Effects of Libby Dam, Habitat, and an Invasive Diatom

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Libby Dam, Habitat, and an Invasive Diatom EFFECTS OF LIBBY DAM, HABITAT, AND AN INVASIVE DIATOM, DIDYMOSPHENIA GEMINATA, ON BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES OF THE KOOTENAI RIVER, MONTANA Prepared by Brett D. Marshall, M.Sc. Prepared for: Montana Division of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, FWP Region 1 Headquarters 490 North Meridian Road Kalispell, MT 59901 April 2007 Version 2.1 1 - - - CONTENTS - - - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Background.............................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Scientific Rationale for Additional Research below Libby Dam......................................................................... 7 2. METHODS................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Study Sites.............................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Laboratory Analysis............................................................................................................................................... 15 2.4. Data Analysis-Supporting data and covariates................................................................................................... 16 2.5. Data Analysis-Qualitative Macroinvertebrate Abundances.............................................................................. 17 2.6. Data Analysis-Quantitative Macroinvertebrate Abundances............................................................................ 17 2.7. Data Analysis-Quantitative Macroinvertebrate Community Function............................................................18 2.8. Data Analysis-Quantitative Response to D. geminata........................................................................................ 21 3. RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Supporting field data and Covariates................................................................................................................... 23 3.2. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Overview ................................................................................................ 26 3.3. Results-Qualitative Macroinvertebrate Abundances ......................................................................................... 27 3.4. Results-Quantitative Macroinvertebrate Abundances....................................................................................... 36 3.5. Results-Quantitative Macroinvertebrate Community Function ....................................................................... 41 3.6. The Role of Habitat and D. geminata .................................................................................................................. 49 3.7. Data Analysis-Quantitative Response to D. geminata........................................................................................ 53 3.7. Results summary ................................................................................................................................................... 58 4.0 IMPLICATIONS OF D. GEMINATA FOR THE KOOTENAI RIVER .......................... 63 5.0 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................ 68 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We collected benthic macroinvertebrate and algae samples from five locations below Libby Dam, along with ancillary habitat data. Our goals were: (1) to assess changes in benthic community structure downstream from Libby Dam, (2) to assess the effects of the invasive algae Didymosphenia geminata on benthic assemblages and (3) to make recommendations for natural resource management based upon our findings and those of others. We developed a study design to maximize the potential uses of the data. One of FWP’s priorities was to keep the sites and methods consistent with earlier river surveys (Perry et al. 1987, Hauer and Stanford 1997). We also wanted to quantify downstream gradients in community structure below the dam (something that earlier surveys failed to do with their qualitative analysis). In addition, we wanted to use the samples to quantify the effects of D. geminata—independent of dam-related station effects. We had a limited budget with which to generate a data set to support all these uses. We ultimately used a sampling method that used the same basic field methods as earlier studies (Perry et al. 1987, Hauer and Stanford 1997), but used a flow-standardized stratified sampling design. This allowed us to reduce unwanted variation among samples (increasing statistical power and reducing the required sampling effort), and to use a General Linear Modeling (GLM) to adjust benthic response-variable means for the variation related to physical habitat (flow, substrate, algae). Thus the same range of near-substrate flow velocities were sampled at each of the five study sites used by earlier investigators. We found that Libby Dam continues to exert a major influence on the structure and function of downstream benthic food webs. However, community dissimilarity analysis suggested that the direct influence of Libby Dam was somewhat less intense than indicated by sampling in the 1990’s (Hauer and Stanford 1997). This could be due to (1) landscape or climate changes that are unrelated to the dam, to (2) homogenizing habitat quality by D. geminata coating the substrata and reducing diversity in community composition, to (3) changing river-flow management, or because (4) we sampled the same flow velocity at all sites (earlier investigators did not control this variable nor did they correlate it with the macroinvertebrates). The reality is probably that a combination of all these factors reduced the effect of dam-related changes in benthic community structure. This does not account for the long-term effects of the dam and reservoir as a potential nutrient sink. We ran GLM stepwise procedures with all the habitat variables except for epilithic biomass (which was primarily D. geminata growth). We found that for most response variables, some 3 variation could be significantly explained by habitat variables. When we added the average Ash- free-dry-mass (AFDM) of epilithon as a covariate and re-ran the stepwise analysis, we found this term explained more variation in any other habitat variable. After AFDM variation was explained the treatment “SITE“ no longer significantly explained variation. This indicates that many aspects of community structure were strongly correlated with the thickness of epilithic biofilms. It is noteworthy that this variable explained more variation than flow—which often accounts for the most spatial variation in community structure within a riffle (e.g., Hart and Fonseca 1995). Both shredders and scrapers feed upon biofilm-colonized substrata. Therefore we expected that changes in the quantity or quality of biofilms could affect the success (and thereby abundance) of these two functional feeding groups. These taxa should be less common in areas of very low epilithic growth than in areas with moderate growth. In the case of the Kootenai River and the spread of D. geminata, biofilms are likely to become sufficiently thick as to interfere with feeding and mobility of these taxa (many of which are clingers). Therefore we performed a nonlinear regression to fit a dose-response curve for the abundance of scrapers and shredders relative to the mass of epilithic biofilms. We identified a threshold level of epilithic biofilms which should not be exceeded to maintain natural ecosystem function. Concentrations of organic material exceeding 8mg/cm2, completely excluded shredders and dramatically reduced scrapers. The abundance of these important taxa began declining at organic biofilms concentrations between 3-5 mg/cm2. Ideal production of these important links to higher trophic levels should occur at concentrations less than 5 mg/cm2. The factors contributing to population explosions (blooms) of D. geminata are not understood. The phenomenon began occurring all over the northern hemisphere in the late 1980’s and coincided with dramatic reductions in stratospheric ozone levels and marked increases in the amount of ultra-violet radiation reaching the earth’s surface. Controlled field and laboratory investigations should provide greater insight into the factors contributing to the growth of D. geminata—and help determine which factors can be controlled and which cannot. The abundance of oligochaete worms was strongly correlated with D. geminata concentrations, and could increase the exposure risk of some fishes to the parasite Myxobolus cerebralis—the organism responsible for whirling disease. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people assisted this project along the way. First I gratefully thank the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP), especially Jim Dunnigan, for funding and initiating this study. The field and laboratory aspects of the study were conducted by EcoAnalysts, Inc. (EAI). Some of the EAI members that specifically helped the project included: Gary Lester, Scott Lindstrom,
Recommended publications
  • Libby, Montana
    NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 31st Annual Field Conference Libby, Montana August 3-6, 2006 Published by The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 http://trgs.org Edited by: Richard I. Gibson and Robert C. Thomas Cover: Miners, Snowshoe Gulch, 1897. From Mrs. Sam Ratekin and Spokane Statesman-Review, 1959. Above: Cross section based on gravity modeling. From M.D. Kleinkopf, Geophysical Interpretations of the Libby Thrust Belt, U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 1546, 1997. The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 Officers, 2006: President: Larry Smith, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte Vice-President: James Sears, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Secretary-Treasurer: George Furniss, MT Dept. of Environmental Quality, Helena Corresponding Secretary: Emily Geraghty, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Webmaster: Dick Gibson Board of Directors, 2006: Richard B. Berg, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Richard I. Gibson, Gibson Consulting, Butte, MT Larry Johnson, Consultant, Missoula, MT Robert C. Thomas, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, U. of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT Conference Organizers, Libby Field Conference: Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Ann Marie Gooden, Libby, MT ISSN: 0096-7769 © 2006 The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. http://trgs.org ii NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 Libby Field Conference Table of Contents Author Page Title Montana DEQ 1 Libby District Historical Mine Narrative Art Montana 11 The Rainy Creek alkaline ultramafic igneous complex near Libby, MT Montana DEQ 17 Rainy Creek Historical Mine Narrative Derek L.
