In the Supreme Court of Iowa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Literature, the Law of Obscenity, and the Constitution William B
University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1954 Literature, the Law of Obscenity, and the Constitution William B. Lockhart Robert C. McClure Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lockhart, William B. and McClure, Robert C., "Literature, the Law of Obscenity, and the Constitution" (1954). Minnesota Law Review. 2546. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2546 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW Journal of the State Bar Association Volume 38 March, 1954 No. 4 LITERATURE, THE LAW OF OBSCENITY, AND THE CONSTITUTION WILLIAm B. LOCKHART* AND ROBERT C. MCCLURE** Early in 1946 when Doubleday & Company, Inc., an old and very large and reputable publishing house,1 published Edmund Wilson's Memoirs of Hecate County, book reviewers and critics had a field day; for Edmund Wilson was then as now the nation's most distinguished literary critic, and this was his first book of fiction since I Was a Daisy, published in 1929.2 To Virgilia Peter- son in Commonweal the Memoirs was "a pathological joke," "a string of satiric stories which, in their aimlessly offensive vulgarity (aimless, unless the aim was in fact to offend) defy description." 3 Others went to the opposite extreme: Ralph Bates in the New York Times called it "a good, a distinguished book,"'4 and Time magazine said that "it was the first event of the year which can be described as 'literary,' " and that it was "pretty certainly the best contempor- ary chronicle, so far, of its place and period." 5 Most reviewers, *Professor of Law, University of Minnesota. -
Age and Sexual Consent
Per Se or Power? Age and Sexual Consent Joseph J. Fischel* ABSTRACT: Legal theorists, liberal philosophers, and feminist scholars have written extensively on questions surrounding consent and sexual consent, with particular attention paid to the sorts of conditions that validate or vitiate consent, and to whether or not consent is an adequate metric to determine ethical and legal conduct. So too, many have written on the historical construction of childhood, and how this concept has influenced contemporary legal culture and more broadly informed civil society and its social divisions. Far less has been written, however, on a potent point of contact between these two fields: age of consent laws governing sexual activity. Partially on account of this under-theorization, such statutes are often taken for granted as reflecting rather than creating distinctions between adults and youth, between consensual competency and incapacity, and between the time for innocence and the time for sex. In this Article, I argue for relatively modest reforms to contemporary age of consent statutes but propose a theoretic reconstruction of the principles that inform them. After briefly historicizing age of consent statutes in the United States (Part I), I assert that the concept of sexual autonomy ought to govern legal regulations concerning age, age difference, and sexual activity (Part II). A commitment to sexual autonomy portends a lowered age of sexual consent, decriminalization of sex between minors, heightened legal supervision focusing on age difference and relations of dependence, more robust standards of consent for sex between minors and between minors and adults, and greater attention to the ways concerns about age, age difference, and sex both reflect and displace more normatively apt questions around gender, gendered power and submission, and queer sexuality (Part III). -
Naturist Cuba: So Close, Or So Far Away
South Florida Free Beaches Florida Naturist Association Autumn 2006 Oct–Dec Vol. 6 – No. 4 www.sffb.com NATURIST CUBA: SO CLOSE, OR SO FAR AWAY... Ninety miles from Florida, and officially out-of-bounds for most U.S. citizens, Cuba gives a warm welcome to naturist tourists from Canada, Europe, and South America. story on page 4 2 The SunDial A Quarterly Journal of Florida Naturism Online version/advertiser information & rates: www.sffb.com/sundial.html Email: [email protected] Phone: 305-893-8838 Fax: 305-893-8823 Editor: Michael Kush SUN CLUB Printer: SFFB’s Naturist Social Group Thompson Press, Inc. (offset lithography) 16201 NW 54th Avenue, Miami, FL 33014 View currently planned open public events 305-625-8800 Sign up for Evite event announcements Publisher: of member-only events & parties www.sffb.com/sunclub [case sensitive] Phone inquiries: 954-961-2908 Get ready