DOCSLIB.ORG

Tunisia: Freedom of Expression Under Siege

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tunisia: Freedom of Expression under Siege Report of the IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group on the conditions for participation in the World Summit on the Information Society, to be held in Tunis, November 2005 February 2005 Tunisia: Freedom of Expression under Siege CONTENTS: Executive Summary p. 3 A. Background and Context p. 6 B. Facts on the Ground 1. Prisoners of opinion p. 17 2. Internet blocking p. 21 3. Censorship of books p. 25 4. Independent organisations p. 30 5. Activists and dissidents p. 37 6. Broadcast pluralism p. 41 7. Press content p. 43 8. Torture p. 46 C. Conclusions and Recommendations p. 49 Annex 1 – Open Letter to Kofi Annan p. 52 Annex 2 – List of blocked websites p. 54 Annex 3 – List of banned books p. 56 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX) is a global network of 64 national, regional and international freedom of expression organisations. This report is based on a fact-finding mission to Tunisia undertaken from 14 to 19 January 2005 by members of the IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group (IFEX-TMG) together with additional background research and Internet testing. The mission was composed of the Egyptian Organization of Human Rights, International PEN Writers in Prison Committee, International Publishers Association, Norwegian PEN, World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) and World Press Freedom Committee. Other members of IFEX-TMG are: ARTICLE 19, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE), the Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Studies (CEHURDES), Index on Censorship, Journalistes en Danger (JED), Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), and World Association of Newspapers (WAN). The principle findings of the mission were: Imprisonment of individuals related to expression of their opinions or media activities. Blocking of websites, including news and information websites, and police surveillance of e-mails and Internet cafes. Blocking of the distribution of books and publications. Restrictions on the freedom of association, including the right of organizations to be legally established and to hold meetings. Restrictions on the freedom of movement of human rights defenders and political dissidents together with police surveillance, harassment, intimidation and interception of communications. Lack of pluralism in broadcast ownership, with only one private radio and one private TV broadcaster, both believed to be loyal supporters of President Ben Ali. Press censorship and lack of diversity of content in newspapers. Use of torture by the security services with impunity. The IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group (TMG) believes that Tunisia must greatly improve its implementation of internationally agreed freedom of expression 3 and other human rights standards if it is to hold the World Summit on the Information Society in Tunis in November 2005. In particular we urge the Tunisian authorities to: 1. Release Hamadi Jebali, editor of the weekly Al Fajr and hundreds of prisoners like him held for their religious and political beliefs and who never advocated or used violence. 2. End arbitrary administrative sanctions compelling journalist Abdellah Zouari to live nearly 500 km away from his wife and children and guarantee his basic right to freedom of movement and expression. 3. Release the seven cyber dissidents known as the Youth of Zarzis who, following unfair trials, have been sentences to heavy prison terms allegedly for using the Internet to commit terror attacks. During the trials, no evidence of wrongdoing was offered, according to their lawyers and local and international human rights groups. 4. End harassment and assaults on human rights and political activists and their relatives and bring to justice those responsible for ordering these attacks and perpetrating them. 5. Stop blocking websites and putting Internet cafes and Internet users under police surveillance. 6. Release banned books, end censorship, and conform to international standards for freedom of expression. 7. Take action against interference by government employees in the privacy of human rights and political activists and end the withholding of their mail and email. 8. Lift the arbitrary travel ban on human rights defenders and political activists, including Mokhtar Yahyaoui and Mohammed Nouri. 9. Take serious steps toward lifting all restrictions on independent journalism and encouraging diversity of content and ownership of the press. 10. Promote genuine pluralism in broadcast content and ownership including fair and transparent procedures for the award of radio and TV broadcast licences. 11. Allow independent investigation into cases of torture allegedly perpetrated by security forces. 12. Conform to international standards on freedom of association and freedom of assembly and grant legal recognition to independent civil 4 society groups such as the CNLT, the Tunis Center for the Independence of the Judiciary, the League of Free Writers, OLPEC, the International Association to Support Political Prisoners, the Association for the Struggle against Torture, and RAID-ATTAC- Tunisia. 5 A. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Background to the mission This report is based on a fact-finding mission to Tunisia undertaken from 14 to 19 January 2005 by members of the International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX) together with additional background research and Internet testing. IFEX is an umbrella organization of 64 national, regional, and international groups committed to protecting freedom of expression worldwide. The mission was composed of the Egyptian Organization of Human Rights, International PEN Writers in Prison Committee, International Publishers Association, Norwegian PEN, World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) and World Press Freedom Committee. The organizations are part of a group of IFEX members which came together in 2004 to form the Tunisian Monitoring Group (IFEX-TMG). The other members of IFEX-TMG are ARTICLE 19, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) which manages the Toronto-based IFEX, the Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Studies (CEHURDES), Index on Censorship, Journalistes en Danger (JED), the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), and the World Association of Newspapers (WAN). The goal of the IFEX-TMG is to campaign for significant improvements in conditions for freedom of expression in Tunisia as the country prepares itself to host the second phase of the World Summit of the Information Society (WSIS) to be held in Tunis, in November 2005. Members of IFEX have taken a close interest in the World Summit on the Information Society since its inception. At their annual meeting, held in Baku, Azerbaijan in June 2004, 31 members of IFEX signed an open letter to United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan expressing serious concerns for the second Summit in Tunis and setting out a series of freedom of expression benchmarks (Annex 1). These concerns were reinforced by experiences at the Tunis Summit Preparatory Committee meeting held in Hammamet, Tunisia in June 2004 when Tunisian government officials and Tunisian government sponsored “NGOs” sought to suppress any discussion of human rights in Tunisia. In consequence a number of IFEX members involved in the WSIS process took the decision to establish the IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group to observe and report on freedom of expression in Tunisia in the run up to and the period following the Tunis Summit of the WSIS. This report, the first of the IFEX-TMG, assesses the current state of freedom of expression in Tunisia and makes a series of recommendations for improvement. Unprecedented since Tunisia‟s independence from France in 1956, the IFEX- TMG mission of multiple groups advocating freedom of expression came nearly five years after the fact-finding mission to Tunisia conducted by the UN 6 Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. Abid Hussain. In February 2000, the UN Special Rapporteur characterised the Tunisian media as showing “uniformity of tone” and lack of criticism of government policies. Not only has this situation not improved, but the legislation traditionally used to exert “different kinds of inducements and pressure” on journalists and editors has been amended in the past two years to drastically further restrict freedom of expression. Tunisians of different political trends, including former ministers, acknowledged that the WSIS could offer invaluable opportunities to inform the international community of the unrelenting attacks on freedom of expression and to campaign for the protection of this basic right before and after the Tunis Summit of the WSIS. However, many expressed the fear that the Tunisian government, which heavily invests in public relations campaigns and in establishing groups it falsely calls NGOs, would use the WSIS to improve its image while continuing to conceal its poor human rights record. Official figures place the number of civil society groups at more than eight thousands, but reliable sources maintain that there are less than a dozen truly independent groups. Most of them are not recognized by the authorities and their leading figures are under continuous police surveillance and harassment. During the six-day mission, members of the IFEX-TMG met with Tunisian writers, publishers, editors, journalists, rights defenders, and academics, as well as government officials and government sponsored organisations. Throughout the mission members of the delegation were observed by and witnessed in action
Recommended publications
  • Same Old Rights Violations in Tunisia

