Quitclaim Deed for Leasehold Estate
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Warranty Deed
This document was prepared by: __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ Warranty Deed WARRANTY DEED, made this _______ day of __________, 20____ by and between _______________________________________________________ of the city of __________and the county of ___________ (“grantor”) and ___________________________________________________ (“grantee”) whose mailing address is ________________________________________________________________ THE GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of ______________ DOLLARS ($_________) the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby grant, bargain, self and convey unto the grantee his/her heirs and assigns, the following described premises located in the county of ___________, state of ____________, described as follows: Also known as street and number ______________________________________________________ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with its appurtenances unto the said Grantee his/her heirs and assigns forever. Grantors covenant with the Grantee that the Grantors are now seized in fee simple absolute of said premises; that the Grantors have full power to convey the same; that the same is free from all encumbrances excepting those set forth above; that the Grantee shall enjoy the same without any lawful disturbance; that the Grantors will, on demand, execute and deliver to the Grantee, at the expense of the Grantors, any further assurance of the same that may be reasonably required, and, with the exceptions set forth above, that the Grantors warrant to the Grantee and will defend for him/her all the said premises against every person lawfully claiming all or any interest in same, subject to real property taxes accrued by not yet due and payable and any other covenants, conditions, easements, rights of way, laws and restrictions of record. -
Fee Vs. Leasehold 1 Chapter 1
Chapter 1: Fee vs. leasehold 1 Chapter 1 Fee vs. leasehold SAMPLE Click to watch After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Learning • identify the different possessory interests held in real estate, and Objectives the rights and obligations associated with each; • distinguish the individual rights which collectively comprise real property; • identify the different types of leasehold interests held by tenants; • understand leasehold interests which convey special rights, such as a ground lease, master lease or sublease. estate life estate Key Terms fee estate master lease fixed-term tenancy parcel ground lease profit a prendre impairment sublease leasehold estate tenancy-at-sufferance legal description tenancy-at-will Real estate, sometimes legally called real property or realty, consists of: A matter of • the land; possession • the improvements and fixtures attached to the land; and • all rights incidental or belonging to the property.1 1 Calif. Civil Code §658 2 Property Management, Sixth Edition parcel A parcel of real estate is located by circumscribing its legal description on A three-dimensional the “face of the earth.” Based on the legal description, a surveyor locates and portion of real estate sets the corners and surface boundaries of the parcel. The legal description is identified by a legal description. contained in deeds, subdivision maps or government surveys relating to the property. legal description All permanent structures, crops and timber are part of the parcel of real estate. The description used to locate and set The parcel of real estate also includes buildings, fences, trees, watercourses boundaries for a parcel and easements within the parcel’s boundaries. -
Law and Practice
GLOBAL PRACTICE GUIDEs Definitive global law guides offering comparative analysis from top ranked lawyers USA Regional Real Estate Montana Crowley Fleck PLLP chambersandpartners.com 2018 MONTANA LAW AND PRACTICE: p.3 Contributed by Crowley Fleck PLLP The ‘Law & Practice’ sections provide easily accessible information on navigating the legal system when conducting business in the jurisdic- tion. Leading lawyers explain local law and practice at key transactional stages and for crucial aspects of doing business. LAW AND PRACTICE MONTANA Contributed by Crowley Fleck PLLP Authors: Kevin Heaney, Matthew McLean, Michael Tennant, Alissa Chambers Law and Practice Contributed by Crowley Fleck PLLP CoNTENTS 1. General p.5 4. Planning and Zoning p.11 1.1 Main Substantive Skills p.5 4.1 Legislative and Governmental Controls Applicable 1.2 Most Significant Trends p.5 to Design, Appearance and Method of Construction p.11 1.3 Impact of the New US Tax Law Changes p.6 4.2 Regulatory Authorities p.11 2. Sale and Purchase p.6 4.3 Obtaining Entitlements to Develop a New 2.1 Ownership Structures p.6 Project p.11 2.2 Important Jurisdictional Requirements p.6 4.4 Right of Appeal Against an Authority’s 2.3 Effecting Lawful and Proper Transfer of Title p.6 Decision p.12 2.4 Real Estate Due Diligence p.6 4.5 Agreements with Local or Governmental 2.5 Typical Representations and Warranties for Authorities p.12 Purchase and Sale Agreements p.6 4.6 Enforcement of Restrictions on Development 2.6 Important Areas of Laws for Foreign Investors p.8 and Designated Use p.12 2.7 Soil Pollution and Environmental 5. -
