN Lng folk 2go thN Lng folk 2go Investigating Future Premoderns™ The Confraternity of Neoflagellants punctum books ! brooklyn, ny thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns™ © The Confraternity of Neoflagellants [Norman Hogg and Neil Mulholland], 2013. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is Open Access, which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for commercial gain in any form whatsoever, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build upon the work outside of its normal use in academic scholarship without express permission of the author and the publisher of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Las Moras Seco Creek K Er LAVACA MEDINA US HWY 77 Springs Uvalde LEGEND Medina River
    Cedar Creek Reservoir NAVARRO HENDERSON HILL BOSQUE BROWN ERATH 281 RUNNELS COLEMAN Y ANDERSON S HW COMANCHE U MIDLAND GLASSCOCK STERLING COKE Colorado River 3 7 7 HAMILTON LIMESTONE 2 Y 16 Y W FREESTONE US HW W THE HIDDEN HEART OF TEXAS H H S S U Y 87 U Waco Lake Waco McLENNAN San Angelo San Angelo Lake Concho River MILLS O.H. Ivie Reservoir UPTON Colorado River Horseshoe Park at San Felipe Springs. Popular swimming hole providing relief from hot Texas summers. REAGAN CONCHO U S HW Photo courtesy of Gregg Eckhardt. Y 183 Twin Buttes McCULLOCH CORYELL L IRION Reservoir 190 am US HWY LAMPASAS US HWY 87 pasas R FALLS US HWY 377 Belton U S HW TOM GREEN Lake B Y 67 Brady iver razos R iver LEON Temple ROBERTSON Lampasas Stillhouse BELL SAN SABA Hollow Lake Salado MILAM MADISON San Saba River Nava BURNET US HWY 183 US HWY 190 Salado sota River Lake TX HWY 71 TX HWY 29 MASON Buchanan N. San G Springs abriel Couple enjoying the historic mill at Barton Springs in 1902. R Mason Burnet iver Photo courtesy of Center for American History, University of Texas. SCHLEICHER MENARD Y 29 TX HW WILLIAMSON BRAZOS US HWY 83 377 Llano S. S an PECOS Gabriel R US HWY iver Georgetown US HWY 163 Llano River Longhorn Cavern Y 79 Sonora LLANO Inner Space Caverns US HW Eckert James River Bat Cave US HWY 95 Lake Lyndon Lake Caverns B. Johnson Junction Travis CROCKETT of Sonora BURLESON 281 GILLESPIE BLANCO Y KIMBLE W TRAVIS SUTTON H GRIMES TERRELL S U US HWY 290 US HWY 16 US HWY P Austin edernales R Fredericksburg Barton Springs 21 LEE Somerville Lake AUSTIN Pecos
    [Show full text]