© in This Web Service Cambridge University
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pilea Brasiliensis: a New Species of Pilea (Urticaceae) from Central Brazil
Phytotaxa 26: 17–20 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Pilea brasiliensis: a new species of Pilea (Urticaceae) from Central Brazil A.L. GAGLIOTI1, S. ROMANIUC1 & A.K. MONRO2 1Instituto de Botânica, CP 3005, 01031-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Departement of Botany, The Natural History Museum, London, SW75 BD, United Kingdom, E-mail:[email protected] Abstract During the course of floristic studies on Urticaceae in Distrito Federal, Brazil, we encountered a species of Pilea that was not described until now. Pilea brasiliensis is here described and illustrated, its affinities are discussed and its position in Weddell & Killip’s subdivisions of the genus is indicated. A Conservation Assessment determines P. brasiliensis to be Critically Endagered (CE) with the possibility that it may be Extinct in the Wild (EW). Key words: Critically Endangered, Elatostemateae, Fallaces, Species Conservation Assessment, systematics, taxonomy Introduction Pilea currently includes between 600–715 taxa (Adams 1970, Burger 1977, Monro 2004, 2006) and is probably the largest genus in Urticaceae. It is distributed throughout the tropics, subtropics and warm temperate regions (with the exception of Australia and New Zealand). Pilea is easily distinguished from other Neotropical Urticaceae by the combination of opposite leaves and ligulate intrapetiolar stipules in each leaf axil. Most of the species are small herbs, many of which are facultatively epiphytic or epipetric. The genus was first described by Lindley (1821), and subsequently Weddell (1869) recognized 159 species, which he classified into three groups: Integrifoliae, Heterophyllae and Dentatae, based on leaf isomorphy and margin morphology. -
Orchids: 2017 Global Ex Situ Collections Assessment
Orchids: 2017 Global Ex situ Collections Assessment Botanic gardens collectively maintain one-third of Earth's plant diversity. Through their conservation, education, horticulture, and research activities, botanic gardens inspire millions of people each year about the importance of plants. Ophrys apifera (Bernard DuPon) Angraecum conchoglossum With one in five species facing extinction due to threats such (Scott Zona) as habitat loss, climate change, and invasive species, botanic garden ex situ collections serve a central purpose in preventing the loss of species and essential genetic diversity. To support the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, botanic gardens create integrated conservation programs that utilize diverse partners and innovative techniques. As genetically diverse collections are developed, our collective global safety net against plant extinction is strengthened. Country-level distribution of orchids around the world (map data courtesy of Michael Harrington via ArcGIS) Left to right: Renanthera monachica (Dalton Holland Baptista ), Platanthera ciliaris (Wikimedia Commons Jhapeman) , Anacamptis boryi (Hans Stieglitz) and Paphiopedilum exul (Wikimedia Commons Orchi ). Orchids The diversity, stunning flowers, seductiveness, size, and ability to hybridize are all traits which make orchids extremely valuable Orchids (Orchidaceae) make up one of the largest plant families to collectors, florists, and horticulturists around the world. on Earth, comprising over 25,000 species and around 8% of all Over-collection of wild plants is a major cause of species flowering plants (Koopowitz, 2001). Orchids naturally occur on decline in the wild. Orchids are also very sensitive to nearly all continents and ecosystems on Earth, with high environmental changes, and increasing habitat loss and diversity found in tropical and subtropical regions. -
Buy Pilea Cadierei, Pilea Aluminium, Watermelon Pilea - Plant Online at Nurserylive | Best Plants at Lowest Price
Buy pilea cadierei, pilea aluminium, watermelon pilea - plant online at nurserylive | Best plants at lowest price Pilea Cadierei, Pilea Aluminium, Watermelon Pilea - Plant Showy, silver-splashed leaves make Aluminum Plant a stunning and popular house plant. Rating: Not Rated Yet Price Variant price modifier: Base price with tax Price with discount ?299 Salesprice with discount Sales price ?299 Sales price without tax ?299 Discount Tax amount Ask a question about this product Description With this purchase you will get: 01 Pilea Cadierei, Pilea Aluminium, Watermelon Pilea Plant 01 6 inch Grower Round Plastic Pot (Black) Description for Pilea Cadierei, Pilea Aluminium, Watermelon Pilea Plant height: 9 - 15 inches (22 - 39 cm) 1 / 3 Buy pilea cadierei, pilea