1400 Co Ownership and Condominium
1400 CO-OWNERSHIP AND CONDOMINIUM Marshall E. Tracht Associate Professor, Hofstra University School of Law © Copyright 1999 Marshall E. Tracht Abstract Co-ownership refers to legal relations in which two or more entities have equal rights to the use and enjoyment of property. Co-ownership relationships may satisfy the preferences of some owners, and predefined categories of co-ownership, as opposed to contractually defined relations, may allow parties to satisfy these preferences at relatively low cost. However, shared ownership results in coordination and externality problems, which the law attempts to mitigate in numerous ways, including judicial oversight of ‘reasonableness’ (as in the law of waste) or fiduciary duties; ending the co-ownership relation (through the right of partition) or providing rules that seek to optimize the joint decision-making process (such as compulsory unitization). A major area of growth in shared ownership is in condominium developments, where entities own some property individually, while co-owning common facilities. This permits parties to take advantage of economies of scale and the joint provision of common goods. Condominium arrangements are governed by a combination of contract, statute and judicial law, and typically include democratic decision-making structures intended to minimize the sum of decision-making costs (gathering information, voting, and bargaining) and the cost of erroneous decisions. JEL classification: K11, P32, H41 Keywords: Cotenancy, Co-ownership, Condiminium, Cooperative, Communal Ownership 1. Introduction Co-ownership refers to legal relationships that entitle two or more entities to equal rights to the use and enjoyment of property. Although it most often arises in the context of real property, co-ownership may apply to any type of property. -
Water Law in Real Estate Transactions
Denver Bar Association Real Estate Section Luncheon November 6, 2014 Water Law in Real Estate Transactions by Paul Noto, Esq. [email protected] Prior Appropriation Doctrine • Prior Appropriation Doctrine – First in Time, First in Right • Water allocated exclusively based on priority dates • Earliest priorities divert all they need (subject to terms in decree) • Shortages of water are not shared • “Pure” prior appropriation in CO A historical sketch of Colorado water law • Early rejection of the Riparian Doctrine, which holds that landowners adjacent to a stream can make a reasonable use of the water flowing through your land. – This policy was ill-suited to Colorado and would have hindered growth, given that climate and geography necessitate transporting water far from a stream to make land productive. • In 1861 the Territorial Legislature provided that water could be taken from the streams to lands not adjacent to streams. • In 1872, the Colorado Territorial Supreme Court recognized rights of way (easements), citing custom and necessity, through the lands of others for ditches carrying irrigation water to its place of use. Yunker v. Nichols, 1 Colo. 551, 570 (1872) A historical sketch of Colorado water law • In 1876 the Colorado Constitution declared: – “The water of every natural stream, not heretofore appropriated, within the state of Colorado, is hereby declared to be the property of the public, and the same is dedicated to the use of the people of the state, subject to appropriation as hereinafter provided.” Const. of Colo., Art. XVI, Sec. 5. – “The right to divert the unappropriated waters of any natural stream to beneficial uses shall never be denied. -
1 EXHIBIT C-3 FORM of GROUND LEASE DEED of LEASE Between FAIRFAX COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT and HOUSING AUTHORITY, As Landlord And
EXHIBIT C-3 FORM OF GROUND LEASE DEED OF LEASE between FAIRFAX COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, as Landlord and ONE UNIVERSITY SENIOR, LLC as Tenant [__________], 20__ KH 567092.4 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page RECITALS ..................................................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 PREMISES AND TERM OF LEASE ...................................................................... 9 Section 2.01. Premises. ............................................................................................................... 9 Section 2.02. Term ...................................................................................................................... 9 Section 2.03. Use. During the Term ........................................................................................... 9 Section 2.04. Ownership of the Improvements. .......................................................................... 9 Section 2.05. Landlord’s Right to Terminate.............................................................................. 9 ARTICLE 3 RENT ...................................................................................................................... 10 Section 3.01. Base Rent. ........................................................................................................... 10 Section 3.02. Proration of Impositions -
