SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary 1. International

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary 1. International SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary 1. International Myositis Classification Criteria Project Steering Committee Supplementary 2. Pilot study Supplementary 3. International Myositis Classification Criteria Project questionnaire Supplementary 4. Glossary and definitions for the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project questionnaire Supplementary 5. Adult comparator cases in the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project dataset Supplementary 6. Juvenile comparator cases in the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project dataset Supplementary 7. Validation cohort from the Euromyositis register Supplementary 8. Validation cohort from the Juvenile dermatomyositis cohort biomarker study and repository (UK and Ireland) 1 Supplementary 1. International Myositis Classification Criteria Project Steering Committee Name Affiliation Lars Alfredsson Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Anthony A Amato Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA Richard J Barohn Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA Matteo Bottai Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Matthew H Liang Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Boston, USA Ingrid E Lundberg (Project Director) Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Frederick W Miller Environmental Autoimmunity Group, Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, USA Clarissa Pilkington Department of Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom Lisa G Rider Environmental Autoimmunity Group, Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, USA Jasvinder A Singh University of Alabama and Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, USA & Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Marianne de Visser Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands Victoria P Werth Department of Dermatology, Philadelphia VAMC and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA Anna Tjärnlund (Project Coordinator) Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 2 Supplementary 2. Pilot study IIM IIM Not IIM Not IIM Category Variable % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) Sensitivity Specificity present missing present missing (%) (%) Weakness, Proximal UE 97 (33) 0 71 (10) 0 97 29 Clinical Wrist or FF weakness 56 (19) 6 (2) 2 (15) 1 (7) 56 79 Muscle Wrist/FF > shoulder abductors 18 (6) 9 (3) 7 (1) 14 (2) 18 79 Weakness, Proximal LE 97 (33) 0 50 (7) 0 97 50 Hip abductor weakness 88 (30) 6 (2) 43 (6) 7 (1) 88 50 Weakness distal LE 41 (14) 0 21 (3) 14 (2) 41 64 Knee extensors weaker than hip 18 (6) 6 (2) 7 (1) 14 (2) 18 79 Neck flexor weakness 85 (29) 0 43 (6) 0 85 57 Neck extensor weakness 21 (7) 21 (7) 7 (1) 21 (3) 21 71 Symmetric weakness 85 (29) 0 57 (8) 7 (1) 85 36 Muscle pain at rest 32 (11) 18 (6) 29 (4) 0 32 71 Muscle tenderness 35 (12) 9 (3) 7 (1) 7 (1) 35 86 Muscle atrophy distal forearms 18 (6) 3 (1) 0 0 18 100 Thigh atrophy 32 (11) 3 (1) 0 0 32 100 Heliotrope 38 (13) 0 0 0 38 100 Clinical 14 (2 Skin Gottron's papules 44 (15) 0 DM sine) 0 44 86 Rashes Erythema extensor surfaces 35 (12) 0 29 (4) 0 35 71 V-sign 21 (7) 0 7 (1) 0 21 93 Shawl sign 24 (8) 0 0 0 24 100 Calcification 9 (3) 3 (1) 0 0 9 100 Periungual erythema, petechiae, telangiectasis, cuticular overgrowth 41 (14) 0 7 (1) 0 41 93 Raynaud's 18 (6) 3 (1) 29 (4) 0 18 71 Family history AD 26 (9) 9 (3) 28 (4) 0 26 71 Clinical Acute onset 71 (24) 3 (1) 43 (6) 0 71 57 Other Arthritis 47 (16) 0 43 (6) 0 47 57 Polyarthralgias 44 (15) 0 50 (7) 0 44 50 Sjogren's syndrome 3 (1) 0 7 (1) 0 3 93 Systemic sclerosis 0 0 7 (1) 0 0 93 MCTD 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rheumatoid arthritis 0 3 (1) 43 (6) 0 0 57 SLE 3 (1) 0 29 (4) 0 3 71 Autoimmune thyroid disease 12 (4) 18 (6) 7 (1) 42 (6) 12 50 Objective improvement strength after corticosteroid therapy 79 (27) 6 (2) 43 (6) 43 (6) 79 14 No improvement strength after corticosteroid 3 (1) 35 (12) 14 (2) 43 (6) 3 43 Abbreviations: IIM=idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, UE=upper extremities, FF=finger flexors, LE=lower extremities, DM=dermatomyositis, AD=autoimmune disease, MCTD=mixed connective tissue disease, SLE=systemic lupus erythematosus 3 Supplementary 3. International Myositis Classification Criteria Project questionnaire Item Alternatives Have you received approval from your local IRB or □ Yes ethics committee for