DOCSLIB.ORG

Puketapapa - Mt Roskill Heritage Survey 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Puketapapa - Mt Roskill Heritage Survey 2013 PUKETAPAPA - MT ROSKILL HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 PREPARED FOR AUCKLAND COUNCIL BY MATTHEWS & MATTHEWS ARCHITECTS LTD IN ASSOCIATION WITH LISA TRUTTMAN Issue 3 –February 2014 PUKETAPAPA HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Cover image: 1914 Map of the County of Eden. Sir George Grey Special Collections, Auckland Libraries, NZ Map 4661. Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Brief ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology and Approach ........................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Study area ............................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Overview of report structure and component parts ................................................. 5 2.0 PUKETAPAPA STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES ...... 7 Appendix 1: Thematic Historic Overview ............................................................................... 12 Appendix 2: Places prioritised for research and assessment and summary sheets .................. 13 Appendix 3: Other Places of Potential interest ........................................................................ 37 Appendix 4: Special Character Areas Assessments................................................................. 48 HERITAGE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT FINAL REV. FEB 2014 3 PUKETAPAPA HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION make a preliminary identification of places or areas that may potentially be of historic heritage value, that may warrant further investigation. 1.1 Brief Stage 2: More detailed research and field The purpose of this study is to undertake a survey work to: Heritage Survey of the Puketapapa-Mt Roskill Prepare a developed study list of places study area. The aim of the study is to provide and/ or areas that warrant further research, analysis and recommendations for investigation. historic heritage places and areas; and special character. Stage 3: Detailed research, analysis and assessment of places/ areas with 1.2 Methodology and Approach recommendations for statutory management where appropriate. The Puketapapa Heritage Survey has been based on Auckland Council’s methodologies The process is interactive; more detailed as set out in the Historic Heritage Area research may lead to priorities for ongoing Assessments: Draft Interim Guidance (October work being adjusted. Constraints on timeframe 2012). This study focused on built historic for the work also restrict the numbers of places heritage and character and has been that can be assessed in detail. undertaken by Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd in association with historian Lisa Project Brief Truttman. The brief for this study includes: Within the timeframe available, this study Stage 1: focused on built historic heritage and special character. Natural heritage, archaeology and 1) Undertake a reconnaissance Level 2 Maori heritage did not form part of the specific survey that is limited to selected areas and project brief. topics within the Puketapapa Local Board Area. This should meet the requirements The Heritage Survey process has followed a set out in the HHAA Interim Guidance for a logical staged approach. The study required a Rapid (level 2) HHAA. This includes the Detailed (Level 3) assessment, of targeted following outcomes for selected areas: areas, which involves broad contextual Historic and Thematic Context research and initial identification of places of Statement, supported by the potential interest, followed by prioritized study appropriate maps and a list of lists and detailed research and assessment. proposed themes to include in the Recommendations have been made for Auckland Council research framework specific controls and management where Form a “study list” of historic heritage appropriate, for scheduling and/ or special places that appear eligible for character overlays. In general the stages of scheduling, including buildings, work include: structures and areas. Stage 1: Broad research, preliminary field Form a “study list” of areas that appear survey work and information gathering to: eligible for special character overlay. understand the historic development of Prepare a high-level “Strengths the area as a whole and understand Weaknesses Opportunities Threats individual places or areas in context, (SWOT) analysis that is relevant to the selected areas and provide strategic enable preparation of a written thematic management recommendations, in historic overview, with supporting historic relation to built heritage and special maps and photos, and summarise places character. already identified as being of