IRN # 043786 Metropolitan School District 1380 E 6th St, Cleveland, OH 44114-1606 - Cuyahoga County 2009-2010 School Year Report Card

Current Superintendent: Eugene T. Sanders (216) 574-8000 Your District’s Designation: Number of State Value-Added Indicators Performance Not Met Measure Met out of 26 Index Continuous (0-120 points) District Improvement 2 + = above Improvement 74.3 Improvement Year 6

State Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level Your District Similar Districts State Indicators 2009-2010 2009-2010 * 2009-2010

The District Report Card for the 3rd Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent 2009-2010 school year shows the 1. Reading progress districts have made 54.4 % 61.0 % 78.4 % 2. Mathematics 51.4 % 57.3 % based on four measures of 76.9 % 4th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent performance. 3. Reading 56.4 % 61.9 % 81 % 4. Mathematics 45.6 % 55.4 % 76.2 % State 5th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent Indicators Performance Index 5. Reading 39.6 % 49.9 % 71.8 % 6. Mathematics Indicators Performance 28.8 % 42.5 % 67 % Index 7. Science 26.7 % 40.9 % 69.9 % 6th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent Value-Added AYP Measure 8. Reading 63.1 % 65.8 % 84.1 % 9. Mathematics 44.8 % 54.6 % 77.4 % Adequate Value-Added 7th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent Yearly Progress 10. Reading 58.9 % 60.2 % 80.2 % 11. Mathematics 39.3 % 45.5 % 71.1 % The combination of the four 8th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent measures is the basis for 12. Reading 61.4 % 62.1 % 80.9 % assigning state designations 13. Mathematics to districts, buildings and 41.0 % 44.2 % 69.2 % 14. Science 28.7 % 34.5 % 64.8 % community schools. Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) The state requirement is 75 percent The six designations are 15. Reading 63.8 % 71.4 % 83 % • Excellent with Distinction 16. Mathematics 58.2 % 66.8 % 80.4 % • Excellent 17. Writing 67.2 % 74.7 % 84.1 % • Effective 18. Science 44.4 % 53.2 % 73 % • Continuous Improvement 19. Social Studies 54.8 % 66.2 % 79.6 % • Academic Watch Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade) The state requirement is 85 percent • Academic Emergency 20. Reading ** 86.8 % 87.4 % 91.6 % 21. Mathematics 78.1 % 81.5 % 89.2 % State 22. Writing 92.2 % 90.3 % 93.2 % Indicators Tomeet a test indicator for grades 23. Science 68.0 % 71.9 % 85.1 % 3-8 and 10, at least 75% of students 24. Social Studies 76.4 % 80.4 % 88.7 % tested must score proficient or higher Attendance Rate The state requirement is 93 percent on that test. Other indicator requirements are: 25. All Grades 91.7 % 94.0 % 94.3 % 11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance 2008-09 Graduation Rate The state requirement is 90 percent Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. 26. District 54.3 % 71.2 % 83 %

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a . On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov -- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Similar Districts are based on comparing demographic, socioeconomic and geographic factors. Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders. * ** 2 Your District’s Assessment Results Over Time

All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results. 3rd Grade Achievement 4th Grade Achievement 100% 100% % % 5 5

7 75% ------7 75% ------d d

r 50% r 50% a a d d

n 25% 52.5 51.6 54.4 46.3 54.8 51.4 n 25% 55.4 54.4 56.4 43.1 43.2 45.6 a a t t

S 0% S 0% e e

t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 a a t Reading Mathematics t Reading Mathematics S S

5th Grade Achievement 6th Grade Achievement 100% 100% % % 5 5 7 7 75% ------75% ------d d r r 50% 50% a a d d n n 25% 39.1 38.2 39.6 25.7 24.9 28.8 27.5 27.3 26.7 25% 55.0 53.7 63.1 40.6 37.5 44.8 a a t t S S 0% 0% e e t t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 a a t t Reading Mathematics Science Reading Mathematics S S

7th Grade Achievement 8th Grade Achievement 100% 100% % % 5 5 7 75% ------7 75% ------d d r 50% r 50% a a d d n 25% 49.9 47.7 58.9 33.8 42.7 39.3 n 25% 57.9 44.3 61.4 45.6 34.8 41.0 28.7 21.2 28.7 a a t t S 0% S 0% e e t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 a a t Reading Mathematics t Reading Mathematics Science S S

State Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) Indicators The State 100% % 5

