DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Real Property Distinctions Professor Zachary Kramer Arizona State University College of Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Real Property Distinctions Professor Zachary Kramer Arizona State University College of Law TEXAS REAL PROPERTY DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ZACHARY KRAMER ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW CHAPTER 1: OWNERSHIP (PRESENT ESTATES AND CONCURRENT OWNERSHIP) The primary goal of this lesson is to highlight the key differences between real property law in general and real property law in Texas. The secondary goal of this lesson is to reinforce your understanding of some of the core concepts of property law. We start with the forms of ownership, which consists of three interrelated topics: • Present Estates • Concurrent Estates • Future Interests Keep in mind that real property is alienable, which means it can be _______________________. Common methods of transfer are sale, gift, devise, and ________________________________. In a transfer of real property, the seller/donor is called ______________________________ and the buyer/recipient is called the _________________________________. A. Present Estates A present estate gives the owner the ________________________________ to currently _____________________________ the property. Note 1: An owner need not actually use or occupy the property. The important point is that the owner has the right to possess the property. 1. Fee Simple Absolute The fee simple absolute is the _________________________________ ownership interest recognized by law and therefore, not surprisingly, the most common form of ownership of real property. o Alienable—Freely alienable, which means the owner can easily transfer the property o Duration—Has an infinite duration, which means it’s capable of lasting _____________________________ o Creation—At common law, a grantor needed to use particular words of limitation to create a fee simple absolute: “and his/her heirs.” . Texas Distinction: In Texas, conveyances that are ambiguous are considered a fee simple unless 1) the conveyance is ________________________________________ or a _____________________________________ is created. Example 1: O conveys Blackacre “to A.” At common law, this would not have created a fee simple absolute. Under Texas law, however, a fee simple is created. Example 2: O conveys Blackacre “to A for life.” This would not create a fee simple absolute under Texas law because the words of limitation (“for life”) create a lesser estate. o Future Interest—No future interest associated with a fee simple absolute. 2. Defeasible Fees A fee simple can also be made to be defeasible, which means it may be ____________________________________ by the occurrence of an event. o Fee Simple Determinable—A fee simple that is limited by specific ___________________________________ language. Classic examples of duration are “so long as,” “while,” “during,” “until,” etc. The future interest associated with a fee simple determinable is a possibility of reverter. This future interest is held by the ___________________________ and it vests _______________________________________ once the durational period ends. Example 3: O conveys Blackacre “to A and her heirs so long as the land is farmed.” A acquires a fee simple determinable and O retains a possibility of reverter. If A or her heirs ever stops farming the land, title will vest automatically in O or O’s heirs. o Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent—A fee simple that is limited by specific ______________________________________ language. Classic examples include “provided that,” “on the condition that,” “but if,” etc. The future interest associated with a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent is a right of entry. This future interest is held by the ___________________________ and it does not vest automatically. A grantor must exercise her right to re-enter the property. Example 4: O conveys Blackacre “to A and her heirs, but if the land isn’t used as a farm, O may re-enter and re-take. A acquires a fee simple subject to condition subsequent and O retains a right of entry. If A stops farming the land, O must exercise the right to re- take in order to take possession of Blackacre. o Fee simple Subject to Executory Interest—A fee simple that will end upon the happening of an event and the future interest will vest in ________________________________________, i.e. someone other than the grantor or the grantee. 2 | © 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC | TX Real Property Distinctions . The future interest associated with this fee simple is an executory interest. An executory interest vests automatically. Example 5: O conveys Blackacre “to A and her heirs, but if liquor is served on the premises, then to C and her heirs. A has a fee simple subject to executory limitation and C has an executory interest. 