DOCSLIB.ORG

Fy 2018 Annual Results Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fy 2018 Annual Results Report ` United States Agency for International Development Bureau of Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Office of Food for Peace FY 2018 ANNUAL RESULTS REPORT Awardee Name and Host Country World Vision, Inc.; Ethiopia Award Number AID-FFP-A-16-00008 Activity Name Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) Activity Start Date 30 September 2016 Activity End Date 29 September 2021 Submission Date 11/05/2018 Reporting Fiscal Year FY 2018 Awardee HQ Contact Name Buck Bradshaw Awardee HQ Contact Address 300 I St NE, Washington, DC 20002 Awardee HQ Contact Telephone Number +1 202 572 6594 Awardee HQ Contact Email Address [email protected] Host Country Office Contact Name Michael Mulford Host Country Office Contact Telephone +251 966269961 Number Host Country Office Contact Email Address [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Interventions and Results ................................................................................................................................ 4 Purpose 1: Increased income, productive assets, and equitable access to nutritious food for vulnerable women, men, and youth ......................................................................................................... 4 Subpurpose 1.1: Increased agricultural productivity of nutritious foods for women, men, and youth small-holder farmers ........................................................................................................... 4 Subpurpose 1.2: Increased access to agricultural markets for women, men, and youth small-holder farmers ............................................................................................................................... 6 Subpurpose 1.3: Increased access to off-farm and non-farm income opportunities for vulnerable women, men, and youth .................................................................................................... 7 Purpose 2: Improved nutritional status of children under 2 years of age, PLW, and adolescent girls .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Subpurpose 2.1: Increased utilization of nutritious food for children under 2, PLW, and adolescent girls ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Subpurpose 2.2: Increased utilization of health and nutrition services .................................... 11 Subpurpose 2.3: Reduced prevalence of diarrhea and water-borne diseases ......................... 12 Purpose 3: Increased women’s and youth empowerment and gender equity ............................ 13 Subpurpose 3.1: Institutions are responsive to the needs and priorities of women and youth ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 Subpurpose 3.2: Reduction of workload on women and girls ................................................... 15 Subpurpose 3.3: Strengthened aspirations, capabilities, leadership, and decision-making power for women and youth ............................................................................................................. 15 Purpose 4: Strengthened ability of women, men, and communities to mitigate, adapt to, and recover from human-caused and natural shocks and stresses ....................................................... 16 Subpurpose 4.1: Improved natural resource management by women, men, youth, and communities ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Subpurpose 4.2: Improved disaster risk reduction strategies for women, men, and communities ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Subpurpose 4.3: Improved effectiveness and social mobilization of PSNP4 institutions ...... 19 Environmental Risks and Opportunities ................................................................................................... 21 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 22 Internal and External Coordination ........................................................................................................... 22 Commodity Management ............................................................................................................................. 24 Direct Participating HH by Sector ............................................................................................................. 26 Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) AID-FFP-A-16-00008 November 26, 2018 2 Challenges, Successes, and Lessons Learned ........................................................................................... 26 Annex 1 Update on the Learning Agenda ................................................................................................ 29 Annex 2 Update on the SNNPR Sidama Pilot ......................................................................................... 