for The Naturist Society Florida Naturist Association, Inc. 2007 Naturist Gatherings & Festivals PO Box 530306, Miami Shores, FL 33153 Incorporated 1980 – Creators & mentors of Haulover Info at: www.naturistsociety.com Park’s clothing-optional naturist family beach— Dedicated to preserving and protecting free beaches The first event is the annual and naturist rights in Florida. Mid-Winter Naturist Festival Website: www.sffb.com at Sunsport Gardens Naturist Resort SFFB/FNA Officers, Directors & Beach Ambassadors: Loxahatchee (Palm Beach) Richard Mason, President & Treasurer pro temp Norma Mitchell, Vice-president President’s Day Weekend – February David Baum, Secretary [open office], Treasurer Info at: www.sunsportgarden.com SFFB/FNA Directors & Beach Ambassadors: Justin Hopkins – Paul Friderich, Jr. Join hundreds of naturists from across the USA Clyde Lott for an extended weekend of fellowship, sport, SFFB/FNA Beach Ambassadors: entertainment, and workshops on naturism, Annette Almanza – Marianna Biondi – Bruce Frendahl health, healing, spirituality, relationships Michael Kush – Norman “Doc” McClesky and a multitude of other topics. -
Dallas Striptease 1946-1960 A
FROM MIDWAY TO MAINSTAGE: DALLAS STRIPTEASE 1946-1960 A Thesis by KELLY CLAYTON Submitted to the Graduate School of Texas A&M University-Commerce in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2019 FROM MIDWAY TO MAINSTAGE: DALLAS STRIPTEASE 1946-1960 A Thesis by KELLY CLAYTON Approved by: Advisor: Jessica Brannon-Wranosky Committee: Sharon Kowalsky Andrew Baker Head of Department: Sharon Kowalsky Dean of the College: William Kuracina Dean of the Graduate School: Matthew A. Wood iii Copyright © 2019 Kelly Clayton iv ABSTRACT FROM MIDWAY TO MAINSTAGE: DALLAS STRIPTEASE 1946-1960 Kelly Clayton, MA Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2019 Advisor: Jessica Brannon-Wranosky PhD The entertainment landscape of post-World War II Dallas, Texas included striptease in different types of venues. Travelling and local striptease acts performed at the city’s annual fair and in several nightclubs in the city. In the late 1940s, the fair featured striptease as the headlining act, and one of the city’s newspapers, the Dallas Morning News, described the dancers as the most popular attraction of the largest fair in the United States. Further, the newspaper reporting congratulated the men who ran the fair for providing Texans with these popular entertainment options. The dancers who performed at the fair also showcased their talents at area nightclubs to mixed gender audiences. Dallas welcomed striptease as an acceptable form of entertainment. However, in the early 1950s, the tone and tenor of the striptease coverage changed. The State Fair of Texas executives decried striptease as “soiled” and low-class. Dancers performed in nightclubs, but the newspaper began to report on one particular entertainer, Candy Barr, and her many tangles with law enforcement. -
ESSAY: Eroticism, Obscenity, Pornography and Free Speech Nicholas Wolfson
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Brooklyn Law Review Volume 60 | Issue 3 Article 5 3-1-1994 ESSAY: Eroticism, Obscenity, Pornography and Free Speech Nicholas Wolfson Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Recommended Citation Nicholas Wolfson, ESSAY: Eroticism, Obscenity, Pornography and Free Speech, 60 Brook. L. Rev. 1037 (1994). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol60/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. ESSAY EROTICISM, OBSCENITY, PORNOGRAPHY AND FREE SPEECH Nicholas Wolfson* INTRODUCTION Modern society speaks about sex, Michel Foucault ob- serves, "ad infinitum, while exploiting it as the secret."' As he pointed out, we attempt to explain virtually everything about us in terms of sex. We 'bring [ourselves] almost entirely-our bodies, our minds our individuality, our history-under the sway of a logic of concupiscence and desire."2 Sexual depiction, in the forms modern society terms "por- nography" or "obscenity," is a multi-billion dollar industry.3 It is also the object of regulatory concern by the government and important movements in society.4 The debate about pornogra- phy begins with one fundamental question: what is it?5 The hotly disputed answers inevitably turn on sometimes violently contrasting notions of the good and evil life.6 Pornography is a running debate about issues deep in the human psyche, issues more fundamental than virtually all of the political topics that * Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law. -
