Course Syllabus for CDS 300 (3.0 Semester Credit Hour Course)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Course Syllabus for CDS 300 (3.0 Semester Credit Hour Course) 1 Course Syllabus for CDS 300 (3.0 semester credit hour course): Phonetics Program: Communication Disorders and Sciences (CDS); Department: Rehabilitation Institute (RI); College: College of Education and Human Services (COEHS) Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901 Fall 2013 Bring this syllabus to each class Instructor: Laura Chandler, MS/CCC-SLP Phone: 453-8262 (CDS office: support staff: Sheila Dingrando) E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays after class until 9:45 am and Friday afternoons by appointment. If emailing a request for an appointment, please suggest at least two possible times that you could meet. Class meeting days, times & location: Tuesdays and Thursdays 8:00am-9:15am Undergraduate Catalogue Description: 3 semester credit hours. Instruction in the use of phonetic symbols to record the speech sounds of midland American English, with the emphasis on ear training, and a description of place and manner of production of these sounds. Bibliography:Required Materials: Small, L. H. (2012). Fundamentals of Phonetics: A Practical Guide for Students (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN-10: 0132582104 | ISBN-13: 9780132582100 Course Objectives: Upon completion of this course each student will be able to: 1. Explain how they learn about/use phonetics. (RBT*: metacogniton/ understanding) 2. Transcribe spoken language (speech sounds, words, phrases, and connected speech) accurately using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). (RBT: Procedure/Apply) 3. Analyze how speech sounds fit in the broader areas of communication: speaking, writing, listening, and reading. (RBT: Conceptual/Analyze) 4. Comprehend, define and use terms related to phonetic nomenclature. (RBT: Factual/Remember) 5. Classify the sounds of Standard American English into phonetic properties. (RBT: Procedural/Understanding) 6. Analyze variations of Standard American English phonemes, allophones, and suprasegmentals, that can impact dialect and pragmatic elements of communication (RBT: Conceptual/Analyze) 7. Evaluate his/her own and others’ abilities to make accurate perceptual discrimination of speech sounds. (RBT: Metacognition/evaluation) *RBT=Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: knowledge/cognitive level) Introduction: This course is required as partial fulfillment of the B.S. degree in Communication Disorders and Sciences. The material covered in this course is necessary as a prerequisite to advanced courses in the study of speech-language pathology and audiology. Knowledge of the sound system of Standard American English, and development of transcription skills in the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) prepares students for the study of normal and disordered speech, language and hearing. This course is intended for undergraduate students who are beginning the CDS program as well as students from other disciplines. Punctuality: Class begins promptly at 8:00 and ends promptly at 9:15 a.m. The instructor expects students to attend the entire class period. File: 300 Syllabus [yr] MRV: 8/21/13 2 Classroom Social Behavior: The instructor expects the following student behaviors: use of computers or other electronic media for class-related purposes only, specifically no texting or phone calls in class. Turn off cell phones during class unless call reception is critical (inform instructor ahead of time if this is the case & sit by an exit so you can leave with limited disturbance to others). The instructor also expects students to refrain from disrupting behaviors such as talking to others in class when instructor is lecturing or when another student has been called upon to speak in class. Method of Instruction: Discussion/Lecture/Activities/Video/Audio. This course will address production and perception of speech sounds. Practice, in class and in homework, will increase transcription skills. Course Requirements 1. Class attendance is required and attendance will be taken. Attendance is critical because the course contents calls for practice and repetition, which will be addressed in class. Students who arrive after attendance has been taken will be considered absent for attendance purposes; students who fail to sign the attendance sheet will also be considered absent. There is one point given for attendance for each class. This is incentive to come to class. There are no excused absences. You do not need to explain your absences. The point will not be received if absent. 2. Complete all readings and assignments on time. The instructor lectures based on the assumption that all students have read the material and completed assignments beforehand. Quizzes and exams are based on readings, assignments, and in-class presentations/ materials. 3. Complete in-class quizzes; some quizzes will be announced prior to the date of the quiz, while some will not be announced beforehand. Quizzes may be administered at any time during a class session. Students who miss a quiz because they are not in class when it is administered will not be allowed to take the quiz at any other time and will receive a score of ‘0’ (zero) for the missed quiz, unless arrangements are made otherwise. 