Case 6 the Air Express Industry: 40 Years of Expansion Charles W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case 6 the Air Express Industry: 40 Years of Expansion Charles W Case 6 The Air Express Industry: 40 Years of Expansion Charles W. L. Hill, The University of Washington via air. During the first half of the 1990s, the small pack- INTRODUCTION age express industry continued to grow at a healthy The small package express delivery industry is that seg- rate, with shipments expanding by slightly more than 2 ment of the broader postal and cargo industries that spe- 16% per annum. Despite this growth, the industry was cializes in rapid (normally 1–3 days) delivery of small hit by repeated rounds of price cutting as the three big packages (small packages are defined as those weighing private firms battled to capture major accounts. In addi- less than 150 lbs or having less than 165 inches in com- tion to price cutting, the big three also competed vigor- bined length and girth). The modern express delivery ously on the basis of technology, service offerings, and industry in the United States began with Fred Smith’s the global reach of their operations. By the late 1990s vision for Federal Express Company, which started and early 2000s the intensity of price competition in operations in 1973. Federal Express transformed the the industry had moderated, with a degree of pricing structure of the existing air cargo industry and paved discipline being maintained, despite the fact that the the way for rapid growth in the overnight package seg- growth rate for the industry slowed down. Between 1995 ment of that industry. A further impetus to the indus- and 2000, the industry grew at 9.8% per year. In 2001 try’s development was the 1977 deregulation of the U.S. the volume of express parcels shipped by air fell by air cargo industry. This deregulation allowed Federal 5.9%, partly due to an economic slowdown, and Express (and its emerging competitors) to buy large jets partly due to the aftereffects of the September 11 3 for the first time. The story of the industry during the terrorist attack on the United States. Growth picked up 1980s was one of rapid growth and new entry. Between again in 2002. Estimates suggest that the global market 1982 and 1989, small package express cargo shipments by for small package express delivery should continue to air in the United States grew at an annual average rate of grow by a little over 6% per annum between 2005 and 31%. In contrast, shipments of air freight and air mail 2025. Most of that growth, however, is forecasted to take grew at an annual rate of only 2.7%.1 This rapid growth place outside of the now mature North American mar- attracted new entrants such as United Parcel Service ket. Within the United States, the annual growth rate is 4 (UPS) and Airborne Freight (which operated under the predicted to match the growth in United States GDP. name Airborne Express). The entry of UPS triggered se- In North America, the biggest change to take place vere price cutting, which ultimately drove some of the in the 2000s was the 2003 entry of DHL with the ac- weaker competitors out of the market and touched off a quisition of Airborne Express for $1 billion. DHL is it- wave of consolidation in the industry. self owned by Deutsche Post World Net, formally the By the mid 1990s, the industry structure had stabi- German post office, which since privatization has been lized with four organizations —Federal Express, UPS, rapidly transforming itself into a global express mail Airborne Express, and the United States Postal Service — and logistics operation. Prior to 2003, DHL lacked a accounting for the vast majority U.S. express shipments strong presence in the all-important United States mar- ket. The acquisition of Airborne gave DHL a foothold in Copyright © Charles W.L. Hill. All rights reserved. the United States. DHL subsequently spent $1.5 billion C-92 84487_case-6_ptg01_hr_C092-C104.indd 92 22/10/13 4:39 PM Case 6 The Air Express Industry: 40 Years of Expansion C-93 trying to upgrade Airborne’s delivery network in a quest the airlines. They purchased cargo space from the airlines for market share. Despite heavy investments, DHL failed and retailed this space in small amounts. They dealt pri- to gain traction and after 5 years of losses, in 2009 it marily with small customers, providing pickup and deliv- exited the United States market. With the exit of DHL, ery services in most cities, either in their own trucks or the United States market looks increasingly like a duo- through contract agents. The U.S. Postal Service used air poly. In 2012, FedEx held onto 53% of the $15 billion service for transportation of long-distance letter mail and Overnight Express market, UPS accounted for 42% and air