Household Income in Tyne and Wear and City Region Supplement 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Household Income in Tyne and Wear and City Region Supplement 2007 HOUSEHOLD INCOME TYNE AND WEAR CITY REGION SUPPLEMENT 2007 September 2009 By John Horne, Peter Sturman and Kadhem Jallab Reference: EP 09/09 TYNE & WEAR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION 1st Floor Provincial House Northumberland Street Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7DQ Tel: (0191) 277 1912, Fax: (0191) 277 1911 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.twri.org.uk Supported jointly by Cities of Newcastle and Sunderland and the Metropolitan Boroughs of Gateshead, North Tyneside and South Tyneside Household Income 2007, Tyne and Wear City Region Supplement CONTENTS KEY POINTS ………….…………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ……….…………………………………………………………………..………. 2 1.1 HMRC Personal Income ……………………………………..……………………………………… 2 1.2 Household Income (Estimated by Middle Super Output Area) ………………………………….. 2 1.3 Indices of Deprivation 2007 ………………………………………………………………………… 3 TABLES 3.3S Number of LSOAs by Area and Selected Deprivation Band, Income Domain ………………… 4 3.4S Average Income Domain Score, Overall and by Upper and Lower Bands …………………… 5 3.5S [Children] Number of LSOAs by Area and Selected Deprivation Band, IDAC ………………… 6 3.6S Average IDAC Score, Overall and by Upper and Lower Bands ………………………………… 7 3.7S [Older People] Number of LSOAs by Area and Selected Deprivation Band, IDAOP ………… 8 3.8S Average IDAOP Score, Overall and by Upper and Lower Bands ……………………………… 9 APPENDICES 1.1S Personal Income (Mean) ……………………………………………………………………………. 10 1.2S Personal Income (Median) .………………………….……………………………………………… 11 A3.6 Modelled Household Income Estimates for Durham MSOAs within TWCR 1 …………………… 12 A3.7 Modelled Household Income Estimates for Northumberland MSOAs within TWCR …………. 13 1 TWCR – Tyne and Wear City Region; an area covering the former local authority districts of Chester-le- Street, Derwentside, Durham, Easington, Blyth Valley, Castle Morpeth, Tynedale and Wansbeck plus the local authority districts of Gateshead, Newcastle, North Tyneside, South Tyneside and Sunderland. Tyne & Wear Research and Information Household Income 2007, Tyne and Wear City Region Supplement KEY POINTS This supplementary report presents information on the household incomes of residents in the Tyne and Wear City Region (TWCR). It should be used in conjunction with Household Income in Tyne and Wear 2007. • In 2006/07, within the Tyne and Wear City Region Districts, Easington had the lowest mean personal income (£17,900) at only 70% of the UK (§1.1). Castle Morpeth had the highest (£33,200), 130% of the UK. These estimates of personal income are subject to a wide margin of error. Source: Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, HMRC. • Household Income by MSOA (2004/05 estimates from ONS) (§1.2) (Appendix 3). These can be found on the Neighbourhood Statistics website. 2 • Just under 18% of LSOAs in the North East fell within the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England (§1.3). Source: Department of Communities and Local Government, Indices of Deprivation 2007 (ID 2007). • On the ID 2007 Income Domain, 14% of LSOAs in the TWCR fall within the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England (§1.3). • On the Income Deprivation Affecting Children (IDAC) Index, 11% of LSOAs in the TWCR fall within the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England (Table 3.5S). • On the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOP) Index, 15% of LSOAs in the TWCR fall within the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England (Table 3.7S). Note: Comparisons, through time, for the UK, show real incomes have risen by about a third since the early 1990s, and broadly doubled since the 1970s. 2 (Lower-level) Super Output Areas, with an average population of about 2,000 people Tyne & Wear Research and Information 1 Household Income 2007, Tyne and Wear City Region Supplement 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is a supplement to Household Income in Tyne and Wear 2007 and should be used in conjunction with that report. Eight tables in the main report, including two tables in Appendix 1, have been expanded for the supplement. These tables are numbered as in the main report but include a suffix S. In addition, two extra tables are included in Appendix 3. [Note that this supplement does not include an Appendix 2 because there were no expansions or additions to this appendix.] This supplement includes expanded tables on Personal Income (from Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, HMRC), Household Income Estimates by ONS and Income Indicators from the Index of Deprivation 2007. 