3. Life Estate o A life estate is a present estate that is limited to ___________________________ duration. The lifetime can be measured against the grantee’s lifetime or a third-party’s lifetime. Example 6: O conveys Blackacre “to A for life.” This life estate will end at A’s death. Example 7: O conveys Blackacre “to A for B’s life.” A has the life estate, which is measured against B’s life. This is known as a life estate pur autre vie. o Creation—Most life estates are created with the words of limitation “for life.” Example 8: O conveys Blackacre “to A for life.” A has a life estate. Texas Distinction: No ___________________________________________________ to create a life estate. Example 9: O conveys Blackacre “to A until her death.” In Texas, this will create a life estate in A. o Future Interest—The future interests associated with the life estate are the ___________________________ and the __________________________________. o Waste—Although a life tenant has the right to occupy and use the property, the life tenant cannot use the property in such a way as to cause a decrease in the value of the property. The future interest holders can enter the property to inspect for waste, or bring suit to obtain damages or an injunction to prevent such waste. B. Concurrent Estates A concurrent estate is ownership or possession of real property by two or more persons _______________________________________. 1. Tenancy in Common—The _______________________ concurrent interest. o Tenants in common have equal rights to posses or use the property. o No ________________________________________________ exists. This means that each tenant can transfer her interest individually, even at death. o Presumption that a conveyance to two or more people creates a tenancy in common. TX Real Property Distinctions | © 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC | 3 2. Joint Tenancy—A concurrent estate where two or more individuals own property with the ___________________________________________________ o Four Unities (“PITT”)—There are four unities necessary to have a joint tenancy: . Possession: Each joint tenant must have an equal right to possess or use the property. Interest: Each joint tenant must have an equal interest. Time: Each joint tenant must acquire their interest at the same time. Title: Each joint tenant must acquire their interest in the same instrument. Note: If any unity is broken, then joint tenancy is severed and becomes a _________________________________________. o Texas Distinction: Unlike most states, a joint tenancy in Texas does not automatically include a right of survivorship. Instead, joint tenants can create a right of survivorship by __________________________________ agreeing to allow their interests to pass under a right of survivorship. 3. Tenancy by the Entirety—A joint tenancy between _______________________________ persons. Includes a right of survivorship o Texas Distinction: Because it is a _____________________________________________ jurisdiction, Texas does not recognize the tenancy by the entirety. CHAPTER 2: FUTURE INTERESTS • Future Interest: An interest in property that gives the owner the right to possess the property in the future. • A couple key features: o Present vs. Future—Though it concerns the future, a future interest is a presently-existing right. o Possession—Like with present estates, future interests are concerned with the owner’s right to ________________________________ the property. A. Grantor Interests • Reversion—Future interest held by the _______________________________ after the grantor conveys a life estate or an estate for years but does not convey the balance to a third party. Note that the reversion is not subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities. Example 10: O conveys Blackacre “to A for five years.” A has a term of years; O retains a reversion. • Possibility of Reverter—Future interest held by the ________________________________ following a fee simple determinable. 4 | © 2017 Themis Bar Review, LLC | TX Real Property Distinctions Example 11: O conveys Blackacre “to A so long as the property is used for commercial purposes.” O retains a possibility of reverter. o Texas Distinction: Texas does not have a statute that limits the duration of the possibility of reverter. Note also that the possibility of reverter is not subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities. • Right of Entry—Future interest held by the _______________________________ following a fee simple subject to condition subsequent. Example 12: O conveys Blackacre “to A and her heirs, but if liquor is served on the premises, O can re-enter and re-take. O retains a right of entry. Texas Distinction: Texas does not have a statute that limits the duration of the right of entry. Note also that the right of reentry is not subject to the Rule Against Perpetuities. B. Grantee Interests • Remainder—A future interest held by a ______________________________ that is capable of becoming possessory upon the natural expiration of a prior possessory estate. o Vested Remainder—An interest that is: 1. Given to an ___________________________________________________ grantee, and 2. That is not subject to a ____________________________________________________. Example 13: O conveys Blackacre “to A for life, then to B and her heirs.” B has a vested remainder. B is ascertained and B does not have to satisfy any condition in order to take the interest. Vested Subject to Open—An interest given to a class of grantees and at least one member of the class has ______________________________________________. Example 14: O conveys Blackacre “to A for life, then to A’s children who reach 21.” A has three kids—B is 25, C is 18, and D is 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1400 Co Ownership and Condominium