4. Complete regular examinations, which will be based on readings, assignments, and in-class presentations/materials, and will occur about every 5 weeks. Exact dates for each examination will be announced in class at least one week prior to the examination date. Students may not take a test at any time other than at the announced time and date. The material covered by each examination is provided below the course schedule. 5. Completion of one final comprehensive examination. The final is worth the same number of points as each regular exam. Only students who do not complete all regular examinations will be required to take the final examination. Furthermore, students who do complete the three regular examinations may elect to take the final examination, in which case the grade of the final examination will be substituted for the lowest of the other regular examination grades. In the event that the grade on the final is lower than the lowest of the other three grades then the final will not be substituted for any of the regular examinations. 6. Academic Honesty: There will be a zero tolerance for plagiarism or academic dishonesty. Any student determined to have been cheating, plagiarizing or otherwise submitting someone else’s work as their own will receive a grade of “0” for that assignment. A second incident will result in an “F” for the course and a referral to appropriate academic review. The instructor expects students to comply with University policies. Policies pertaining to student conduct are printed in the SIUC Bulletin and Undergraduate Catalog. Students may wish to review specifically the information in the Bulletin on Human Subjects and the Student Conduct Code (especially Acts of Academic Dishonesty). Some of the primary means of academic dishonesty include: File: 300 Syllabus [yr] MRV: 8/21/13 3 •Cheating - Getting unauthorized help on an assignment, quiz, or examination. (a) You must not receive from any other student or give to any other student any information, answers, or help during an exam. (b) You must not use unauthorized sources for answers during an exam. You must not take notes or books to the exam when such aids are forbidden, and you must not refer to any book or notes while you are taking the exam unless the instructor indicates it is an "open book" exam. (c) You must not obtain exam questions illegally before an exam or tamper with an exam after it has been corrected. •Plagiarism - Submitting work as your own that is someone else's. For example, plagiarism means copying material from a book or other source without acknowledging that the words or ideas are someone else's and not your own. If you copy an author's words exactly, treat the passage as a direct quotation and supply the appropriate citation. If you use someone else's ideas, even if you paraphrase the wording, appropriate credit should be given. You have committed plagiarism if you purchase a term paper or submit a paper as your own that you did not write. •Self Plagiarism - The submission of the same work for academic credit more than once without permission of the course instructor. •Fabrication - The falsification of data, information, or citations in any formal academic exercise. •Deception - Providing false information to an instructor concerning a formal academic exercise, e.g. giving a false excuse for missing a deadline or falsely claiming to have submitted work. •Sabotage - Acting to prevent others from completing their work. This includes cutting pages out of library books or willfully disrupting the experiments of others. 7. Bring a small mirror to class each day. Notes: A. If academic adjustments or services are required by a student with an impairment/ disability, please inform the professor or contact the Disability Support Service Office at Woody Hall B-150 (453-5738). B. Students who need assistance with writing skills can contact the SIUC Writing Centers. The service is free to SIUC students; their email address is [email protected], their website address is www.siu.edu/~write C. This class is a preparatory class for the professions of audiology and speech-language pathology. The skills of discussion and oral presentation are critical skills in your future professional experience. Participation in class is important. Remember that future recommendation letters may include description of professional behaviors observed in course work. Such behaviors might include collaboration, participation, inquiry, critical thinking, creativity, peer interactions, faculty interactions, timeliness, attendance, research curiosity, conceptual application in class response, writing language performance (grammar, organization, cohesion, diverse syntax), oral language performance, grades, and rank in class. D. Emergency Procedures: Southern Illinois University Carbondale is committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for study and work. Because some health and safety circumstances are beyond our control, we ask that you become familiar with the SIUC Emergency Response Plan and Building Emergency Response Team (BERT) program.
