Green Gas Limited: Long Term Rating Upgraded to [ICRA]AA(Stable); Short Term Rating Reaffirmed; Rated Amount Enhanced

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Gas Limited: Long Term Rating Upgraded to [ICRA]AA(Stable); Short Term Rating Reaffirmed; Rated Amount Enhanced June 07, 2019 Green Gas Limited: Long term rating upgraded to [ICRA]AA(Stable); Short term rating reaffirmed; rated amount enhanced Summary of rating action Previous Rated Amount Current Rated Instrument* Rating Action (Rs. crore) Amount(Rs. crore) Rating upgraded to [ICRA]AA Proposed Term Loan 500.00 500.00 (Stable) from [ICRA]AA-(Stable) Short term Non-Fund Based 140.0 240.0 [ICRA]A1+ reaffirmed Total 640.00 740.00 *Instrument details are provided in Annexure-1 Rationale The rating upgrade take into account the healthy financial and operational performance in FY2019 as well as the expanding distribution network in existing and new geographical areas (GAs)which would lead to increase in scale of operations of the company in the medium term. Further, GGL had undertaken significant capacity addition during FY2019 in terms of CNG stations as well as PNG connections for all segments. As a result, GGL has witnessed significant growth in scale of operations evident by 18.2% YoY revenue growth in FY2019. Moreover, with CNG sales continuing to contribute larger share of revenue, the profitability of the company is expected to remain robust going forward as CNG is a high margin segment for the company. The ratings also factors in strong promoter profile (Indian Oil Corporation Limited-IOCL-rated [ICRA]AAA(Stable)/[ICRA]A1+ and GAIL (India) Limited-GAIL-rated [ICRA]AAA(Stable)/[ICRA]A1+) which has demonstrated track record of providing managerial and operational support to the company. For any expansion in the existing and new geographical areas, ICRA expects the promoters to provide equity support to the company, if required, to maintain healthy financial profile. ICRA notes that the company has also won the authorisation for two new GAs (Unnao and Faizabad and Sultanpur both in UP) Geographical Area (GA) in the ninth round of bidding conducted by Petroleum & Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB). The total performance bank guarantees for the new GAs is Rs. 83 crore. The company is planning a capex of Rs 25-30 crore every year for the next three years for the development of CGD networks and expects to achieve volumes 0.4-0.5 mmscmd over the next five years in the new GAs. The minimum work programme includes 2 CNG Stations, 4000 household connections and 350 inch km of steel pipeline for Unnao and 4 CNG Stations, 3000 household connections and 150 inch km of steel pipeline for Faizabad and Sultanpur to be executed over a period of eight years. ICRA believes that the minimum work programme and capex requirements are moderate and given the experience of the company in executing CGD projects, its increasing cash accruals and support from promoters, it should be comfortably placed in meeting its commitments. Nevertheless, ICRA has also taken note of the company’s interest in bidding for additional cities in further rounds of competitive bidding for CGD networks. If GGL were to be a successful bidder for any of the new cities put up for bidding by the regulator, ICRA will evaluate the impact of the same on the credit risk profile of the company. The ratings also takes into account the favourable demand outlook for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vis-a-vis alternate fuels, current marketing exclusivity for Lucknow (up to 2021), Unnao, Faizabad and Sultanpur (upto 2026), infrastructure exclusivity in Lucknow (up to 2031), Agra (up to 2029), Unnao Faizabad and Sultanpur (upto 2043) , favourable regulatory support for CNG and domestic Piped Natural Gas [PNG(d)] segment evident in allocation of domestic gas to meet the entire demand under the segments and the company’s secure gas tie-up with GAIL to meet its existing natural gas demand. There has been a significant push by GoI towards use of CNG as a vehicular fuel to reduce pollution and reliance on petrol and diesel as preferred fuels. In-line with the same, GoI has ensured low price domestic gas allocation to meet 1 the entire CNG demand. The rating also factors in healthy financial risk profile characterised by healthy return indicators, robust capitalisation and coverage indicators owing to nil debt. The ratings are however constrained by the susceptibility of performance on regulatory framework for CGD entities, material shortfall in achieving the target for PNG (d) connections under the authorisation for Lucknow and significant capex plans of the company. GGL has lined up significant capex plans for Rs. 250-300 crore per annum for next 2-3 years, which is planned to be funded by debt, internal accruals and equity infusion, if required. While the large scale of the capex and the gestation period associated with build-up of sales volumes, are expected to have