    1400 CO-OWNERSHIP AND CONDOMINIUM Marshall E. Tracht Associate Professor, Hofstra University School of Law © Copyright 1999 Marshall E. Tracht Abstract Co-ownership refers to legal relations in which two or more entities have equal rights to the use and enjoyment of property. Co-ownership relationships may satisfy the preferences of some owners, and predefined categories of co-ownership, as opposed to contractually defined relations, may allow parties to satisfy these preferences at relatively low cost. However, shared ownership results in coordination and externality problems, which the law attempts to mitigate in numerous ways, including judicial oversight of ‘reasonableness’ (as in the law of waste) or fiduciary duties; ending the co-ownership relation (through the right of partition) or providing rules that seek to optimize the joint decision-making process (such as compulsory unitization). A major area of growth in shared ownership is in condominium developments, where entities own some property individually, while co-owning common facilities. This permits parties to take advantage of economies of scale and the joint provision of common goods. Condominium arrangements are governed by a combination of contract, statute and judicial law, and typically include democratic decision-making structures intended to minimize the sum of decision-making costs (gathering information, voting, and bargaining) and the cost of erroneous decisions. JEL classification: K11, P32, H41 Keywords: Cotenancy, Co-ownership, Condiminium, Cooperative, Communal Ownership 1. Introduction Co-ownership refers to legal relationships that entitle two or more entities to equal rights to the use and enjoyment of property. Although it most often arises in the context of real property, co-ownership may apply to any type of property.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights
    Fordham Law Review Volume 55 Issue 2 Article 2 1986 An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights Samuel M. Fetters Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuel M. Fetters, An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 173 (1986). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol55/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights Cover Page Footnote * Professor of Law, Syracuse University. I wish to thank Lisa Gayle Bradley, Esq. for several helpful suggestions and for her able assistance in the preparation of this Article This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol55/iss2/2 AN INVITATION TO COMMIT FRAUD: SECRET DESTRUCTION OF JOINT TENANT SURVIVORSHIP RIGHTS SAMUEL M. FETTERS* INTRODUCTION JOINT tenancy is the most popular form of spousal residential prop- erty ownership in the United States.' Indeed, it is safe to say that * Professor of Law, Syracuse University. I wish to thank Lisa Gayle Bradley, Esq. for several helpful suggestions and for her able assistance in the preparation of this Article. 1. See E.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Mineral Conveyancing and Title Issues - Part 1
    Advanced Mineral Conveyancing By Sheryl L Howe Scott L Turner Welborn Sullivan Meek & Tooley, P.C. Denver Paper 1 SHERYL L. HOWE is an attorney with the Denver law firm of Welborn Sullivan Meek 85 Tooley, P.C., where her practice focuses on oil and gas, including title, transactions, and royally issues, along with a variety of other real property matters. She has practiced law in Denver since 1982 and has worked on oil and gas and natural resources matters throughout her legal career. Ms. Howe received her B.A. with honors from the University of Iowa in 1979. She attended the University of Colorado Law School and received her Juris Doctor in 1982. She is licensed to practice iaw in Colorado and Wyoming. SCOTT TURNER is an associate with Welborn Sullivan Meek 85 Tooley, P.C. in Denver, Colorado. Since joining the Firm in 2010, his practice focuses on title examination, oil and gas transactional work, and business and real estate services. Scott received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Indiana University with distinction in 1998 and then worked as a business and information technology consultant with Accenture, LLP for seven years in locales throughout the United States and abroad. Scott then attended the University of Colorado Law School, where he served as the Technical Production Editor of the Colorado Law Review. Upon graduation, Scott began his legal career as a real estate and business transactional attorney with a small law firm based in Denver and Vail, Colorado. Scott is an active member of the Colorado, Wyoming, and American Bar Associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies and Techniques for Teaching Property EDITORIAL ADVISORS
