DOCSLIB.ORG

Moses and the Exodus: What Evidence?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moses and the Exodus: What Evidence? Moses and the Exodus: what evidence? Abstract. To be or not to be is a crucial question regarding Moses as well as the Exodus because, according to the Bible, the character related to that famous event forms the basis of the Passover which meant the Promised Land for Jews and later the Paradise for Christians. However, according to most Egyptologists, there is absolutely no evidence of Moses and the Exodus in Egyptian documents, which leads them to conclude that the whole biblical story is a myth written for gullible people. Ironically, if one considers that “truth” must be based on two pillars: an accurate chronology anchored on absolute dates (Herodotus’ principle) and reliable documents coming from critical editions (Thucydides’ principle), that implies an amazing conclusion: those who believe Egyptologists are actually the real gullible ones. According to Egyptian accounts the last king of the XVth dynasty, named Apopi, “very pretty” in Hebrew that is Moses’ birth name (Ex 2:2), reigned 40 years in Egypt from 1613 to 1573 BCE, then 40 years later he met Seqenenre Taa the last pharaoh of the XVIIth dynasty and gave him an unspecified disturbing message. The eldest son of Seqenenre Taa, Ahmose Sapaïr, who was crown prince died in a dramatic and unexplained way shortly before his father. Seqenenre Taa died in May 1533 BCE, after 11 years of reign, in dramatic and unclear circumstances. The state of his mummy proves, however, that his body received severe injuries, in agreement with Psalms 136:15, and remained abandoned for several days before being mummified. Prince Kamose, Seqenenre Taa's brother, assured interim of authority for 3 years and threatened attack the former pharaoh Apopi, new prince of Retenu (Palestine) who took the name Moses, according to Manetho (280 BCE), an Egyptian priest and historian. In the stele of the Tempest, Kamose also blames Apopi for all the disasters that come to fall upon Egypt, which caused many deaths. Before answering the question “what evidence of Moses’ existence”, it is necessary to define what is evidence. For example “did Jesus exist?” because most testimonies come from the New Testament, a religious book. Some atheists refuse to take into account the Bible because that book states clearly the existence of God as well as miracles. However, in my opinion, searching the truth must be the fundamental purpose of any honest historian. “What is truth” Pilate said to Jesus (Jn 18:38). For honest and scientific historians, “truth” is based on two main pillars: 1) an accurate chronology anchored on absolute dates (Herodotus’ principle) and 2) reliable documents coming from critical editions (Thucydides’ principle). If we apply these two principles, Jesus existed because he died on Friday 3 April 33 CE around 3 hours before a moon eclipse (Ac 2:20) and the Jews who put him to death have never denied even his claim to be the Messiah (BT Sanhedrin 43a). The existence of Moses, and consequently the Exodus, began to be challenged when Egyptologists began publishing articles, mainly from 19801, to prove that the text of the Old Testament should be considered without historical value. It is to be noted that the more these academics are close to political power (which is today in France proudly atheist) the more their attacks (in French) against the Bible are virulent and ideological: Ø It is absurd on the one hand, taking the biblical text for a historical document, on the other hand reversing the importance of protagonists: Israel is mentioned only once on a stele of Merneptah while the word Egypt is used 680 times in the Bible (...) The references to Egypt in the Bible are mainly used to feed the internal history of the Hebrews, giving a vague backdrop for some episodes, and are unrelated with current history teaching2. Christiane Desroches Noblecourt (1913-2011), was an Egyptologist, Emeritus Chief Curator of Egyptian Antiquities (Louvre) and former professor of archaeology at the Ecole du Louvre. 1 J.K. HOFFMEIER – Israel in Egypt. The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition New York 1996 Ed. Oxford University Press pp. 3-5. 2 C. DESROCHES NOBLECOURT - Symboles de l'Égypte Paris 2004 Éd. Desclée de Brouwer pp. 125-126. 