DOCSLIB.ORG

MSCI Index Calculation Methodology Index Calculation Methodology for the MSCI Equity Indices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSCI Index Calculation Methodology Index Calculation Methodology for the MSCI Equity Indices Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology Index Calculation Methodology for the MSCI Equity Indices August 2012 msci.com Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology August 2012 Contents Contents ..................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................... 5 MSCI Equity Indices .................................................................... 6 Section 1: MSCI Price Index Methodology ................................ 7 1.1. Price Index Level ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1. Index Market Capitalization ...................................................................... 7 1.1.2. Example of calculation ............................................................................ 10 1.2. Price Index Level (Alternative Calculation Formula – Contribution Method) .................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1. Security Contribution to the Index ......................................................... 11 1.2.2. Today’s Initial Security Weight ................................................................ 11 1.2.3. Security Daily Price Return ....................................................................... 13 1.2.4. Example of calculation using contribution ............................................ 15 1.3. Next Day Initial Security Weight ................................................................ 16 1.4. Closing Index Market Capitalization Today USD (Unadjusted Market Cap Today USD) ....................................................................................................... 17 1.5. Security Index Of Price In Local ................................................................... 18 1.6. Note on Index Calculation In Local Currency ............................................ 19 1.7. Conversion of Indices Into Another Currency ............................................ 20 2. Section 2: MSCI Daily Total Return (DTR) Index Methodology ............................................................................ 22 2.1. Calculation Methodology ........................................................................... 22 2.1.1. Dividend Impact ......................................................................................... 23 2.1.2. DTR Index Level from Security Information (Security DTR)................. 23 2.1.3. Security Contribution to the Index ......................................................... 23 2.1.4. Security Daily Total Return....................................................................... 24 2.1.4.1. Security Daily Gross Return ................................................................... 24 2.1.4.2. Security Daily Net Return ....................................................................... 25 2.1.5. Initial Security Weight ............................................................................. 27 MSCI Data Operations & Technology msci.com © 2012 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document 2 Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology August 2012 2.1.6. Currency ..................................................................................................... 29 2.1.7. Number Of Shares And Index Weighting Factor ................................. 29 2.2. Reinvestment Methodology ....................................................................... 29 2.2.1. Timing of reinvestment ........................................................................... 30 2.2.2. Reinvestment Rules.................................................................................. 30 2.2.3. Dividends Resulting in a Reinvestment Only ....................................... 30 2.2.4. Dividends Resulting in a Reinvestment or in a Price Adjustment ..... 31 2.2.5. Dividends Resulting in a Price Adjustment Only .................................. 32 2.3. Processing Rules ........................................................................................... 33 2.3.1. Dividend Data ........................................................................................... 33 2.3.2. Corporate Actions ..................................................................................... 33 2.3.3. Corrections ................................................................................................. 33 2.3.4. Payment Default ....................................................................................... 34 2.3.5. Late Dividends ........................................................................................... 34 2.3.6. Country Exceptions ................................................................................... 34 2.3.7. Taxes On Dividends .................................................................................. 36 2.3.7.1. Tax Credit ................................................................................................ 36 2.3.7.2. Withholding Tax ...................................................................................... 36 2.3.7.2.1. Country Exception ............................................................................... 37 2.3.8. Definitions .................................................................................................. 38 Appendix I: Saturday / Sunday Index Calculation ................... 40 Appendix II: Annualized Traded Value Ratio (ATVR) and Annual Traded Value ............................................................... 43 Appendix III: Exchange Rates ................................................... 46 Appendix IV: Singapore & Malaysia – A History of Inclusion in the Emerging and Developed Markets Indices ...................... 47 Appendix V: Singapore and Singapore Free ........................... 50 Appendix VI: Withholding Tax Rates ....................................... 51 Appendix VII: Closing Prices Policy .......................................... 54 Appendix VIII: Country Composition of MSCI Selected Regional Indices ....................................................................... 