2018 National Plant Biosecurity Status Report Is the 11Th Such Report, with the First Report Being Published in 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 National Plant Biosecurity Status Report Is the 11Th Such Report, with the First Report Being Published in 2008 The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2018 © Plant Health Australia 2019 Disclaimer: This publication is published by Plant Health Australia for information purposes only. Information in the document is drawn from a variety of sources outside Plant Health This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Australia. Although reasonable care was taken in its preparation, Plant Health Australia does permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part not warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness or currency of the information, or its may be reproduced by any process without prior usefulness in achieving any purpose. permission from Plant Health Australia. Given that there are continuous changes in trade patterns, pest distributions, control measures Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights and agricultural practices, this report can only provide a snapshot in time. Therefore, all should be addressed to: information contained in this report has been collected for the 12 month period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018, and should be validated and confirmed with the relevant Communication Manager organisations/authorities before being used. A list of contact details (including websites) is Plant Health Australia provided in the Appendices. 1/1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Plant Health Australia will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred in or arising by reason of any person relying on the ISSN 1838-8116 information in this publication. Readers should make and rely on their own assessment and An electronic version of this report is available for enquiries to verify the accuracy of the information provided. download from the Plant Health Australia website. Print copies can be ordered by contacting Plant Health Australia. In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: National Plant Biosecurity Status Report (2018). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Cover image: Close up of banksia flower in Killcare, NSW The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2018 Contents Foreword 6 Dried fruits (grapes) 84 Forestry 86 INTRODUCTION 9 Ginger 88 The importance of plant biosecurity 10 Grains 90 Growing threats to plant health 11 Hazelnuts 92 Plant biosecurity highlights in 2018 12 Honey bees 94 Lychees 96 CHAPTER 1: AUSTRALIA'S PLANT BIOSECURITY SYSTEM 15 Macadamias 97 Plant biosecurity framework and legislation 18 Mangoes 98 National committees 18 Melons 99 The revised intergovernmental agreement on biosecurity 20 Olives 100 The national plant biosecurity strategy 20 Onions 101 Biosecurity legislation 21 Passionfruit 102 Government roles 22 Pineapples 103 The Australian Government 22 Pistachios 104 State and territory governments 26 Processing tomatoes 105 Non-government roles 32 Production nurseries 106 Plant Health Australia 32 Rice 108 Peak plant industry bodies 34 Rubus 109 Private sector 34 Stone fruit 110 Research funders and providers 35 Strawberries 111 Community 35 Sugarcane 112 Sweetpotatoes 114 CHAPTER 2: PROTECTING AUSTRALIA'S PLANT RESOURCES 37 Table grapes 115 Priority pests and diseases 40 Tea tree 116 National Priority Plant Pests 40 Truffles 117 Environmental biosecurity 42 Vegetables (including potatoes) 118 Plant industry biosecurity preparedness 44 Walnuts 122 Biosecurity planning 44 Wine grapes 123 Contingency planning 54 CHAPTER 4: PRE-BORDER AND BORDER BIOSECURITY 125 Biosecurity manuals for producers 61 Pre-border biosecurity 128 CHAPTER 3: PLANT INDUSTRY PROFILES 63 Obligations under international trade agreements 128 Almonds 66 Pre-border activities to mitigate the risks of imports 129 Apples and pears 68 Regulating imports to manage risk 130 Avocados 70 Other international activities 134 Bananas 72 Ensuring Australian exports meet required standards 134 Blueberries 74 Border biosecurity 142 Canned fruits 75 Collaborations to reduce border biosecurity risks 142 Cherries 76 Government screening, inspection and surveillance activities 144 Chestnuts 78 Protecting our northern coastline 146 Citrus 80 Post-entry plant quarantine 146 Cotton 82 CHAPTER 5: PLANT PEST SURVEILLANCE AND DIAGNOSTICS 149 The biosecurity obligations of all Australians 208 The role of local government 209 Plant pest surveillance 151 Controlling pests through area wide management 209 Oversight of plant pest surveillance 151 On-farm biosecurity 210 Targeted surveillance programs 152 The Farm Biosecurity Program 210 Industry surveillance strategies and programs 153 Biosecurity extension and engagement programs 211 General surveillance programs 156 Managing pests on-farm 214 Plant