Lease Agreement Between the District of Columbia As Landlord and As Tenant Date
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AS LANDLORD AND ______________________________ AS TENANT DATE: __________________, 201_ EXECUTION COPY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I. REFERENCE PROVISIONS, DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS .............................1 Section 1.01 Reference Provisions. ..................................................................................1 Section 1.02 Definitions....................................................................................................3 ARTICLE II. LEASED PREMISES................................................................................................5 ARTICLE III. TERM.......................................................................................................................5 Section 3.01 Term. ............................................................................................................5 Section 3.02 End of Term. ................................................................................................5 Section 3.03 Holding Over. ..............................................................................................5 ARTICLE IV. USE AND OPERATION OF THE LEASED PREMISES .....................................5 Section 4.01 Continuous Operation by Tenant and Opening Covenant. ..........................6 Section 4.02 Use. ..............................................................................................................6 Section 4.03 Signs. ............................................................................................................6 -
902:Real Estate Basics: Negotiating & Structuring Commercial Leases
ACC’S 2004 ANNUAL MEETING THE NEW FACE OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL 902:Real Estate Basics: Negotiating & Structuring Commercial Leases & Subleases Kimberly M.W. Gilpin Vice President, Assistant General Counsel The Finish Line, Inc. Angela L. Humphreys General Counsel Investco Financial Corporation Carol D. Miller General Counsel Restaurants Unlimited This material is protected by copyright. Copyright © 2004 various authors and the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC). Materials may not be reproduced without the consent of ACC. Reprint permission requests should be directed to James Merklinger at ACC: 202/293-4103, ext. 326; [email protected] ACC's 2004 ANNUAL MEETING THE NEW FACE OF IN-HOUSE COUNSEL Faculty Biographies Kimberly M.W. Gilpin Kimberly M.W. Gilpin is vice president, assistant general counsel, lease administration at The Finish Line, Inc., an athletic footwear and apparel retailer located in Indianapolis. Ms. Gilpin is primarily responsible for the company's legal leasing functions including negotiating and drafting lease language and documents. In addition, she is responsible for supervising lease process flow and implementation as well as acting as a department head for the legal/lease administration department, managing company policy compliance issues, reviewing and negotiating third party vendor contracts, and providing legal support to other corporate departments on real estate activities and corporate compliance matters. Prior to joining the Finish Line team, Ms. Gilpin served as a program director for the Paralegal Studies Program at International Business College. Her experience in the practice areas of real estate, probate, and estate planning, and working as an account representative for West Publishing Company led to her success in building the program and working with paraprofessional students. -
Types of Deeds Components of the Deed
Types of Deeds General Warranty • Warrants title against all defects in title, whether they arose before and after grantor took title. Special Warranty • Warrants title against the grantor’s own acts but not the acts of others. Quitclaim • No warranties. Conveys whatever interest/title that grantor has, which could be nothing. U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2008 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. Components of the Deed • Location of the property • Salutation • Grantor’s name and residence • Consideration, receipt of consideration, and method of payment • Granting grantee the property and grantee residence U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2008 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. 1 Components of the Deed Cont’d • Description of the property • Habendum (to-have-and-to-hold) • Warranty • Any limitation of title or the interest • Execution date and place • Execution • Acknowledgment (notary) U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. Burke Copyright©2008 Marcilynn A. Burke All rights reserved. Provided for student use only. Warranties • Present • Covenant of seisin • Covenant of right to convey • Covenant against encumbrances • Future • Covenant of general warranty • Covenant of quiet enjoyment • Covenant of further assurances U N I V E R S I T Y of H O U S T O N Professor Marcilynn A. -
