DOCSLIB.ORG

The Canada-United States Controversy Over the Columbia River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Canada-United States Controversy Over the Columbia River Washington Law Review Volume 41 Number 4 8-1-1966 The Canada-United States Controversy over the Columbia River Ralph W. Johnson University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Ralph W. Johnson, The Canada-United States Controversy over the Columbia River, 41 Wash. L. Rev. 676 (1966). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol41/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CANADA-UNITED STATES CONTROVERSY OVER THE COLUMBIA RIVERf RALPH W. JOHNSON* In a comprehensive study of the recent dispute between Canada and the United States over the Columbia River, Professor Johnson traces its history through the birth of the Harmon doctrine in 1898, the signing of the Boundary Waters Treaty in 1909, and the first Canadianclaim to downstream benefits in the early 1950's. Against this background, he analyzes the negotiations and events-particu- larly the Canadianproposals to divert the Columbia into the Fraser, and to develop the Peace River instead of the Columbia-that culmi- nated in the Columbia River Treaty in 1961. Before Canadian ratification of the Treaty, however, additional problems presented by the split between the Provincial and National governments had to be resolved. Their resolution brought about the signing of a Protocol with the United States in 1964, as well as ratification of the Treaty. Finally, Professor Johnson comments on the benefits accruing to each nation from the Treaty and its potential impact on future Canadian-UnitedStates relations. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......... .................... 680 I. The Columbia Basin A. The River ......... .................. 682 B. Climate in the Basin ....... ............... 684 tIt is with pleasure that the author acknowledges the extensive help graciously offered by Dr. W. R. D. Sewell, formerly an economist with the Water Resources Branch of the Canadian Federal Government and now at the University of Chicago, who rendered invaluable counsel in finding and evaluating material and in reviewing drafts; Dr. Gilbert F. White of the Geography Department of the University of Chicago, and Professor Charles B. Bourne of the Law Faculty of the University of British Columbia, both of whom carefully read the text and lent their wide knowledge and experience to helpful critiques; Dr. Marion Marts, Vice Provost of the Univer- sity of Washington, and the late Mr. Douglas Turner, Canadian Consul in Seattle, who offered many helpful suggestions. Lastly, the author was relieved of much of the painstaking detail work by the competent assistance of Mr. Russell A. Austin, Jr. and Mr. Peter Judd, then third year students at the Law School of the University of Washington. * Professor of Law, University of Washington. Member, Washington and Oregon State Bar Associations. B.S., University of Oregon, 1947; LL.B., University of Oregon, 1949; Diploma, Hague Academy of International Law, Center for Studies and Research, 1961. Ford Foundation Grantee, Europe, 10 months, 1961-1962, research on International River law. [ 6761 19661 CONTROVERSY OVER THE COLUMBIA C. Economy and Population of the Region ............ 685 D. Power ....... .................... 686 E. Irrigation . 688 F. Commercial Fishery ..... .............. 689 G. Navigation . 689 H. Flood Control ...... ................ 690 I. Recreation . 690 II. Early History A. Discovery of the Columbia ..... ............. 691 B. The Boundary Dispute, 1812-1846 ... .......... 692 C. The Post Treaty Period, 1846-1944 .. ........... 694 D. The 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty ... .......... 694 1. Introduction ...... ................ 694 2. Prior Treaties . 695 3. The 1895 Dispute with Mexico--The Harmon Doctrine 696 4. Existing Water Disputes with Canada .. ........ 698 5. Birth of the Joint Commission Idea ... ........ 699 6. The International Waterways Commission, 1905-1909 . 700 7. Negotiations Toward the Treaty ... .......... 702 8. Interpretation of Article II .... ............ 706 9. The Boundary Waters Treaty Provisions ......... 708 III. The 1944 Reference A. The Background ..... ................ 711 B. Possible Advantages from Joint Development ......... 712 C. Signs of the Coming Storm-the Libby Dam Proposal 713 D. Kaiser Aluminum-Arrow Lakes Dam Proposal .... 715 E. Puget Sound Utilities Council-Mica Dam Proposal . 715 F. International River Improvements Act, 1955 ......... 716 IV. The Fraser Diversion Scheme A. Impact of Diversion on the United States . 717 B. Legal Arguments .............. @ @ t 6 718 1. The Canadian View .... ........ 718 2. The American View ........ 719 3. Canadian Rebuttal ... .......... 720 4. Additional Arguments-Both Sides . 721 C. Comment on Legal Arguments ........ 724 V. The Peace River Alternative A. Progress Toward Agreement ......... 727 WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW [VOL., 41 : 676 VI. The Engineering Report, April 1959 A. Introduction ..... ............ 729 B. The Board's Findings ........ 729 1. Plan No. 1, Non-Diversion ......... 731 2. Plan No. 2, Copper Creek Diversion . 733 3. Plan No. 3, Dorr Diversion ......... 733 4. Power Generation Possibilities ........ 733 5. Flood Control Possibilities ......... 735 C. Reaction to the Report ... ......... 735 VII. The Principles of Apportionment A. Introduction ..... ............ 736 B. The Principles .... ............ 737 C. Reaction to the Principles .. ........ 737 VIII. The Treaty A. Negotiations ..... ............ 739 B. Summary of the Treaty ... ......... 740 C. The United States Ratifies the Treaty . 742 D. Criticism from the United States Side . 743 E. Reaction in Canada ... .......... 