historic heritage value, HERITAGE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT FINAL REV. FEB 2014 4 PUKETAPAPA HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Stage 2: Appendix 3: Other Places of Potential interest Appendix 4: Residential Character Areas Prepare detailed Level 3 survey of identified priority places identified on the study lists. This survey will create an Preparation of the Thematic Historic Overview evidence base of sufficient detail to was the important starting point for the study. It support proposed scheduling of new involved broad research, including places. investigation of early land survey and Add to/ enhance the Historic and subdivision maps, published histories and a Thematic Context Statement with wide range of documentary research sources. information that supports the importance of priority places. This may The Thematic Historic Overview helps to include additional mapping and understand historic heritage places and areas broader development of key themes. in context and provides the basis for the more detailed research and investigations carried Historic Heritage evaluation of priority out. This stage also involved site visits around places, at a level of detail that will the study area to look at places and areas that support scheduling. might be important in representing particular Evaluation of eligible Special themes in the historic development of the area. Character Areas, based on Council’s methodology. Developing an understanding of the key themes in the development of the area is a 1.3 The Study area way of interpreting heritage values within context and looking at the full range of types of The study area covers the entire Local Board heritage that may be present. It also enables Area, at an outline level. Preparatory work places of local importance to be appreciated done by the Local Board identified specific and understood together with the more iconic areas of interest where more detailed survey is buildings or structures. warranted, shown on the following map of the study area. (Refer study area map, Figure 1). The thematic historic overview was prepared by historian Lisa Truttman with assistance from Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd. As 1.4 Acknowledgements the study has progressed, further information gathered during detailed research on particular The assistance of the following organisations places has been incorporated where during the preparation of this study is gratefully appropriate into the historic thematic overview. acknowledged: Puketapapa Local Board Based on the thematic overview and Auckland Council Heritage team preliminary site visits, and with input from the Mt Roskill Puketapapa Historical Society Local Board and Puketapapa Historical Auckland Libraries Society, ‘study lists’ of places and areas that Mt Roskill Library were of potential interest were identified. Auckland Council Archives Auckland Architecture Archive Where preliminary research highlighted values Archives of the Anglican Diocese of Auckland that appeared significant, priorities for more detailed investigation were developed. 1.5 Overview of report structure and Within the project timeframes, a number of component parts places were prioritised for detailed research and assessed for potential formal This report provides an overview of the management through the unitary plan, Puketapapa heritage survey. The report including scheduling and character overlays. provides a summary of key issues and recommendations in relation to built heritage The detailed components of work including and character. assessments of historic heritage places, and assessments of residential character areas are The appendices which follow include: included in the appendices. Appendix 1: Thematic Historic Overview Appendix 2: Places prioritised for research and assessment and summary sheets. HERITAGE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT FINAL REV. FEB 2014 5 PUKETAPAPA HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 Figure 1: Puketapapa Study area Indicative areas of focus are highlighted in red. HERITAGE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT FINAL REV. FEB 2014 6 PUKETAPAPA HERITAGE SURVEY 2013 2.0 PUKETAPAPA STUDY AREA-SUMMARY OF HISTORIC HERITAGE ISSUES Following is an overview of the issues identified in relation to built heritage and character, and key recommendations to enhance understanding of historic heritage places in Puketapapa as well as recommendations for management. The Pah Homestead, 72 Hillsborough Road, Hillsborough With input from members of the Local Board and the Mt Roskill Puketapapa Historical Society, research and field survey work confirms that there are a range of historic buildings, as well as areas, that are significant in representing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dominion Road Project Overview 2013 05 17.Indd
