DOCSLIB.ORG

RESPONSE to the ROLE of LAW AWARD Chorbishop John D. Faris October 12, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RESPONSE to the ROLE of LAW AWARD Chorbishop John D. Faris October 12, 2011 RESPONSE TO THE ROLE OF LAW AWARD Chorbishop John D. Faris October 12, 2011 I must begin by expressing my deep gratitude to the Board of Governors and members of the Canon law Society of America for this award. All of us dedicated to ministry in the Church are subtly imbued with the attitude that we should not demand or even expect a word of appreciation but, after completion of a task, to accept dismissal as a good and faithful servant. This recognition, while not deserved, is appreciated and encouraging. I realize that I am the second Eastern Catholic canonist who has been given this award by the Society. Ukrainian Catholic Archimandrite Victor Pospishil received the Role of Law award in 1994. I am humbled to follow in the footsteps of this scholar for whom I have so much affection and esteem. The Canon Law Society of America can take pride in all that it has done on behalf of the Eastern Catholic Churches. It was the first to publish a vernacular translation of the Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium. For decades the Society had a committee dedicated to the concerns of Eastern Catholic Churches, a function that has now been entrusted to the present Church Governance Committee. It should also be noted that Eastern Catholic topics figure regularly in the convention programs. We Eastern Catholics are grateful for all these initiatives, but most of all for the interest and loving concern that this Society—with its predominantly Latin Catholic membership—has shown for us. This evening I would like to reflect briefly on concerns that are rather new for us Catholics: ecumenism and the reform of the Church implicit in it. Before Vatican II, Catholic efforts on behalf of Church unity meant prayers for the return of schismatics or apostates to the Catholic Church. The issue of whether the Church stood in need of reform never arose; in fact, the generally-accepted opinion was that the Church could not be reformed. And then, on 28 October 1958, Cardinal Angelo Roncalli was elected to the See of Peter. After the nearly two-decade pontificate of his predecessor, Pius XII, one might surmise that the cardinal electors had intended to elect a short-term caretaker; Roncalli was 76 at the time of his election.[i] They did not seem to be looking for a man of action or innovation. Nevertheless, within 90 days of his election, Pope John XXIII made an announcement that was to change the world. On 25 January 1959, at the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls—and this is important—at vespers celebrating the conclusion of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, the pope announced the revision of the Code of Canon Law, a synod for the Diocese of Rome and—most importantly–the convocation of an ecumenical council. As an aside, the press embargo on the announcement expired before the announcement was made because the services ran a little longer than scheduled; the news was broadcast to the world before anyone in the basilica knew anything about it. [ii] I call this event to your attention because it is important to remind ourselves of the primary purpose of the Second Vatican Council. Pope John XXIII convoked the council for the express purpose of the unity of the Christians and human family. This reconciliation was to be accomplished by means a renewal of the Church.[iii] To reiterate: the purpose of the Council was the restoration of the unity of Christians and the means to this end was to be the renewal of the Church. I would postulate that somewhere along the line, the means became the end and the end became marginalized. Have we—as individuals and as a professional society—focused on the renewal of the Church and paid insufficient attention to the primary purpose of the Council, Christian unity? An examination of the mandates of the various on-going committee reveals that the word “ecumenism” is nowhere mentioned; presentations treating ecumenical issues in our conventions are rare. There may be a few reasons for this oversight. Some canonists retain the formerly-held approach to Church unity that the non-Catholics should renounce their errors and return to the unity of the Catholic Church. Others argue that the quest for