some moderating impact on the company’s return and key credit metrics from current levels, especially considering the company’s ambitious plans to increase the penetration of the PNG (d) segment which is a lower margin segment, nevertheless on an absolute basis, these metrics would continue to be healthy due to anticipated moderate leverage levels. ICRA also notes that GGL is significantly behind the Minimum Works Program (MWP) defined in its authorisation for Lucknow and Agra Geographical Area (GA). While the company has represented to PNGRB for rationalisation of the MWP targets, any adverse ruling by PNGRB may result in encashment of performance bank guarantee which though is relatively small (~Rs. 3 crores). Outlook: Stable The Stable outlook reflects ICRA’s expectation that GGL will maintain its EBITDA margins/scm of gas sold, follow a prudent financial policy, characterized by low leverage and good liquidity as well as support from promoters, if required for incurring capex. The outlook may be revised to ‘Positive’ in case of sustained growth in revenue and profitability. The outlook may be revised to 'Negative' if there is deterioration in margins or liquidity position. Key rating drivers Credit strengths Strong parentage being owned by GAIL and IOCL: GGL is a joint-venture set-up by GAIL and IOCL with each owning 49.97% each. The parent companies are dominant players in the oil & gas sector and have extensive experience and understanding of the domestic gas sector. Currently all the board members of GGL are from the parent companies. Any significant dilution in ownership by GAIL or IOCL could be a key rating sensitivity. Favourable outlook for CNG driven by significant cost advantage over liquid fuels and the push by the GoI promoting use of cleaner fuel: The outlook on CNG consumption is healthy due to cost advantage over petrol and diesel. Additionally, the GoI has been pushing for higher usage of clean fuel like CNG in the vehicular usage and PNG (d) in the domestic cooking usage by allocating lower cost domestic gas for these segments. This bodes well for the CGD companies as it ensures availability of natural gas to meet the demand of these segment and enables competitiveness of CNG and PNG against alternative fuels. Consumer mix tilted towards CNG, which is a relatively high margin segment: Nearly 96% of GGL’s sale are derived from the CNG segment which has relatively higher profitability vis-à-vis the PNG segment. As a result, the company has been able to generate healthy profitability with operating margins of nearly 26% and net margins of 15% in FY2019. The operating profit of the company has been increased to Rs. 81.4 crore in FY2019 vis-a-vis Rs 68.2 core in FY2018 owing to an increase in sales volumes and higher sales realisation during the year for CNG. The return indicators have also remained healthy with RoCE at ~28% in FY2019. 2 Protection afforded by the regulations under the PNGRB Act as per which authorised incumbents will enjoy monopoly with regard to network provision, further supported by pre-tax RoCE of 21%: Post the expiry of marketing exclusivity period of 5 years, the PNGRB regulations ensure a normative pre-tax RoCE of 21% for the incumbents through adequate network tariff and compression charges on the regulated assets owing to physical exclusivity of 25 years in place (starting 2021 for Lucknow and 2014 for Agra). Thus, regulations ensure fixed returns post expiry of exclusivity period. Additionally, third-party marketers face entry barriers like investment in CNG stations, tying up firm gas supplies, gas availability at competitive prices etc. Robust credit profile marked by strong networth, healthy cash accruals and nil debt: The credit profile of the company remains robust owing to strong networth driven by healthy cash accruals. The capitalisation and coverage indicators are robust owing to healthy profitability and nil debt on the balance sheet of GGL. Secure gas tie-up with GAIL for its existing operations: GGL’s sales mix comprised of 0.27 mmscmd of CNG sales and 0.01 mmscmd of PNG sales in FY2019. GGL has secured gas tie-up with GAIL gas to meet its entire gas requirement and since most of the sales are derived from CNG, domestic gas allocation for the same results in assured gas supplies. Credit challenges Modest scale of operations: The scale of operations remains moderate vis-à-vis some other large CGD companies as the network penetration has remained lower in the cities. GGL reported operating revenue of Rs. 313.1 crore in FY2019 as against Rs.251.4 crore in FY2018. The company’s CNG network comprises of 49 CNG stations and 67359 domestic PNG connections as on March 31, 2019, which indicate material expansion in the network as reflected by 31 CNG stations and 41,565 PNG (d) connections as on March 31, 2018. The benefits from the recent expansion in the network are likely to accrue over the medium term, which may help the company to expand its volume and revenue base.