pest surveillance programs in 2018 158 Australia’s weed biosecurity system 216 Diagnostics – identifying plant pests and diseases 166 Coordination of weed management 216 Coordination of national plant biosecurity diagnostics 166 Preventing the entry of new weeds 216 National diagnostic protocols 168 Eradication and containment of newly established weeds 217 Diagnostic services in Australia 172 Managing established weeds 218 National reference collections 172 Handbook for the Identification of Fruit Flies 178 CHAPTER 8: PLANT BIOSECURITY RD&E 221 Online systems supporting plant biosecurity 179 National Plant Biosecurity RD&E Strategy 223 CHAPTER 6: POST-BORDER BIOSECURITY – ERADICATING NEW Australian Government agencies and statutory authorities 224 PLANT PESTS 181 Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research 224 Australian Research Council 224 Reporting a plant pest or disease 182 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 224 Pest response arrangements 182 Plant Innovation Centre 224 The Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed 183 Research and development corporations 226 Definition of an Emergency Plant Pest 183 Agrifutures Australia 227 Decision making under the EPPRD 183 Cotton Research and Development Corporation 227 PLANTPLAN 184 Forest and Wood Products Australia 227 Categorisation of pests 184 Grains Research and Development Corporation 227 Transition to Management 185 Hort Innovation 228 Evaluating activities under the EPPRD 185 Sugar Research Australia 228 Managing biosecurity incidents 186 Wine Australia 228 Biosecurity Incident Management System 186 The Plant Biosecurity Research Initiative 229 The National Biosecurity Response Team 187 State and territory governments 230 Communication in an Emergency Plant Pest response 187 University and private research institutes 230 Responses to Emergency Plant Pest incursions 188 Collaborative research arrangements 230 Maintaining the capacity to respond to incursions 194 Centre for Crop and Disease Management 230 Oversight of biosecurity emergency preparedness training 194 Centre for Fruit Fly Biosecurity Innovation 230 Qualifications for biosecurity emergency responses 194 Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis 231 Practical training for biosecurity emergency responses 195 Australian Plant Biosecurity Science Foundation 231 Online training in biosecurity 196 Cooperative Research Centres 232 CHAPTER 7: POST-BORDER BIOSECURITY – CONTROLLING CRC for Honey Bee Products 232 PESTS AND WEEDS 199 Plant Biosecurity CRC 232 Plant biosecurity RD&E projects in 2018 234 National and state oversight of domestic quarantine 201 Subcommittee on Domestic Quarantine and Market Access 201 APPENDICES 269 Restrictions for interstate travellers and transport of produce 201 Organisation contact details 270 Official control of quarantine plant pests to protect overseas trade 202 Glossary 272 Australia’s regionalised pests 202 Acronyms 274 Preventing the spread of fruit flies 207 Community involvement in domestic quarantine 208 INDEX 277 Figures Tables Figure 1. Australia’s varied climatic zones 10 Table 1. Plant biosecurity related legislation across Australia 21 Figure 2. Gross value of plant and animal production industries in Australia, Table 2. Plant Health Australia members 33 1972–2018 11 Table 3. Australia’s National Priority Plant Pests 40 Figure 3. Key components of Australia’s plant biosecurity system 17 Table 4. The top 10 National Priority Plant Pests 41 Figure 4. National government biosecurity committees and working groups Table 5. Current biosecurity plans covering Australia's plant industries 44 with plant focus 19 Table 6. High Priority Pest threats 45 Figure 5. Catchment scale land use in Australia 39 Table 7. Contingency plans 55 Figure 6. Comparative value of Australia’s plant production industries, Table 8. Biosecurity manuals for producers 61 based on gross value of production, 2016–17 64 Table 9–45. Industry specific High Priority Pest lists 66 Figure 7–86. Industry production data 67 Table 46. Australian Government import policy advice, final and in progress 131 Figure 87. Entity responsibility for biosecurity risks, first points of entry (ports) 143 Table 47. Australia's export legislation, administered by the Department Figure 88. Ports of Australia 145 of Agriculture and Water Resources 135 Figure 89. Biosecurity risk pathways regulated by NAQS 146 Table 48. Market access achievements for pollinator and plant product Figure 90. National Plant Biosecurity Surveillance System framework 151 exports from Australia since 2000 136 Figure 91. Surveillance programs by target host 158 Table 49. Australia's post-entry plant quarantine facilities 147 Figure 92. Surveillance programs by target pest type 158 Table 50. Australia's plant biosecurity surveillance programs 158 Figure 93. National Diagnostic Protocol endorsement process 168 Table 51. National Diagnostic Protocols 169 Figure 94.