aluminium, watermelon pilea - plant online at nurserylive | Best plants at lowest price Plant spread: Pilea cadierei is a species of flowering plant in the family Urticaceae, native to China and Vietnam. It is an evergreen perennial growing up to 30 cm tall by 21 cm broad, with dark green oval leaves, each leaf having four raised silvery patches. Common name(s): Aluminium Plant, Watermelon Plant Flower colours: Green, white Bloom time: Late Fall, Early Winter Max reachable height: 0.75 to 1.00 feet Difficulty to grow: Easy to grow Planting and care Common is a vine and has larger glossy green leaves than Royal. Both can survive in temperate climates if they are planted in a sheltered area. Arabian is a small bush with evergreen leaves. There are many other varieties of plant, of which are best suited for sub-tropical climates. -
Pilea Cadierei Aluminum Plant1 Edward F
FPS478 Pilea cadierei Aluminum Plant1 Edward F. Gilman2 Introduction Uses: hanging basket; suitable for growing indoors; ground cover; cascading down a wall The variegated foliage on aluminum plant is unlike any Availability: generally available in many areas within its other, with shiny silver, irregularly shaped markings parallel hardiness range to the lateral veins (Fig. 1). Leaves are held opposite each other on square, green stems, producing a thick ground cover about 12 inches tall in a shaded landscape. Small, white flowers are produced at the ends of the stems in the summer, but they are mostly overshadowed by the conspicuous foliage. Figure 2. Shaded area represents potential planting range. Description Figure 1. Aluminum plant Height: .5 to 1 feet General Information Spread: depends upon supporting structure Plant habit: spreading Scientific name: Pilea cadierei Plant density: moderate Pronunciation: PYE-lee-uh kuh-DEER-ree-eye Growth rate: moderate Common name(s): aluminum plant Texture: medium Family: Urticaceae Plant type: ground cover Foliage USDA hardiness zones: 10 through 11 (Fig. 2) Planting month for zone 10 and 11: year round Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite Origin: not native to North America Leaf type: simple Leaf margin: serrate 1. This document is FPS478, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 1999. Reviewed February 2014. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. -
Orchid Historical Biogeography, Diversification, Antarctica and The
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Orchid historical biogeography, ARTICLE diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal Thomas J. Givnish1*, Daniel Spalink1, Mercedes Ames1, Stephanie P. Lyon1, Steven J. Hunter1, Alejandro Zuluaga1,2, Alfonso Doucette1, Giovanny Giraldo Caro1, James McDaniel1, Mark A. Clements3, Mary T. K. Arroyo4, Lorena Endara5, Ricardo Kriebel1, Norris H. Williams5 and Kenneth M. Cameron1 1Department of Botany, University of ABSTRACT Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, Aim Orchidaceae is the most species-rich angiosperm family and has one of USA, 2Departamento de Biologıa, the broadest distributions. Until now, the lack of a well-resolved phylogeny has Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 3Centre for Australian National Biodiversity prevented analyses of orchid historical biogeography. In this study, we use such Research, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, a phylogeny to estimate the geographical spread of orchids, evaluate the impor- 4Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, tance of different regions in their diversification and assess the role of long-dis- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, tance dispersal (LDD) in generating orchid diversity. 5 Santiago, Chile, Department of Biology, Location Global. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Methods Analyses use a phylogeny including species representing all five orchid subfamilies and almost all tribes and subtribes, calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. We estimated historical biogeography and assessed the -
Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D. -
Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea Hyalina Fenzl (Urticaceae)
Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea hyalina United States Fenzl (Urticaceae) Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service July 17, 2012 Version 1 Left: Pilea hyalina (source: The Smithsonian’s Flora of the West Indies Database, http://botany.si.edu/antilles/WestIndies/catalog.htm). Right: Pilea hyalina flowers (source: TROPICOS database, http://tropicos.org/Home.aspx; photograph taken by O. M. Montiel). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Pilea hyalina Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA) —specifically, the PPQ WRA model1—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because our WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or any area within it. -
