DOCSLIB.ORG

The Six Dimensions of Collective Leadership That Advance Sustainability Objectives: Rethinking What It Means to Be an Academic Leader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Six Dimensions of Collective Leadership That Advance Sustainability Objectives: Rethinking What It Means to Be an Academic Leader Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications Natural Resource Ecology and Management 2021 The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader Jill Caviglia-Harris Salisbury University Karen E. Hodges University of British Columbia Okanagan Brian Helmuth Northeastern University Elena M. Bennett McGill University Kathleen Galvin Colorado State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Sustainability Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ nrem_pubs/390. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resource Ecology and Management at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader Abstract Solutions to our most pressing environmental problems demand the development and application of leadership skills that are not typically fostered in traditional academic programs: skills that advance new transdisciplinary approaches to co-produce knowledge that can be mobilized for action. We outline a new collective leadership model with six dimensions, Inquire, Connect, Engage, Strategize, Empower, and Reflect, and show through a series of case studies how each of these leadership dimensions can be used to create positive and lasting change for people and their environments. We also describe how academic researchers can learn to apply these dimensions in their own work and introduce a series of companion online narratives and teaching resources designed to facilitate the use of this collective leadership model in classrooms. Keywords collective leadership, knowledge to action, sustainability, transdisciplinary leadership Disciplines Educational Leadership | Natural Resources Management and Policy | Sustainability Comments This article is published as Caviglia-Harris, J., K. E. Hodges, B. Helmuth, E. M. Bennett, K. Galvin, M. Krebs, K. Lips, M. Lowman, L. A. Schulte, and E. A. G. Schuur. 2021. The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader. Ecology and Society 26(3):9. doi:10.5751/ES-12396-260309. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Authors Jill Caviglia-Harris, Karen E. Hodges, Brian Helmuth, Elena M. Bennett, Kathleen Galvin, Margaret Krebs, Karen Lips, Meg Lowman, Lisa A. Schulte, and Edward A. G. Schuur This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs/390 Copyright © 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Caviglia-Harris, J., K. E. Hodges, B. Helmuth, E. M. Bennett, K. Galvin, M. Krebs, K. Lips, M. Lowman, L. A. Schulte, and E. A. G. Schuur. 2021. The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader. Ecology and Society 26(3):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12396-260309 Insight The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader Jill Caviglia-Harris 1, Karen E. Hodges 2, Brian Helmuth 3, Elena M. Bennett 4, Kathleen Galvin 5, Margaret Krebs 6,7, Karen Lips 8, Meg Lowman 9,10, Lisa A. Schulte 11 and Edward A. G. Schuur 12 ABSTRACT. Solutions to our most pressing environmental problems demand the development and application of leadership skills that are not typically fostered in traditional academic programs: skills that advance new transdisciplinary approaches to co-produce knowledge that can be mobilized for action. We outline a new collective leadership model with six dimensions, Inquire, Connect, Engage, Strategize, Empower, and Reflect, and show through a series of case studies how each of these leadership dimensions can be used to create positive and lasting change for people and their environments. We also describe how academic researchers can learn to apply these dimensions in their own work and introduce a series of companion online narratives and teaching resources designed to facilitate the use of this collective leadership model in classrooms. Key Words: collective leadership; knowledge to action; sustainability; transdisciplinary leadership INTRODUCTION gathering efforts), social learning (through changes in health Most pressing environmental problems are complex, cross outcomes, quality of life, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors), jurisdictional borders, and require a mix of scientific, stakeholder, researcher training (through leadership initiatives and workshops and transdisciplinary knowledge to be addressed effectively on collective leadership), and knowledge governance (through (Safford et al. 2017). Although it is widely known that using changes in policy and law). Early approaches for addressing the scientific, practical, and experiential knowledge to inform policy, research-implementation gap focused on providing researcher grassroots, and other action is key to addressing such issues (van knowledge to policy actors who would theoretically translate Kerkhoff and Lebel 2006, Muñoz-Erickson and Cutts 2016), knowledge into action without any further input required by the many questions remain about how to bridge the gap between researcher. These “loading dock” models of scientific knowledge knowledge and action. Policy makers seldom read academic dissemination (Cash et al. 2006) were based on the deficit model journals (Dilling and Lemos 2011, Clark et al. 2016), practitioners or the belief that simply delivering objective knowledge to the rarely work with academics, and researchers often do not translate right stakeholders would lead to behavioral change and create findings to other media (Brownell et al. 