1.1 HMRC Personal Income HMRC’s estimates of Personal Income have very wide confidence intervals at District-level. (Detailed estimates are given in Appendix 1 for information only). The confidence intervals for average income at District level range from about ±£600 (Sunderland) to ±£4,400 (Castle Morpeth). This is equivalent to ±3% of the stated estimate for Sunderland and ±13% for Castle Morpeth. In 2006/07, within the Tyne and Wear City Region Districts, Easington had the lowest mean Personal Income (£17,900) at only 70% of the UK. Two Districts had Personal Incomes above the UK average; Tynedale (£27,500) and Castle Morpeth (£33,200); 108% and 130% of the UK average respectively. 1.2 Household Income (Estimated by Middle Super Output Area) ONS has produced a series of model-based income estimates for Middle Super Output Areas (MSOAs) in England & Wales. The estimates were produced for 2004/05. Estimates are for four income types: • Average weekly household total income (unequivalised). • Average weekly household net income (unequivalised). • Average weekly household net income before housing costs (equivalised). • Average weekly household net income after housing costs (equivalised). Within the Tyne & Wear City Region MSOAs, Blyth Valley 006 (BV006) has the highest gross weekly household income at £1,020pw (or £53,040 annually). BV006 includes the Northburn area of Cramlington. Newcastle 030 (Nc030) has the lowest gross weekly income at £320 (or £16,640 annually). Nc030 covers most of Walker Riverside and includes St. Anthony’s. Detailed income estimates for Durham and Northumberland MSOAs within the Tyne and Wear City Region are provided in Appendix 3S. Since MSOA boundaries are not as well known as wards, the average weekly household total income (unequivalised) has been mapped for all MSOAs within the City Region. [These estimates can be found on the Neighbourhood Statistics website. They are not yet fully accredited by ONS as a National Statistic; instead they are labelled Experimental Statistics.] 2 Tyne & Wear Research and Information Household Income 2007, Tyne and Wear City Region Supplement 1.3 Indices of Deprivation 2007 The ID 2007 income domain can be used to identify Super Output Areas (SOA) with the greatest poverty. It directly counts the number of people (including children) dependent on one of the four means-tested benefits. This produces estimates of the proportion of people deprived of a reasonable income. The ID 2007 was constructed by the Social Disadvantage Research Centre (SDRC) at the Department of Social Policy and Social Work at the University of Oxford. Two supplementary indices, relating to income, have been produced alongside the ID 2007: • Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) • Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) Just under 18% of LSOAs in the North East fell within the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England on ID 2007. The only region to exceed the North East was the North West, which had the highest proportion (20.4%); the South East had the lowest (1.8%). In terms of income deprivation, Tyne and Wear City Region has 152 LSOAs (14%) in the most deprived 10% of LSOAs in England. There are 32,482 LSOAs in England. Tyne & Wear Research and Information 3 Household Income 2007, Tyne and Wear City Region Supplement On the Income Domain measure, 24% of Newcastle’s LSOAs are in the most deprived 10% of English LSOAs (Table 3.3S). In Sunderland, 21% are in the most deprived 10%; followed by South Tyneside (19%), Gateshead (15%), Easington (13%) and Wansbeck (12%). The other Districts are all below 10%. In Castle Morpeth and Tynedale there are no LSOAs within the 10% most deprived of English LSOAs. Table 3.3S Number of LSOAs by Area and by Selected Deprivation Band 1, Income Domain within 5% within 5% most least All deprived 1 >5% <=10% 1 >90% <=95% 1 deprived 1 Blyth Valley 52 2 2 3 6 Castle Morpeth 33 0 0 1 6 Chester-le-Street 34 1 0 3 1 Derwentside 55 0 4 0 0 Durham 54 0 1 6 6 Easington 63 3 5 1 1 Gateshead 126 10 9 5 2 Newcastle upon Tyne 173 23 18 11 10 North Tyneside 129 4 5 7 6 South Tyneside 103 9 11 1 2 Sunderland 188 12 28 7 0 Tynedale 38 0 0 1 1 Wansbeck 41 1 4 1 3 Tyne and Wear City Region 1,089 65 87 47 44 Percentage of total by area Blyth Valley 100.0% 3.8% 3.8% 5.8% 11.5% Castle Morpeth 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 18.2% Chester-le-Street 100.0% 2.9% 0.0% 8.8% 2.9% Derwentside 100.0% 0.0% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0% Durham 100.0% 0.0% 1.9% 11.1% 11.1% Easington 100.0% 4.8% 7.9% 1.6% 1.6% Gateshead 100.0% 7.9% 7.1% 4.0% 1.6% Newcastle upon Tyne 100.0% 13.3% 10.4% 6.4% 5.8% North Tyneside 100.0% 3.1% 3.9% 5.4% 4.7% South Tyneside 100.0% 8.7% 10.7% 1.0% 1.9% Sunderland 100.0% 6.4% 14.9% 3.7% 0.0% Tynedale 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 2.6% Wansbeck 100.0% 2.4% 9.8% 2.4% 7.3% Tyne and Wear City Region 100.0% 6.0% 8.0% 4.3% 4.0% Source: Department of Communities and Local Government, Indices of Deprivation 2007.