Indicators are 7 75% ------

based on state d r 50% a

assessments, as well d

n 25% 68.7 64.5 63.8 55.2 56.9 58.2 67.3 79.3 67.2 43.7 44.0 44.4 54.8 54.2 54.8 a

as on attendance and t S 0%

graduation rates. e t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 a To earn an indicator t S Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies for Achievement or Graduation Tests, at Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)* least 75% of students 100% %

must reach proficient 5 ------8 75% or above for the given - d

r 50%

assessment. a d

n 25% 88.3 89.2 86.8 74.9 76.4 78.1 91.4 91.0 92.2 65.2 63.9 68.0 75.6 76.1 76.4

For the 11th grade Ohio a t Graduation Tests indicators, S 0% e

t 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-10 a cumulative 85% passage a t rate for each assessment S Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies is required. *Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County 3 PerformancePerformance Index Index The Performance Performance Index Calculations Performance Index reflects the for the 2009-2010 School Year Index achievement of every student enrolled for the fullacademic PerformancePerformance Level Level Across Across Grades Grades year. The Performance Index is a 3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects 3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects Percentage X Weight = Points weighted average that includes all (Includes every student enrolled in Percentage X Weight = Points (Includesthe district every for a student full academic enrolled year) in tested subjects and grades and the district for a full academic year) untested students. Thegreatest 0.9 0.0 = 0.0 Untested X weight is given to advanced scores Limited 22.8 X 0.3 = 6.8 (1.2); the weights decrease for each performance level and a weight of Basic 27.9 X 0.6 = 16.8 zero is given to untested students. This results in a scale from 0 to 120 = Proficient 31.5 X 1.0 31.5 points. The Performance Index can be Accelerated 10.7 X 1.1 = 11.8 compared across years to show district achievement trends. Advanced 6.1 X 1.2 = 7.3 Performance Index Over Time Your District’s Performance Index Your District’s Performance Index 74.3 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 74.3 71.8 72.2

Value-Added Measure

Scores reflect grade level and overall composite Overall Composite + ratings for the 2009-2010 school year. Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Reading - - + + + Mathematics - - + + + Legend

Value-Added Your district’sValue-Added rating represents the progress your = Above Measure district has made with its students since last school year. + Expected Growth In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at a = Met point in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of Expected Growth progress has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has been = Below Expected Growth achieved; “Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved. -

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County 4 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Adequate Yearly Progress Grades 3-8 and 10 Reading and AYP Determination Mathematics All Students EconomicallyAsian/Pacific Disadvantaged IslanderBlack, non-HispanicAmerican Indian/AlaskaHispanic NativeMulti-Racial White, non-HispanicStudents withLimited Disabilities English Proficientby Indicator

Reading Reading Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Not Met Met Proficiency: Not Met

Mathematics Mathematics Not Met Not Met Met Not Met Met Met Met Met Not Met Not Met Proficiency: Not Met Percent Proficient

Reading Reading Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Participation: Met

Mathematics Mathematics Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Percent Tested Participation:

Graduation Graduation Rate* Not Met Rate: Not Met

Attendance Attendance Rate* Met AttendanceRate: Met Rate: AYP Determination AYP Determination Not Met by Subgroup Not Met Not Met Met Not Met Met Met Met Met Not Met Not Met for Your District: Legend

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this yearʼs AYP goals. For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways: For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways: 1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor; 3) making improvement over the previous year. 4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results. The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate) * are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

N/A Not applicable.

NR Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisti- cally reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

Met This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

Not Met This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every school and district must meet AYP goals that are set for Reading and Mathematics 2008-2009 Proficiency and Participation, Attendance Rate, and Graduation Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students, Graduation Rate Information AYP Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific Islander Students, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/Alaska American Indian/ Asian or Black, Econ. Native Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White, Alaska Native Pacific Islander non-Hispanic Disadvtgd non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students with 41.2% 54.3% 60.3% 56.4% Limited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet Limited English Students with White, AYP in Reading or Mathematics Proficiency, or in Participation, Attendance Hispanic Proficient Multi-Racial Disabilities non-Hispanic Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP. Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and state 33% 41.7% 48.9% 62.4% 54.1% consequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district being The disaggregated graduation rates of your district are provided for identified for improvement. State consequences could include a reduction informational purposes only and are not used for your AYP determination. in the state’s rating designation.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County 5 State and Federally Required District Information