Recommended publications
  • CUG No. / Email ID of JAIL OFFICIALS of up Sl.N Name of Institution Designation Mobile N0
    CUG No. / Email ID OF JAIL OFFICIALS OF UP Sl.N Name Of Institution Designation Mobile N0. Other Email ID o. /Jail 1 Head Quarter,Lucknow Inspector General Of 9454418151 0522-2624454 [email protected] Prison 0522-2626524 FAX 2230252 2 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418152 0522-2626789 0522-2616245 3 Head Quarter,Lucknow Addl.I.G.(Depart.) 9454418153 4 Head Quarter,Lucknow DIG (H.Q.) 9454418154 0522-2620734 [email protected] 5 Head Quarter,Lucknow Senior Supdt.(H.Q.) 9454418155 0522-2622390 [email protected] 6 Head Quarter,Lucknow Finance Controller 9454418156 0522-2270279 7 Head Quarter,Lucknow Executive Engineer 9454418157 0522-2273618 8 Head Quarter,Lucknow Sodh Adhikari 9454418158 0522-2273238 [email protected] 9 Head Quarter,Lucknow Asst. Engineer 9454418159 10 Head Quarter,Lucknow Camp Office of 9454418160 Inspector General Of Prison 11 Sampurna Nand Jail Addl.I.G.(Admin) 9454418161 0522-2452646 Training Center, Deputy Director 9454418162 [email protected] Lucknow Office 9454418163 [email protected] 12 Range Office, Agra DIG Prison 9454418164 0562-2605494 [email protected] Office 9454418165 13 Range Office, Meerut DIG Prison 9454418166 0121-2760129 [email protected] Office 9454418167 14 Range Office, Bareilly DIG Prison 9454418168 0581-2413416 [email protected] Office 9454418169 [email protected] 15 Range Office, Lucknow DIG Prison 9454418170 0522-2455798 [email protected] Office 9454418171 16 Range Office, Allahabad DIG Prison 9454418172 0532-2697471 [email protected] Office 9454418173 17 Range Office, DIG Prison 9454418174 0551-2344601 [email protected] Gorakhpur Office 9454418175 18 Agra, Central Jail Senior Supdt.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanpur 3. Demography
    KANPUR City Development Plan (CDP) 3. DEMOGRAPHY Kanpur is the most important metropolis and biggest city of Uttar Pradesh. According to the 2001 census, the city had a population of 25,51,337 which made it the fifth most highly -populated city in India. Among the big towns of Uttar Pradesh, the growth of Kanpur has been phenomenal. It ranked third after Lucknow and Varanasi in 1901, but by 1961 it assumed a position on top of the list. It has registered an increase of over five times from 1,97,170 in 1901 to 8,83,815 in 1961 in the course of six decades. This is mainly due to its most central location in the state. Kanpur has benefited from its fertile agricultural hinterland of the Upper Ganga Valley and Bundelkhand plateau, the available developed links of transportation and the stimulant of World War-2 with its industrial demand. In spite of a low percentage of irrigated area, the density is quite high which is mainly due to industrial concentration. 3.1 POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS As per census of 2001, Kanpur total population is 2,551,337 as compared to the 1,874,409 people registered in 1991. It may be observed that the average annual growth in population has increased to 3.5 percent during the period 1991-2001 from the average annual growth rate of 2.6 percent in the previous decade (1981-91) (Table 3.1). One of the factors for this kind of growth can be higher number of in-migration to Kanpur City from other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Sprawl: a Case Study of Lucknow City