744 F. The British Columbia-Ottawa Impasse . 744 1. Background .......... 744 2. The Issues .... ............ 746 3. Premier Bennett's Strategy ....... 747 4. Agreement is Reached .. ........ 748 IX. The Protocol A. Its Terms ..... .............. 749 B. Action Required in the United States . 751 1. Northwest to California Power Intertie . 751 2. United States Financing of Power Purchase 751 X. The Treaty Goes To Parliament A. McNaughton Opposes ........ • 9 • 4 752 B. Other Objectors .......... • 6 • Q 756 C. The Treaty is Approved ............ 6 Q O 756 XI. Summary and Conclusions A. The Basin Approach to River Development . 761 B. The Role of the International Joint Commission. 762 C. The Future ..... .............. 763 19661 CONTROVERSY OVER THE COLUMBIA 679 NORTHERN PORTION ol COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN ALBERTA WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW [VoL. 41 : 676 INTRODUCTION The Columbia River dispute is settled. The Columbia River Treaty and Protocol of October 1964, which closed the dispute, stand as major achievements in the joint development of a great international river. The culmination of twenty years of studies, investigations, and negotia- tions, these documents embody important new principles, likely to exert a profound influence on the development of international rivers throughout the world. The Treaty ended one of the bitterest debates ever waged between Canada and the United States. The record of these debates runs to many thousands of pages and covers virtually every conceivable aspect of engineering, economic, legal, hydrological, and geographical data that could be unearthed. Few, if any, international river conflicts ever have been examined so thoroughly, debated so vigorously, or written about so fully. It is partly because of the mass of this data that this study has been undertaken. Its principal objective is to present an orderly analysis of he Columbia River conflict, noting the influence of various legal, political, and economic factors in determining the eventual outcome. It starts with a brief resum6 of the historical and geographical back- ground, pointing out especially the influence of the important 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty. It then traces the dispute from the 1944 reference of the joint development issue to the International Joint Coimission, through the settlement embodied in the 1961 Treaty and 1.964 Protocol. The study also examines the implications of the Colum- bia River case for development of international rivers elsewhere. 'At the time of this writing joint development of the River is moving ead rapidly. The broad outlines of the plan can be easily traced. Canada has agreed to build several large storage reservoirs on the tpper Columbia, in Canada, to capture the flooding spring waters and hold them for gradual release throughout the low-flow months of the year. This levelling will make possible the generation of much more power in the United States than was possible previously, when the River fluctuated so radically. The storage will also reduce the risk of floods downstream in the United States. In return, Canada will become entitled to one-half the additional power generated in the United States as a result of this levelling process. Canada has agreed to sell its downstream-power-entitlement to the United States for the first thirty years, and has already received CONTROVERSY OVER THE COLUMBIA the sale price of 254 million dollars. In addition Canada will receive from the United States cash payments over the life of the Treaty for the flood control benefits bestowed on the latter country. Several important generalizations can be made from this controversy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bathymetry, Morphology, and Lakebed Geologic Characteristics
    SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3272 Bathymetry, Morphology, and Lakebed Geologic Characteristics Barton, G.J., and Dux, A.M., 2013, Bathymetry, Morphology, and Lakebed Geologic Characteristics of Potential U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Kokanee Salmon Spawning Habitat in Lake Pend Oreille, Bayview and Lakeview Quadrangles, Idaho science for a changing world U.S. Geological Survey IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Abstract lake level of 2,062.5 ft above NGVD 1929 (figs. 4–6) has been maintained during the summer (normal maximum summer full Scenic Bay, includes 254 acres and 2.8 mi of shoreline bordered by a gentle-to-moderate-sloping landscape and steep mountains. Methods conditions vary within each study unit: 2,100 photographs were subsampled for Scenic Bay, 1,710 photographs were subsampled lake morphology, lakebed geologic units, and substrate embeddedness. Descriptions of the morphology, lakebed geology, and pool), with drawdowns in autumn to reach a minimum winter level. Before 1966, the winter lake level was variable, and an A second study unit, along the north shore of Idlewild Bay, includes 220 acres and 2.2 mi of shoreline bordered by a gentle-to- for Idlewild Bay, and 245 photographs were subsampled for Echo Bay. These photographs were reviewed, and additional embeddedness in the shore zone, rise zone, and open water in bays and the main stem of the lake are provided in figures 5–6. Kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) are a keystone species in Lake Pend Oreille in northern Idaho, historically exceptional fishery continued with the Albeni Falls Dam in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Status and Trends Report for the Strait of Georgia Ecozone