2 SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO AN ABSOLUTE CHRONOLOGY THROUGH SYNCHRONISMS DATED BY ASTRONOMY Ø As the history of unclean ones is devoid of any historical basis it is difficult to agree with Manetho and Josephus that the forcibly expelling from Avaris by Pharaoh and his congeners is the same event as the liberation of the Hebrews taken out by Moses with God's help ... The gross invention of Egyptian scribes, worthy of the trashcan, can not remain in the folder of historians of Bible times (...) The apologetical travesty imagined by Josephus is not better than the libelous travesty of the Egyptian priest3. Jean Yoyotte (1927-2009) was an Egyptologist, Chairholder of Egyptology at the Collège de France and director of studies at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes. Ø In general, no serious archaeologist believes today that the events described in the Book of Joshua have any accurate historical basis. Archaeological surveys in the early 1990s, in particular, showed that the Israelite culture emerged in the central hills of the country, in continuity with the Canaanite culture of the previous period4. Pierre de Miroschedji, archaeologist, director of research at CNRS. Ø The departure from Egypt, known as the Exodus, is an essential vicissitude of this story [Exodus 13:14] (...) We almost forget one fundamental fact: nothing in the present state of Egyptian literature, more or less contemporary with these events, confirms this story, or even alluded, only fleetingly, to one of the episodes where some characters are mentioned. Nothing!5 Alain Zivie, Egyptologist, Director of Research at Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Ø Most historians take the biblical text of the conquest of Canaan for a pious legend, a reinterpretation of ideological and theological origins of Israel (...) These cities are, according to the Bible, heavily fortified. But archaeological excavations reveal otherwise. So today, excavations of Canaanite cities and reading of tablets from Tell el-Amarna showed that the victories of Joshua took place only on paper. To conclude: “There has been no mass exodus from Egypt. Canaan was not conquered by violence6.” Richard Lebeau, Egyptologist, historian of religions in the ancient Near East. Ø Modern archaeology has shown that the concept of archives kept in Jerusalem with writings of the tenth century, is an absurdity based on a biblical witness and not on factual evidence. Bible stories would rank therefore among national mythologies, and would have no more historical foundation than the Homeric saga of Ulysses, or that of Aeneas, founder of Rome, sung by Virgil7. Israel Finkelstein, Israeli archaeologist, Director of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University, author of the famous book The Bible Unearthed. Ø How should ultimately consider the source that is the biblical text to serve as a gateway for talking about people of the Bible? (...) There are so many layers of myths, they should not be taken for historical narratives. The Exodus, episode presented in college history books as a real historic event, provides a good illustration. According to the Bible (...) this is the long journey of the Hebrews from Egypt and Canaan which is called the Exodus. However, it is highly unlikely that such an event ever took place. The first reason to doubt results from the considerable chronological gap between the time of writing from books that mention it and the supposed date of the event, clearly located in a mythical past. The second reason is the absence of any explicit data in the biblical text to place Exodus in time and to follow it in space, so the name of the Pharaoh is not given. The third reason is the silence of the Egyptian sources. A final argument is the absence of any reference to the Exodus in the oldest strata of the Bible8. 3 J. YOYOTTE – En Égypte, le faux mystère des dynasties hyksos in: Le monde de la Bible n°146 (novembre 2002) pp. 44-45. 4 P. DE MIROSCHEDJI – Les archéologues réécrivent la Bible in: La Recherche n°391 (novembre 2005) p. 32. 5 A. ZIVIE – Les Hébreux en Egypte: réalités et fantasmes in: Historia n°698 (février 2005) p. 59. 6 R. LEBEAU – La Terre promise était acquise in: Historia n°698 (février 2005) pp. 64, 65. R. LEBEAU – L'Exode une fiction théologique in: Histoire Antique n°41 (février 2009) p. 79. 7 I. FINKELSTEIN – Le grand roi? Rien qu'un potentat local in: Historia n°698 (février 2005) p. 73. I. FINKELSTEIN, N.A. SILBERMAN - La Bible dévoilée Paris 2002 Éd. Bayard pp. 51-53. 8 C. ROBIN – Les peuples de la Bible quelle(s) lecture(s) ? in: Les Cahiers de Science&Vie n°89 (octobre 2005) pp. 6-8. MOSES AND THE EXODUS: WHAT EVIDENCE? 3 Christian Robin, Director of the Laboratory of ancient Semitic Studies (Collège de France Paris IV Sorbonne), member of the Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. Ø The biblical writers and editors had some genuine sources, but they did not hesitate to manipulate them. They did this not only with exaggerations and embellishments, but also with additions and even outright inventions, in order to make the stories serve their own ideological agenda. In this regard, they were like most ancient historians. Nevertheless, they still need not be regarded as charlatans, even though their view of history was naive. They, too, thought that they were telling the operative truth — that is, they were simply writing well-intentioned propaganda.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canaan Or Gaza?