65 Appendix IX: MSCI Real Time Indices ...................................... 75 MSCI Data Operations & Technology msci.com © 2012 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document 3 Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology August 2012 Appendix X: Index Calculation Methodology Using Index Divisors ..................................................................................... 77 MSCI Index Calculation Methodology Book Tracked Changes91 Client Service Information is Available 24 Hours a Day ....................................... 99 Notice and Disclaimer .............................................................................................. 99 About MSCI ............................................................................................................. 100 MSCI Data Operations & Technology msci.com © 2012 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document 4 Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology August 2012 Introduction This methodology book describes MSCI’s general Index calculation methodology for the MSCI Equity Indices. MSCI provides two ways of calculating MSCI Equity Indices, either by using the Price Adjustment Factor (PAF) or the Index Divisors (Index Divisors methodology available as an appendix). These policies and guidelines affect all securities across the MSCI Equity Indices and products. Unless otherwise stated the policies and guidelines apply therefore to all securities in the MSCI Equity universe. Please note that the index construction methodology and other guiding principles for the MSCI Standard Indices can be found in MSCI Global Investable Market Indices Methodology Indices document, available at www.msci.com. MSCI Data Operations & Technology msci.com © 2012 MSCI Inc. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of this document 5 Index Methodology MSCI Index Calculation Methodology August 2012 MSCI Equity Indices The MSCI Equity Indices measure the performance of a set of equity securities over time. The MSCI Equity Indices are calculated using the Laspeyres’ concept of a weighted arithmetic average together with the concept of chain-linking. MSCI country and regional equity Indices are calculated in “local currency” as well as in USD, with price, gross and net returns. Index levels are also available in several other currencies such as AUD, BRL, CAD, CHF, CNY, EUR, GBP, HKD, INR, JPY, KRW, RUB and SGD. While the local currency series of regional indices cannot be replicated in the real world, it represents the theoretical performance of an index without any impact from foreign exchange fluctuations — a continuously hedged portfolio. Indices are calculated 5 days a week, from Monday to Friday with the exception of a selection of indices that have Saturday and Sunday calculations available. In certain cases, where there are no qualifying securities, it is possible for MSCI Indices to be empty following a security deletion or GICS change. If an index becomes empty it would be dynamically discontinued or ‘ruptured’. It is then possible for the index to be re-started once a new security qualifies for the index, and this index level would be rebased to an appropriate level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weak-Form Market Efficiency, Estimation Interval and the Nigerian Stock Exchange: Empirical Evidence
    WEAK-FORM MARKET EFFICIENCY, ESTIMATION INTERVAL AND THE NIGERIAN STOCK EXCHANGE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE Onyemachi Maxwell Ogbulu, Abia State University Abstract Given the desirability of efficient capital markets in aiding optimal resource mobilization and allocation in the financial system, this paper is an attempt to investigate the efficiency level of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) across different data estimation intervals with reference to the weak-form variant of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The paper employed daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly aggregate stock price data using the NSE All Share Index series from 4th January, 1999 to 31st December, 2013 to test for the weak-form efficiency of the NSE using a combination of seven (7) statistical and parametric tools namely- Autocorrelation tests, the ADF and P-P unit root tests, Variance Ratio tests, the Normality/Random Walk tests, the Granger Causality test, the ARCH-GARCH test and Regression rest. The empirical results of the investigation indicate that on balance the NSE is weak-form inefficient when daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly prices are examined irrespective of the estimation interval and the parametric test employed in the tests. It is to be noted from the findings that the NSE is still weak-form inefficient despite the implementation of various capital market reforms undertaken in the recent past as well as the adoption of automation and ICT in the operations of the Exchange. It is therefore recommended that these salutary reforms and policies should be intensified and sustained to ensure efficiency of the NSE. Keywords: Weak-form efficiency, Efficient Market Hypothesis, Estimation Interval, Parametric Tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Business in Ukraine Brochure
    Conducting Business 2017 in Ukraine All of the information included in this document is for informational purposes only, and may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments, or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything, and in respect of the consequences of anything, done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s Conducting Business in Ukraine brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this document without first seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. Conducting Business in Ukraine 2017 Baker McKenzie Renaissance Business Center 24 Bulvarno-Kudriavska St. Kyiv 01601, Ukraine Tel.: +380 44 590 0101 Fax: +380 44 590 0110 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com\ukraine Conducting Business in Ukraine Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................... i 1. Ukraine – An Overview .......................................................... 1 1.1 Geography, Topography and Population .................... 1 1.2 Government, Political and Legal Systems .................. 1 1.3 Regional Structure ...................................................... 6 1.4 Economy ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Modern Tendencies in the Ukrainian