Natural Resources of Concern
APPENDIX D BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Natural Resources of Concern This resource list is to be used for planning purposes only Ð it is not an of®cial species list. Endangered Species Act species list information for your project is available online and listed below for the following FWS Field Of®ces: CARLSBAD FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE 6010 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 101 CARLSBAD, CA 92011 (760) 431-9440 http://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/ VENTURA FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE 2493 PORTOLA ROAD, SUITE B VENTURA, CA 93003 (805) 644-1766 Project Name: OMYA White Knob Mine 07/30/2013 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 1 of 5 Version 1.4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Natural Resources of Concern Project Location Map: Project Counties: San Bernardino, CA Geographic coordinates (Open Geospatial Consortium Well-Known Text, NAD83): MULTIPOLYGON (((-116.943255 34.3824195, -116.943255 34.3804361, -116.9827372 34.3801528, -116.9882303 34.3781693, -116.9904619 34.3780276, -116.9928652 34.3793027, -116.9956118 34.379161, -116.9983583 34.3778859, -117.0016199 34.3780276, -117.0043751 34.3770359, -117.0057398 34.3744856, -117.0035168 34.3710851, -117.0043665 34.3560648, -117.0280643 34.3566316, -117.0273777 34.3733521, -117.0067783 34.3723603, -117.0076281 34.3744856, -117.0052334 34.3784527, -117.0019718 34.3795861, -116.9945904 34.3808611, -116.9908138 34.3805778, -116.9894405 34.3794444, -116.9875523 34.3800111, -116.9832607 34.3814278, -116.9434353 34.3822778, -116.943255 34.3824195))) 07/30/2013 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 2 of 5 Version 1.4 U.S. -
Appendix B Biological Resources Analysis
Appendix B Biological Resources Analysis INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 38 NORTH MARENGO AVENUE PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91101 T 626.204.9800 F 626.204.9834 MEMORANDUM From: Michael Cady – Senior Biologist Subject: Biological Resources Analysis for the Buena Vista Project Date: August 18, 2020 Attachment(s): A) Photo Exhibit; B) Google Earth Imagery of the Project Site; C) Plant Compendium; D) Wildlife Compendium; E) Sensitive Resources Databases Query Results; F) Historic California Natural Diversity Database Records; G) Special-Status Plant Species Potential to Occur; H) Special-Status Wildlife Species Potential to Occur; I) Historical Aerial Imagery of the Project Site from 1948; J) National Wetlands Inventory Results; K) Wildlife Corridors and Habitat Connectivity Exhibit; L) California Natural Community Conservation Plans This memorandum (memo) details the methodology and results of Dudek’s site visit and analysis for the potential occurrence of sensitive resources within the proposed Buena Vista Project (project). The Project site is located at 1030–1380 North Broadway and 1251 North Spring Street, within the vicinity of the Chinatown neighborhood, downtown Los Angeles, Lincoln Heights, and Dodger Stadium/Elysian Park. The analysis was conducted in support of the Initial Study (IS) for the project to determine if additional studies or analysis are necessary. Methodology A review of existing information and a site visit was conducted to determine the biological resources that are present or have potential to occur on and adjacent to the project site. Literature Review A literature review was conducted prior to the field visit to identify special-status biological resources present or potentially present within the vicinity of the project site using the following: • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2020a) • California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants (CNPS 2020) • U.S. -
Supplementary Material Saving Rainforests in the South Pacific