Church unity is a utopian ideal and characterize ecumenists as seekers of the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Still others among us deem ecumenism to be a praiseworthy endeavor, but are just to busy with putting our fires and keeping the operations going to address the issue. Perhaps institutional fatigue has set in: Lots of conferences and papers, but “apparently” little to show for it. It is not my intention to justify ecumenism, but to encourage the Society and canonists to engage more actively in ecumenical initiatives. Now that some of the fruits of the ecumenical movement are about to be harvested, we canonists are needed more than ever.[iv] There has been astounding progress in the past fifty years to heal a breach that has existed for a millennium. Forgive my boldness, but I would assert that canon law as a discipline has not fully embraced ecumenism; nor have canonists devoted enough time and effort to promote the unity of Christians. Permit me to illustrate this point. As one might expect, neither the 1917 Codex Iuris Canonici, nor the pre-conciliar, incomplete Codex Iuris Canonici Orientalis (issued between 1948 and 1957) for the Eastern Catholic Churches contain a single canon that promotes ecumenism. The sea-change took place when the Council addressed the issue in the dogmatic constitution on the Church, Lumen gentium, in the specific decree on the topic, Unitatis redintegratio and other documents, such as Orientalium Ecclesiarum also treat the issue. It was then left to canon law to codify the conciliar insights into the revised codes for the Latin and Eastern Churches. The commission entrusted with revising the Latin Code was established by Pope John XXIII on 28 March 1963, shortly before his death. In 1967, the Commission elaborated a set of principles to guide the task of revision. These principles were submitted to the Synod of Bishops and were approved in October 1967. One of the main purposes of these ten Principles for the Revision of the Latin Code [v] “was to guarantee harmony between the Church’s revised law and the conciliar documents….The ten principles . are more than a historical curiosity of the process of revision. They are useful . in understanding the theory behind certain legal changes. .”[vi] It is noteworthy that the Principles are silent with regard to ecumenism. Had the primary purpose of the Council already disappeared from the “radar screen” of canon law? This is not to say that the 1983 Latin Code is devoid of canons that foster the reconciliation of Christians, but one would have a difficult time in asserting that it is a priority of the Latin Code. Because of a variety of historical, ecclesial, liturgical and social factors, the situation is different with regard to the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. After providing for a rationale and possibility for a common (n. 1), genuinely Eastern code for the Eastern Catholic Churches (n. 2), the 1974 Guidelines for the Revision of the Code of Oriental Canon Law treats the ecumenical character of the future Code (n. 3). The Guidelines assure the Orthodox that the future code will be only for those persons who are members of an Eastern Catholic Church, that is, the Catholic Church is not presuming to legislate on behalf of the Orthodox Churches. The Guidelines go on to refer to Orientalium Ecclesiarum (nn. 1 and 24) and emphasize that, “It must be a prime concern of the new Code to promote the fulfillment of the desire expressed by the Second Vatican Council that the Eastern Catholic Churches “flourish and execute with new apostolic vigor the task entrusted to them … as regards the special office of promoting the unity of all Christians.” Pope John Paul II, in his presentation of the 1990 Eastern Code, was enthusiastic regarding its ecumenical dimensions: “There is no norm in the Code that does not promote the path of unity among all Christians.”[vii] Pope John Paul II went so far as to “present” the new Code to the Orthodox Churches.[viii] The late pope took a similar optimistic approach regarding the ecumenical effectiveness of the new code in Sacri canones,[ix] the apostolic constitution that promulgated it. He referred to the possible obsolescence of the code by indicating that it might be abrogated or changed when full communion of all the Eastern Churches with the Catholic Church has been restored.