parcel post.7 the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) held 5% (although the USPS actually contracted out its express deliveries to FedEx). UPS dominated the $34 billion ground market for small packages in 2012, with a 60% share, followed THE FEDERAL EXPRESS by FedEx with 24% and the USPS with 16%.5 CONCEPT Founded by Fred Smith, Jr., Federal Express was incor- porated in 1971 and began operations in 1973. At that THE INDUSTRY BEFORE time, a significant proportion of small-package air freight FEDEX flew on commercial passenger flights. Smith believed that there were major differences between packages and In 1973, roughly 1.5 billion tons of freight were shipped passengers, and he was convinced that the two had to in the United States. Most of this freight was carried by be treated differently. Most passengers moved between surface transport, with air freight accounting for less major cities and wanted the convenience of daytime than 2% of the total.6 While shipment by air freight was flights. Cargo shippers preferred nighttime service to often quicker than shipment by surface freight, the high coincide with late-afternoon pickups and next-day delivery. cost of air freight had kept down demand. The typical Because small-package air freight was subservient to users of air freight at this time were suppliers of time- the requirements of passengers’ flight schedules, it was sensitive, high-priced goods, such as computer parts and often difficult for the major airlines to achieve next-day medical instruments, which were needed at dispersed lo- delivery of air freight. cations but which were too expensive for their customers Smith’s aim was to build a system that could achieve to hold as inventory. next-day delivery of small-package air freight (less The main cargo carriers in 1973 were major than 70 pounds). He set up Federal Express with his passenger airlines, which operated several all-cargo $8 million family inheritance and $90 million in venture planes and carried additional cargo in the holds of capital (the company’s name was changed to FedEx in their passenger planes, along with a handful of all- 1998). Federal Express established a hub-and-spoke route cargo airlines such as Flying Tiger. From 1973 onward, system, the first airline to do so. The hub of the system was the passenger airlines moved steadily away from all- Memphis, chosen for its good weather conditions, central cargo planes and began to concentrate cargo freight in location, and the fact that it was Smith’s hometown. The passenger planes. This change was a response to spokes were regular routes between Memphis and ship- increases in fuel costs, which made the operation of ping facilities at public airports in the cities serviced by many older cargo jets uneconomical. Federal Express. Every weeknight, aircraft would leave With regard to distribution of cargo to and from their home cities with a load of packages and fly down the airports, in 1973 about 20% of all air freight was delivered spokes to Memphis (often with one or two stops on to airports by the shipper and/or picked up by the con- the way). At Memphis, all packages were unloaded, sorted signee. The bulk of the remaining 80% was accounted for by destination, and reloaded. The aircraft then returned by three major intermediaries: (1) Air Cargo Incorporated, back to their home cities in the early hours of the morn- (2) freight forwarders, and (3) the U.S. Postal Service. Air ing. Packages were ferried to and from airports by Federal Cargo Incorporated was a trucking service, wholly owned Express couriers driving the company’s vans and working by 26 airlines, which performed pickup and delivery ser- to a tight schedule. Thus, from door to door, the package vice for the airlines’ direct customers. Freight forwarders was in Federal Express’s hands. This system guaranteed were trucking carriers who consolidated cargo going to that a package picked up from a customer in New York 84487_case-6_ptg01_hr_C092-C104.indd 93 22/10/13 4:39 PM C-94 Case 6 The Air Express Industry: 40 Years of Expansion at 5 p.m. would reach its final destination in Los Angeles been held artificially low by regulation. As a result, the (or any other major city) by noon the following day. It average yield (revenue per ton mile) on domestic air- enabled Federal Express to realize economies in sorting freight increased 10.6% in 1978 and 11.3% in 1979.9 and to utilize its air cargo capacity efficiently. Federal Freed from the constraints of regulation, Federal Ex- Express also pioneered the use of standard packaging with press immediately began to purchase larger jets and quickly an upper weight limit of 70 pounds and a maximum established itself as a major carrier of small-package air length plus girth of 108 inches.