participation in this project? □ Exempt □ No Has your patient been diagnosed with the diagnosis □ Yes relevant for this study for more than 6 months? □ No (A yes is required, if No select a new case) Center (name of university or hospital from where data is entered) Clinician submitting case Case number Gender □ Female □ Male Age (years) at onset of first symptom assumed to be related to the disease Age (years) at diagnosis Age (years) at last evaluation Ethnicity □ Caucasian □ Of African descent □ Of Asian descent □ Of Native American descent □ Of Pacific Island descent □ Of Hispanic descent □ Of Mixed descent □ Unknown Study diagnosis according to the clinician submitting □ Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) adults or the case children □ Not Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (Not IIM) adults or children Study diagnosis: Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy □ Polymyositis (IIM) in adults or children □ Dermatomyositis □ Amyopathic dermatomyositis □ Hypomyopathic dermatomyositis □ Inclusion body myositis □ Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy □ Juvenile dermatomyositis □ Juvenile polymyositis □ Other diagnosis, specify diagnosis below □ Not Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (IIM) Not Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy (Not IIM), □ Becker´s dystrophy adults or children, but in which the diagnosis of □ Duchenne´s dystrophy idiopathic myositis was considered in the differential □ Fascioscapulohumeral dystrophy diagnosis □ Limb-girdle dystrophy □ Myotonic dystrophy □ Non-inflammatory inclusion body myopathy □ Other dystrophy, specify diagnosis □ Dysferlinopathy □ Acid maltase deficiency □ Allergies □ Bacterial myopathy □ Carnitine deficiency □ Celiac disease □ Crohn’s disease □ Cushing syndrome □ Cysticerosis □ Diabetes mellitus □ Drug or toxin associated myopathy, specify 4 diagnosis □ Exogenous steroid myopathy □ Familial periodic paralysis □ Fibromyalgia □ Filiarisis □ Glucocorticoid induced myopathy □ Gullain-Barre syndrome □ Hypercalcemia □ Hypereosinophilic syndrome □ Hypersensitivity conditions □ Hyperthyroidism □ Hypocalcemia □ Hypokalemia □ Hypothyroidism □ Immune mediated skin conditions, specify diagnosis below □ Juvenile idiopathic arthritis □ Kearns-Sayre syndrome □ Mc Ardle´s disease □ Metabolic myopathy, specify diagnosis □ Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, stroke (MELAS) □ Mitochondrial myopathy, specify diagnosis □ Mixed connective tissue disease □ Motor neuron diseases, specify diagnosis □ Multiple sclerosis □ Myasthenia gravis □ Myoadenylate deaminase deficiency □ Myoclonic epilepsy, ragged red fibers (MERRF) □ Palmityltransferase deficiency □ Parasitic myopathy □ Phosphofructokinase deficiency □ Psoriasis □ Seborhheic dermatitis □ Statin induced myopathy □ Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) □ Systemic sclerosis □ Systemic vasculitis, specify diagnosis below □ Toxoplasmosis □ Trichinosis □ Trypanasoma □ Ulcerative colitis □ Verrucae vulgaris □ Viral myopathy □ Other dermatologic disease, specify diagnosis below □ Other endocrine myopathy, specify diagnosis □ Other infectious myopathy, specify diagnosis □ Other neuromuscular disease, specify diagnosis below □ Other systemic autoimmune disease, specify diagnosis below □ Other diagnosis, specify □ None applicable (Inflammatory Myopathy) Basis for study diagnosis (check all supporting □ Muscle weakness reasons) □ Muscle biopsy abnormalities □ Elevated muscle enzymes □ EMG abnormalities □ Rashes 5 □ Skin biopsy □ Autoantibodies □ MRI □ Other, please specify Other diagnoses in this case: (check all that apply) □ Non applicable □ Systemic sclerosis □ Sjögren´s syndrome □ Mixed connective tissue disease □ Rheumatoid arthritis □ Systemic lupus erythematosus □ Hypothyroidism □ Hyperthyroidism □ Type I diabetes □ Juvenile idiopathic arthritis □ Malignancy □ Other, please specify Clinical Muscle Variables – present at any time during the disease course 1M. Objective symmetric weakness, usually □ Present progressive, of the proximal upper extremities □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 2M, Objective shoulder abductor weakness □ Present □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 3M. Objective elbow flexor weakness □ Present □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 4M. Objective elbow extensor weakness □ Present □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 5M. Wrist and finger flexors are relatively weaker □ Present than shoulder abductors on the same side □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 6M. Wrist flexors are relatively weaker than wrist □ Present extensors on the same side □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 7M. Objective finger flexor weakness □ Present □ Absent □ Information not available □ Comments 8M. Objective