    Strategies and Techniques for Teaching Property EDITORIAL ADVISORS Vicki Been Elihu Root Professor of Law New York University School of Law Erwin Chemerinsky Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law University of California, Irvine, School of Law Richard A. Epstein Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law New York University School of Law Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow The Hoover Institution Senior Lecturer in Law The University of Chicago Ronald J. Gilson Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business Stanford University Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business Columbia Law School James E. Krier Earl Warren DeLano Professor of Law The University of Michigan Law School Richard K. Neumann, Jr. Professor of Law Hofstra University School of Law Robert H. Sitkoff John L. Gray Professor of Law Harvard Law School David Alan Sklansky Professor of Law University of California at Berkeley School of Law Kent D. Syverud Dean and Ethan A. H. Shepley University Professor Washington University School of Law Elizabeth Warren Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law Harvard Law School Strategies and Techniques for Teaching Property Paula A. Franzese Peter W. Rodino Professor of Law Seton Hall University School of Law Howard E. Katz Series Editor Copyright © 2012 CCH Incorporated. Published by Wolters Kluwer Law & Business in New York. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business serves customers worldwide with CCH, Aspen Publishers, and Kluwer Law International products. (www.wolterskluwerlb.com) No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or utilized by any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Ownership and Transferring Are Important Features of Your Farm Succession Plan
    FACT SHEET • FS-1056 Property Ownership and Transferring Are Important Features of Your Farm Succession Plan any people think an estate You Can Own Two Forms of plan is just a will, but it is Property: Real vs. Personal Property Mmuch more than that. Your In the law, title has a specific estate plan will typically include definition and means the legal evidence documents and tools to distribute your of a person’s ownership rights in property according to your wishes property (Black’s Law Dictionary). following your death. When it comes There are two forms of property: to transitioning your farm or any family business to the next generation, how • Real property is land and anything property is owned and the property growing on, attached to, or erected transfers prior to your death can be on it. For example, your farmland, important features of your succession crops growing on the farmland, and plan or estate plan. Titling property in a any barns and other structures on the joint tenancy with rights of survivorship farmland are considered real property. allows you to choose who inherits upon • Personal property is a movable or your death and to transfer the property intangible object subject to ownership outside the will. Transferring property, and not classified as real property. such as through gifting, allows property Personal property includes, for to go to the next generation prior to your example, farm equipment, tools, death and provides control over who or company stock. gets your property. 1 ALEI | FS-1056 | Feb 2017 How Do You Own Your Property? Co-ownership is where more than one Fee Simple: Fee simple ownership, or fee simple person owns a piece of property.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Real Estate Ownership Correspondence Course Information
    3 Real Estate 1 Ownership AlaskaRealEstateSchool.com Chapter 3 Real Estate Ownership Correspondence Course Information Please read and become familiar with this information prior to the class date. This part of the class will be taken correspondence. You will be required to take a test on this information and the test must be returned prior to taking the classroom portion of the course. The remainder of the class may be taken in the classroom or by correspondence. If you have registered for the correspondence course, the test as well as the evaluation sheet must returned for grading and issuance of you graduation certificate. You may take the tests all at once or one chapter at a time. The test may be taken open book and the answer sheet must be sent back to: Email to [email protected] Or Fax to 866-659-8458 Or Mail to: AlaskaRealEstateSchool.com Attn: Denny Wood PO Box 241727 Anchorage, Alaska 99524-1727 copyright 2013 dwood 3 Real Estate 2 Ownership AlaskaRealEstateSchool.com Police Power Police power is the capacity of a state to regulate behaviors and enforce order within its territory, often framed in terms of public welfare, security, morality, and safety. Police power is legally considered an inherent power, limited only by prohibitions specified in the constitution of a state, making it the most expansive authorized power exercised by a state. The concept of police power in English common law dates back at least four centuries and roughly coincides with the breakdown of the feudal order in Europe and the development of towns and cities.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPERTY – CONCURRENT INTERESTS a Trustee Is Authorized to Foreclose on a Partial Interest of an Estate Where the Estate Is Held by Tenants in Common