Recommended publications
  • CNF Inc. Is a $4.8 Billion Company That Provides Supply
    CNF’sCompany Description CNF Inc. is a $4.8 billion company that provides supply chain management and transportation services for commercial and industrial customers throughout North America and the world. The company has two principal business units: Con-Way Transportation Services and Menlo Worldwide. Con-Way offers full-service less-than-truckload (LTL) regional next-day and second-day trucking, expedited transportation, logistics, air freight forwarding and truckload brokerage services. The companies of Menlo Worldwide provide global air and ocean freight forwarding, customs brokerage, expedited transportation and logistics services, including third- and fourth-party logistics, as well as supply chain technology, engineering and consulting. Additional information about CNF and its companies can be found at www.cnf.com. For CNF, 2002 was a year in which your company faced and overcame many challenges. Although results were not record setting, CNF’s performance was commendable in a struggling global economy. Our employees at CNF, Con-Way Transportation We ended the year with a very good balance Services and Menlo Worldwide showed the depth of sheet including $270 million in cash. The strong their dedication and experience in rising to the many cash position was achieved despite the fact that we tasks presented last year. paid more than $300 million to aircraft lessors for the early return of many aircraft and other restruc- At the end of 2001, we restructured Emery turing charges following the closure of the airline. Worldwide, joining it with Menlo Logistics and Vector SCM, our joint venture with General Motors, Strategically, we made a great deal of progress in under the new Menlo WorldwideSM brand.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • One Year Price Performance Investment Thesis Catalysts Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec JBLU S&P 500 Jetblue
    Hailey Davis, Gino Jo, Beto Ramos, Bridget Parsells Equity Research | February 18, 2016 | NYSE: JBLU NYSE: JBLU Current Price: $21 Intrinsic Value: $29 Target Price: $35 Implied Return: 33% Recommendation Company Profile JetBlue Airways Corporation is a U.S. based low-cost passenger airline. The company operates primarily on point-to-point routes with its fleet of 13 Airbus A321, 130 Airbus A320, and 60 Embraer E190 aircrafts. JetBlue’s recent price BUY pullback, attractive growth prospects, and strong financial position provide an deep undervaluation of over 30%. Key Statistics One Year Price Performance Sector: Services JBLU S&P 500 60% Industry: Regional Airlines 45% Market cap: $6.69B 52 week high: $27.26 30% 52 week low: $16.26 15% Trailing P/E: 10.72 Forward P/E: 8.01 P/S: 1.01 0% EV/EBITDA: 4.71 Beta: 1.01 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ROA: 7% ROE: 21.3% Catalysts Investment Thesis - Superior business model - Continued growth in demand driven by brand recognition with - Greater financial stability the “JetBlue experience” - Loyalty program - Competitive cost structure - Sustained low oil prices - High value geography - Cabin restyling program - Pullback fueled by recession fears creates buying opportunity Recommendation: BUY Investment Thesis Breakdown Brand Recognition with the “JetBlue Experience” The “JetBlue Experience” is a distinctive flying experience that J.D. Power 2015 Airline Satisfaction continues to attract new customers. JetBlue is the carrier of choice for travelers who have been underserved by other airlines as it offers a JetBlue Airlines 801 superior flying experience coupled with excellent customer service.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Appendix 1 Codes Prep Codes, Data Element 751