2013). The “science of “action” (Logan 2001, Bauer et al. 2007, Dudo and Besley 2016). science communication” focuses on learning how to improve In other words, the needs and perceptions of stakeholders would communication of key scientific knowledge (Fischhoff and have no influence over how the information was collected or Scheufele 2013, 2019), but this translation is not enough if we are generated by the scientists. to continue to improve our efforts toward leadership (Fischhoff In contrast, complexity-oriented approaches focus on the co- 2019). Knowledge-based action requires approaches that link the development of knowledge, ideas, and solutions by scientific, stakeholder, and policy worlds (van Kerkhoff and Lebel acknowledging that effective solutions to intractable problems 2006, Matson et al. 2016) when addressing this “research- must account for the diverse needs, priorities, experiences, and implementation gap” (Lauber et al. 2011). This gap is particularly worldviews of multiple participants (Knapp et al. 2019, Stephens evident in academic research cultures (APLU 2019, NASEM 2020). Complexity-oriented models suggest that researchers, 2020), where tenure and promotion guidelines prioritize stakeholders, and policy-makers should be involved in creating recognition by academic peers and publications in scientific knowledge and translating it into action (West et al. 2019). Even journals, rather than efforts to co-produce (Ostrom 1996) and though this approach is a tall order for researchers who are not mobilize (Fazey et al. 2013) knowledge that directly informs and trained in implementation strategies, it can play an important role guides societal action. in addressing sustainability issues. Teams composed of Here we build on what Clark et al. (2016) refer to as “capacities individuals from diverse disciplines (inside and outside of to mobilize knowledge,” and define action as initiatives that academia) who work toward a common goal, but often with very mobilize knowledge to increase stakeholder engagement (through different approaches and thought processes, are frequently cited facilitation, citizen science activities, or other information- as the foundation of effective knowledge-to-action plans 1Economics and Finance Department, Environmental Studies Department, Salisbury University, 2Department of Biology, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 3Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences and School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, 4Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Bieler School of Environment, McGill University, 5Department of Anthropology and Geography, Colorado State University, 6Earth Leadership Program, 7Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 8Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 9TREE Foundation, 10National Geographic Explorer, 11Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management and Bioeconomy Institute, Iowa State University, 12Center for Ecosystem Science and Society and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University Ecology and Society 26(3): 9 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss3/art9/
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca
    Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Lamoreux, J. F., McKnight, M. W., and R. Cabrera Hernandez (2015). Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xxiv + 320pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1717-3 DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2015.SSC-OP.53.en Cover photographs: Totontepec landscape; new Plectrohyla species, Ixalotriton niger, Concepción Pápalo, Thorius minutissimus, Craugastor pozo (panels, left to right) Back cover photograph: Collecting in Chamula, Chiapas Photo credits: The cover photographs were taken by the authors under grant agreements with the two main project funders: NGS and CEPF.
    [Show full text]
  • Michele Walters Robert J. Scholes Editors
    Michele Walters Robert J. Scholes Editors The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks Michele Walters • Robert J. Scholes Editors The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks Editors Michele Walters Robert J. Scholes Natural Resources and Environment Global Change and Sustainability Research Council for Scientific and Industrial Institute Research (CSIR) University of the Witwatersrand Pretoria Johannesburg South Africa South Africa and Centre for Wildlife Management University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa Additional material to this book can be downloaded from http://extras.springer.com. ISBN 978-3-319-27286-3 ISBN 978-3-319-27288-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27288-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016951648 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017. This book is published open access. Open Access This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the work’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers of Change in Ecosystem Condition and Services