Recommended publications
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham
    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Derwentside College
    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Derwentside College August 1997 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council has a legal duty to make sure further education in England is properly assessed. The FEFC’s inspectorate inspects and reports on each college of further education every four years. The inspectorate also assesses and reports nationally on the curriculum and gives advice to the FEFC’s quality assessment committee. College inspections are carried out in accordance with the framework and guidelines described in Council Circular 93/28. They involve full-time inspectors and registered part-time inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the work they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member who does not work in education and a member of staff from the college being inspected. Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT Telephone 01203 863000 Fax 01203 863100 © FEFC 1997 You may photocopy this report. CONTENTS Paragraph Summary Introduction 1 The college and its aims 2 Responsiveness and range of provision 10 Governance and management 19 Students’ recruitment, guidance and support 30 Teaching and the promotion of learning 40 Students’ achievements 50 Quality assurance 61 Resources 70 Conclusions and issues 80 Figures GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are set out in the Council Circular 93/28. During their inspection, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Their assessments are set out in the reports. They also use a five-point grading scale to summarise the balance between strengths and weaknesses. The descriptors for the grades are: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • grade 4 – provision in which the weaknesses clearly outweigh the strengths • grade 5 – provision which has many weaknesses and very few strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure
    Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Topic paper 11: Green infrastructure Wiltshire Core Strategy Consultation January 2012 Wiltshire Council Information about Wiltshire Council services can be made available on request in other languages including BSL and formats such as large print and audio. Please contact the council on 0300 456 0100, by textphone on 01225 712500 or by email on [email protected]. This paper is one of 16 topic papers, listed below, which form part of the evidence base in support of the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. These topic papers have been produced in order to present a coordinated view of some of the main evidence that has been considered in drafting the emerging Core Strategy. It is hoped that this will make it easier to understand how we have reached our conclusions. The papers are all available from the council website: Topic Paper 1: Climate Change Topic Paper 2: Housing Topic Paper 3: Settlement Strategy Topic Paper 4: Rural Signposting Tool Topic Paper 5: Natural Environment Topic Paper 6: Retail Topic Paper 7: Economy Topic Paper 8: Infrastructure and Planning Obligations Topic Paper 9: Built and Historic Environment Topic Paper 10: Transport Topic Paper 11: Green Infrastructure Topic Paper 12: Site Selection Process Topic Paper 13: Military Issues Topic Paper 14: Building Resilient Communities Topic Paper 15: Housing Requirement Technical Paper Topic Paper 16: Gypsy and Travellers Contents 1. Executive summary 1 2. Introduction 2 2.1 What is green infrastructure (GI)? 2 2.2 The benefits of GI 4 2.3 A GI Strategy for Wiltshire 5 2.4 Collaborative working 6 3.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Volume 2)
    Durham E-Theses Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham Scott, David John How to cite: Scott, David John (2008) Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2229/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Local Governance, Governmental Practices, and the Production of Policy: Local Strategic Partnerships and Area-Based 'Multiple Deprivation' in County Durham Volume 2 of 2 David John Scott Ph.D. thesis The copyright of this thesis rests with the author or the university to which it was submitted. No quotation from it, or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or university, and any information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • N No of Establishments Ot Yet Rated Fo Intervent