    [Show full text]
  • Didymo Summary
    An Assessment and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities Associated with the Appearance of Didymosphenia geminata in the White River Below BullShoals Dam February 22, 2006 An Assessment and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities Associated with the Appearance of Didymosphenia geminata in the White River Below Bull Shoals Dam A Summary Report of Findings Prepared and Submitted by Erica L. Shelby Water Use & Resource Specialist Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Planning Division Final Draft February 24, 2006 1 An Assessment and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities Associated with the Appearance of Didymosphenia geminata in the White River Below BullShoals Dam February 22, 2006 Table of Contents Executive Summary: ……………………………………………………………….. Purpose of Study: ......................................................................................................... Location of Study Area, Sampling Locations, and Physical Descriptions ................ Methods of Investigation: …………………………………………………………… Physical & Chemical Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates ................….. Physical & Chemical Water Quality Analysis ................................................................ Description of Macroinvertebrate Metrics ....................................................... Macroinvertebrate Results .................................................................................. Macroinvertebrate Analysis Summary………………………………………………… Discussion ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed
    BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY MINISTRY OF ENERGY, MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES LAKE KOOCANUSA HIGH LEVEL ASSESSMENT OF A PROPOSED DAM FINAL DRAFT PROJECT NO.: 0466001 DATE: November 19, 2020 BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 November 19, 2020 Project No.: 0466001 Kathy Eichenberger, Executive Director Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources PO Box 9314, Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9N1 Dear Kathy, Re: Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT BGC is pleased to provide the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources with the following FINAL DRAFT report. The report details an assessment of a proposed dam on Lake Koocanusa, in southeastern British Columbia. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 604-629-3850. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Hamish Weatherly, M.Sc., P.Geo. Principal Hydrologist Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Lake Koocanusa November 19, 2020 High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT Project No.: 0466001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Libby Dam is a 129 m high concrete gravity dam located on the Kootenay River near Libby, Montana. The dam was completed in 1973 and was first filled in 1974, inundating the Kootenay River valley to form the 145 km long Koocanusa Reservoir (Lake Koocanusa). Canadian residents and water users are affected by changes in the Libby Dam operations that affect reservoir water levels, as nearly half (70 km) of the reservoir extends into southeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review 1 he Columbia River Treaty History of the Treaty T between the United States and The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual fl ow, Canada has served as a model of generates more power than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British international cooperation since 1964, Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River Basin is actually bringing signifi cant fl ood control and located in Canada. Yet the Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, power generation benefi ts to both and up to 50 percent of the peak fl ood waters, that fl ow by The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River countries. Either Canada or the United between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, offi cials from the United States and States can terminate most of the Canada began a long process to seek a joint solution to the fl ooding caused by the unregulated Columbia provisions of the Treaty any time on or River and to the postwar demand for greater energy resources. That effort culminated in the Columbia River after Sept.16, 2024, with a minimum Treaty, an international agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development 10 years’ written advance notice. The of water resources regulation in the upper Columbia River U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Framework for Management of Aquatic Invasive Species of Concern for Yukon: Literature Review, Risk Assessment and Recommendations
    DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR YUKON: LITERATURE REVIEW, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared by: Maria Leung and Al von Finster Prepared for: Fish and Wildlife Branch, Environment Yukon April 2016 DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR YUKON: LITERATURE REVIEW, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch MRC-14-01 Maria Leung and Al von Finster prepared the report under contract to Environment Yukon. This report and its conclusions are not necessarily the opinion of Environment Yukon and this work does not constitute any commitment of Government of Yukon. © 2016 Yukon Department of Environment Copies available from: Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch, V-5A Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Phone (867) 667-5721, Fax (867) 393-6263 Email: [email protected] Also available online at www.env.gov.yk.ca Suggested citation: LEUNG M. AND A. VON FINSTER. 2016. Development of a framework for management of aquatic invasive species of concern for Yukon: Literature review, risk assessment and recommendations. Prepared for Environment Yukon. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report MRC-14-01, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. Preface Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) are non-native aquatic species that have a detrimental impact on environments that they invade. In Canada, millions of dollars are spent each year on control alone. From experiences across the country and around the world, experts have found that strategies aimed at preventing the spread of AIS are preferable to diverting financial resources to programs aimed at managing AIS after they have established.