    Chapter 7 Drivers of Change in Ecosystem Condition and Services Coordinating Lead Author: Gerald C. Nelson Lead Authors: Elena Bennett, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, Kenneth G. Cassman, Ruth DeFries, Thomas Dietz, Andrew Dobson, Achim Dobermann, Anthony Janetos, Marc Levy, Diana Marco, Nebojsa Nakic´enovic´, Brian O’Neill, Richard Norgaard, Gerhard Petschel-Held, Dennis Ojima, Prabhu Pingali, Robert Watson, Monika Zurek Review Editors: Agnes Rola, Ortwin Renn, Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle Main Messages . ............................................ 175 7.1 Introduction ........................................... 175 7.2 Indirect Drivers ........................................ 176 7.2.1 Demographic Drivers 7.2.2 Economic Drivers: Consumption, Production, and Globalization 7.2.3 Sociopolitical Drivers 7.2.4 Cultural and Religious Drivers 7.2.5 Science and Technology Drivers 7.3 Direct Drivers . ........................................ 199 7.3.1 Climate Variability and Change 7.3.2 Plant Nutrient Use 7.3.3 Land Conversion 7.3.4 Biological Invasions and Diseases 7.4 Examples of Interactions among Drivers and Ecosystems ......... 212 7.4.1 Land Use Change 7.4.2 Tourism 7.5 Concluding Remarks .................................... 214 NOTES ................................................... 214 REFERENCES .............................................. 214 173 ................. 11411$ $CH7 10-27-05 08:42:07 PS PAGE 173 174 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Scenarios BOXES 7.16 Trends in Global Consumption of Nitrogen Fertilizers, 7.1 War as a Driver of Change
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Better Futures Using the Seeds Approach
    Volume 5: 04 March 2021 https://socialinnovationsjournal.com/index.php/sij/article/view/694 Imagining better futures using the Seeds approach Laura M. Pereira1 1Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University; and Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University Corresponding author: Laura M. Pereira, [email protected] Abstract Building capacities to anticipate potential futures that could unfold can help us to make better decisions in the present. However, imagining the future is not easy. To address this gap, the Seeds of Good Anthropocenes (Seeds) project has been designed to use innovative methods to undertake novel participatory processes to co-design desirable visions of the future and identify pathways of what needs to be done to get there. A core innovation of the Seeds project has been the development of an adapted Mānoa method scenarios process for envisioning more desirable futures. It has been used in a workshop with diverse people to envisions more desirable futures for specific places such as southern Africa, and northern Europe and the Canadian Arctic as well as for specific thematic areas like biodiversity and geo-engineering. The approach has been used in a variety of intergovernmental processes and has recently been adapted to take place online. Keywords: Manoa method, potential futures, Seeds approach, sustainability, social innovation Introduction Times of rapid disruption create novel opportunities for change; this reminds us that the future is uncertain and that big changes are possible over short timeframes (Wyborn et al. 2020). Building capacities to anticipate potential futures that could unfold can help us to make better decisions in the present (Vervoort and Gupta 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity, Scientists, and Religious Communities: Conservation Through Collaboration 10 March 2016 Christine A
    MENU (/) Read More News Stories (/news) Biodiversity, Scientists, and Religious Communities: Conservation Through Collaboration 10 March 2016 Christine A. Scheller (/person/christine-scheller) Tweet (https://www.reddit.com/submit) CENTER OF SCIENCE, POLICY AND SOCIETY PROGRAMS (/TOPICS/CENTER-SCIENCE-POLICY-AND-SOCIETY- PROGRAMS) DIALOGUE ON SCIENCE, ETHICS, AND RELIGION (/TOPICS/DIALOGUE-SCIENCE-ETHICS-AND-RELIGION) BIODIVERSITY, SCIENTISTS, AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES: CONSERVATION THROUGH COLLABORATION|AAAS Speaker(s) Time Se Kim 00:00-10:01 Karen Lips 10:02-31:07 Peyton West 31:08-50:04 William Brown 50:05-109:17 Panel Discussion 109:18-1:29:59 Audience Q&A 1:30:00-1:31:55 Religious communities are too often an underutilized resource in protecting Earth’s most vulnerable ecosystems, speakers said at a DoSER-sponsored AAAS Annual Meeting symposium (https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2016/webprogram/Session12428.html) on February 13. Conservation biologist Karen Lips (http://biology.umd.edu/karen-lips.html) and wildlife ecologist Peyton West (https://www.linkedin.com/in/peyton-west-bb52754a) outlined the extent of the worldwide ecological crisis and the potential for collaboration between conservationists and religious communities, while theologian William Brown made a scriptural case for such efforts and environmental journalist Daniel Grossman moderated the discussion. Lips, Director of Graduate Program in Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology at the University of Maryland, College Park, drew upon the troubling story of worldwide amphibian decline to make her points while West, Executive Director of the Frankfurt Zoological Society-U.S. (and former DoSER project director), discussed how her conservation efforts in Africa and South East Asia are impacted for both good and ill by religious communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus Zeteki, A. Varius): a Conservation Planning Workshop
