DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Pipeline Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Pipeline Report 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE REPORT 2019 OUR MANDATE Building Queensland is a statutory body providing independent, expert advice on major Hardcopy ISBN: 978-0-6484591-2-5 infrastructure. Established under the Building Queensland Act 2015, Building Queensland’s Online vision is to enhance infrastructure outcomes ISBN: 978-0-6484591-3-2 for Queensland. INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE REPORT AUGUST 2019 Working closely with Queensland Government ©Building Queensland, AUGUST 2019 agencies, including departments, government- owned corporations and statutory authorities, Disclaimer Building Queensland leads the development Building Queensland makes no representations or warranties as to the of detailed business cases for projects with an contents or accuracy of the information contained in this publication. estimated capital cost of $100 million or more and The material contained in this publication has been prepared only for assists with those between $50-$100 million. This the purpose of section 15 of theBuilding Queensland Act 2015. Some threshold is higher for road transport projects of the information contained in this publication has been provided to that do not incorporate a toll road, with Building Building Queensland by third parties and readers should not assume Queensland leading detailed business cases for that Building Queensland has verified the accuracy and completeness projects over $500 million. Where a toll road is of the information. It is not the purpose of this publication that it be included, Building Queensland’s $100 million used by any person as a source of verified information. threshold applies. Working across all asset classes This publication reflects information as at the time of release. None Building Queensland also provides advice in the of the information in this publication should be relied upon unless early stages of proposal development. and until those seeking to rely on it have independently verified the All infrastructure proposals led by Building accuracy and completeness of it. Queensland are developed under our Business Creative Commons Licence Case Development Framework. The framework This work is licensed under a Creative supports a consistent and rigorous approach to Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 proposal development. International Licence. You are free to copy, communicate and adapt this material as long as you attribute the work to Building Queensland. To assist the Queensland Government in To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ determining the projects that will best address licences/by/4.0 the state’s infrastructure priorities, Building Queensland develops the Infrastructure Pipeline Report. Our Infrastructure Pipeline Report provides transparency of key government proposals under development. Cover (left to right): Inner City South State Secondary College, Cairns Convention Centre, Princess Alexandra Hospital, school sports court, Somerset Dam and newly completed state school building (images courtesy of Department of Education, Queensland Health and Seqwater). CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................2 INFLUENCES .....................................................................................................3 INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE REPORT ...........................................................5 PART 1: UNFUNDED PROPOSALS — INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE ..........................7 SUMMARY OF PRIORITY PROPOSALS ...............................................................8 INFRASTRUCTURE PIPELINE OF PRIORITY PROPOSALS .............................9 WHAT’S CHANGED ........................................................................................10 PROPOSAL SUMMARIES .................................................................................13 BEYOND THE PIPELINE .................................................................................32 PART 2: FUNDED PROPOSALS — DETAILED BUSINESS CASES...............................35 Centenary Bridge FOREWORD The Queensland Government, with the support of Building business cases for new greenfield developments for Significant progress has been made in the Queensland, has been busy unpacking service needs Toowoomba Hospital and Bundaberg Hospital. development of Queensland infrastructure across the state and identifying opportunities for economic Building Queensland is also leading the development of proposals since our December 2018 report. growth. This analysis has led to the identification of new proposals in the pipeline. The introduction of these detailed business cases for our critical water supply assets to ensure they continue to function safely during extreme Over 70 per cent of proposals proposals has resulted in a greater balance of economic and social infrastructure—both of which are necessary for weather events. Engineering standards have changed since have progressed to further stages developing the Queensland economy and enhancing the many of our dams were built and the detailed business quality of life for all Queenslanders. cases for Somerset Dam and Paradise Dam will investigate of development. solutions to meet the latest guidelines on acceptable Queensland’s growing and ageing population, coupled with flood capacity. ageing infrastructure assets and increased risks of extreme weather are just some of the challenges being addressed With the recent amendments to the Building Queensland by the proposals in this report. Some of the proposals Act 2015, our Infrastructure Pipeline Report will now are in the early stages of development, while others are transition to an annual cycle. Building