    Same Old Rights Violations in Tunisia

    BEHIND THE FAÇADE: HOW A POLITICISED JUDICIARY & ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS UNDERMINE TUNISIAN HUMAN RIGHTS Report from the Seventh IFEX-TMG Mission to Tunisia (6 June 2010) Behind the Façade: How a Politicised Judiciary & Administrative Sanctions Undermine Tunisian Human Rights About the IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group (IFEX-TMG) The International Freedom of Expression Exchange Tunisia Monitoring Group (IFEX-TMG) is a coalition of 20 organisations set up in 2004 to monitor freedom of expression in Tunisia in the run up to and following the WSIS, held in Tunis in November 2005. The 20 organisations are all members of IFEX, a global network of around 90 national, regional and international organisations committed to defending the right to freedom of expression. The seventh mission of the IFEX-TMG to Tunisia took place in the context of a 30-month project Monitoring & Advocacy in Support of Independent Human Rights Defenders in Tunisia, funded by European donors and managed by Index on Censorship, which started in January 2010. It was comprised of Amadou Kanoute of ARTICLE 19, Yousef Ahmed of Index on Censorship, Anthony Mills of the International Press Institute (IPI), Carl Morten Iversen of Norwegian PEN, and Tamsin Mitchell of the Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN (WiPC). Barbora Bukovsa of ARTICLE 19 was not granted a visa on time by the Embassy in London (as has happened for previous members of IFEX-TMG missions requiring a visa. None of the other mission participants required a visa.) The first IFEX-TMG mission took place in January 2005 and led to the first report Tunisia: Freedom of Expression Under Siege, published in February 2005.
  • Ennahda's Approach to Tunisia's Constitution