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org Volume 4 Issue 5 || May. 2015 || PP.11-20 Urban Sprawl: A Case Study of Lucknow City Dr. (Mrs.) Kiran Kumari Associate Professor, Dept. of Geography, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Doimukh Arunachal Pradesh -791112 (India) ABSTRACT: Cities often experience growth either physically, by population, or by a combination of both. Urban sprawl in recent times is a subject of popular debate between policy makers and environmentalists in context of the status of urban people and the state of the human ecology. With the high pace of social and economic development resulting growth of urban population, lack of infrastructure, congested traffic, environmental degradation and shortage of housing became the major issues faced by the urban areas. The present paper is an attempt to identify and analyze the rate of urban growth, with a focus to explore the morphological structure and characteristic of urban sprawl in Lucknow City (capital city of the most populous state of Uttar Pradesh, situated in the middle of Gangetic Plain and spreads on the banks of the river Gomati, a left bank tributary of river Ganga) arising out of dynamic interaction between different urban functions along with historical, social, economic and administrative factors based on primary and secondary data. KEY WORDS: Low-density sprawl, Leap frog development, Ribbon sprawl, Urban Growth, Urban Sprawl I. INTRODUCTION Cities often experience growth either physically, by population, or by a combination of both. Urban sprawl is much more complicated because it may or may not qualify as urban growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Zones Infectées Au 30 Août 1984 for Criteria Used in Compiling This List, See No
    Wkly Epidem Rec No. 3$ - 31 August 19&4 - 271 - Relevé èpidém hebd. : N? 35 - 31 août 1984 Infected Areas as on 30 August 1984 — Zones infectées au 30 août 1984 For criteria used in compiling this list, see No. 12, page 92 - Les critères appliques pour la compilation de cctïe liste sont publiés dans le N° 12, page 92. X Newly reported areas - Nouvelles zones PLAGUE - PESTE GHANA Deona District Samut Songkhram Province Africa — Afrique Central Region Etawah District Samut Songkhram Dismct Gonda District Saraburi Province MADAGASCAR Eastern Region Greater Accra (excL PA) Region Gorakhpur District Muak Lek District Antananarivo Province Volta Region Kanpur District Satun Province Antananarivo- Ville Western Region Lucknow Distnct Lnngu Dismct 3* * Arrondissement IVORY COAST - CÔTE D’IVOIRE Mathura District Saura Distnct Arivonunamo S. Prèf Muzapur Distnct Thung Wa District Manalalondo District Département de l'Ouest Moradabad Distnct T rang Province Ramvohitra S Préf Man S Prefecture Muzzaiarnagar District Kan tang Distnci Antananarivo 1 KENYA Pratapgarh Distnct Trang District Suavinandriana S. Prèf Nyanza Province Saharanpur Pijftnct Wang Wiset sub-District Ampefy District Kisumu Distnct Unnao District Van Ta Khao Distnct Ankaranana District South Nyanza District Varanasi Distnct VIET NAM Aniaoetibe District W est B engal S ta te Western Province Btnh Tn Thiêo Province Fiunaranlsua province Busia Distnci Calcutta Corporation Ambatofinandrahana S P rè f Hai Phong Province INDONESIA - INDONÉSIE Ambondromisotra District LIBERIA - LIBÉRIA Ho Chi Minb Ville Soavma District X Grand Bassa County Jakarta Autonomous Capital Area Muih Hai Province Ambohtmahasoa S Prèf Montserrado County Jakarta Barat (West) Municipality Phù Khanh Province Ambohimahasoa District MOZAMBIQUE Jakarta Pusat (Genual) Municipality Quang Ninh Province Ambositra S.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoires Supprimés De La Liste Des Territoires Infectés Entre Les 17 Et 23