Queensland will well progressed building on the comprehensive planning continue to provide transparency of the state’s major undertaken by agencies. infrastructure proposals through our website and we remain firmly focused on achieving our goal of enhancing Recognising the need to meet the demands of a larger infrastructure outcomes for the state. population, various education and health proposals are in the pipeline. In addition to investigating various hospital expansions, Building Queensland is developing detailed Damian Gould Alan Millhouse Chief Executive Officer, Chair, Building Queensland Building Queensland Building Queensland » Infrastructure Pipeline Report » 2019 » 1 INTRODUCTION Building Queensland oversees the planning The breadth of our involvement in developing the state’s infrastructure proposals is captured in this report. Building for all major infrastructure proposals in Queensland has either led or assisted with the development » BEYOND THE PIPELINE Queensland. From the early stages of of many of these proposals. Proposals where Building Queensland has not been involved have been identified This Infrastructure Pipeline Report tracks proposal development right through to the through engagement with agencies and assessed for development of detailed business cases, inclusion in this report. proposals that have progressed out of Building Queensland works closely with The Infrastructure Pipeline Report has moved to an annual the infrastructure pipeline. See page 34 agencies to help government determine cycle to align with the Queensland Budget. This will for the status of these projects after ensure budget priorities and developments are captured. infrastructure priorities. This change in frequency has been implemented under government consideration. amendments to the Building Queensland Act 2015 which Ultimately, Building Queensland’s analysis also include a change in responsibilities for business case development. Building Queensland leads the development and advice inform the government’s final of detailed business cases for infrastructure projects with investment decisions for Queensland’s an estimated capital cost of $100 million or more. This major infrastructure projects. threshold is now higher for road transport projects that do not incorporate a toll road with Building Queensland leading $ those with a minimum capital cost of $500 million. Where a toll road is included, Building Queensland’s $100 million threshold applies. Building Queensland is also required to assist agencies in developing detailed business cases for infrastructure projects over $50 million. » 2 Building Queensland » Infrastructure Pipeline Report » 2019 Agencies identify service needs and opportunities, and Influences engage Building Queensland to assess and develop QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT infrastructure proposals. Building Queensland works collaboratively to develop effective solutions—these are INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTIVES The Queensland Government develops the not always new build infrastructure solutions. Building state’s infrastructure strategy. The State Queensland also considers opportunities to improve service Infrastructure Plan sets the framework performance through reform, better use and improvement to existing infrastructure. Building Queensland helps ensure the for planning and prioritising projects in vision for infrastructure is maintained through the planning Queensland. It influences corridor plans, and development of projects. improving prosperity and liveability state strategic infrastructure documents Building Queensland provides information to the Department such as strategic assessments for transport, of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning on the proposals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Published on DNRME Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
    Market Survey Report 2016 for Brisbane City Council 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Thursday, 25 October 2018 Published Disclosure 18-228 File A Page 1 of 109 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Published This publication has been compiledDisclosure by State Valuation Services , Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. 18-228 File A Page 2 of 109 Table of contents No table of contents entries found. 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Published Disclosure 18-228 File A Page 3 of 109 Brief Overview Local Authority Statistics Amount No. of Valuations 334,990 Existing Total Amount($) 189,283,243,153 New Total Amount($) 200,817,023,527 Overall Factor Change 1.061 No of Sales(all sectors) 17,018 Summary of Impacts Land Use No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Thuringowa
    its 0#4, Wdkri Xdor# of fhurrngoraa Published by Thuringowa City Council P.O. Box 86, Thuringowa Central Queensland, 4817 Published October, 2000 Copyright The City of Thuringowa This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to the Publishers. All rights reserved. ISBN: 0 9577 305 3 5 kk THE CITY of Centenary of Federation i HURINGOWA Queensland This publication is a project initiated and funded by the City of Thuringowa This project is financially assisted by the Queensland Government, through the Queensland Community Assistance Program of the Centenary of Federation Queensland Cover photograph: Ted Gleeson crossing the Bohle. Gleeson Collection, Thuringowa Conienis Forward 5 Setting the Scene 7 Making the Land 8 The First People 10 People from the Sea 12 James Morrill 15 Farmers 17 Taking the Land 20 A Port for Thuringowa 21 Travellers 23 Miners 25 The Great Northern Railway 28 Growth of a Community 30 Closer Settlement 32 Towns 34 Sugar 36 New Industries 39 Empires 43 We can be our country 45 Federation 46 War in Europe 48 Depression 51 War in the North 55 The Americans Arrive 57 Prosperous Times 63 A great city 65 Bibliography 69 Index 74 Photograph Index 78 gOrtvard To celebrate our nations Centenary, and the various Thuringowan communities' contribution to our sense of nation, this book was commissioned. Two previous council publications, Thuringowa Past and Present and It Was a Different Town have been modest, yet tantalising introductions to facets of our past.