    Ennahda's Approach to Tunisia's Constitution

    BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER ANALYSIS PAPER Number 10, February 2014 CONVINCE, COERCE, OR COMPROMISE? ENNAHDA’S APPROACH TO TUNISIA’S CONSTITUTION MONICA L. MARKS B ROOKINGS The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high- quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s) and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its scholars. Copyright © 2014 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha TABLE OF C ONN T E T S I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 III. Diverging Assessments .................................................................................................4 IV. Ennahda as an “Army?” ..............................................................................................8 V. Ennahda’s Introspection .................................................................................................11 VI. Challenges of Transition ................................................................................................13
  • Policy Notes for the Trump Notes Administration the Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ 2018 ■ Pn55

    Policy Notes for the Trump Notes Administration the Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ 2018 ■ Pn55

    TRANSITION 2017 POLICYPOLICY NOTES FOR THE TRUMP NOTES ADMINISTRATION THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ 2018 ■ PN55 TUNISIAN FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA AARON Y. ZELIN Tunisia should really open its embassy in Raqqa, not Damascus. That’s where its people are. —ABU KHALED, AN ISLAMIC STATE SPY1 THE PAST FEW YEARS have seen rising interest in foreign fighting as a general phenomenon and in fighters joining jihadist groups in particular. Tunisians figure disproportionately among the foreign jihadist cohort, yet their ubiquity is somewhat confounding. Why Tunisians? This study aims to bring clarity to this question by examining Tunisia’s foreign fighter networks mobilized to Syria and Iraq since 2011, when insurgencies shook those two countries amid the broader Arab Spring uprisings. ©2018 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ NO. 30 ■ JANUARY 2017 AARON Y. ZELIN Along with seeking to determine what motivated Evolution of Tunisian Participation these individuals, it endeavors to reconcile estimated in the Iraq Jihad numbers of Tunisians who actually traveled, who were killed in theater, and who returned home. The find- Although the involvement of Tunisians in foreign jihad ings are based on a wide range of sources in multiple campaigns predates the 2003 Iraq war, that conflict languages as well as data sets created by the author inspired a new generation of recruits whose effects since 2011. Another way of framing the discussion will lasted into the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. center on Tunisians who participated in the jihad fol- These individuals fought in groups such as Abu Musab lowing the 2003 U.S.
  • [Tunisia, 2013-2015] Tunisia

    [Tunisia, 2013-2015] Tunisia

    Case Study Series Women in Peace & Transition Processes: [Tunisia, 2013-2015] December 2019 Name of process Tunisia Constituent Assembly (2013-2015) and National Dialogue Type of process Constitution-making The role of women in resolving Tunisia’s post-“Arab Spring” political crisis, which and political reform peaked in 2013, was limited, but not insignificant. Institutionalized influence Modality of women's was very limited: there was no formal inclusion of women’s groups in the main inclusion: negotiations of the 2013/2014 National Dialogue and the influence of organized • Consultations advocacy was also limited in the pre-negotiation and implementation phases. • Inclusive commission For example, the women’s caucus formed in the Tunisian National Constituent • Mass mobilization Assembly (Tunisia’s Parliament from the end of 2011 to 2014, hereafter NCA) Women’s influence could not prevail over party politics and was not institutionalized. However, in the process: individual women played decisive roles in all three phases: one of the four main Moderate influence due to: civil society mediators, who not only facilitated the main negotiations, but also • + The progressive legislation in initiated the dialogue process and held consultations to determine the agenda Tunisia on women's rights and in the pre-negotiation phase, was a woman, (Ouided Bouchamaoui President political participation of the Tunisian Union of Industry, Commerce and Crafts (UTICA), from 2011 • + The influential role and status to 2018). A small number of women represented political parties in the of individual women negotiations of the National Dialogue. And women were active in consultations • - The lack of organized and group-specific women's and commissions concerning the National Dialogue, before, in parallel or after involvement the main negotiation period, for example in the consensus committee of the • - The involvement of relatively National Constituent Assembly.
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 9 March 2012 English

