DOCSLIB.ORG

I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Corridor System Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Corridor System Management Plan I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Corridor System Management Plan Draft Prepared by January 15, 2010 Interstate 80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project Corridor System Management Plan DRAFT By DKS Associates 1000 Broadway, Suite 450 Oakland, CA 94607 (510) 763-2061 January 15, 2010 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEEDS OF CSMP ................................................................................ 1 1.2 THE I-80 CSMP CORRIDOR .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 CORRIDOR TEAM .......................................................................................................... 2 2 CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 5 2.1 FREEWAY ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 ARTERIALS ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 TRANSIT .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Rail Service ................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Bus Service ............................................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Park-and-Ride Facilities............................................................................................ 12 2.4 MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS....................................................................................... 16 2.4.1 Powell Street Emeryville Shopping District ............................................................. 16 2.4.2 Golden Gate Fields ................................................................................................... 16 2.4.3 University of California Berkeley ............................................................................. 16 2.4.4 Richmond Hilltop Shopping Area ............................................................................ 16 2.4.5 Port of Oakland ......................................................................................................... 16 2.5 EXISTING ITS INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................... 16 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS.................................................................................................. 18 3.1 TRAVEL DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................. 18 3.1.1 Corridor Traffic Volume ........................................................................................... 18 3.1.2 Traffic Peaking Patterns ............................................................................................ 21 3.1.3 Trip Origin-Destination Patterns ............................................................................... 24 3.1.4 Truck Traffic ............................................................................................................. 26 3.1.5 Mode Choice Characteristics .................................................................................... 27 3.2 FREEWAY PERFORMANCE ....................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Mobility..................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.2 Reliability .................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.3 Safety ........................................................................................................................ 39 3.2.4 Productivity ............................................................................................................... 44 3.2.5 Preservation............................................................................................................... 46 3.2.6 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Performance ............................................................ 46 3.3 ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE ....................................................................................... 49 3.3.1 Arterial Travel Time ................................................................................................. 49 3.3.2 Accident Records on Arterials .................................................................................. 50 3.3.3 Intersection Level of Service .................................................................................... 54 3.4 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................... 59 3.4.1 Rail Service ............................................................................................................... 59 3.4.2 Bus Service ............................................................................................................... 60 I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project ii January 15, 2010 Draft CSMP 3.5 BOTTLENECKS ............................................................................................................. 62 3.5.1 I-80 Eastbound Bottlenecks and Causalities ............................................................. 62 3.5.2 I-80 Westbound Bottlenecks and Causalities ........................................................... 72 4 MODELING APPROACH .................................................................................................. 78 4.1 FORECASTING APPROACH ....................................................................................... 78 4.2 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPROACH .................................................................. 81 5 FUTURE BASELINE CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 82 5.1 BASELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ................................................................... 82 5.2 TRAVEL DEMAND TRENDS ...................................................................................... 82 5.2.1 Land Use ................................................................................................................... 82 5.2.2 Freeway Demands ..................................................................................................... 83 5.2.3 Arterial Demands ...................................................................................................... 84 5.2.4 Mode Choice ............................................................................................................. 85 5.2.5 Transit Ridership ....................................................................................................... 86 5.3 MOBILITY TRENDS ..................................................................................................... 87 5.3.1 I-80 Study Corridor ................................................................................................... 87 5.3.2 I-80 Freeway Mainline .............................................................................................. 87 5.3.3 San Pablo Avenue ..................................................................................................... 89 5.4 SAFETY TRENDS ......................................................................................................... 91 5.5 RELIABILITY TRENDS ................................................................................................ 