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections Pa-Canaan in the Egyptian New Kingdom: Canaan or Gaza? Michael G. Hasel Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University A&564%'6 e identification of the geographical name “Canaan” continues to be widely debated in the scholarly literature. Cuneiform sources om Mari, Amarna, Ugarit, Aššur, and Hattusha have been discussed, as have Egyptian sources. Renewed excavations in North Sinai along the “Ways of Horus” have, along with recent scholarly reconstructions, refocused attention on the toponyms leading toward and culminating in the arrival to Canaan. is has led to two interpretations of the Egyptian name Pa-Canaan: it is either identified as the territory of Canaan or the city of Gaza. is article offers a renewed analysis of the terms Canaan, Pa-Canaan, and Canaanite in key documents of the New Kingdom, with limited attention to parallels of other geographical names, including Kharu, Retenu, and Djahy. It is suggested that the name Pa-Canaan in Egyptian New Kingdom sources consistently refers to the larger geographical territory occupied by the Egyptians in Asia. y the 1960s, a general consensus had emerged regarding of Canaan varied: that it was a territory in Asia, that its bound - the extent of the land of Canaan, its boundaries and aries were fluid, and that it also referred to Gaza itself. 11 He Bgeographical area. 1 The primary sources for the recon - concludes, “No wonder that Lemche’s review of the evidence struction of this area include: (1) the Mari letters, (2) the uncovered so many difficulties and finally led him to conclude Amarna letters, (3) Ugaritic texts, (4) texts from Aššur and that Canaan was a vague term.” 12 Hattusha, and (5) Egyptian texts and reliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyksos, Egipcios, Nubios: Algunas Consideraciones Sobre El I1 Pe~Odointermedio Y La Convivencia Entre Los Distintos Grupos Etnicos
    HYKSOS, EGIPCIOS, NUBIOS: ALGUNAS CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE EL I1 PE~ODOINTERMEDIO Y LA CONVIVENCIA ENTRE LOS DISTINTOS GRUPOS ETNICOS Inmaculada Vivas SBinz Universidad de AlcalB de Henares ABSTRACT This article reviews some questions of the political and social history of the the Second Intermediate Period. The first part is based on recent discussion about the terminology related to the period, and the convenience or unconvenience of using certain terms in future investigations. The second part concerns the relationships among the dlflerent ethnic groups living in Egypt at that time, and the process of acculturation of the Hyksos in Egypt. An interesting hypotheses about king Nehesy is analysed, which proposes the existence of a dynastic marriage between a Nubian queen and a king of the XIVth Dynasty, both being the suppoused parents of Nehesy. I reject this hypotheses on the basis of archaedogical and epigraphical sources. The true origin of Nehesy remains a moot point, being still d~ficultto explain why this king had a name meaning "the Nubian". -Los estudios sobre el I1 Periodo Intermedio egipcio se remontan a1 siglo pasado', pero es desde hace apenas unas dCcadas cuando se ha sentido la necesidad de definir ese tCrmino. Los primeros trabajos sobre el tema eran breves anilisis sobre el final del Reino Medio y la llegada de 10s hyksos, sobre Cstos y su relaci6n con Israel, o la posible ubicaci6n de Avaris y el proceso de expulsi6n de 10s hyksos. Todos estos estudios son importantes para nuestras investigaciones pero muchas veces se basan s610 en fuentes arqueol6gicas procedentes de Siria-Palestina de las cuales se extrapolaban datos para la situaci6n de Egipto.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stele of Merneptah—Assessment of the Final 'Israel' Strophe and Its
    VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 27(1) 2013 The Stele of Merneptah—assessment of the final ‘Israel’ strophe and its implications for chronology Patrick Clarke The text of the final poetic strophe of the famous stele of the pharaoh Merneptah (item JE 31408, the Cairo Museum) appears to mention Israel. With few exceptions, the majority of archeologists date this text and Merneptah’s reign to the 1200s bc in the Conventional Egyptian Chronology. This would place both this pharaoh and his stele in the biblical time of the Judges. An analysis of this Egyptian text indicates that Merneptah’s reign should instead be dated to 913–903 bc; a movement of three centuries. Furthermore, the stele offers tantalizing clues to the identity of the biblical Shishak. All this has huge ramifications for biblical chronology, bringing us closer to a satisfying correlation of established secular history with the inerrant biblical timeline. he black granite ‘Victory Stele’ of Merneptah was world-famous 28-line ‘Victory Stele’ discussed here, from Tdiscovered by W.F. Petrie in 1896. This stele (3.18 m his mortuary temple on the West Bank at modern Luxor. All high x 1.63 m wide) is the only known Egyptian document refer to military campaigns. generally accepted as mentioning ysry3l—Israel. The text Like his post-Amarna predecessors, Merneptah faced itself is dated by most analysts as c. 1209/1208 BC in the political/military issues in the Egyptian sphere of influence Conventional Egyptian Chronology (CEC). Merneptah’s during his reign. This included crushing a revolt in northern reign itself is assigned to the period 1213–1203 BC, which Reṯenu.1 In his regnal year four, there were problems on would place both this pharaoh and his stele in the biblical Egypt’s western borders which involved the Libyans.2 By time of the Judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Index
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11336-7 — The Ancient Egyptian Economy Brian Muhs Index More Information SOURCE INDEX Note : An n following a page number indicates a note. Archives Book 15, 29.1–2, 207 Archive of Amennakhte, 112 Book 15, 92.2, 196 Archive of Amenothes, 248 Book 17, 52.6, 236 Archive of Ananiah, 192 , 193 , 204 Herodotus Archive of Djekhy and Ituredj, 202 , 205 , Book II, 30, 196 , 197 , 208 208 – 209 Book II, 154, 197 Archive of gooseherds of Hou, 192 , 193 , 205 Book II, 157, 206 Archive of Horemsaef, 82 – 83 Book II, 158, 317 Archive of Inena, 105 , 116 Book II, 159, 195 Archive of Menches, 245 Book II, 161, 195 Archive of Mesi, 100 , 112 , 128 – 129 , 130 Book II, 161–162, 313n 167 Archive of Mibtahiah, 204 Book II, 161–163, 169 Archive of Milon, 199 , 226 , 243 Book II, 163, 197 Archive of Pefheryhesy, 200 – 201 , 203 Book II, 164–166, 197 – 198 Archive of Petiese, 204 – 205 Book II, 168, 198 , 313 n 167 Archive of Petubast, 147 – 148 , 161 , 169 Book II, 169, 197 Archive of Totoes, 248 Book II, 177, 151 – 152 , 184 Archive of Tsenhor, 201 , 203 , 205 Book II, 178, 186 , 208 Archive of Zenon, 226 – 227 , 245 , 247 Book II, 179, 186 , 208 Book II, 182, 195 – 196 Biblical Works Cited Book III, 12, 15, 160, 207 Chronicles Book III, 91, 194 , 197 2 Chronicles 12:1–12, 170 Book IV, 42, 208 2 Chronicles 35:20–25, 206 Book IX, 32, 198 Isaiah 37:9, 170 Book VII, 7, 207 Kings Book VII, 89–99, 196 1 Kings 14:25, 170 Jerome 2 Kings 19:9, 170 Commentariorum in Danielem, 11, 5, 2 Kings 23:29–30, 206 234 , 236 2 Kings 23:31–34,
    [Show full text]
  • Ahmose, Son of Ebana: the Expulsion of the Hyksos