    Bond Street DOMINION ROAD UPGRADE PROJECT OVERVIEW VERSION 1 / REVISION 3 ͳ 22ND MAY 2013 Monkey Hill Reserve George Street View Road KOWHAI INTERMEDIATE FICINO Esplanade Road z SCHOOL Onslow Road Lisnoe Avenue Bellevue Road Mt Eden Road Eden Park Walters Road Carrick Place Eden Valley Village Centre Valley Road MOUNT Bellwood Avenue EDEN NORMAL I.T.S Ewington Avenue Burnley Terrace Typical Midblock King Edward Street Prospect Terrace Paice Avenue Grange Road Elizabeth Street Milton Road Saint Albans Avenue KOHIA SCHOOL Balmoral Village Centre BALMORAL Herbert Road SCHOOL Mont Le Grand Road AUCKLAND NORMAL Mount Pleasant Road Brixton Road Dexter Avenue Dunbar Road Balmoral Road Paddinton Green Reserve Mount Roskill Village Center Wiremu street EDENDALE SCHOOL Balmoral Road Balmoral SDA LEGEND Tennyson Street Rocklands Avenue Bus Stops Parallel Cycle Routes Halston Road Carmen Avenue Neighbourhood Bus Cycleway - Greenways Queens Avenue Interchanges Denbigh Avenue Intersection Telford Avenue Dedicated Cycle Lane MAUNGAWHAU New Parking Facili es GOOD SCHOOL SHEPHERD Kensington Avenue SCHOOL Local Area Traffi c Halesowen Avenue I.T.S ITS Parking Trial (May - Management Features Marsden Avenue June) Widened Shared Path Centennial Park Calgary Street Raised Medians and Pedestrian Crossings Mini Round-a-bout Peary Road Wembly Road Pedestrian Controlled Signalised Crossing Lane Realignment Shackleton Road Lambeth Road Signalised Intersec on Right Turn Bay Invermay Avenue Relocate Dairy Sandringham Road Parks Aff ected by Cycleway Hazel Avenue Landscape
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Commonwealth Games Statistics–Men's 5000M (3 Mi Before
    2014 Commonwealth Games Statistics –Men’s 5000m (3 mi before 1970) by K Ken Nakamura All time performance list at the Commonwealth Games Performance Performer Time Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 12:56.41 Augustine Choge KEN 1 Melbourne 2006 2 2 12:58.19 Craig Mottram AUS 2 Melbourne 2006 3 3 13:05.30 Benjamin Limo KEN 3 Melbourne 2006 4 4 13:05.89 Joseph Ebuya KEN 4 Melbourne 2006 5 5 13:12.76 Fabian Joseph TAN 5 Melbourne 2006 6 6 13:13.51 Sammy Kipketer KEN 1 Manchester 2002 7 13:13.57 Benjamin Limo 2 Manchester 2002 8 7 13:14.3 Ben Jipcho KEN 1 Christchurch 1974 9 8 13.14.6 Brendan Foster GBR 2 Christchurch 1974 10 9 13:18.02 Willy Kiptoo Kirui KEN 3 Manchester 2002 11 10 13:19.43 John Mayock ENG 4 Manchester 2002 12 11 13:19.45 Sam Haughian ENG 5 Manchester 2002 13 12 13:22.57 Daniel Komen KEN 1 Kuala Lumpur 1998 14 13 13:22.85 Ian Stewart SCO 1 Edinburgh 1970 15 14 13:23.00 Rob Denmark ENG 1 Victoria 1994 16 15 13:23.04 Henry Rono KEN 1 Edmonton 1978 17 16 13:23.20 Phillimon Hanneck ZIM 2 Victoria 1994 18 17 13:23.34 Ian McCafferty SCO 2 Edinburgh 1970 19 18 13:23.52 Dave Black ENG 3 Christchurch 1974 20 19 13:23.54 John Nuttall ENG 3 Victoria 1994 21 20 13:23.96 Jon Brown ENG 4 Victoria 1994 22 21 13:24.03 Damian Chopa TAN 6 Melbourne 2006 23 22 13:24.07 Philip Mosima KEN 5 Victoria 1994 24 23 13:24.11 Steve Ovett ENG 1 Edinburgh 1986 25 24 13:24.86 Andrew Lloyd AUS 1 Auckland 1990 26 25 13:24.94 John Ngugi KEN 2 Auckland 1990 27 26 13:25.06 Moses Kipsiro UGA 7 Melbourne 2006 28 13:25.21 Craig Mottram 6 Manchester 2002 29 27 13:25.63
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    NEW ZEALAND OLYMPIC COMMITTEE 2011 100TH ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE REPORTS President’s Report 2 Secretary General’s Report 4 GAMES REPORTS Games Time Planning 8 Commonwealth Youth Games – Isle of Man 9 PROMOTING THE OLYMPIC MOVEMENT Commercial and Marketing Activity 10 Events and Celebrations 14 Museum and Education 16 Athletes’ Commission 18 FINANCIAL REPORTS New Zealand Olympic Committee Financial Report 19 New Zealand Olympic Academy Financial Report 33 IOC and Olympic Solidarity Funding 40 New Zealand Olympic Committee Executive and Staff Lists 43 1 NEW ZEALAND OLYMPIC CoMMITTEE 2011 100TH ANNUAL REPORT PRESIDENt’s REPORT IN 2011 THE NEW ZEALAND Our relationships within the Olympic Movement have The ‘Making us Proud’ marketing campaign was OLYMPIC CoMMITTEE (NZOC) the potential to provide commercial as well as sporting launched in 2011 and has provided commercial partners CELEBRATED ITS CENTENARY AND benefits to New Zealand. Our international position with opportunities for returns on objectives as well was strengthened when it was confirmed that Barbara as ways for New Zealanders to be proud and inspire RECOGNISED THE CONTRIBUTION Kendall would again serve on the IOC. our Olympic team. The establishment of the NZOC’s OF THOSE WHO THROUGHOUT As part of the review of its constitution the NZOC will, President’s Council, which draws on the expertise THE DECADES HAVE WORKED for the first time, go to the public for applications for of some of New Zealand’s leading business and TIRELESSLY TO PROMOTE THE upcoming board positions. This will enable us to source community leaders, is an initiative to further strengthen OLYMPIC MOVEMENT IN NEW the very best candidates to steer our organisation into our financial position.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Minnesota