31 Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) AID-FFP-A-16-00008 November 26, 2018 3 Executive Summary The Strengthen PSNP4 Institutional and Resilience [SPIR] program implemented by World Vision and its partners (CARE and ORDA) aims to enhance livelihoods, increase resilience against shocks, and improve food security and nutrition for rural households that are vulnerable to food insecurity in Ethiopia, particularly in Wadla, Sekota, Lasta, Gazo, Gaz Gibla, Dahena, Bugna, Meket, and Tsagelji woredas of Amhara region, Kurfa Chelle, Girawa, Chiro, Gemachis, Daro Lebu, and Siraro woredas of Oromia and Wondo Genet and Malga woredas of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region. The social unrest in the project’s implementation area, especially in Kurfa Chelle, Girawa, Chiro, Gemechis, Siraro, and Daro Lebu woredas, has affected the timely implementation of the project’s activities, causing a loss of 1,761 days in the timeline. In addition, communication has also been challenged by the government’s shutdown of the internet. Despite extra efforts, including working on weekends and extra hours, this loss has affected achievement of both the target goals and related resource utilization during this reporting period. Interventions and Results Purpose 1: Increased income, productive assets, and equitable access to nutritious food for vulnerable women, men, and youth Subpurpose 1.1: Increased agricultural productivity of nutritious foods for women, men, and youth small-holder farmers Intermediate Outcome 1.1.1: Increased livestock productivity and diversity The production of adequate quantities of good quality, dry season forage that can supplement crop residues and pasture roughages is considered essential in overcoming dry season constraints that affect livestock production. Moreover, the integration of livestock and cropping systems is important for sustainable natural resource management and improved livestock productivity. In this quarter, SPIR provided Training of Trainer (ToT) trainings focused on animal feeding, such as feed constraints, feed resources, forage production, forage utilization, grazing strategies during a drought, and shoat fattening to 297 (48 female) development agents (DA), community facilitators, and Woreda livestock experts participants in the Amhara and Oromia regions at two levels. This training was further provided for 2,648 (1,445 female) project participants. Subsequently, 2,339 (1,280 female) project participants received 7.7 MT of forage seed (eg. Cow pea, pigeon pea, lab and vetch), out of which 1,192 (919 female) received 6,710 split forage seedlings, elephant grass, Desho grass, and Leucaena leucocephala). Most of the farmers began production of the forage in their backyard, in some cases intercropping with other crops that will be ready to feed their livestock in the upcoming 4 months. With the objective of enhancing mother and child nutritional status in PLW households, SPIR provided 14,970 Bovan Brown and Sasso breed pullets (3-month-old chickens) and 33,685 kg poultry feed on a cost-share basis for 2,495 program participant households (2,396 female- headed household). Each participant contributed 360 (25% of the cost) Ethiopian birr (ETB) as a cost share into their VESA to serve as a rotation lending fund for other members. The pullets Strengthen PSNP4 Institutions and Resilience (SPIR) AID-FFP-A-16-00008 November 26, 2018 4 have grown and started benefiting those targeted project participants by providing eggs for household consumption and improving household nutrition, as well as helping with income generation. Within this reporting period, out of 13,434 hens that started laying, 523,715 eggs were laid, of which 232,813 (44%) were consumed, and 290,674 were sold. Eggs were sold on average for 2.88 ETB, earning the participants a total of $30,441 (837,141 ETB). Of the total distributed pullets, 1,053 (7%) died due to a New Castle disease outbreak, and predators. SPIR facilitated a vaccination campaign in project kebeles where the problem was occurring. Compared with the high mortality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Smallholder Farmers at Guba Lafto Woreda, Amhara National Region State, Ethiopia
    VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION PRACTICES TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THE CASE OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS AT GUBA LAFTO WOREDA, AMHARA NATIONAL REGION STATE, ETHIOPIA M.Sc. THESIS TSEGAYE TEMESGEN WONDO GENET COLLEGE OF FORESTRY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, HAWASSA UNIVERSITY, ETHIOPIA JUNE, 2018 VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION PRACTICES TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THE CASE OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS AT GUBA LAFTO WOREDA, AMHARA NATIONAL REGION STATE, ETHIOPIA TSEGAYE TEMESGEN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE ASSESMENT, WONDO GENET COLLEGE OF FORESTRY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES WONDO GENET COLLEGE OF FORESTRY AND NATURAL RESOURCES WONDO GENET, ETHIOPIA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT (SPECIALIZATION: CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE ASSESMENT) JUNE, 2018 II Approval sheet1 This is to certify that the thesis entitled “vulnerability and adaptation practices to climate change: the case of smallholder farmers at Guba Lafto woreda, Amhara national region state, Ethiopia” is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Sciences with specialization in climate smart agricultural landscape assessment. It is a record of original research carried out by Tsegaye Temesgen Id. No Msc/CSAL/R0012/09, under my supervision; and no part of the thesis has been submitted for any other degree or diploma. The assistance and help received during the courses of this investigation have been duly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany, Diverse Food Uses, Claimed Health Benefits And