Australian Journal of Botany 65, 609–624 © CSIRO 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT17096_AC Supplementary material Saving rainforests in the South Pacific: challenges in ex situ conservation Karen D. SommervilleA,H, Bronwyn ClarkeB, Gunnar KeppelC,D, Craig McGillE, Zoe-Joy NewbyA, Sarah V. WyseF, Shelley A. JamesG and Catherine A. OffordA AThe Australian PlantBank, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mount Annan, NSW 2567, Australia. BThe Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia DBiodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography Group, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. EInstitute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222 Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand. FRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, RH17 6TN, United Kingdom. GNational Herbarium of New South Wales, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. HCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 (below) comprises a list of seed producing genera occurring in rainforest in Australia and various island groups in the South Pacific, along with any available information on the seed storage behaviour of species in those genera. Note that the list of genera is not exhaustive and the absence of a genus from a particular island group simply means that no reference was found to its occurrence in rainforest habitat in the references used (i.e. the genus may still be present in rainforest or may occur in that locality in other habitats). As the definition of rainforest can vary considerably among localities, for the purpose of this paper we considered rainforests to be terrestrial forest communities, composed largely of evergreen species, with a tree canopy that is closed for either the entire year or during the wet season. -
THE ANDEAN SPECIES of PILEA by Ellsworth P. Killip INTRODUCTION
THE ANDEAN SPECIES OF PILEA By Ellsworth P. Killip INTRODUCTION Pilea is by far the largest genus of Urticaceae. Weddell in his final monograph 1 of the family recognized 159 species as valid, about 50 of which were said to occur in the Andes of South America. That these species had a very limited range of distribution was indicated by the fact that more than 30 were known from only a single collection and that only 9 of the others were in any sense widely distributed in the Andean countries. Two, P. microphyUa and P. pubescens, occurred throughout the American Tropics, and P. kyalina and P. dendrophUa extended eastward in South America. In the 50 years following the publication of this monograph only 10 species were described from the Andean region. Because of the large number of specimens of Pilea collected by expeditions to the Andes sponsored by the Smithsonian Institution, the New York Botanical Garden, the Gray Herbarium and the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, the Field Museum of Natural History, and the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, which were submitted to me for identification but which could not be assigned to any known species, I began the preparation of a mono- graph of all the Andean species. This was completed in 1935 but unfortunately could not be printed in its entirety at that time. Instead, a greatly abridged paper was published,2 which contained a key to all the Andean species, descriptions of 30 new ones, and a few changes of name and of rank. In this there was no opportunity to present descriptions of the earlier species or to discuss their synonymy. -
Dating the Origin of the Orchidaceae from a Fossil Orchid with Its Pollinator
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6111228 Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Article in Nature · September 2007 DOI: 10.1038/nature06039 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 211 770 5 authors, including: Santiago R Ramírez Barbara Gravendeel University of California, Davis Leiden University, Naturalis Biodiversity Center & University of Applied Sciences L… 50 PUBLICATIONS 999 CITATIONS 208 PUBLICATIONS 2,081 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Rodrigo B. Singer Naomi E Pierce Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Harvard University 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,381 CITATIONS 555 PUBLICATIONS 6,496 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Insect endosymbiont diversity View project Support threatened research Institutions from Southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Barbara Gravendeel on 31 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Vol 448 | 30 August 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature06039 LETTERS Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Santiago R. Ramı´rez1, Barbara Gravendeel2, Rodrigo B. Singer3, Charles R. Marshall1,4 & Naomi E. Pierce1 Since the time of Darwin1, evolutionary biologists have been fas- subfamily showed that the size, shape and ornamentation of the cinated by the spectacular adaptations to insect pollination exhib- fossil closely resemble those of modern members of the subtribe ited by orchids. However, despite being the most diverse plant Goodyerinae, particularly the genera Kreodanthus and Microchilus family on Earth2, the Orchidaceae lack a definitive fossil record (Supplementary Table 1).