Recommended publications
  • Prevocalic T-Glottaling Across Word Boundaries in Midland American
    hon la Laboratory Phonology Kaźmierski, K. 2020 Prevocalic t-glottaling across word boundaries lab Journal of the Association for in Midland American English. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of Laboratory Phonology phon the Association for Laboratory Phonology 11(1): 13, pp. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.271 JOURNAL ARTICLE Prevocalic t-glottaling across word boundaries in Midland American English Kamil Kaźmierski Department of Contemporary English Language, Faculty of English at Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, PL [email protected] Rates of t-glottaling across word boundaries in both preconsonantal and prevocalic contexts have recently been claimed to be positively correlated with the frequency of occurrence of a given word in preconsonantal contexts (Eddington & Channer, 2010). Words typically followed by consonants have been argued to have their final /t/s glottaled more often than words less frequently followed by consonants. This paper includes a number of ‘internal’ and ‘external’ predictors in a mixed-effects logistic regression model and has two goals: (1) to replicate the positive correlation of the frequency of occurrence of a word in preconsonantal contexts (its ‘contextual frequency’) with its rates of t-glottaling in both preconsonantal and prevocalic contexts postulated by Eddington and Channer (2010), and (2) to quantify the factors influencing the likelihood of t-glottaling across word boundaries in Midland American English. The effect of contextual frequency has been confirmed. This result is argued to support a hybrid view of phonological storage and processing, one including both abstract and exemplar representations. T-glottaling has also been found to be negatively correlated with bigram frequency and speech rate deviation, while positively correlated with young age in female speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Pardubice Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Commented
    University of Pardubice Faculty of Arts and Philosophy Commented Translation of a Specialized Text Tomáš Šaroun Bachelor Thesis 2019 Prohlašuji: Tuto práci jsem vypracoval samostatně. Veškeré literární prameny a informace, které jsem v práci využil, jsou uvedeny v seznamu použité literatury. Byl jsem seznámen s tím, že se na moji práci vztahují práva a povinnosti vyplývající ze zákona č.121/2000Sb., autorský zákon, zejména se skutečností, že Univerzita Pardubice má právo na uzavření licenční smlouvy o užití této práce jako školního díla podle § 60 odst. 1 autorského zákona, a s tím, že pokud dojde k užití této práce mnou nebo bude poskytnuta licence o užití jinému subjektu, je Univerzita Pardubice oprávněna ode mne požadovat přiměřený příspěvek na úhradu nákladů, které na vytvoření díla vynaložila, a to podle okolností až do jejich skutečné výše. Beru na vědomí, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb., o vysokých školách a o změně a doplnění dalších zákonů (zákon o vysokých školách), ve znění pozdějších předpisů, a směrnicí Univerzity Pardubice č. 9/2012, bude práce zveřejněna v Univerzitní knihovně a prostřednictvím Digitální knihovny Univerzity Pardubice. V Pardubicích dne 17. 06. 2019 Tomáš Šaroun Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Mgr. Eva Nováková for her valuable advice, guidance, and patience. Additionally, I would like to thank my dear and loving family for continuous support and encouragement throughout my studies. ANNOTATION This bachelor thesis deals with various aspects of translating specialized texts from English to Czech. The first chapter contains definitions of stylistics and offers two points of view on the topic as are differently perceived by English and Czech scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Dimensions of the Vowel Space in Patients with Schizophrenia and Controls