    Shewayrga and Sopade Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2011, 7:19 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/7/1/19 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Ethnobotany, diverse food uses, claimed health benefits and implications on conservation of barley landraces in North Eastern Ethiopia highlands Hailemichael Shewayrga1* and Peter A Sopade2,3 Abstract Background: Barley is the number one food crop in the highland parts of North Eastern Ethiopia produced by subsistence farmers grown as landraces. Information on the ethnobotany, food utilization and maintenance of barley landraces is valuable to design and plan germplasm conservation strategies as well as to improve food utilization of barley. Methods: A study, involving field visits and household interviews, was conducted in three administrative zones. Eleven districts from the three zones, five kebeles in each district and five households from each kebele were visited to gather information on the ethnobotany, the utilization of barley and how barley end-uses influence the maintenance of landrace diversity. Results: According to farmers, barley is the “king of crops” and it is put for diverse uses with more than 20 types of barley dishes and beverages reportedly prepared in the study area. The products are prepared from either boiled/roasted whole grain, raw- and roasted-milled grain, or cracked grain as main, side, ceremonial, and recuperating dishes. The various barley traditional foods have perceived qualities and health benefits by the farmers. Fifteen diverse barley landraces were reported by farmers, and the ethnobotany of the landraces reflects key quantitative and qualitative traits. Some landraces that are preferred for their culinary qualities are being marginalized due to moisture shortage and soil degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 and Reassessment of Crop
    Ethiopia Bellmon Analysis 2015/16 And Reassessment Of Crop Production and Marketing For 2014/15 October 2015 Final Report Ethiopia: Bellmon Analysis - 2014/15 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Economic Background ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Wage Labor ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Agriculture Sector Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Barley Production in Meket District, Ethiopia
    Vol. 10(10), pp. 328-338, October 2018 DOI: 10.5897/JDAE2018.0960 Article Number: 12FCF3758529 ISSN: 2006-9774 Copyright ©2018 Journal of Development and Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE Economics Full Length Research Paper Economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in Meket district, Ethiopia Getachew Wollie1*, Lemma Zemedu2 and Bosena Tegegn2 1Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Samara University, Ethiopia. 2Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Received 10 May, 2018; Accepted 31 July, 2018 This study analyzed the economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in the case of Meket district, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. A cross sectional data collected from a sample of 123 barley producers during the 2015/2016 production season was used for the analysis. Two stages random sampling method was used to select sample respondents. The translog functional form was chosen to estimate both production and cost functions and OLS estimation method was applied to identify allocative and economic inefficiencies factors, while technical inefficiency factors were analyzed by using single stage estimation approach. The estimated stochastic production frontier model indicated input variables such as fertilizer, human labor and oxen power as significant variables that increase the quantity of barley output, while barley seed had a negative effect. The estimated mean levels of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of the sample farmers were about 70.9, 68.6 and 48.8%, respectively which revealed the presence of a room to increase their technical, allocative and economic efficiencies level on average by 29.1, 31.4 and 51.2%, respectively with the existing resources.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook Update November 2011
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook Update November 2011 Good rains likely to stabilize food security in the south The October to December Deyr rains are performing well Figure 1. Most-likely food security outcomes (October in most parts of the southern and southeastern pastoral to December 2011) and agropastoral areas, easing the shortage of pastoral resources. This, coupled with ongoing humanitarian assistance, will continue to stabilize food security among poor and very poor households in these areas. Nonetheless, about 4 million people will continue to require humanitarian assistance through the end of 2011 across the country. Prices of staple foods have generally started declining following the fresh Meher harvest, although they remain higher than the five‐year average. This will continue to constrain access to food over the coming months among the rural and urban poor who heavily depend on purchase to fulfill their minimum food requirements. For more information on FEWS NET’s Food Insecurity Severity Scale, During the January to March 2012 period, Crisis level food please see: www.fews.net/FoodInsecurityScale insecurity will extend to the dominantly Belg producing Source: FEWS NET Ethiopia and WFP zones in the northeastern highlands as well as into some marginal Meher cropping areas due to the below normal Figure 2. Most‐likely food security outcomes (January to 2011 harvests. Similarly, as the long dry season March 2012) (December to March) progresses, deterioration in food security is likely in some southern pastoral and agropastoral woredas which were severely affected by the recent drought. Updated food security outlook through March 2012 Food security in most parts of the country has stabilized as a result of improved market supply and declining prices following the Meher harvest, ongoing humanitarian assistance, and the current good Deyr/Hageya rains in the southern and southeast pastoral and agropastoral.