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level Limited American Asian or Non- Students Non- Econ. Black, Pacific Hispanic Multi- White, Disabled Migrant Econ. English Female Male non-Hispanic Indian/ Racial non-Hispanic with Disadvtgd Alaska Native Islander Students Disabilities Disadvtgd Proficient Percentage of Students Scoring Limited Reading 22.4 14.5 9.1 20.0 16.7 12.4 14.7 38.7 -- 2.2 20.3 25.3 17.1 23.4 Writing 7.2 0.0 5.3 7.2 10.0 5.4 2.0 26.8 -- -- 7.0 13.8 4.5 9.4 Mathematics 32.5 16.4 7.0 26.6 18.7 16.7 22.4 49.2 -- 4.4 28.7 33.1 27.3 29.9 Science 25.0 20.0 6.8 19.0 14.6 10.1 16.4 39.2 -- 0.0 21.6 25.1 20.7 22.4 Social Studies 24.8 16.7 10.5 23.8 10.0 13.8 14.8 53.6 -- -- 22.6 29.0 22.0 23.3 Percentage of Students Scoring Basic Reading 24.8 16.4 14.0 22.1 17.7 18.1 20.2 32.6 -- 17.8 23.1 23.6 21.1 25.0 Writing 25.7 41.7 31.6 27.5 23.3 24.7 20.3 47.8 -- -- 25.8 39.2 20.4 31.2 Mathematics 28.8 20.0 12.6 25.8 25.7 23.0 26.2 31.0 -- 24.4 27.3 26.4 27.5 27.1 Science 46.6 32.0 33.9 47.5 45.5 39.0 44.9 46.7 -- 23.1 45.4 51.0 46.3 44.3 Social Studies 22.7 25.0 31.6 27.2 23.3 17.3 22.0 24.5 -- -- 22.5 32.1 23.7 21.3 Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient Reading 37.2 40.0 41.3 39.5 39.4 39.3 43.4 19.5 -- 44.4 37.9 37.6 40.7 35.2 Writing 51.7 25.0 52.6 49.2 48.3 46.8 58.4 19.0 -- -- 50.5 36.9 55.1 46.0 Mathematics 25.7 32.7 27.3 30.2 30.5 31.7 32.1 11.7 -- 28.9 27.4 25.9 28.6 26.1 Science 19.3 32.0 23.7 23.7 28.2 27.8 25.6 7.1 -- 30.8 21.4 17.8 22.1 20.7 Social Studies 32.5 33.3 36.8 31.1 36.7 32.4 37.9 10.9 -- -- 32.5 29.0 34.2 30.8 Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated Reading 10.7 21.8 19.6 12.5 18.5 19.6 15.3 3.8 -- 24.4 12.6 9.5 14.2 11.2 Writing 14.5 33.3 10.5 15.4 16.7 21.1 19.3 0.9 -- -- 15.6 9.2 19.2 12.1 Mathematics 7.9 23.6 23.8 10.3 14.9 13.8 11.6 2.4 -- 31.1 9.4 9.1 9.8 9.2 Science 6.2 12.0 18.6 7.4 9.9 15.4 9.7 2.0 -- 30.8 7.9 4.0 7.8 8.1 Social Studies 10.9 8.3 0.0 9.3 15.0 17.1 13.9 2.5 -- -- 11.6 2.3 11.3 11.9 Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced Reading 4.9 7.3 16.1 5.8 7.7 10.6 6.3 5.3 -- 11.1 6.1 4.0 6.9 5.2 Writing 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.7 2.1 0.0 5.4 -- -- 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.4 Mathematics 5.2 7.3 29.4 7.1 10.2 14.7 7.7 5.6 -- 11.1 7.2 5.4 6.8 7.7 Science 2.9 4.0 16.9 2.4 1.9 7.7 3.3 5.0 -- 15.4 3.7 2.1 3.0 4.4 Social Studies 9.1 16.7 21.1 8.6 15.0 19.4 11.4 8.4 -- -- 10.8 7.6 8.8 12.7 Your District’s Students 2009-2010

Average Daily Black, American Asian or White, Limited Students Student Economically non- Indian or Pacific Hispanic Multi-Racial non- Disadvantaged English with Migrant Enrollment Hispanic Alaska Native Islander Hispanic Proficient Disabilities 46697 69.0% 0.3% 0.6% 12.2% 3.1% 14.8% 100.0% 5.5% 22.3% --

Number of Limited English Proficient Students -- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Excluded from Accountability Calculations 258 Under the federal Federally Required School Teacher Information No Child Left Behind High-Poverty Low-Poverty All Schools in Schools Located Schools Located Act, states are Your District in Your District* in Your District* required to report certain data about Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor’s Degree 99.9 99.9 0.0 schools and teachers. Data presented here Percentage of teachers with at least a Master’s Degree 45.7 45.7 0.0 are for reporting Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary purposes only and classes not taught by highly qualified teachers 9.6 9.6 -- are not used in the Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary computation of the classes taught by properly certified teachers 96.3 96.3 -- state designation Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by for districts and teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure 0.0 0.0 -- schools. -- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. *High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County 6 Schools in School Improvement

Name of the School & Years in Improvement Generally, a school will enter School Improvement (SI) after missing AYP Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status for two consecutive years, and it can exit SI only after meeting AYP for two