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2021 Quantifying Dimensions of the Vowel Space in Patients with Schizophrenia and Controls Elizabeth Maneval Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Phonetics and Phonology Commons Recommended Citation Maneval, Elizabeth, "Quantifying Dimensions of the Vowel Space in Patients with Schizophrenia and Controls" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1660. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1660 This Honors Thesis -- Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Acknowledgements I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to my advisor, Anya Hogoboom, for her patience, insight, and unwavering support during every step of this project. Without her constant encouragement, I never would have completed this thesis. Thanks to Kate Harrigan for her assistance in conceptualizing approaches for analyzing the data. Thanks to Jacob Adams for his tireless work on troubleshooting with the coding involved in FAVE to make this project a reality. Thanks to the William & Mary Linguistics Research Group for their supportive and constructive feedback and ideas as this project progressed. Additional thanks to my family and friends for their grounding support and input on the various iterations of this project. Abstract The speech of patients with schizophrenia has been characterized as being aprosodic, or lacking pitch variation. Recent research on linguistic aspects of schizophrenia has looked at the vowel space to determine if there is some correlation between acoustic aspects of speech and patient status (Compton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra Departament De Traducció I
    Universitat Pompeu Fabra Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge Programa Oficial de Doctorat Pluricentric dubbing in French and Spanish The translation of linguistic variation and prefabricated orality in films Presentat per Pascale Trencia Supervisió del projecte per Dra. Victòria Alsina, Dra. Jenny Brumme i Dra. Kristin Reinke Barcelona, setembre de 2019 Dedicatòria i Agraïments A mis padres, Guy y Lise, a mi hermana Marion, a Guillermo, a mis directoras, Vicky, Jenny y Kristin, y a todos los que han cruzado mi camino durante estos cincos años de estudios doctorales. Esta tesis lleva un poco de cada uno de vosotros. Resum El present estudi examina com es tradueix el discurs fílmic, especialment els elements marcadors de la variació lingüística, al francès i al castellà, dues llengües pluricèntriques, és a dir, llengües que tenen més d’un centre normatiu. El fet que diverses nacions adoptin mesures per promoure la indústria nacional del doblatge, en general per motius econòmics i culturals, en ocasions porta a duplicar les varietats de doblatge. Per tant, una qüestió clau és saber com es comparen aquestes versions doblades i com aconsegueixen transmetre la variació lingüística i la oralitat prefabricada a través de les seves respectives traduccions. L’objectiu d’aquesta investigació consisteix a examinar quines són les principals diferències i similituds entre el discurs fílmic doblat de Quebec i de França (per al francés) i d’Espanya i Amèrica Llatina (per a l’espanyol), sobre la base d’un estudi de la pel·lícula Death Proof (2007) de Quentin Tarantino. Aquesta pel·lícula va ser seleccionada pel seu alt nivell de variació lingüística i la importància que Tarantino dóna a la llengua (no estàndard) de les seves pel·lícules.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Iowa Test of Consonant Perception 1 2 3 Validation of The
    1 1 The Iowa Test of Consonant Perception 2 3 4 Validation of the Iowa Test of Consonant Perception 5 Jason Geller1, Ann Holmes1, Adam Schwalje2, Joel I Berger3, Phillip E Gander3, Inyong Choi4, 6 Bob McMurray1 7 1 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, G60 Psychological and 8 Brain Sciences Building, Iowa City, IA 52242 9 2 Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins 10 Drive, 21151 Pomerantz Family Pavilion, Iowa City, IA 52242 11 3 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, 1800 John Pappajohn 12 Pavilion, Iowa City, IA 52242 13 4 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Wendell Johnson 14 Speech and Hearing Center, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 15 16 Corresponding Author 17 Jason Geller 18 Center for Cognitive Science 19 152 Frelinghuysen Road 20 Busch Campus 21 Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 22 [email protected] 23 24 The Iowa Test of Consonant Perception 2 25 Abstract 26 Speech perception (especially in background noise) is a critical problem for hearing-impaired 27 listeners, and an important issue for cognitive hearing science. Despite a plethora of standardized 28 measures, few single-word closed-set tests uniformly sample the most frequently used phonemes 29 and use response choices that equally sample phonetic features like place and voicing. The Iowa 30 Test of Consonant Perception (ITCP) attempts to solve this. It is a proportionally balanced 31 phonemic word recognition task designed to assess perception of the initial consonant of 32 monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words.
