<<

WITNESSING TO THE CALVINISM OF THE ENGLISH CHURCH: THE 1618 EDITION OF THOMAS BRADWARDINE’S »DE CAUSA DEI ADVERSUS PELAGIUM«

Luca Baschera

Thomas Bradwardine died on the 26th of August 1349, 38 days after his consecration as .1 Early in his career at Merton College, Oxford, he had engaged in the study of mathematical and physical questions, discussing them in a number of works which remain for the most part still unedited.2 During his studies at Oxford, however, he also came to the fundamental conclusion that the theo- logians of his days did not grant the grace of God an appropriate place in matters of soteriology. It was precisely the desire to reassert the Augustinian point of view against any kind of Pelagian tendency which according to him dominated the of many among his contem- poraries, that caused him to write »De causa Dei adversus Pelagium et de virtute causarum«, which he completed between 1335 and 1344.3 This essay will not engage in a study of »De causa Dei« as such, but will rather attempt to reconstruct the motives which led to the publi- cation of the first – and to date also the only – printed edition of this work, published in London in 1618. A mere consideration of the year of publication together with an awareness of the focus of Bradwardi- ne’s work (the defence of Augustinian soteriology) should cause histo- rians of the Reformation to suspect the presence of specific theological behind the decision to print it.4 This suspicion is further in- creased by the fact that this edition was prepared by order of the »most

1 Heiko A. Oberman, Archbishop Thomas Bradwardine: A Fourteenth Century Augustinian, Utrecht 1958, 22. 2 See Oberman, Bradwardine, 12f. 3 For a discussion of the year of completion of »De causa Dei« cf. Oberman, Brad- wardine, 18f. 4 Such a suspicion was already formulated by Nicholas Tyacke, Anti-Calvinists: The Rise of English Arminiansim c.1590–1640, Oxford 1987, 56. 434 luca baschera reverend« archbishop of Canterbury ,5 whose Calvinist6 tendencies are well known. This article, attempting to substantiate the suspicions mentioned above, argues that the publication of Bradwardine’s »De causa Dei« in 1618 should essentially be understood as a piece of religious propagan- da. Through the publication of the anti-Pelagian work of his prede- cessor Thomas Bradwardine George Abbot wanted to reassert the Reformed doctrine of against its critics in England, sub- mitting at the same time to the foreign Reformed churches – which were to assemble at the Synod of Dort in the same year – a clear evidence of what he considered the official position of his own church. Bradwardine’s voluminous attack against the Pelagians was therefore meant as a witness to the Calvinism of the English Church, as it were, prior to Calvin himself.

1. »Beharrung« and »Bewegung« in English Theology between the 16th and 17th Century

Although the majority of English theologians remained loyal to Cal- vinist positions throughout the reigns of Elizabeth and James I,7 there were also significant areas of dissent, which testify to the presence of alternative views at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge as well as among the . The cases of Antonio del Corro (Oxford) and William Barrett (Cambridge) shall serve as examples of the university debates. Corro, a former Spanish monk, who came to England in 1568 and taught at Oxford from around 1579 to 1586, was denied the title of

5 Thomas Bradwardine, De causa Dei adversus Pelagium, London: Norton, 1618 (Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, and Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640, compiled by A.W. Pollard and G.R. Red- grave [Pollard STC], 3 vols., London 21986, no. 3534), title page: »Iussu reveren- diss[imi] Georgii Abbot Cantuariensis archiepiscopi.« 6 In the present essay the term »Calvinist« is used simply to indicate those who supported a doctrine of absolute predestination as it was developed by Reformed theologians such as Peter Martyr Vermigli or Girolamo Zanchi and as it was after- wards endorsed at the Synod of Dort. Since this view of predestination was shared in England by both conformists and non-conformists, the label »Calvinist« does not as such imply any specific attitude in matters of church government. 7 Tyacke, Anti-Calvinists, 4, 28. Tyacke corroborates his thesis about the Calvinist »monopoly« in this period with a careful analysis of the sermons preached at Paul’s Cross, which until 1632 took an orthodox Calvinist line in matters of predestination, cf. Tyacke, Anti-Calvinists, 248–265.