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    9. The slide towards uncertainty, 1969–1972 The Parliament resumed after a break of seven and a half months—a relatively long intermission but by no means unusual in those days. When an election was due in the new year (from March to June), it was common practice for the Parliament to adjourn in late November or early December (before Christmas) and to not reconvene for another six to eight months. This was the pattern followed throughout the 1940s to the mid-1950s and again from 1962 to 1972. The thirty-ninth Parliament would run from 5 August 1969 to 10 December 1971 (202 sitting days in the three-year term or 67 days a year) and not meet again before the May 1972 election. It was the last Parliament to meet with 78 members and, for the first time since winning government, the Coalition governed with a reduced majority. Under Nicklin, the Coalition’s majority had risen from nine in 1957 to 10 in 1960, to 14 in 1963 and 16 in 1966, but fell back to just 12 after the 1969 election—Bjelke-Petersen’s first electoral test as leader. With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear the 1969–72 Parliament was to become Labor’s high-water mark in its period in opposition, when for a few years it posed a credible challenge to the government. It was also a period when the Premier was at his most vulnerable politically—a condition deeply troubling to his own party colleagues, who would eventually be incited to rebel against his leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2017 | 2018 ©Building Queensland, August 2018 This annual report is licensed by the State of Queensland (Building Queensland) under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International Licence. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute the work to Building Queensland. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content from this annual report should be attributed as: Building Queensland Annual Report 2017–2018 ISSN: 2206-4435 (Print) ISSN: 2206-4443 (Online) Translating and interpreting assistance Building Queensland is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding the annual report, you can contact us on 07 3237 7500 between 9 am and 5 pm Monday to Friday (except for public holidays) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. This annual report provides information about Building Queensland’s financial and non-financial performance for 2017–2018. It has been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accountability Act 2009, the Building Queensland Act 2015 and the Financial and Performance Management Standard 2009. This report has been prepared for the Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning to submit to Parliament. It has also been prepared to meet the needs of stakeholders, including the Commonwealth and local governments, industry and business
    [Show full text]
  • Townsville Environmental Scan: Informing Region's Workforce Development Needs
    Townsville Environmental Scan Informing the region’s workforce development needs Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners of Country Jobs Queensland, on behalf of the community, pays respect to Elders past, present and emerging. Jobs Queensland recognises that the land, water and seascapes of the North Queensland region form traditional landscapes that were managed for thousands of years by Traditional Owners to provide the resources required for life. Although these landscapes have changed and are now shared, Traditional Owners have an ongoing and unique connection to their ancestral lands and have responsibilities to the land under their traditional law and customs. Jobs Queensland also recognises Traditional Owners who have been granted native title over land and sea country and their active role in the ongoing management of cultural resources for the important role they play in the social, spiritual and economic future of these communities. Copyright This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. Licence Unless otherwise indicated this work is licensed by Jobs Queensland under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 You are free to copy, communicate and adapt this publication, as long as you attribute it as follows: © The State of Queensland, Jobs Queensland, February 2019. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Services (TIS National) on telephone 131 450 and ask them to contact Jobs Queensland on (07) 3294 4706.
    [Show full text]
  • UQFL158 Karl Langer Papers
    FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid UQFL158 Karl Langer Papers Size 90 boxes, 2 parcels, approximately 1100 plans, 5 oversize folders (84 plans) Contents Architectural drawings, financial records, correspondence, biographical and personal notes, articles, speeches, job photos, subject files, diaries, journal and newspaper cuttings. Buildings which drawings and files relate to include St. Peters Lutheran College, Brisbane; Ipswich Girls Grammar School; Ipswich Boys Grammar School; Lennons Hotel, Brisbane and Lennons Hotel, Broadbeach. Biography Dr Langer graduated in Vienna as an architect from the master class of Peter Behrens. He migrated to Australia in 1939, and settled in Brisbane. He became a lecturer at the University of Queensland, and later also at what is now called the Queensland University of Technology. He was fellow of the Royal Australian Institute of Architects and of the Australian Planning Institute. He was also