Recommended publications
  • JOURNAL of NEMATOLOGY Description of Heterodera
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY Article | DOI: 10.21307/jofnem-2020-097 e2020-97 | Vol. 52 Description of Heterodera microulae sp. n. (Nematoda: Heteroderinae) from China a new cyst nematode in the Goettingiana group Wenhao Li1, Huixia Li1,*, Chunhui Ni1, Deliang Peng2, Yonggang Liu3, Ning Luo1 and Abstract 1 Xuefen Xu A new cyst-forming nematode, Heterodera microulae sp. n., was 1College of Plant Protection, Gansu isolated from the roots and rhizosphere soil of Microula sikkimensis Agricultural University/Biocontrol in China. Morphologically, the new species is characterized by Engineering Laboratory of Crop lemon-shaped body with an extruded neck and obtuse vulval cone. Diseases and Pests of Gansu The vulval cone of the new species appeared to be ambifenestrate Province, Lanzhou, 730070, without bullae and a weak underbridge. The second-stage juveniles Gansu Province, China. have a longer body length with four lateral lines, strong stylets with rounded and flat stylet knobs, tail with a comparatively longer hyaline 2 State Key Laboratory for Biology area, and a sharp terminus. The phylogenetic analyses based on of Plant Diseases and Insect ITS-rDNA, D2-D3 of 28S rDNA, and COI sequences revealed that the Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, new species formed a separate clade from other Heterodera species Chinese Academy of Agricultural in Goettingiana group, which further support the unique status of Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. H. microulae sp. n. Therefore, it is described herein as a new species 3Institute of Plant Protection, Gansu of genus Heterodera; additionally, the present study provided the first Academy of Agricultural Sciences, record of Goettingiana group in Gansu Province, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences Vol.(6), No.(1) (2019)
    Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences Vol.(6), No.(1) (2019) Efficacy of ecofriendly biocontrol Azotobacter chroococcum and Lac- tobacillus rhamnosus for enhancing plant growth and reducing infec- tion by Neoscytalidium spp. in fig (Ficus carica L.) saplings Sabah Lateef Alwan Hawraa N. Hussein Professor Assistant lecturer Plant Protection Department, Agriculture College, University of Kufa Email: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of the research was to use the environment-friendly agents to reduce the effect of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum and Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae, that cause dieback and blacking stem on several agricultural crops. This disease was the first record on fig trees in Iraq by this study and registered in GenBank under accession numbers : MF682357 , MF682358, in addition to its involvement in causing derma- tomycosis to human. In order to reduce environmental pollution due to chemical pes- ticides, two antagonistic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus (isolated from yoghurt) and Azotobacter chroococcum (isolated from soil) were used to against pathogenic fungi N. dimidiatum and N. novahollandiae. The in vitro tests showed that both bio- agents bacteria were highly antagonistic to both pathogenic fungal reducing their ra- dial growth to 44 and 75% respectively . Results of greenhouse experiments in pot showed that both A. chroococcum and L.rhamnosus decreased severity of infection by pathogenic fungi and enhanced plant health and growth. All the growth parameters of fig trees including leaf area, content
    [Show full text]
  • Lista De Plantas Hospedantes De Ptinidae (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) De Chile