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Announces Its ;Uafclt eommellcemellt 1961 NORTHROP MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM THURSDAY EVENING, MARCH 16 AT EIGHT-THIRTY O'CLOCK Univcrsitp uf Minncsuta THE BOARD OF REGENTS Dr. O. Meredith Wilson, President Mr. Laurence R. Lunden, Secretary Mr. Clinton T. Johnson, Treasurer Mr. Sterling B. Garrison, Assistant Sccretary The Honorable Ray J. Quinlivan, St. Cloud First Vice President and Chairman The Honorable Charles W. Mayo, M.D., Rochester Second Vice President The Honorable James F. Bell, Minneapolis The Honorable Edward B. Cosgrove, Le Sueur The Honorable Daniel C. Gainey, Owatonna The Honorable Richard 1. Griggs, Duluth The Honorable Robert E. Hess, White Bear Lake The Honorable Marjorie J. Howard (Mrs. C. Edward), Excelsior The Honorable A. I. Johnson, Benson The Honorable Lester A. Malkerson, Minneapolis The Honorable A. J. Olson, Renville The Honorable Herman F. Skyberg, Fisher As a courtesy to those attending functions, and out of respect for the character of the building, be it resolved by the Board of Regents that there be printed in the programs of all functions held in Cyrus Northrop Memorial Auditorium a request that smoking be confined to the outer lobby on the main floor, to the gallery lobbies, and to the lounge rooms, and that members of the audience be not allowed to use cameras in the Auditorium. r/tis Js VOUf UnivcfsilU CHARTERED in February, 1851, by the Legislative Assembly of the Territory of Minnesota, the University of Minnesota this year celebrated its one hundred and tenth birthday. As from its very beginning, the University is dedicated to the task of training the youth of today, the citizens of tomorrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Ernest Whitaker and Charles Stanislaus Stafford at Te Aroha
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato HARRY AND CHARLES: HENRY ERNEST WHITAKER AND CHARLES STANISLAUS STAFFORD AT TE AROHA Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 159 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 HARRY AND CHARLES: HENRY ERNEST WHITAKER AND CHARLES STANISLAUS STAFFORD AT TE AROHA Abstract: Harry Whitaker was a member of a prominent political family, and Charles Stanislaus Stafford came from an Anglo-Irish landowning family. They both invested in mines in the Te Aroha district, Whitaker being particularly active in promoting the interests of the mining industry. But he was also seen as manipulating the share market to benefit himself and as assisting Josiah Clifton Firth’s ‘clique’ to control the field, meaning that for many residents some of his actions were deeply unpopular. Both men acquired and traded in land both within and outside the settlements, and developed their Wairakau estate, all profitably. Whitaker also established the Te Aroha News, and in a variety of ways was a leading member of the community. As a member of the county council he tried to help the district, but once again was seen as working too closely with Firth for their mutual benefit. Stafford also tried to assist local development. Both men were prominent socially, notably in horse races and various sports. Whitaker in particular was renowned for his lively personality, personal charm, and elegant attire, but unusually did not marry nor, apparently, flirt with the opposite sex, which may or may not be significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Progression of New Zealand National Records/Best Performances
    Chronological Progression of New Zealand National Records/Best Performances Men 3 miles/5000m 3 miles 16:03.4 Peter Morrison Dunedin (Car) 14 December 1889 15:40.4 Derisley Wood Auckland (Domain) 7 February 1891 15:27.2 William Burke Dunedin 29 May 1893 14:49.0 William Simpson Auckland (Domain) 21 December 1901 14:45.2 Randolph Rose Wanganui 28 February 1925 14:29.2 Randolph Rose Wellington 26 March 1927 14:14.8 Jack Lovelock London GBR 15 August 1936 14:07.0 Cecil Matthews Wellington (BR) 11 December 1937 13:59.6 Cecil Matthews Sydney AUS 5 February 1938 13:55.8 Ernest Haskell Auckland (OS) 13 February 1954 13:54.4 Bill Baillie Auckland (OS) 31 January 1955 13:42.6 Kerry Williams 20 December 1955 13:38.7 Murray Halberg Otahuhu 2 February 1956 13:14.96 Murray Halberg Cardiff GBR 22 July 1958 13:11.4 Murray Halberg Auckland (OS) 13 February 1960 5000m 14:49.6 William Savidan Los Angeles USA 5 August 1932 13:35.2 Murray Halberg Stockholm SWE 25 July 1961 13:35.0 Dick Quax Hamilton (Por) 12 February 1972 13:28.50 Dick Quax Stockholm SWE 25 July 1973 13:27.2 Dick Quax Helsinki FIN 30 July 1973 13:18.33 Dick Quax Stockholm SWE 7 August 1973 13:13.10 Dick Quax Stockholm SWE 5 July 1976 13:12.86 Dick Quax Stockholm SWE 5 July 1977 13:10.19 Adrian Blincoe Heusden BEL 20 July 2008 6 miles/10000m 6 miles 30:49.6 William Savidan Hamilton 16 August 1930 29:57.4 Harold Nelson Dunedin (Car) 5 March 1948 29:43.4 Lawrence King Dunedin (Car) 20 February 1953 29:06.8 Lawrence King Auckland (OS) 17 January 1955 28:53.8 Bill Rodger Auckland 6 February 1956
