bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.216283; this version posted July 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bacterial dormancy: a subpopulation of viable but non-culturable cells demonstrates better fitness for revival. Sariqa Wagley1*, Helen Morcrette1, Andrea Kovacs-Simon1, Zheng R. Yang1, Ann Power2, Richard K. Tennant2, John Love2, Neil Murray3, Richard W. Titball1 and Clive S. Butler1* 1 Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, UK 2 BioEconomy Centre, The Henry Wellcome Building for BioCatalysis, Biosciences, Stocker Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, UK 3 Lyons Seafoods, Fairfield House, Fairfield Road, Warminster, Wiltshire, BA12 9DA. *Corresponding authors:
[email protected];
[email protected] Key words: Viable but non culturable cells, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, FACS, IFC, Proteomics Running title: characterisation of subpopulations of VBNC cells bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.216283; this version posted July 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract: The viable but non culturable (VBNC) state is a condition in which bacterial cells are viable and metabolically active, but resistant to cultivation using a routine growth medium.