    Fagnani, et. al. v. Fisher, et. al., No. 40, September Term, 2010 HEADNOTE – PROPERTY – CONCURRENT INTERESTS A trustee is authorized to foreclose on a partial interest of an estate where the estate is held by tenants in common. In this case, the trustees validly foreclosed on the undivided one half interest held by Carole and Ricardo Fagnani as tenants in common with Ronald Fagnani. HEADNOTE – PROPERTY – FORECLOSURE An exceptant may challenge procedural irregularities of a foreclosure sale by filing exceptions with the court before the sale is ratified. Challenges to the sufficiency of the advertisement and adequacy of the sale price are procedural issues which may form the basis of an exception. The exceptant bears the burden of overcoming the presumption of validity by showing the irregularities prejudiced the sale. HEADNOTE – PROPERTY – FORECLOSURE A mortgagee or beneficiary under a deed of trust may become the purchaser at a foreclosure sale. This court reviews a sale to the mortgagee with heightened scrutiny, and will set aside a sale upon slight evidence of partiality, unfairness or want of the strictest good faith. In this case, the mortgagee was the purchaser. We agree with the Court of Special Appeals that there was no evidence of partiality or unfairness, and therefore the sale was properly ratified. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 40 September Term, 2010 CAROLE M. FAGNANI, et al. v. JEFFREY B. FISHER, et al., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES Bell, C.J. Battaglia Greene Murphy Adkins Barbera Eldridge, John C. (Retired, specially assigned), JJ. Opinion by Greene, J. Filed: March 18, 2011 Petitioners Carole M.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Ownership in the United States
    Chapter 2 Types of Ownership in the United States Please note that all state rulings in the matter of law are defined by the courts and can change at any time with new court decisions. No portion of this workbook is a substitute for legal advice. TYPES OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP This lesson will present an overview of property ownership in the United States. The basic concepts of property ownership are, for the most part, consistent across the country; however, there are a number of variations from state to state. Therefore, the focus of this lesson will be a general overview of property ownership. The term property comes from a Latin word which means "belonging to one" or “one’s own.” In the United States, laws govern the ownership, transfer of ownership and the rights associated with property. It can be said that property ownership involves “rights, privileges, and benefits, which include rights of possession, occupation, and use, as well as the right to exclude others from the property, the right to sell, lease, mortgage, give away or abandon the property.” It also can be said that property ownership gives the owner the right to receive the fruits produced by the asset of such property. Such fruits would be rent from the land, crops from fields, or fruit from trees. The term and concept of estate can be traced back to the feudal system of England and can refer to four main categories of ownership or aspects thereof. They are: 1. FREEHOLD ESTATE - such as fee simple. The term Freehold Property refers to the ownership of land, which allows the possessor to have the use of the property without the hindrance of another party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Property
    THE LAW OF PROPERTY SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS Class 12 Professor Robert T. Farley, JD/LLM 81 CHAPTER 4 CONCURRENT OWNERSHIP AND MARITAL INTERESTS ChapterScope -------------------­ This chapter examines various forms of concurrent ownership of property, marital property interests, and the rights and obligations of co-owners. Here are the most important points in this chapter. ■ All types of property may be owned simultaneously by multiple people, a condition that invites conflict among co-owners. While co-owners are generally free to specify the terms of their relationship, law must provide some default rules that mediate conflict. ■ The principal forms of concurrent ownership are tenancy in common, joint tenancy, and tenancy by the entirety. ■ Tenancy in common is the modern default position. Unless a grant indicates a contrary inten­ tion, tenancy in common results froma grant to two or more persons. Tenants in common own separate but undivided interests in the whole of the property. ■ Joint tenancy differsfrom tenancy in common in that each joint tenant has an undivided interest in a single unit. The consequence is that each joint tenant has a right of survivorship - when a joint tenant dies his or her interest dies with him and the remaining joint tenant or tenants own it all. When there are two joint tenants this is an effective way to avoid probate. ■ At common law a joint tenancy was possible only if the joint tenants had unity of interest, time, title, and possession. These requirements have been relaxed by statute. A corollary to the fourunities was that the destructionof any unity severed the joint tenancy, producing a tenancy in common instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Quitclaim Deed for Leasehold Estate