the first president of the Institute of Landscape Architecture, and an executive member of the National Trust. He designed many of Queensland's best-known buildings, including the chapel at St. Peter's Lutheran College in Brisbane. Notes Open access. Access to personal correspondence is restricted. Application to access restricted material may be submitted to the Fryer Librarian for consideration. Records in this collection are listed to folder level only. Related manuscript material is held at F3208 Records of the Langer Memorial Committee and UQFL157 Gertrude Langer Collection. Material in Box 44 has been rehoused into two boxes. Box 1 Blocksidge and Ferguson (5 folders) OTIS Elevator Co Box 2 Brisbane Crematorium (2 folders) Cochrane - Chelmer residence ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Last updated: 13/04/2021 © University of Queensland 1 FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid Condon - Katherine, NT Di Betta, Mr and Mrs J Box 3 Gorton Flats (Indoor) Grant Kedron Park Teachers Training College Canteen Lindsay-Smith, Mr L Marriage Guidance - work done Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1967
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 1967 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Sub Judice Matter [7 SEPTEMBER] Questions 411 THURSDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER, 1967 Mr. AIKENS: Mr. Speaker, I give notice that your ruling be disagreed with. If we are going to have solicitors writin~ to us and Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, telling us what to do, we mtght as well Murrumba) read prayers and took the chair disband. at 11 a.m. Mr. SPEAKER: Order! I point out to the hon. member that I have given reasons for SUB JUDICE MATTER my ruling. If he studies my ruling, he will MR. SPEAKER's RULING see what I refer to in it. Mr. SPEAKER: Hon. members, I have received the following letter from Messrs. Hawthorn, Cuppaidge & Badgery, Solicitors, QUESTIONS dated 5 September, 1967:- PRINTING OF EDUCATIONAL PUBLICATIONS "The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, IN HoNG KONG Parliament House, Mr. Houston, pursuant to notice, asked BRISBANE. The Minister for Education,- "Dear Sir, ( 1) What publications used in Queens­ "re A. T. Dewar v. Mirror Newspapers land State primary and secondary schools Limited are printed and bound in Hong Kong? "We are acting for the abovenamed Alexander Tattenhall Dewar, of Power (2) What is the name of the firm in Street, Wavell Heights, Member of the Hong Kong doing this work? Legislative Assembly of Queensland. ( 3) Is this firm associated with any "We are instructed to inform you that we Queensland firm and, if so, who are the have today issued a Writ out of the directors and shareholders of the local Supreme Court of Queensland, Brisbane, firm? on behalf of our Client against Mirror Newspapers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018–2019 ©Building Queensland, September 2019 This annual report is licensed by the State of Queensland (Building Queensland) under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International Licence. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute the work to Building Queensland. To view a copy of this licence, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content from this Annual Report should be attributed as: Building Queensland Annual Report 2018–19 ISSN: 2206-4435 (Print) ISSN: 2206-4443 (Online) Translating and interpreting assistance Building Queensland is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding the Annual Report, you can contact us on 07 3237 7500 between 9 am and 5 pm Monday to Friday (except for public holidays) and we will arrange for an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. This Annual Report provides information about Building Queensland’s financial and non-financial performance for 2018–19. It has been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accountability Act 2009, the Building Queensland Act 2015 and the Financial and Performance Management Standard 2009. This report has been prepared for the Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning to submit to Parliament. It has also been prepared to meet the needs of stakeholders, including the Commonwealth and local governments, industry and business associations, community groups and the public. Copies of this report are available in paper form and can be obtained from Building Queensland. Additional information is available online and on the Queensland Government open data website www.qld.gov.au/data Contact us Level 30, 12 Creek Street, Brisbane Qld 4000 [email protected] 07 3237 7500 www.buildingqueensland.qld.gov.au WR19/230 Contents Letter of compliance .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 JOHN WANNA AND TRACEY ARKLAY THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/qldparliament_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Ayes Have It: History of Queensland Parliament 1957-1989 / John Wanna and Tracey Arklay ISBN: 9781921666308 (pbk.) 9781921666315 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Politics, Australian Politics History of Australian politics, Queensland Parliament History from 1957 - 1989 Other Authors/Contributors: John Wanna and Tracey Arklay All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press All images supplied by the Queensland Parliamentary Library. Printed by Griffin Press. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . .vii 1 . Inside the Queensland Parliament . 1 Part I 2 . Parliament’s refusal of supply and defeat of Labor, 1957 . 29 3 . The early Nicklin years, 1957–1963 . 57 4 . Safely in the saddle: the Nicklin government, 1963–1968 . 87 5 . The Nicklin government’s legislative program . 125 6 . The oppositional parties in the Parliament, 1957–1968 . 167 7 . The Pizzey–Chalk interlude, 1968 . 203 Part II 8 .