    General Assembly Distr.: General 9 March 2012 English

    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/13/TUN/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 March 2012 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirteenth session Geneva, 21 May–4 June 2012 Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21 Tunisia* The present report is a summary of 17 stakeholders’ submissions1 to the universal periodic review. It follows the general guidelines adopted by the Human Rights Council in its decision 17/119. It does not contain any opinions, views or suggestions on the part of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), nor any judgement or determination in relation to specific claims. The information included herein has been systematically referenced in endnotes and, to the extent possible, the original texts have not been altered. As provided for in Resolution 16/21 of the Human Rights Council, where appropriate, a separate section is provided for contributions by the national human rights institution of the State under review that is accredited in full compliance with the Paris Principles. The full texts of all submissions received are available on the OHCHR website. The report has been prepared taking into consideration the periodicity of the review and developments during that period. * The present document was not edited before being sent to United Nations translation services. GE.12-11791 (E) 150312 210312 A/HRC/WG.6/13/TUN/3 I. Information provided by the accredited national human rights institution of the State under review in full compliance with the Paris Principles N/A II.
  • International Bureau for Children's Rights (IBCR)

    International Bureau for Children's Rights (IBCR)

    Making Children’s Rights Work in North Africa: Country Profiles on Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco Country Profiles on Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia and Tunisia Making Children’s Rights Work in North Africa:Making Children’s Rights Work Making Children’s Rights Work in North Africa: Country Profiles on Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia The first version of this report was posted on IBCR’s website in March 2007. This second version has been reedited in August 2007. International Bureau for Children’s Rights (IBCR) Created in 1994 and based in Montreal, Canada, the International Bureau for Children’s Rights (IBCR) is an international non- governmental organisation (INGO) with special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). IBCR offers its expertise, particularly in the legal sector, to contribute to the protection and promotion of children’s rights in conformity with the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and its Optional Protocols. The expertise of IBCR resides in the sharing of knowledge and good practices and in the development of tools and models to inspire implementation of children’s rights. IBCR’s expertise also lies in raising awareness about children’s rights to persuade decision-makers to adopt laws and programmes that more effectively respect the rights of the child. In recent years, IBCR’s main successes include its exceptional contribution to the elaboration of the Guidelines on Justice in Matters Involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime as well as their adoption by the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC Res.
  • Quelques Aspects Problematiques Dans La Transcription Des Toponymes Tunisiens

    Quelques Aspects Problematiques Dans La Transcription Des Toponymes Tunisiens

    QUELQUES ASPECTS PROBLEMATIQUES DANS LA TRANSCRIPTION DES TOPONYMES TUNISIENS Mohsen DHIEB Professeur de géographie (cartographie) Laboratoire SYFACTE FLSH de Sfax TUNISIE [email protected] Introduction Quelle que soit le pays ou la langue d’usage, la transcription toponymique des noms de lieux géographiques sur un atlas ou un autre document cartographique en particulier ou tout autre document d’une façon générale pose problème notamment dans des pays où il n’y a pas de tradition ou de « politique » toponymique. Il en est de même pour les contrées « ouvertes » à l’extérieur et par conséquent ayant subi ou subissant encore les influences linguistiques étrangères ou alors dans des régions caractérisées par la complexité de leur situation linguistique. C’est particulièrement le cas de la Tunisie, pays méditerranéen bien « ancré » dans l’histoire, mais aussi bien ouvert à l’étranger et subissant les soubresauts de la mondialisation, et manquant par ailleurs cruellement de politique toponymique. Tout ceci malgré l’intérêt que certains acteurs aux profils différents y prêtent depuis peu, intérêt matérialisé, entre autres manifestations scientifiques, par l’organisation de deux rencontres scientifiques par la Commission du GENUING en 2005 et d’une autre août 2008 à Tunis, lors du 35ème Congrès de l’UGI. Aussi, il s’agit dans le cadre de cette présentation générale de la situation de la transcription toponymique en Tunisie, dans un premier temps, de dresser l’état des lieux, de mettre en valeur les principales difficultés rencontrées en manipulant les noms géographiques dans leurs différentes transcriptions dans un second temps. En troisième lieu, il s’agit de proposer à l’officialisation, une liste-type de toponymes (exonymes et endonymes) que l’on est en droit d’avoir par exemple sur une carte générale de Tunisie à moyenne échelle.
  • A Guide to Defending Writers Under Attack