Adlai Stevenson School 4 Albert B Hart 9 consecutive years. Alexander Graham Bell 3 Almira 5 Every school in SI has to create an Andrew J Rickoff 7 Anton Grdina 4 improvement plan. If a school in SI Artemus Ward 2 Audubon 6 receives federal funds, it may have to Benjamin Franklin 3 Bolton 2 Brooklawn 5 Buckeye-Woodland School 4 offer Public School Choice and/or Buhrer 6 Captain Arthur Roth 2 Supplemental Educational Services. Carl & Louis Stokes Central Academy 7 Carl F Shuler 6 Being in SI for three or more years Case 4 Charles A Mooney School 6 Charles Dickens School 6 Charles W Eliot School 6 requires more extensive corrective Clara E Westropp School 4 Clark School 3 actions and, eventually, restructuring. Daniel E Morgan School 4 Denison 3 Forest Hill Parkway Elementary School 2 Fullerton School 5 Genesis Academy 7 George Washington Carver 4 Giddings 4 1 Gracemount 4 H Barbara Booker Elementary School 4 Hannah Gibbons-Nottingham Elementary 4 Harvey Rice Elementary School 4 Henry W Longfellow Elementary School 3 Iowa-Maple Elementary School 4 James Ford Rhodes High School 6 Jane Addams Business Careers High School 2 John Adams High School 3 John D Rockefeller Elementary School 4 John Marshall High School 7 John W Raper School 2 Joseph F Landis School 4 Joseph M Gallagher School 9 Kenneth W Clement 1 Louis Agassiz School 4 Louisa May Alcott Elementary School 1 Luis Munoz Marin School 8 Marion C Seltzer Elementary School 3 Marion-Sterling Elementary School 4 Martin Luther King Jr Career Campus 6 Mary M Bethune 4 Max S Hayes High School 5 McKinley School 4 Memorial School 3 Michael R. White 2 Miles Park School 3 Miles School 5 Mound Elementary School 4 Nathan Hale School 9 Newton D Baker School 1 Oliver H Perry Elementary School 2 Option Complex 7 Orchard School 3 Patrick Henry School 7 Paul L Dunbar Elementary School 3 Paul Revere Elementary School 5 Riverside School 2 Robert Fulton School 4 Robert H Jamison School 6 Robinson G Jones Elementary School 2 Scranton School 3 South High School 7 SuccessTech Academy School 1 Sunbeam 3 Tremont Montessori School 2 Union Elementary School 5 Wade Park 4 Walton School 5 Warner Girls Leadership Academy 1 Watterson-Lake School 1 Waverly Elementary School 4 Wilbur Wright School 7 Willow School 4

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationally representative and continuing To view Ohio’s most recent assessment that enables the comparision of performance in Ohio and other states in various NAEP results, subject areas. Schools and students within each state are selected randomly to be a part of the go to: assessment. Not all students in the state or in a particular school take the assessment. http://education.ohio.gov Data are reported at the state level only, and there are no individual student or even school and search for key word “NAEP” summary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County Determining Your District's Rating 7 Determining your district’s report card designation is a multi-step process. The first step is to determine a preliminary designation, which is based on the following components: 1) the percentage of indicators met, 2) the performance index and 3) AYP determination.

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation 94%-100% or 100 to 120 and Met or Not Met = Excellent

75%-93.9% or 90 to 99.9 and Met or Not Met = Effective

0%-74.9% or 0 to 89.9 and Met = Continuous Improvement 50%-74.9% or 80 to 89.9 and Not Met =

31%-49.9 % or 70 to 79.9 and Not Met = Academic Watch

0%-30.9% and 0 to 69.9 and Not Met = Academic Emergency

The preliminary designation results from identifying the Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added, higher value between the percentage of indicators met by the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated your district and your district’s performance index. AYP to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s final then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminary designation. designation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation. 1. If your district’s rating is restricted to Continuous 1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can be Improvement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have no rated no lower than Continuous Improvement. impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation. 2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP in 2. If your district experiences above expected growth for at more than one student group, it can be rated no least two consecutive years, your district’s final higher than Continuous Improvement. designation will increase by one designation. 3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the 3. If your district experiences below expected growth for at preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designation least three consecutive years, your district’s final becomes the final designation. designation will decrease by one designation.

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years Excellent with Distinction Excellent and or Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years Effective Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years Excellent Effective and or Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years Continuous Improvement Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years Effective Continuous Improvement and or Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years Academic Watch

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years Continuous Improvement Academic Watch and or Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years Academic Emergency Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years Academic Watch Academic Emergency and or Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years Academic Emergency *In all other cases, including if your district’s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will have no impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Cuyahoga County