Recommended publications
  • Muscle Imaging 17 William Palmer and M
    Muscle Imaging 17 William Palmer and M. K. Jesse Learning Objectives 17.2 Imaging Modalities in Skeletal Muscle • Review the role of imaging in muscle diseases. Evaluation • Detect and classify acute muscle injury by imaging. Radiograph, while excellent for bone pathology, has limited • Review unique imaging features in idiopathic utility in the evaluation of muscle. Although the majority of infammatory myopathy. muscle pathology is occult on routine radiographic images, • Identify the imaging features of other common X-ray may be useful in a few conditions. Certain infamma- infectious, traumatic, and vascular muscle tory or autoimmune myopathy, for example, is characterized pathologies. by unique soft tissue calcifcations of which radiographs • Discuss the differential considerations in muscle may be the most reliable modality for detection. Magnetic lesions. resonance imaging and ultrasound offer excellent special resolution, allowing for the detailed evaluation of muscle microanatomy. Ultrasound offers an added beneft of dynamic imaging but is less sensitive than MRI for muscle edema and low-grade injury. Because of the superior sensi- 17.1 Introduction to Muscle Imaging tivity in detecting subtle injury, MR imaging evaluation is largely considered the diagnostic gold standard. Evaluation and characterization of skeletal muscle pathology is a frequently encountered indication for musculoskeletal imaging. Causes of muscle pathology are diverse and include 17.3 Traumatic Muscle Injuries traumatic, autoimmune, infectious, infammatory, neuro- logic, and neoplastic. Each etiology while dramatically dif- Muscle injury is common among athletes and poses a serious ferent in the pathophysiology may present with similar limitation to continued performance. The location and extent imaging features. An understanding of the subtle differences of a muscle injury has implications on the recovery and func- in imaging features between the pathologic conditions may tional outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Statin Myopathy: a Common Dilemma Not Reflected in Clinical Trials
    REVIEW CME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Readers will assess possible statin-induced myopathy in their patients on statins CREDIT GENARO FERNANDEZ, MD ERICA S. SPATZ, MD CHARLES JABLECKI, MD PAUL S. PHILLIPS, MD Internal Medicine Residency Program, Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Department of Neurosciences, University Director, Interventional Cardiology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City Program, Cardiovascular Disease Fellow, of California San Diego, La Jolla Department of Cardiology, Scripps Mercy Yale University School of Medicine, New Hospital, San Diego, CA Haven, CT Statin myopathy: A common dilemma not reflected in clinical trials ■■ ABSTRACT hen a patient taking a statin complains Wof muscle aches, is he or she experiencing Although statins are remarkably effective, they are still statin-induced myopathy or some other prob- underprescribed because of concerns about muscle toxic- lem? Should statin therapy be discontinued? Statins have proven efficacy in preventing ity. We review the aspects of statin myopathy that are 1 important to the primary care physician and provide a heart attacks and death, and they are the most guide for evaluating patients on statins who present with widely prescribed drugs worldwide. Neverthe- less, they remain underused, with only 50% of muscle complaints. We outline the differential diagnosis, those who would benefit from being on a statin the risks and benefits of statin therapy in patients with receiving one.2,3 In addition, at least 25% of possible toxicity, and the subsequent treatment options. adults who start taking statins stop taking them 4 ■■ by 6 months, and up to 60% stop by 2 years. KEY POINTS Patient and physician fears about myopathy There is little consensus on the definition of statin-in- remain a key reason for stopping.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Myositis Ossificans with Acetic Acid Phonophoresis: a Case Series Angela Bagnulo, BA, DC, FRCCSS(C)1 Robert Gringmuth, DC, FRCCSS(C), FCCPOR(C)2