    VOLVO Applications of ASC 12 Version: 9705-4 Published 2005-02-10 1. Appendix 1 Codes Prep Codes, Data element 751 00 According to Drawing 01 No Surface Treatment 02 Primer, Undercoats or Corr. Finish 03 Rustproof, parts ‘Y700/3’ 04 Top Coat 05 Zinc-plating 06 Hot Zinc Coat 09 Prep According to separate notes 14 Top Coat, Black 15 Top Coat, Black, High Gloss Packaging Codes, Data element 754 A Vendor packs in VTNA multiple package quantity B Vendor packages individually in suitable container C Vendor packs multiple components into individual kits D VTNA packs in selling multiple (corr container) E VTNA packs in selling multiple (merchandising carton) F VTNA packs individually (corr container) G VTNA packs individually (merchandise carton) H VTNA packs individually (wood crate) K VTNA packs multiple components into kits L VTNA packages individually (polybag) M VTNA packs in selling multiple (polybag) N Vendor: quantity ordered is for sets not pieces P VTNA special packaging instructions S Please cut and supply in .... foot lengths T Vendor cut and supply in .... meter lengths Z Package to VTNA work instruction 930.350 issue 02 VV Description gives an extended code, the Volvo company involved will gives a separate instruction about the codes. Appendix 1 Codes 1:1 VOLVO Applications of ASC 12 Version: 9705-4 Published 2005-02-10 Ship/Delivery or Calendar Pattern Codes, Data element 678 Code Description A Monday through Friday B Monday through Saturday C Monday through Sunday D Monday E Tuesday F Wednesday G Thursday H Friday J Saturday K Sunday L Monday through Thursday M Immediately N As Directed O Daily Mon.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrado Elected Chief Operating Officer of Atsg
    Employee Portal Corporate Store ATSG CORRADO ELECTED CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF ATSG WILMINGTON, OH – September 11, 2017 – Air Transport Services Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATSG) today announced that its Board of Directors has elected Richard F. Corrado as chief operating officer of the cargo aircraft leasing and services company. Corrado, 57, has served since 2010 as chief commercial officer of ATSG, and president of its Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (CAM) and Airborne Global Solutions, Inc. (AGS) subsidiaries. As COO, he assumes responsibility for the operating units of ATSG, including its cargo airlines and aircraft maintenance businesses. He will continue to report to ATSG President & CEO Joe Hete in his new role, effective today, while maintaining his AGS responsibilities on an interim basis. Hete credited Corrado with leading the way in presenting ATSG’s unmatched capabilities in midsize freighter leasing and operating services as unique solutions for rapidly growing regional express networks around the world. That includes the Amazon Prime Air network that ATSG pioneered in 2015 and supports today with twenty leased Boeing 767 freighters, crews, and maintenance and logistics services. “During his more than seven years with ATSG, our externally leased portfolio of Boeing 767 freighters has more than tripled to forty-seven today, including the 767s we now lease to, and operate for, Amazon and DHL in the U.S.,” Hete said. “I am confident Rich will be just as effective in the future running our extensive collection of airline, maintenance and service businesses as I focus more on strategic opportunities and overall performance.” Randy Rademacher, board chairman of ATSG, said Corrado’s broad industry experience and success in building CAM into one of the world’s largest freighter aircraft lessors have contributed to substantial rewards for ATSG shareholders and increased opportunities for its employees.
    [Show full text]
  • ORD Cargo Ops by Hour 01.15.16.Xlsx
    Nighttime Cargo Carriers Summary Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: December 13, 2015 22:00 to December 19, 2015 07:00 Time of Day: 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. Airline Airline Code Operations Aerologic BOX 2 AeroUnion TNO 2 Air China Cargo CAO 10 Air Choice One WBR 4 AirBridge Cargo Airlines ABW 10 Cargolux Airlines CLX 13 Centurion Air Cargo CWC 1 China Cargo Airlines CKK 4 DHL/Airborne Express ABX 8 FedEx FDX 54 Kalitta Air CKS 1 Lufthansa Cargo GEC 7 Martinair MPH 2 Nippon Cargo Airlines NCA 11 Polar Air Cargo PAC 4 Sky Lease Cargo KYE 6 TNT Airways TAY 7 UPS UPS 39 Total 185 Chicago Department of Aviation Printed January 2016 Nighttime Cargo Carriers Operation Report Chicago O'Hare International Airport Period: December 13, 2015 22:00 to December 19, 2015 07:00 Time of Day: 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. Day of the Week Saturday 12/12 Sunday 12/13 Monday 12/14 Tuesday 12/15 Wednesday 12/16 Thursday 12/17 Friday 12/18 to Sunday 12/13 to Monday 12/14 to Tuesday 12/15 to Wednesday 12/16 to Thursday 12/17 to Friday 12/18 to Saturday 12/19 Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops Airline Aircraft Ops CAO B77L 1 CAO B77L 1 FDX A306 1 CAO B77L 1 ABW B748 1 FDX A306 1 ABW B74N 1 A300 1 FDX A30B 1 FDX A306 1 B77L 1 B752 1 UPS GEC MD11 1 A300 2 GEC MD11 1 MD11 1 FDX DC10 1 22:00 UPS B752 1 NCA B748 1 NCA B748 1 MD11 1 A300 2 A300 1 GEC B77L 1 UPS UPS B763 1 B763 1 NCA B748 1 CKK B744 1 CLX B748 1 B752 1 ABX B762 1 ABW B74N 1 ABW B744 1 ABX B762 1 NCA B748 1 FDX DC10 2 B752