    The Golden Frogs of Panama The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): varius) A Conservation Planning Workshop A Conservation Planning Workshop 19-22 November 2013 El Valle, Panama The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): A Conservation Planning Workshop 19 – 22 November, 2013 El Valle, Panama FINAL REPORT Workshop Conveners: Project Golden Frog Association of Zoos and Aquariums Golden Frog Species Survival Plan Panama Amphibian Rescue and Conservation Project Workshop Hosts: El Valle Amphibian Conservation Center Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Workshop Design and Facilitation: IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Workshop Support: The Shared Earth Foundation An Anonymous Frog-Friendly Foundation Photos courtesy of Brian Gratwicke (SCBI) and Phil Miller (CBSG). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, in collaboration with Project Golden Frog, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums Golden Frog Species Survival Plan, the Panama Amphibian Rescue and Conservation Project, the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, and workshop participants. This workshop was conceived and designed by the workshop organization committee: Kevin Barrett (Maryland Zoo), Brian Gratwicke (SCBI), Roberto Ibañez (STRI), Phil Miller (CBSG), Vicky Poole (Ft. Worth Zoo), Heidi Ross (EVACC), Cori Richards-Zawacki (Tulane University), and Kevin Zippel (Amphibian Ark). Workshop support provided by The Shared Earth Foundation and an anonymous frog-friendly foundation. Estrada, A., B. Gratwicke, A. Benedetti, G. DellaTogna, D. Garrelle, E. Griffith, R. Ibañez, S. Ryan, and P.S. Miller (Eds.). 2014. The Golden Frogs of Panama (Atelopus zeteki, A. varius): A Conservation Planning Workshop. Final Report. Apple Valley, MN: IUSN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Sustainability of the Anthropocene Technosphere Imply an Existential Risk for Our Species? Thinking with Peter Haff
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Does the Sustainability of the Anthropocene Technosphere Imply an Existential Risk for Our Species? Thinking with Peter Haff João Ribeiro Mendes 1,2 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; [email protected] 2 Institute for Anthropocene Studies, 4715-572 Braga, Portugal Abstract: Throughout the 20th century, several thinkers noticed that Technology was becoming a global phenomenon. More recently, US geologist Peter Haff claimed that a Technosphere is now in place and can be conceived as a new Earth geological system. This unprecedented situation is creating enormous challenges not only for our species, since more and more of its members are now dependent on the subsistence of this man-made sphere, but also for other species and natural ecosystems that have become increasingly dependent on it. Perhaps the most crucial of these challenges is the sustainability of the Technosphere itself. In the first part of the article, I attempted a critical reconstruction of Haff’s Technosphere concept. The second part is dedicated to analyzing how the unsustainability of the Technosphere represents a global catastrophic risk and ultimately an existential risk. Keywords: technosphere; anthropocene; Peter Haff; sustainability; existential risk Citation: Mendes, João Ribeiro. 2021. Does the Sustainability of the Anthropocene Technosphere Imply an Existential Risk for Our Species? Thinking with Peter Haff. Social 1. Introduction Sciences 10: 314. https://doi.org/ At the beginning of The Decay of Lying, in a scene set in the library of a country house 10.3390/socsci10080314 in Nottinghamshire, Cyril—the pro-naturalist—says to Vivian—the anti-naturalist: If Nature had been comfortable, mankind would never have invented architec- Academic Editors: ture, and I prefer houses to the open air.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgill Sustainability Project Fund Application
    Montréal à Votre Service…Écologique 1 McGill Sustainability Project Fund Application Project Title: Montréal à Votre Service…Écologique Budget Requested: $30,130 Applicant/Project Leaders: Dr. Elena Bennett Agricultural & Environmental Sciences - Dept. Natural Resource Sciences [email protected] (514) 398-7563 Matthew Mitchell, Ph.D. Candidate Agricultural & Environmental Sciences - Dept. Natural Resource Sciences [email protected] (514) 978-3531 Project Team: 1. Karine Dancose, Communications Officer - Biodiversity, Connectivity & Ecosystem Services in the Monteregie, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 2. Maria Felipe Lucia, PhD Student, Ciencias Ambientales y Restauración Ecológica - Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Spain, [email protected] 3. Barbara Frei, PhD Student, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 4. Hsin-Hui Huang, Data Manager & GIS Technician, Bioresource Engineering, [email protected] 5. Aerin Jacob, PhD Student, Biology, [email protected] 6. Purity Karuga, PhD Student, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 7. Dorothy Maguire, PhD Student, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 8. Geneviève Metson, PhD, Student, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 9. Dr. Delphine Renard, Post-doctoral Researcher, Geography, [email protected] 10. Dr. Marta Terrado Casanovas, Post-doctoral Researcher, Natural Resource Sciences, [email protected] 11. Carly Ziter, MSc Student, Biology, [email protected] Montréal à Votre Service…Écologique 2 I. Project Overview Like cities and people everywhere, McGill and Montreal rely on ecosystem services – the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. These include food, energy, clean air and water, climate regulation, places for recreation, and cultural inspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Society Support for Scientists Working to Build Institutional