    A Guide to Defending Writers Under Attack

    A guide to defending writers under attack The Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN ‘I have personally known writers who have chosen to raise forbidden topics purely because they were forbidden. I think I am no different. Because when another writer in another house is not free, no writer is free. This, indeed, is the spirit that informs the solidarity felt by International PEN, by writers all over the world’ Orhan Pamuk A guide to defending writers under attack: The Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN Contents Introduction 3 Part One: What is International PEN? 6 International PEN Charter 7 Part Two: An introduction to the Writers in Prison Committee 8 How does the Writers in Prison Committee work? 9 Part Three: Joining the Writers in Prison Committee 12 Part Four: Who does the Writers in Prison Committee work for? 14 Case List 15 Part Five: The Writers in Prison Committee Activities & Resources 17 Honorary Members 17 Rapid Action Network 23 Writing Offi cial Appeals 27 Biennial Conferences 32 Campaign and Focus Actions 32 The Day of the Imprisoned Writer & other international days 34 Meetings with Ambassadors and Governments 36 Embassy Visits 37 Visits to your foreign ministry 37 Trial observations and other missions 38 Working with other NGOs 38 Approaching Intergovernmental organisations 38 Working with Writers in Exile 39 PEN Emergency Fund 39 Awards 40 Part Six: Media and Publicity: raising public awareness and infl uencing opinion 40 Part Seven: The Writers in Prison Committee and International PEN 44 Part Eight: Resources and Glossary 47 2 A guide to defending writers under attack: The Writers in Prison Committee of International PEN September 2010 Dear colleagues in International PEN, It is a great pleasure to be able to present to you, at the 76th Congress of International PEN in Tokyo, printed copies of the Writers in Prison Committee’s handbook, A guide to defending writers under attack.
  • Enhancing the Rule of Law and Guaranteeing Human Rights in the Constitution

    Enhancing the Rule of Law and Guaranteeing Human Rights in the Constitution

    Enhancing the Rule of Law and guaranteeing human rights in the Constitution A report on the constitutional reform process in Tunisia Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952 and active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realization of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession. Cover photo © Copyright Remi OCHLIK/IP3 © Copyright International Commission of Jurists The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) permits free reproduction of extracts from any of its publications provided that due acknowledgment is given and a copy of the publication carrying the extract is sent to its headquarters at the following address: International Commission Of Jurists P.O. Box 91 Rue des Bains 33 Geneva Switzerland Enhancing the Rule of Law and guaranteeing human rights in the Constitution TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... 2 CHRONOLOGY................................................................................................ 8 GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................
  • Tunisian Human Rights League Report on the Freedom Of

    Tunisian Human Rights League Report on the Freedom Of

    Tunisian Human Rights League The Press: A Disaster Victim Report on the Freedom of Information in Tunisia May 2003 PREAMBLE On the occasion of the international day of the press freedom, the Tunisian League for the Human Rights Defence puts at the hand of the public opinion this report about information and press freedom in Tunisia after it issued in 1999 under the title of “Press freedom in Tunisia” a complete study relevant to the press reality in Tunisia. The League insisted in its report, articles and activities on its interest in the press reality In Tunisia because this area knew a serious decline during the last years, which let the Tunisian citizens abandon it and appeal to the foreign press, since the Union is aware that the press is the reflective mirror of any progress that the country is likely to record and since It also realized that the freedom of expression is the way to issue general freedoms. This report focused on clinging to the recorded events and happenings that the last century had known and which show by themselves the decline that this field has known through hamper and pressure on journalists as well as the excessive similitude made between all mass media, which led to a national agreement about requiring the improvement of this field. This report is not limited to the various harms which affected the journalists and newspapers resulting from the authority control, but this report concerns every citizen who tries to put his rights of expression into practice mainly through the internet, but who also faced arrest and trial.
  • Words of Welcome by Pierre Schori, Chairperson of the Olof Palme