[x] Ironically, we are encouraged to pray and strive for its obsolescence and the abrogation of the Eastern Code. When full communion between the Orthodox and Catholic Churches has been achieved, the Eastern Code will have fulfilled one of its primary missions; a new legal arrangement will be necessary. I would call to your attention a canon in the Eastern Code: CCEO c. 192 §2. The eparchial bishop is to see in a special way that all Christian faithful committed to his care foster unity among Christians according to principles approved by the Church. It should be noted that this canon does not have a counterpart in the Latin Code. The purpose of these comments is not to compare the two codes, but to urge Latin canonists to engage themselves in ecumenism and make a contribution that will be crucial. We must remember that the Eastern Catholics number only 15 million in a Catholic Church of approximately 1.2 billion; the effectiveness is limited.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of Sacrosanctum Concilium Part 2 Or, How to Grok
    The development of Sacrosanctum Concilium Part 2 - a presentation by Seán O’Seasnáin on becoming familiar with Vatican II and the Liturgy with a focus on Chapter 4 of What Happened at Vatican II by John W. O’Malley The Lines Are Drawn - The First Period (1962) or, How to grok Sacrosanctum Concilium (SC) while avoiding moonbats and wingnuts from the vantage point of a young Irish friar in formation at the time of Vatican II The four aggiornamento modernization principles identified by John W. O’Malley p140f 1) ressourcement 2) adaptation 3) episcopal collegiality and 4) active participation (Ch.4 of What Happened at Vatican II) are correctly described by O’Malley as fundamental and traditional principles. In a harsh and pedantic review of What Happened at Vatican II the late Richard John Neuhaus, on one hand gives O’Malley back-handed compliments for his balanced analysis, and in the next sentence rushes in to castigate him with misleading accusations of presenting the ‘discontinuity’ perspective of the council. Neuhaus writes dismissively: “What Happened at Vatican II is a 372-page brief for the party of novelty and discontinuity. Its author comes very close to saying explicitly what is frequently implied: that the innovationists practiced subterfuge, and they got away with it” [10]. I would have to credit Neuhaus with providing a reminder here of how appropriate the ‘moonbat’ and ‘wingnut’ designations are when it comes to critiques of Vatican II and the liturgy. He writes: “In the decades following the council, many liberals made no secret of their belief that aggiornamento was a mandate for radical change, even revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vatican II Decree on the Eastern Catholic
    KL BH The Vatican II Decree EH CH on the Eastern Catholic Churches Orientalium ecclesiarum - Fifty Years Later Carr Hall (Father Madden Hall) Trinity College (Trinity College Chapel) J.M. KellyJ.M. Library (coffee lounge) — — October 17 & 18, 2014 — KL CH TC N University of St. Michael’s College in the University of Toronto ORGANIZED BY THE METROPOLITAN ANDREY SHEPTYTSKY INSTITUTE OF EASTERN CHRISTIAN STUDIES www.sheptytskyinstitute.ca TC Co-sponsored by The Catholic Near East Welfare Association Centre for Research on the Second Vatican Council in Canada, St. Michael’s College Toronto Research on Vatican II and 21st Century Catholicism, Saint Paul University, Ottawa Brennan Hall ( Senior RoomCommon & Canada Room) Elmsley Hall (Charbonnel Lounge) — — CONFERENCE MAP CONFERENCE BH EH ANNOUNCEMENTS Saturday, October 18 9:00am—Father Madden Hall in Carr Hall, 100 St Joseph St. During the conference, snacks can be purchased across the street from Carr Hall at the coffee Morning Prayer according to the Byzantine Christian Tradition lounge in the Kelly Library. 9:30am—Father Madden Hall in Carr Hall, 100 St Joseph St. Lunch (available 11:30am-2:30pm) and dinner (available 5:30-7:30pm) can be purchased in 3) Bishop Nicholas Samra: “Eastern Catholicism in the Middle East Fifty Years after the Canada Room of Brennan Hall. Orientalium ecclesiarum” 11:00-11:45am Parallel sessions Bishop David Motiuk: “An Overview of the Ukrainian Catholic Church on the Eve of the Second Vatican Council”—Father Madden Hall in Carr Hall, 100 St Joseph St. Friday, October 17 Andriy Chirovsky: “TBA”—Charbonnel Lounge 1:00pm—Father Madden Hall in Carr Hall, 100 St Joseph St.