    Ahmose, son of Ebana: The Expulsion of the Hyksos Ahmose, son of Ebana, was an officer in the Egyptian army during the end of the 17th Dynasty to the beginning of the 18th Dynasty (16th century BCE). Originally from Elkab in Upper Egypt, he decided to become a soldier, like his father, Baba, who served under Seqenenre Tao II in the early campaigns against the Hyksos. Ahmose spent most of his military life serving aboard the king’s fleet - fighting at Avaris, at Sharuhen in Palestine, and in Nubia during the service of Ahmose I, and was often cited for his bravery in battle by the king. These accounts were left in a tomb that Ahmose, son of Ebana, identifies as his own at the end of the water—for he was captured on the city side-and he Crew Commander Ahmose son of crossed the water carrying him. When it was Abana, the justified; he says: I speak reported to the royal herald I was rewarded with T to you, all people. I let you know gold once more. Then Avaris was despoiled, and what favors came to me. I have been I brought spoil from there: one man, three rewarded with gold seven times in the sight women; total, four persons. His majesty gave of the whole land, with male and female them to me as slaves. slaves as well. I have been endowed with Then Sharahen was besieged for three years. very many fields. The name of the brave His majesty despoiled it and I brought spoil man is in that which he has done; it will not from it: two women and a hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Noticing Neighbors: Reconsidering Ancient Egyptian Perceptions of Ethnicity
    The American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences Noticing Neighbors: Reconsidering Ancient Egyptian Perceptions of Ethnicity A Thesis Submitted to The Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Egyptology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In Egyptology By Taylor Bryanne Woodcock Under the supervision of Dr. Mariam Ayad May 2014 ABSTRACT Ethnic identities are nuanced, fluid and adaptive. They are a means of categorizing the self and the ‘other’ through the recognition of geographical, cultural, lingual, and physical differences. This work examines recurring associations, epithets and themes in ancient Egyptian texts to reveal how the Egyptians discussed the ethnic uniqueness they perceived of their regional neighbors. It employs Egyptian written records, including temple inscriptions, royal and private correspondence, stelae and tomb autobiographies, and literary tales, from the Old Kingdom to the beginning of the Third Intermediate Period. The textual examples are organized by ethnic group and divided into four regions, beginning with those concerning the western groups and proceeding clockwise, ending with those concerning the southern groups. The analysis of these texts produces an understanding of the Egyptian conceptualization of ethnicity in general, and the conceptualization of distinct ethnic identities specific to the four regions surrounding Egypt. This enhances our understanding of the lexical differences through which the Egyptians distinguished their neighbors from each other. Egyptian written records do not support the belief that the ancient Egyptians only understood their foreign neighbors within the simplistic framework of four broad ‘races.’ Egyptian literature contained a multitude of primary ethnonyms for distinct ethnic groups, as well as a number of secondary, informal ethnonyms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stela of the Viceroy Usersatet (Boston MFA 25.632), His Shrine at Qasr Ibrim, and the Festival of Nubian Tribute Under Amenhotep II
