DOCSLIB.ORG

National DNA Databases 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National DNA Databases 2011 NATIONAL FORENSIC DNA DATABASES COUNCIL FOR RESPONSIBLE GENETICS ANDREW D. THIBEDEAU, J.D. SENIOR FELLOW National DNA Databases 2011 National Forensic DNA Databases Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. - 5 - Summary Table ..................................................................................................................... - 5 - Laws on Point ...................................................................................................................... - 10 - Entry Criteria ...................................................................................................................... - 13 - Introduction & Trends ........................................................................................................... - 15 - National Status Reports Part I - Operational DNA Databases ........................................... - 19 - Australia............................................................................................................................... - 20 - Austria .................................................................................................................................. - 24 - Bahrain................................................................................................................................. - 27 - Belarus ................................................................................................................................. - 28 - Belgium ................................................................................................................................ - 29 - Botswana .............................................................................................................................. - 32 - Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................ - 33 - Canada ................................................................................................................................. - 35 - China (Hong Kong) ............................................................................................................. - 37 - Colombia .............................................................................................................................. - 42 - Croatia ................................................................................................................................. - 44 - Cyprus .................................................................................................................................. - 61 - Czech Republic .................................................................................................................... - 63 - Denmark .............................................................................................................................. - 65 - Egypt .................................................................................................................................... - 67 - Estonia .................................................................................................................................. - 68 - Finland ................................................................................................................................. - 70 - France................................................................................................................................... - 73 - FYR Macedonia .................................................................................................................. - 77 - Germany .............................................................................................................................. - 78 - Hungary ............................................................................................................................... - 82 - Iceland .................................................................................................................................. - 84 - Iran ....................................................................................................................................... - 88 - Israel ..................................................................................................................................... - 89 - Jamaica ................................................................................................................................ - 90 - Japan .................................................................................................................................... - 91 - - 2 - COUNCIL FOR RESPONSIBLE GENETICS National Forensic DNA Databases Jordan .................................................................................................................................. - 94 - Korea (Rep. of) .................................................................................................................... - 95 - Kuwait .................................................................................................................................. - 96 - Latvia ................................................................................................................................... - 97 - Lithuania .............................................................................................................................. - 99 - Luxembourg ...................................................................................................................... - 101 - Malaysia ............................................................................................................................. - 104 - Morocco ............................................................................................................................. - 109 - Netherlands ........................................................................................................................ - 110 - New Zealand ...................................................................................................................... - 114 - Norway ............................................................................................................................... - 115 - Panama............................................................................................................................... - 119 - Poland................................................................................................................................. - 122 - Portugal .............................................................................................................................. - 126 - Romania ............................................................................................................................. - 128 - Saudi Arabia ...................................................................................................................... - 132 - Singapore ........................................................................................................................... - 133 - Slovakia .............................................................................................................................. - 139 - Slovenia .............................................................................................................................. - 141 - South Africa ....................................................................................................................... - 143 - Spain ................................................................................................................................... - 154 - Sweden ............................................................................................................................... - 156 - Switzerland ........................................................................................................................ - 158 - Tunisia ................................................................................................................................ - 160 - UK....................................................................................................................................... - 161 - Ukraine............................................................................................................................... - 169 - United Arab Emirates....................................................................................................... - 171 - United States ...................................................................................................................... - 172 - National Status Reports Part II – Planned DNA Databases ............................................. - 175 - Albania ............................................................................................................................... - 176 - Algeria ................................................................................................................................ - 178 - Bahamas ............................................................................................................................. - 179 - Barbados ............................................................................................................................ - 180 - Bosnia & Herzegovina ...................................................................................................... - 183 - -
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Family Tree Dna Complaints
    Family Tree Dna Complaints If palladous or synchronal Zeus usually atrophies his Shane wadsets haggishly or beggar appealingly and soberly, how Peronist is Kaiser? Mongrel and auriferous Bradford circlings so paradigmatically that Clifford expatiates his dischargers. Ropier Carter injects very indigestibly while Reed remains skilful and topfull. Family finder results will receive an answer Of torch the DNA testing companies FamilyTreeDNA does not score has strong marks from its users In summer both 23andMe and AncestryDNA score. Sent off as a tree complaints about the aclu attorney vera eidelman wrote his preteen days you hand parts to handle a tree complaints and quickly build for a different charts and translation and. Family Tree DNA Reviews Legit or Scam Reviewopedia. Want to family tree dna family tree complaints. Everything about new england or genetic information contained some reason or personal data may share dna family complaints is the results. Family Tree DNA 53 Reviews Laboratory Testing 1445 N. It yourself help to verify your family modest and excellent helpful clues to inform. A genealogical relationship is integrity that appears on black family together It's documented by how memory and traditional genealogical research. These complaints are dna family complaints. The private history website Ancestrycom is selling a new DNA testing service called AncestryDNA But the DNA and genetic data that Ancestrycom collects may be. Available upon request to family tree dna complaints about family complaints and. In the authors may be as dna family tree complaints and visualise the mixing over the match explanation of your genealogy testing not want organized into the raw data that is less.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): the Second Generation of DNA Analysis Methods Takes the Stand, 9 Santa Clara High Tech
    Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal Volume 9 | Issue 1 Article 8 January 1993 The olP ymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): The Second Generation of DNA Analysis Methods Takes the Stand Kamrin T. MacKnight Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kamrin T. MacKnight, The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): The Second Generation of DNA Analysis Methods Takes the Stand, 9 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 287 (1993). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol9/iss1/8 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR): THE SECOND GENERATION OF DNA ANALYSIS METHODS TAKES THE STAND Kamrin T. MacKnightt TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................... 288 BASIC GENETICS AND DNA REPLICATION ................. 289 FORENSIC DNA ANALYSIS ................................ 292 Direct Sequencing ....................................... 293 Restriction FragmentLength Polymorphism (RFLP) ...... 294 Introduction .......................................... 294 Technology ........................................... 296 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) ....................... 300 H istory ............................................... 300 Technology ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Codis Dna Database
    INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY FORENSIC SERVICES AGENCY Doctor Dennis J. Nicholas Institute of Forensic Science 40 SOUTH ALABAMA STREET INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 PHONE (317) 327-3670 FAX (317) 327-3607 Michael Medler Laboratory Director Evidence Submission Guideline #7 CODIS DNA DATABASE The Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) is a computer database of DNA profiles used to solve crimes across the United States. In Indiana, DNA profiles obtained from the following categories can be entered into CODIS by the Indianapolis Marion County Forensic Services Agency: crime scene evidence, missing persons and unidentified human remains. The purpose of the database is to generate investigative leads. Not all cases are considered CODIS eligible. CODIS is maintained at the national level by the Federal Bureau of Investigation which has requirements to determine the eligibility of a DNA profile for CODIS entry. A continued “life of crime” or the high incidence of recidivism in criminals is the concept upon which the DNA database program is based. If a convicted offender’s profile matches crime scene evidence, this can identify a potential suspect(s). The database can also link multiple unsolved crimes to identify serial offenses and connect agencies who can then work together in the investigation. Finally, CODIS can be used to identify human remains by matching them to missing persons or to their biological relatives. To maximize the value of this program, biological evidence from unsolved crimes and missing persons cases must be analyzed and the DNA profile developed is entered into CODIS. I. NO SUSPECT/UNSOLVED CASES A. All unsolved cases with potential probative DNA qualifying case evidence, including those with no suspects, should be submitted to the Indianapolis-Marion County Forensic Services Agency (IMCFSA) for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Police National DNA Database: Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy
    The Police National DNA Database: Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy A Report by GeneWatch UK The Police National DNA Database: Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy. A Report for GeneWatch UK by Kristina Staley January 2005 The Mill House, Manchester Road, Tideswell, Buxton Derbyshire, SK17 8LN, UK GeneWatch Phone: 01287 871898 Fax: 01298 872531 E-mail: [email protected] UK Website: www.genewatch.org Acknowledgements GeneWatch would like to thank Jan van Aken, Sarah Sexton and Paul Johnson for their helpful comments on a draft of this report. Kristina Staley would also like to thank Val Sales for her help in preparing the report. The content of the final report remains the responsibility of GeneWatch UK. Cover photograph DNA genetic fingerprinting on fingerprint blue backdrop. © Adam Hart-Davis, http://www.adam-hart-davis.org/ GeneWatch UK 2 January 2005 Contents 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................................5 2 Introduction...........................................................................................................................10 3 What is the National DNA Database?..................................................................................11 3.1 Using DNA to identify individuals...................................................................................11 3.2 How the police use DNA................................................................................................12 3.3 Concerns
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Identifiability of DNA Database Entries
    Student Paper Finalist In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium. pp 547-551. Nov 2000. Determining the Identifiability of DNA Database Entries Bradley Malin 1 and Latanya Sweeney 2 1Department of Biological Sciences 2School of Computer Science and Heinz School of Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania CleanGene is a software program that helps determine The rise in genetic data and resulting the identifiability of sequenced DNA, independent of databases have a variety of uses in genetic and any explicit demographics or identifiers maintained molecular biology research, including the ability to with the DNA. The program computes the likelihood determine hotspots of mutation in genes and familial that the release of DNA database entries could be studies. Despite the considerable amount of basic and related to specific individuals that are the subjects of clinical research that may benefit from the availability the data. The engine within CleanGene relies on of such data, care must be taken when such data are publicly available health care data and on knowledge population based. The issue of genetic privacy is of of particular diseases to help relate identified utmost concern and must be addressed in terms of what individuals to DNA entries. Over 20 diseases, ranging information can be leaked before population based over ataxias, blood diseases, and sex-linked mutations DNA data is shared. are accounted for, with 98-100% of individuals found identifiable. We assume the genetic material is BACKGROUND released in a linear sequencing format from an individual’s genome. CleanGene and its related To facilitate radical increases in human experiments are useful tools for any institution seeking genetic research information and expedite scientific to provide anonymous genetic material for research discovery, the National Center for Biotechnology purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • National DNA Databases—Practice and Practicability. a Forum for Discussion
    International Congress Series 1261 (2004) 1–8 www.ics-elsevier.com National DNA databases—practice and practicability. A forum for discussion Peter D. Martin* Ex-Metropolitan Police Laboratory, London, La Borderie, 87440 Saint Mathieu, France Abstract. The success of the established National DNA databases (NDNAD) in linking crimes and nominating possible suspects has prompted many countries to enact legislation for the introduction of their own databases. While the technology used in the production of the DNA profiles remains consistent (there is a core set of STR loci common to all laboratories), there is considerable variation in the regulations which cover the entry of personal profiles. Five invited speakers presented the current situation with NDNADs in Europe and North America. The presentations included: (1) the various categories of crime for which a profile can be entered onto a database; (2) the numbers of profiles held on the databases; (3) whether the DNA samples can be retained for future analysis; (4) the successes of the various databases; (5) the interaction between the operators of the databases and other elements of the criminal justice systems. There were also discussions of the possible future technological developments that may affect the databases and a cautionary note on the quality measures necessary to ensure accuracy of analysis and database management and the potential for the misuse of the data retained. D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: National DNA database; DNA profile; STR multiplexes 1. Introduction DNA databases for criminal offenders and unsolved crimes have now become established in many countries as an everyday tool for use in the investigation of crime.
    [Show full text]
  • 23Policemenandme: Analyzing the Constitutional Implications of Police Use of Commercial Dna Databases
    23POLICEMENANDME: ANALYZING THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF POLICE USE OF COMMERCIAL DNA DATABASES Evan Frohman∗ INTRODUCTION In 1984, the English scientist Alec Jeffery discovered the variable DNA markers that exist within every person.1 Within a year, the English police became the first law enforcement agency to use DNA’s identification capabilities to successfully catch a criminal. 2 The technique crossed the pond to the United States and was soon followed by the creation of a national DNA profile database in 1990.3 At first, the database was just for sex offenders. Then it was for all felons, then convicted criminals, and now even arrestees. 4 Additionally, some local DNA databases, which lack the regulations and restrictions that federal law imposes on the national database, include witnesses, victims, family members of victims, and helpful citizens who responded to DNA dragnets.5 This power creep has continued as law enforcement agencies expand the DNA identification technique’s reach ever further with the implementation of familial searches, which capture individuals 6 with genetic relation to a DNA profile in the database. ∗ J.D. 2020, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School; B.A. Political Science, Legal Studies, Economics, 2016, Northwestern University. Special thanks to Professor David Rudovsky, Dr. Stella Tsirka, Dr. Michael Frohman, (soon to be Dr.) Maddie O’Brien, and the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law for their support and wisdom. Sorry Mom, this is the closest I’m getting to science. 1 The History of Genetic Fingerprinting, U. OF LEICESTER, https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/ genetics/jeffreys/history-gf (last visited Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DUTCH FOCUS on DNA in the CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: NET-WIDENING of JUDICIAL DATA John A