    Baltic Journal of Economic Studies Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015 EVALUATION OF THE MODERN TENDENCIES IN THE UKRAINIAN STOCK MARKET DEVELOPMENT Oleksandr TROFIMCHUK1, Mykhailo TROFIMCHUK2, International Economics and Humanities University named after S. Demyanchuk, Ukraine Abstract. The purpose of the article is to research and critically evaluate the features of functioning and develop- ment the stock market in Ukraine. The main point is to substantiate modern tendencies and to find ways of more efficient development of the Ukrainian stock market. Methodology. The research is based on the analysis of the important aspects which characterize stock market development. They are the volume of trading activity that was done on stock exchanges, level of market capitalization, economic concentration, price policy on market services, and control over the insider information use and manipulation identification. Results. On the basis of volume of trading activity that was done on stock exchanges, features of stock market structure are determined. Comparative analysis between the stock market capitalization level of Ukraine and average world index of stock market capi- talization is done. The level and dynamic of economic concentration is defined. Features of competition between Ukrainian stock exchanges are analyzed. Great attention in research is paid to problems of control over the insider information use and principles of manipulation identification by stock exchanges. Value/originality. The research showed that main amount of trading operations was done in “shadow” stock market, capitalization level decreased and stock market in Ukraine does not meet international standards of transparency. Further research should be focused on problems of ensuring the effective implementation of the basic principles of competition between market participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – September/October 2017 Volume 33, Number 5 The Effect Of Corporate Governance On Unfaithful Disclosure Designation And Unfaithful Disclosure Penalty Points Bo Young Moon, Dankook University, South Korea Soo Yeon Park, Korea University, South Korea ABSTRACT This paper investigates the relation between Unfaithful Disclosure Corporations (“UDC”) and corporate governance using listed firm (KOSPI and KOSDAQ) data in Korea. Prior literature reports that corporate governance has an impact on the level of disclosure and the quality of disclosure provided by companies. However, it is hard to find the studies about corporate governance and UDC at the term of disclosure quality. Compare to some financially advanced countries, Korea established corporate governance in a relatively short period of time; hence concerns have been raised the corporate governance have not played effective role to monitor management. We question how corporate governance affects companies’ unfaithful disclosure by using several corporate governance proxy variables and UDC data which is unique system in Korea. From the empirical tests, we find a negative association between the proportion of outside directors, an indicator of the board’s independence, and UDC designation, among companies listed on both KOSPI and KOSDAQ. On the other hand, there is a significant positive association between the proportion of outside directors and UDCs’ imposed and accumulated penalty points among KOSDAQ-listed companies. This implies that outside director system effectively play a monitoring role however due to different natures of members included in outside directors, the system often fails to control regarding based reasons for penalty points imposition. In addition, we find the percentage of foreign equity ownership showed statistically significant positive association with UDC designation and a significant positive association with the imposed and accumulated penalty points among KOSPI-listed companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Market React Differently to Chaebol Firms?
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – September/October 2014 Volume 30, Number 5 Does The Market React Differently To Chaebol Firms? Heejin Park, Hanyang University, South Korea Jinsoo Kim, Hanyang University, South Korea Mihye Ha, Hanyang University, South Korea Sambock Park, Hanyang University, South Korea ABSTRACT Based on a sample of Korean firms listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ from 2001 to 2011, we examined whether the affiliation of a firm with a Chaebol group affects the sensitivity of stock prices to earnings surprises. We found that the market response to positive (negative) earnings surprises is more positive (negative) for Chaebol firms than for non-Chaebol firms. In addition, we investigated how intra-group transactions affect the ERCs of Chaebol firms by comparing with those of non-Chaebol firms. Our results show that the intra-group transactions of Chaebol firms are positively related to ERCs under both positive and negative earnings surprises. However, we did not find the same results from the analyses of non-Chaebol firms. Keywords: Chaebol Firms; Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC); Earnings Surprises; KOSPI; KOSDAQ 1. INTRODUCTION he aim of this study is to examine how differently the market reacts to earnings surprises of Chaebol firms compared to those of non-Chaebol firms. Although there is no official definition of Chaebol, T firms are perceived as Chaebol if they consist of a large group and operate in many different industries, maintain substantial business ties with other firms in their group, and are controlled by the largest shareholder as a whole. The definition used to identify Chaebol firms is that of a large business group established by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) and a group of companies of which more than 30% of the shares are owned by the group’s controlling shareholders and its affiliated companies.