    [Show full text]
  • 198 202 Dominion Road Interim Environment Court
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 02-4- IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bunting Hearing: 20-23, 26-27 August and 24-25 September 2019 Counsel: D J Minhinnick and S H Pilkington for the Appellant D Hartley, A Buchanan and B Ford for the Respondent Mr R Peters, Mr R Bannan, Mr R Dexter, Ms A Modrow, Mrs N Smith, Mr P Lange and Mr L Whiley- s 274 parties - for themselves Date of Decision: 6 March 2020 Date of Issue: - 9 MAR 2020 INTERIM RESERVED DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT 2 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 The initial proposal and the Independent Hearing Commissioners' decision ......................... 9 The proposal ....................................................................................................................... 1O The Evidence Design ...... ·................................................................................................ 11 The Closing Design ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions
    Attachment 5 Local Board Resolutions Contents Albert Eden ............................................................................................................................. 2 Devonport-Takapuna .............................................................................................................. 5 Franklin ................................................................................................................................... 7 Great Barrier ......................................................................................................................... 13 Henderson-Massey ............................................................................................................... 17 Hibiscus and Bays ................................................................................................................ 21 Howick .................................................................................................................................. 28 Kaipatiki ................................................................................................................................ 31 Mangere-Otahuhu ................................................................................................................. 38 Manurewa ............................................................................................................................. 42 Maungakiekie-Tamaki ........................................................................................................... 49 Orakei ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Design Landscape and Visual Effect Assessment Report
    ABC194 Urban Design, Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment Prepared for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd FINAL 30 April 2021 Document Quality Assurance Bibliographic reference for citation: Boffa Miskell Limited 2021. ABC194: Urban Design, Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment. Report prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited for Pudong Housing Development Ltd & Foodstuffs (NZ) Ltd. Prepared by: Rachel de Lambert Partner Landscape Architect Boffa Miskell Limited Reviewed by: Ben Clark Associate Principal Urban Designer Boffa Miskell Limited Status: FINAL Revision / version: 6 Issue date: 30 April 2021 Use and Reliance This report has been prepared by Boffa Miskell Limited on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Boffa Miskell does not accept any liability or responsibility in relation to the use of this report contrary to the above, or to any person other than the Client. Any use or reliance by a third party is at that party's own risk. Where information has been supplied by the Client or obtained from other external sources, it has been assumed that it is accurate, without independent verification, unless otherwise indicated. No liability or responsibility is accepted by Boffa Miskell Limited for any errors or omissions to the extent that they arise from inaccurate information provided by the Client or any external source. Template revision: 20190517 0000 File ref: Document2 Template ref: Urban Design
    [Show full text]
  • Are Drugs Destroying Sport?