    Scientific society support for scientists working to build institutional capacity for public engagement: Examples from the AAAS Leshner Leadership Institute PA13D-0886 Public engagement and institutional change Building institutional capacity for public engagement Progress on institutional change Because science is prevalent in all facets of our lives, the science-society In 2017, AAAS Leshner Fellow Sheena Cruickshank introduced the UK National Co- All of the AAAS Leshner AAAS Leshner Fellows’ Progress on Institutional Change relationship is complex, and there are many ways to approach it. Interactions ordinating Centre for Public Engagement’s EDGE Tool as a framework that AAAS Fellows who responded – (n=22 projects) between interested stakeholders are critical to finding common ground on Leshner Fellows might use to assess institutional support for public engagement. both those in the current Ongoing but progressing more scientific issues affecting society. Public engagement can provide a constructive The tool identifies nine areas where institutional support for public engagement is cohort and those in slowly than planned (2) platform for such dialogue, focusing on intentional, meaningful interactions that critical; AAAS Leshner Fellows identify goals and actions for institutional change in previous cohorts – are provide opportunities for mutual learning between scientists and members of the one or more of these areas. actively working on Ongoing and headed in a Stalled (1) public. Goals for public engagement include civic engagement skills and institutional change. Most positive direction (16) Purpose Processes People of the projects they empowerment, increased awareness of the cultural relevance of science, and Still in early stages (3) recognition of the importance of multiple perspectives and domains of Does your institution have a Does your institution invest How effectively are people reported on are headed in knowledge to scientific endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2016 Annual Report
    AnnualReport 2015-2016 University of California, Santa Barbara 1 Table of Contents Director’s Statement 1 NCEAS Mission Statement ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 The People of NCEAS 4 Organizational Chart 5 Principal Investigators �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 NCEAS Scientists 7 NCEAS Science Advisers 9 SNAPP Science Advisory Council �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9 SNAPP Board 10 SNAPP Management Team ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Students ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 NCEAS Programs & Working Groups 12 Long Term Ecological Research Network Communications Office �������������������������������������������������13 SNAPP: Science for Nature �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Dissertation
    ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF PANAMANIAN GOLDEN FROGS by Corinne L. Richards A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor Laura Lacey Knowles, Co-Chair Professor Ronald A. Nussbaum, Co-Chair Associate Professor Mercedes Pascual Assistant Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Kevin C. Zippel, World Conservation Union Nature's first green is gold Her hardest hue to hold. Her early leaf's a flower; But only so an hour. Then leaf subsides to leaf. So Eden sank to grief, So dawn goes down to day. Nothing gold can stay. - Robert Frost © Corinne L. Richards All rights reserved 2008 To my Mom and Dad, who have always encouraged me following my dreams and to Geoff who is always game for an adventure. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people helped bring this research to completion, both physically and intellectually, and I am grateful to them all. First, and foremost, I would like to thank my advisors and co-chairs, Lacey Knowles and Ron Nussbaum for their guidance, feedback, and constructive criticism. I am especially grateful to Lacey for her friendship and the time and effort she has invested in shaping me into an independent scientific investigator. I would also like to thank the remainder of my dissertation committee, Johannes Foufopoulos, Mercedes Pascual, and Kevin Zippel for their help and encouragement throughout. I am grateful to Amanda Zellmer, Tim Connallon, Elen Oneal, Huateng Huang, Bryan Carstens, Heather Adams, and Wendy Grus for their daily help, feedback, friendship and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Six Dimensions of Collective Leadership That Advance Sustainability Objectives: Rethinking What It Means to Be an Academic Leader
    Copyright © 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Caviglia-Harris, J., K. E. Hodges, B. Helmuth, E. M. Bennett, K. Galvin, M. Krebs, K. Lips, M. Lowman, L. A. Schulte, and E. A. G. Schuur. 2021. The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader. Ecology and Society 26(3):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12396-260309 Insight The six dimensions of collective leadership that advance sustainability objectives: rethinking what it means to be an academic leader Jill Caviglia-Harris 1, Karen E. Hodges 2, Brian Helmuth 3, Elena M. Bennett 4, Kathleen Galvin 5, Margaret Krebs 6,7, Karen Lips 8, Meg Lowman 9,10, Lisa A. Schulte 11 and Edward A. G. Schuur 12 ABSTRACT. Solutions to our most pressing environmental problems demand the development and application of leadership skills that are not typically fostered in traditional academic programs: skills that advance new transdisciplinary approaches to co-produce knowledge that can be mobilized for action. We outline a new collective leadership model with six dimensions, Inquire, Connect, Engage, Strategize, Empower, and Reflect, and show through a series of case studies how each of these leadership dimensions can be used to create positive and lasting change for people and their environments. We also describe how academic researchers can learn to apply these dimensions in their own work and introduce a series of companion online narratives and teaching resources designed to facilitate
    [Show full text]