    Quitclaim Deed For Leasehold Estate When Lemmie unrobe his actresses shovelled not mair enough, is Remus uncombed? Howard remains peccant after Napoleon shoulders denumerably or azotize any dearies. Peridial and hebetudinous Torrin ebonizing her aconite mispleads while Murdoch prattles some activator receptively. The property can be disclosed in a warranty deed an estate deed is subject of a position that the way to not own equal interest It quick claim for allocating recording provides landowners owe different forms highly recommended that for inheritance tax in his work for leasehold? In Rhode Island the ruler of mortgage deed and convey property passes fee. Referenced on earlier recorded real estate documents like the existing deed was the. Are writing two basic types a grantor warranty deed cover a quitclaim deed he should be. Pursuant to Agreement for Purchase for Sale of Leasehold Interest against Real Estate dated. Facts and timing and neat appearance of leasehold estate deed for public or dependency under this? If your brick is encumbered by a mineral lease the document you attend to. Use of open Special Warranty in Oklahoma and Texas Oil and. Should You mark a Lawyer for watching South Carolina Residential Real Estate Closing What. The drawback quite hard is that quitclaim deeds offer the granteerecipient no protection or guarantees whatsoever who the square or their ownership of me Maybe the grantor did we own the property at all or lease they believe had partial ownership. What happens if I route a quit claim deed? The leasehold estate in another party claims concerning any use a trust each drillsite.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Property I. Terminology A. Personal Property Is All Property Not Classified As Real Property
    Personal Property I. Terminology A. Personal property is all property not classified as real property. i. Tangible (e.g. car or books) 1. Consumable 2. Non-consumable ii. Intangible (e.g. stocks or bonds) B. Possession exists if a person has (all elements) i. Actual dominion and control over property ii. intent to assume dominion over it iii. With or without a claim of ownership C. Title exists if person has ownership with right to possession and transfer. II. Right to Exclude An owner of property has the right to exclude others A. Exceptions i. Denying the rights of individuals who are parties with owner in consensual transactions relating to the use of the owner’s property State v Shack ii. Necessity, private or public B. Damages for trespass i. Real Property DO NOT need damages 1. Intentional trespass a. Punitive damages may be supported only by nominal damages Jacque v Steenberg Homes, Inc. ii. Chattels MUST have damages to recover 1. Computer network Must have interference with the normal operation of the computer network, even if the owner says you can’t use it, sender is not liable. Intel Corporation v Hamidi III. Acquisition of Title by Judgment A. Replevin Replevin is an action to recover the chattel itself and exists if PL i. Has title or right to possession ii. Property is unlawfully detained iii. DF wrongfully holds possession B. Trespass Trespass is an action to recover money damages for dispossession C. Trover Trover is an action to recover the value of the chattel along with damages for dispossession i.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina's Reincarnated Joint Tenancy: Oh Intent, Where Art Thou? Daniel R
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 93 Article 2 Number 6 North Carolina Issue 9-1-2015 North Carolina's Reincarnated Joint Tenancy: Oh Intent, Where Art Thou? Daniel R. Tilly Patrick K. Hetrick Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel R. Tilly & Patrick K. Hetrick, North Carolina's Reincarnated Joint Tenancy: Oh Intent, Where Art Thou?, 93 N.C. L. Rev. 1649 (2015). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol93/iss6/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CITE AS 93 N.C. L. REV. 1649 (2015) NORTH CAROLINA’S REINCARNATED JOINT TENANCY: OH INTENT, WHERE ART THOU?* DANIEL R. TILLY** & PATRICK K. HETRICK*** A mother, her daughter, and her son-in-law received title to a North Carolina home as joint tenants with right of survivorship. Little did the mother know that she was almost instantly destroying the newborn joint tenancy when, in order to finance the purchase price, she alone executed a mortgage note and deed of trust at the closing. When she died several years later with that mortgage loan in default, a legal dispute arose centered on whether “severance” of the joint tenancy had occurred. Following traditional joint tenancy law theory, the Court of Appeals decided somewhat reluctantly that the joint tenancy was indeed severed at the very closing during which it was successfully created; for by executing the deed of trust, the mother had conveyed “title” according to North Carolina’s title theory of mortgage law.
    [Show full text]