    Words of Welcome by Pierre Schori, Chairperson of the Olof Palme

    Words of welcome by Pierre Schori, chairperson of the Olof Palme Memorial Fund, at the Award ceremony of the 2012 Olof Palme Prize in Stockholm, Sweden, 25 January 2013 A very warm welcome, Radhia Nasraoui and Samar Badawi to this august hall, where members of the Second Chamber of the Swedish Parliament used to meet. We thank the Social Democratic Parliamentary group for hosting us here today. A special welcome to the members of the Palme family. Welcome also to members of the Swedish government and Parliament, of the United Nations branches, the diplomatic Corps and the Ministry for foreign affairs, to former prime minister Ingvar Carlsson and his succesor as leader of the Social democratic party, Stefan Löfven, to the spokesperson of Miljöpartiet, Gustaf Fridolin,and other members of political parties, trade unions, the cooperative movement, of the the National Swedish Police Board, the Folke Bernadotte Academy, welcome to representatives of international and national non- governmental organisations and the European parliament, media, publishers and the business sector, think tanks, universities, youth, students' and women's organizations, of arts and culture, theater and film, representatives of the organization Jews for Peace between Israel and Palestine, of the Red Cross and its Center for treatment of tortured people, Save the Children, Greenpeace, the Salvation army, Amnesty, the Civil Rights Defenders and Foundation for Human Rights and all other citizens here present committed to human rights and the legacy of Olof Palme. Dear Radhia and Samar, all of us have come here this afternoon to honour you and our absent friend, who most regrettably was not allowed to leave his country, your husband, Samar, Waleed Sami Abu al-Khair.
  • Tunisia Digital Rights & Inclusion 2020 Report.Cdr

    Tunisia Digital Rights & Inclusion 2020 Report.Cdr

    LONDA TUNISIA DIGITAL RIGHTS AND INCLUSION A PARADIGM INITIATIVE PUBLICATION REPORT LONDA TUNISIA DIGITAL RIGHTS AND INCLUSION REPORT A PARADIGM INITIATIVE PUBLICATION Published by Paradigm Initiative Borno Way, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria Email: [email protected] www.paradigmhq.org Published in April Report written by Yosr Jouini Editorial Team: ‘Gbenga Sesan, Kathleen Ndongmo, Koliwe Majama, Margaret Nyambura Ndung’u, Mawaki Chango, Nnenna Paul-Ugochukwu and Thobekile Matimbe. Design & Layout by Luce Concepts This publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use in any form provided due credit is given to the publishers, and the work is presented without any distortion. Copyright © Paradigm Initiative Creative Commons Attribution . International (CC BY .) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LONDA INTERNET ACCESS TUNISIA DIGITAL RIGHTS AND INCLUSION REPORT A PARADIGM INITIATIVE PUBLICATION IMPACT OF COVID- REGULATIONS ON DIGITAL RIGHTS AND INCLUSION PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ONLINE FREEDOM OF SPEECH Civil society organizations continue to work to advance digital rights and inclusion in Africa, ensuring best practices are adopted into policy and legislation. This report analyses the state of digital rights and inclusion in Tunisia, examining MISINFORMATION LAWS violations and gaps, investigating the use and application of policy and legislation, highlighting milestones and proffering recommendations for the digital landscape in CONCLUSION AND Tunisia. This edition captures among other issues, the RECOMMENDATIONS digital divide worsened by the COVID- pandemic and unearths infractions on different thematic areas such as privacy, access to information, and freedom of expression with the legislative and policy background well enunciated. @ParadigmHQ TUNISIA DIGITAL RIGHTS AND INCLUSION 2020 REPORT Tunisia is a North African country with a population of .