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/010 Document de recherche 2010/010 Ecosystem Status and Trends Report Rapport de l’état des écosystèmes et for the Strait of Georgia Ecozone des tendances pour l’écozone du détroit de Georgie Sophia C. Johannessen and Bruce McCarter Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Institute of Ocean Sciences 9860 W. Saanich Rd. P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, B.C. V8L 4B2 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle the day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Highlights 1 Drivers of change 2 Status and trends indicators 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Change on the Columbia Plateau 1750-1840 Columbia Magazine, Winter 1996-97: Vol
    Trade and Change on the Columbia Plateau 1750-1840 Columbia Magazine, Winter 1996-97: Vol. 10, No. 4 By Laura Peers Early Europeans saw the Columbia Plateau as a walled fortress, isolated and virtually impossible to penetrate through the Rocky Mountain and Cascade ranges that formed its outer defenses. Fur traders and missionaries saw it as a last frontier, virgin and unspoiled. But this was an outsider's view. To the native people of the region, the Plateau was the center of the world, linked to the four corners of the continent by well-worn paths and a dense social and economic network. In fact, the Plateau was a crossroads for trade, one that became increasingly busy between 1750 and 1850. During this pivotal century, the quickening pace of trade became an uncontrolled torrent, a flash flood of new goods, new ideas and new diseases, an explosion of change, sometimes beneficial and sometimes deadly. By the late prehistoric era there were two major trade centers on the Plateau: at The Dalles, on the middle Columbia River, and at Kettle Falls, several hundred miles away on the upper Columbia. Members of tribes from across the Plateau and from the West Coast to the Missouri River converged on these sites every year. An astonishing quantity and variety of goods were exchanged at these sites, including dried fish from the Columbia; baskets, woven bags and wild hemp for fishnets from the Plateau region; shells, whale and seal oil and bone from the West Coast; pipestone, bison robes and feather headdresses from the Plains; and nuts and roots from as far away as California.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Overview
    HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT The following is a brief history of Oregon City. The intent is to provide a general overview, rather than a comprehensive history. Setting Oregon City, the county seat of Clackamas County, is located southeast of Portland on the east side of the Willamette River, just below the falls. Its unique topography includes three terraces, which rise above the river, creating an elevation range from about 50 feet above sea level at the riverbank to more than 250 feet above sea level on the upper terrace. The lowest terrace, on which the earliest development occurred, is only two blocks or three streets wide, but stretches northward from the falls for several blocks. Originally, industry was located primarily at the south end of Main Street nearest the falls, which provided power. Commercial, governmental and social/fraternal entities developed along Main Street north of the industrial area. Religious and educational structures also appeared along Main Street, but tended to be grouped north of the commercial core. Residential structures filled in along Main Street, as well as along the side and cross streets. As the city grew, the commercial, governmental and social/fraternal structures expanded northward first, and with time eastward and westward to the side and cross streets. Before the turn of the century, residential neighborhoods and schools were developing on the bluff. Some commercial development also occurred on this middle terrace, but the business center of the city continued to be situated on the lower terrace. Between the 1930s and 1950s, many of the downtown churches relocated to the bluff as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Libby, Montana
    NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 31st Annual Field Conference Libby, Montana August 3-6, 2006 Published by The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 http://trgs.org Edited by: Richard I. Gibson and Robert C. Thomas Cover: Miners, Snowshoe Gulch, 1897. From Mrs. Sam Ratekin and Spokane Statesman-Review, 1959. Above: Cross section based on gravity modeling. From M.D. Kleinkopf, Geophysical Interpretations of the Libby Thrust Belt, U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 1546, 1997. The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 Officers, 2006: President: Larry Smith, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte Vice-President: James Sears, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Secretary-Treasurer: George Furniss, MT Dept. of Environmental Quality, Helena Corresponding Secretary: Emily Geraghty, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Webmaster: Dick Gibson Board of Directors, 2006: Richard B. Berg, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Richard I. Gibson, Gibson Consulting, Butte, MT Larry Johnson, Consultant, Missoula, MT Robert C. Thomas, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, U. of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT Conference Organizers, Libby Field Conference: Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Ann Marie Gooden, Libby, MT ISSN: 0096-7769 © 2006 The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. http://trgs.org ii NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 Libby Field Conference Table of Contents Author Page Title Montana DEQ 1 Libby District Historical Mine Narrative Art Montana 11 The Rainy Creek alkaline ultramafic igneous complex near Libby, MT Montana DEQ 17 Rainy Creek Historical Mine Narrative Derek L.