    [Show full text]
  • Didymosphenia Geminata on Benthic Community Resource Use Natalie E
    Effects of the nuisance alga Didymosphenia geminata on benthic community resource use Natalie E. Knorp and Justin N. Murdock School of Environmental Studies and Department of Biology Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, TN Introduction Results Results • Didymosphenia geminata is a diatom that has reached Stable Isotope Analysis 1 nuisance biomass levels in streams worldwide. It can form Macroinvertebrates mats that blanket stream bottoms (Fig. 1), which may reduce • In 2014, macroinvertebrates in the South Holston and Watauga 2 food availability to all parts of the stream food web. Rivers were switching from a variety of food resources at low D. • Stable isotopes are used in food web analyses to asses which geminata biomass sites to filamentous algae or macrophytes at food resources are being assimilated into consumer tissues. high biomass sites. Resource switching was not observed in the 13 Organism tissues are generally similar in their C values Clinch River where overall biomass was low (Fig. 2). 15 compared to their food resources, while N values tend to • Resource use patterns were harder to distinguish in 2015. Most 3 increase in a predictable pattern from food to consumers. macroinvertebrates were feeding on a variety of food resources. • Additional food web information can be gained from lipid (fatty • In both years, macroinvertebrate groups from both high and low acid) analysis. Consumers obtain fatty acids directly from their biomass sites were assimilating D. geminata cells and/or stalks. 4 food sources , so consumer Fish lipid composition should match • Both trout species mainly consumed amphipods and their food resources. turbellarians, but also D. geminata at all sites sampled.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Withdrawal Impact of the Libby Dam Project on Local Government Administration Lincoln County Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1975 Analysis of the withdrawal impact of the Libby Dam project on local government administration Lincoln County Montana Richard D. Gillmore The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gillmore, Richard D., "Analysis of the withdrawal impact of the Libby Dam project on local government administration Lincoln County Montana" (1975). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5135. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5135 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF THE WITHDRAWAL IMPACT OF THE LIBBY DAM PROJECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION: LINCOLN COUNTY, MONTANA By Richard D. Gillmore B.A., Western Washington State College, 1972 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1975 Approved byi Chairman, Board of Examiners __ Deg^l, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP40599 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Water Quality and Survivability Of
    THESIS WATER QUALITY AND SURVIVABILITY OF DIDYMOSPHENIA GEMINATA Submitted by Johannes Beeby Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Master’s Committee: Advisor: John D. Stednick Co-Advisor: Steven R. Fassnacht William H. Clements ABSTRACT WATER QUALITY AND SURVIVABILITY OF DIDYMOSPHENIA GEMINATA Didymosphenia geminata or Didymo has become a world-wide invasive aquatic species. During blooms, the algae can form thick mats covering entire reaches of stream bottom, which in turn creates negative aesthetic, ecologic, and economic impacts. Although Didymo is historically present in the United States, it is spreading quickly into areas that were previously free of it, and is even growing in waters that were thought not ideal habitat for Didymo. Previous research on how water quality affects Didymo growth and spreading appear to be influenced by streamflow rates and water pH levels. Other water quality parameters have not been fully tested on Didymo, which would contribute to a better understanding of what controls Didymo growth. The first goal of this study was to colonize Didymo in an artificial stream within a laboratory setting. The second goal was to evaluate the survivability of Didymo by exposing it to different water quality parameters. Artificial stream configurations with various light intensity and duration, water temperature and velocity, source water chemistry, and different growth media were used. In all attempts colonization of Didymo was unsuccessful as Didymo slowly deteriorated and became covered by other algae that were more successful in the artificial conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Libby Dam Information Brief Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee and CRT Local Governments’ Committee Kootenay System Workshop
    Libby Dam Information Brief Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee and CRT Local Governments’ Committee Kootenay System Workshop Kristian Mickelson, PE Seattle District 09 March 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Executive Summary . Purpose: Inform the Kootenay Basin stakeholders about multi- purpose Libby Dam operations in the context of an interstate & international watershed . BLUF: Libby Dam & Koocanusa Reservoir fulfill 5-purposes (hydro, flood risk, fish/wildlife, recreation, navigation) purposes while meeting environmental requirements in the international Kootenai River watershed of the upper Columbia Basin . Key points: 1. Complex – only Corps dam w/upstream & downstream international impacts 2. CRT & IJC framework drive international interaction 3. Significant Endangered Species Act considerations (NOAA BiOp = salmon & steelhead; USFWS BiOp = sturgeon & bull trout) 2 BUILDING STRONG® Columbia Basin Map Libby Dam 3 BUILDING STRONG® International Interests & Concerns Upstream/Lake Koocanusa Downstream/Border & . US Kootenay Lake ► Lake Recreation . US • Access for boats – Lake is too low ► Flood Control (Bonners Ferry, • Marina Beaches inundated if ID) reservoir is too high (2459 ft) ► Fishery – ESA listed species ► Air Quality – Dust if lake is low ► Levee sloughing and saturation . Canada ► Seepage of farmlands in ► Lake Recreation Kootenai Flats (Northern Idaho) • Max elevation of Libby Dam is 2459 ft per Columbia River Treaty . Canada • Access for boats – Lake is too low ► Kootenay Lake Lake does not reach Canada until • Elevation (1755 ft) – Flood Control elevation 2420 ft • Beaches inundates if reservoir is at • Power generation – Flows in winter 2459 ft ► Levee slough and saturation ► Air Quality – Dust if lake is low ► Farmland Seepage 4 BUILDING STRONG® Libby Dam Regulation - General Governing Statutes, Treaties, Executive Orders, guidance: .