    ISSN 0008-3194 (p)/ISSN 1715-6181 (e)/2014/353–360/$2.00/©JCCA 2014 Treatment of Myositis Ossificans with acetic acid phonophoresis: a case series Angela Bagnulo, BA, DC, FRCCSS(C)1 Robert Gringmuth, DC, FRCCSS(C), FCCPOR(C)2 Objective: To create awareness of myositis ossificans Objectif : Sensibilisation à la myosite ossifiante (MO) (MO) as a potential complication of muscle contusion comme complication possible de contusions musculaires by presenting its clinical presentation and diagnostic grâce à la présentation de son tableau clinique et de features. An effective method of treatment is offered for ses symptômes. Une méthode efficace de traitement est those patients who develop traumatic MO. offerte pour les patients qui sont atteints de myosite Management: Patients in this case series developed ossifiante traumatique. traumatic MO, confirmed on diagnostic ultrasound. Traitement : Les patients de cette série de cas Patients participated in a treatment regimen consisting souffrent de myosite ossifiante traumatique, confirmée of phonophoresis of acetic acid with ultrasound. par échographie. Les patients ont participé à un régime Outcome: In all cases, a trial of phonophoresis de traitement consistant en une irrigation d’acide therapy significantly decreased patient signs, symptoms acétique par phonophorèse. and the size of the calcification on diagnostic ultrasound Résultats : Dans tous les cas, un essai de traitement in most at a 4-week post diagnosis mark. par phonophorèse a diminué considérablement les Discussion: Due to the potential damage to the muscle signes et les symptômes des patients ainsi que la taille de and its function, that surgical excision carries; safe la calcification détectée par échographie dans la plupart effective methods of conservative treatment for MO are des cas 4 semaines après le diagnostic.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Recovery Time from the Initial Assessment of a Quadriceps Contusion Injury
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Alonso et al: Predicting recovery time from the initial assessment of a quadriceps contusion injury Predicting recovery time from the initial assessment of a quadriceps contusion injury Albert Alonso1, Phillip Hekeik2 and Roger Adams3 1Canterbury Bulldogs Rugby League Club, Sydney 2Private practice, Sydney 3The University of Sydney Six quadriceps contusion tests were evaluated for inter-rater reliability and ability to predict the recovery time of 100 injured rugby players. All subjects were treated with a standardised and disciplined treatment program incorporating cryokinetics and modified training. Muscle firmness ratings, thigh circumference and passive knee flexion range of movement (ROM) measurements, and the unilateral palpation, brush-swipe and tap tests were all found to have substantial to excellent reliability (range: 0.66-1.00). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that 64 per cent of the variance in the time taken to return to full training could be accounted for by an equation involving the uninjured-injured difference in knee range, relative firmness rating of the injured muscle, difference in circumferences at the suprapatellar border, being able to play on following injury and the time delay before starting treatment. [Alonso A, Hekeik P and Adams R (2000): Predicting recovery time from the initial assessment of a quadriceps contusion injury. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 46: 167-177] Key words: Contusions; Myositis; Predictive Value of Tests; Thigh Introduction horse injuries, are the result of a direct blow to the anterior thigh with high velocity compressive forces which are excessive (Young et al 1993, Zarins and Starkey and Ryan (1996) note that obtaining Ciullo 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • EM Guidemap - Myopathy and Myoglobulinuria
    myopathy EM guidemap - Myopathy and myoglobulinuria Click on any of the headings or subheadings to rapidly navigate to the relevant section of the guidemap Introduction General principles ● endocrine myopathy ● toxic myopathy ● periodic paralyses ● myoglobinuria Introduction - this short guidemap supplements the neuromuscular weakness guidemap and offers the reader supplementary information on myopathies, and a short section on myoglobulinuria - this guidemap only consists of a few brief checklists of "causes of the different types of myopathy" that an emergency physician may encounter in clinical practice when dealing with a patient with acute/subacute muscular weakness General principles - a myopathy is suggested when generalized muscle weakness involves large proximal muscle groups, especially around