    [Show full text]
  • Former ABX/DHL Employees Rebounded
    Former ABX/DHL employees rebounded at UPS … paying bills, For some it happened paying for a place to live quickly, for others it in Missouri, and the kids in college,” took a while He said that period “drained our savings”; we The News Journal had to go to bank to see recently reached out if we could pay half of our publicly and asked former house payment, but we DHL/ABX employees only had to do that one to share their experi- time.” ences before, during and For a year-and-a-half he after DHL shut its doors commuted every week locally. to Missouri — a 10-hour These are their stories: drive. He joined the UPS Darrin Tissandier, Louisville, management training Ky. program, and since 2010 Darrin Tissandier he’s been a maintenance graduated in 1986 from supervisor in Louisville. Blanchester High School. He continues to com- After serving in the U.S. mute from Hillsboro to Air Force for four years Louisville (2.5 hours one (where he met his wife), way). While in Louisville they lived in Brown he’s one of 7 residents of County. a “crash house” with men Darrin started working from St. Louis, Indianap- at the Airborne Express Courtesy photo | Darrin Tissandier olis, Ohio and Michigan. sort center in Wilmington This group photo, which includes Darrin Tissandier, shows workers at Airborne Express in Wilmington in 1993. Tissandier is standing, just Some of those work at in 1992, and by 1994 to the right of the middle, hat on and hands crossed. Southwest Airlines — in he was a junior aircraft Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Tank Owners for Leaking Sites
    2021 MDEQ – UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK BRANCH DIVISION OF LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) SITES INTRODUCTION: Staff assigned to oversee releases from UST systems are listed below: UST Technical I Supervisor Charka Fair (601) 961-5602 Project Manager Brittany Jamison (601) 961-5063 Project Manager Inez Williams (601) 961-5654 UST Technical II Supervisor Dan Harper (601) 961-5354 Project Manager John Traweek (601) 961-5603 Project Manager Madeline Wildman (601) 961-5186 GARD Env. Admin. Coordinator Heather Pitts (601) 961-5079 RELEASE REPORT: New releases should be reported to Dan Harper. Once the release has been entered into the database, the leaking site will then be transferred to a project manager. DIVISION OF SITES: The attached table lists past and present tank owners of leaking UST sites and their assigned project manager. In general, one tank owner is assigned to the same project manager for multiple leaking sites, but may be assigned to more than one project manager if necessary. If there is no project manager listed, either the tank owner has no active leaking sites, or a project manager has not been assigned. 2021 MDEQ – UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK BRANCH DIVISION OF TANK OWNERS FOR LEAKING UST SITES TANK PROJECT TANK PROJECT OWNER MANAGER OWNER MANAGER 100 Travel Center Alva N Temple 14th Flying Training Wing Amerada Hess Corporation 2003 Realty Company American Freightways Corporation 27-55 Fuel Plaza LLC Wildman American Helmitin Corporation 4 County Electric Power Association Ameristar Casino Vicksburg Inc 4 Kings Food Mart Amit Benerjee A & A Express Lane 3 LLC Williams Amite County Cooperative AAL A A Humber Amite County Schools A B Hogue Ammar Sharaf Jamison A L Phillips Andre and Vickie Curry Pitts A L Smith Oil Company Andy Burt A Sinclair May Anguilla Farm Service A T & T Communications Inc Anju Walia Harper A T Perumal Pillai Ann Smith Grocery A V Littrell Lumber Mill, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information Accounting and Reporting Directiv