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental DNA Genetic Monitoring of the Nuisance
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2017) 1–13 BIODIVERSITY Environmental DNA genetic monitoring RESEARCH of the nuisance freshwater diatom, Didymosphenia geminata, in eastern North American streams Stephen R. Keller1* , Robert H. Hilderbrand1, Matthew K. Shank2 and Marina Potapova3 1Department of Plant Biology, University of ABSTRACT Vermont, 63 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT Aim Establishing the distribution and diversity of populations in the early 05405, USA, 2Susequehanna River Basin stages of invasion when populations are at low abundance is a core challenge Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110, USA, 3Academy of for conservation biologists. Recently, genetic monitoring for environmental Natural Sciences, Drexel University, 1900 DNA (eDNA) has become an effective approach for the early detection of inva- Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, ders, especially for microscopic organisms where visual detection is challenging. PA 19103, USA Didymosphenia geminata is a globally distributed freshwater diatom that shows a recent emergence of nuisance blooms, but whose native versus exotic status in different areas has been debated. We address the hypothesis that the distri- bution and genetic diversity of D. geminata in eastern North America is related to the recent introduction of non-native lineages, and contrast that with the alternative hypothesis that D. geminata is cryptically native to the region (i.e. at low abundance) and only forms nuisance blooms when triggered by a change in environment. Location The Mid-Atlantic region of North America. Methods We analysed 118 stream samples for D. geminata eDNA, validated our results for a subset of sites using direct visual enumeration by microscopy and used molecular cloning to sequence D.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Impacts to Channel Bed Mobility Due to Flow Regulation, Kootenai River, Usa
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF IMPACTS TO CHANNEL BED MOBILITY DUE TO FLOW REGULATION, KOOTENAI RIVER, USA Michael Burke1, Research Associate, University of Idaho ([email protected]); Klaus Jorde1, Professor, University of Idaho; John M. Buffington1,2, Research Geomorphologist, USDA Forest Service; Jeffrey H. Braatne3, Assistant Professor, University of Idaho; Rohan Benjankar1, Research Associate, University of Idaho. 1Center for Ecohydraulics Research, Boise, ID 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 3College of Natural Resources, Moscow, ID Abstract The regulated hydrograph of the Kootenai River between Libby Dam and Kootenay Lake has altered the natural flow regime, resulting in a significant decrease in maximum flows (60% net reduction in median 1-day annual maximum, and 77%-84% net reductions in median monthly flows for the historic peak flow months of May and June, respectively). Other key hydrologic characteristics have also been affected, such as the timing of annual extremes, and the frequency and duration of flow pulses. Moreover, Libby Dam has impeded downstream delivery of sediment from the upper 23,300 km2 of a 50,000 km2 watershed. Since completion of the facility in 1974, observed impacts to downstream channel bed and bars in semi-confined and confined reaches of the Kootenai River have included coarsening of the active channel bed, homogenization of the channel bed, disappearance of relatively fine-grained beach bars, and invasion of bar surfaces by perennial vegetative species. These impacts have led to reduced aquatic habitat heterogeneity and reduced abundance of candidate recruitment sites for riparian tree species such as black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and native willows (Salix spp.). Limited quantitative documentation of the pre-regulation substrate composition exists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canada-United States Controversy Over the Columbia River
    Washington Law Review Volume 41 Number 4 8-1-1966 The Canada-United States Controversy over the Columbia River Ralph W. Johnson University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Ralph W. Johnson, The Canada-United States Controversy over the Columbia River, 41 Wash. L. Rev. 676 (1966). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol41/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CANADA-UNITED STATES CONTROVERSY OVER THE COLUMBIA RIVERf RALPH W. JOHNSON* In a comprehensive study of the recent dispute between Canada and the United States over the Columbia River, Professor Johnson traces its history through the birth of the Harmon doctrine in 1898, the signing of the Boundary Waters Treaty in 1909, and the first Canadianclaim to downstream benefits in the early 1950's. Against this background, he analyzes the negotiations and events-particu- larly the Canadianproposals to divert the Columbia into the Fraser, and to develop the Peace River instead of the Columbia-that culmi- nated in the Columbia River Treaty in 1961. Before Canadian ratification of the Treaty, however, additional problems presented by the split between the Provincial and National governments had to be resolved. Their resolution brought about the signing of a Protocol with the United States in 1964, as well as ratification of the Treaty.
    [Show full text]