    The Stela of the Viceroy Usersatet (Boston MFA 25.632), his Shrine at Qasr Ibrim, and the Festival of Nubian Tribute under Amenhotep II John Coleman Darnell Yale University N SPITE OF the surviving epigraphic and archaeological evidence concerning the Egyptian administration of Nubia during the New Kingdom, the personal aspects of colonial rule I are at best shadows behind the more prosaic evidence of prosopography and titles, architectural history and burial practices, that force etic analysis to march ahead of emic understanding of Egyptian and Nubian interactions.1 When any archaeological or epigraphic light shines on personal relationships within the administration, at least suggesting, if not revealing, the attitudes of various members of the colonial administration, and hinting at interactions between social strata in Nubia and Egypt, those who would understand Egyptian and Nubian culture may be expected to show interest. The stela of the Viceroy Usersatet from Semna,2 recording Amenhotep II’s personal transcription of his own royal decree to Usersatet, offering advice regarding interactions of Egyptians and Nubians within the viceregal administration, indeed casts some light on the interactions of king, viceroy, and Nubian members of the Egyptian bureaucracy in the south [fig. 1]. The seeming obscurity of the king’s advice, and the lack of transparency regarding the situation about which Amenhotep II offers that advice, have resulted in considerable modern attention to the text, but a certain looseness of interpretation has bedeviled many examinations of the inscription. Defining exactly what the Usersatet stela illuminates has proved to be elusive. Several Egyptological discussions of the inscription have fostered florid descriptions of the personality and character of Amenhotep II, in spite of the remaining uncertainties in properly 1 So S.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Records of Egypt, Volume
    class93% BO~~BVR Library of ~delbertCollege V.3 of Western Rerane Unlvsrsity, Olsvoiand. 0. ANCIENT RECORDS OF EGYPT ANCIENT RECORDS UNDER THE GENERAL EDITORSHIP OF WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER ANCIENT RECORDS OF ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA EDITED BY ROBERT FRANCIS HARPER ANCIENT RECORDS OF EGYPT EDITED BY JAMES HENRY. BREARTED ANCIENT RECORDS OF PALESTINE, PH(EN1CIA AND SYRIA EDITED BY WILLIAM RAINEX HARPEB ANCIENT RECORDS OF EGYPT HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE PERSIAN CONQUEST. COLLECTED EDITED AND TRANSLATED WITH COMMENTARY JAMES HENRY BREASTED, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF EGYPTOLOGY AND ORIENTAL HISTORY IN TIIE UNIVBEWTY OF CHICAGO VOLUME I11 WHE NINETEENTH DYNASTY CHICAGO THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS 1906 LONDON: LUZAC & CO. LEIPZIGI : OTTO HABRASSOWITZ Published May 1906 QLC.%, Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago. Illinois. U. S. A. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I THEDOCUMENTARY SOURCES OF EGYPTIANHISTORY . CHRONOLOGY........... CHRONOLOGICALTABLE ........ THEPALERMO STONE: THE FIRST TO THE FIFTH DYNASTIES I. Predynastic Kings ........ I1. First Dynasty ......... 111. Second Dynasty ........ IV. Third Dynasty ......... V . Fourth Dynasty ........ VI . Fifth Dynasty ......... THETHIRD DYNASTY ........ Reign of Snefru ...s . b ;- .... Sinai Inscriptions ......... Biography of Methen ........ THE FOURTHDYNASTY ........ Reign of Khufu ......... Sinai Inscriptions ......... Inventory Stela ......... Examples of Dedication Inscriptions by Sons . Reign of Khafre ......... Stela of Mertitydtes ........ Will of Prince Nekure. Son of King Khafre ... Testamentary Enactment of an Unknown Official. Establishing the Endowment of His Tomb by the Pyramid of Khafre ........ Reign of Menkure ......... Debhen's Inscription. Recounting King Menkure's Erec- tion of a Tomb for Him ....... TEE RFTHDYNASTY ......... Reign of Userkaf ......... v vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Testamentary Enactment of Nekonekh .... I.