    — 473 — Territoires supprimés de la liste des territoires infectés entre les 17 et 23 septembre 1965 Areas removed from the infected area list Between 17 and 23 September 1965 PESTE — PLAGUE INDE — INDIA UNION DES RÉPUBLIQUES Asie — Asia Cochin (P) SOCIALISTES SOVIÉTIQUES Asie. — Asia UNION OF SOVIET Madhya Pradesh, State SOCIALIST REPUBLICS INDE — INDIA VIET-NAM, RÉP. DU Seoni» District Uzbekistan, SSR Madhya Pradesh, Slate VIET-NAM, REP, OF Maharashtra, State Kata Kalpak, ASSR Ntmar (Khandwa), District Khanh-Hoâ, Province Khorezm, Reg. Ratnagiri, District Uttar Pradesh^ State Khanhduong, District Sitapur, District IRAN Lam-Dongy Province VARIOLE — SMALLPOX Unnao, District Baluchestan & Sistan, Province Baoloc, District ChahBahar, District Afrique — Africa Iranshahr, District Saravan, District KENYA TYPHUS À POUX CHOLÉRA — CHOLERA Central Region Khorasan, Province LOUSE-BORNE TYPHUS FEVER Asie — Asia Bojnurd, District KiamBu, County GonaBad, District Eastern Region Europe Neyshabur, District BIRMANIE — BURMA Quchan, District Machakos, County Shirvan, District YOUGOSLAVIE Rangoon (PA) North-Eastern Region YUGOSLAVIA Mandalay, Division THAÏLANDE — THAILAND MALAWI Bosnie & Herzégovine Mandalay, District Bangkok Central Province Banja Luka, District RÈGLEMENT SANITAIRE INTERNATIONAL — INTERNATIONAL SANITARY REGULATIONS Certificat international de Vaccination ou de Revaccination contre International Certificate of Vaccination or Revacdnation against la Fièvre Jaune1 Yellow Fever1 Tous les Etats liés par le Règlement sanitaire international de I All States Bound by the International Sanitary Regulations of 1951, sauf la RépuBlique fédérale d’Allemagne (non liée jusqu’à 1951, except the Federal Republic of Germany (not Bound l’approBation du Règlement additionnel par les organes législatifs pending approval of the Additional Regulations by its legislative du pays) et le GaBon (réserve à l’article 102), ont accepté le Règle­ bodies) and GaBon (reservation to Article 102), have accepted the ment additionnel du 12 mai 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanpur City Development Plan
    FINAL REPORT KANPUR CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN JAWAHARLAL NEHRU August 2006 NATIONAL URBAN RENEWAL MISSION (JNNURM) JPS ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. CONSULTANTS Acknowledgement This report was prepared by a multi-sectoral team led by Mr. Pritam Kapur, Project Director, who has seen the overall co-ordination and Dr. Vinita Yadav, Project Manager, who has not only managed the project and worked on chapters but also gone through each and every chapter and carried out improvements so that consistency can be maintained in the report. The team included Mr. D.C.Awasthi (Municipal Services Expert), Mr. S.S. Mathur (Team Leader) who has worked for initial two weeks, Mr. S.K.Relan, institutional Expert, Mr. Punit Mathur and Mr. O.P. Bohra as Financial Expert and Mr. K.K. Mahapatra as Environmental Expert who have given their valuable input for different chapters. The team would also like to acknowledge the efforts put in by Mr. Shukla, Mr. Birender, Mr. Davis, Mani, Ranjit and Gopal who provided excellent administrative support in production of the final version of the report. The team appreciates the valuable feedback received from Ms. Anita Bhatnagar Jain, Divisional Commissioner, Mr. Anurag Srivastav, District Magistrate, Mr. Badal Chatterjee, Municipal Commissioner, Mr. U.N. Tiwari, Additional Commissioner of K.N.N., Mr. Deepak Kumar, Vice Chairman, KDA which helped in the improvement of the report. The team would like to place on record its appreciation of the cooperation received from Ms. Anita Bhatnagar Jain, Divisional Commissioner for bringing all the officials under one umbrella to discuss the city vision, strategies, action plan and financial investment and special thanks to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Survey Report Unnao, Part-X B, Series-22, Uttar Pradesh