the shoulder and proximal girdle, and when the diffuse muscle weakness is associated with normal tendon reflexes and no sensory findings - a simple classification of myopathy:- Hereditary ● muscular dystrophies ● congenital myopathies http://www.homestead.com/emguidemaps/files/myopathy.html (1 of 13)8/20/2004 5:14:27 PM myopathy ● myotonias ● channelopathies (periodic paralysis syndromes) ● metabolic myopathies ● mitochondrial myopathies Acquired ● inflammatory myopathy ● endocrine myopathies ● drug-induced/toxic myopathies ● myopathy associated with systemic illness - a myopathy can present with fixed weakness (muscular dystrophy, inflammatory myopathy) or episodic weakness (periodic paralysis due to a channelopathy, metabolic myopathy
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Sciatic Nerve Injury Resulting from Myositis Ossificans Traumatica
    PM R 8 (2016) 484-487 www.pmrjournal.org Case Presentation Delayed Sciatic Nerve Injury Resulting From Myositis Ossificans Traumatica Zhe Guan, MS, Thomas J. Wilson, MD, Jon A. Jacobson, MD, Todd C. Hollon, MD, Lynda J.-S. Yang, MD, PhD Abstract A motorcyclist sustained multiple-system trauma, including a left buttock hematoma requiring decompression and evacuation. Presentation for severe hip pain and lower extremity weakness was delayed. Imaging revealed myositis ossificans traumatica compressing the sciatic nerve in the buttock. The patient underwent sciatic nerve decompression with resection of heterotopic calcification, resulting in improvement in pain and left lower extremity function. This case illustrates the contrast in differential diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury immediately posttrauma and that occurring in a slow, delayed fashion posttrauma. Myositis ossificans may be an underrecognized complication of trauma but should be considered in cases of delayed peripheral nerve injury after trauma. Introduction repair. His sacral and vertebral fractures were treated nonoperatively. During his hospital course, he was sus- Neurological deficits after peripheral nerve injury pected to have left gluteal compartment syndrome, a may occur either immediately due to direct injury at the rare disorder affecting 1 or more of the 3 anatomic site of impact or in a delayed fashion due to a variety of gluteal compartments: the gluteus maximus compart- processes that cause secondary insult, including hema- ment, the gluteus medius and minimus compartment, toma formation, delayed ischemia, or iatrogenic injury. and the tensor fasciae latae compartment. The disorder Pelvic trauma/fractures are associated with an typically presents with swelling, redness, and tender- increased risk of nerve injury, particularly to the sciatic ness over the buttock, ipsilateral hip pain, and sciatic nerve [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Disorders of the Contractile Structures 54
    Disorders of the contractile structures 54 CHAPTER CONTENTS and is felt as a sudden, painful ‘giving way’ at the front of the Extensor mechanism 713 thigh. Alternatively, the muscular lesion may result from a direct contusion during contact sports (judo or American foot- Quadriceps strains and contusions . 713 ball), known as ‘Charley Horse’. Adherent vastus intermedius . 714 Patients who suffer an acute quadriceps strain will usually Tendinous lesions about the patella . 714 know right away. They are typically involved in sports requiring Rupture of the quadriceps tendon . 718 kicking, jumping, or initiating a sudden change in direction while running. Frequently, a sharp pain is felt, associated with Lesions of the infrapatellar tendon . 718 a loss in function of the quadriceps. Sometimes pain will not Lesions of the insertion at the tibial tuberosity . 719 fully develop during the athlete’s activity while the thigh is Patellar fracture . 719 warm; consequently, the extent of the injury is underesti- Patellofemoral disorders 719 mated. Stiffness, disability and pain then set in some time Introduction . 719 afterwards, e.g. late at night, and the following morning the patient can walk only with a limp.1 Mechanical theory . 719 Clinical examination shows a normal hip and knee, although Neural theory . 720 passive knee flexion is painful or both painful and limited, Clinical examination . 720 depending on the size of the rupture. Resisted extension of the Clinical manifestations . 722 knee is painful and slightly weak. As a rule, the lesion is in the 2 Strained iliotibial band 724 rectus femoris, usually at mid-thigh level. The affected muscle belly is hard and tender over a large area.