    [Show full text]
  • Branson-Shaffer-Vatican-II.Pdf
    Vatican II: The Radical Shift to Ecumenism Branson Shaffer History Faculty advisor: Kimberly Little The Catholic Church is the world’s oldest, most continuous organization in the world. But it has not lasted so long without changing and adapting to the times. One of the greatest examples of the Catholic Church’s adaptation to the modernization of society is through the Second Vatican Council, held from 11 October 1962 to 8 December 1965. In this gathering of church leaders, the Catholic Church attempted to shift into a new paradigm while still remaining orthodox in faith. It sought to bring the Church, along with the faithful, fully into the twentieth century while looking forward into the twenty-first. Out of the two billion Christians in the world, nearly half of those are Catholic.1 But, Vatican II affected not only the Catholic Church, but Christianity as a whole through the principles of ecumenism and unity. There are many reasons the council was called, both in terms of internal, Catholic needs and also in aiming to promote ecumenism among non-Catholics. There was also an unprecedented event that occurred in the vein of ecumenical beginnings: the invitation of preeminent non-Catholic theologians and leaders to observe the council proceedings. This event, giving outsiders an inside look at 1 World Religions (2005). The Association of Religious Data Archives, accessed 13 April 2014, http://www.thearda.com/QuickLists/QuickList_125.asp. CLA Journal 2 (2014) pp. 62-83 Vatican II 63 _____________________________________________________________ the Catholic Church’s way of meeting modern needs, allowed for more of a reaction from non-Catholics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Mission of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, Origins to 1933
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2017 Lux Occidentale: The aE stern Mission of the Pontifical Commission for Russia, Origins to 1933 Michael Anthony Guzik University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Guzik, Michael Anthony, "Lux Occidentale: The Eastern Mission of the Pontifical ommiC ssion for Russia, Origins to 1933" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1632. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1632 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LUX OCCIDENTALE: THE EASTERN MISSION OF THE PONTIFICAL COMMISSION FOR RUSSIA, ORIGINS TO 1933 by Michael A. Guzik A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August 2017 ABSTRACT LUX OCCIDENTALE: THE EASTERN MISSION OF THE PONTIFICAL COMMISSION FOR RUSSIA, ORIGINS TO 1933 by Michael A. Guzik The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2017 Under the Supervision of Professor Neal Pease Although it was first a sub-commission within the Congregation for the Eastern Churches (CEO), the Pontifical Commission for Russia (PCpR) emerged as an independent commission under the presidency of the noted Vatican Russian expert, Michel d’Herbigny, S.J. in 1925, and remained so until 1933 when it was re-integrated into CEO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See ADDRESS OF THE HOLY FATHER POPE JOHN PAUL II TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE ORIENTAL CHURCHES Thursday, 1 October 1998 Your Beatitudes, Your Eminences, Venerable Brothers in the Episcopate and the Priesthood, 1. It is a great joy for me to meet you during your Congregation’s plenary assembly, while you are reflecting on several lines of action for the dicastery over the next few years to serve the Eastern Catholic Churches. In particular, I thank Cardinal Achille Silvestrini, Prefect of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches, for his courteous greeting on behalf of you all. I would also like to express my gratitude for the service of the Congregation, which assists the Bishop of Rome “in the exercise of his supreme pastoral office for the welfare and service of the universal Church and the particular Churches. This strengthens the unity of faith and the communion of the People of God and promotes the Church’s mission in the world” (Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus, Art. 1). 2. Among the various dicasteries of the Roman Curia, the Congregation for the Oriental Churches has a particularly delicate task because of its institutional competence and the present moment in history. Your Congregation “deals with matters, whether regarding persons or things, concerning the Eastern Catholic Churches” (Pastor Bonus, Art. 56). Its competence “extends to all matters which 2 are proper to the Eastern Churches and which are to be referred to the Apostolic See, whether concerning the structure and organization of the Churches, the exercise of the functions of teaching, sanctifying and governing, or persons and their status, rights and duties” (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See LETTER OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS TO THE BISHOPS OF INDIA Dear Brother Bishops, 1. The remarkable varietas Ecclesiarum, the result of a long historical, cultural, spiritual and disciplinary development, constitutes a treasure of the Church, regina in vestitu deaurato circumdata varietate (cf. Ps 44 and Leo XIII, Orientalium Dignitas), who awaits her groom with the fidelity and patience of the wise virgin, equipped with an abundant supply of oil, so that the light of her lamp may enlighten all peoples in the long night of awaiting the Lord’s coming. This variety of ecclesial life, which shines with great splendour throughout lands and nations, is also found in India. The Catholic Church in India has its origins in the preaching of the Apostle Thomas. It developed through contact with the Churches of Chaldean and Antiochian traditions and through the efforts of Latin missionaries. The history of Christianity in this great country thus led to three distinct sui iuris Churches, corresponding to ecclesial expressions of the same faith celebrated in different rites according to the three liturgical, spiritual, theological and disciplinary traditions. Although this situation has sometimes led to tensions in the course of history, today we can admire a Christian presence that is both rich and beautiful, complex and unique. 