    [Show full text]
  • 1967-1969 Southern Illinois University Bulletin Edwardsville Campus (Undergraduate Catalog) Southern Illinois University Carbondale
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC SIU Bulletins and Course Catalogs University Archives 1967 1967-1969 Southern Illinois University Bulletin Edwardsville Campus (Undergraduate Catalog) Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ua_bcc Recommended Citation , . "1967-1969 Southern Illinois University Bulletin Edwardsville Campus (Undergraduate Catalog)." (Jan 1967). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Archives at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in SIU Bulletins and Course Catalogs by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. One Dollar Southern Illinois University 1967/1969 Undergraduate Catalog Edwardsville Campus OBJECTIVES OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY TO EXALT BEAUTY In God, in nature, and in art; Teaching how to love the best but to keep the human touch; TO ADVANCE LEARNING In all lines of truth wherever they may lead, Showing how to think rather than what to think, Assisting the powers of the mind In their self-development; TO FORWARD IDEAS AND IDEALS In our democracy, Inspiring respect for others as for ourselves, Ever promoting freedom with responsibility; TO BECOME A CENTER OF ORDER AND LIGHT That knowledge may lead to understanding And understanding to wisdom. Southern Illinois University Bulletin 967/1969 Undergraduate Catalog Idwardsville Campus SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY BULLETIN / Vol. 9. No. 11. -^ttt\ September. 1967. Second-elass postage paid at Carbondale. Illinois 62901. ^i Published by Southern Illinois University. Carbondale. Illinois 62901. monthly except March and April, when published semi-monthly. This Issue of the Southern Illinois Univer- sity Bulletin covers in detail questions concerning the under- graduate program and applies to the Edwardsville Campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol11-05 Chad Hall Article
    The Perception of the Vowel Continuum in British and US English Speakers Chad Hall Michigan State University (USA) Abstract In this paper, the perception of the /æ/-/ɛ/ vowel continuum was analysed in British and United States English speakers by testing their word identification across the pan-pen continuum. A clear difference was found between the two speaker groups, with the U.S. speakers continuing to perceive ‘pan’ beyond the British speakers, presumably due to /æ/-tensing in U.S. dialects, particularly before nasal codas. It was found that the amount of /æ/-tensing across phonetic environments in a U.S. speaker’s dialect as well as their exposure to British English affected how they perceived the continuum. The results prove Bell-Berti’s (1979) argument that speech production and perception are closely related, and the steep drop in perception from ‘pan’ to ‘pen’ displayed by both speaker groups may prove that vowel perception is categorical, in contrast to popular opinion, though a discrimination task would have to be run before any reliable claim can be made. Keywords: Vowels, Perception, U.S. English, British English, Sociolinguistics, Sociophonetics, Dialectology Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, Vol 11–12. Papers from LAEL PG 2016–2017 Edited by Márton Petykó, Olena Rossi, and Shuo Yu © 2018 by the author 76 Chad Hall 1. Introduction 1.1. British and United States English Short-a Pronunciation The production of short-a by British and United States speakers is one of the key linguistic features that differentiates the dialects of these two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Phonological Variants in Louisiana Speech
    REGIONAL PHONOLOGICAL VARIANTS IN LOUISIANA SPEECH By August Weston Rubrecht A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1971 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. F. G. Cassidy, Jr., director of the Dictionary of American Regional English, for permission to use the tape recordings on which this study is based, and I want to thank him and the Dictionary staff for doing what they could from such a distance to make the field work as pleasant as possible. I especially recall Mrs. Laura Ducker's cheering notes and letters, and Dr. James Hartman's consideration in assigning additional communities once those in Louisiana had been finished. The names of all those in Louisiana who helped make the field work easier and the field worker more comfortable would comprise a list too long to give here. It would include all my informants, not just those who made tapes, and all those who helped direct me to prospec- tive informants, together with many others whose hospitality I enjoyed. I am especially grateful to the William R. Van Ripers at LSU in Baton Rouge and to Miller Williams, Thomas Preston, and John Mosier and their families at Loyola in New Orleans for their hospitality and assistance. In the writing of the dissertation, I gratefully acknowledge the advice and suggestions of my chairman. Dr. John Algeo, who has helped me avoid or correct a great many errors, omissions, and infelicitous turns of phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Welsh English Dialect in Fiction