    [Show full text]
  • Connective Tissue 5.2.04
    Other Connective Tissue Diseases Chester V. Oddis, MD Thomas A. Medsger, Jr, MD Arthur Weinstein, MD Contents 1. Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease 2. Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy 3. Scleroderma 4. Sjögren’s Syndrome 5. References OTHER CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES 1 1. Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease Table 1 The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has published criteria for several different diseases Clinical Features and Autoantibody Findings commonly referred to as connective tissue disease Possibly Specific for a Defined CTD (CTD). The primary aim of such classification crite - ria is to ensure the comparability among CTD stud - ies in the scientific community. These diseases Clinical Feature include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclero - sis (SSc), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Malar rash polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS). These are systemic Subacute cutaneous lupus rheumatic diseases which reflects their inflamma - tory nature and protean clinical manifestations with Sclerodermatous skin changes resultant tissue injury. Although there are unifying immunologic features that pathogenetically tie Heliotrope rash these separate CTDs to each other, the individual disorders often remain clinically and even serologi - Gottron’s papules cally distinct. Immunogenetic data and autoanti - body findings in the different CTDs lend further Erosive arthritis support for their distinctive identity and often serves to subset the individual CTD even further, as seen with the myositis syndromes, SLE and SSc. In other cases, it remains difficult to classify individuals Autoantibody with a combination of signs, symptoms, and labora - tory test results. It is this group of patients that have Anti-dsDNA an “undifferentiated” connective tissue disease (UCTD), or perhaps more accurately, an undifferen - Anti-Sm tiated systemic rheumatic disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupational Diseases
    OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES ОДЕСЬКИЙ ДЕРЖАВНИЙ МЕДИЧНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ THE ODESSA STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Áiáëiîòåêà ñòóäåíòà-ìåäèêà Medical Student’s Library Започатковано 1999 р. на честь 100-річчя Одеського державного медичного університету (1900–2000 рр.) Initiated in 1999 to mark the Centenary of the Odessa State Medical University (1900–2000) 1 OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES Recommended by the Central Methodical Committee for Higher Medical Education of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine as a manual for students of higher medical educational establishments of the IV level of accreditation using English Odessa The Odessa State Medical University 2009 BBC 54.1,7я73 UDC 616-057(075.8) Authors: O. M. Ignatyev, N. A. Matsegora, T. O. Yermolenko, T. P. Oparina, K. A. Yarmula, Yu. M. Vorokhta Reviewers: Professor G. A. Bondarenko, the head of the Department of Occupational Diseases and Radiation Medicine of the Donetzk Medical University named after M. Gorky, MD Professor I. F. Kostyuk, the head of the Department of Internal and Occupational Diseases of the Kharkiv State Medical University, MD This manual contains information about etiology, epidemiology, patho- genesis of occupational diseases, classifications, new methods of exami- nation, clinical forms and presentation, differential diagnosis, complica- tions and treatment. It includes the questions of prophylaxis, modern trends in treatment according to WHO adopted instructions, working capacity expert exam. The represented material is composed according to occupational dis- eases study programme and it is recommended for the students of higher medical educational establishments of the IV accreditation standard and doctors of various specialities. Рекомендовано Центральним методичним кабінетом з вищої медичної освіти МОЗ України як навчальний посібник для студентів вищих медичних навчальних закладів IV рівня акредитації, які опановують навчальну дисципліну англiйською мовою (Протокол № 4 від 24.12.2007 р.