    www.biotaxa.org/rce. ISSN 0718-8994 (online) Revista Chilena de Entomología (2020) 46 (2): 333-344. Artículo Científico Lista de plantas hospedantes de Ptinidae (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) de Chile List of host plants of Ptinidae (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) from Chile Alfredo Lüer1 1Panguilemo N° 261, Quilicura, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected] ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 2FC25622-B93B-4E6E-85ED-555EB2DA2C51 https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.46.2.20.26 Resumen. A partir de antecedentes publicados y la revisión de colecciones entomológicas nacionales, se entrega una lista de plantas hospedantes de Ptinidae (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) presentes en Chile. Para la mayoría de las especies en estado larval se constatan hábitos polífagos y la madera muerta resulta ser el sustrato más utilizado. Palabras clave: Larva, madera muerta, nuevos registros, polifagia. Abstract. A list of host plants of Ptinidae (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) present in Chile is provided, based on the published information and the review of national entomological collections. For most species in the larval stage, polyphagous habits are confirmed and dead wood turns to be the most used substrate. Key words: Dead wood, larva, new records, polyphagy. Introducción La familia Ptinidae Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Bostrichoidea) está compuesta a nivel mundial por cerca de 2.900 especies agrupadas en 259 géneros (Zahradník y Háva 2014), siendo las regiones templadas las que presentan la mayor cantidad de especies descritas (Philips y Bell 2010). En Chile, este taxón esta representado por 36 géneros y 110 especies, distribuidas en territorio continental e insular (Pic 1950; Hatch 1933; Blackwelder 1945; White 1974, 1979, 1980; Español 1989, 1995; González 1989; Español y Blas 1991; Barriga et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Parasitic Nematodes and Their Management: a Review
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (Online) Vol.8, No.1, 2018 Plant-Parasitic Nematodes and Their Management: A Review Misgana Mitiku Department of Plant Pathology, Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Jinka, Agricultural Research Center, Jinka, Ethiopia Abstract Nowhere will the need to sustainably increase agricultural productivity in line with increasing demand be more pertinent than in resource poor areas of the world, especially Africa, where populations are most rapidly expanding. Although a 35% population increase is projected by 2050. Significant improvements are consequently necessary in terms of resource use efficiency. In moving crop yields towards an efficiency frontier, optimal pest and disease management will be essential, especially as the proportional production of some commodities steadily shifts. With this in mind, it is essential that the full spectrums of crop production limitations are considered appropriately, including the often overlooked nematode constraints about half of all nematode species are marine nematodes, 25% are free-living, soil inhabiting nematodes, I5% are animal and human parasites and l0% are plant parasites. Today, even with modern technology, 5-l0% of crop production is lost due to nematodes in developed countries. So, the aim of this work was to review some agricultural nematodes genera, species they contain and their management methods. In this review work the species, feeding habit, morphology, host and symptoms they show on the effected plant and management of eleven nematode genera was reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Neoscytalidium Dimidiatum and N. Novaehollandiae on Mangifera Indica and N
    CSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/apdn Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2010, 5,48–50 First record of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum and N. novaehollandiae on Mangifera indica and N. dimidiatum on Ficus carica in Australia J. D. Ray A,D, T. Burgess B and V. M. Lanoiselet C AAustralian Quarantine and Inspection Service, NAQS/OSP, 1 Pederson Road, Marrara, NT 0812, Australia. BSchool of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. CDepartment of Agriculture and Food, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Neoscytalidium dimidiatum is reported for the first time in Australia associated with dieback of mango and common fig. Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae is reported for the first time associated with dieback of mango. Neoscytalidium dimidiatum has a wide geographical and host range. For example, it has been reported on Albizia lebbeck, Delonix regia, Ficus carica, Ficus spp., Peltophorum petrocarpum and Thespesia populena in Oman (Elshafie and Ba-Omar 2001); on Arbutus, Castanea, Citrus, Ficus, Juglans, Musa, Populus, Prunus, Rhus, Sequoiadendron in the USA (Farr et al. 1989); and on Mangifera indica in Niger (Reckhaus 1987). Stress factors such as water stress enhance the severity of disease caused by this fungus and symptoms include branch wilt, dieback, canker, gummosis and tree death (Punithalingam and Waterson 1970; Reckhaus 1987; Elshafie and Ba-Omar 2001). Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae was recently described from north-western Australia as an endophyte of Adansonia gibbosa, Acacia synchronica, Crotalaria medicaginea and Grevillia agrifolia (Pavlic et al. 2008). A joint Plant Health Survey was carried out by the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS) and the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (DAFWA) in the Ord River Irrigation Area (ORIA) of Western Australia (WA) during August 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Regulating the Population Dynamics and Damage Potential of Pollen Beetle (Meligethes Aeneus F.) on Crops of Oilseed Rape
    Factors regulating the population dynamics and damage potential of pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus F.) on crops of oilseed rape Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Marie-Luise Tölle geboren in Gifhorn Göttingen, Mai 2014 D 7 1. Referentin/Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal 2. Korreferentin/Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Andreas von Tiedemann Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.05.2011 Contents Table of contents page Chapter I General introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 The pest: Meligethes aeneus ............................................................................................. 2 Factors influencing the population dynamics of pollen beetle ............................................ 3 Possible effects of insecticides on population growth and damage of pollen beetle ........... 4 Parasitoids and parasitisation of pollen beetle ................................................................... 5 Trap cropping in oilseed rape ............................................................................................ 6 References ........................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter II Cultivar and phenology of winter oilseed rape affect the abundance and reproduction of Meligethes aeneus (Fabricius) ......................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Biologicznych
    Praktyczne zastosowania badań mikro - BIOLOGICZNYCH pod redakcją Wojciecha Truszkowskiego Praktyczne zastosowania badań mikrobiologicznych Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Praktyczne zastosowania badań mikrobiologicznych pod red. Wojciecha Truszkowskiego Olsztyn 2019 Praktyczne zastosowania badań mikrobiologicznych Monografia naukowa pod redakcją dr. Wojciecha Truszkowskiego Recenzenci: dr hab. Anna Biedunkiewicz dr hab. Marta Damszel Korekta: Irmina Sitkowska Nakład: 30 egz. 10 ark. wyd. ISBN 978-83-943385-9-6 © Katedra Agrotechnologii, Zarządzania Produkcją Rolniczą i Agrobiznesu, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Druk: Zakład Poligraficzny Uniwersytetu Warmińsko – Mazurskiego w Olsztyne Olsztyn 2019 Monografia zawiera teksty artykułów nadesłane przez uczestników 48. MSKN „Międzynarodowe Seminarium Kół Naukowych. Koła naukowe szkołą twórczego działania” i to autorzy ponoszą odpowiedzialność za przedstawione treści. Praktyczne zastosowania badań mikrobiologicznych SPIS TREŚCI WPROWADZENIE ………...…………............................................................................................... 7 ROZDZIAŁ I. WPŁYW MIKROORGANIZMÓW NA BEZPIECZEŃSTWO SANITARNE I EKOLOGICZNE MARTYNA BUTA Obecność genów integrazy wśród bakterii ściekowych ………...………………….... 11 KAROLINA NOWACKA Różnorodność gatunkowa grzybów fitopatogenicznych fyllosfery wybranych makrofitów jezior Skanda i Kortowskie ………...………………………………….... 22 WIKTOR ZIELIŃSKI Występowanie grzybów rodzaju Aspergillus w wodzie z fontanny w Parku Centralnym w Olsztynie ………...…………………………………………………....................