2. It is essential for the Catholic Church to reveal her face in all its beauty to the world, in the richness of her various traditions. For this reason the Congregation for the Oriental Churches, which celebrates its centenary year, having been established through the farsightedness of Pope Benedict XV in 1917, has encouraged, where necessary, the restoration of Eastern Catholic traditions, and ensured their protection, as well as respect for the dignity and rights of these ancient Churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Ann Maronite Church Information Booklet
    THE WAY TO PARADISE Saint Ann Maronite Church Scranton, PA INFORMATION BOOKLET Price and Sumner Avenue Scranton, PA 18504 (570) 344-2129 Page 1 of 27 THE FAITH AND LIFE OF THE CHURCH ARE EMBODIED IN HISTORY HANDED ON BY TEACHING EXPRESSED THROUGH LITURGY AND MEMORIALIZED IN ARCHITECTURE Msgr. Ronald N. Beshara Page 2 of 27 OUR PAST ... Maronite history has its origins in Antioch where the early Christians received their faith from Saint Peter after he fled persecutions in Jerusalem. According to Acts 11:26 the followers of Christ were called Christians for the first time in Antioch. The seat of the Church remained there for 7 years before being transferred to Rome. Prior to 741 there were 7 Syro-Catholic Popes, 5 of them were Syro-Maronites. Antioch was a Hellenistic city while Edessa to the Northeast maintained a Syriac-Aramaic culture followed by the Christians who later were to be called Maronite. Their tradition followed the language, theology and liturgy of Christ and His Apostles thus reflecting their mentality. After divisions and persecutions the Christians gradually migrated to the safety of the mountains in Lebanon. Thus the liturgical roots of the Maronite Church can be traced to Antioch and Edessa. In the 4th century Saint Maron, a friend of Saint John Chrysostom, fought the heresies that beset the Catholic Church at that time, particularly Arianism, Monophysitism and Nestorianism. His monastery became the principal center of pastoral and spiritual care for the area. The monks and followers, then called Maronites, were continually called upon and willing to sacrifice their lives for their religious convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Epistle of Thegan, Chorbishop of Trier, to Hatto
    Epistle of Thegan, chorbishop of Trier, to Hatto (ca. 836) [ed. Ernst Dümmler, MGH Epistolae 5 (Berlin, 1899) 337] Translated by • Courtney M. Booker University of British Columbia ([email protected]) –September 2008– [To be used for teaching purposes only. Please do not cite or reproduce without permission] To the venerable lord and father in Christ, Hatto, most noble duke and councilor, Thegan, a sinner, although a priest, proclaims greetings in the Lord Jesus Christ. When I had considered for a long time what, from my poverty, I might have offered to your serene 5 presence on account of your immense kindness, which, not because my merits were deserving [of it], you deigned to show to me constantly, and in order that I might entrust the memory of my name to your piety, nothing came to mind but that I might send to you some little work of the holy fathers, to which you could devote your reverend attention. Thereupon, I sent you [a copy of?] that book, which holy Alcuin, the supreme scholar, compiled from the various books of Saint Augustine into one [volume], a 10 book which he delivered to the most expert and noble emperor Charles (just as the prologue of that book notes), where can be found, as it is the greatest necessity of human affairs, [works] on the divine nature and essence, on the eternal growth of God the Father, on the eternal nativity of God the Son, on the eternal procession of the Holy Spirit, on the incarnation of Jesus Christ, Son of God, how God is a single trinity and a triple singularity, just as true faith bids [us] to believe, and he who does not believe 15 thus is a stranger from Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of “Sister Churches” in Catholic-Orthodox Relations Since
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Will T. Cohen Washington, D.C. 2010 The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II Will T. Cohen, Ph.D. Director: Paul McPartlan, D.Phil. Closely associated with Catholic-Orthodox rapprochement in the latter half of the 20 th century was the emergence of the expression “sister churches” used in various ways across the confessional division. Patriarch Athenagoras first employed it in this context in a letter in 1962 to Cardinal Bea of the Vatican Secretariat for the Promotion of Christian Unity, and soon it had become standard currency in the bilateral dialogue. Yet today the expression is rarely invoked by Catholic or Orthodox officials in their ecclesial communications. As the Polish Catholic theologian Waclaw Hryniewicz was led to say in 2002, “This term…has now fallen into disgrace.” This dissertation traces the rise and fall of the expression “sister churches” in modern Catholic-Orthodox relations and argues for its rehabilitation as a means by which both Catholic West and Orthodox East may avoid certain ecclesiological imbalances toward which each respectively tends in its separation from the other. Catholics who oppose saying that the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church are sisters, or that the church of Rome is one among several patriarchal sister churches, generally fear that if either of those things were true, the unicity of the Church would be compromised and the Roman primacy rendered ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F. Taft, S.J. the 2001 Vatican Addai and Mari Decision