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1981 SERIES- 22 UlTAR PRADESH PARTX-B TOWN SURVEY REPORT UNNAO Drafted by s.c. Tripathi Statistical Assistant SupelVised by R.M. Singh Assistant Director Edited by R.K. Singh Deputy Director Guided by CHANDAN GOPAL Of the Indian Administrative Service DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS UTTAR PRADESH FOREWORD Apart from the decennial enumeration of population, the Indian Census IS steeped in the tradition of undertaking a variety of studies of topical Interest. In fact, the publications brought out in connection with the earlier censuses contained veritable mines of Information on racial, cultural, lingUistic and a number of other aspects of life of the people of this country. With the advent of freedom, however, the scope and dimension of these special studies had to be restructured In a manner that would provide the basIc feedbacks cn the processes of development taking place In different spheres of life of the people especl(.llly under planned development Thus, In connection with the 1961 Census, a massive programme was launched inter­ alia to conduct SOClo-economlC survey of about 500 villages selected from different parts of the country The main objective of this study was to know the way of life of the people liVing In Indian Villages whIch accounted for 82 per cent of the total population as per the 1961 Census There was, however, an imperative need to extend the area of the study to urban centres as well, to provide a complete coverage of the people liVing In diverse socio-economic conditions It was with this objective in view ancillary studies on towns were launched as part of the socIal studIes programme In connection with the 1971 Census.
    [Show full text]
  • DELIVERABLES Due Date: December 1, 2013 Submitted On: December 1, 2013
    “Using Learning Camps to Improve Basic Learning Outcomes of Primary School Children” Grant No.: AID‐OAA‐F‐13‐00023 MILESTONE 1: DELIVERABLES Due Date: May 31, 2013 Submitted on: May 25, 2013 DELIVERALES PAGE NO. 1 Updated Project Implementation Plan 2 1.1 Location 2 1.2 Target Group 2 1.3 Timeline 2 2 Updated Evaluation Strategy 3 2.1 Sample Size 3 2.2 Intervention Design 4 2.3 Program Coverage 4 3 Updated List of Indicator to Measure Impact 4 3.1 Baseline and Endline 4 3.2 Testing Tool 5 3.3 Midline 5 3.4 Process Evaluation Surveys 5 4 Updated List of Indicators to Track Project Progress 6 4.1 Planning Phase 6 4.2 Implementation Phase 6 1. Updated Project Implementation Plan 1.1. Location: Sitapur and Unnao districts, Uttar Pradesh (UP) The project will be implemented in the Sitapur (blocks: Sakaran and Biswan) and Unnao (blocks: Ashoha and Hilouli) districts, of the state of Uttar Pradesh. Since this project is similar to Pratham’s Read India learning camps program, it has been decided that the project will be implemented in areas where the targeted population is not participating in any other programs. This decision also has been reinforced by research requirements for conducting RCTs – in the presence of another program, the integrity of the randomization may be threatened leading to impreciseness in measurements. Contrary to the locations given in the proposal, the project will not be implemented in the state of Madhya Pradesh because of another project being implemented, state-wide, in partnership with the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Top 20 Promising Cities