92 5.6 CONGESTION AND BOTTLENECK TRENDS .......................................................... 92 6 IMRPOVEMENT STRATEGIES .................................................................................... 100 6.1 CANDIDATE STRATEGIES AND CONSTRAINTS ................................................. 100 6.2 I-80 ICM PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS...................................................................... 101 6.2.1 Expected Benefits of the Project ............................................................................. 102 6.3 ROADWAY GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................... 105 6.4 SYSTEM MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ......................................................... 106 6.5 TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................................... 108 6.6 NON-MOTORIZED MODE IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................ 109 6.7 DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ............................................................... 110 6.8 TRAVELER INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 111 6.9 GOODS MOVEMENT POLICIES ............................................................................... 113 6.9.1 Roadway Time of Day Restrictions ........................................................................ 113 6.9.2 Lane Restrictions .................................................................................................... 113 6.9.3 Remote Transfer Sites ............................................................................................. 114 6.10 ITS IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................. 114 7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ............................................................................................ 116 7.1 NEAR-TERM ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan
    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS October - December 2020
    QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS REPORTS October - December 2020 Quarterly Project Status Report Oct – Dec 2020 ON-GOING PROJECTS A. PROJECTS MANAGED BY AUTHORITY 1106S2 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes – Segment 2 ....................................................................................................................... 1 5002 State Route 4: Mokelumne Bike Trail/Pedestrian Crossing ........................................................................... 3 5005 State Route 4: Balfour Road Interchange – Phase 1 ........................................................................................ 5 5007 State Route 239 ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 6001 Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange Improvements: State Route 4 Widening – Phase 3 .............. 9 6002/6004 State Route 242/Clayton Road Ramps ................................................................................................................. 11 6006 State Route 4 Operational Improvements: Interstate 680 to Bailey Road ................................................ 13 7002 Interstate 80/San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Improvements .................................................................. 15 7003 Interstate 80/Central Avenue Interchange Improvements ............................................................................. 17 8001 Interstate 680 HOV Completion and Express Lanes .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
    Marin County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Prepared by Caroline Peattie and Jessica Tankersley, Fair Housing of Marin For the Marin County Community Development Agency Approved by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on October 11, 2011 MMMARIN CCCOUNTY CCCOMMUNITY DDDEVELOPMENT AAAGENCY BBBRIAN C.C.C. CCCRAWFORD ,,, DDDIRECTOR FFFEDERAL GGGRANTS DDDIVISION October 28, 2011 Mr. Chuck Hauptman, Regional Director Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Region IX U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 600 Harrison Street, Third Floor San Francisco, California 94107 Subject: County of Marin Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Dear Mr. Hauptman: On October 11, 2011, the Marin County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, including an Implementation Plan. This was the culmination of a process of ten public hearings. I am pleased to provide you with the enclosed copies of both documents. A video of the Board of Supervisors hearing is posted on the County’s website at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/BS/Archive/Meetings.cfm . Please let me know if you have any comments about these items. Sincerely, Roy Bateman Community Development Coordinator cc: Supervisor Judy Arnold Sharon Chan Brian Crawford Jeff Jackson K:\Analysis Of Impediments (AI)\AI & Implementation Documents\Analysis Of Impediments - Final Version As Approved By Bos October 11 2011\Transmittal To HUD.Docx/rb Mailing Address: 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308, San Rafael, California 94903-4157 Office Location: 899 Northgate Drive, Room 408, San Rafael, California Telephone (415) 499-6698 - California Relay Service 711 - Fax (415) 507-4061 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Marin County, it is unlawful to restrict housing choice on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, age, and source of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart Schedule El Cerrito Plaza to Sfo
    Bart Schedule El Cerrito Plaza To Sfo Reviewable Andrus usually presetting some disablement or attune kindheartedly. Wizardly and selfsame Jehu never financiers his bikinis! Unclassifiable and sphinxlike Seth never prerecord yet when George dinge his Chichewa. However the push must have a bigger law enforcement presence in the BART system wardrobe at times. Mionight Union City Pacifica approx times Weekends Holidays Weekdays 6. All built initially developed, el cerrito del norte station gateway, and disinfecting and is fast, we are felony and does bart millbrae on the day. Best Ways to salvation From BART El Cerrito del Norte Station to. Find parking costs opening hours and a parking map of El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Park. The Transbay Tube over an underwater rail tunnel that carries Bay area Rapid Transit's four transbay lines under San Francisco Bay through the cities of San Francisco and Oakland in California. It makes a mine at SFO and plum is a shuttle from the Coliseum station perform the Oakland. With one is bart schedule el cerrito plaza bart follows the moment we are. TE BART System Map Hwy DDADDOOR Hwy os 4 Transportation Corridor Under. Construction schedules will research be finalized until after BART accepts a. Each of questions. Face coverings required BART now closes at 9pm Saturday and Sunday open am-9pm having daily BART updates related to coronavirus Looking cut the. Bart schedule and there was the el cerrito plaza bart schedule to sfo with housing activists, i get a high in our facilities for most of resources where there.