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses A History of the Welsh English Dialect in Fiction Jones, Benjamin A. How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Jones, Benjamin A. (2018) A History of the Welsh English Dialect in Fiction. Doctoral thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa44723 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ A history of the Welsh English dialect in fiction Benjamin Alexander Jones Submitted to Swansea University in fulfilment of the requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching
    Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching Volume 11. Papers from LAEL PG 2016 & 2017 Edited by Márton Petykó Olena Rossi Shuo Yu 2018 Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University Papers from LAEL PG 2016–17 Table of Contents Introduction to the Volume .............................................................................................. i Family Language Policies in Five Syrian Families in the UK ........................................ 1 Dina Abed Elkhalik Syllable Structure and Syllabification in Ammani Arabic ............................................ 19 Mohammed Nour Abu Guba Pronouns in Putin’s Public Discourse: Features and Peculiarities ................................ 56 Elena Afromeeva The Perception of the Vowel Continuum in British and US English Speakers ............. 76 Chad Hall Compiling Comparable Multimodal Corpora of Tourism Discourse ............................ 96 Ekaterina Ignatova Sunday Family Lunch: An Ethnographic Description ................................................ 115 Vasiliki Saloustrou Authors ........................................................................................................................ 137 Editors ......................................................................................................................... 139 Papers from LAEL PG 2016–17 Introduction to the Volume This volume includes research papers presented at the 11th and 12th International Postgraduate Conferences in Linguistics
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Free-Classification of American Dialects
    Free-classification of American dialects in three conditions: natural, monotonized, and low-pass filtered speech Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation “with research distinction” in Linguistics in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Erin Walpole The Ohio State University May 2017 Project Advisor: Professor Cynthia Clopper, Department of Linguistics 1 Abstract The dialects of American English have distinct features: these features include vowel shifts – the Northern Cities Chain Shift and the Southern Chain Shift (Labov, Ash, & Boberg 2006; Clopper, Pisoni, & deJong 2005) − and prosodic variation, including intonation and rhythm (Clopper & Smiljanic 2011, 2015). In the current study, I ran three conditions to test which prosodic cues listeners were using when classifying talkers by regional dialect. American English has six distinct dialects: Northern, Southern, Midland, Mid-Atlantic, Western, and New- England (Labov, Ash, & Boberg 2006). Participants listened to 60 talkers, 10 from each of the six regional American English dialects, and were asked to sort the talkers into groups by dialect using free-classification. All of the talkers read the same sentence, which was manipulated in two of the three conditions. The first condition left the talkers’ voices natural and un-manipulated. The second condition monotonized all of the talkers’ voices. The third condition ran all of the talkers’ voices through a low-pass filter, which removed everything above 400 Hz. Results indicated that all participants, regardless of condition, made about 9 groups of talkers on average. Results also revealed effects of condition and talker dialect on accuracy. For the condition accuracy, the monotonized condition had the most accurate groupings, while the low-pass filtered condition had the least accurate groupings.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3 Linguistic Variations of a Dialect
    THE UZBEK STATE UNIVERSITY OF WORLD LANGUAGES THE FIRST ENGLISH LANGUAGE FACULTY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Juraeva Nargiza Motivation teaching English vocabulary games to A2level students 5220100-Philology and teaching languages (The English language) for granting the bachelor’s degree QUALIFICATION PAPER “THE QUALIFICATION PAPER SCIENTIFIC ADVISORS: IS ADMITTED TO DEFENCE” Head of the Department of _______________Bakirova H English Phonetics and phonology “____” ____________2016 ____________M.Chutpulatov “____” ____________2016 Tashkent-2016 1 CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………….....3 Chapter I The theory of a dialect in Linguistics………………………………6 1.1 The brief history of the notion of a dialect…………………………………….6 1.2 Regional and Social varieties of American and British dialects…………...…12 1.3 Linguistic variations of a dialect……………………………………………...20 Chapter II Practical viewpoint on American and British dialects……………27 2.1Cockney as a London dialect…………………………………………………27 2.2 Grammatical characteristics of American and British dialects…………….…34 2.3 Lexical peculiarities of American and British dialects……………………….46 Chapter III Methodological points teaching dialects in EFL classes……..….56 3.1 Perspectives on teaching dialects in the classroom…………………………..56 3.2 Strategies and exercises teaching dialects in EFL classes……………………60 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..71 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..74 2 Introduction On December 10, 2012 President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov signed a decree
    [Show full text]