    [Show full text]
  • On Determination of Market Price of One Ordinary Registered Share of the Moscow Exchange (State Registration Number 1-05-8443-H Dated 16.11.2011)
    2, 3-ya ulitsa Yamskogo Polya, bld. 7, office 301, Moscow, 125040 Tel.: +7 (495) 717-01-01 +7 (495) 557-07-97 www.evcons.ru REPORT No. 134/16 dated June 29, 2016 On determination of market price of one ordinary registered share of the Moscow Exchange (state registration number 1-05-8443-H dated 16.11.2011) Customer: Moscow Exchange Contractor: Everest Consulting Moscow 2016 EVEREST Consulting LLC 1 Att: Evgeny Fetisov CFO Moscow Exchange Dear Evgeny, Under Agreement No.134/16 dated 16.06.2016 executed by and between Everest Consulting Limited Liability Company (hereinafter Everest Consulting LLC, the Contractor), and Public Joint-Stock Company Moscow Exchange MICEX-RTS (hereinafter the Moscow Exchange, the Customer), the appraiser employed by the Contractor (hereinafter the Appraiser) carried out valuation of one registered ordinary share of the Moscow Exchange (hereinafter the Object of Valuation). The principle task and intended use of valuation was to measure the market price of the Object of Valuation for the purpose of share buyback from shareholders who voted against the corporate restructuring or failed to participate in voting in pursuance with clause 1 and clause 3 Article 75 of the Federal Law No.208-FZ On Joint-stock Companies dated 26 December 1995. The valuation was done in accordance with the Federal Law No.135-FZ On Valuation Activity in the Russian Federation dated 29 July 1998, Federal Evaluation Standard General Concepts of the Valuation, Approaches and Requirements to Carrying Out the Valuation (FES No.1) approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy No.
    [Show full text]
  • Markit Index Standard Treatment Index Manual / 7 May 2021
    Markit Index Standard Treatment Index Manual / 7 May 2021 Copyright © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd T180614 Markit Index Standard Treatment | CA003 1 Introduction..................................................................................................4 2 Terminology and Notation........................................................................... 5 3 Divisor Methodology....................................................................................8 4 Dividend Points Calculation........................................................................ 9 5 Indices Conversion to Different Currencies.............................................. 10 6 Corporate Actions Treatment Specifications............................................. 11 6.1 General rules of corporate actions treatment....................................11 6.1.1 Price Return, Net Return and Gross Return index adjustments................................................................................... 11 6.1.2 Corporate actions implementation date.................................... 11 6.2 Cash Dividends ................................................................................ 11 6.2.1 Regular Cash Dividend.............................................................11 6.2.1.1 Definition .......................................................................... 11 6.2.1.2 Treatment ......................................................................... 12 6.2.2 Special Cash Dividend..............................................................13 6.2.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Msci Index Calculation Methodology
    INDEX METHODOLOGY MSCI INDEX CALCULATION METHODOLOGY Index Calculation Methodology for the MSCI Equity Indexes Esquivel, Carlos July 2018 JULY 2018 MSCI INDEX CALCULATION METHODOLOGY | JULY 2018 CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 MSCI Equity Indexes........................................................................... 5 1 MSCI Price Index Methodology ................................................... 6 1.1 Price Index Level ....................................................................................... 6 1.2 Price Index Level (Alternative Calculation Formula – Contribution Method) ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Next Day Initial Security Weight ............................................................ 15 1.4 Closing Index Market Capitalization Today USD (Unadjusted Market Cap Today USD) ........................................................................................................ 16 1.5 Security Index Of Price In Local .............................................................. 17 1.6 Note on Index Calculation In Local Currency ......................................... 19 1.7 Conversion of Indexes Into Another Currency ....................................... 19 2 MSCI Daily Total Return (DTR) Index Methodology ................... 21 2.1 Calculation Methodology ....................................................................... 21 2.2 Reinvestment
    [Show full text]
  • For Additional Information
    April 2015 Attached please find the updated Foreign Listed Stock Index Futures and Options Approvals Chart, current as of April 2015. All prior versions are superseded and should be discarded. Please note the following developments since we last distributed the Approvals Chart: (1) The CFTC has approved the following contracts for trading by U.S. Persons: (i) Singapore Exchange Derivatives Trading Limited’s futures contract based on the MSCI Malaysia Index; (ii) Osaka Exchange’s futures contract based on the JPX-Nikkei Index 400; (iii) ICE Futures Europe’s futures contract based on the MSCI World Index; (iv) Eurex’s futures contracts based on the Euro STOXX 50 Variance Index, MSCI Frontier Index and TA-25 Index; (v) Mexican Derivatives Exchange’s mini futures contract based on the IPC Index; (vi) Australian Securities Exchange’s futures contract based on the S&P/ASX VIX Index; and (vii) Moscow Exchange’s futures contract based on the MICEX Index. (2) The SEC has not approved any new foreign equity index options since we last distributed the Approvals Chart. However, the London Stock Exchange has claimed relief under the LIFFE A&M and Class Relief SEC No-Action Letter (Jul. 1, 2013) to offer Eligible Options to Eligible U.S. Institutions. See note 16. For Additional Information The information on the attached Approvals Chart is subject to change at any time. If you have questions or would like confirmation of the status of a specific contract, please contact: James D. Van De Graaff +1.312.902.5227 [email protected] Kenneth M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Alp Eroglu International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Calle Oquendo 12 28006 Madrid Spain