    [Show full text]
  • J. R Kemp, the "Grand Pooh-Bah"
    THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Accepte—r-—d fo,wr, thi,,ce dwarawarda OoTf ^<^-^^-..<?L/i/^fi.i J. R KEMP, on.TH' E "GRAND POOH-BAH": A STUDY OF TECHNOCRACY AND STATE DEVELOPMENT IN QUEENSLAND, 1920 -1955 A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland Kay Cohen B. A.(Fr.),B. Soc.Stud.,M.A(Govt.) School of Political Science and International Studies University of Queensland Brisbane, Queensland March 2002 Statement of Originality The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and behef, original, except as acknowledged in the text. The material has not been submitted in whole or in part for a degree at this or any other University. Kay Teresa Cohen March, 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to many colleagues and friends for their patience and helpful advice during the long process of writing this thesis. Thanks also to the staff and members of various archives, Ubraries and associations for vviiom no request of mine was too much trouble, and departmental support staff and post-graduate students who were always cheerfully supportive. I owe a great deal to my supervisor. Dr. Paul Reynolds, for helping me realise a long- held ambition. His reassurances kept me going when I might have given in and given up. Finally, to my family, Jon, Samantha, Ben, Toby and Sally, I will always be grateful for your constant encouragement and loving support through what were difficult times for all of us. J. R. KEMP, THE "GRAND POOH-BAH": A STUDY OF TECHNOCRACY AND STATE DEVELOPMENT IN QUEENSLAND, 1920 -1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Department of Main Roads Building
    Project Profile Former Department of Main Roads Building Client Asian Pacific Group Location Spring Hill, Queensland Duration 18 weeks Contract Internal Demolition and Asbestos Removal Cost $2.35 Million Project Overview This Art Series Hotel is a refurbishment of the former Department of Main Roads registration and licensing building constructed in the 1960’s by architect Karl Langer and now heritage listed due to the limited examples of its type remaining in the Brisbane CBD. The hotel will eventually include a mix of short term accommodation and apartments sold to permanent residents/investors with the downstairs devoted to retail/café/office mix. 15 Stories required full internal strip out (primarily by hand): Removal of all furniture and fixtures Removal of ceilings Demolition of all internal walls and petitions and amenity (wet) areas Removal of services: air-conditioning ducting, pipework, cable trays and cables Demolition of loading dock area with rear roof structure attached to heritage wall Removal of floor coverings: carpets, carpet tiles, parquetry flooring Removal low density asbestos board Removal of friable asbestos pipe lagging Former Department of Main Roads Building | Page 1 Removal of asbestos bonded sheeting Removal of Asbestos vinyl tiles using a ride on floor stripper Demolition of external garden beds and tree removal Project planning was phased to maximize the crew deployment with friable and bonded asbestos removal working alongside demolition to progress program. A ride on floor stripper was purchased for the broad acre removal of asbestos flooring (13,000 square metres). Debris removal was manual and had to be reduced in size to fit into the lifts.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Factors Involved in Decisions on the Adoption of Computers to the Queensland Government and the Subsequent Initial Problems: 1956-1984
    A History of the Factors Involved in Decisions on the Adoption of Computers to the Queensland Government and the Subsequent Initial Problems: 1956-1984 Michael John Kelk Bachelor of Arts in Humanities Graduate Diploma of Arts (Library and Information Science) Applied Ethics Research Concentration School of Humanities, Queensland University of Technology Submitted in full requirement for the award of HH40 Master of Arts (Research) August 2001 Keywords 1 . Politics and Government - Queensland - History 2. Public Administration - Queensland - History 3. Technological Innovation - Queensland - History 4. Computers - Queensland - History 5. Information Systems - Adoption 6. Decision-making Abstract This thesis examines the introduction of computers into Queensland Government from the late 1950s. It examines the extent to which there was an awareness of the problems of information technology that emerged over the next forty years and in particular the decision-making processes and arguments that determined major outcomes. It reveals that many Government Departments were overloaded with paper-work bottlenecks and the coming of decimal currency posed a significant problem due to the mammoth task of currency conversion. These pressures, when combined with the increasing costs of labour, became the justification for the introduction of computers. The decision to introduce computers was considered an inevitable business decision that stemmed from installing earlier punched card technologies. Some years later the problems of unemployment and privacy were realised but it was too late to turn back. Computers were here to stay. Thus, this thesis highlights some key issues relating to government decision-making processes surrounding significant new technology applications. It also provides an opportunity to examine Cabinet minutes, submissions and decisions in relation to technological innovation.
    [Show full text]