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE No. 327 Issue Date: 1/10/2018 Effective Date: Immediately Part: 241 Section: 25 T-8 Traffic Data The Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ (BTS) Office of Airline Information (OAI) requires all-cargo carriers that hold a 418 Certificate to report annually, Schedule T-8 data as outlined in 14 CFR Part 241, Section 25. The carriers required to submit T-8 data are listed in Attachment B. BTS has determined that air carriers are not required to submit the Traffic and Capacity Statistics portion of Schedule T-8 – line 7 through line 13. The carriers will continue to submit the Operating Revenues and Expenses portion of Schedule T-8 – line 1 through line 6. Carriers currently submit detailed monthly T-100 traffic reports. From these reports, BTS or any data user can construct the Traffic and Capacity Statistics portion of Schedule T-8 because the monthly T-100 traffic reports are reported by service class and aircraft configuration, which identifies all-cargo flights. The T-100 data are available on the BTS web site at: http://www.transtats.bts.gov/databases.asp?Mode_ID=1&Mode_Desc=Aviation&Subject_ID2=0 The Schedule T-8 data may be submitted by going to the website: https://esubmit.rita.dot.gov/ and following the instructions for creating an account and submitting reports. The T-8 data is due at OAI on March 30. The file format for submitting the data is given in Attachment A. If you have any questions, please e-mail them to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Carrier Industry Profile
    FMCSA-RI-06-042 Motor Carrier Industry Profile: An Update 2004-2005 Prepared by: Thomas M. Corsi Michelle Smith Professor of Logistics Co-Director, Supply Chain Management Center Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 Prepared for: Analysis Division Office of Research and Analysis Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration August 2005 Introduction This report updates the Motor Carrier Industry Profile: 2001-20031 and Stock Market Performance of Publicly Traded Trucking Sector Stocks by Industry Segment, 2000-20042 to reflect more recent developments of particular significance to the industry and its various segments. The Motor Carrier Industry Profile: 2001-2003 relied heavily on Motor Carrier Annual Reports from over two thousand of the largest for-hire motor carriers for calendar years 2001, 2002, and 2003. However, there is a significant lag in the publication of annual report data. In fact, the 2004 calendar year data will not be available until late in 2005 or early in 2006. As a result, this report will fill in the gaps as best is possible without the benefit of the detailed annual report data. This report’s objective will be to identify trends and major events that have impacted the trucking industry during 2004 and 2005. It is based on available reports, trade journal articles, roundtable discussions, etc. The report will also update the stock market information included in Stock Market Performance of Publicly Traded Trucking Sector Stocks by Industry Segment, 2000-2004 to reflect stock market performance in the second half of 2004 and first half of 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014
    Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Freightways V. Nova Mud Corporation : Brief of Respondent Utah Court of Appeals
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 1989 Consolidated Freightways v. Nova Mud Corporation : Brief of Respondent Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Peter W. Guyon; Attorney for Appellant. Leslie Van Frank; Cohne, Rappaport & Segal; Attorney for Respondent. Recommended Citation Brief of Respondent, Consolidated Freightways v. Nova Mud Corporation, No. 890634 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1989). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/2292 This Brief of Respondent is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. UTAH COURT Of APPEALS BRIEF ITAH IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AW W3H — STATE OF UTAH 50CKET NO. Jd ***** CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS, a Delaware Corporation, RESPONDENT' S BRIEF Plaintiff/Respondent, v. No. 89-0634-CA NOVA MUD CORPORATION, Category 14(b) a Nevada Corporation. Defendant/Appellant. ***** APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED BY THE HONORABLE ROBIN REESE, THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT ***** Attorney for Respondent: LESLIE VAN FRANK (4913) of and for COHNE, RAPPAPORT & SEGAL 525 East 100 South, Suite 500 P.
    [Show full text]