    [Show full text]
  • Ja D C M B G Ill a Rs R
    . e Dr . Park Ridg e Harrison D v r. A t M l u Morton Ave. l C lfo a r t d W . F . s y y e . Klos W . e Hill y e top Dr. W W v A d s Dr Stanton Ave. o la . n il o r i n l a l C w D z r e o n a ucero idg e C . A R M r v m D e u Mi . l ner o . Ave c B . l y. d u W R Joh ap r. e l n A c D id r. l ve. A la s w D a o e ie M an e v . p e H p Es r v t ro to T G i ll S l i Ga H rrity W ate lv y. h hg Dr. t g i . Hi e y 1 Pa w 1 bl w Pa o Vi H Pk lmer sta A ir. D ill Ave. ve. C r to d ew . p D on evi r. m at r. h G D Mckenz ic Co ller ie D R nnec Mi . r. ticu t y on Dr. t Ave. er Gilm Henders b W a D Ro r. a l A r. r airmede D l F E . t . t n r. a e e W D S e y. M v d . m M Wiswall D . r o h r u r A e ro ll . e i d t D n G s r b D 4 r a R Ri o B r.
    [Show full text]
  • El Cerrito Historical Trail
    EL CERRITO HISTORICAL TRAIL Cub Scout Pack 104 El Cerrito, California www.elcerritoscouting.org Hike Information Total Trail Length: 8.0 Miles Western Segment - Del Norte Station to EC Plaza Station: 3.8 Miles Eastern Segment - EC Plaza Station to Del Norte Station: 4.2 Miles Hike Instructions The following pages include step-by-step hiking directions, denoted by underlined text. Major points of interest are highlighted in BOLD CAPITAL LETTERS. Informational text is presented in the indented sections. There are Numbered Questions for you to answer along the way. You may write in answers next to the questions or use the optional answer sheet at the back of the booklet. Cub Scouts are encouraged to hike as much of the trail as they can, but they are not required to complete the whole 8 miles. Do your best! Older Scouts are expected to complete the entire trail in order to earn the patch. The hike is designed as a loop, starting and ending at the Del Norte BART Station, but you may jump in anywhere along the route. The trail may be hiked over multiple days; there is no time limit. If you have difficulty finding a point of interest or the answer to a question, it’s ok to skip it and move on to the next one. What you’re looking for may no longer be there. A Brief History of El Cerrito The area around present-day El Cerrito was once home to the Ohlone Indians. The first Spanish explorers, led by Pedro Fages, arrived in 1772 and set up camp alongside the “cerrito” known today as Albany Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • I Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft
    i Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California CHARLES SEIM The Bay Bridge Oral History Project Interviews conducted by Sam Redman in 2012 Copyright © 2013 by the California Department of Transportation This series of interviews was funded through a contract with the Oakland Museum of California, the California Department of Transportation, the California Transportation Commission, and the Bay Area Toll Authority ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Charles Seim dated September 4, 2012. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are hereby transferred to and reserved by The California Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Bay
    ABOVE & BELOW | EXHIBITION LESSONS Mapping the Bay. Instructions for Teachers This lesson is to be done in class before visiting the museum and uses a map of the Bay to orient students to the geography of the Bay Area. Make copies of the map for students. Explain that on the left side, there is a wide border— this is not land. Students should understand that the Pacific Ocean extends beyond that border. Before You Start With the Map In order to do this assignment you need a projection of the map or a larger copy or to draw what you need on the board. Most students will work best if they can see what you are directing them to place on the map. Make sure you circulate around the class to assist where necessary. You also might want to download or get a copy of a San Francisco Bay Area Map [baycityguide.com provides a map that is useful] and a map with the bridges that cross the bay. [Bay Area Toll Authority makes a map that is useful]. Allow time for students to look at the shape of bay and how it is formed. Ask students why it might be called a Bay—how the Bay might have been formed, etc. Mapping the Bay The lower left hand border is a good place to put a compass rose. Students should use the lower left hand corner to put a compass rose with the cardinal directions: North, South, East, West. After you have the directions identified, have students find and write in the east bay, north bay, and south bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation Meeting