    1301 Second Avenue tel 206-505-7877 www.russell.com Seattle, WA 98101 fax 206-505-3495 toll-free 800-426-7969 Mr. Alp Eroglu International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Calle Oquendo 12 28006 Madrid Spain RE: IOSCO FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS CONSULTATION REPORT Dear Mr. Eroglu: Frank Russell Company (d/b/a “Russell Investments” or “Russell”) fully supports IOSCO’s principles and goals outlined in the Financial Benchmarks Consultation Report (the “Report”), although Russell respectfully suggests several alternative approaches in its response below that Russell believes will better achieve those goals, strengthen markets and protect investors without unduly burdening index providers. Russell is continuously raising the industry standard for index construction and methodology. The Report’s goals accord with Russell’s bedrock principles: • Index providers’ design standards must be objective and sound; • Indices must provide a faithful and unbiased barometer of the market they represent; • Index methodologies should be transparent and readily available free of charge; • Index providers’ operations should be governed by an appropriate governance structure; and • Index providers’ internal controls should promote efficient and sound index operations. These are all principles deeply ingrained in Russell’s heritage, practiced daily and they guide Russell as the premier provider of indices and multi-asset solutions. Russell is a leader in constructing and maintaining securities indices and is the publisher of the Russell Indexes. Russell operates through subsidiaries worldwide and is a subsidiary of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. The Russell Indexes are constructed to provide a comprehensive and unbiased barometer of the market segment they represent. All of the Russell Indexes are reconstituted periodically, but not less frequently than annually or more frequently than monthly, to ensure new and growing equities and fixed income securities are reflected in its indices.
    [Show full text]
  • International Projects
    Monthly Issue 7/2012 July 2012 YOUR GUIDE TO THE RUSSIAN STOCK AND DERIVATIVES MARKET International Projects In this Issue: MICEX–RTS announced the launch of trading in futures Valuable information for your business including: on BRICS Indices • The latest news from the With the launch of futures on (Johannesburg Stock Exchange) Russian market BRICS benchmark equity indices from South Africa. on June 6, 2012, all Russian The first stage of the BRICS • Market data for June 2012 investors, for the first time, got exchanges’ cooperation is cross- • MICEX–RTS International an opportunity for easy exposure listing of benchmark equity index projects to these fast-growing markets. derivatives on all the participating • Professional opinion of market This became possible thanks trading venues. As a result, all specialists to the joint efforts of the BRICS MICEX–RTS clients have been exchanges alliance that was provided access to the following formed on 12 October 2011. financial instruments: This is a unique project that opens The initiative brings together • futures contract up new opportunities for economic the BM&FBOVESPA from Brazil, on the BOVESPA Index; cooperation in the BRICS region. MICEX–RTS Exchange from • futures contract The initiative provides more investors Russia, the BSE Ltd (formerly on the Sensex Index; with an easy access to the dynamic known as Bombay Stock • futures contract BRICS economies which will facilitate Exchange) from India, Hong Kong on the Hang Seng Index; liquidity growth in these markets Exchanges and Clearing Limited • futures contract on the and considerably strengthen the (HKEx), and the JSE Limited FTSE/JSE Top40 Index international position of the BRICS alliance in the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Market Highlights
    2020 Market Highlights Summary 2020 was an extraordinary year for everyone, perhaps rather too eventful. The Covid-19 pandemic, the US presidential election, Brexit, the resignation of Japan’s prime minister Shinzo Abe and increased tension between the US and China created vast economic uncertainty and a flood of pessimistic forecasts. In March we saw market volatility levels comparable only to those of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 and for months on end, normal working, travel, and leisure arrangements were severely disrupted. When we look at the data, the magnitude of the shock is evident, particularly in March. But what is remarkable is that despite the exceptional circumstances and even during the worst days of the crisis, markets remained open and functioning. In addition, after the peak in uncertainty observed in March, markets quickly recovered. By the end of July, most indicators registered a quick reversal to the activity levels seen before the pandemic, reflecting a strong confidence in the markets and in their role in supporting the economy. Towards the end of the year, the news of the development and approval of several Covid-19 vaccines, the final agreement between the UK and the EU, and the outcome of the US elections seemed to have boosted the confidence of investors and issuers, driving markets to end the year on a high note. Key Indicators Equities • After a sharp drop (20.7%) in Q1, domestic market capitalisation quickly recovered, reaching pre-pandemic levels by the end of Q2. • In November 2020, global market capitalisation passed the 100 USD trillion mark for the first time, ending the year at 109.21 USD trillion, up 19.7% when compared with the end of 2019.
    [Show full text]