    [Show full text]
  • Wapiti River Water Management Plan Summary
    Wapiti River Water Management Plan Summary Wapiti River Water Management Plan Steering Committee February 2020 Summary The Wapiti River basin lies within the larger Smoky/Wapiti basin of the Peace River watershed. Of all basins in the Peace River watershed, the Wapiti basin has the highest concentration and diversity of human water withdrawals and municipal and industrial wastewater discharges. The Wapiti River Water Management Plan (the Plan) was developed to address concerns about water diversions from the Wapiti River, particularly during winter low-flow periods and the potential negative impacts to the aquatic environment. In response, a steering committee of local stakeholders including municipalities, Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation, industry, agriculture, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Mighty Peace Watershed Alliance (MPWA), supported by technical experts from Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP), was established. The steering committee initiated the development of a water management plan that includes a Water Conservation Objective (WCO) and management recommendations for the Wapiti River basin from the British Columbia border to its confluence with the Smoky River. A WCO is a limit to the volume of water that can be withdrawn from the Wapiti River, ensuring that water flow remains in the river system to meet ecological objectives. The Plan provides guidance and recommendations on balancing the needs of municipal water supply, industry uses, agriculture and other uses, while maintaining a healthy aquatic ecosystem in the Alberta portion of the Wapiti River basin. Wapiti River Water Management Plan | Summary 2 Purpose and Objectives of the Plan The Plan will be provided as a recommendation to AEP and if adopted, would form policy when making water allocation decisions under the Water Act, and where appropriate, under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act by establishing a WCO for the Wapiti River.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION 1: Pend Oreille COUNTY
    SECTION 1: Pend Oreille COUNTY DESCRIPTION OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY Just as the Rocky Mountains plunge into the United States on their majestic march from British Columbia, a western range called the Selkirk Mountains, runs in close parallel down into Idaho and Washington. This rugged spur offers exposed segments of the North American Continent and the Kootenay Arc, tectonic plates that began colliding over a billion years ago, and provides exceptional year-round settings for a variety of recreational opportunities. This lesser range is home to bighorn sheep, elk, moose, deer, bear, cougar, bobcats, mountain caribou, and several large predatory birds such as bald eagles and osprey. Not far from where these Selkirk Mountains end, Pend Oreille County begins its association with the Pend Oreille River. Pend Oreille County is a relatively small county that looks like the number “1” set in the northeast corner of the State of Washington. Pend Oreille County is 66 miles long and 22 miles wide. British Columbia is across the international border to the north. Spokane County and the regional trade center, the City of Spokane, lie to the south. Idaho’s Bonner and Boundary counties form the eastern border, and Stevens County, Washington forms the western border. (For a map of Pend Oreille County, see Appendix A) Encompassing more than 1400 square miles, most of Pend Oreille County takes the form of a long, forested river valley. This area, known as the Okanogan Highlands, is unique since it is the only area in the country where plant and animal species from both the Rocky Mountain Region and the Cascade Mountain region can be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Mobile Art from the Mid-Fraser and Thompson River Areas ARNOUDSTRYD
    CHAPTER9 Prehistoric Mobile Art from the Mid-Fraser and Thompson River Areas ARNOUDSTRYD he study of ethnographic and archaeological art the majority of archaeological work in the Plateau but from interior British Columbia has never received also appear to be the "heartland" of Plateau art develop­ Tthe attention which has been lavished on the art of ment as predicted by Duff (1956). Special attention will be the British Columbia coast. This was inevitable given the focused on the previously undescribed carvings recovered impressive nature of coastal art and the relative paucity in recent excavations by the author along the Fraser River of its counterpart. Nevertheless, some understanding of near the town of Lillooet. the scope and significance of this art has been attained, Reports and collections from seventy-one archaeologi­ largely due to the turn of the century work by members cal sites were checked for mobile art. They represent all of the Jesup North Pacific Expedition (Teit 1900, 1906, the prehistoric sites excavated and reported as of Spring 1909; Boas, 1900; Smith, 1899, 1900) and the more recent 1976, although some unintentional omissions may have studies by Duff (1956, 1975). Further, archaeological occurred. The historic components of continually oc­ excavations over the last fifteen years (e.g., Sanger 1968a, cupied sites were deleted and sites with assemblages of 1968b, 1970; Stryd 1972, 1973) have shown that prehistoric less than ten artifacts were also omitted. The most notable Plateau art was more extensive than previously thought, exclusions from this study are most of Smith's (1899) and that ethnographic carving represented a degeneration Lytton excavation data which are not quantified or listed from a late prehistoric developmental climax.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Bloom in the Central Strait of Georgia: Interactions of River Discharge, Winds and Grazing