    [Show full text]
  • Turin King List
    Turin King List This article contains Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Egyptian hieroglyphs. The Turin King List, also known as the Turin Royal Canon, is an ancient Egyptian hieratic papyrus thought to date from the reign of Pharaoh Ramesses II, now in the Museo Egizio (Egyptian Museum)[1] in Turin. The papyrus is the most extensive list available of kings compiled by the ancient Egyptians, and is the basis for most chronology before the reign of Ramesses II. 1904 version of attempt to assemble parts of the Turin King list Creation and use The papyrus is believed to date from the reign of Ramesses II, during the middle of the New Kingdom, or the 19th Dynasty. The beginning and ending of the list are now lost; there is no introduction, and the list does not continue after the 19th Dynasty. The composition may thus have occurred at any subsequent time, from the reign of Ramesses II to as late as the 20th Dynasty. The papyrus lists the names of rulers, the lengths of reigns in years, with months and days for some kings. In some cases they are grouped together by family, which corresponds approximately to the dynasties of Manethoʼs book. The list includes the names of ephemeral rulers or those ruling small territories that may be unmentioned in other sources. The list also is believed to contain kings from the 15th Dynasty, the Hyksos who ruled Lower Egypt and the River Nile delta. The Hyksos rulers do not have cartouches (enclosing borders which indicate the name of a king), and a hieroglyphic sign is added to indicate that they were foreigners, although typically on King Lists foreign rulers are not listed.
    [Show full text]
  • EGYPT and the LEVANT Had Apparently Ceased
    - Timothy Kendall - records of their existence are cemeteries of enormous burial mounds, thought to mark CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE their power centres: Ballana, Qustul, Zuma, Tangasi, el-Hobagi and others (Adams I977= 382-429; Lenoble 2004: I8~2, I93-203). Some of these tombs were very rich and belonged to rulers continuing Meroi'tic traditions, but literacy among them EGYPT AND THE LEVANT had apparently ceased. Missionaries from Byzantium and Alexandria converted the region to Christianity in the sixth century AD, and when written records resume, --._.-- the ancient land of Kush had been partitioned into three Christian Nubian (Noba) kingdoms (Anderson 2004: 202-8, 209-37). Manfred Bietak In 2004, construction began on the Merowe High Dam at the Fourth Cataract, about 360 kilometres north of Khartoum. This huge hydroelectric project, scheduled for completion in 2008, will create a lake 125 kilometres long, displace up to 70,000 people, and inundate a huge, remote tract whose settlement history, until now, has been completely unknown. This project has spurred a major international archaeological salvage campaign, reminiscent of that conducted in Egypt during the I960s. When its results are in, the history of Nubia will probably have to be radically rewritten - again (Ahmed 2004). esearch within the last two decades has shown that, from prehistoric times, NOTES R Egypt was not an isolated oasis of the river Nile but had close connections with the Near East. Not only have Natufian arrow tips been found near Helwan in Lower I Recent general reference works include Eide et aJ. 1994-2000; Torok 1997; Wildung I997; Egypt, but at Merimda, in the western delta, the entire lithic production and Morkot 2000; Smith 2003; Edwards 2004; Redford 2004b; Welsby and Anderson 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Ancient Egyptian Perceptions of Ethnicity
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 6-1-2014 Noticing neighbors: reconsidering ancient Egyptian perceptions of ethnicity Taylor Bryanne Woodcock Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Woodcock, T. (2014).Noticing neighbors: reconsidering ancient Egyptian perceptions of ethnicity [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/905 MLA Citation Woodcock, Taylor Bryanne. Noticing neighbors: reconsidering ancient Egyptian perceptions of ethnicity. 2014. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/905 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo School of Humanities and Social Sciences Noticing Neighbors: Reconsidering Ancient Egyptian Perceptions of Ethnicity A Thesis Submitted to The Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Psychology, and Egyptology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts In Egyptology By Taylor Bryanne Woodcock Under the supervision of Dr. Mariam Ayad May 2014 ABSTRACT Ethnic identities are nuanced, fluid and adaptive. They are a means of categorizing the self and the ‘other’ through the recognition of geographical, cultural, lingual, and physical differences. This work examines recurring associations, epithets and themes in ancient Egyptian texts to reveal how the Egyptians discussed the ethnic uniqueness they perceived of their regional neighbors. It employs Egyptian written records, including temple inscriptions, royal and private correspondence, stelae and tomb autobiographies, and literary tales, from the Old Kingdom to the beginning of the Third Intermediate Period.
    [Show full text]