    Authority Total No of No of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total % of Total Total No of Total No Total No Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Total No of Establishments Establishments Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Broadly Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions Interventions number of formal of formal of formal formal formal formal formal formal formal (inc unrated) not yet rated for compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant compliant achieved achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - achieved - samples enforcement enforcem enforceme enforcement enforcement enforcemen enforceme enforcement enforcement intervention premises premises - A premises - B premises - C premises - D premises - E Premises Rated A Premises Rated B Premises Rated C Premises Rated D Premises Rated E taken actions taken ent nt actions actions taken actions taken t actions nt actions actions taken - actions taken - - actions taken - - Seizure, - taken - taken - Improvement Remedial Prosecutions taken - Voluntary dentention Suspension/r Emergency Prohibtion Notices Action & Simple closures and evocation of Prohibition Orders Detention Cautions surrender of approval Notices Notices food DISTRICT COUNCILS Adur 446 39 82.3% 0.0% 29.4% 81.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 100.0% 100.0% 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 Allerdale 1332 77 92.0% 0.0% 46.7% 88.2% 97.1% 99.8% 90.4% 100.0% 97.6% 96.2% 93.9% 70.4% 59 0
    [Show full text]
  • Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003
    Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 19 Belonging to Northumberland County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier local authority areas only; the results may however identify issues which overlap with adjacent areas. Reports and data for other two-tier areas are provided under separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Bulletin 32.Rtf
    Conservation Bulletin, Issue 32, July 1997 Planning change in London 1 Editorial: a new Government 3 Grant aid offered in 1996/7 4 The future for archaeology 8 Roofs of England 10 Planning and listing directions issued 11 Post-war and thematic listing 12 Long-term planning for Ironbridge Gorge 14 New Chief Executive for EH 16 Perspectives on sustainability 16 The Shimizu case 17 Books and Notes 18,20 Defining archaeological finds 22 Appraising conservation areas 24 (NB: page numbers are those of the original publication) London: planning change in a world city Antoine Grumbach’s design for an inhabited bridge across the Thames was joint winner of the recent ‘Living Bridges’ exhibition at the Royal Academy Tall buildings. New Thames bridges. Better architecture. A new planning policy for London. These four topics were the focus of an English Heritage debate held on 29 May before an invited audience of developers, architects, journalists and policy makers at the Royal College of Physicians. Philip Davies reports ‘London – planning change in a world city’, chaired by the broadcaster and journalist Kirsty Wark, provided a rare opportunity for some of London’s key figures to discuss the future of London and to set out their vision for the capital. The Challenge London faces serious challenges to its distinctive character. Plans for towers of an unprecedented scale and height, and for new and enlarged bridges across the Thames, could change forever the way the city looks and functions. Successive surveys have confirmed that people and businesses are attracted to London not only as the centre of government, communications and financial expertise, but also because it has retained its sense of history and the diversity of its built heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 26Th February 1976 2953