2. What Type of Sex Offender Is Most Likely to Recommit Their Crimes? Incest Offenders, Rapists, Or Pedophiles?
UK Center for Research on Violence Against Women A key mission of the Center for Research on Violence Against Women is to ensure that the findings of quality research make it into the hands of advocates. This translation of research to practice ensures that science has an impact on the lives of women and children. In 2010 the Center for Research on Violence Against Women conducted a survey with over 100 rape crisis and domestic violence advocates in Kentucky about what they needed to know from research to help them do their jobs. Advocates identified ten top issues. A series of ten briefs were prepared by the Center to answer the Top Ten Things Advocates Need to Know. Top ten things advocates need to know 1. What services do survivors of rape find most helpful, and what help do they say they need? 2. What type of sex offender is most likely to recommit their crimes? Incest offenders, rapists, or pedophiles? 3. What mental health issues are caused by experiencing intimate partner violence or sexual assault? 4. Do protective orders work? Who violates protective orders the most? 5. What is the impact of mandatory arrest laws on intimate partner violence victims and offenders? 6. What are the most significant long-term health consequences of chronic sexual or physical violence? 7. What percentage of rape cases gets prosecuted? What are the rates of conviction? 8. Does treatment with intimate partner violence offenders work? 9. Does a report of intimate partner violence or sexual assault by a partner put a woman at risk of losing custody of her children? 10. -
Involuntariness, Obscenity, and the First Amendment
NOTE CRIMINALIZATION IN CONTEXT: INVOLUNTARINESS, OBSCENITY, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT Cynthia Barmore* “Revenge porn,” referring to the distribution of sexually explicit images without the consent of those featured, is a growing problem in the United States. New Jersey and California were the first states to criminalize the practice, but state legislatures around the country have been passing and considering similar laws in recent months. Proponents of legislation, however, are confronting critics who protest that the First Amendment precludes criminal liability for distributing lawfully acquired true material. This Note provides the first in-depth analysis of how obscenity law can and should be used to criminalize revenge porn within the boundaries of the First Amendment. While no state legislature has characterized revenge porn as ob- scenity, this Note argues they should because the obscenity context provides the greatest insulation from a First Amendment challenge. If drafted to prohibit ob- scenity, such laws would enable states to robustly and constitutionally criminalize revenge porn, even when the photographer is the person objecting to distribution or the distributor acts without intent to cause serious emotional distress. The hope is this Note will guide legislatures to draft constitutionally responsible legis- lation to combat revenge porn. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 448 I. CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES FOR REVENGE PORN.................................... -
Dsr-Newsletter-03-08-2021-Sfw.Pdf
March 8, 2021 Volume 21, Issue 8 Weekly Newsletter The new owners were received very well by the residents, members and guests that attended the meet and greet Saturday afternoon. Many great topics were briefly discussed transferring an amazingly certain future for the resort and anyone visiting. The owners are now chipping away at their ar- rangement of assault and with the incredible input they received during the Inside this issue occasion can now focus on the process pushing ahead. Be Yourself.................................. 3 They discussed a portion of the numerous amenities they intend to bring to Is there a human “need” ............ 3 the resort for everybody's delight. They spoke of some of the new activities Getting a Naturist Volunteer Job 4 they will be adding in the future. This will not be an overnight revitalization of Nude Beaches ............................ 4 the resort and we ask that you bear with us throughout the process. Obsessed with streaking ............. 5 Clean up of the resort has already begun. This is the initial step and will ac- Nudist Comedy DISROBED ......... 6 count for future changes. We are asking all site holders to begin the process poses at tourist spots ................. 6 of springtime site cleanup as well. Naturist Accommodations .......... 6 Please, stay tuned to our newsletter as this is the place where you will locate Chelsea Handler .......................... 8 the most data about the renewal of the resort. We are looking forward to the coming days, months, and years, as the new ideas are implemented. AANR Newsletter Attention Residents If you have not yet returned your questionnaire, please do so. -
Mexican Law on Obscenity D