    Can C 0 U n t r i e s Fin d Coo per a tiD n Ami d the R u i nos 0 feD n f lie t ? ARE DRUGS IN THI S IS SUE DESTROYING The Gann Years: Colm Connolly '91 Wins Hail to "The Counselor" A Retrospective High-Profile Murder Case Sonja Henning '95 SPORT? Page 8 Letters to the Editor If you want to respond to an article in Duke Law, you can e-mail the editor at [email protected] or write: Mirinda Kossoff Duke Law Magazine Duke University School of Law Box 90389 Durham, NC 27708-0389 , a Interim Dean's Message Features Ethnic Strife: Can Countries Find Cooperation Amid the Ruins of Conflict? .. ..... ... ...... ...... ...... .............. .... ... ... .. ............ 2 The Gann Years: A Retrospective .. ............. ..... ................. .... ..... .. ................ ..... ...... ......... 5 Are Drugs Destroying Sport? .. ..................................... .... .. .............. .. ........ .. ... ....... .... ... 8 Alumni Snapshots Colm Connolly '91 Wins Conviction and Fame in High-Profile Murder Case ................... .................. ... .. ..... ..... ... .... .... ...... ....... ....... ..... 12 Sonja Henning '95: Hail to "The Counselor" on the Basketball Court ........................ .. 14 U.N. Insider Michael Scharf '88 Puts International Experience to Work in Academe ................................... ..................... ... .............................. ....... 15 Faculty Perspectives Q&A: Can You Treat a Financially Troubled Country Like a Bankrupt Company? .. ..... ... 17 The Docket Professor John Weistart: The Man
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Peter Leitch Club at MT SMART STADIUM, HOME of the MIGHTY VODAFONE WARRIORS
    Sir Peter Leitch Club AT MT SMART STADIUM, HOME OF THE MIGHTY VODAFONE WARRIORS 5th September 2018 Newsletter #233 Congratulations to the Vodafone Warriors on making the 2018 NRL Finals Congratulations Simon on playing your 300th game for the Vodafone Warriors we hope you enjoyed the night as we all did. Photos courtesy of www.photosport.nz Bloody, Penrith, Dragons and Broncos...give me a break By David Kemeys Former Sunday Star-Times Editor, Former Editor-in-Chief Suburban Newspapers, Long Suffering Warriors Fan HIS IS why I am not an NRL tipster. TLast week I boldly opined that to get a home game we would need to beat the Raiders – which happened – and have results go our way – which didn’t. The Storm did not beat the Panthers and blew the Minor Premiership, buggering everything. The Roosters, as predicted, were way too good for the Eels and snatched the Minor Premiership. Souths ended their slump by beating a Tigers side that barely looked interested to finish third. The Sharks at least made me look semi-competent, beating the Dogs to go fourth. The Panthers, as mentioned, pulled off an upset no-one saw coming, and that left them in fifth. The Broncos crushed Manly and rose to sixth, only failing to edge the Panthers – having finished on the same points and differential – because they had more points conceded. The Dragons beat Newcastle yet dropped to seventh. All of which saw us, despite our win over Canberra, at an almost disappointing eighth. Being there is the only thing, and our last finals experience in 2011 took us all the way to the final from the same spot, so why not again? It’s doubtful even if I wish I could say differently, but I cannot see it happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B, Sec H
    APPENDIX B (PLANNING MAPS) the ground) greater than 600mm; H06-03 BUILDING LINE FOR CORNER CUT exotic trees (including the roots) over 8m in OFFS, HILLSBOROUGH ROAD AND height or with a girth (measured at 1.4m above QUONA AVENUE the ground) greater than 800mm. Development to be in accordance with the following - In the case of a tree with multiple trunks (such as pohutukawa) the girth measurement shall be the 1. That the term for implementation of this designation aggregate or collective measurement of all trunks be 12 years from the inclusion of the designation in which have a circumference of 250mm or more. the District Plan, in accordance with Section 184 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Provided that regular minor trimming or maintenance effected by hand operated secateurs or pruning 2. Unless lapsed prior to 15 June 2010, the expiry date shears, may be undertaken in accordance with of this designation was extended to 1 November accepted arboricultural practice, and that removal or 2015, by S78 of the Local Government (Auckland trimming required to safeguard life and property is Transitional Provisions) Act 2010. permitted without an outline plan. See also Diagram H06-03 2. No works shall be carried out within the dripline of the following trees other than in accordance with an outline plan submitted and processed in terms of H07-01 TOWER LOCATION, RICHARDSON Section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991: ROAD indigenous trees (including the roots) over 6m in Electrical works are a permitted activity provided that - height or with a girth (measured at 1.4m above the ground) greater than 600mm; 1.
    [Show full text]