    Robert F. Taft, S.J. Pontificio Istituto Orientale Piazza S, Maria Maggiore 7 00185 Rome ITALY PROFILE : Robert F. Taft, S.J., born in Providence, RI (USA) Jan. 9, 1932, entered the Society of Jesus on August 14, 1949. After receiving the MA and Licentiate in Philosophy, he taught from 1956-59 at Baghdad College, Baghdad, Iraq, followed by an MA in Russian Studies at Fordham University in NY (1961), and an MA and STL in theology in 1964. He was ordained to the priesthood in the Byzantine Slavonic (Russian) Rite in 1963. He is Professor- emeritus of Oriental Liturgy at the Pontifical Oriental Institute, Rome, and founder and editor-in-chief of its Anaphorae Orientales series. He studied there his doctorate (1965-70), then did postdoctoral studies in Oriental Philology at the University of Louvain (1971-72). The bibliography of his publications and writings comprises over 800 titles written in English, French, and Italian, mostly scholarly publications on Eastern Liturgy, including 23 books, three of them co-authored. His writings have been translated into eighteen different languages. Fr. Taft is also Consultor for Liturgy of the Vatican Congregation for the Oriental Churches, and a member of several Vatican commissions and other editorial and advisory boards. Fr. Taft has received numerous ecclesiastical honors and academic awards, including three honorary doctorates and election as Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy, the highest honor the Academy confers in recognition of scholarly distinction. He is the first American Jesuit
    [Show full text]
  • Orientalium Ecclesiarum- Vatican Ii Decree
    ——————————————— Second Vatican council ORIENTALIUM ECCLESIARUM DECREE ON THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES OF THE EASTERN RITE ——————————————— The integrity of the original document was not compromised while being copied in its entirety from the Vati- can website link below. The print has been enhanced and the document has been formatted with wide left margins, suitable for printing, 3 hole punching and placement into your personal “Faith Library!” Spread the Good News about the Catholic Church! http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_orientalium- ecclesiarum_en.html http://goodshepherddet.com/vatican-ii 1 DECREE ON THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES OF THE EASTERN RITE ORIENTALIUM ECCLESIARUM SOLEMNLY PROMULGATED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI ON NOVEMBER 21, 1964 PREAMBLE 1. The Catholic Church holds in high esteem the institutions, liturgical rites, ecclesiastical traditions and the established standards of the Christian life of the Eastern Churches, for in them, distinguished as they are for their venerable antiquity, there remains conspicuous the tradition that has been handed down from the Apos- tles through the Fathers (1) and that forms part of the divinely revealed and undivided heritage of the univer- sal Church. This Sacred Ecumenical Council, therefore, in its care for the Eastern Churches which bear living witness to this tradition, in order that they may flourish and with new apostolic vigor execute the task en- trusted to them, has determined to lay down a number of principles, in addition to those which refer to the universal Church; all else is remitted to the care of the Eastern synods and of the Holy See. THE INDIVIDUAL CHURCHES OR RITES 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Aspects of the Relationship Between the Patriarch and the Synod of Bishops in a Patriarchal Church
    CANONICAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS IN A PATRIARCHAL CHURCH by James SALAMY Research Seminar – DCA 6395 Prof. John HUELS Faculty of Canon Law Saint Paul University Ottawa 2018 © James Salamy_2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – A PERICHORESIS OF THE ONE AND THE MANY ........................................................1 1.1 – Practical Advantages .........................................................................................................1 1.2 – Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1.2.1 – Patriarch ...................................................................................................................1 1.2.2 – Synod of Bishops .....................................................................................................8 2 – THE POWERS OF THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS ..................12 2.1 – Intermediate Authority ....................................................................................................12 2.2 – In Relation to the Patriarchal Territory ...........................................................................15 2.2.1 – Inside the Patriarchal Territory ..............................................................................19 2.2.2 – Outside of the Patriarchal Territory .......................................................................27 3 – THE ALLOCATION OF POWER ......................................................................................32
    [Show full text]