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 6-1-1975 Mexican Law on Obscenity D. Rangel Medina Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Part of the Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation D. Rangel Medina, Mexican Law on Obscenity, 7 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 337 (1975) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol7/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter- American Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MEXICAN LAW ON OBSCENITY DAVID RANGEL MEDINA* STATUTORY ENACTMENTS Among individual guarantees, the political Constitution of the United States of Mexico recognizes the free expression of ideas and freedom of publication.1 However, this freedom is not without restrictions; it has some limitations. Thus, Art. 6 establishes that the expression of ideas shall not be subject to any judicial or administrative inquiry except in the event that it attacks morality,, infringes the rights of others, provokes a crime, or disturbs the public order. Art. 7 provides that freedom of expression or publication in connection with any subject is inviolable, adding that no law nor authority may establish preliminary censorship nor restrict freedom of publication. This freedom has limits, among others, respect for morality. The basic principles which limit freedom of expression and freedom of publication established by the Constitution are detailed and clarified in the Law of Publications (1917),2 regulatory of Art. -
Sexercising Our Opinion on Porn: a Virtual Discussion
Psychology & Sexuality ISSN: 1941-9899 (Print) 1941-9902 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpse20 Sexercising our opinion on porn: a virtual discussion Elly-Jean Nielsen & Mark Kiss To cite this article: Elly-Jean Nielsen & Mark Kiss (2015) Sexercising our opinion on porn: a virtual discussion, Psychology & Sexuality, 6:1, 118-139, DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2014.984518 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.984518 Published online: 22 Dec 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 130 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rpse20 Psychology & Sexuality, 2015 Vol.6,No.1,118–139, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.984518 Sexercising our opinion on porn: a virtual discussion Elly-Jean Nielsen* and Mark Kiss Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada (Received 1 May 2014; accepted 11 July 2014) A variety of pressing questions on the current topics and trends in gay male porno- graphy were sent out to the contributors of this special issue. The answers provided were then collated into a ‘virtual’ discussion. In a brief concluding section, the contributors’ answers are reflected upon holistically in the hopes of shedding light on the changing face of gay male pornography. Keywords: gay male pornography; gay male culture; bareback sex; pornography It is safe to say that gay male pornography has changed. Gone are the brick and mortar adult video stores with wall-to-wall shelves of pornographic DVDs and Blu-rays for rental and sale. -
Nudity Rider Basics
Nudity and Simulated Sex For actors new to the industry, actors Rider Basics without representation, background actors, and day players Nudity Riders A nudity rider, or simulated sex rider, is a contract between an actor and the production they are hired by that defines what will happen onset when filming nude, intimate, simulated sex, or simulated sexual assault scenes. It might also be called a nudity waiver, simulated sex act rider, simulated sex waiver, intimate scene rider, or proposed written consent. Any actor filming a nude, intimate, simulated sex, or simulated sexual assault scene, or appearing nude or simulating a sex act onset, even if not depicted in the film, shouldnegotiate terms for a nudity rider before filming begins. The casting professional who hires you will tell you if the role requires intimacy or nudity. The Basics Below are the basic terms that should be included in a nudity sex rider. Under SAG-AFTRA rules, producers are required to provide principal performers with proposed riders at least 48 hours in advance of call time. The SAG-AFTRA rules governing nudity riders differ for background actors. It falls on the casting agencies hiring background actors to obtain as much information as possible from the producer regarding nudity or simulated sex acts in the role and inform you prior to booking. If you are NOT notified of nudity or simulated sex in advance of your call time, you may refuse to engage in the performance and still get paid for the day. You (or your representative, if you have one) should discuss the terms with the person the production has designated to manage nudity riders. -
Sex Is Less Offensive Than Violence: a Call to Update Obscenity Jurisprudence Rachel Elizabeth Simon
Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2014 Sex Is Less Offensive Than Violence: A Call To Update Obscenity Jurisprudence Rachel Elizabeth Simon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Simon, Rachel Elizabeth, "Sex Is Less Offensive Than Violence: A Call To Update Obscenity Jurisprudence" (2014). Law School Student Scholarship. 575. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/575 SEX IS LESS OFFENSIVE THAN VIOLENCE: A CALL TO UPDATE OBSCENITY JURISPRUDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. The State of Obscenity ........................................................................................................... 2 A. The “Inherent Morality” Standard ................................................................................................. 2 B. Sex and Violence Under the “Inherent Morality” Standard ......................................................... 5 1. Regulation of Sexual Expression .................................................................................................... 6 2. Why Offensiveness vis-à-vis Sex Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague ............................................. 11 3. Regulation of Violent Expression ................................................................................................. 13 4. Why Violent Expression