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Erysiphe Syringae-Japonicae</I>
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2015. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/130.259 Volume 130, pp. 259–264 January–March 2015 First record of Erysiphe syringae-japonicae in Turkey Ilgaz Akata* & Vasyl P. Heluta 1Ankara University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, TR 06100, Ankara, Turkey 2M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2 Tereshchenkivska St., Kiev, 01601, Ukraine *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract — Erysiphe syringae-japonicae was reported on leaves of Syringa vulgaris for the first time from Turkey. A short description, distribution, and illustrations for this powdery mildew fungus are provided and discussed briefly. Key words — Asia Minor, Erysiphales, invasive species, lilac, Microsphaera Introduction A powdery mildew collected in Japan on the lilac, Syringa amurensis var. japonica [= S. reticulata], was described by Braun (1982) as Microsphaera syringae-japonicae (Erysiphales, Ascomycota). Later, this species was reported from the Russian Far East (Bunkina 1991, as “Microsphaera syringae”) and from Korea (Shin 2000). Microsphaera syringae-japonicae was already known on lilacs in North America and Europe, and was distinguished from M. syringae, mainly by its evanescent mycelium, its larger number of spores in the ascus, and its usually more extensively pigmented chasmothecial appendage bases. In 1988, one of the authors (VP Heluta) critically examined the type specimens of powdery mildews described from the Russian Far East, and showed that one of them, the type specimen of M. aceris on leaves of Acer barbinerve, had chasmothecia identical to those of M. syringae-japonicae. However they were in adherent groups that could have drifted from another host such as aSyringa sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi Determined in Ankara University Tandoğan Campus Area (Ankara-Turkey)
    http://dergipark.gov.tr/trkjnat Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 20(1): 47-55, 2019 ISSN 2147-0294, e-ISSN 2528-9691 Research Article DOI: 10.23902/trkjnat.521256 FUNGI DETERMINED IN ANKARA UNIVERSITY TANDOĞAN CAMPUS AREA (ANKARA-TURKEY) Ilgaz AKATA1*, Deniz ALTUNTAŞ1, Şanlı KABAKTEPE2 1Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Ankara, TURKEY 2Turgut Ozal University, Battalgazi Vocational School, Battalgazi, Malatya, TURKEY *Corresponding author: ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1731-1302, e-mail: [email protected] Cite this article as: Akata I., Altuntaş D., Kabaktepe Ş. 2019. Fungi Determined in Ankara University Tandoğan Campus Area (Ankara-Turkey). Trakya Univ J Nat Sci, 20(1): 47-55, DOI: 10.23902/trkjnat.521256 Received: 02 February 2019, Accepted: 14 March 2019, Online First: 15 March 2019, Published: 15 April 2019 Abstract: The current study is based on fungi and infected host plant samples collected from Ankara University Tandoğan Campus (Ankara) between 2017 and 2019. As a result of the field and laboratory studies, 148 fungal species were identified. With the addition of formerly recorded 14 species in the study area, a total of 162 species belonging to 87 genera, 49 families, and 17 orders were listed. Key words: Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Ankara, Turkey. Özet: Bu çalışma, Ankara Üniversitesi Tandoğan Kampüsü'nden (Ankara) 2017 ve 2019 yılları arasında toplanan mantar ve enfekte olmuş konukçu bitki örneklerine dayanmaktadır. Arazi ve laboratuvar çalışmaları sonucunda 148 mantar türü tespit edilmiştir. Daha önce bildirilen 14 tür dahil olmak üzere 17 ordo, 49 familya, 87 cinse mensup 162 tür listelenmiştir. Introduction Ankara, the capital city of Turkey, is situated in the compiled literature data were published as checklists in center of Anatolia, surrounded by Çankırı in the north, different times (Bahçecioğlu & Kabaktepe 2012, Doğan Bolu in the northwest, Kırşehir, and Kırıkkale in the east, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Torilis Leptophylla (L.) Rchb. F. (Apiaceae)
    Weed Risk Assessment for Torilis United States leptophylla (L.) Rchb. f. (Apiaceae) – Department of Bristlefruit hedgeparsley Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service March 22, 2017 Version 1 Left: Herbarium sample of the inflorescence of T. leptophylla [image obtained from the Missouri Botanical Garden under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 (MBG, 2017)]. Right: Detailed drawing of the fruit showing the barbs at the end of the spines (source: Reed, 1977). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Torilis leptophylla Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use the PPQ weed risk assessment (WRA) process (PPQ, 2015) to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. The PPQ WRA process includes three analytical components that together describe the risk profile of a plant species (risk potential, uncertainty, and geographic potential; PPQ, 2015).
    [Show full text]