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • Census Data/Projections, 1999 & 2000
    Census data/Projections, 1999 & 2000 Jan - June and July - December Relief Bens., Supplementary Feeding Bens. TIGRAY Zone 1994 census 1999 beneficiaries - May '99 2000 beneficiaries - Jan 2000 July - Dec 2000 Bens Zone ID/prior Wereda Total Pop. 1999 Pop. 1999 Bens. 1999 bens % 2000 Pop. 2000 Bens 2000 bens Bens. Sup. July - Dec Bens July - Dec Bens ity Estimate of Pop. Estimate % of Pop. Feeding % of pop 1 ASEGEDE TSIMBELA 96,115 111,424 114,766 1 KAFTA HUMERA 48,690 56,445 58,138 1 LAELAY ADIYABO 79,832 92,547 5,590 6% 95,324 7,800 8% 11,300 12% Western 1 MEDEBAY ZANA 97,237 112,724 116,106 2,100 2% 4,180 4% 1 TAHTAY ADIYABO 80,934 93,825 6,420 7% 96,639 18,300 19% 24,047 25% 1 TAHTAY KORARO 83,492 96,790 99,694 2,800 3% 2,800 3% 1 TSEGEDE 59,846 69,378 71,459 1 TSILEMTI 97,630 113,180 37,990 34% 116,575 43,000 37% 15,050 46,074 40% 1 WELKAIT 90,186 104,550 107,687 Sub Total 733,962 850,863 50,000 6% 876,389 74,000 8% 15,050 88,401 10% *2 ABERGELE 58,373 67,670 11,480 17% 69,700 52,200 75% 18,270 67,430 97% *2 ADWA 109,203 126,596 9,940 8% 130,394 39,600 30% 13,860 58,600 45% 2 DEGUA TEMBEN 89,037 103,218 7,360 7% 106,315 34,000 32% 11,900 44,000 41% Central 2 ENTICHO 131,168 152,060 22,850 15% 156,621 82,300 53% 28,805 92,300 59% 2 KOLA TEMBEN 113,712 131,823 12,040 9% 135,778 62,700 46% 21,945 67,700 50% 2 LAELAY MAYCHEW 90,123 104,477 3,840 4% 107,612 19,600 18% 6,860 22,941 21% 2 MEREB LEHE 78,094 90,532 14,900 16% 93,248 57,500 62% 20,125 75,158 81% *2 NAEDER ADET 84,942 98,471 15,000 15% 101,425 40,800 40% 14,280 62,803 62% 2
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire
    Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire Always 001a. Your name: [NAME] Is this your name? ◯ Yes ◯ No 001b. Enter your name below. 001a = 0 Please record your name 002a = 0 Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ TIGRAY ◯ AFAR ◯ AMHARA ◯ OROMIYA ◯ SOMALIE BENISHANGUL GUMZ 003a. Region ◯ ◯ S.N.N.P ◯ GAMBELA ◯ HARARI ◯ ADDIS ABABA ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${this_country} ◯ NORTH WEST TIGRAY ◯ CENTRAL TIGRAY ◯ EASTERN TIGRAY ◯ SOUTHERN TIGRAY ◯ WESTERN TIGRAY ◯ MEKELE TOWN SPECIAL ◯ ZONE 1 ◯ ZONE 2 ◯ ZONE 3 ZONE 5 003b. Zone ◯ ◯ NORTH GONDAR ◯ SOUTH GONDAR ◯ NORTH WELLO ◯ SOUTH WELLO ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST GOJAM ◯ WEST GOJAM ◯ WAG HIMRA ◯ AWI ◯ OROMIYA 1 ◯ BAHIR DAR SPECIAL ◯ WEST WELLEGA ◯ EAST WELLEGA ◯ ILU ABA BORA ◯ JIMMA ◯ WEST SHEWA ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST SHEWA ◯ ARSI ◯ WEST HARARGE ◯ EAST HARARGE ◯ BALE ◯ SOUTH WEST SHEWA ◯ GUJI ◯ ADAMA SPECIAL ◯ WEST ARSI ◯ KELEM WELLEGA ◯ HORO GUDRU WELLEGA ◯ Shinile ◯ Jijiga ◯ Liben ◯ METEKEL ◯ ASOSA ◯ PAWE SPECIAL ◯ GURAGE ◯ HADIYA ◯ KEMBATA TIBARO ◯ SIDAMA ◯ GEDEO ◯ WOLAYITA ◯ SOUTH OMO ◯ SHEKA ◯ KEFA ◯ GAMO GOFA ◯ BENCH MAJI ◯ AMARO SPECIAL ◯ DAWURO ◯ SILTIE ◯ ALABA SPECIAL ◯ HAWASSA CITY ADMINISTRATION ◯ AGNEWAK ◯ MEJENGER ◯ HARARI ◯ AKAKI KALITY ◯ NEFAS SILK-LAFTO ◯ KOLFE KERANIYO 2 ◯ GULELE ◯ LIDETA ◯ KIRKOS-SUB CITY ◯ ARADA ◯ ADDIS KETEMA ◯ YEKA ◯ BOLE ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${level1} ◯ TAHTAY ADIYABO ◯ MEDEBAY ZANA ◯ TSELEMTI ◯ SHIRE ENIDASILASE/TOWN/ ◯ AHIFEROM ◯ ADWA ◯ TAHTAY MAYCHEW ◯ NADER ADET ◯ DEGUA TEMBEN ◯ ABIYI ADI/TOWN/ ◯ ADWA/TOWN/ ◯ AXUM/TOWN/ ◯ SAESI TSADAMBA ◯ KLITE