    SM@RT CITIES COUNCIL www.ConstructionWorld.inwww.ConstructionWorld.in COVER STORY SURAT NAGPUR LUCKNOW VADODARA VISAKHAPATNAM THANE JAIPUR PIMPRI CHINCHWAD INDIA’S TOP 20 PROMISING CITIES CHANDIGARH INDORE NAVI MUMBAI KANPUR KALYAN-DOMBIVLI FARIDABAD GURGAON GHAZIABAD 2 Construction World March 2013 1 RAJKOT BHOPAL LUDHIANA NASHIK SM@RT CITIES COUNCIL ndia in 2012: 153 rural, 219 transition, 84 semi-urban and 33 urban (Punjab), and Nashik (Maharashtra). In fact, representatives of these cities – districts (excluding the Northeast states and Jammu & Kashmir). And in their municipal chiefs – will be awarded at the upcoming Sm@rt Cities Summit 2025: 96 rural, 220 transition, 115 semi-urban and 58 urban districts. to be held in New Delhi in February and organised by FIRST Sm@rt Cities Council. These numbers from McKinsey & Company’s recent report, India’s Economic Geography in 2025: States, Clusters and Cities, attest to the Commissionerspeak Icountry’s growing urban sprawl. Attendant woes, though, include a big city So what makes these cities so promising? We spoke to some of their bias with the major cities consuming a bulk of natural and financial resources representatives for the answer. as well as unplanned development. As Prof Jagan Shah, Director, National For instance, Dr Amit Agrawal, Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Institute of Urban Affairs, says, “This has resulted in the sprawling of Corporation Faridabad, tells us how his city holds great promise to be a good existing urban centres with haphazard growth patterns and a corrosive effect urban centre. “The most important factor is the city’s location and connectivity,” on the surrounding region.” he reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood and Health Challenges of Riverine Communities of the River Ganga
    LIVELIHOOD AND HEALTH CHALLENGES OF RIVERINE COMMUNITIES OF THE RIVER GANGA Supported by July 2020 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF APPLIED ECONOMIC RESEARCH Parisila Bhawan, 11 Indraprastha Estate, New Delhi 110 002, India Tel: +91-11-61202698, Fax: +91-11-23370164 [email protected] www.ncaer.org NCAER | Quality . Relevance . Impact © National Council of Applied Economic Research, 2020 All rights reserved. The material in this publication is copyrighted. NCAER encourages the dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. Published by Professor Anil K. Sharma Secretary and Operations Director, NCAER The National Council of Applied Economic Research Parisila Bhawan, 11, Indraprastha Estate New Delhi–110 002 Tel: +91-11-61202698 Fax: +91-11-2337-0164 [email protected] www.ncaer.org Page | iii Foreword The river Ganga has for centuries been considered India’s holiest river, with millions believing that its waters offer salvation to its devotees. Beyond its spiritual significance, the river offers livelihoods to many riverine communities along its banks, and its waters are widely used for bathing, drinking and fishing. In recent times, there has been mounting concern about the levels of pollution in the river and the deteriorating quality of its water. Several flagship government programmes and projects in the past three decades have sought to clean the Ganga, including the Ganga Action Plan Phases I and II and the Namami Gange National Mission for Clean Ganga launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2015. These projects have sought to tackle pollution and to rejuvenate the river’s waters. Government agencies and research institutions have been tracking the effectiveness of these projects by monitoring data on the river’s water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Po Unnao Action Plan For