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 138: 255-263, 1996 Published July 25 Mar Ecol Prog Ser I l Spring bloom in the central Strait of Georgia: interactions of river discharge, winds and grazing Kedong yinl,*,Paul J. Harrisonl, Robert H. Goldblattl, Richard J. Beamish2 'Department of Oceanography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 124 'pacific Biological Station, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada V9R 5K6 ABSTRACT: A 3 wk cruise was conducted to investigate how the dynamics of nutrients and plankton biomass and production are coupled with the Fraser River discharge and a wind event in the Strait of Georgia estuary (B.C.,Canada). The spring bloom was underway in late March and early Apnl, 1991. in the Strait of Georgia estuary. The magnitude of the bloom was greater near the river mouth, indicat- ing an earher onset of the spring bloom there. A week-long wind event (wind speed >4 m S-') occurred during April 3-10 The spring bloom was interrupted, with phytoplankton biomass and production being reduced and No3 in the surface mixing layer increasing at the end of the wind event. Five days after the lvind event (on April 15),NO3 concentrations were lower than they had been at the end of the wind event, Indicating a utilization of NO3 during April 10-14. However, the utilized NO3 did not show up in phytoplankton blomass and production, which were lower than they had been at the end (April 9) of the wind event. During the next 4 d, April 15-18, phytoplankton biomass and production gradu- ally increased, and No3 concentrations in the water column decreased slowly, indicating a slow re- covery of the spring bloom Zooplankton data indicated that grazing pressure had prevented rapid accumulation of phytoplankton biomass and rapid utilization of NO3 after the wind event and during these 4 d.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed
    BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY MINISTRY OF ENERGY, MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES LAKE KOOCANUSA HIGH LEVEL ASSESSMENT OF A PROPOSED DAM FINAL DRAFT PROJECT NO.: 0466001 DATE: November 19, 2020 BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 November 19, 2020 Project No.: 0466001 Kathy Eichenberger, Executive Director Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources PO Box 9314, Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9N1 Dear Kathy, Re: Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT BGC is pleased to provide the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources with the following FINAL DRAFT report. The report details an assessment of a proposed dam on Lake Koocanusa, in southeastern British Columbia. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 604-629-3850. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Hamish Weatherly, M.Sc., P.Geo. Principal Hydrologist Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Lake Koocanusa November 19, 2020 High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT Project No.: 0466001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Libby Dam is a 129 m high concrete gravity dam located on the Kootenay River near Libby, Montana. The dam was completed in 1973 and was first filled in 1974, inundating the Kootenay River valley to form the 145 km long Koocanusa Reservoir (Lake Koocanusa). Canadian residents and water users are affected by changes in the Libby Dam operations that affect reservoir water levels, as nearly half (70 km) of the reservoir extends into southeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review 1 he Columbia River Treaty History of the Treaty T between the United States and The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual fl ow, Canada has served as a model of generates more power than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British international cooperation since 1964, Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River Basin is actually bringing signifi cant fl ood control and located in Canada. Yet the Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, power generation benefi ts to both and up to 50 percent of the peak fl ood waters, that fl ow by The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River countries. Either Canada or the United between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, offi cials from the United States and States can terminate most of the Canada began a long process to seek a joint solution to the fl ooding caused by the unregulated Columbia provisions of the Treaty any time on or River and to the postwar demand for greater energy resources. That effort culminated in the Columbia River after Sept.16, 2024, with a minimum Treaty, an international agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development 10 years’ written advance notice. The of water resources regulation in the upper Columbia River U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Basin.
    [Show full text]