    [Show full text]
  • F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component
    F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Project Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Table of Contents Page Agricultral Promotion Component ....................................................................................................... F-4-1 Natural Resource Management Component ........................................................................................ F-4-23 Livelihood Improvement Component .................................................................................................. F-4-31 F-4-i Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Activity Sheet for JALIMPS Verification Project Agricultural Promotion Component 1: 1. Activity Demonstration/Verification Plot: Primary Crops (15 activities in total) Name 2. Site Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo, Mekedela, Legambo, Aregoba - 2009 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Mekedela, Kobo - 2009/10 belg season: Gidan, Mekedela, Legambo - 2010 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo 3. Objectives Demonstration/verification of integrated approaches for the improvement of productivity of primary crops & farm land conservation in the watershed. 4. Implementer CRGs under the guidance & supervision of DAs & WAO 5. Beneficiaries CRGs: 34 CRGs formed 34 CRGs x 5 members = 170 members (beneficiaries) 6. Activity Establishment of demonstration/verification plot(s) for the integrated approaches Description for the productivity improvement
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Amhara Region Administrative Map (As of 05 Jan 2015)
    Ethiopia: Amhara region administrative map (as of 05 Jan 2015) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abrha jara ! Tselemt !Adi Arikay Town ! Addi Arekay ! Zarima Town !Kerakr ! ! T!IGRAY Tsegede ! ! Mirab Armacho Beyeda ! Debark ! Debarq Town ! Dil Yibza Town ! ! Weken Town Abergele Tach Armacho ! Sanja Town Mekane Berhan Town ! Dabat DabatTown ! Metema Town ! Janamora ! Masero Denb Town ! Sahla ! Kokit Town Gedebge Town SUDAN ! ! Wegera ! Genda Wuha Town Ziquala ! Amba Giorges Town Tsitsika Town ! ! ! ! Metema Lay ArmachoTikil Dingay Town ! Wag Himra North Gonder ! Sekota Sekota ! Shinfa Tomn Negade Bahr ! ! Gondar Chilga Aukel Ketema ! ! Ayimba Town East Belesa Seraba ! Hamusit ! ! West Belesa ! ! ARIBAYA TOWN Gonder Zuria ! Koladiba Town AMED WERK TOWN ! Dehana ! Dagoma ! Dembia Maksegnit ! Gwehala ! ! Chuahit Town ! ! ! Salya Town Gaz Gibla ! Infranz Gorgora Town ! ! Quara Gelegu Town Takusa Dalga Town ! ! Ebenat Kobo Town Adis Zemen Town Bugna ! ! ! Ambo Meda TownEbinat ! ! Yafiga Town Kobo ! Gidan Libo Kemkem ! Esey Debr Lake Tana Lalibela Town Gomenge ! Lasta ! Muja Town Robit ! ! ! Dengel Ber Gobye Town Shahura ! ! ! Wereta Town Kulmesk Town Alfa ! Amedber Town ! ! KUNIZILA TOWN ! Debre Tabor North Wollo ! Hara Town Fogera Lay Gayint Weldiya ! Farta ! Gasay! Town Meket ! Hamusit Ketrma ! ! Filahit Town Guba Lafto ! AFAR South Gonder Sal!i Town Nefas mewicha Town ! ! Fendiqa Town Zege Town Anibesema Jawi ! ! ! MersaTown Semen Achefer ! Arib Gebeya YISMALA TOWN ! Este Town Arb Gegeya Town Kon Town ! ! ! ! Wegel tena Town Habru ! Fendka Town Dera
    [Show full text]