    ACTION PLAN FOR RESTORATION OF POLLUTED STRETCH OF RIVER SAI FROM UNNAO TO JAUNPUR River Sai Near Behta Bridge, Raebareli UTTAR PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD TC – 12V, VIBHUTI KHAND, GOMTINAGAR, LUCKNOW (UP) INDEX 1. Introduction 1-4 1.1 Polluted stretch of river Sai from Unnao to Jaunpur 5 along with drains. 2. Objective of the Action Plan 6 3. Pollution Inventory 7 3.1 Details of drains contributing the pollution 7-9 . a – f Drains (A –F) 10-15 3.2 Details of Sewage Pollution Sources 16-18 3.3 Details of Waste Management 19 . 3.3 (a) Municipal Solid Waste 19-21 . 3.3 (b) Bio- Medical Waste 22-23 . 3.3 (c) Hazardous Waste 24 . 3.3 (d) E-Waste 25 4. Details of Industrial Pollution Sources 26 4.1 Details of Industrial Units 26 4.2 Gap Analysis of Industries Situated in the catchment of 27 River Sai 5. Status of Ground Water 28-30 6. Monitoring of Pollution Sources 31 6.1 Monitoring of Drains 31 6.2 Monitoring of River 31-32 6.3 Monitoring Of Tributaries Of River Sai 32 6.4 Monitoring Of Water Polluting Industries 33 6.5 Establishment of River Sai Pollution Control Room 33-34 7. Polluted River Stretch Rejuvenation Action Plan 35-48 Apendices Appendix-1 Pollution Source Mapping of River Sai from Unnao to 50 Jaunpur Appendix-2 Details of Cities & Towns 51 Appendix-3 Details of Industries 52 Appendix-4 Details of Gram Panchayats & Revenue Villages on the 53-60 banks of River Appendix-5 Wet Lands / Water Bodies Along the River Sai 61-62 Appendix-6 Status of E-waste Management 63-66 Appendix-7 River Water Quality Data 67 Appendix-7A River Water Quality Data of Tribuatries of River Sai 68 Appendix-8 MSW improvement action plan time-line for the ULBs of 72-74 Department of Urban Development, UP 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Information of Urban Local Bodies – Uttar Pradesh
    BASIC INFORMATION OF URBAN LOCAL BODIES – UTTAR PRADESH As per 2006 As per 2001 Census Election Name of S. Growth Municipality/ Area No. of No. Class House- Total Rate Sex No. of Corporation (Sq. Male Female SC ST (SC+ ST) Women Rate Rate hold Population (1991- Ratio Wards km.) Density Membe rs 2001) Literacy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I Saharanpur Division 1 Saharanpur District 1 Saharanpur (NPP) I 25.75 76430 455754 241508 214246 39491 13 39504 21.55 176 99 887 72.31 55 20 2 Deoband (NPP) II 7.90 12174 81641 45511 36130 3515 - 3515 23.31 10334 794 65.20 25 10 3 Gangoh (NPP) II 6.00 7149 53913 29785 24128 3157 - 3157 30.86 8986 810 47.47 25 9 4 Nakur (NPP) III 17.98 3084 20715 10865 9850 2866 - 2866 36.44 1152 907 64.89 25 9 5 Sarsawan (NPP) IV 19.04 2772 16801 9016 7785 2854 26 2880 35.67 882 863 74.91 25 10 6 Rampur Maniharan (NP) III 1.52 3444 24844 13258 11586 5280 - 5280 17.28 16563 874 63.49 15 5 7 Ambehta (NP) IV 1.00 1739 13130 6920 6210 1377 - 1377 27.51 13130 897 51.11 12 4 8 Titron (NP) IV 0.98 1392 10501 5618 4883 2202 - 2202 30.53 10715 869 54.55 11 4 9 Nanauta (NP) IV 4.00 2503 16972 8970 8002 965 - 965 30.62 4243 892 60.68 13 5 10 Behat (NP) IV 1.56 2425 17162 9190 7972 1656 - 1656 17.80 11001 867 60.51 13 5 11 Chilkana Sultanpur (NP) IV 0.37 2380 16115 8615 7500 2237 - 2237 27.42 43554 871 51.74 13 5 86.1 115492 727548 389256 338292 65600 39 65639 23.38 8451 869 67.69 232 28 2 Muzaffarnagar District 12 Muzaffarnagar (NPP) I 12.05 50133 316729 167397 149332 22217 41 22258 27.19 2533 892 72.29 45 16 13 Shamli
    [Show full text]