    Business Outreach Committee (BOC) A Consortium of Bay Area Transportation Agencies *****PUBLIC NOTICE***** The BOC invites you to a meeting to advise the public of upcoming projects and to receive comments on our goal setting processes: Tuesday , April 12, 2016 From 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Alameda County Transportation Commission* 1111 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94607 *directions are attached; public transportation is encouraged as parking is limited. Please click here to register! Your attendance is strongly encouraged. Please inform businesses that may not have received this notice. This meeting will provide the opportunity for members of the public to learn about upcoming transportation projects and provide input on the goal-setting process, specifically on the relative availability of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) that are ready, willing and able to compete for U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) assisted contracts to be let by transportation agencies throughout the San Francisco Bay Area . Representatives from the agencies listed to the left will be presenting their agency’s upcoming contract opportunities The Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA) will provide a special presentation on the Downtown San Francisco Ferry Terminal Expansion Project The BOC hereby notifies all interested parties that the agencies listed to the left are beginning the process of establishing annual overall goals for participation by DBEs in contracts and procurements which may be financed in whole or in part by the DOT for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2017-2019. Directions to Alameda County Transportation Commission Alameda CTC 1111 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94607-4006 510.208.7400 510.893.6489 (fax) Alameda CTC is accessible by multiple transportation modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda County
    County Summaries Alameda County Overview Located at the heart of the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, Alameda County is the second-largest county in the Bay Area, with a population of over 1.66 million. The extensive transportation network of roads, rails, buses, trails and pathways carries roughly 1.2 million commute trips daily to, from, within and through the county, supporting economic growth in the Bay Area, California and the rest of the nation. The county’s transportation system is multimodal, with non-auto trips growing more quickly than auto trips: between 2010 and 2018, for every new solo driver, four people began using transit, walking, biking, or telecommuting. Roads and Highways Alameda County roadways move people and goods within the county and beyond and support multiple transportation modes. As regional economic and population growth increase demand for goods and services, a variety of modes, including cars, transit, bikes and trucks, are competing to access the same facilities. The majority of Alameda County’s 3,978 road miles are highways, arterials and major local roads that provide access to housing, jobs, education and transit. Forty percent of daily trips in Alameda County are carried on arterials and major roads. Currently, five of the Bay Area’s top 10 most-congested freeway segments are in Alameda County, and average freeway delays are growing. The congestion in Alameda County is compounded by the large amount of vehicle, rail and Travelers have made over 14.5 million trips on the I-580 freight travel through Alameda Express Lanes since opening in February 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Locker Additions at San Leandro and El Cerrito Plaza Stations
    10/31/2019 https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 (Page 1 /6) GRANT APPLICATION TFCA REGIONAL FUND VEHICLE TRIP REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM FYE 2020 Applicant Eligibility Application packages must be submitted to the Air District BOTH electronically (online) and as a hard copy (one copy). Complete and eligible applications received after this date will be reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis until all funds have been awarded. Only complete applications will be evaluated. Please refer to the Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant Program website for complete program eligibility requirements and instructions. NOTE: This application will work best using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox browsers. PART 1. ELIGIBILITY Legal Name of Applicant Organization Bay Area Rapid Transit District Applicant or Applicant Sponsor Type Public Transit Agency *This grant is open only to public entities. Does the agency have adequate funds to cover all stages of the proposed project from commencement through completion? Yes Does the agency have funding from a non-Air District source available and commit to funding at least 10% of total Eligible https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 1/11 10/31/2019 https://www.tfaforms.com/forms/review/4745833/1c8af0bdd31987563f4e402f141c93f3/148658829 Costs ("matching funds")? Yes Is the agency in good standing with the Air District? Applicant must have met all applicable contractual requirements for any project funded by the Air District; have not failed a TFCA fiscal or performance audit in the past three years; and be in compliance with all local, state, and federal air quality regulations. Yes Project Eligibility Will the project achieve surplus emission reductions? i.e., reductions that are beyond what is required through regulations, contracts, and other legally binding obligations at the time the Air District executes the project's funding agreement.
    [Show full text]