    THE DUTCH FOCUS ON DNA IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: NET-WIDENING OF JUDICIAL DATA John A. E. Vervaele, F.C.W. de Graaf et N. Tielemans ERES | « Revue internationale de droit pénal » 2012/3 Vol. 83 | pages 459 à 480 Document téléchargé depuis www.cairn.info - University of Utrecht 131.211.104.202 03/05/2019 17h11. © ERES ISSN 0223-5404 ISBN 9782749236353 Article disponible en ligne à l'adresse : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-penal-2012-3-page-459.htm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour ERES. © ERES. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit. Document téléchargé depuis www.cairn.info - University of Utrecht 131.211.104.202 03/05/2019 17h11. © ERES Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 101-200.qxp:RIDP vierge par 100 qxp 21/05/13 19:18 Page113 THE DUTCH FOCUS ON DNA IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: NET-WIDENING OF JUDICIAL DATA! J.A.E. VERVAELE, F.C.W. DE GRAAF & N. TIELEMANS! Document téléchargé depuis www.cairn.info - University of Utrecht 131.211.104.202 03/05/2019 17h11.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Audit of Legislative Frameworks Within the European
    A comparative audit of legislative frameworks within the European Union for the collection, retention and use of forensic DNA profiles Kristiina Reed Denise Syndercombe Court Kristiina Reed Dr. Denise Syndercombe-Court King’s College London 150 Stamford Street London, SE1 9nH, UK [email protected] [email protected] © Copyright remains with the authors The work leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 285487 (EUROFORGEN- NoE). London, UK, August 2014 (updated in June 2016) 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Austria ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Belgium .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Bulgaria........................................................................................................................................ 11 Croatia ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Cyprus .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Czech Republic ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic DNA Analysis
    FOCUS: FORENSIC SCIENCE Forensic DNA Analysis JESSICA MCDONALD, DONALD C. LEHMAN LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Television shows such as CSI: Crime Scene 1. Discuss the important developments in the history Investigation, Law and Order, Criminal Minds, and of DNA profiling. many others portray DNA analysis as a quick and 2. Compare and contrast restriction fragment length simple process. However, these portrayals are not polymorphism and short tandem repeat analyses in accurate. Since the discovery of DNA as the genetic the area of DNA profiling. material in 1953, much progress has been made in the Downloaded from 3. Describe the structure of short tandem repeats and area of forensic DNA analysis. Despite how much we their alleles. have learned about DNA and DNA analysis (Table 1), 4. Identify the source of DNA in a blood sample. our knowledge of DNA profiling can be enhanced 5. Discuss the importance of the amelogenin gene in leading to better and faster results. This article will DNA profiling. discuss the history of forensic DNA testing, the current 6. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of science, and what the future might hold. http://hwmaint.clsjournal.ascls.org/ mitochondrial DNA analysis in DNA profiling. 7. Describe the type of DNA profiles used in the Table 1. History of DNA Profiling Combined DNA Index System. 8. Compare the discriminating power of DNA 1953 Franklin, Watson, and Crick discover structure of DNA 1983 Kary Mullis develops PCR procedure, ultimately winning profiling and blood typing. Nobel Prize in Science in 1993
    [Show full text]
  • DNA and Its Privacy
    DNA and Its Privacy The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Coodly, Lavanya R. 2019. DNA and Its Privacy. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42006723 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA DNA and Its Privacy Lavanya Coodly A Thesis in the Field of Legal Studies for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2019 Copyright 2019 Lavanya Coodly Abstract [W]e can’t go anywhere without leaving a bread-crumb trail of identifying DNA matter. If we have no legitimate expectation of privacy in such bodily material, what possible impediment can there be to having the government collect what we leave behind, extract its DNA signature and enhance CODIS to include everyone? —Judge Alex Kozinski, dissenting in United States v. Kincade When you’ve licked a stamp on your tax return you’ve sent the government a DNA sample. —Victor Weedn, Head of Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory When we visit a doctor’s office and leave samples of blood or urine, sip a drink out of a glass in a restaurant, comb our hair, or visit a salon or a spa, it turns out that we are inadvertently leaving behind traces of our DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Panopticon: Genetic Genealogy Searches and the Fourth Amendment
    Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Volume 18 Issue 3 Article 2 Spring 5-30-2021 THE GENETIC PANOPTICON: GENETIC GENEALOGY SEARCHES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Genevieve Carter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip Part of the Fourth Amendment Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Genevieve Carter, THE GENETIC PANOPTICON: GENETIC GENEALOGY SEARCHES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 18 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 311 (2021). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol18/iss3/2 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. NORTHWESTER N J O U R N A L OF TECHNOLOG Y AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y THE GENETIC PANOPTICON: GENETIC GENEALOGY SEARCHES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Genevieve Carter May 2021 VOL. 18, NO. 3 © 2021 by Genevieve Carter Copyright May 2021 by Genevieve Carter Volume 18, Number 3 (May 2021) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property THE GENETIC PANOPTICON: GENETIC GENEALOGY SEARCHES AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Genevieve Carter ABSTRACT— I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 311 II. TRADITIONAL DNA DATABASE SEARCH VERSUS FAMILIAL DNA SEARCHES ....... 313 A. CODIS
    [Show full text]