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 26TH FEBRUARY 1976 2953 A copy of the Order and the map contained in it has SELBY DISTRICT COUNCIL been deposited and may be inspected free of charge at NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF PUBLIC PATH ORDER the office of the Secretary of Huntingdon District Council, County Buildings, Huntingdon during normal office hours. HIGHWAYS ACT, 1959 Any representation or objection with respect to the COUNTRYSIDE ACT, 1968 Order may be sent in writing to the office of the Secretary, The District Council of Selby (Parish of Lead—Bridlepath Huntingdon District Council, County Buildings, Hunting- No. 1) Public Path Diversion Order No. 2, 1975 don before the 9th April 1976, and should state the grounds upon which it is made. Notice is hereby given that on the 13th February 1976 If no representation or objection are duly made, or if the District Council of Selby confirmed the above-named any so made are withdrawn the Huntingdon District Order. Council may instead of submitting the Order to the Secre- The effect of the Order as confirmed is to divert the tary of State for the Environment themselves confirm the public right of way running from the Crooked Billet and Order. If the Order is submitted to the Secretary of State along the drive way to Leadhall Farmhouse to a line running any representations and objections which have been duly parallel to the existing right of way on the eastern side made and not withdrawn will be transmitted with the of the fence to the grounds of Leadhall Farmhouse. Order. A copy of the Order as confirmed and the map contained in it has been deposited and may be inspected free of Dated 13th February 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Derwentside
    DERWENTSIDE Business 06 07 & / Community DIRECTORY Background Information con t en t s Premise, by Right Honorable Hilary Armstrong 3 Derwentside the District 5 “If we do what Introduction, by LSP Chair, Alex Watson 7 we’ve always Business & Economy done then we’ll A great place for business 9 only get what Derwentside economic profile 11 we’ve always Business support and partnerships 3 got” Flagship projects (Emerge, Beacon, Agility, Enterprise Place) 15 Tom Baker Your business matters 17 Education Lifelong Learning and education 19 Community Safety Safety in the community 19 E d it or Miles Crofton In the Best of Health 0191 586 6010 [email protected] Healthy living for a healthy lifestyle 19 Exxecu t ivve Eddit oor Housing & Environment Sarah J Lee An environment for success 19 [email protected] Childcare counts 19 Ed it oria l Paul Seales You and your Council 19 [email protected] Transport and communication 19 A dv ertisin g & Sponsorship Time out with tourism, leisure and shopping 19 Andrew White 0191 5866 040 Miscellaneous Case Studies 19 Bank Holidays 19 Derwentside Business & Community Directory is published by informnorth creative services, Calendar 2006 19 a County Durham based community interest company. We have taken all reasonable care to Conversions 19 ensure that material is accurate at the time of going to press, but accept no responsibility for Dialling Codes 19 errors or omissions and no liability is accepted for omission or failure from any cause. Travelling distances to UK centres 19 The publisher has welcomed contributions in production of this directory, all opinions UK& Ireland airports list 19 expressed are those of individual contributors and not necessarily our own.
    [Show full text]
  • Morpeth-Bedlington-Ashington
    TECHNICAL REPORT WA/90/14 Geology and land-use planning: Morpeth-Bedlington-Ashington Part 1 LAND-USEPLANNING I Jackson and D J D Lawrence This report has been generated from a scanned image of the document with any blank pages removed at the scanning stage. Please be aware that the pagination and scales of diagrams or maps in the resulting report may not appear as in the original BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT WA/90/14 Onshore Geology Series Geology and land-use planning: Morpeth-Bedlington-Ashington Part 1 LAND-USEPLANNING 1:25 000 sheets NZ28 andNZ 38 Parts of 1:50000 geological sheets 9 (Rothbury), 10 (Newbiggin), 14 (Morpeth) and 15 (Tynemouth) I Jackson and D J D Lawrence This study was commissioned by the Department of the Environ- ment, but the views expressed in it are not necessarily those of the Department Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping Geographical index UK, England, Northumberland Subject index Land-use planning, thematic maps, resources, mining, engin- eering geology, Quaternary, Carboniferous Bibliographic reference Jackson, I, and Lawrence, D J D. 1990. Geology and land- use planning: Morpeth- Bedlington-Ashington. Part 1: Land-use planning. British Geological Survey Technical Report WA/90/14 0 NERC copyright 1990 Keyworth,Nottingham British Geological Survey1990 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available through the Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Sales Desks at Keyworth, Murchison House, Edinburgh, and at Plumtree (06077) 6111 Telex378173 BGSKEY G the BGS London Information Office in the Geological Museum. Fax 06077-6602 The adjacent Geological Museum bookshop stocks the more popular books for sale over the counter.
    [Show full text]