Chapter 12 Questions Transfer of Title
Modern Real Estate Practice, 18th Edition Chapter 12 Questions Transfer of Title 1. The title to real estate passes when a valid deed is a. signed and recorded. b. delivered and accepted. c. filed and microfilmed. d. executed and mailed. 2. The primary purpose of a deed is to a. prove ownership. b. transfer title rights. c. give constructive notice. d. prevent adverse possession. 3. A special warranty deed differs from a general warranty deed in that the grantor's covenant in the special warranty deed a. applies only to a definite limited time. b. covers the time back to the original title. c. is implied and is not written in full. d. protects all subsequent owners of the property. 4. The severalty owner of a parcel of land sells it to a buyer. The buyer insists that the owner's wife join in signing the deed. The purpose of obtaining the wife's signature is to a. waive any marital or homestead rights. b. defeat any curtesy rights. c. provide evidence that the owner is married. d. satisfy the parol evidence rule. 5. A third party holds title to property on behalf of someone else through the use of a a. devise. b. quitclaim deed. c. bequest. d. deed in trust. ©2010 Kaplan, Inc. Modern Real Estate Practice, 18th Edition 6. In a real estate transaction, transfer taxes that are due are charged a. to the buyer unless this is forbidden by statute or regulation. b. according to local custom unless the parties are from different jurisdictions. c. to the parties as agreed in the contract of sale. -
A Primer on Deeds in Texas
A Primer on Deeds in Texas INTRODUCTION A deed is a written document that conveys legal title to real property. It is different from a promissory note or a real estate lien note, which is a promise to pay a sum of money to a lender; and a deed of trust, which provides a lender with remedies, including foreclosure, if a borrower defaults on a note. These three documents are the three principal documents in most Texas real estate transactions. There is no “standard form” for a deed. Texas does have, however, certain rules that apply if a deed is to be valid. For example, the intent to convey property must be clear from the wording; the property must be adequately described; and the deed must be signed and acknowledged by the grantor. This article addresses the deeds commonly used in Texas. RECORDING A DEED IS NOT A NECESSITY There is no requirement that a deed be recorded in the county clerk's real property records in order to be valid. The deed only needs to be executed and delivered to the grantee. At that time, the transfer is fully effective between grantor (seller) and grantee (buyer). Recording is simply used to give notice to the public of the transfer and, most importantly, establishes priority in the event a questionable seller gives more than one deed to the property. Recording makes it easier for title companies to research and insure the chain of title. Recording also informs the taxing authorities where they should send the ad valorem tax bill. PURCHASE PRICE NOT REQUIRED IN DEEDS In Texas, it is customary to recite that the consideration paid is “Ten dollars and other valuable consideration.” While recording gives the public notice that a transaction concerning the property took place, therefore, preserving the chain of title, it is believed that it is not the public´s business what the purchase price was. -
Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights
Fordham Law Review Volume 55 Issue 2 Article 2 1986 An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights Samuel M. Fetters Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuel M. Fetters, An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 173 (1986). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol55/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Invitation to Commit Fraud: Secret Destruction of Joint Tenant Survivorship Rights Cover Page Footnote * Professor of Law, Syracuse University. I wish to thank Lisa Gayle Bradley, Esq. for several helpful suggestions and for her able assistance in the preparation of this Article This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol55/iss2/2 AN INVITATION TO COMMIT FRAUD: SECRET DESTRUCTION OF JOINT TENANT SURVIVORSHIP RIGHTS SAMUEL M. FETTERS* INTRODUCTION JOINT tenancy is the most popular form of spousal residential prop- erty ownership in the United States.' Indeed, it is safe to say that * Professor of Law, Syracuse University. I wish to thank Lisa Gayle Bradley, Esq. for several helpful suggestions and for her able assistance in the preparation of this Article. 1. See E.