    [Show full text]
  • Myositis Ossificans Progressiva
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.24.3.267 on 1 May 1965. Downloaded from Ann. rheum. Dis. (1965), 24, 267. MYOSITIS OSSIFICANS PROGRESSIVA BY E. FLETCHER AND M. S. MOSS From the Belfast City Hospital, Northern Ireland Myositis ossificans progressiva is a rare disease, inanition due to involvement of the masseter and and most observers have described only single cases temporalis muscles. Nevertheless, it is remarkable in their own experience. The most recent compre- that some of these patients have survived to middle hensive survey of the condition has been given by age or longer in spite of severe disablement, e.g. 51 Lutwak (1964), according to whom about 260 cases years at least in the case described by Koontz (1927) fitting the description of the disease have appeared and 61 years in a case described by Fairbank (1951). in the literature since about 1670. The aetiology of the disease remains unknown, but McKusick Clinical Features.-These can be conveniently copyright. (1960) considered that fundamental disorder resided considered under two headings. in connective tissue, and he adopted the name (.1) Congenital anomalies of the skeleton are fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, a terminology important, for they can be recognized at birth or first suggested by Bauer and Bode (1940). Never- before ectopic ossification makes the diagnosis theless the term "myositis" remains firmly estab- obvious. Helferich (1879) first pointed out the lished in the literature, although involvement of association of microdactyly with the condition. muscle fibres occurs only in a secondary fashion. The great toe is most frequently affected, the thumb http://ard.bmj.com/ McKusick (1960) included the disease among the in about half the cases, and at times other digits likely hereditary disorders of connective tissue (McKusick, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • MRI of Muscle Injury
    MRI OF MUSCLE INJURIES Robert Downey Boutin, M.D. Medical Director, Med-Tel International Skeletal muscle is the single largest tissue in the body, making up 25-50% of one’s total body weight. As radiologists, we image many of the body’s 434 muscles each day -- both intentionally and incidentally. When evaluating the health of muscle, our most sophisticated radiological technique is MRI [1-2]. In this session, we review four topics that aid in understanding and diagnosing injuries of muscle: [I] normal anatomy; [II] MRI indications and technique; [III] pathological conditions; and [IV] differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls. I. NORMAL ANATOMY ORGANIZATION OF MUSCLE Muscle is a complex organ. The basic structural element of skeletal muscle is the muscle fiber. These fibers are grouped into fascicles, and the fascicles are grouped into muscles. Muscles, in turn, are arranged into compartments that are bounded by connective tissue termed fascia. Fascia plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of certain muscle disorders (e.g., compartment syndrome, fascial herniation) and influences the extent of others (e.g., spread of tumor and infection). COMPARTMENTS Given that there are hundreds of muscles in the body, the easiest way to conceptualize the location and function of muscles is to become familiar with compartmental anatomy. For example, in the mid-thigh, three compartments are present: anterior (quadriceps and sartorius); posterior (hamstrings); and medial (adductors and gracilis). Four compartments are present in the leg: anterior; lateral; superficial posterior; and deep posterior. II. MRI INDICATIONS & TECHNIQUE INDICATIONS Muscle disorders have a wide variety of causes, treatments, and prognoses.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Rheumatology Author: Liz Tatman © Dr R
    Notes on Rheumatology Author: Liz Tatman Musculoskeletal (MSK) Problems: Principles of Management MSK symptoms Pain – site, radiation (get radiation distally, more common with more proximal joints e.g. shoulder and knee), quality (shooting with nerve entrapment). Onset. With usage (mechanical), at rest (inflammatory) or at night (if no relation to movement concern about bony mets). Bony pain – well localised, doesn’t radiate, progressive, night predominant, not related to movement, due to fractures, neoplasia, Paget’s disease, osteomalacia, osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis. Referred pain – poorly localised, diffuse, improved by rubbing. Can get neuropathic pain sometime after injury. Stress pain – in tight pack positions, if in all directions suggests synovitis. Stiffness – prolonged early morning and inactivity imply inflammatory cause. Swelling and deformity. Instability Locking – sudden inability to move joint, usually painful but transient, post unlocking discomfort. Affects hinge joints (knee, elbow, TMJ). Mechanical problem e.g. synovium, cartilage, split meniscus. Loss of function, disability and handicap. Systemic illness – night sweats, malaise, fatigue, weight loss suggest inflammatory process. Sleep disturbance. Red flags: progressive, well localised progressive night-predominant pain (mets), red hot joint (sepsis), sequential joint involvement (spreading sepsis). History – need to determine if traumatic or non-traumatic, ask about dominant hand. Trauma – time, place, mechanism (twist, blow, crush), magnitude of force, direction of force, first aid, immediate symptoms and progression, previous injuries. Non-trauma – rule out (RESTIT) Referred pain, Embolus, Sepsis, Tumour, Ischaemia, Thrombosis. Systems enquiry for non MSK causes, associated features, drug toxicity, pre-op assessment and involvement of other organs. Especially general malaise (anaemia), hot and shivery (infection), skin (rashes, psoriasis, Raynaud’s), eyes (iritis, scleritis).
    [Show full text]